We thank Dr. Mulroy for his comments on voiding requirement in outpatients receiving neuraxial blockade with short-acting local anesthetic. We would like to take the opportunity to clarify some issues raised by Dr. Mulroy.
In our review,1
we identified several risk factors for postoperative urinary retention (POUR), such as type and duration of surgery, patient comorbidities, intraoperative fluid management, and choice of anesthetic and analgesic technique.
In the setting of ambulatory surgery, we proposed an algorithm based in part on two previous studies by Pavlin et al.2,3
In the first study, patients were stratified before surgery in high and low risk for POUR. Patients who had a past history of urinary retention and those who underwent anorectal and inguinal hernia repair surgery were considered at high risk, even if they did not receive either spinal or epidural anesthesia. In the second study,3
27% of the patients who received neuraxial anesthesia with local anesthetic (bupivacaine or lidocaine ± epinephrine) were unable to void and had a bladder volume greater than 600 ml, thus requiring in-and-out bladder catheterization. These patients were identified by Pavlin et al.
as high risk only because they received neuraxial anesthesia. However, in our opinion, the high incidence of POUR in this group was not caused by the use of spinal–epidural anesthesia per se
, but by the use of long-acting local anesthetics. Mulroy et al.
in contrast, studied 46 patients without risk factors for POUR who received spinal or epidural anesthesia with short-acting local anesthetic with or without intrathecal fentanyl and who were discharged without voiding. None of them returned to the hospital because of POUR.
The aim of our review was to bring to the attention of anesthesiologists the perioperative risk factors for POUR, and propose an algorithm on how to manage urinary retention judiciously. We agree with Dr. Mulroy that in outpatients with no risk factors for POUR, neuraxial anesthesia with short-acting local anesthetic does not increase the risk of POUR, and patients can be discharged home without voiding. However, in patients with preoperative risk factors for POUR, neuraxial anesthesia with short-acting local anesthetic may or may not further increase the risk, but the availability of a perioperative algorithm that includes the use of a bladder scan could facilitate the management of this potential complication.
Gabriele Baldini, M.D.
Hema Bagry, M.D., F.R.C.A.
Armen Aprikian, M.D.
Franco Carli, M.D., M.Phil., F.R.C.A., F.R.C.P.C.*
*McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada. email@example.com
1. Baldini G, Bagry H, Aprikian A, Carli F: Postoperative urinary retention: Anesthetic and perioperative considerations. Anesthesiology 2009; 110:1139–57
2. Pavlin DJ, Pavlin EG, Fitzgibbon DR, Koerschgen ME, Plitt TM: Management of bladder function after outpatient surgery. Anesthesiology 1999; 91:42–50
3. Pavlin DJ, Pavlin EG, Gunn HC, Taraday JK, Koerschgen ME: Voiding in patients managed with or without ultrasound monitoring of bladder volume after outpatient surgery. Anesth Analg 1999; 89:90–7
4. Mulroy MF, Salinas FV, Larkin KL, Polissar NL: Ambulatory surgery patients may be discharged before voiding after short-acting spinal and epidural anesthesia. Anesthesiology 2002; 97:315–9
© 2009 American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc.