Novel Oral Anticoagulants: New Challenges for Anesthesiologists in Bleeding Patients
Spahn, Donat R. M.D., F.R.C.A.*; Korte, Wolfgang M.D.†
IN recent years, tremendous efforts have been made to develop new oral anticoagulants for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after surgery and in medically ill patients, prevention of stroke in atrial fibrillation, reduction of cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome, and treatment of confirmed acute pulmonary embolism and deep venous thrombosis. The most prominent modes of action by these novel drugs are direct factor Xa inhibition (rivaroxaban and apixaban) or thrombin inhibition (dabigatran). These drugs are administered orally at fixed doses, and no monitoring is necessary compared with prothrombin time (PT)/international normalized ratio measurement in patients treated with oral vitamin K antagonists.1
“… anesthesiologists are likely to increasingly face patients who have experienced trauma or other causes of bleeding and who are being treated with these new anticoagulants.”
Dabigatran received approval by the Food and Drug Administration (for the prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation) as of October 1, 20102
and rivaroxaban (for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after hip and knee arthroplasty3–6
) as of July 1, 2011.
As is the case with all anticoagulants, including (low–molecular-weight) heparins and vitamin K antagonists, the new substances have an inherent bleeding risk.1
When these novel anticoagulants are used for thromboprophylaxis after hip or knee arthroplasty (and thus for 2–6 weeks at low dose), the risk of major bleeding in such patients is low. However, new indications for these novel anticoagulants may arise with higher doses and longer treatment durations. Thus, anesthesiologists are likely to increasingly face patients who have experienced trauma or other causes of bleeding and who are being treated with these new anticoagulants. The most pertinent questions for which we do not yet have complete answers are: How can we measure the effect on blood coagulation? and How can we specifically treat such patients?
The study by Godier et al
. in this issue of ANESTHESIOLOGY7
is very important because it is the first that addresses these questions for rivaroxaban, which is now marketed in more than 100 countries. This study in rabbits was designed and executed elegantly: first, a dose-finding study was performed to find the necessary dose of intravenous rivaroxaban that would result in increased bleeding after a standardized liver and spleen incision. Consequently, the lowest rivaroxaban dose (5 mg/kg) was used in the main experiment, in which this dose was given in conjunction with saline, activated recombinant factor VII (rFVIIa, 150 μg/kg) or prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC, 40 units/kg), and the effects on traditional coagulation tests (PT and activated partial thromboplastin time), bleeding time, rotational thrombelastography, thrombin generation, and bleeding caused by a standardized liver and spleen incision were assessed. The attempt to measure “clinical” bleeding in this setting is a true and important novelty because previous studies were limited to in vitro
coagulation assays and bleeding time. The three main findings of the study by Godier et al
were (1) with the exception of the maximum clot firmness in rotational thrombelastography, all coagulation tests became clearly pathologic and bleeding caused by the standardized liver and spleen incision increased in rivaroxaban-treated rabbits compared with control animals; (2) the addition of rFVIIa and PCC partially normalized most coagulation test results; and (3) neither rFVIIa nor PCC reduced bleeding caused by the standardized liver and spleen incision in rabbits treated with high-dose rivaroxaban.
Rivaroxaban has a distinct effect on the results of most clinically used coagulation tests, including a significant prolongation of PT and activated thromboplastin time and thus a reduction of (functional) single-factor measurements performed in one of these test systems. Notably, these changes were measured after administration of only 10 mg rivaroxaban.8
In contrast, thrombin time, fibrinogen, factor XIII, and D-Dimers are not affected.8
The magnitude of this effect depends on the dose and time since the last rivaroxaban ingestion.9
In addition, thromboelastometry parameters are dose-dependently affected by rivaroxaban.10
The alterations in coagulation test results found by Godier et al
are similar. However, all these changes are not specific for rivaroxaban and thus are of limited value in the treatment of patients with acute bleeding. In contrast, in the absence of (low–molecular-weight) heparin, measuring anti-Xa activity might aid clinicians in deciding whether or not there is a rivaroxaban effect. Very low anti-Xa activity (e.g.
, <0.1 U/ml when using standard anti-Xa assays) suggests that there is no relevant rivaroxaban effect, whereas greater values suggest such an effect without directly quantifying it.
