Basal Forebrain Histaminergic Transmission Modulates Electroencephalographic Activity and Emergence from Isoflurane Anesthesia
Luo, Tao M.D., Ph.D.*; Leung, L Stan Ph.D.†
Background: The tuberomammillary histaminergic neurons are involved in the sedative component of anesthetic action. The nucleus basalis magnocellularis (NBM) in the basal forebrain receives dense excitatory innervation from the tuberomammillary nucleus and is recognized as an important site of sleep-wake regulation. This study investigated whether NBM administration of histaminergic drugs may modulate arousal/emergence from isoflurane anesthesia.
Methods: Microinjections of histaminergic agonists and antagonists were made into the NBM of rats anesthetized with isoflurane. The changes in electroencephalographic activity, including electroencephalographic burst suppression ratio and power spectra, as well as respiratory rate, were recorded under basal conditions and after NBM injection. Time to resumption of righting reflex was recorded as a measure of emergence from anesthesia.
Results: The rats displayed a burst suppression electroencephalographic pattern at inhaled isoflurane concentrations of 1.4–2.1%. Application of histamine (1 μg/0.5 μl) to the NBM reversed the electroencephalographic depressant effect of isoflurane; i.e., electroencephalographic activity shifted from the burst suppression pattern toward delta activity at 1.4% isoflurane, and the burst suppression ratio decreased at 2.1% isoflurane. Histamine-evoked activation of electroencephalography was blocked by NBM pretreatment with a H1 receptor antagonist, triprolidine (5 μg/1 μl), but not by a H2 receptor antagonist, cimetidine (25 μg/1 μl). The respiratory rate was significantly increased after histamine injection. NBM application of histamine facilitated, while triprolidine delayed, emergence from isoflurane anesthesia.
Conclusions: Histamine activation of H1 receptors in the NBM induces electroencephalographic arousal and facilitates emergence from isoflurane anesthesia. The basal forebrain histaminergic pathway appears to play a role in modulating arousal/emergence from anesthesia.
NEURONAL histamine in the central nervous system plays a crucial role in the regulation of normal sleep-wake cycles.1
Histamine neurons in the brain are located predominantly in the tuberomammillary nucleus (TMN) of the posterior hypothalamus.2
Increased activity of the histaminergic neurons has been implicated in the facilitation of behavioral wakefulness.3,4
Histamine levels in the cortex are highest in active waking, lower in slow-wave sleep, and lowest during rapid eye movement sleep.5
Histamine acts on G-protein coupled receptors in the brain, with H1 and H2 receptors mainly exciting the postsynaptic membrane and H3 receptors suppressing the presynaptic release of histamine and other neurotransmitters.6
TMN neurons receive a strong γ-aminobutyric acid–mediated input, which is responsible for quieting them during sleep.7
Both in vivo
and in vitro
studies have shown that the sedative action of some general anesthetics (pentobarbital and propofol) is mediated by γ-aminobutyric acid receptor type A on TMN histaminergic neurons.8,9
The γ-aminobutyric acid–mediated anesthetic agents that act on γ-aminobutyric acid receptor type A may decrease TMN neuronal firing and histamine release, thus reducing histamine’s excitation of the cortical activation circuitry. If suppression of histamine release promotes sedation, it may be hypothesized that promoting histaminergic activity will decrease the depth of general anesthesia and facilitate emergence from anesthesia.
The basal forebrain is highly interconnected with a number of brain regions involved in sleep-wake regulation, including the noradrenergic neural networks of the locus coeruleus, serotonergic system of the dorsal raphe nucleus, as well as the TMN region.10–12
Extensive evidence indicates that the basal forebrain receives dense excitatory innervation from the TMN.13,14
The nucleus basalis magnocellularis (NBM) of the basal forebrain is important in the regulation of neocortical electrical activity,15,16
and histamine has been reported to modulate the activity of NBM neurons in both in vivo
and in vitro
Our laboratory has previously shown that selective inactivation of the basal forebrain structures potentiated the sedative effect of both intravenous and inhaled anesthetics.19
A study from Laalou et al.
further demonstrated that the anesthetic potency of propofol was increased in rats with a basal forebrain lesion.20
While these studies suggest an important role of the basal forebrain in mediating general anesthesia, the participation of histaminergic transmission in the basal forebrain has not been established.
The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of altering basal forebrain histaminergic transmission on arousal/emergence from isoflurane anesthesia. First, we evaluated the changes in electroencephalographic activity caused by administration of histamine into the NBM of isoflurane-anesthetized rats. Second, we investigated the histamine receptor subtype responsible for electroencephalographic activation. Third, we examined the influence of NBM administration of histaminergic drugs on the emergence time from isoflurane anesthesia.
