Skip Navigation LinksHome > June 2009 - Volume 110 - Issue 6 > Sevoflurane Preconditioning against Focal Cerebral Ischemia:...
Anesthesiology:
doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181a1fe68
Perioperative Medicine

Sevoflurane Preconditioning against Focal Cerebral Ischemia: Inhibition of Apoptosis in the Face of Transient Improvement of Neurological Outcome

Codaccioni, Jean-Laurent M.D.*; Velly, Lionel J. M.D.†; Moubarik, Chahrazad Ph.D.‡; Bruder, Nicolas J. M.D.§; Pisano, Pascale S. Ph.D.∥; Guillet, Benjamin A. Ph.D#

Free Access
Article Outline
Collapse Box

Author Information

Collapse Box

Abstract

Background: Preconditioning the brain with volatile anesthetics seems to be a viable option for reducing ischemic cerebral injury. However, it is uncertain whether this preconditioning effect extends over a longer period of time. The purpose of this study was to determine if sevoflurane preconditioning offers durable neuroprotection against cerebral ischemia.
Methods: Rats (Sprague-Dawley) were randomly allocated to two groups: nonpreconditioned control group (n = 44) and preconditioned group (n = 45) exposed to 2.7 vol% sevoflurane (45 min) 60 min before surgery. Animals in both groups were anesthetized with 3.0vol% sevoflurane and subjected to transient middle cerebral artery occlusion. After 60 min of awake focal ischemia, the filament was removed. Functional neurologic outcome (range 0–18; 0 = no deficit), cerebral infarct size (Nissl staining), and apoptosis (Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated 2′-deoxyuridine 5′-triphosphate nick-end labeling; cleaved caspase-3 staining) were evaluated at 3, 7, and 14 days after ischemia.
Results: Sevoflurane preconditioning significantly improved functional outcome and reduced infarct volume (109 ± 43 vs. 148 ± 56 mm3) 3 days after ischemia compared to the control group. However, after 7- and 14-day recovery periods, no significant differences were observed between groups. The number of apoptotic cells was significantly lower in the preconditioned group than in the control group after 3- and 7-day recovery periods. Fourteen days after ischemia, no differences were observed between groups.
Conclusion: In this model of transient focal cerebral ischemia, sevoflurane preconditioning induced effective but transient neuroprotective effects. Sevoflurane preconditioning also decreased ischemia-induced apoptosis in a more sustained way because it was observed up to 7 days after injury.
VOLATILE anesthetics exert direct neuroprotective effects when they are present during ischemia in vitro1 and in vivo2 and also when they are administered before an ischemic insult3 (anesthetic preconditioning [APC]). APC was first described in the heart4 and more recently in both in vitro5,6 and in vivo6–11 models of cerebral ischemia. In particular, sevoflurane preconditioning has been shown to reduce in vitro hippocampal neuronal damage after hypoxia5 and in vivo after global cerebral ischemia.12 Most of these studies on cerebral APC have assessed histopathological and neurologic outcomes for a period of less than 7 days after injury. It is therefore uncertain whether this preconditioning effect extends over a longer period of time. As Kawaguchi et al.13 reported in their study on the direct neuroprotection afforded by volatile anesthetics, the role of neuronal apoptosis is central in the pathogenesis of cerebral ischemia. This study shows that volatile anesthetics delayed but did not prevent neuronal apoptosis after focal cerebral ischemia. The effect of APC on neuronal apoptosis is still poorly explored. Only indirect effects have been reported by Zhao et al.14 who showed during APC against neonatal hypoxic-ischemic brain injury an increase in expression of the antiapoptotic protein B-cell lymphoma-2.
In this context, we first studied the time-course of neuroprotection induced by sevoflurane preconditioning by using an in vivo model of transient focal cerebral ischemia in the rat. Neuroprotection was assessed by neurologic and histopathological evaluations for 14 days after ischemia. Second, we explored whether sevoflurane preconditioning interfered with ischemia-induced apoptosis. Our hypothesis was that sevoflurane administered before the ischemic insult (APC) would induce a greater neuroprotective effect than administration during the ischemic time alone (direct neuroprotection).
Back to Top | Article Outline

