THE medical community and broader society are concerned about the possibility of postoperative cognitive alteration. Many studies have found that postoperative delirium and decrements in cognition lasting months are relatively common. However, studies that have followed patients long-term have generally not found persistent postoperative cognitive decline (POCD) independently attributable to surgery, especially when appropriate nonsurgical control groups have been included.1
An important challenge from a research perspective is that POCD does not have consensus diagnostic criteria, and as such is both an elusive and controversial clinical condition. To add to the confusion, recent studies have found that some surgical patients appear to show postoperative cognitive improvement, possibly after resolution of delirium or early POCD.3
It is currently unknown whether specific patients may be vulnerable to decline, or even if some patients might experience cognitive improvement (conceivably related to correction of underlying surgical problems or resolution of chronic pain). Whether and to what extent anesthetic techniques, types of surgery, inflammatory responses, postoperative complications, and surgical outcomes contribute to cognitive trajectories remains obscure.5–7
“As with other organs, like the heart and kidneys, so too with the brain: acute postoperative dysfunction is probably common and potentially preventable.”
In this issue of ANESTHESIOLOGY, Kline et al.
approach the controversies surrounding persistent POCD employing an innovative approach.8
Using both clinical and neuroimaging data from two cohorts of participants in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, they investigated whether a surgical cohort (n = 41) had distinct brain morphologic changes and cognitive trajectories compared with a propensity matched nonsurgical cohort (n = 123). This method is intellectually appealing, as quantitative magnetic resonance imaging can accurately track longitudinal changes in brain anatomy. Although volume alteration in various brain regions provides only a surrogate marker of brain health, such variations are not subject to the vagaries and potential unreliability of serial cognitive testing.9
Kline et al.
's findings are intriguing. Surgical patients on average showed greater cortical and hippocampal volume loss than the nonsurgical cohort at the first follow-up visit, which for the surgical group was about half a year postoperatively. Those in the surgical cohort who had baseline mild cognitive impairment showed interval POCD at the initial follow-up, using a commonly used definition of POCD based on an arbitrary threshold change in a composite cognitive battery.10
But more curious than the findings at the initial follow-up is that at subsequent visits, both the neuroimaging and cognitive differences between the cohorts were no longer apparent. Specifically, some subjects showed improved brain volumes or recovery from atrophy. Although this is a novel concept in relation to POCD, it parallels findings in other studies of older patients, where exercise has been found to improve cortical volumes.11
On a cautionary note, cognition can change without measureable changes in cortical volumes and vice versa
. In relation to surgery specifically, data are lacking about postoperative cognitive alteration and changes in regional brain volumes.
In order to increase the likelihood that any differences seen between groups were potentially attributable to the surgical events (as opposed to other factors), Kline et al.
used propensity matching, which is a sophisticated statistical matching approach for observational data. In their statistical analyses, they appropriately incorporated correction for multiple comparisons, in order to decrease the likelihood of false positive results. However, even with their rigorous statistical methods, there could have been unaccounted for important differences between the surgical and nonsurgical cohorts that might have confounded the results. Furthermore, the surgical group was small and the operations were diverse. It is also important to note that even very healthy elderly people display longitudinal volume loss in both gray and white brain matter,12
and subtle cognitive decline occurs with healthy aging.13
Taking these qualifiers into account, this study should be viewed as generating another hypothesis: after surgery some patients experience temporary, measurable cognitive decline, which is reflected in reversible anatomical changes in specific brain regions. Prospective longitudinal studies, including appropriate surgical and matched nonsurgical cohorts, and incorporating serial neuroimaging and cognitive assessments, would be helpful in testing this hypothesis. Interestingly, these intriguing findings are consistent with recent discoveries and can potentially be explained on biologically plausible grounds.
Surgery is frequently complicated by chronic pain, wound infections, inflammation, and organ dysfunction. Pain, infection, and inflammation carry a cognitive burden, and could potentially exacerbate cognitive decline associated with ageing.14–16
In several diverse chronic pain states, gray matter brain changes have been observed.17
Cognitive impairment accompanying dysfunction of other organs, like renal impairment, has become appreciated as common and is recognized as a public health challenge.18
Neuroimaging studies have suggested that antiinflammatory drugs might in certain circumstances provide protection against age-related loss of brain volume.19
Patients who receive successful kidney transplants show persistent cognitive improvement.21
Surgeries that frequently decrease pain and inflammation, such as coronary artery bypass surgery and joint replacement surgery, have been associated with both quality-of-life enhancement and persistent cognitive improvement.3
Recent prospective studies that have combined neuroimaging, pain, and functional assessments have shown that when surgery (e.g.
