Skip Navigation LinksHome > December 2009 - Volume 111 - Issue 6 > Opioid-induced Decreases in Rat Brain Adenosine Levels Are R...
Anesthesiology:
doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181bdf894
Pain Medicine

Opioid-induced Decreases in Rat Brain Adenosine Levels Are Reversed by Inhibiting Adenosine Deaminase

Nelson, Ariana M. B.A.*; Battersby, Alanna S. B.S.*; Baghdoyan, Helen A. Ph.D.†; Lydic, Ralph Ph.D.†

Free Access
Article Outline
Collapse Box

Author Information

Collapse Box

Abstract

Background: Opioids disrupt sleep and adenosine promotes sleep, but no studies have characterized the effects of opioids on adenosine levels in brain regions known to regulate states of arousal. Delivering opioids to the pontine reticular formation (PRF) and substantia innominata (SI) region of the basal forebrain disrupts sleep. In contrast, administering adenosine agonists to the PRF or SI increases sleep. These findings encouraged the current study testing the hypothesis that microdialysis delivery of opioids to the PRF or SI decreases adenosine levels in the PRF or SI, respectively.
Methods: A microdialysis probe was placed in the PRF of isoflurane anesthetized rats and perfused with Ringer's solution (control) followed by Ringer's solution containing morphine (0, 10, 30, 100, or 300 μm), fentanyl (100 μm), morphine (100 μm) and the adenosine deaminase inhibitor EHNA (100 μm), or naloxone (10 μm) and morphine (100 μm). Additional experiments measured adenosine levels in the SI before and during microdialysis delivery of morphine, fentanyl, and morphine plus EHNA.
Results: Morphine caused a significant (P < 0.05) concentration-dependent decrease in PRF adenosine levels. The significant decrease (−20%) in adenosine caused by 100 μm morphine was blocked by coadministration of naloxone. Fentanyl also significantly decreased (−13.3%) PRF adenosine. SI adenosine levels were decreased by morphine (−26.8%) and fentanyl (−27.4%). In both PRF and SI, coadministration of morphine and EHNA prevented the significant decrease in adenosine levels caused by morphine alone.
Conclusions: These data support the interpretation that decreased adenosine levels in sleep-regulating brain regions may be one of the mechanisms by which opioids disrupt sleep.
OPIOIDS and the purine nucleoside adenosine modulate pain and states of sleep and wakefulness. Opioids provide excellent pain management but cause the unwanted side effect of sleep disruption.1 Interrupted sleep heightens the perception of pain,2,3 which increases opioid requirement.4 Adenosine increases sleep,5–8 and adenosine can contribute to pain management9 in a manner that can be opioid sparing.10
Mice lacking the μ-opioid receptor gene show loss of analgesic response to morphine as well as decreased pain sensitivity.11 These μ-opioid receptor knockout mice also have reduced binding at adenosine A1 receptors,12 suggesting a functional interaction between opioid and adenosine receptors. Whether opioids alter adenosine levels in brain regions that regulate sleep and nociception has not previously been investigated.
The pontine reticular formation (PRF) and the substantia innominata (SI) region of the basal forebrain contribute to the regulation of sleep and anesthesia.13,14 Sleep is disrupted by delivery of opioids to the PRF15,16 or to the SI.17 In contrast, sleep is increased by adenosine agonists delivered to the PRF18–20 and by increasing adenosine levels in the SI.5,21 Therefore, the current study was designed to test the hypothesis that microdialysis delivery of opioids to the PRF or the SI decreases PRF or SI adenosine levels, respectively.
Back to Top | Article Outline