Materials and Methods
Animals and Surgery
The experimental procedures and protocols used in this investigation were approved by the Animal Use Committee at the University of Western Ontario (London, Ontario, Canada). Male Long Evans rats weighing 240–280 g were housed under constant temperature (23 ± 1°C) and a 12 h light, 12 h dark cycle (light period starting at 07:00 h) with ad libitum access to food and water.
The rats were deeply anesthetized under sodium pentobarbital (60 mg/kg intraperitoneal) and placed in a stereotaxic frame. All coordinates were relative to the bregma, with the bregma and lambda on a horizontal plane according to the rat brain atlas of Paxinos and Watson.21
Electroencephalographic electrodes were placed in the left frontal cortex (A 3.7, L 3.2, and 1.7 mm deep [D]) and dorsal hippocampus (P −3.8, L ±2.5, D 3.3) from the skull surface. The electrodes were 125-μm stainless-steel wires that were Teflon-insulated except at the cut tips. A screw in the skull over the cerebellum served as both the recording reference and the recording ground. Stainless steel guide cannulae (23-gauge) were implanted bilaterally for subsequent infusions into the NBM (A −1.4, L ±2.5, D 8.5). The cannulae and electrodes were secured firmly to the skull with dental acrylic. The rats were allowed to recover from surgery for at least 7 days before experimentation.
All experiments were conducted between 9 and 19 h. The experimental design of this study is illustrated in figure 1A
. On the day of the experiment, anesthesia was initially induced in a chamber using 4–5% isoflurane (vaporizer setting) in 100% oxygen (2 l/min). After loss of the righting reflex (LORR) and evaluation of changes in respiratory rate, the animals were exposed to 1, 1.4, or 2.1% isoflurane (with 100% oxygen, flow rate 1 l/min) via
a facemask connected to a scavenging system. The isoflurane vaporizer was used throughout the study, and stability of output over time was verified by an infrared gas analyzer. The 1%, 1.4%, and 2.1% isoflurane were considered to be the minimum alveolar concentration values of 0.7, 1.0, and 1.5, respectively, in rats.22
Body temperature was determined rectally and maintained at 37.0–37.5°C with a heating lamp. In Experiment 1, a 30-gauge injection cannula was introduced through the guide cannula into the NBM after a 30-min equilibration period with 1.4% isoflurane. The injection cannula was connected to a 20-μl Hamilton syringe by means of polyethylene10 tubing, and saline or histamine (1 μg/0.5 μl) was bilaterally infused into the NBM over 5 min. This was followed by another 25 min of isoflurane administration to give a total isoflurane administration time of 60 min in which electroencephalography and behavior were studied. In Experiment 2, all rats were subjected to 2.1% isoflurane anesthesia for 60 min, and received an NBM injection of saline, histamine (1 μg/0.5 μl), selective H1 receptor antagonist triprolidine (5 μg/1 μl), or selective H2 receptor antagonist cimetidine (25 μg/1 μl) alone 30 min before discontinuing isoflurane. In Experiment 3, all rats were subjected to 2.1% isoflurane anesthesia for 60 min, and received an NBM injection of histamine 30 min before discontinuing isoflurane; with the addition of an NBM injection of triprolidine or cimetidine 10 min before histamine administration. Each rat was subjected to drug/vehicle application, in random order, separated by at least 4 days. In a separate experiment, the effect of isoflurane on cortical electroencephalographic activity was evaluated. Stable electroencephalographic signals were recorded in rats during awake immobility, and > 15 min after inhaling 1–2.1% isoflurane.
Electroencephalography Recording and Analyses
Electroencephalography at a depth electrode was recorded using the screw above the cerebellum as the reference. Electroencephalographic signals were amplified by Grass P511 amplifiers, recorded on paper, and digitized by a 12-bit analog to digital converter at 1 kilohertz. The high-pass filter was set at 0.3 hertz (Hz) (0.3-decibel drop-off point) on the Grass P511 amplifier. Averaging 5 consecutive points sampled at 1 kilohertz effectively reduced the sampling rate to 200 Hz and added a low-pass digital filter (0.3-decibel drop-off point) at 84 Hz. Electroencephalography was recorded every minute, starting immediately after the onset of LORR until the discontinuation of isoflurane. Every minute of digitized electroencephalography was manually reviewed to exclude segments with artifacts, and at least six segments of electroencephalography (> 30 s), each segment of 5.12 s and 1,024 points sampled at 200 Hz, were used for power spectral analysis.23
When isoflurane concentration was maintained at 1.4% or 2.1%, the cortical electroencephalography exhibited a burst suppression pattern; i.e.