Materials and Methods

This study, including care of the animals involved, was conducted according to the official edict presented by the French Ministry of Agriculture (Paris, France) and the recommendations of the Helsinki Declaration. The experiments were performed after approval of the protocol by the Institution's Animal Care and Use Committee (Université de la Méditerranée, Marseille, France), in an authorized laboratory, and under the supervision of an authorized researcher (Dr. Pisano; authorization N°: 13–59). Sprague-Dawley rats (200–250 g) fasted overnight were randomly allocated to the control group (n = 44) or preconditioned group (n = 45).
Back to Top | Article Outline
Transient Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion
Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Image Tools
In the preconditioned group, animals were intubated and ventilated mechanically (Microvent 1; Hallowell EMC, TEM sega, Lormont, France) with 2.7 vol% sevoflurane for 45 min and allowed to wake up for a 1-h wash out period before anesthesia for surgery (fig. 1). In both groups, after the trachea was intubated and the lungs ventilated mechanically with 3.0 vol% sevoflurane in a gas mixture of 30% oxygen and 70% nitrogen, focal cerebral ischemia was produced according to the technique of Longa et al.15 by occlusion of the right middle cerebral artery with slight modifications. Briefly, a middle line incision was made on the ventral side of the neck, the right common carotid artery was exposed, and the vagus and sympathetic nerves were carefully separated from the artery. The superior and inferior thyroid arteries were coagulated, and the external carotid artery was permanently ligated 2 mm distal to the bifurcation of the common carotid artery. The internal and common carotid arteries were temporarily clamped. A 0.38-mm diameter nylon monofilament (Nacrita 20 μm; La Tortue, La Soie, Boulogne Billancourt, France) previously coated with silicone was inserted into the external carotid artery and advanced via the internal carotid artery up to the origin of the middle cerebral artery, to a distance of 18–20 mm from the carotid artery bifurcation until slight resistance was felt. The pterygopalatine artery was permanently ligated. At the end of surgery, the surgical wounds were closed and infiltrated with 0.5% bupivacaine, anesthesia was discontinued, and animals were allowed to awaken in a heated chamber. After a 60-min ischemic interval, the filament was withdrawn, allowing reperfusion. During preconditioning and surgery, inspired and expired fraction of sevoflurane, oxygen, and carbon dioxide were continuously monitored (Capnomac Ultima; Datex-Ohmeda, Helsinki, Finland). The tail artery was catheterized to monitor mean arterial pressure (M1166A; Helwett-Packard, Evry, France). Plasma glucose concentration (Accu-chek Sensor; Roche Diagnostic, Meylan, France), blood gases and acid-base status (ABL5; Radiometer Copenhagen, Neuilly-Plaisance, France) were assessed at three timepoints; before surgery, at the beginning of ischemia, and at the onset of reperfusion. Temperature sensors were inserted into the rectum and between the right temporal muscle and temporal bone (Mon-a-therm, subcutaneous sensor; Mallinckrodt, Tyco, Plaisir, France). Pericranial temperature was maintained constant at 37.5°C using a servo-controlled heating blanket (Harvard Apparatus®, Les Ulis, France). Adequacy of middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) and reperfusion was confirmed by laser Doppler flowmetry (PF5010; Perimed, Stockholm, Sweden) using a flexible optical fiber probe (probe 418; Perimed) attached to the skull over the ipsilateral parietal cortex (6-mm lateral and 1-mm posterior of bregma). The surgical procedure was considered technically adequate if regional cerebral blood flow decreased more than 70% after placement of the intraluminal filament and if a cerebral blood flow signal was rapidly restored during reperfusion.
Back to Top | Article Outline
Measurement of Neurologic Outcome
Neurologic deficits were evaluated at 3, 7, and 14 days after MCAO by an investigator blinded to the treatment conditions and using the modified Neurologic Severity Score graded on a scale of 0 to 18 (normal score, 0; maximal deficit score, 18).16
Back to Top | Article Outline
Tissue Preparation
Animals were randomly assigned to one of four different postischemic observation periods of 1, 3, 7, and 14 days after MCAO. At the end of the observation period, animals were anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital (Clin Midy, Paris, France) and transcardially perfused with 4% paraformaldehyde (Sigma, Saint-Quentin Fallavier, France) in 0.1 m phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). After decapitation, the brain was carefully removed from the skull and postfixed for 24 h in 4% phosphate-buffered paraformaldehyde at 4°C. Brains were successively cryopreserved in sucrose 10% and 30% for 6 and 72 h, respectively, snap-frozen, and stored at −80°C.
Back to Top | Article Outline
Infarct Volume Assessment
Detection of infarct tissue was performed on 20 consecutive sections cut into 40-μm-thick coronal sections at 400-μm intervals (from olfactory bulb to cerebellum) using cresyl violet staining (Nissl staining). Tissue sections were fixed in a formol-acetic acid-methanol mixture for 10 min and washed twice in water. Sections were stained for 2 min in filtered 0.5% cresyl violet (Sigma-Aldrich) solution in 20% ethanol and then rinsed in distilled water. They were then washed and dehydrated in graded ethanol solutions (70%, 95%, 100%) for 1 min each and coverslipped. Infarction volume was measured from 20 consecutive Nissl-stained sections scanned using a flatbed scanner, and the images were digitally stored in the tagged image file format. The infarct areas were measured using SigmaScan Pro 5.0 software (SPSS Inc, San Rafael, CA). Infarct volume was calculated by multiplying the infarct area of each slice by the distance (400 μm) between successive slices. To eliminate the contribution of postischemic edema to the volume of injury, values were corrected for swelling according to the method of Lin et al.17
Back to Top | Article Outline
Detection of Apoptotic Cells
Apopototic cells were detected by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase–mediated 2′-deoxyuridine 5′-triphosphate nick-end labeling (TUNEL) and cleaved caspase-3 labeling on sections cut into 6-μm-thick coronal sections approximately 1.3 mm rostral to the bregma. DNA fragmentation labeling was performed with In Situ Cell Death Kit, POD (Roche, Manheim, Germany). Briefly, endogenous peroxidase activity was quenched with 3% H2O2, and brain sections were permeabilized with 0.3% Triton X-100 and 0.1% sodium citrate (pH 6.0; Sigma-Aldrich) at 4°C. Sections were incubated for 90 min with terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase and then for 30 min at 37°C with peroxidase-conjugated antifluorescein antibody. After rinsing, immunocomplexes were visualized by exposure to H2O2 and diaminobenzidine (Sigma-Aldrich). Positive (DNaseI pretreatment, Sigma-Aldrich) and negative (terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase incubation omitted) controls were used to check efficiency of immunostaining. Only cells containing apoptotic bodies are referred to as apoptotic cells.18 Cleaved caspase-3 labeling was performed using primary rabbit anti–cleaved caspase-3 (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA). In brief, sections were permeabilized with 0.3% Triton X-100 and 0.1% sodium citrate (pH 6.0; Sigma-Aldrich) at 4°C, and nonspecific binding activity was blocked by 10% goat serum (Sigma-Aldrich) for 1 h. Sections were then incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibody diluted to 1:100. After rinsing, sections were incubated with Alexa Fluor 546, goat anti-rabbit IgG (Molecular Probes, Interchim, Montluçon, France) diluted to 1:500 for 1 h at room temperature. Sections were then rinsed and mounted. TUNEL and cleaved caspase-3–positive cell numbers were counted in five to ten fields in the inner boundary zone (defined as a part of the penumbra directly in contact with ischemic core)19 at high-power microscopic magnification (×400) and expressed as number of positive cells per square millimeter section.
Back to Top | Article Outline
Statistical Analyses
Values were reported as mean ± SD unless otherwise indicated. Physiologic variables were analyzed by repeated-measures analysis of variance. Cerebral infarct volumes, TUNEL, and cleaved caspase-3–positive cell density were compared with unpaired t tests with Bonferroni corrections for post hoc intergroup comparisons. Neurologic scores were analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis test. The same test was used for the comparison of time periods, which were considered independent groups because the animals were tested only once. For between-groups comparison, this was followed by the Mann–Whitney U test with Bonferroni correction. Statistical analyses were performed with SigmaStat® 2.03, (SPSS Inc). A value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Back to Top | Article Outline

