p38 Mitogen–activated Protein Kinase Activation by Nerve Growth Factor in Primary Sensory Neurons Upregulates μ-Opioid Receptors to Enhance Opioid Responsiveness Toward Better Pain Control
Yamdeu, Reine-Solange M.S.*; Shaqura, Mohammed Ph.D.†; Mousa, Shaaban A. Ph.D.‡; Schäfer, Michael M.D., Ph.D.§; Droese, Jana Ph.D.†
Background: Sensory neuron opioid receptors are targets for spinal, epidural, and peripheral opioid application. Although local nerve growth factor (NGF) has been identified as a mediator of sensory neuron μ-opioid receptor (MOR) up-regulation, the signaling pathways involved have not been yet identified.
Methods: Wistar rats were treated with intraplantar vehicle, Freund's complete adjuvant, NGF, NGF plus intrathecal p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) inhibitors, or NGF plus extracellular signal–regulated kinase–1/2 MAPK inhibitors. After 4 days of treatment, paw pressure thresholds of an intraplantar full (fentanyl) or partial (buprenorphine) opioid agonist were determined by algesiometry. Tissue samples from rat dorsal root ganglia were subjected to radiolabeled ligand binding, Western blot analysis, and confocal immunofluorescence.
Results: Exogenous and endogenous NGF resulting from Freund's complete adjuvant inflammation produced significant potentiation and enhanced efficacy in fentanyl- and buprenorphine-induced dose-dependent antinociception, respectively. Furthermore, in the ipsilateral dorsal root ganglia, NGF produced a significant increase in MOR binding sites, proteins, and immunoreactive neurons. In parallel, phosphorylated p38-MAPK protein, the number of phosphorylated p38–MAPK immunoreactive neurons expressing MOR in dorsal root ganglia, and the peripherally directed axonal transport of MOR significantly increased. Finally, NGF-induced effects occurring in dorsal root ganglia, on axonal transport, and on the potentiation or enhanced efficacy of opioid antinociception were abrogated by inhibition of p38, but not extracellular signal–regulated kinase–1/2, MAPK.
Conclusions: Local NGF through activation of the p38-MAPK pathway leads to adaptive changes in sensory neuron MOR toward enhanced susceptibility to local opioids. This effect may act as a counter-regulatory response to p38-MAPK–induced pain (e.g., inflammatory pain) to facilitate opioid-mediated antinociception.
What We Already Know about This Topic
* Inflammation sensitizes nociceptive peripheral nerves, in part, by increasing nerve growth factor release—but nerve growth factor also increases their expression of μ-opioid receptors.
What This Article Tells Us That Is New
* In rats, peripheral inflammation increased μ-opioid receptor expression in nociceptive peripheral nerves by nerve growth factor activation of p38-mitogen–activated protein kinase.
DAILY clinical practice shows that opioids are the most effective and widely used drugs in the treatment of severe pain (e.g
., acute postoperative pain, chronic cancer-related pain).1,2
Most opioids are administered systemically, passing the blood-brain barrier to activate corresponding opioid receptors in pain-related brain areas.3
However, opioids are also effective on the central terminals of peripheral sensory neurons via
intrathecal or epidural delivery.4,5
Likewise, they are effective at the peripheral terminals of sensory neurons via
local or topical application.6
It has been shown that the μ-opioid receptor (MOR) is expressed mainly in cell bodies of nociceptive C and AΔ neurons within dorsal root ganglia (DRG).7–9
In addition, there is growing evidence that inflammatory pain increases MOR expression in these neurons,10–12
resulting in enhanced axonal transport of receptors from the DRG toward nerve terminals of sensory neurons.13,14
This up-regulation in MOR expression occurs exclusively in ipsilateral DRG, suggesting that local (but not systemic) inflammatory mediators regulate opioid receptor expression of peripheral sensory neurons.13
It is well established that nerve growth factor (NGF), interleukin-1, and other inflammatory mediators can affect the phenotype of nociceptive neurons by increased expression of neuropeptides, such as substance P and calcitonin gene–related peptide (CGRP),15–18
as well as receptors and ion channels, such as transient receptor potential channel, vanilloid subfamily member 1, acid-sensing ion channel receptors, and purinoreceptors.19–21
This inflammatory-associated neuroplasticity is the consequence of a combination of activity-dependent changes and specific signal-transduction pathways, which phosphorylate cellular proteins, activate transcription factors, and finally alter gene expression.22
Several studies have investigated the signal-transduction pathways that are mainly involved in this enhanced expression.19,21,23
However, little is known about the signaling pathways responsible for the regulation of sensory neuron opioid receptor expression during painful conditions, such as inflammatory pain.
Mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK) transduce extracellular stimuli into intracellular responses and, thereby, induce changes in transcription and posttranslational modifications of target proteins.24
p38 MAPK and extracellular signal–regulated kinase (ERK) 1/2 are activated in primary sensory neurons after peripheral inflammation.25,26
A recent study demonstrated that the transient receptor potential ion channel, vanilloid subfamily member 1, is regulated by NGF-induced activation of the ERK pathway in DRG neurons in vitro
Moreover, Ji et al
showed that p38-MAPK activation in the DRG is responsible for the inflammation-induced transient receptor potential ion channel, vanilloid subfamily member 1, up-regulation, and hyperalgesia. In addition, p38 MAPK is involved in substance P and N
-methyl-d-aspartate receptor–induced pain sensitivity as well as the regulation of cyclooxygenase-2 up-regulation and prostaglandin E2 release in the spinal cord.28
Because NGF has been implicated in the up-regulation of the number and efficacy of sensory neuron MOR, resulting in enhanced analgesic effects of opioids,13
we set out to identify the NGF-dependent signaling pathways. Therefore, we examined whether: (1) exogenous as well as endogenous NGF, raised by Freund's complete adjuvant (FCA), contributes to enhanced antinociception of a full (fentanyl) or partial (buprenorphine) opioid agonist; (2) NGF-dependent increases in MOR binding, protein, and immunoreactive cells in peripheral sensory neurons are abolished by p38 MAPK and/or ERK-1/2 inhibition; (3) the number of immunoreactive MOR neuronal cells colocalizing with activated p-p38 MAPK within DRG neurons is increased after intraplantar NGF but return to baseline levels after concomitant intrathecal inhibition of p38 and/or ERK-1/2 MAPK; (4) local NGF enhances the anterograde axonal transport of MOR along the sciatic nerve via
activation of p38 MAPK and/or ERK 1/2; (5) NGF-induced enhanced antinociceptive effects of local opioids are abolished by intrathecal inhibition of p38 and/or ERK-1/2 MAPK.
Materials and Methods
Experiments were conducted in male Wistar rats (200–250 g) housed in cages lined with ground corncob bedding. Rats were kept in climate- and light-controlled rooms (22 ± 0.5°C; relative humidity, 60–65%; 12-h light/dark cycle) with standard rodent food pellets and water ad libitum
. Experiments were performed in accordance with The Development of Science-based Guidelines for Laboratory Animal Care∥
and were approved by the local animal care committee (Landesamt für Arbeitsschutz, Gesundheitsschutz und technische Sicherheit, LAGetSi, Berlin, Germany). All efforts were made to minimize the number of animals used and their suffering.
Intrathecal Catheter Implantation
Intrathecal catheters were used according to previously published protocols.29
In brief, animals were anesthetized with isoflurane in oxygen via
nose cone. A longitudinal skin incision was made in the lumbar region directly above the spinous processes of the L4–L6 vertebrae. The needle, through which the catheter was set up, was inserted at a 30° angle between the L5 and L6 vertebra. The catheter (PE10, 15 cm, 0.61-mm OD; Portex Ltd, Hythe, Kent, United Kingdom) was carefully advanced while rotating it between the thumb and forefinger. This rotation facilitated the penetration through the intervertebral space and dura. Dura penetration was observed by movement of the tail and hind limbs. The catheter was then carefully pushed upward 1–2 cm into the intrathecal space. The needle was then carefully removed before the catheter was fixed with glue to the tissue and secured with two additional sutures. Another skin incision was made at the dorsal neck, where the catheter was tunneled under the skin and pulled out at the neck before suture. Intrathecal catheter location was confirmed after surgery by administration of 10 μl lidocaine, 2%. Lidocaine caused 10–15 min of bilateral hind limb paresis whereas no deficits occurred in animals injected with sterile phosphate buffered saline (PBS). Animals were allowed to recover for at least 2 days before experiments. Only animals exhibiting no motor deficits were used for further testing.
FCA, a water-in-oil emulsion with killed mycobacteria (Calbiochem, San Diego, CA) was injected (150 μl) intraplantarly. Affinity-purified polyclonal rabbit anti-NGF antiserum (CEDARLANE, Burlington, Ontario, Canada) was dissolved in PBS at 8 μg/100 μl. The first and intraplantar injection was administered 30 min before FCA.13
According to a previous protocol,30
the β subunit of NGF (β-NGF; R&D Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, MN) was reconstituted in sterile PBS at 4 μg/100 μl and injected intraplantarly once daily for 4 consecutive days. According to manufacturer instructions, the p38-MAPK inhibitor 4-(4-fluorophenyl)-2-(4-methylsulfonylphenyl)-5-(4-pyridyl)-1H-imidazole (SB203580) and the MEK/ERK-1/2 inhibitor 2′-amino-3′-methoxyflavone (PD98059; Calbiochem) were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide diluted with sterile distilled water to a final concentration of 2%. Twice before removal of DRG, intrathecal boluses (1 μg/10 μl) were injected for each drug.17,31
The first injection was delivered 30 min before intraplantar NGF. For 96-h experiments, mini-pumps (1 μg/1 μl; delivery rate 0.5 μl/h; ALZET Osmotic Pumps, Cupertino, CA) were filled with drugs or vehicle, implanted subcutaneously, and attached to anchored intrathecal catheters.29,32
-(1-phenethyl-4-piperidyl) propionanilide citrate (1:1) or buprenorphine hydrochloride (21-(cyclopropyl-7α-[(S)-1-hydroxy-1,2,2-trimethylpropyl]-6,14-endo-ethano-6,7,8,14-tetrahydrooripavine hydrochloride) (Sigma-Aldrich, Taufkirchen, Germany) were dissolved in isotonic saline at different concentrations before application.
Rats were divided into nine groups with six to eight animals per group. The first group was treated with intraplantar FCA for 96 h. The second group of rats received intraplantar FCA plus intraplantar affinity-purified anti-NGF antiserum 30 min before FCA and then every 12 h. The third group, which served as a control, was injected intraplantar with isotonic saline. The fourth group received intraplantar NGF once daily for 1 or 4 days (24 or 96 h). The fifth group received intraplantar NGF and intrathecal SB203580. The sixth group received intraplantar NGF and intrathecal PD98059.
The dose of each MAPK inhibitor was selected based on previously published experimental protocols.19,31
For visualization of anterograde axonally transported MOR, rats from the last three groups also received a tight ligation of the sciatic nerve at the midthigh level 24 h after the onset of treatment under isoflurane anesthesia and were sacrificed 24 h later.13,14
Taken together, all experimental groups were tested at 24 h for changes at the level of the DRG, at 48 h for changes at the level of the sciatic nerve, and at 96 h (4 days) for behavioral changes at the level of the hind paw after local NGF treatment to examine consecutive changes along the peripheral sensory neuron.
At 96 h after treatment initiation, paw pressure threshold (PPT) was assessed using an algesiometer (modified Randall-Selitto test; Ugo Basile, Comerio, Italy) before (baseline) and after intraplantar injection of two different MOR opioid agonists: the full opioid agonist fentanyl (0–1.2 μg/100 μl) and the partial opioid agonist buprenorphine (1–5 μg/100 μl). Animals were gently restrained under paper wadding. Using a wedge-shaped, blunt piston, incremental pressure was applied on the dorsal surface of the hind paw by means of an automated gauge. The pressure required to elicit paw withdrawal, the PPT (250-g cutoff), was determined by averaging three consecutive trials separated by 10 s. The sequence of left and right paws was alternated among animals to preclude order effects. The experimenter was blind to group assignment.
Western Blot Analysis
At 24 h after treatment initiation, animals from the different groups were sacrificed. Ipsilateral L3–L5 DRGs were immediately removed, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80°C. Western blot analysis was performed as previously described by Ji and Rupp.33
In brief, samples were homogenized in boiling sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide sample buffer (100 mM Tris-hydrochloric acid, 2% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 20% glycerol). Protein concentration was measured using bicinchoninic acid assay (Pierce BCA Protein Assay; Pierce Biotechnology, Inc., Rockford, IL). 2-Mercaptoethanol and bromphenol blue were added before loading. Extracts were separated using 10% (MOR) or 12% (p38, p-p38, ERK 1/2) sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis 60-μg protein per lane and transferred onto nitrocellulose filters. Filters were blocked in 5% milk for 1 h and incubated with the following antibodies at 4°C overnight: rabbit polyclonal MOR antiserum (1:1,000 in 5% bicinchoninic acid; Gramsch Laboratories, Schwabhausen, Germany), rabbit polyclonal antiphospho-p44/p42 MAPK (p-ERK 1/2, 1:500), mouse monoclonal anti-p38 MAPK (1:1,000), and antiphospho-p38 MAPK (p-p38 MAPK, 1:500; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., Beverly, MA). After incubation at room temperature for 2 h with secondary antibodies, specifically peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit (1:5,000; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech Europe, Freiburg, Germany) and rabbit anti-mouse (1:5,000; Abcam, Cambridge, MA), reactive bands were visualized in enhanced chemiluminescence solutions (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech Europe) for 1 min and immediately exposed to autoradiograph film for 5–20 min. Finally, blots were incubated in stripping buffer (62.6 mM Tris-hydrochloric acid [pH 6.7], 2% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 100 mM mercaptoethanol) at 56°C for 30 min and reprobed with monoclonal mouse anti–β-actin antibody (1:10,000; Sigma-Aldrich) as a loading control. These experiments were performed in duplicate and carried out three times.
Western blot bands of MOR, p38, and p-p38 MAPK were then quantified using an open-source image software program (Java Image; ImageJ#
The area and density of pixels within the threshold values representing immunoreactivity were measured. The integrated density (i.e
., the product of the area and mean of gray value) was calculated. Integrated immunodensities of controls and treated groups were compared and analyzed.
Opioid Receptor Binding
At 24 h after treatment initiation, animals from the different groups were killed by an overdose of isoflurane. The lumbar (L3–L5) DRG ipsilateral to the NGF-injected hind paw were removed. Membranes were obtained from DRGs as previously described.35
In brief, the tissue was placed immediately on ice in cold assay buffer (50 mM Tris-hydrochloric acid, 1 mM EGTA, 5 mM MgCl2
[pH 7.4]). Tissue was homogenized (POLYTRON; Kinematica, Littau, Switzerland) and centrifuged at 48,000g
at 4°C for 20 min. The pellet was resuspended in assay buffer after 10-min incubation at 37°C to remove endogenous ligands. The homogenate was centrifuged at 42,000g
and resuspended in assay buffer. Membranes were aliquoted and stored at −80°C. DRG membranes were diluted in assay buffer. Specific binding of [3
H]DAMGO (DAMGO = [D-Ala2, N-MePhe4, Gly-ol]-enkephalin) was performed by incubating 100 μg membrane protein with 2 nM [3
H]DAMGO in the presence or absence of 10 μM unlabeled naloxone to determine nonspecific binding. Membranes were incubated at 22°C for 1 h in assay buffer. Reactions were terminated by rapid filtration under vacuum through Whatman grade GF/B glass fiber filters followed by four washes with cold buffer (50 mM Tris-hydrochloric acid [pH 7.4]). Bound radioactivity was determined by liquid scintillation spectrophotometry (PerkinElmer, Inc., Rodgau, Germany) at 60% counter efficiency after overnight extraction of the filters in 3 ml scintillation fluid.35
All experiments were performed in duplicate and carried out three times.
For visualization of anterograde axonally transported MOR with CGRP along the sciatic nerve, immunohistochemistry was done 48 h after treatment initiation and 24 h after nerve ligation. However, for visualization of MOR with p-p38 MAPK in DRG, immunohistochemistry was done at 24 h after treatment initiation. Rats were deeply anesthetized with isoflurane and transcardially perfused with 100 ml PBS (pH 7.4) and 500 ml paraformaldehyde, 4% w/v, in phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). After perfusion, the DRG and the ligated sciatic nerve (0.5 cm) were removed from treated and control animals, postfixed in the same fixatives for 90 min, and then cryoprotected at 4°C overnight in PBS with 10% sucrose. The DRG or sciatic nerve was embedded in Tissue-Tek OCT compound (Bayer Corporation, Pittsburgh, PA), frozen, and cut into 8-μm sections.
DRG or sciatic nerve–mounted tissue sections were incubated with the following rabbit primary antibodies: rabbit polyclonal MOR antibody (1:1,000; Gramsch Laboratories) alone or in combination with mouse monoclonal p38-MAPK antibody (1:1,000), mouse monoclonal p-p38-MAPK antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.), or guinea pig polyclonal antibody against CGRP (1:1,000; Peninsula Laboratories, Belmont, CA). Tissue sections were washed with PBS and incubated with the appropriate secondary antibodies: Texas red conjugated goat anti-rabbit antibody alone or in combination with fluorescein isothiocyanate conjugated donkey anti-mouse or anti–guinea pig antibody. Finally, tissues were washed in PBS, mounted on VECTASHIELD (Vector Laboratories, Inc., Burlingame, CA), and viewed under a laser-scanning microscope (LSM 510; Carl Zeiss MicroImaging, Göttingen, Germany).
To demonstrate staining specificity, the following controls were included as detailed elsewhere: (1) preabsorption of antibody against MOR with a synthetic peptide for MOR (Gramsch Laboratories) at 4°C for 24 h; (2) omission of either the primary antisera, the secondary antibodies, or the avidin-biotin complex; (3) omission of either the first or second primary antibody and either the first or second secondary antibody.13
Quantification of Immunostaining
The method of quantification for DRG staining has been detailed elsewhere.9,13,36
In brief, every fourth section of DRG that was serially cut at 10 μm for each animal (n
= 5) was stained. For neuron counting, only those immunostained neurons containing a distinct nucleus were counted for a total of a minimum of 400 neurons using the microscope (×40). After MOR immunostaining, the total number of immunoreactive MOR neurons was counted by an observer blinded to the experimental protocol. This number was divided by the total number of neurons in each DRG section, and the percentage was calculated. The immunoreactive MOR neurons, which were also immunoreactive for p-p38 MAPK, were counted. The proportion was calculated as a percentage of the total number of immunoreactive MOR neurons in each DRG section and represented as percentages for vehicle (NGF vs
. NGF/p38-MAPK inhibitor–treated animals). Data were obtained from four sections of each DRG and five rats per group.
For quantification of MOR immunoreactivity at the ligated area of the sciatic nerve, images of red (Texas red) immunofluorescence were obtained using a laser scanning microscope laser-scanning microscope (Carl Zeiss MicroImaging). To quantify changes in immunodensities, Modular Image-Analysis software was applied (version 2.5 [service pack 2]; Carl Zeiss MicroImaging).13,37
The settings of the confocal microscope were established using a control section and kept unchanged for all subsequent image acquisitions. Six to eight images were sampled per animal. Images were thresholded to exclude background fluorescence. They were gated to include intensity measurements only from positively stained cells. For images analysis, a standardized box was positioned over the proximal part of the ligated sciatic nerve of all groups to determine the mean product of the area (μm2
) and the mean intensity of pixels within the threshold value as well as to calculate the integrated optical intensity (product of area and mean intensity). Five rats per group were used for analysis.
The results of behavioral experiments are given as mean ± SD or SEM of the percentage of maximum possible effect (% MPE) according to the following formula: (PPTpostinjection − PPTbasal)/(250cut-off − PPTbasal). All statistics (two-tailed testing) were performed using STAT software (version 2.03; SPSS Science Software, Chicago, IL). Data were compared by a one-way or two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) if the normality test passed (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test). Otherwise, the Kruskal-Wallis test was used. Post hoc multiple pair-wise comparisons were performed by the Newman-Keuls test. Data of two groups were compared using the unpaired Student t test. For the analysis of behavioral dose-dependent effects, a linear regression ANOVA was applied. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Sensory Neuron NGF-dependent Enhancement of Antinociceptive Effects
In PBS-treated Wistar rats, intraplantar injection of the full MOR agonist fentanyl (0.5–1.0 μg) elicited a significant and dose-dependent increase in PPT consistent with the development of dose-dependent antinociception (fig. 1A
< 0.05, linear regression one-way ANOVA, n = 6–8). In rats with FCA hind paw inflammation, the dose-response curve elicited by 0.5–1.0 μg fentanyl significantly shifted to the left, toward enhanced potency. Immunoneutralization of endogenous NGF in FCA-inflamed hindpaws reversed this leftward shift in potency (P
< 0.05, two-way ANOVA, Newman-Keuls, n = 6–8). In contrast, pretreatment of naive rats with exogenous NGF resulted in a similar leftward shift toward enhanced potency of intraplantar fentanyl (fig. 1B
). In PBS- treated Wistar rats, intraplantar injection of the partial opioid agonist buprenorphine (1–5 μg) did not increase PPT consistent with a lack of peripheral efficacy (fig. 1C
), although higher doses revealed systemic antinociceptive effects (data not shown). In rats with FCA hind paw inflammation, administration of buprenorphine (1–5 μg) significantly and dose-dependently increased PPT (P
< 0.05, linear regression one-way ANOVA, n = 6–8). However, the maximum peripheral antinociceptive effects of buprenorphine were lower than those elicited by fentanyl. Immunoneutralization of NGF in FCA-treated rat hindpaws significantly abolished the antinociceptive efficacy elicited by buprenorphine (P
< 0.05, two-way ANOVA, Newman-Keuls, n = 6–8). In contrast, pretreatment of naive rats with exogenous NGF resulted in a similar degree of enhanced efficacy of intraplantar fentanyl (fig. 1D
Activation of p38 MAPK Mediates NGF-dependent Increases of MOR Binding Sites, Immunoreactive Cells, and Protein
H]DAMGO binding sites were evaluated in the DRGs of rats treated with intraplantar NGF with or without intrathecal p38-MAPK inhibitor SB203580 or MEK/ERK-1/2 inhibitor PD98059 compared with vehicle. Twenty-four hours after NGF treatment, the number of [3
H]DAMGO binding sites in DRG was significantly increased compared with that of vehicle-treated rats (fig. 2A
< 0.05; one-way ANOVA, Newman-Keuls, n = 6). This increase in MOR-specific [3
H]DAMGO binding sites induced by NGF was significantly reversed after intrathecal p38-MAPK inhibitor SB203580 (P
< 0.05; one-way ANOVA, Newman-Keuls, n = 6), but not after intrathecal MEK/ERK-1/2 inhibitor PD98059.
Analysis of MOR immunofluorescence staining showed a significant up-regulation in the percentage of immunoreactive MOR cells in DRG (40.2 ± 7.3%,) 24 h after local administration of NGF in comparison with vehicle-treated animals (32.1 ± 6.2%). Intrathecal application of the p38-MAPK inhibitor SB203580 (27.7 ± 4.6%) significantly reduced the percentage of immunoreactive MOR cells in comparison with NGF-treated animals (fig. 2B
< 0.05; one-way ANOVA, Newman-Keuls, n = 20).
Western blot analysis of DRG tissue extracts of control animals revealed immunoreactive MOR protein bands at the expected molecular weight of 50 kDa (fig. 2C
). Twenty-four hours after intraplantar NGF treatment, the integrated optical density of immunoreactive MOR protein bands was increased by 67% compared with that of vehicle-treated animals (P
< 0.05; one-way ANOVA, Newman-Keuls, n = 6). This increase was again prevented after intrathecal administration of p38-MAPK inhibitor SB203580 (P
< 0.05; one-way ANOVA, Newman-Keuls, n = 6).
In parallel, at 24 h after NGF treatment, the integrated optical density of immunoreactive phosphorylated p-p38–MAPK protein bands at the expected molecular weight of 43 kDa increased eightfold compared with that of vehicle-treated animals (fig. 2D
< 0.05; one-way ANOVA, Newman-Keuls, n = 6). This increase was reduced 5.6-fold by intrathecal administration of p38-MAPK inhibitor SB203580 (P
< 0.05; one-way ANOVA, Newman-Keuls, n = 6).
In contrast, the integrated optical density of total immunoreactive p38-MAPK protein bands at the expected molecular weight of 38 kDa increased slightly by 0.4-fold in NGF-treated animals compared with vehicle-treated animals and did not change significantly after intrathecal treatment with p38-MAPK inhibitor SB203580 (fig. 2E
> 0.05, one-way ANOVA, Newman-Keuls, n = 6).
NGF-dependent Increase in Phosphorylated p-p38 MAPK of MOR-expressing Neurons is Prevented
Double confocal immunofluorescence microscopy of MOR and phosphorylated p-p38 MAPK in DRG of control animals showed immunoreactive MOR neurons (51.1 ± 2.2%) colocalizing with phosphorylated p-p38 MAPK, although some neurons expressed MOR (48.9 ± 2.2%) alone (figs. 3A, B, and C
). Twenty-four hours after intraplantar NGF treatment, the percentage of immunoreactive MOR neurons colocalizing with phosphorylated p-p38 MAPK increased significantly (83.2 ± 3.5%) compared with that of vehicle-treated animals (figs. 3A, B, C, D, E, and F
< 0.05, one-way ANOVA, Newman-Keuls, n = 20). This NGF-induced elevation in MOR colocalization with p-p38 MAPK in DRG neurons (55 ± 2.9%) was significantly attenuated after intrathecal p38-MAPK inhibitor SB203580 (figs. 3G, H, and I
< 0.05, one-way ANOVA, Newman-Keuls, n = 20).
Activation of p38 MAPK Mediates NGF-dependent Increases in the Axonal Transport of Sciatic Nerve MOR
Double confocal immunofluorescence microscopy examined the axonal MOR immunoreactivity proximal to a sciatic nerve ligature in rats treated with intraplantar vehicle (figs. 4A, B, and C
), NGF (figs. 4D, E, and F
), or NGF with intrathecal p38-MAPK inhibitor SB20358 (figs. 4G, H, and I
). In vehicle-treated rats, MOR immunoreactivity expressed in CGRP nerve fibers accumulated mainly proximal to the ligature of the sciatic nerve. Compared with vehicle-treated animals, intraplantar NGF treatment induced a 44% increase in axonally transported MOR immunoreactivity on CGRP nerve fibers proximal to the ligature (P
< 0.05, one-way ANOVA, Newman-Keuls, n = 30). Intrathecal pretreatment with the p38-MAPK inhibitor SB20358 prevented this increase in axonally transported MOR of immunoreactive CGRP nerve fibers (P
< 0.05, one-way ANOVA, Newman-Keuls, n = 30).
Activation of p38 MAPK Mediates NGF-dependent Increases in Enhanced Antinociceptive Effects
Intraplantar NGF-dependent potentiation of intraplantar fentanyl antinociception was reversed after intrathecal administration of the p38-MAPK inhibitor SB203580 (P
< 0.05; two-way ANOVA, n = 6–8), but not after the MEK/ERK-1/2 inhibitor PD98059 (figs. 5A and B
). NGF-dependent enhanced efficacy of intraplantar buprenorphine antinociception was inhibited after intrathecal administration of the p38-MAPK inhibitor SB203580 (P
< 0.05; two-way ANOVA, n = 6–8), but not after the MEK/ERK-1/2 inhibitor PD98059 (figs. 5C and D
). It is noteworthy that intraplantar NGF immediately decreased PPT (i.e
., hyperalgesia) when compared with vehicle-treated animals (table 1
). However, this hyperalgesia was reversed by intrathecal administration of p38-MAPK inhibitor SB203580, but not MEK/ERK-1/2 inhibitor PD98059.
The major finding of this study is that exogenous and endogenously up-regulated NGF, through activation of the p38-MAPK pathway, contributes to adaptive changes of the sensory neuron opioid system toward enhanced susceptibility to local opioids. This effect is established in five ways: (1) a potentiation of dose-dependent local antinociceptive effects of the full opioid agonist fentanyl as well as an enhanced antinociceptive efficacy of the partial opioid agonist buprenorphine 96 h after increased local NGF; (2) at 24 h, NGF treatment up-regulation of MOR in DRG ipsilateral to local NGF and its attenuation by intrathecal application of a p38-MAPK, but not a MEK/ERK-1/2, inhibitor; (3) increased phosphorylation and, thus, activation of p38 MAPK and its enhanced colocalization in immunoreactive MOR neurons of DRG 24 h after local NGF treatment; (4) increased anterograde axonal transport of MOR along the sciatic nerve 48 h after local NGF and its inhibition by intrathecal p38-MAPK inhibitor; (5) reversal of the NGF-induced enhanced antinociceptive effects of local opioids by intrathecal application of a p38-MAPK, but not a MEK/ERK-1/2, inhibitor.
In the present study, we examined whether endogenously increased NGF in inflamed paws, or exogenously applied intraplantar NGF, leads to enhanced antinociceptive effects of local opioids. Intraplantar injection of low, systemically inactive doses of the full MOR agonist fentanyl elicits dose-dependent antinociceptive effects in normal rats. In rats treated with intraplantar NGF or FCA, the dose-dependent antinociceptive effects of fentanyl shift to the left, indicating a potentiation. Moreover, intraplantar anti-NGF reversed this potentiation in FCA-induced inflammatory pain, suggesting a role of endogenous NGF that is commonly known to be up-regulated during FCA inflammation.38
Consistent with a required higher receptor occupancy for partial opioid agonists39,40
than for full agonists (e.g
., fentanyl) and a relatively low maximal number of MOR binding sites in DRG of normal rats,41
peripheral administration of buprenorphine did not show antinociceptive efficacy in untreated rats. However, after local FCA or NGF treatment, intraplantar buprenorphine elicited significant and dose-dependent antinociceptive effects. However, these effects remained small compared with those observed for intraplantar fentanyl. The potentiation in the antinociception of the full opioid agonist fentanyl and the rise in the antinociceptive efficacy of the partial opioid agonist buprenorphine strongly suggest an increase in the number of MOR. Indeed, Western blot analysis of MOR receptor protein, MOR-specific [3
H]DAMGO binding sites, and the number of immunoreactive MOR cells in DRG showed a significant up-regulation after local FCA or NGF treatment. These findings are consistent with those of Mousa et al
and other reports,42,43
showing an up-regulation of MOR in NGF-overexpressing transgenic mice. These findings are also consistent with a report by Cahill et al
which showed that intrathecal application of NGF can rescue the reduced opioid responsiveness seen in neuropathic pain.
We extended these investigations to identify the NGF-dependent signaling pathways responsible for the up-regulation of sensory neuron opioid receptor expression and efficacy. Increased concentrations of endogenous NGF during inflammatory pain and exogenously applied NGF are known to bind to its receptors TrkA and p75.45
They are then retrogradely transported as early endosomes to the cell somata of sensory neurons within the DRG.45
These NGF TrkA-carrying early endosomes also colocalize the signaling proteins p38 MAPK and ERK 1/2,45
which are involved in different pain conditions.46
In Western blot analysis, the NGF-induced up-regulation of MOR receptor proteins was concomitant with a 5.6-fold increase in phosphorylated (i.e
., activated) p-p38 MAPK in DRG. However, total p38 MAPK increased only slightly and not at a statistically significant level. Moreover, intrathecal administration of the p38-MAPK inhibitor SB203580—but not the MEK/ERK-1/2 inhibitor PD98059—reversed NGF-induced increases in MOR receptor proteins, MOR-specific [3
H]DAMGO binding sites, and the number of immunoreactive MOR cells in DRG. Therefore, our findings suggest that the p38-MAPK–signaling pathway mainly contributes to the NGF-dependent up-regulation of sensory neuron MOR. These results are in line with previous studies19
that showed increased activation of p38 MAPK after local NGF. However, the increased activation of p38 MAPK may also lead to enhanced nociception—most likely via
an increased number of ion channels, such as capsaicin receptor TRPV1—in painful conditions.19,46
In line with this theory, intraplantar NGF produced hyperalgesia in our study, as reflected by diminished PPT when compared with vehicle-treated animals (table 1
). Hyperalgesia was attenuated after intrathecal application of the p38-MAPK inhibitor SB203580. However, our results support the notion that, in parallel to enhanced hyperalgesia through p38-MAPK activation, adaptive changes occur within sensory neurons toward an up-regulation in MOR number and efficacy—resulting in enhanced opioid susceptibility and pain control.13
This conclusion was confirmed in double confocal immunofluorescence microscopy, which demonstrated an increase in the number of immunoreactive MOR neurons colocalizing with phosphorylated (i.e
., activated) p38 MAPK, an effect that was suppressed by the intrathecal p38-MAPK inhibitor SB203580. In line with other studies,19
this NGF-induced increase in p38-MAPK activation was restricted to small and medium size DRG neurons, most of which were nociceptors. This result indicates that p38-MAPK activation in DRG neurons is not a universal response of neurons to stress. Instead, it is restricted to nociceptive NGF-responsive and TrkA-expressing neurons.13
Together, these results suggest that NGF, through the activation of the p38-MAPK pathway, contributes to enhanced expression of MOR within primary afferent sensory neurons. It is noteworthy that intrathecal administration of the MEK/ERK-1/2 inhibitor PD98059 had no effect on NGF-induced up-regulation of sensory neuron MOR, although the literature26,47
has shown that, under these conditions, sensory neuron ERK-1/2 is activated.
How might up-regulation in the number of sensory neuron MOR be mechanistically explained? One possible mechanism is that p38 MAPK increases transcription of MOR in DRG neurons. In previous work,11
we observed a moderate increase in MOR messenger RNA (mRNA) 1–2 h after intraplantar FCA. However, a lack of changes in MOR mRNA does not rule out possible changes in MOR receptor proteins.10
Although some studies48–50
have investigated possible transcription factors that regulate MOR expression, many were performed using cell lines that endogenously express MOR. Up-regulation of MOR mRNA in human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells after interleukin-6 stimulation was dependent on the transcription factors STAT1 and STAT 3.48
Recent studies showed that p38 MAPK is involved in the activation of STATs49
It is noteworthy that phosphorylation of STAT3 and CREB are increased in mouse DRGs after peripheral inflammation.51
Alternatively, p38 MAPK has been shown to regulate protein expression under inflammatory conditions by mRNA stabilization. Unstable mRNAs often contain AU-rich elements in their 3′-untranslated region. (Au refers to nucleic acid bases adenin, uracil.) The characteristic motif is AUUUA. The AU-rich element–regulated mRNA stability is mediated by RNA-binding proteins, such as human antigen R. In response to proinflammatory stimuli, HuR has been shown to increase the mRNA stability of tumor necrosis factor-α, cyclooxygenase-2, and interleukin 8 in a p38-MAPK–dependent manner.52–55
This p38-MAPK dependence was blocked by use of the p38-inhibitor SB203580. The 3′-untranslated region of human and mouse MOR contains several AU-rich elements56
that regulate MOR expression.57,58
Opioid receptors synthesized in DRG neurons undergo anterograde axonal transport toward peripheral nerve terminals. This process leads to enhanced density of opioid receptors on cutaneous nerve fibers.13,14,59,60
Therefore, we examined whether the peripherally directed axonal transport of MOR is affected by NGF with or without intrathecal p38-MAPK inhibition. Double confocal immunofluorescence microscopy of MOR and immunoreactive CGRP neurons in the ligated sciatic nerve showed a significant increase of MOR after intraplantar NGF accumulating proximal to the ligature. This increase in axonally transported MOR was attenuated by intrathecal injection of the p38-MAPK inhibitor SB203580. These findings suggest that NGF enhanced the axonal transport of sensory neuron MOR toward the peripheral subcutaneous tissue through activation of the p38-MAPK pathway.
Finally, we examined whether NGF-induced MOR up-regulation in peripheral sensory neurons and enhanced antinociceptive effects of local opioids are mediated through the activation of the p38 or ERK-1/2 MAPK pathway. Axonal transport of MOR from the DRG toward peripheral nerve terminals requires a delay of approximately 2 days after FCA or NGF treatment.13,14
Indeed, our previous work13
showed a significant increase in immunoreactive MOR nerve fibers within the layers of the epidermis 96 h after intraplantar NGF, coinciding with the potentiation of opioid-mediated antinociception. Therefore, algesiometric experiments were performed 96 h after NGF treatment. Our current investigation found that, whereas the potentiation of dose-dependent antinociceptive effects of the full opioid agonist fentanyl was reversed by a rightward shift in the dose-response curve, the enhanced antinociceptive efficacy of the partial opioid agonist buprenorphine was abolished by intrathecal injection of the p38-MAPK inhibitor SB203580—but not the MEK/ERK-1/2 inhibitor PD98059. Thus, consistent with NGF-induced sensory neuron MOR up-regulation through p38-MAPK activation, p38-MAPK inhibition prevented the enhanced antinociceptive effects of local opioids.
In summary, we have shown that exogenous and endogenously up-regulated NGF, through activation of the p38-MAPK pathway, lead to adaptive changes in sensory neuron opioid receptors toward enhanced susceptibility to local opioids. After intraplantar NGF treatment, this effect occurs in three consecutive steps: increased MOR in DRG at 24 h, increased axonal MOR transport at 48 h, and increased MOR density at 96 h. Consequently, dose-dependent peripheral antinociceptive effects of locally applied full opioid agonists such as fentanyl are potentiated and those of partial opioid agonists such as buprenorphine are enhanced in efficacy which is reversed by intrathecal p38-MAPK inhibitor SB203580. This mechanism may act as a counter-regulatory response to p38-MAPK–induced painful conditions, such as inflammatory pain, to facilitate exogenously or endogenously mediated opioid antinociception.
The authors thank Claudia Spies, M.D. (Chairwoman and Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité University Berlin, Berlin, Germany), for her continuous support. They also gratefully acknowledge Petra von Kwiatkowski, B.Sc. (Technician, Berlin, Germany), and Ute Oedekoven, B.Sc. (Graphic Designer, Berlin, Germany), for their technical assistance.
1.White PF, Kehlet H: Improving postoperative pain management: What are the unresolved issues? Anesthesiology 2010; 112:220–5
2.de Leon-Casasola OA: Current developments in opioid therapy for management of cancer pain. Clin J Pain 2008; 24:S3–7
3.Henriksen G, Willoch F: Imaging of opioid receptors in the central nervous system. Brain 2008; 131:1171–96
4.Joshi GP, Bonnet F, Shah R, Wilkinson RC, Camu F, Fischer B, Neugebauer EA, Rawal N, Schug SA, Simanski C, Kehlet H: A systematic review of randomized trials evaluating regional techniques for postthoracotomy analgesia. Anesth Analg 2008; 107:1026–40
5.Yaksh TL, Horais KA, Tozier NA, Allen JW, Rathbun M, Rossi SS, Sommer C, Meschter C, Richter PJ, Hildebrand KR: Chronically infused intrathecal morphine in dogs. Anesthesiology 2003; 99:174–87
6.Stein C, Schäfer M, Machelska H: Attacking pain at its source: New perspectives on opioids. Nat Med 2003; 9:1003–8
7.Coggeshall RE, Zhou S, Carlton SM: Opioid receptors on peripheral sensory axons. Brain Res 1997; 764:126–32
8.Zhang JQ, Nagata K, Iijima T: Scanning electron microscopy and immunohistochemical observations of the vascular nerve plexuses in the dental pulp of rat incisor. Anat Rec 1998; 251:214–20
9.Ji RR, Zhang Q, Law PY, Low HH, Elde R, Hökfelt T: Expression of mu-, delta-, and kappa-opioid receptor-like immunoreactivities in rat dorsal root ganglia after carrageenan-induced inflammation. J Neurosci 1995; 15:8156–66
10.Schäfer M, Imai Y, Uhl GR, Stein C: Inflammation enhances peripheral mu-opioid receptor-mediated analgesia, but not mu-opioid receptor transcription in dorsal root ganglia. Eur J Pharmacol 1995; 279:165–9
11.Puehler W, Zöllner C, Brack A, Shaqura MA, Krause H, Schäfer M, Stein C: Rapid upregulation of mu opioid receptor mRNA in dorsal root ganglia in response to peripheral inflammation depends on neuronal conduction. Neuroscience 2004; 129:473–9
12.Puehler W, Rittner HL, Mousa SA, Brack A, Krause H, Stein C, Schäfer M: Interleukin-1 beta contributes to the upregulation of kappa opioid receptor mrna in dorsal root ganglia in response to peripheral inflammation. Neuroscience 2006; 141:989–98
13.Mousa SA, Cheppudira BP, Shaqura M, Fischer O, Hofmann J, Hellweg R, Schäfer M: Nerve growth factor governs the enhanced ability of opioids to suppress inflammatory pain. Brain 2007; 130:502–13
14.Hassan AH, Ableitner A, Stein C, Herz A: Inflammation of the rat paw enhances axonal transport of opioid receptors in the sciatic nerve and increases their density in the inflamed tissue. Neuroscience 1993; 55:185–95
15.Igwe OJ: c-Src kinase activation regulates preprotachykinin gene expression and substance P secretion in rat sensory ganglia. Eur J Neurosci 2003; 18:1719–30
16.Donnerer J, Schuligoi R, Stein C, Amann R: Upregulation, release and axonal transport of substance P and calcitonin gene-related peptide in adjuvant inflammation and regulatory function of nerve growth factor. Regul Pept 1993; 46:150–4
17.Lindsay RM, Lockett C, Sternberg J, Winter J: Neuropeptide expression in cultures of adult sensory neurons: Modulation of substance P and calcitonin gene-related peptide levels by nerve growth factor. Neuroscience 1989; 33:53–65
18.Lindsay RM, Harmar AJ: Nerve growth factor regulates expression of neuropeptide genes in adult sensory neurons. Nature 1989; 337:362–4
19.Ji RR, Samad TA, Jin SX, Schmoll R, Woolf CJ: p38 MAPK activation by NGF in primary sensory neurons after inflammation increases TRPV1 levels and maintains heat hyperalgesia. Neuron 2002; 36:57–68
20.Ramer MS, Bradbury EJ, McMahon SB: Nerve growth factor induces P2X(3) expression in sensory neurons. J Neurochem 2001; 77:864–75
21.Mamet J, Baron A, Lazdunski M, Voilley N: Proinflammatory mediators, stimulators of sensory neuron excitability via the expression of acid-sensing ion channels. J Neurosci 2002; 22:10662–70
22.Woolf CJ, Mannion RJ, Neumann S: Null mutations lacking substance: Elucidating pain mechanisms by genetic pharmacology. Neuron 1998; 20:1063–6
23.Ji RR, Baba H, Brenner GJ, Woolf CJ: Nociceptive-specific activation of ERK in spinal neurons contributes to pain hypersensitivity. Nat Neurosci 1999; 2:1114–9
24.Widmann C, Gibson S, Jarpe MB, Johnson GL: Mitogen-activated protein kinase: Conservation of a three-kinase module from yeast to human. Physiol Rev 1999; 79:143–80
25.Ji RR: Mitogen-activated protein kinases as potential targets for pain killers. Curr Opin Investig Drugs 2004; 5:71–5
26.Zhuang ZY, Xu H, Clapham DE, Ji RR: Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase activates ERK in primary sensory neurons and mediates inflammatory heat hyperalgesia through TRPV1 sensitization. J Neurosci 2004; 24:8300–9
27.Bron R, Klesse LJ, Shah K, Parada LF, Winter J: Activation of Ras is necessary and sufficient for upregulation of vanilloid receptor type 1 in sensory neurons by neurotrophic factors. Mol Cell Neurosci 2003; 22:118–32
28.Svensson CI, Hua XY, Protter AA, Powell HC, Yaksh TL: Spinal p38 MAP kinase is necessary for NMDA-induced spinal PGE(2) release and thermal hyperalgesia. Neuroreport 2003; 14:1153–7
29.Mousa SA, Bopaiah CP, Richter JF, Yamdeu RS, Schäfer M: Inhibition of inflammatory pain by CRF at peripheral, spinal and supraspinal sites: Involvement of areas coexpressing CRF receptors and opioid peptides. Neuropsychopharmacology 2007; 32:2530–42
30.Amann R, Schuligoi R, Herzeg G, Donnerer J: Intraplantar injection of nerve growth factor into the rat hind paw: Local edema and effects on thermal nociceptive threshold. Pain 1996; 64:323–9
31.Ji RR, Befort K, Brenner GJ, Woolf CJ: ERK MAP kinase activation in superficial spinal cord neurons induces prodynorphin and NK-1 upregulation and contributes to persistent inflammatory pain hypersensitivity. J Neurosci 2002; 22:478–85
32.Schmitt TK, Mousa SA, Brack A, Schmidt DK, Rittner HL, Welte M, Schäfer M, Stein C: Modulation of peripheral endogenous opioid analgesia by central afferent blockade. Anesthesiology 2003; 98:195–202
33.Ji RR, Rupp F: Phosphorylation of transcription factor CREB in rat spinal cord after formalin-induced hyperalgesia: Relationship to c-fos induction. J Neurosci 1997; 17:1776–85
34.Mu TW, Ong DS, Wang YJ, Balch WE, Yates JR 3rd, Segatori L, Kelly JW: Chemical and biological approaches synergize to ameliorate protein-folding diseases. Cell 2008; 134:769–81
35.Zollner C, Shaqura MA, Bopaiah CP, Mousa S, Stein C, Schafer M: Painful inflammation-induced increase in mu-opioid receptor binding and G-protein coupling in primary afferent neurons. Mol Pharmacol 2003; 64:202–10
36.Walsh GS, Krol KM, Kawaja MD: Absence of the p75 neurotrophin receptor alters the pattern of sympathosensory sprouting in the trigeminal ganglia of mice overexpressing nerve growth factor. J Neurosci 1999; 19:258–73
37.Frank AJ, Tilby MJ: Quantification of DNA adducts in individual cells by immunofluorescence: Effects of variation in DNA conformation. Exp Cell Res 2003; 283:127–34
38.Safieh-Garabedian B, Poole S, Allchorne A, Winter J, Woolf CJ: Contribution of interleukin-1 beta to the inflammation-induced increase in nerve growth factor levels and inflammatory hyperalgesia. Br J Pharmacol 1995; 115:1265–75
39.Yassen A, Olofsen E, Dahan A, Danhof M: Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of the antinociceptive effect of buprenorphine and fentanyl in rats: Role of receptor equilibration kinetics. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2005; 313:1136–49
40.Kenakin T: Stimulus-response mechanisms, Pharmacological Analysis of Drug-Receptor Interaction. Philadelphia, Lippincott–Raven, 1997, pp 78–105
41.Shaqura MA, Zöllner C, Mousa SA, Stein C, Schäfer M: Characterization of mu opioid receptor binding and G protein coupling in rat hypothalamus, spinal cord, and primary afferent neurons during inflammatory pain. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2004; 308:712–8
42.Molliver DC, Lindsay J, Albers KM, Davis BM: Overexpression of NGF or GDNF alters transcriptional plasticity evoked by inflammation. Pain 2005; 113:277–84
43.Zwick M, Molliver DC, Lindsay J, Fairbanks CA, Sengoku T, Albers KM, Davis BM: Transgenic mice possessing increased numbers of nociceptors do not exhibit increased behavioral sensitivity in models of inflammatory and neuropathic pain. Pain 2003; 106:491–500
44.Cahill CM, Dray A, Coderre TJ: Intrathecal nerve growth factor restores opioid effectiveness in an animal model of neuropathic pain. Neuropharmacology 2003; 45:543–52
45.Delcroix JD, Valletta JS, Wu C, Hunt SJ, Kowal AS, Mobley WC: NGF signaling in sensory neurons: Evidence that early endosomes carry NGF retrograde signals. Neuron 2003; 39:69–84
46.Ji RR, Gereau RW 4th, Malcangio M, Strichartz GR: MAP kinase and pain. Brain Res Rev 2009; 60:135–48
47.Obata K, Yamanaka H, Dai Y, Mizushima T, Fukuoka T, Tokunaga A, Noguchi K: Activation of extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase in the dorsal root ganglion following inflammation near the nerve cell body. Neuroscience 2004; 126:1011–21
48.Börner C, Kraus J, Schröder H, Ammer H, Höllt V: Transcriptional regulation of the human mu-opioid receptor gene by interleukin-6. Mol Pharmacol 2004; 66:1719–26
49.Zhong H, Murphy TJ, Minneman KP: Activation of signal transducers and activators of transcription by alpha(1A)-adrenergic receptor stimulation in PC12 cells. Mol Pharmacol 2000; 57:961–7
50.Xing J, Kornhauser JM, Xia Z, Thiele EA, Greenberg ME: Nerve growth factor activates extracellular signal-regulated kinase and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways to stimulate CREB serine 133 phosphorylation. Mol Cell Biol 1998; 18:1946–55
51.Tamura S, Morikawa Y, Senba E: Up-regulated phosphorylation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 and cyclic AMP-responsive element binding protein by peripheral inflammation in primary afferent neurons possibly through oncostatin M receptor. Neuroscience 2005; 133:797–806
52.Rajasingh J, Bord E, Luedemann C, Asai J, Hamada H, Thorne T, Qin G, Goukassian D, Zhu Y, Losordo DW, Kishore R: IL-10-induced TNF-alpha mRNA destabilization is mediated via IL-10 suppression of p38 MAP kinase activation and inhibition of HuR expression. FASEB J 2006; 20:2112–4
53.Winzen R, Gowrishankar G, Bollig F, Redich N, Resch K, Holtmann H: Distinct domains of AU-rich elements exert different functions in mRNA destabilization and stabilization by p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase or HuR. Mol Cell Biol 2004; 24:4835–47
54.Sully G, Dean JL, Wait R, Rawlinson L, Santalucia T, Saklatvala J, Clark AR: Structural and functional dissection of a conserved destabilizing element of cyclo-oxygenase-2 mRNA: Evidence against the involvement of AUF-1 [AU-rich element/poly(U)-binding/degradation factor-1], AUF-2, tristetraprolin, HuR (Hu antigen R) or FBP1 (far-upstream-sequence-element-binding protein 1). Biochem J 2004; 377:629–39
55.Subbaramaiah K, Dannenberg AJ: Cyclooxygenase 2: A molecular target for cancer prevention and treatment. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2003; 24:96–102
56.Ide T, Matsuda H, Nishida K, Maeda N, Watanabe H, Inoue Y: Rheumatoid arthritis-associated corneal ulceration complicated by bacterial infection. Mod Rheumatol 2005; 15:454–8
57.Kasai S, Hayashida M, Sora I, Ikeda K: Candidate gene polymorphisms predicting individual sensitivity to opioids. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 2008; 377:269–81
58.Zöllner C, Johnson PS, Bei Wang J, Roy AJ Jr, Layton KM, Min Wu J, Surratt CK: Control of mu opioid receptor expression by modification of cDNA 5′- and 3′-noncoding regions. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 2000; 79:159–62
59.Ninkovic M, Hunt SP, Gleave JR: Localization of opiate and histamine H1-receptors in the primate sensory ganglia and spinal cord. Brain Res 1982; 241:197–206
60.Jeanjean AP, Maloteaux JM, Laduron PM: IL-1 beta-like Freund's adjuvant enhances axonal transport of opiate receptors in sensory neurons. Neurosci Lett 1994; 177:75–8
∥ National Research Council Institute for Laboratory Animal Research. The Development of Science-based Guidelines for Laboratory Animal Care: Proceedings of the November 2003 International Workshop. Washington, National Academies Press, 2004. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bookshelf/br.fcgi?book=nap11138
. Accessed October 29, 2010. Cited Here...
# National Institutes of Health. ImageJ: Image Processing and Analysis in Java. Available at: http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/
. Accessed June 28, 2010. Cited Here...
This article has been cited 4 time(s).
PeptidesEndogenous opiates and behavior: 2011Peptides
Journal of PainReduced Number, G Protein Coupling, and Antinociceptive Efficacy of Spinal Mu-Opioid Receptors in Diabetic Rats Are Reversed by Nerve Growth FactorJournal of Pain
Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta-Molecular Cell ResearchInhibition of c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase stimulates mu opioid receptor expression via p38 MAPK-mediated nuclear NF-kappa B activation in neuronal and non-neuronal cellsBiochimica Et Biophysica Acta-Molecular Cell Research
DiabetesRab7 Silencing Prevents mu-Opioid Receptor Lysosomal Targeting and Rescues Opioid Responsiveness to Strengthen Diabetic Neuropathic Pain TherapyDiabetes
© 2011 American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc.
Publication of an advertisement in Anesthesiology Online does not constitute endorsement by the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc. or Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. of the product or service being advertised.