, an electroencephalographic pattern where high-amplitude bursts are interrupted by low-amplitude suppressions. The burst suppression ratio (BSR) was calculated using previously established methods.24,25
Briefly, electroencephalography suppression was defined as amplitude less than a preset threshold value, and an electroencephalographic burst was terminated when the electroencephalographic amplitude returned to values below the threshold for 100 ms. The BSR was calculated as the percentage of electroencephalographic suppression in a 60-s interval. A BSR of 100% indicates electroencephalographic silence. The threshold values were manually estimated for each of the rats individually and were three SEM of the clearly nonbursting electroencephalography segments. The threshold values were chosen so that visual inspection confirmed that all or almost all periods with electroencephalographic silence were included as periods of electroencephalographic suppression.
Behavior was monitored continuously during the 60 min of anesthesia. The respiratory rate during anesthesia was measured as an index of the depth of anesthesia.26
In Experiment 2, after discontinuation of isoflurane, the animals were placed in the supine position, and the time to regain the righting reflex after the anesthetic vaporizer was shut off was recorded as the emergence time.
The following chemicals were purchased from Sigma- Aldrich Co. (Oakville, Ontario, Canada): histamine (H7125), cimetidine (C4522), and triprolidine (T6764). Cimetidine was dissolved in 0.15 m hydrochloric acid with saline and then adjusted to neutral pH with 1 m sodium hydroxide. All other drugs were dissolved in 0.9% physiologic saline solution and administered intracerebrally in a volume of 0.5–1.0 μl. The histamine doses chosen for this study were based on previous in vivo
experiments. Histamine at doses of 5–60 μg/μl in the hypothalamus,27
and 1–200 μg in the nucleus accumbens were found to induce behavior arousal.28
The doses of triprolidine and cimetidine were chosen based on their ability to fully block the histamine responses in vitro
and confirmed by our own preliminary results in vivo
. In studies based on intracerebral infusion of muscimol,23,31
a γ-aminobutyric acid receptor type A agonist with a molecular weight in the same order of magnitude as histamine, triprolidine, and cimetidine, was found to spread < 1 mm outside of the targeted area. Thus, a histaminergic drug is expected to exert an effect within 1 mm of the intended target in the NBM.
On completion of the experiments, all rats were killed with an overdose of urethane and then perfused intracardially with 0.9% saline followed by 10% formalin. The electrodes and the sites of cannula infusion were verified in 60-μm frozen sections of the brain stained with thionin. Only data from rats with cannulae confirmed at the intended sites were used for analyses. A representative histologic micrograph showing the location of the ventral tip of the microinjection cannula in the NBM is shown in figure 1B
Data were expressed as mean ± SEM. GraphPad Prism software version 4.0 (GraphPad Prism, Inc., San Diego, CA) was used for the statistical evaluation. The effect of histamine on electroencephalographic power was evaluated by paired t test. Within-group analysis for electroencephalographic BSR were conducted by one-way ANOVA, with time as the repeated measure to determine whether a treatment had a significant effect within each experimental group, and between-group comparisons for electroencephalographic BSR were compared using two-way ANOVA (drug × time) with repeated measures on one variable (time). Post hoc between-group comparisons of specific samples were performed using t tests with Bonferroni corrections. The effects of histaminergic agent on respiratory rate and emergence from isoflurane anesthesia were evaluated by one-way ANOVA, followed by post hoc analysis (Bonferroni). P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
Administration of Histamine to NBM Induces Electroencephalographic Activation
The neocortical (frontal cortical) electroencephalography in the rat showed a desynchronized or low-voltage fast activity pattern during awake immobility (fig. 2A
). The electroencephalographic pattern changed with increasing concentration of inhaled isoflurane (fig. 2B and D
), illustrated in each case after 15 min of inhaling isoflurane at a particular concentration. The rats showed no spontaneous movement with isoflurane concentration at 1%. As compared with the awake immobile electroencephalography, 1% isoflurane increased electroencephalographic power at the delta frequency (1–4 Hz) range and decreased power at > 30 Hz (fig. 2B
). Increasing isoflurane to 1.4% resulted in a burst suppression pattern; i.e.
, high-amplitude burst activity alternating with suppressed background activity (fig. 2C
). Further increase of isoflurane to 2.1% led to a prevailing isoelectric activity of the electroencephalography, shown as a low-amplitude power spectrum across all frequencies (fig. 2D
The effect of histamine on electroencephalographic activation was first examined under 1.4% isoflurane anesthesia. Figure 3
illustrates two experiments from the same rat, first infused with vehicle (saline) bilaterally into the NBM, and then 4 days later with histamine bilaterally into the NBM. There was no change in the neocortical or hippocampal electroencephalographic pattern after saline infusion in the NBM, also confirmed by the electroencephalographic power spectra (fig. 3A and C
). However, infusion of histamine (1 μg/0.5 μl) into the NBM produced a strong activation response in the neocortical electroencephalography, characterized by a shift of electroencephalography from burst suppression pattern to slow-wave (δ) activity (fig. 3B
). This activation was observed within approximately 7 min after the start of histamine infusion. In all six rats tested, the neocortical electroencephalography did not return to the preinfusion baseline level, even at 25 min after histamine. Power spectral analysis showed that, as compared with baseline, NBM infusion of histamine increased the neocortical electroencephalographic power within the δ (1–3.9 Hz) and θ (4–12 Hz) frequency bands (P
< 0.01 and P
< 0.05, respectively; n = 6; paired t
test; fig. 3D
). Hippocampal electroencephalography also showed an increase in δ power after histamine infusion in the NBM, with no change in the θ electroencephalographic power (data not shown). Neocortical (and hippocampal) electroencephalographic power in the β (13–30 Hz) and γ (30–100 Hz) frequency bands was not significantly affected by histamine at 1.4% isoflurane.