When evaluating the findings in the study of Godier et al
we need to keep in mind that the dose used in this animal model would be considered a massive overdose
of rivaroxaban in the clinical setting. The authors first established the minimum dose of rivaroxaban necessary to induce a clinical coagulopathy with increased bleeding caused by a standardized liver and spleen incision. The dose established and used for additional experiments was 5 mg/kg, which is 8–10 times greater than the highest daily dose used in any of the clinical (human) phase 3 trials. In contrast, the doses of rFVIIa and PCC were fixed, and both were in the high-normal range of clinically used doses. Therefore the inefficacy of both treatments in reducing the bleeding associated with a standardized liver and spleen incision may reflect a relative under-dosing of rFVIIa in PCC in this study.
The findings on reversing the anticoagulant effect of rivaroxaban in the study of Godier et al
are largely in keeping with the results of previous studies. Perzborn et al
. showed that rFVIIa partially restored thrombin generation in human platelet-rich plasma because higher doses of rivaroxaban were necessary for the same amount of thrombin inhibition if rFVIIa was present (as presented at the 21st Congress of the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Oxford, United Kingdom, August 2007). In rats treated with 2 mg/kg rivaroxaban, Tinel et al
. found that a supratherapeutic dose of rFVIIa (400 μg/kg) partially normalized PT and thrombin generation (as presented at the 21st Congress of the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Oxford, United Kingdom, August 2007). Finally, in baboons given 0.9 mg/kg rivaroxaban, Gruber et al
found that 210 μg/kg rFVIIa shortened bleeding time and PT by approximately 30%. Thus, we may speculate that rFVIIa may help to mitigate bleeding in patients treated with rivaroxaban outside the context of rivaroxaban overdose. The following seem reasonable hypotheses: the use of rFVIIa induces direct activation of FX to FXa, where the amount of FXa generated seems linear to the amount of rFVIIa12
; thus, in the presence of a given amount of a FXa inhibitor, the balance is shifted toward more available FXa and thus more thrombin generation, leading to increased soluble fibrin generation and increased cross-linking of fibrin monomers. In addition, an enhanced thrombin generation through the use of rFVIIa may increase platelet adhesion even in the presence of platelet defects.13
However, it must be recognized that these hypotheses have been generated from in vitro
Similarly, high-dose PCC (50 U/kg) partially normalized bleeding time and PT in rats treated with rivaroxaban (2 mg/kg), whereas low-dose PCC (25 U/kg) was ineffective.14
PCC is known to increase prothrombin conversion in addition to increasing factor concentrations through supplementation,15
although the exact mechanism behind this observation remains to be elucidated. The most important possibilities are replenishment of relatively deficient coagulation factors in an environment of an activated coagulation system and additional coagulation activation through already activated coagulation factors possibly present in the concentrate. In a study in volunteers given 20 mg rivaroxaban twice daily for 2.5 days, PCC (50 U/kg) immediately and completely normalized PT and the endogenous thrombin potential.16
This observation in humans is particularly important because the reversal potential of PCC was assessed in the high clinical dosing range of rivaroxaban. However, only the effect on PT and the endogenous thrombin potential were studied, not the direct effect on bleeding.
In conclusion, the study by Godier et al
is important because it allows hypothesizing that procoagulants such as PCC and rFVIIa may help to correct the coagulopathy in patients treated with factor Xa antagonists. However, the study was performed in the context of overdosing: the administration of procoagulants partially corrected coagulation test results but did not reduce bleeding caused by the standardized liver and spleen incision in an animal model. Thus, additional studies similar to the one by Godier et al
using rivaroxaban doses close to the ones used in the clinical setting are necessary to guide clinicians on how to specifically treat patients who have received novel anticoagulants.
Donat R. Spahn, M.D., F.R.C.A.,* Wolfgang Korte, M.D.† * Institute of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. email@example.com. † Center for Laboratory Medicine, St. Gallen Kantonsspital, St. Gallen, Switzerland, and University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland.