Materials and Methods

Animals
All studies were performed using adult male Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 42; mean body weight 300 g) purchased from Charles River Laboratories (Wilmington, MA) and housed in a 12-h light–12-h dark cycle. In International Genetic Standard (IGS®) nomenclature, these animals are Crl:CD(SD) rats. Procedures were conducted in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1996) and all studies adhered to the guidelines established by the University of Michigan Committee on the Use and Care of Animals (Ann Arbor, Michigan).
Back to Top | Article Outline
Adenosine Measurement Using Microdialysis and High-performance Liquid Chromatography with Ultraviolet Detection
Microdialysis probes (cuprophane membrane: 1 mm long, 0.24 mm in diameter, 6-kDa cutoff; CMA Microdialysis, North Chelmsford, MA) were connected to a CMA/100 pump set at a constant flow rate of 2.0 μl/min. Before the in vivo portion of each experiment, in vitro microdialysis of a known concentration of adenosine was used to determine the amount of adenosine recovered by each dialysis probe. Pre-experiment probe recovery values and post-experiment probe recoveries were compared by t test to ensure that changes in adenosine levels measured during in vivo experiments were not an artifact due to changes in dialysis probe recovery. Endogenous adenosine in each dialysis sample was expressed in nm. Each 30-μl dialysis sample was injected into a high-performance liquid chromatography system (Bioanalytical Systems, West Lafayette, IN) coupled to an ultraviolet detector (wavelength 254 nm) to measure adenosine. Chromatograms were digitized and analyzed using ChromGraph software (Bioanalytical Systems). Adenosine chromatograms obtained from dialysis samples were compared to a five-point standard curve produced with known concentrations of adenosine ranging from 10 to 200 nm. A standard curve was obtained before each experiment.
Back to Top | Article Outline
Drug Preparation
Drugs were dissolved in Ringer's solution (pH 5.8–6.2) composed of 146 mm NaCl, 4.0 mm KCl, 2.4 mm CaCl2, and 10 μm of the adenosine deaminase inhibitor erythro-9-(2-hydroxy-3-nonyl)adenine (EHNA; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). Morphine sulfate (Hawkins Chemical, Minneapolis, MN) was prepared in concentrations of 10, 30, 100, and 300 μm. To antagonize the effects of morphine, adenosine levels were measured during dialysis with a mixture of 10 μm naloxone HCl (Tocris, Ellisville, MO) and 100 μm morphine. Fentanyl citrate (Cat. No. F3886; Sigma) was administered to the dialysis probe in a concentration of 100 μm. A final set of experiments was designed to determine whether inhibiting adenosine deaminase reverses the morphine induced decrease in adenosine levels. For these experiments, 110 μm EHNA was coadministered with 100 μm morphine. All drug concentrations listed above refer to solutions used to perfuse the microdialysis probes and do not indicate drug concentrations delivered to the brain. Based on calculations of in vitro adenosine recovery, approximately 4.5% of the dialyzed drug was delivered to the brain.
Back to Top | Article Outline
Experimental Design and Procedures
A within-subjects experimental design was used to quantify the effects of opioids on adenosine levels by comparing adenosine measures obtained during 60 min of dialysis with Ringer's solution (control) to adenosine measures obtained during 60 min of dialysis with Ringer's solution containing morphine, fentanyl, morphine plus naloxone, or morphine plus EHNA.
Experiments began by placing a rat in a Plexiglas chamber for induction of anesthesia with 4% isoflurane in 100% O2. After 5 min, the anesthetized rat was removed from the chamber and placed in a stereotaxic frame (David Kopf Instruments, Tujunga, CA). A rat anesthesia mask was used to deliver 2.5% isoflurane in 100% O2. A midline scalp incision exposed lambda and bregma landmarks, and the skull was marked above either the PRF (stereotaxic coordinates: 8.4 mm posterior to bregma, 1.0 mm lateral to the midline, 9.2 mm below bregma) or the SI (stereotaxic coordinates: 1.6 mm posterior to bregma, 2.5 mm lateral to the midline, 8.7 mm below bregma).22 The oral and caudal portions of the pontine reticular nucleus comprise the PRF.22 A small craniotomy was made in the skull using a Dremel tool (Racine, WI), and the microdialysis probe was lowered into the brain. Delivered isoflurane was measured continuously (Cardiocap/5; Datex-Ohmeda, Louisville, CO) and maintained at 1.5% throughout the experiment. Body temperature was maintained at 37°C using a water blanket and a recirculating heat pump (Gaymar Industries, Orchard Park, NY) for the duration of the experiment and during recovery from anesthesia.
Dialysis samples were collected every 15 min. Four samples were collected during dialysis with Ringer's solution to quantify control levels of adenosine. A liquid switch was then activated to dialyze with Ringer's solution containing morphine, fentanyl, morphine and naloxone, or morphine and EHNA. After collection of four dialysis samples during drug delivery, the microdialysis probe was withdrawn from the brain and the scalp incision was closed. Isoflurane delivery was stopped, and the animal was removed from the stereotaxic frame. Rats were monitored until ambulatory and returned to their home cages.
Back to Top | Article Outline
Histologic Localization of Microdialysis Sites
Two to 4 days after the dialysis experiment, each rat was deeply anesthetized and decapitated. The brain was removed, and 40-μm-thick coronal sections were cut serially using a cryostat (Leica Microsystems, Nussloch, Germany). Sections were mounted on chrome alum–coated slides, fixed in paraformaldehyde vapor (80°C), and stained with cresyl violet. The histologic sections were then digitized using a Nikon Super Coolscan 4000 scanner (Tokyo, Japan). Verification that the probe was located in the PRF or SI was achieved by comparison of the digitized histology sections to plates in a rat brain atlas.22
Back to Top | Article Outline
Statistical Analysis
Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Image Tools
Adenosine levels measured during microdialysis delivery of opioids were compared with adenosine levels measured during microdialysis with Ringer's solution (control). Each set of data was tested for goodness of fit to a normal distribution. SAS software (release 9.1.3; SAS Institute, Cary NC) was used to determine drug effects on adenosine levels. A linear mixed model analysis of variance was used for each of the outcome variables with drug as a fixed effect and rat as a random effect (a random intercept was used for each rat). This analysis resulted in a compound symmetric covariance structure that made it possible to take into account the correlations among observations from the same animal. This statistical approach is described in detail elsewhere.23 In addition to analysis of variance and post hoc test, regression analyses showed that the slope of the declining adenosine levels during dialysis with Ringer's solution (control) (fig. 1) was not significantly different from zero slope and that the slope of the adenosine functions during minutes 121–180 was not different from the slope during minutes 181–240. Post hoc comparisons of drug effects were conducted using the Dunnett multiple comparisons method and t test to compare each drug condition to control. P values less than 0.05 were considered significant. Data are reported as mean (±SD).
Back to Top | Article Outline

Results

Stability of Adenosine Measurement
After brain insertion of a microdialysis probe, levels of adenosine are initially high and decline over time before stabilizing.6 Therefore, to test the hypothesis that opioids decrease brain adenosine levels, the first step was to demonstrate stability of adenosine levels during the time course of the current experiment. Figure 1A illustrates the time course of adenosine levels measured every 15 min in the PRF during dialysis with Ringer's solution (control). Each bar summarizes the mean adenosine concentration for three rats at a given time point after the microdialysis probe was inserted into the brain. As shown previously for the neurotransmitter γ-aminobutyric acid, the stability of adenosine levels was confirmed by slope analysis.14 After microdialysis probe insertion into the brain, the first 7 samples (minutes 15–105) showed a consistent decrease in adenosine. For minutes 120–240, however, regression analyses revealed that the slope of adenosine levels was not significantly different from zero. These data confirmed the appropriateness of the current experimental design in which microdialysis samples obtained during minutes 121–180 were used to quantify control levels of adenosine and samples collected during minutes 181–240 were used to quantify opioid effects on adenosine levels. Figure 1B shows that during microdialysis with Ringer's solution, the average adenosine level during minutes 121–180 was not significantly different by t test from the average adenosine level during minutes 181–240. These results confirmed that time was not a confounding variable and that opioids caused the decreased adenosine levels in PRF and SI.
Back to Top | Article Outline
Morphine Delivery to the PRF Caused a Concentration-dependent Decrease in PRF Adenosine Levels That Was Blocked by Naloxone
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Image Tools
Figure 2A shows that dialysis delivery of morphine to 14 rats caused a concentration-dependent decrease in PRF adenosine (P < 0.0001). The linear mixed model with Dunnett post hoc analysis indicated that each concentration of morphine caused a significant decrease in PRF adenosine. The mean percent decrease (±SD) in adenosine levels caused by 10, 30, 100, and 300 μm morphine was 11.53 (±19.99), 15.31 (±16.19), 20.2 (±9.47), and 16.91 (±11.28), respectively. Data from five rats (fig. 2B) analyzed using the linear mixed model showed that the decrease in adenosine caused by morphine (100 μm) was blocked by coadministration of naloxone (10 μm). Figure 2C summarizes data from three rats showing that fentanyl (100 μm) significantly (P = 0.0003) decreased PRF adenosine levels by 13.3% (±9.1%). All dialysis sites were histologically confirmed to be within the PRF (fig. 2D). The mean PRF dialysis site was 8.3 (±0.3) mm posterior to bregma, 1.2 (±0.2) mm lateral to the midline, and 9.1 (±0.1) mm below the surface of the skull.
Back to Top | Article Outline
Adenosine Levels in SI of Basal Forebrain Were Decreased by Opioids
Previous studies using intact, unanesthetized cats report comparable basal levels of adenosine in SI and pontine brain stem, but different rates of change during 6 h of sleep deprivation.6 Therefore, we also quantitatively evaluated the stability of adenosine levels in SI of isoflurane-anesthetized rats during microdialysis with Ringer's solution alone. Three rats were used to quantify SI adenosine levels every 15 min for 240 min after brain insertion of the microdialysis probe. Mean (±SD) SI adenosine levels were 24.3 (±5.8) nm during minutes 121–180 and 20.9 (±4.4) nm during minutes 181–240. There was no significant difference in SI adenosine levels as a function of time as confirmed by repeated-measures analysis of variance, t tests, and regression analyses. Power calculations using the mean and SD values above indicate that 33 rats would be required to demonstrate a significant difference in SI adenosine as a function of time alone.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Image Tools
Figure 3A summarizes data from five rats showing that dialysis of the SI with morphine (100 μm) significantly (P < 0.0009) decreased SI adenosine levels. The linear mixed model showed the mean percent decrease (±SD) was 26.8 ± (10.5). In a second series of studies, fentanyl (100 μm) was delivered by dialysis to the SI of three additional rats. The results (fig. 3B) revealed that fentanyl significantly (P = 0.0004) decreased adenosine levels by 27.4% (±20.11%). Mean (±SD) stereotaxic coordinates for microdialysis probe placement in the SI (fig. 3C) was 1.6 (±0.04) mm posterior to bregma, 2.6 (±0.1) mm lateral to the midline, and 8.5 (±0.2) mm below the surface of the skull. The morphine and fentanyl results, considered together with the control experiments, support the interpretation that opioids delivered to the SI cause a significant decrease in SI adenosine levels.
Back to Top | Article Outline
Coadministration of an Adenosine Deaminase Inhibitor with Morphine Reversed the Decrease in Adenosine Levels Caused by Morphine Alone
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Image Tools
Figure 4A shows that coadministering EHNA with morphine to the PRF caused a 26.35% (±15.11%) increase in adenosine (P = 0.0005), relative to dialysis with Ringer's solution. Similarly, figure 4B summarizes results from three additional rats showing that coadministration of morphine and EHNA to the SI caused a 17.8% (±24.9%) increase in SI adenosine (P = 0.02).
Back to Top | Article Outline

Discussion

The results add novel data to a growing body of evidence14,17,24–34 supporting the hypothesis that anatomically distributed neural networks regulating states of sleep and wakefulness are also involved in generating states of anesthesia.13,35 Agreement between preclinical and clinical studies illustrates the relevance of this line of investigation for anesthesiology. For example, increasing brain acetylcholine reverses isoflurane anesthesia in rats36 and reverses propofol-induced unconsciousness in humans.37 The endogenous neuropeptide hypocretin (orexin) promotes wakefulness in humans38 and shortens recovery time from isoflurane anesthesia in mice.33 The current focus on adenosine and opioids stems from long-standing evidence that adenosine modulates acute and chronic effects of opioids39 and from the potential for adenosine to contribute to pain management.9,10 The results are discussed in relation to pontine and basal forebrain regions through which opioids and adenosine significantly alter levels of behavioral arousal, nociception, and cognition.
Back to Top | Article Outline
Pontine Reticular Formation Adenosine Promotes Sleep, whereas Opioids Inhibit Sleep and Decrease Adenosine Levels
Converging lines of evidence encouraged the current study to begin by characterizing how opioids delivered to the PRF alter levels of adenosine (fig. 2). The hypothesis that adenosine promotes sleep40,41 is now widely accepted42 and is consistent with the fact that adenosine antagonists such as theophylline and caffeine enhance wakefulness. Previous studies show that microdialysis delivery of an adenosine A1 receptor agonist to cat PRF significantly delays recovery time from halothane anesthesia.43 Likewise, microdialysis delivery of an adenosine A2A receptor agonist to the PRF of intact, unanesthetized mice increases sleep.19 There are four subtypes (A1, A2A, A2B, and A3) of G protein–coupled adenosine receptors,44 and adenosine A1 and A2A receptors are present in the PRF.19,45 The findings that morphine caused a concentration-dependent decrease in adenosine levels (fig. 2A), that this decrease was blocked by naloxone (fig. 2B), and that fentanyl also decreased adenosine (fig. 2C) all indicate opioid receptor modulation of adenosine in the PRF (fig. 2D). The reticular formation is also part of an ascending pathway that transduces nociceptive input into traits of behavioral and autonomic arousal comprising the psychophysiological experience of pain.46 In this context, it is relevant that administering adenosine agonists into the PRF, in doses that do not eliminate wakefulness, also significantly decreases nociception.47,48
Back to Top | Article Outline
Basal Forebrain Adenosine Decreases Wakefulness and Opioids Diminish Sleep, Cognitive Function, and Adenosine Levels
Previous studies have shown that delivery of exogenous adenosine to the basal forebrain decreases wakefulness.49 The concept that adenosine contributes to the homeostatic regulation of wakefulness and sleep is supported by the finding that endogenous adenosine levels in basal forebrain increase during prolonged intervals of wakefulness.5 Adenosine inhibits wake-active neurons in the basal forebrain of rats50 and cats,51 consistent with the suggestion that behavioral state altering effects of adenosine result, in part, from inhibition of cholinergic input to cortex.5
Adenosine and acetylcholine interact to modulate arousal states, as clearly indicated by the finding that systemic administration of the adenosine receptor antagonist caffeine increases cortical acetylcholine.52 Opioids cause brain region–specific changes in acetylcholine release1,53 and have been shown to decrease acetylcholine release in the basal forebrain.17 The figure 3 data indicate for the first time that opioids in the basal forebrain decrease adenosine levels. Cortical acetylcholine is essential for normal cognition and morphine decreases cortical acetylcholine release when delivered systemically or locally to the basal forebrain.17 Postoperative cognitive dysfunction is a clinically significant problem for anesthesiology,54 and patients with cognitive dysfunction at time of hospital discharge are those with greater opioid use.55 The discovery that cortical cholinergic neurotransmission is decreased by opioids delivered to the basal forebrain suggested the potential for opioids to contribute to cognitive dysfunction.17 The figure 3 data show further that opioids also decrease adenosine levels in the SI region of the basal forebrain. In addition to replicating findings in the PRF (fig. 2), the figure 3 data identify the SI as another brain region, and adenosine as another molecule, through which opioids have the potential to disrupt sleep and cognition.
Back to Top | Article Outline
Potential Clinical Relevance: Adenosine as an Adjunctive Agent for Managing Pain while Minimizing Sleep Disruption
Similar to the paradoxical pain-enhancing effects of opioids,56 sleep disruption by opioids adds to the conundrum of clinically managing pain with opioids.57–59 Poor sleep is a major complaint of patients experiencing pain,60,61 and sleep disruption, even in the absence of opioids, causes cognitive dysfunction.62 Clinically relevant doses of opioids increase lighter stage 2 nonrapid eye movement sleep, decrease deeper stage 3 and 4 nonrapid eye movement sleep, and decrease rapid eye movement sleep.1,63–66 Opioids slow the cortical electroencephalogram and create an obtunded state of wakefulness characterized by lethargy and cognitive slowing.17,67,68 Sleep and electroencephalographic data recorded from rats16 fit well with clinical evidence showing that opioids increase electroencephalogram power in the delta (0.35–3.5 Hz) and theta (3.5–8 Hz) frequency ranges.69,70 Opioids disrupt sleep even in pain-free human volunteers.71 Sleep disruption reduces emotional well-being,72 causes hyperalgesia,73 and exacerbates pain.74
For more than 10 yr, adenosine has been investigated as a potential adjunctive tool for pain management.9,75–78 Therefore, a final set of neurochemical experiments was designed to determine whether the opioid-induced decrease in adenosine (figs. 2 and 3) could be reversed during opioid administration. The results show that within both the PRF (fig. 4A) and the SI region of the basal forebrain (fig. 4B), decreasing the enzymatic degradation of adenosine by coadministering morphine plus an adenosine deaminase inhibitor prevented any opioid induced decreases in adenosine. The finding that sleep can be increased by microdialysis delivery of an adenosine deaminase inhibitor,79 combined with the figure 4 results, encourages continuing efforts to develop adjunctive therapies to counter opioid-induced disruptions of sleep and wakefulness.
For expert assistance, the authors thank Diane Ignasiak, B.S. (Research Associate), Brian Jespersen, B.S. (Research Associate), Sha Jiang, B.S. (Research Associate), Mary A. Norat, B.S. (Senior Research Associate), and Sarah L. Watson, B.S. (Senior Research Associate), from the Department of Anesthesiology, and Kathy Welch, M.A., M.P.H. (Statistician Staff Specialist), from the Center for Statistical Consultation and Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Back to Top | Article Outline

References

1. Lydic R, Baghdoyan HA: Neurochemical mechanisms mediating opioid-induced REM sleep disruption, Sleep and Pain. Edited by Lavigne G, Sessle BJ, Choinière M, Soja PJ. Seattle, International Association for the Study of Pain Press, 2007, pp 99–122

2. Roehrs T, Roth T: Sleep and pain: Interaction of two vital functions. Semin Neurol 2005; 25:106–16

3. Kundermann B, Krieg JC, Schreiber W, Lautenbacher S: The effect of sleep deprivation on pain. Pain Res Manag 2004; 9:25–32

4. Gallagher RM, Rosenthal LJ: Chronic pain and opiates: Balancing pain control and risks in long-term opioid treatment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008; 89:S77–82

5. Porkka-Heiskanen T, Strecker RE, Thakkar M, Bjorkum AA, Greene RW, McCarley RW: Adenosine: A mediator of the sleep-inducing effects of prolonged wakefulness. Science 1997; 276:1265–8

6. Porkka-Heiskanen T, Strecker RE, McCarley RW: Brain site-specificity of extracellular adenosine concentration changes during sleep deprivation and spontaneous sleep: An in vivo microdialysis study. Neuroscience 2000; 99:507–17

7. Basheer R, Strecker RE, Thakkar MM, McCarley RW: Adenosine and sleep-wake regulation. Prog Neurobiol 2004; 73:379–96

8. Porkka-Heiskanen T, Alanko L, Kalinchuk A, Stenberg D: Adenosine and sleep. Sleep Med Rev 2002; 6:321–32

9. Gan TJ, Habib AS: Adenosine as a non-opioid analgesic in the perioperative setting. Anesth Analg 2007; 105:487–94

10. Eisenach JC, Rauck RL, Curry R: Intrathecal, but not intravenous adenosine reduces allodynia in patients with neuropathic pain. Pain 2003; 105:65–70

11. Matthes HW, Maldonado R, Simonin F, Valverde O, Slowe S, Kitchen I, Befort K, Dierich A, Le Meur M, Dolle P, Tzavara E, Hanoune J, Roques BP, Kieffer BL: Loss of morphine-induced analgesia, reward effect and withdrawal symptoms in mice lacking the mu-opioid-receptor gene. Nature 1996; 383:819–23

12. Bailey A, Matthes H, Kieffer B, Slowe S, Hourani SM, Kitchen I: Quantitative autoradiography of adenosine receptors and NBTI-sensitive adenosine transporters in the brains and spinal cords of mice deficient in the mu-opioid receptor gene. Brain Res 2002; 943:68–79

13. Lydic R, Baghdoyan HA: Sleep, anesthesiology, and the neurobiology of arousal state control. Anesthesiology 2005; 103:1268–95

14. Vanini G, Watson CJ, Lydic R, Baghdoyan HA: Gamma-aminobutyric acid-mediated neurotransmission in the pontine reticular formation modulates hypnosis, immobility, and breathing during isoflurane anesthesia. Anesthesiology 2008; 109:978–88

15. Kshatri AM, Baghdoyan HA, Lydic R: Cholinomimetics, but not morphine, increase antinociceptive behavior from pontine reticular regions regulating rapid- eye-movement sleep. Sleep 1998; 21:677–85

16. Watson CJ, Lydic R, Baghdoyan HA: Sleep and GABA levels in the oral part of rat pontine reticular formation are decreased by local and systemic administration of morphine. Neuroscience 2007; 144:375–86

17. Osman NI, Baghdoyan HA, Lydic R: Morphine inhibits acetylcholine release in rat prefrontal cortex when delivered systemically or by microdialysis to basal forebrain. Anesthesiology 2005; 103:779–87

18. Marks GA, Shaffery JP, Speciale SG, Birabil CG: Enhancement of rapid eye movement sleep in the rat by actions at A1 and A2a adenosine receptor subtypes with a differential sensitivity to atropine. Neuroscience 2003; 116:913–20

19. Coleman CG, Baghdoyan HA, Lydic R: Dialysis delivery of an adenosine A2A agonist into the pontine reticular formation of C57BL/6J mouse increases pontine acetylcholine release and sleep. J Neurochem 2006; 96:1750–9

20. Van Dort C, Baghdoyan HA, Lydic R: Adenosine A1 and A2A receptors in mouse prefrontal cortex modulate acetylcholine release and behavioral arousal. J Neurosci 2009; 29:871–81

21. Kalinchuk AV, Urrila AS, Alanko L, Heiskanen S, Wigren HK, Suomela M, Stenberg D, Porkka-Heiskanen T: Local energy depletion in the basal forebrain increases sleep. Eur J Neurosci 2003; 17:863–9

22. Paxinos G, Watson C: The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates, 6th edition. London, Elsevier, 2007

23. West BW, Welch KB, Galecki AG: Linear Mixed Models: A Practical Guide Using Statistical Software. Boca Raton, Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2006

24. Keifer JC, Baghdoyan HA, Lydic R: Sleep disruption and increased apneas after pontine microinjection of morphine. Anesthesiology 1992; 77:973–82

25. Lydic R, Keifer JC, Baghdoyan HA, Becker L: Microdialysis of the pontine reticular formation reveals inhibition of acetylcholine release by morphine. Anesthesiology 1993; 79:1003–12

26. Cronin A, Keifer JC, Baghdoyan HA, Lydic R: Opioid inhibition of rapid eye movement sleep by a specific mu receptor agonist. Br J Anaesth 1995; 74:188–92

27. Mortazavi S, Thompson J, Baghdoyan HA, Lydic R: Fentanyl and morphine, but not remifentanil, inhibit acetylcholine release in pontine regions modulating arousal. Anesthesiology 1999; 90:1070–7

28. Nelson LE, Guo TZ, Lu J, Saper CB, Franks NP, Maze M: The sedative component of anesthesia is mediated by GABAA receptors in an endogenous sleep pathway. Nat Neurosci 2002; 5:979–84

29. Nelson LE, Lu J, Guo T, Saper CB, Franks NP, Maze M: The α2-adrenoceptor agonist dexmedetomidine converges on an endogenous sleep-promoting pathway to exert its sedative effects. Anesthesiology 2003; 98:428–36

30. Tung A, Bergmann BM, Herrera S, Cao D, Mendelson WB: Recovery from sleep deprivation occurs during propofol anesthesia. Anesthesiology 2004; 100:1419–26

31. Alkire MT, McReynolds JR, Hahn EL, Trivedi AN: Thalamic microinjection of nicotine reverses sevoflurane-induced loss of righting reflex in the rat. Anesthesiology 2007; 107:264–72

32. Franks NP: General anaesthesia: From molecular targets to neuronal pathways of sleep and arousal. Nat Rev Neurosci 2008; 9:370–86

33. Kelz MB, Sun Y, Chen J, Cheng Meng Q, Moore JT, Veasey SC, Dixon S, Thornton M, Funato H, Yanagisawa M: An essential role for orexins in emergence from general anesthesia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008; 105:1309–14

34. Zecharia AY, Nelson LE, Gent TC, Schumacher M, Jurd R, Rudolph U, Brickley SG, Franks NP: The involvement of hypothalamic sleep pathways in general anesthesia: Testing the hypothesis using the GABA-A receptor β3 N265M knock-in mouse. J Neurosci 2009; 29:2177–87

35. Lydic R: Reticular modulation of breathing during sleep and anesthesia. Curr Opin Pulm Med 1996; 2:474–81

36. Hudetz AG, Wood JD, Kampine JP: Cholinergic reversal of isoflurane anesthesia in rats as measured by cross-approximate entropy of the electroencephalogram. Anesthesiology 2003; 99:1125–31

37. Meuret P, Backman SB, Bonhomme V, Plourde G, Fiset P: Physostigmine reverses propofol-induced unconsciousness and attenuation of the auditory steady state response and Bispectral Index in human volunteers. Anesthesiology 2000; 93:708–17

38. Nishino S, Sakurai T, editors: The Orexin/Hypocretin System. Totowa, New Jersey, Humana Press, 2006, pp 1–397

39. Sawynok J: Adenosine receptor activation and nociception. Eur J Pharmacol 1998; 347:1–11

40. Haulica I, Ababei L, Branisteanu D, Topoliceanu F: Preliminary data on the possible role of adenosine. J Neurochem 1973; 21:1019–20

41. Radulovacki M: Adenosine sleep theory: How I postulated it. Neurol Res 2005; 27:137–8

42. Steriade M, McCarley RW: Brain Control of Wakefulness and Sleep. New York, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press, 2005

43. Tanase D, Baghdoyan HA, Lydic R: Dialysis delivery of an adenosine A1 receptor agonist to the pontine reticular formation decreases acetylcholine release and increases anesthesia recovery time. Anesthesiology 2003; 98:912–20

44. Ribeiro JA, Sebastião AM, Mendonça A: Adenosine receptors in the nervous system: Pathophysiological implications. Prog Neurobiol 2003; 68:377–92

45. Tanase D, Martin WA, Baghdoyan HA, Lydic R: G protein activation in rat ponto-mesencephalic nuclei is enhanced by combined treatment with a mu opioid and an adenosine A1 receptor agonist. Sleep 2001; 24:52–62

46. Price DD: Psychological and neural mechanisms of the affective dimensions of pain. Science 2000; 288:1769–72

47. Tanase D, Baghdoyan HA, Lydic R: Microinjection of an adenosine A1 agonist into the medial pontine reticular formation increases tail flick latency to thermal stimulation. Anesthesiology 2002; 97:1597–601

48. Wang W, Baghdoyan HA, Lydic R: Leptin replacement restores supraspinal antinociception in leptin-deficient obese mice. J Pain 2009; 10:836–43

49. Portas CM, Thakkar M, Rainnie DG, Greene RW, McCarley RW: Role of adenosine in behavioral state modulation: A microdialysis study in the freely moving cat. Neuroscience 1997; 79:225–35

50. Alam MN, Szymusiak R, Gong H, King J, McGinty D: Adenosinergic modulation of rat basal forebrain neurons during sleep and waking: Neuronal recording with microdialysis. J Physiol 1999; 521(pt 3):679–90

51. Thakkar MM, Delgiacco RA, Strecker RE, McCarley RW: Adenosinergic inhibition of basal forebrain wakefulness-active neurons: A simultaneous unit recording and microdialysis study in freely behaving cats. Neuroscience 2003; 122:1107–13

52. Acquas E, Tanda G, Di Chiara G: Differential effects of caffeine on dopamine and acetylcholine transmission in brain areas of drug-naive and caffeine-pretreated rats. Neuropsychopharmacology 2002; 27:182–93

53. Zhu Z, Bowman HR, Baghdoyan HA, Lydic R: Morphine increases acetylcholine release in trigeminal nuclear complex. Sleep 2008; 31:1629–37

54. Maze M, Cibelli M, Grocott HP: Taking the lead in research into postoperative cognitive dysfunction. Anesthesiology 2008; 108:1–2

55. Monk TG, Weldon BC, Garvan CW, Dede DE, van der Aa MT, Heilman KM, Gravenstein JS: Predictors of cognitive dysfunction after major noncardiac surgery. Anesthesiology 2008; 108:18–30

56. Angst MS, Clark JD: Opioid-induced hyperalgesia. Anesthesiology 2006; 104:570–87

57. Berde CB, Brennan TJ, Raja SN: Opioids: More to learn, improvements to be made. Anesthesiology 2003; 98:1309–12

58. Corbett AD, Henderson G, McKight AT, Paterson SJ: 75 years of opioid research: The exciting but vain quest for the Holy Grail. Br J Pharmacol 2006; 147:S153–62

59. Simonnet G: Preemptive antihyperalgesia to improve preemptive analgesia. Anesthesiology 2008; 108:352–54

60. Bonica JJ: The Management of Pain, Vol. I. Philadelphia, Lea & Febiger, 1990

61. Naughton F, Ashworth P, Skevington SM: Does sleep quality predict pain-related disability in chronic pain patients? The mediating roles of depression and pain severity. Pain 2007; 127:243–52

62. Chee MW, Tan JC, Zheng H, Parimal S, Weissman DH, Zagorodnov V, Dinges DF: Lapsing during sleep deprivation is associated with distributed changes in brain activation. J Neurosci 2008; 28:5519–28

63. Wagner K, Willoch F, Kochs EF: Dose-dependent regional cerebral blood flow changes during remifentanil infusion in humans. Anesthesiology 2001; 94:732–9

64. Walder B, Tramèr MR, Blois R: The effects of two single doses of tramadol on sleep: A randomized, cross-over trial in healthy volunteers. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2001; 18:36–42

65. Shaw IR, Lavigne G, Mayer P, Choinière M: Acute intravenous administration of morphine perturbs sleep architecture in healthy pain-free young adults: A preliminary study. Sleep 2005; 28:677–82

66. Wang D, Teichtahl H: Opioids, sleep architecture, and sleep-disordered breathing. Sleep Med Rev 2007; 11:35–46

67. Greenwald MK, Roehrs TA: Mu-opioid self-administration versus passive administration in heroin abusers produces differential EEG activation. Neuropsychopharmacology 2005; 30:212–21

68. Menefee LA, Cohen MJA, Anderson WR, Doghramji K, Frank ED, Lee H: Sleep disturbance and nonmalignant chronic pain: A comprehensive review of the literature. Pain Med 2000; 1:156–72

69. Sebel PS, Bovill JG, Wauquier A, Rog P: Effects of high-dose fentanyl anesthesia on the electroencephalogram. Anesthesiology 1981; 55:203–11

70. Scott JC, Cooke JE, Stanski DR: Electroencephalographic quantification of opioid effects: Comparative pharmacokinetics of fentanyl and sufentanil. Anesthesiology 1991; 74:83–90

71. Bonafide CP, Aucutt-Walter N, DiVittore N, King T, Bixler EO, Cronin AJ: Remifentanil inhibits rapid eye movement sleep but not the nocturnal melatonin surge in humans. Anesthesiology 2008; 108:627–33

72. Haack M, Mullington JM: Sustained sleep restriction reduces emotional and physical well-being. Pain 2005; 119:56–64

73. Roehrs T, Hyde M, Blaisdell B, Greenwald M, Roth T: Sleep loss and REM sleep loss are hyperalgesic. Sleep 2006; 29:145–51

74. Smith MT, Edwards RR, McCann UD, Haythornthwaite JA: The effects of sleep deprivation on pain inhibition and spontaneous pain in women. Sleep 2007; 30:494–505

75. Chiari A, Yaksh TL, Myers RR, Provencher J, Moore L, Lee CS, Eisenach JC: Preclinical toxicity screening of intrathecal adenosine in rats and dogs. Anesthesiology 1999; 91:824–32

76. Chiari AI, Eisenach JC: Intrathecal adenosine: Interactions with spinal clonidine and neostigmine in rat models of acute nociception and postoperative hypersensitivity. Anesthesiology 1999; 90:1413–21

77. Gomes JA, Li X, Pan HL, Eisenach JC: Intrathecal adenosine interacts with a spinal noradrenergic system to produce antinociception in nerve-injured rats. Anesthesiology 1999; 91:1072–9

78. Lavand'homme PM, Eisenach JC: Exogenous and endogenous adenosine enhance the spinal antiallodynic effects of morphine in a rat model of neuropathic pain. Pain 1999; 80:31–6

79. Okada T, Mochizuki T, Huang Z-L, Eguchi N, Sugita Y, Urade Y, Hayaishi O: Dominant localization of adenosine deaminase in leptomeninges and involvement of the enzyme in sleep. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2003; 312:29–34

Cited By:

This article has been cited 4 time(s).

Purinergic Signalling
The mechanism of electrically stimulated adenosine release varies by brain region
Pajski, ML; Venton, BJ
Purinergic Signalling, 9(2): 167-174.
10.1007/s11302-012-9343-2
CrossRef
Neuroscience
Opiate-Induced Changes in Brain Adenosine Levels and Narcotic Drug Responses
Wu, M; Sahbaie, P; Zheng, M; Lobato, R; Boison, D; Clark, JD; Peltz, G
Neuroscience, 228(): 235-242.
10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.10.031
CrossRef
Anesthesiology
Anesthesia Teaching: Is It a Brave New World?
Lichtor, J
Anesthesiology, 112(5): 1063-1064.
10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181d692e3
PDF (103) | CrossRef
Anesthesiology
Opiates, Sleep, and Pain: The Adenosinergic Link
Moore, JT; Kelz, MB
Anesthesiology, 111(6): 1175-1176.
10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181bdfa2e
PDF (245) | CrossRef
Back to Top | Article Outline

© 2009 American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc.

Publication of an advertisement in Anesthesiology Online does not constitute endorsement by the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc. or Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. of the product or service being advertised.
Login

Article Tools

Images

Share