At clinically relevant anesthetic concentrations, isoflurane was found to dose-dependently increase the burst-suppression ratio.32
To further confirm and quantify histamine’s effect on electroencephalographic activation, histamine or saline was infused into the NBM of rats under 2.1% isoflurane anesthesia. The average preinfusion BSR was similar in the saline and histamine experiments (93.20 ± 1.27% for saline and 93.70 ± 1.80% for histamine, P
> 0.05, n = 8). Histamine (1 μg/0.5 μl), but not saline, infused into the NBM induced a significant decrease in BSR (fig. 4
). Two-way ANOVA revealed a significant drug effect (F[1,420] = 24.13, P
< 0.0001, n = 8), time effect (F[29,420] = 3.57, P
< 0.0001, n = 8), and drug × time interaction (F[29,420] = 2.87, P
< 0.0001, n = 8). Post hoc
comparisons showed a significant difference between the saline and histamine groups at 6–9 min after the start of histamine infusion. The changes of the hippocampal electroencephalographic BSR induced by histaminergic agents were similar to those of the neocortical electroencephalography, so only data from cortical electroencephalography were presented.
H1 but Not H2 Receptor Antagonist Delivered to the NBM Antagonized the Electroencephalographic Activation Elicited by Histamine
Antagonists of H1 and H2 receptors were infused directly into the NBM to reveal the specific receptor underlying the electroencephalographic activation effect of histamine (fig. 5
). Under 2.1% isoflurane, NBM infusion of H1 (5 μg/1 μl triprolidine) or H2 (25 μg/1 μl cimetidine) receptor antagonist did not significantly change the baseline BSR. However, when pretreated with triprolidine, histamine (1 μg/0.5 μl) failed to induce a significant change in the BSR of the electroencephalography (fig. 5, A and C
). Two-way ANOVA showed no significant drug effect for histamine when pretreated with triprolidine, as compared to triprolidine alone (F[1,390] = 0.003, P
> 0.05, n = 7 and 8), suggesting that triprolidine attenuated the electroencephalographic activation in response to histamine. On the other hand, pretreatment with the H2 antagonist cimetidine did not affect the histamine-induced suppression of BSR (fig. 5, B and D
). The main effect of cimetidine and then histamine, as compared with cimetidine alone, was significant (F[1,390] = 169.49, P
< 0.0001; n = 7 and 8, two-way ANOVA]. These results indicate that histamine-induced electroencephalographic activation during isoflurane anesthesia was mainly mediated by H1 receptors in the NBM.
NBM Administration of Histaminergic Agents Modulated Respiratory Rate and Emergence from Isoflurane Anesthesia
Histamine produced a small but statistically significant increase in respiratory rate at 5 min after NBM infusion during 2.1% isoflurane anesthesia (P
< 0.05 or P
< 0.001, Bonferroni’s post hoc
other groups, one way ANOVA, n = 8; fig. 6A
). However, triprolidine or cimetidine, as compared with saline, administered to the NBM induced no significant changes in respiratory rate (P
> 0.05, Bonferroni’s post hoc
test after one way ANOVA, n = 8; fig. 6A
Emergency from anesthesia was defined as regaining the righting reflex. Emergence was associated with a low-voltage fast-frequency (desynchronized) electroencephalography, and this electroencephalographic pattern was similar among all groups. After 60 min exposure to 2.1% isoflurane, the time to recover the righting reflex (emergence time, Fig. 6B
) was significantly reduced in rats infused with histamine (1 μg/0.5 μl) in the NBM, as compared with those infused with saline in the NBM (11.59 ± 2.12 min for saline group vs.
4.04 ± 0.49 min for histamine group, P
< 0.05 by one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post hoc
test, n = 8). In contrast, rats infused with the H1 receptor antagonist triprolidine (5 μg/1 μl) in the NBM required a significantly longer time to regain the righting reflex (19.69 ± 2.48 min), as compared with rats with saline infused in the NBM (P
< 0.05, one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post hoc
test, n = 8). H2 receptor antagonist cimetidine (25 μg/1 μl) infused in the NBM had no significant effect on the emergence time (11.52 ± 1.18 min), as compared with saline-treated rats (P
> 0.05, one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post hoc
test, n = 8).
The results of this study showed that acute administration of histamine into the NBM of the basal forebrain induced electroencephalographic activation, increased respiratory rate, and accelerated emergence from isoflurane anesthesia. In contrast, administration of the H1 receptor antagonist blocked the electroencephalographic activation induced by histamine and delayed emergence from anesthesia. The study suggests a possible role of the basal forebrain histaminergic pathway in modulating arousal/emergence from isoflurane anesthesia.
Electroencephalography is a continuous, noninvasive method that has been used as a measure of anesthetic drug action on the central nervous system.33
In the current study, a stable steady-state electroencephalographic pattern was observed after 15 min administration of isoflurane at a particular concentration. In line with previous findings, the effects of isoflurane-induced electroencephalographic slowing, burst suppression, and isoelectric activity were concentration dependent.34
At 2.1% isoflurane, infusion of histamine into the NBM decreased the BSR. At 1.4% isoflurane, histamine shifted the neocortical electroencephalography from a burst suppression pattern to δ activity, with power that spilled into the adjacent θ frequency band. This evidence indicates that histamine, when applied into the NBM, can modulate electroencephalographic activity during isoflurane anesthesia.
Histamine-induced electroencephalographic activation was greatly attenuated by triprolidine but not by cimetidine, suggesting that the cortical activation effect of histamine involved H1 receptors in the NBM. Activation of H1 receptors leads to a depolarization and/or an increase in the firing frequency of neurons.6
In the basal forebrain, a clear interaction has been demonstrated between the central histaminergic and cholinergic pathways. In vitro
study revealed that histamine could depolarize NBM cholinergic cells mainly through H1 receptors in basal forebrain slices.17
Moreover, microdialysis of histamine or H1 receptor agonist into the basal forebrain resulted in increased release of acetylcholine from the neocortex.18
Histamine was also found to excite noncholinergic cells, including the γ-aminobutyric acid–mediated and glutamatergic neurons in the basal forebrain.35,36
Thus, histamine likely influenced neocortical electroencephalographic activity by action on both cholinergic and noncholinergic cells in the NBM. Furthermore, histamine is known to activate N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptors, which has been implicated in the induction of burst suppression by isoflurane.34,37
In addition to electroencephalographic activation, histamine application into the NBM significantly increased the rate of respiration, suggesting a behaviorally arousing effect. H1 receptor antagonist triprolidine and H2 receptor antagonist cimetidine had no effect on the breathing rate during isoflurane anesthesia. The lack of effect on breathing rate by triprolidine or cimetidine could be because of a floor effect caused by the rapid and powerful depressant action of isoflurane on breathing rate. It is believed that histamine might affect the breathing pattern centrally via
Recent studies suggest that natural sleep and anesthesia may share similar neuronal pathways. Histamine release in the brain is strongly related to the sleep-wake cycle, with higher level of histamine during wake episodes than during sleep episodes.39
Similarly, the release of histamine was significantly increased with a decrease in inhaled anesthetic concentration.40
In this study, a facilitation of behavioral arousal was demonstrated after NBM infusion of histamine when the animals were allowed to emerge from anesthesia after administration of 2.1% isoflurane was stopped. This finding is consistent with a previous report, which showed that intraventricular administration of high doses (5–25 μg) of histamine decreased the duration of LORR in pentobarbital-anesthetized rats.41
More importantly, we found that the time to emerge from isoflurane anesthesia was prolonged by NBM administration of the H1 receptor antagonist triprolidine. However, the same dose of triprolidine itself could not induce anesthesia or LORR in rats (data not shown). Considering that triprolidine would block the action of endogenous histamine at postsynaptic H1 receptors, we suggest that physiologic activation of the basal forebrain endogenous histaminergic pathway is involved in emergence from general anesthesia.
In addition to histamine, evidence also suggests that other neurotransmitters can modulate anesthesia response via
actions on the wakefulness-promoting basal forebrain area. For example, orexin-A, a regulatory peptide that promotes wakefulness, administered in the basal forebrain induced signs of electroencephalographic arousal in rats during isoflurane anesthesia.42
Adenosine, a putative sleep factor, can affect the anesthetic action of isoflurane via
the neurons of the basal forebrain.43
It has also been previously demonstrated that selective lesion of the cholinergic neurons in the NBM potentiated the anesthetic effects of propofol.20
All these findings support the essential role of the basal forebrain as an important pathway for activating the cortex.44
While a number of studies in the past have attempted to describe the neural mechanism underlying anesthetic-induced unconsciousness, little attention has been paid to neural circuits responsible for emergence from anesthesia. A recent elegant study by Kelz et al.
using genetic ablation of orexinergic neurons and a selective orexin-A receptor antagonist, demonstrated the role of the endogenous orexin system in the emergence from, but not the entry into, the anesthetized state. The arousal effect of orexin-A may depend on the activation of histaminergic neurotransmission via
H1 receptors. Orexin infusion increases histamine release and wakefulness in normal but not in H1 receptor knockout mice.46
To the best of our knowledge, this study presented the first evidence for the role of the basal forebrain as a possible neural locus, with the histaminergic pathway as a mechanism, in the emergence from anesthesia.