, back surgery or hip replacement surgery) successfully treats chronic pain (and inflammation), cognition improves and gray matter increases in areas such as the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, the anterior cingulate cortex, and the amygdala.25
What are implications for perioperative clinicians of the intriguing findings of Kline, Rodriguez-Raecke, and Seminowicz8
regarding perioperative neuroplasticity? As with other organs, like the heart and kidneys, so too with the brain: acute postoperative dysfunction is probably common and potentially preventable. Conversely, with successful surgery, with resolution of pain and inflammation, and with improvement in quality of life, neuroanatomical changes coupled with improved cognition might occur. The fact that the brain retains a lifelong capacity for plasticity and adaptive reorganization13
is probably really significant for clinicians caring for elderly people undergoing elective surgery, which predictably and frequently incurs an early cognitive cost, but could also yield sustained cognitive benefit. Importantly, research has shown that dimensions of negative reorganization should be at least partially reversible through the use of an appropriately designed brain-training program.13
Anesthesiologists should identify patients at risk, attempt to mitigate postoperative delirium and acute neurologic deterioration, and promote successful surgical outcomes with the aim of effecting quality-of-life enhancement coupled with postoperative cognitive improvement. Such an approach would be analogous to our efforts to optimize perioperative cardiorespiratory fitness, which itself improves cognitive function in older healthy people.11
Specifically, research efforts should be directed toward assessing the potential benefits of perioperative brain-plasticity-based interventions,28
utilizing cognitive test batteries as well as both functional and structural neuroimaging studies, to determine the efficacy of a brain-training program.
Michael S. Avidan, M.B., B.Ch.,* Tammie L. Benzinger, M.D., Ph.D.† *Division of Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri. email@example.com. †Diagnostic Radiology, Neuroradiology, Washington University School of Medicine.
1. Newman S, Stygall J, Hirani S, Shaefi S, Maze M: Postoperative cognitive dysfunction after noncardiac surgery: A systematic review. ANESTHESIOLOGY 2007; 106:572–90
2. Avidan MS, Evers AS: Review of clinical evidence for persistent cognitive decline or incident dementia attributable to surgery or general anesthesia. J Alzheimers Dis 2011; 24:201–16
3. Wahrborg P, Booth JE, Clayton T, Nugara F, Pepper J, Weintraub WS, Sigwart U, Stables RH, SoS Neuropsychology Substudy Investigators: Neuropsychological outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting: Results from the Stent or Surgery (SoS) Trial. Circulation 2004; 110:3411–7
4. Jankowski CJ, Trenerry MR, Cook DJ, Buenvenida SL, Stevens SR, Schroeder DR, Warner DO: Cognitive and functional predictors and sequelae of postoperative delirium in elderly patients undergoing elective joint arthroplasty. Anesth Analg 2011; 112:1186–93
5. Guay J: General anaesthesia does not contribute to long-term post-operative cognitive dysfunction in adults: A meta-analysis. Indian J Anaesth 2011; 55:358–63
6. Cibelli M, Fidalgo AR, Terrando N, Ma D, Monaco C, Feldmann M, Takata M, Lever IJ, Nanchahal J, Fanselow MS, Maze M: Role of interleukin-1beta in postoperative cognitive dysfunction. Ann Neurol 2010; 68:360–8
7. Ancelin ML, de Roquefeuil G, Scali J, Bonnel F, Adam JF, Cheminal JC, Cristol JP, Dupuy AM, Carrière I, Ritchie K: Long-term post-operative cognitive decline in the elderly: The effects of anesthesia type, apolipoprotein E genotype, and clinical antecedents. J Alzheimers Dis 2010; 22:105–13
8. Kline RP, Pirraglia E, Cheng H, De Santi S, Li Y, Haile M, de Leon MJ, Bekker A: Surgery and brain atrophy in cognitively normal elderly subjects and subjects diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment. ANESTHESIOLOGY 2012; 116:603–12
9. Rasmussen LS, Siersma VD, ISPOCD Group: Postoperative cognitive dysfunction: True deterioration versus random variation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2004; 48:1137–43
10. Moller JT, Cluitmans P, Rasmussen LS, Houx P, Rasmussen H, Canet J, Rabbitt P, Jolles J, Larsen K, Hanning CD, Langeron O, Johnson T, Lauven PM, Kristensen PA, Biedler A, van Beem H, Fraidakis O, Silverstein JH, Beneken JE, Gravenstein JS: Long-term postoperative cognitive dysfunction in the elderly ISPOCD1 study. ISPOCD investigators. International Study of Post-Operative Cognitive Dysfunction. Lancet 1998; 351:857–61
11. Erickson KI, Kramer AF: Aerobic exercise effects on cognitive and neural plasticity in older adults. Br J Sports Med 2009; 43:22–4
12. Resnick SM, Pham DL, Kraut MA, Zonderman AB, Davatzikos C: Longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging studies of older adults: A shrinking brain. J Neurosci 2003; 23:3295–301
13. Mahncke HW, Connor BB, Appelman J, Ahsanuddin ON, Hardy JL, Wood RA, Joyce NM, Boniske T, Atkins SM, Merzenich MM: Memory enhancement in healthy older adults using a brain plasticity-based training program: A randomized, controlled study. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006; 103:12523–8
14. Fidalgo AR, Cibelli M, White JP, Nagy I, Maze M, Ma D: Systemic inflammation enhances surgery-induced cognitive dysfunction in mice. Neurosci Lett 2011; 498:63–6
15. Chen J, Buchanan JB, Sparkman NL, Godbout JP, Freund GG, Johnson RW: Neuroinflammation and disruption in working memory in aged mice after acute stimulation of the peripheral innate immune system. Brain Behav Immun 2008; 22:301–11
16. Sy M, Kitazawa M, Medeiros R, Whitman L, Cheng D, Lane TE, Laferla FM: Inflammation induced by infection potentiates tau pathological features in transgenic mice. Am J Pathol 2011; 178:2811–22
17. May A: Chronic pain may change the structure of the brain. Pain 2008; 137:7–15
18. Murray AM: Cognitive impairment in the aging dialysis and chronic kidney disease populations: An occult burden. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis 2008; 15:123–32
19. Walther K, Bendlin BB, Glisky EL, Trouard TP, Lisse JR, Posever JO, Ryan L: Anti-inflammatory drugs reduce age-related decreases in brain volume in cognitively normal older adults. Neurobiol Aging 2011; 32:497–505
20. Bendlin BB, Newman LM, Ries ML, Puglielli L, Carlsson CM, Sager MA, Rowley HA, Gallagher CL, Willette AA, Alexander AL, Asthana S, Johnson SC: NSAIDs may protect against age-related brain atrophy. Front Aging Neurosci 2010; 2:pii:35
21. Harciarek M, Biedunkiewicz B, Lichodziejewska-Niemierko M, Dębska-Ślizień A, Rutkowski B: Continuous cognitive improvement 1 year following successful kidney transplant. Kidney Int 2011; 79:1353–60
22. Patel RV, Stygall J, Harrington J, Newman SP, Haddad FS: Cerebral microembolization during primary total hip arthroplasty and neuropsychologic outcome: A pilot study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468:1621–9
23. Ethgen O, Bruyère O, Richy F, Dardennes C, Reginster JY: Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty. A qualitative and systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86-A:963–74
24. Cohen DJ, Van Hout B, Serruys PW, Mohr FW, Macaya C, den Heijer P, Vrakking MM, Wang K, Mahoney EM, Audi S, Leadley K, Dawkins KD, Kappetein AP, Synergy between PCI with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery Investigators: Quality of life after PCI with drug-eluting stents or coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 2011; 364:1016–26
25. Rodriguez-Raecke R, Niemeier A, Ihle K, Ruether W, May A: Brain gray matter decrease in chronic pain is the consequence and not the cause of pain. J Neurosci 2009; 29:13746–50
26. Seminowicz DA, Wideman TH, Naso L, Hatami-Khoroushahi Z, Fallatah S, Ware MA, Jarzem P, Bushnell MC, Shir Y, Ouellet JA, Stone LS: Effective treatment of chronic low back pain in humans reverses abnormal brain anatomy and function. J Neurosci 2011; 31:7540–50
27. Angevaren M, Aufdemkampe G, Verhaar HJ, Aleman A, Vanhees L: Physical activity and enhanced fitness to improve cognitive function in older people without known cognitive impairment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; 3:CD005381
28. Mahncke HW, Bronstone A, Merzenich MM: Brain plasticity and functional losses in the aged: Scientific bases for a novel intervention. Prog Brain Res 2006; 157:81–109
© 2012 American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc.