Skip Navigation LinksHome > August 2009 - Volume 111 - Issue 2 > Three Editorials—Three Historical Allusions
Anesthesiology:
doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181ac718f
Correspondence

Three Editorials—Three Historical Allusions

Davidson, Andrew M.B.B.S., M.D., F.A.N.Z.C.A.

Free Access
Article Outline
Collapse Box

Author Information

In Reply:— I thank Professor Roy for his interesting comments regarding our recent article.1 To continue the historical allusion, in 1822 Dr. Buchan, a Scottish physician, wrote: “It is really astonishing, that so little attention should in general be paid to the preservation of infants. What labor and expense are daily bestowed to prop an old tottering carcase for a few years while thousands of those who might be useful in life perish without being regarded!”2 Since then infant mortality has certainly improved, at least in the developed world, but in 2009 a large proportion of drugs including anesthetics still have no infant labeling. Sufficient research to demonstrate efficacy or safety has simply not been done. Almost 200 yr after Dr. Buchan made his observations, infants are still relatively disadvantaged.
Andrew Davidson, M.B.B.S., M.D., F.A.N.Z.C.A.
Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia. andrew.davidson@rch.org.au
Back to Top | Article Outline

References

1. Davidson AJ, McCann ME, Morton NS, Myles PS: Anesthesia and outcome after neonatal surgery: The role for randomised trials. Anesthesiology 2008; 109:941–4

2. Buchan W: Domestic Medicine. London, W. Lewis, 1822

© 2009 American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc.

Publication of an advertisement in Anesthesiology Online does not constitute endorsement by the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc. or Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. of the product or service being advertised.
Login

Article Tools

Share