Our study has some limitations, the most important of which is that electroencephalographic activation during isoflurane anesthesia is not accompanied by a full behavioral arousal. Previous studies showed that behavioral reversal of anesthesia occurred at an anesthetic concentration only slightly above that causing LORR.47,48
In this study, higher concentrations of isoflurane were used to study the electroencephalographic changes modulated by histaminergic agents. Despite the lack of full behavioral arousal from anesthesia, we did find that histamine administration in the NBM increased the respiratory rate, which is a behavioral sign of a decreased depth of anesthesia. Histamine may not provide relief for all effects of isoflurane in the brain,49–51
in particular in areas outside of the forebrain.52,53
Second, the effect of histaminergic drugs on the induction of anesthesia was not examined in this study. Mammoto et al.40
previously reported that systemic administration of an H1 antagonist decreased the anesthetic requirement for halothane evaluated as the minimum alveolar concentration, indicating that changes in histaminergic neuronal activities affect anesthetic requirement. Our finding, along with that of Mammoto et al.
, suggests that endogenous histamine system might be essential to both the induction and emergence from general anesthesia. However, the exact role of the basal forebrain in the induction of anesthesia needs to be further studied.
In clinical practice, preoperative administration of antihistamines causes a delayed recovery of consciousness after anesthesia.54
The results of this study suggest that histamine activation of H1 receptors in the NBM induces electroencephalographic arousal and facilitates emergence from isoflurane anesthesia. These findings support the hypothesis that the basal forebrain histaminergic pathway appears to play a role in modulating arousal/emergence from anesthesia.
The authors thank Franco Pavan, Respiratory Therapist, Respiratory Therapy Unit, London Health Sciences Centre, for help with measuring isoflurane concentration.
1. Parmentier R, Ohtsu H, Djebbara-Hannas Z, Valatx JL, Watanabe T, Lin JS: Anatomical, physiological, and pharmacological characteristics of histidine decarboxylase knock-out mice: Evidence for the role of brain histamine in behavioral and sleep-wake control. J Neurosci 2002; 22:7695–711
2. Panula P, Yang HY, Costa E: Histamine-containing neurons in the rat hypothalamus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1984; 81:2572–6
3. Takahashi K, Lin JS, Sakai K: Neuronal activity of histaminergic tuberomammillary neurons during wake-sleep states in the mouse. J Neurosci 2006; 26:10292–8
4. Ko EM, Estabrooke IV, McCarthy M, Scammell TE: Wake-related activity of tuberomammillary neurons in rats. Brain Res 2003; 992:220–6
5. Strecker RE, Nalwalk J, Dauphin LJ, Thakkar MM, Chen Y, Ramesh V, Hough LB, McCarley RW: Extracellular histamine levels in the feline preoptic/anterior hypothalamic area during natural sleep-wakefulness and prolonged wakefulness: an in vivo
microdialysis study. Neuroscience 2002; 113:663–70
6. Haas H, Panula P: The role of histamine and the tuberomamillary nucleus in the nervous system. Nat Rev Neurosci 2003; 4:121–30
7. Sherin JE, Elmquist JK, Torrealba F, Saper CB: Innervation of histaminergic tuberomammillary neurons by GABAergic and galaninergic neurons in the ventrolateral preoptic nucleus of the rat. J Neurosci 1998; 18:4705–21
8. Nelson LE, Guo TZ, Lu J, Saper CB, Franks NP, Maze M: The sedative component of anesthesia is mediated by GABA(A) receptors in an endogenous sleep pathway. Nat Neurosci 2002; 5:979–84
9. Zecharia AY, Nelson LE, Gent TC, Schumacher M, Jurd R, Rudolph U, Brickley SG, Maze M, Franks NP: The involvement of hypothalamic sleep pathways in general anesthesia: Testing the hypothesis using the GABAA receptor beta3N265M knock-in mouse. J Neurosci 2009; 29:2177–87
10. España RA, Berridge CW: Organization of noradrenergic efferents to arousal-related basal forebrain structures. J Comp Neurol 2006; 496:668–83
11. Cape EG, Jones BE: Differential modulation of high-frequency gamma-electroencephalogram activity and sleep-wake state by noradrenaline and serotonin microinjections into the region of cholinergic basalis neurons. J Neurosci 1998; 18:2653–66
12. Ramesh V, Thakkar MM, Strecker RE, Basheer R, McCarley RW: Wakefulness-inducing effects of histamine in the basal forebrain of freely moving rats. Behav Brain Res 2004; 152:271–8
13. Köhler C, Swanson LW, Haglund L, Wu JY: The cytoarchitecture, histochemistry and projections of the tuberomammillary nucleus in the rat. Neuroscience 1985; 16:85–110
14. Bouthenet ML, Ruat M, Sales N, Garbarg M, Schwartz JC: A detailed mapping of histamine H1-receptors in guinea-pig central nervous system established by autoradiography with [125I]iodobolpyramine. Neuroscience 1988; 26:553–600
15. Jones BE: Activity, modulation and role of basal forebrain cholinergic neurons innervating the cerebral cortex. Prog Brain Res 2004; 145:157–69
16. Vanderwolf CH: Cerebral activity and behavior: Control by central cholinergic and serotonergic systems. Int Rev Neurobiol 1988; 30:225–340
17. Khateb A, Fort P, Pegna A, Jones BE, Mühlethaler M: Cholinergic nucleus basalis neurons are excited by histamine in vitro
. Neuroscience 1995; 69:495–506
18. Cecchi M, Passani MB, Bacciottini L, Mannaioni PF, Blandina P: Cortical acetylcholine release elicited by stimulation of histamine H1 receptors in the nucleus basalis magnocellularis: A dual-probe microdialysis study in the freely moving rat. Eur J Neurosci 2001; 13:68–78
19. Ma J, Shen B, Stewart LS, Herrick IA, Leung LS: The septohippocampal system participates in general anesthesia. J Neurosci 2002; 22:RC200
20. Laalou FZ, de Vasconcelos AP, Oberling P, Jeltsch H, Cassel JC, Pain L: Involvement of the basal cholinergic forebrain in the mediation of general (propofol) anesthesia. Anesthesiology 2008; 108:888–96
21. Paxinos G, Watson C: The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates. 4th Edition. San Diego, Academic Press, 1998
22. White PF, Johnston RR, Eger EI 2nd: Determination of anesthetic requirement in rats. Anesthesiology 1974; 40:52–7
23. Ma J, Leung LS: Limbic system participates in mediating the effects of general anesthetics. Neuropsychopharmacology 2006; 31:1177–92
24. van den Broek PL, van Rijn CM, van Egmond J, Coenen AM, Booij LH: An effective correlation dimension and burst suppression ratio of the EEG in rat. Correlation with sevoflurane induced anaesthetic depth. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2006; 23:391–402
25. Vijn PC, Sneyd JR: I.v. anaesthesia and EEG burst suppression in rats: Bolus injections and closed-loop infusions. Br J Anaesth 1998; 81:415–21
26. Kushikata T, Hirota K, Yoshida H, Kudo M, Lambert DG, Smart D, Jerman JC, Matsuki A: Orexinergic neurons and barbiturate anesthesia. Neuroscience 2003; 121:855–63
27. Lin JS, Sakai K, Jouvet M: Evidence for histaminergic arousal mechanisms in the hypothalamus of cat. Neuropharmacology 1988; 27:111–22
28. Bristow LJ, Bennett GW: Biphasic effects of intra-accumbens histamine administration on spontaneous motor activity in the rat; a role for central histamine receptors. Br J Pharmacol 1988; 95:1292–302
29. Whyment AD, Blanks AM, Lee K, Renaud LP, Spanswick D: Histamine excites neonatal rat sympathetic preganglionic neurons in vitro via
activation of H1 receptors. J Neurophysiol 2006; 95:2492–500
30. Korotkova TM, Sergeeva OA, Ponomarenko AA, Haas HL: Histamine excites noradrenergic neurons in locus coeruleus in rats. Neuropharmacology 2005; 49:129–34
31. Allen TA, Narayanan NS, Kholodar-Smith DB, Zhao Y, Laubach M, Brown TH: Imaging the spread of reversible brain inactivations using fluorescent muscimol. J Neurosci Methods 2008; 171:30–8
32. Rampil IJ, Laster MJ: No correlation between quantitative electroencephalographic measurements and movement response to noxious stimuli during isoflurane anesthesia in rats. Anesthesiology 1992; 77:920–5
33. Rampil IJ: A primer for EEG signal processing in anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1998; 89:980–1002
34. Lukatch HS, Kiddoo CE, Maciver MB: Anesthetic-induced burst suppression EEG activity requires glutamate-mediated excitatory synaptic transmission. Cereb Cortex 2005; 15:1322–31
35. Fort P, Khateb A, Serafin M, Mühlethaler M, Jones BE: Pharmacological characterization and differentiation of non-cholinergic nucleus basalis neurons in vitro
. Neuroreport 1998; 9:61–5
36. Xu C, Michelsen KA, Wu M, Morozova E, Panula P, Alreja M: Histamine innervation and activation of septohippocampal GABAergic neurones: Involvement of local ACh release. J Physiol 2004; 561:657–70
37. Bekkers JM: Enhancement by histamine of NMDA-mediated synaptic transmission in the hippocampus. Science 1993; 261:104–6
38. Dutschmann M, Bischoff AM, Büsselberg D, Richter DW: Histaminergic modulation of the intact respiratory network of adult mice. Pflugers Arch 2003; 445:570–6
39. Chu M, Huang ZL, Qu WM, Eguchi N, Yao MH, Urade Y: Extracellular histamine level in the frontal cortex is positively correlated with the amount of wakefulness in rats. Neurosci Res 2004; 49:417–20
40. Mammoto T, Yamamoto Y, Kagawa K, Hayashi Y, Mashimo T, Yoshiya I, Yamatodani A: Interactions between neuronal histamine and halothane anesthesia in rats. J Neurochem 1997; 69:406–11
41. Kalivas PW: Histamine-induced arousal in the conscious and pentobarbital-pretreated rat. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1982; 222:37–42
42. Dong HL, Fukuda S, Murata E, Zhu Z, Higuchi T: Orexins increase cortical acetylcholine release and electroencephalographic activation through orexin-1 receptor in the rat basal forebrain during isoflurane anesthesia. Anesthesiology 2006; 104:1023–32
43. Tung A, Herrera S, Szafran MJ, Kasza K, Mendelson WB: Effect of sleep deprivation on righting reflex in the rat is partially reversed by administration of adenosine A1 and A2 receptor antagonists. Anesthesiology 2005; 102:1158–64
44. Dringenberg HC, Vanderwolf CH: Involvement of direct and indirect pathways in electrocorticographic activation. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 1998; 22:243–57
45. Kelz MB, Sun Y, Chen J, Cheng Meng Q, Moore JT, Veasey SC, Dixon S, Thornton M, Funato H, Yanagisawa M: An essential role for orexins in emergence from general anesthesia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008; 105:1309–14
46. Huang ZL, Qu WM, Li WD, Mochizuki T, Eguchi N, Watanabe T, Urade Y, Hayaishi O: Arousal effect of orexin A depends on activation of the histaminergic system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001; 98:9965–70
47. Alkire MT, McReynolds JR, Hahn EL, Trivedi AN: Thalamic microinjection of nicotine reverses sevoflurane-induced loss of righting reflex in the rat. Anesthesiology 2007; 107:264–72
48. Hudetz AG, Wood JD, Kampine JP: Cholinergic reversal of isoflurane anesthesia in rats as measured by cross-approximate entropy of the electroencephalogram. Anesthesiology 2003; 99:1125–31
49. Vahle-Hinz C, Detsch O, Siemers M, Kochs E: Contributions of GABAergic and glutamatergic mechanisms to isoflurane-induced suppression of thalamic somatosensory information transfer. Exp Brain Res 2007; 176:159–72
50. Linden AM, Aller MI, Leppä E, Vekovischeva O, Aitta-Aho T, Veale EL, Mathie A, Rosenberg P, Wisden W, Korpi ER: The in vivo
contributions of TASK-1-containing channels to the actions of inhalation anesthetics, the alpha(2) adrenergic sedative dexmedetomidine, and cannabinoid agonists. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2006; 317:615–26
51. Antognini JF, Atherley R, Carstens E: Isoflurane action in spinal cord indirectly depresses cortical activity associated with electrical stimulation of the reticular formation. Anesth Analg 2003; 96:999–1003
52. Caraiscos VB, Newell JG, You-Ten KE, Elliott EM, Rosahl TW, Wafford KA, MacDonald JF, Orser BA: Selective enhancement of tonic GABAergic inhibition in murine hippocampal neurons by low concentrations of the volatile anesthetic isoflurane. J Neurosci 2004; 24:8454–8
53. Nishikawa K, MacIver MB: Agent-selective effects of volatile anesthetics on GABAA receptor-mediated synaptic inhibition in hippocampal interneurons. Anesthesiology 2001; 94:340–7
54. Caplin D, Smith C: A comparison of the anti-emetic effects of dimenhydrinate, promethazine hydrochloride and chlorpromazine following anaesthesia. Can J Anaesth 1955; 2:191–7
This article has been cited 4 time(s).
Experimental NeurologyMedial septal lesion enhances general anesthesia responseExperimental Neurology
Journal of Neural EngineeringBurst suppression probability algorithms: state-space methods for tracking EEG burst suppressionJournal of Neural Engineering
Journal of Neural EngineeringA closed-loop anesthetic delivery system for real-time control of burst suppressionJournal of Neural Engineering
AnesthesiologyGeneral Anesthesia and Ascending Arousal PathwaysAnesthesiology
© 2009 American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc.
Publication of an advertisement in Anesthesiology Online does not constitute endorsement by the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc. or Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. of the product or service being advertised.