1. Levy JH, Key NS, Azran MS: Novel oral anticoagulants: Implications in the perioperative setting. ANESTHESIOLOGY 2010; 113:726–45
2. Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S, Eikelboom J, Oldgren J, Parekh A, Pogue J, Reilly PA, Themeles E, Varrone J, Wang S, Alings M, Xavier D, Zhu J, Diaz R, Lewis BS, Darius H, Diener HC, Joyner CD, Wallentin L, RE-LY Steering Committee and Investigators: Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2009; 361:1139–51
3. Eriksson BI, Borris LC, Friedman RJ, Haas S, Huisman MV, Kakkar AK, Bandel TJ, Beckmann H, Muehlhofer E, Misselwitz F, Geerts W, RECORD1 Study Group: Rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after hip arthroplasty. N Engl J Med 2008; 358:2765–75
4. Kakkar AK, Brenner B, Dahl OE, Eriksson BI, Mouret P, Muntz J, Soglian AG, Pap AF, Misselwitz F, Haas S, RECORD2 Investigators: Extended duration rivaroxaban versus short-term enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after total hip arthroplasty: A double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2008; 372:31–9
5. Lassen MR, Ageno W, Borris LC, Lieberman JR, Rosencher N, Bandel TJ, Misselwitz F, Turpie AG, RECORD3 Investigators: Rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after total knee arthroplasty. N Engl J Med 2008; 358:2776–86
6. Turpie AG, Lassen MR, Davidson BL, Bauer KA, Gent M, Kwong LM, Cushner FD, Lotke PA, Berkowitz SD, Bandel TJ, Benson A, Misselwitz F, Fisher WD, RECORD4 Investigators: Rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after total knee arthroplasty (RECORD4): A randomised trial. Lancet 2009; 373:1673–80
7. Godier A, Miclot A, Le Bonniec B, Durand M, Fischer AM, Emmerich J, Marchand-Leroux C, Lecompte T, Samama C-M: Evaluation of prothrombin complex concentrate and recombinant activated factor VII to reverse rivaroxaban in a rabbit model. ANESTHESIOLOGY 2012; 116:94–102
8. Asmis LM, Alberio L, Angelillo-Scherrer A, Korte W, Mendez A, Reber G, Seifert B, Stricker H, Tsakiris DA, Wuillemin WA: Rivaroxaban: Quantification by anti-FXa assay and influence on coagulation tests: A study in 9 Swiss laboratories. Thromb Res 2011, . [Epub ahead of print]
9. Mani H, Hesse C, Stratmann G, Lindhoff-Last E: Rivaroxaban differentially influences ex vivo global coagulation assays based on the administration time. Thromb Haemost 2011; 106:156–64
10. Samama MM, Guinet C, Le Flem L, Gerotziafas G: In vitro response of dabigatran and rivaroxabanon on thrombin generation (CAT) and fibrin formation (ROTEM). Paper presented at: 23rd Congress of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Kyoto, Japan, July 26, 2011; abstract P-TU-229
11. Gruber A, Marzec UM, Buetehorn U, Hanson S, Perzborn E: Potential of activated prothrombin complex concentrate and activated factor VII to reverse the anticoagulant effects of rivaroxaban in primates. Blood 2008; 112:3825
12. Monroe DM, Hoffman M, Oliver JA, Roberts HR: Platelet activity of high-dose factor VIIa is independent of tissue factor. Br J Haematol 1997; 99:542–7
13. Kjalke M, Ezban M, Monroe DM, Hoffman M, Roberts HR, Hedner U: High-dose factor VIIa increases initial thrombin generation and mediates faster platelet activation in thrombocytopenia-like conditions in a cell-based model system. Br J Haematol 2001; 114:114–20
14. Perzborn E, Tinel H: Prothrombin complex concentrate reverses the effects of high-dose rivaroxaban in rats. Paper presented at: 22nd Congress of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Boston, Massachusetts, July 13, 2009; abstract PP-MO-183
15. Staudinger T, Frass M, Rintelen C, Quehenberger P, Wagner O, Stoiser B, Locker GJ, Laczika K, Knapp S, Watzke H: Influence of prothrombin complex concentrates on plasma coagulation in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 1999; 25:1105–10
16. Eerenberg ES, Kamphuisen PW, Sijpkens MK, Meijers JC, Buller HR, Levi M: Reversal of rivaroxaban and dabigatran by prothrombin complex concentrate: A randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study in healthy subjects. Circulation 2011; 124:1573–9
© 2012 American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc.
Publication of an advertisement in Anesthesiology Online does not constitute endorsement by the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc. or Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. of the product or service being advertised.