Results

Table 1
Table 1
Image Tools
Of 89 animals instrumented, 7 died (4 controls, 3 preconditioned) before infarct volume determination and were excluded from the analysis. Physiologic variables before, during, and after MCAO are summarized in table 1. There were no significant differences in mean arterial pressure, pH, Pco2, Po2, and hemoglobin concentration between the control and sevoflurane-preconditioned groups at each timepoint. There were no differences among groups assigned to different postischemic observation periods (data not shown). Therefore, these parameters are presented together for each treatment. Plasma glucose concentration was significantly higher in the sevoflurane-preconditioned group during MCAO. Mean duration of 3.0 vol% sevoflurane exposure during surgery for control and preconditioned group was 35.5 ± 10.4 and 34.3 ± 8.2 min, respectively.
Back to Top | Article Outline
Neurologic Assessment
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Image Tools
Results of the modified Neurologic Severity Score test are reported in figure 2. Three days after ischemia, neurologic scores were significantly lower in the sevoflurane-preconditioned group compared to the control group (median [interquartile range], 5 [3–6.5] vs. 6 [5.5–9.5]; n = 16 per group; P = 0.003). After 7- and 14-day recovery periods, there were no significant differences in neurologic scores between groups. In both groups, a significant improvement in neurologic scores was observed (P < 0.05 for time periods).
Back to Top | Article Outline
Histologic Analysis
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Image Tools
The values of infarct volume in the control and the sevoflurane-preconditioned group are presented in figure 3. Sevoflurane preconditioning significantly reduced infarct volume at day 3 compared to the control group (109 ± 43 mm3vs. 148 ± 56 mm3; control group: n = 14, preconditioned group: n = 16; P = 0.042). At 7 and 14 days after ischemia, there were no significant differences in infarct volumes between groups.
Back to Top | Article Outline
Apoptosis Detection
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Image Tools
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Image Tools
Figures 4 and 5, respectively, show TUNEL (n = 6 per day and group) and cleaved caspase-3 (n = 8 per day and group) staining within the inner boundary zone of the evolving infarct. Compared to the contralateral hemisphere, the number of apoptotic cells increased at day 1, peaked at day 3, and persisted at day 14 after MCAO. The number of apoptotic cells was significantly lower in the sevoflurane-preconditioned group than in the control group 3 days (TUNEL-positive cells/mm2: 78.3 ± 48.9 vs. 131.4 ± 43.5, P = 0.038; cleaved caspase-3–positive cells/mm2: 22.7 ± 12.6 vs. 52.6 ± 30.1, P = 0.018) and 7 days (TUNEL-positive cells/mm2: 15.6 ± 16.8 vs. 63.8 ± 51.9, P = 0.030; cleaved caspase-3–positive cells/mm2: 21.0 ± 10.2 vs. 40.5 ± 6.5, P = 0.004) after ischemia. At day 14, the number of TUNEL-positive and cleaved caspase-3–positive cells was not significantly different between groups. Neither TUNEL nor cleaved caspase-3 staining were detected in the contralateral nonischemic hemisphere.
Back to Top | Article Outline

Discussion

This study uses an in vivo model of transient focal cerebral ischemia in rats to demonstrate that preconditioning with sevoflurane induces effective but transient neuroprotective effects in terms of neurologic scores and infarct volumes. Sevoflurane preconditioning also decreased ischemia-induced apoptosis. This antiapoptotic effect was observed up to 7 days after injury.
We used 2.7–3.0 vol% sevoflurane. One minimal alveolar concentration of sevoflurane is 2.3 vol% in adult rats.20 Therefore, the sevoflurane concentration used in this study was relevant.
Sevoflurane preconditioning afforded transient neuroprotection against focal cerebral ischemia in rats as assessed by neurologic scores and infarct volumes. This neuroprotection was effective on day 3, disappearing 7 and 14 days after ischemia. Investigators have recently begun examining whether sevoflurane-induced protection can occur through preconditioning before ischemic brain injury. In in vitro models, sevoflurane preconditioning of rat hippocampal slices 15 min before hypoxia and reoxygenation increased recovery of neuronal function 24 h after hypoxia in a dose-dependent manner.5In vivo, Payne et al.12 showed that sevoflurane-induced preconditioning against global cerebral ischemia reduced neuronal damage in rats 7 days after injury, but they did not evaluate this neuroprotection at remote timepoints. Some studies of APC on focal cerebral ischemia7,8,10,11,21 demonstrated APC-induced neuroprotection, but they assessed neurologic injury only 24 to 96 h after ischemia and did not evaluate the long-term effect of preconditioning. Other studies of APC against hypoxia/ ischemia in neonatal rats demonstrated long-term neuroprotection.9,14 However, neonatal hypoxia/ischemia induced slowly progressive brain damage mainly related to apoptotic mechanisms,22 whereas short-term necrotic cell death predominates after MCAO. It is therefore difficult to compare the protection afforded by APC between these two models. Volatile anesthetic-induced direct neuroprotection has been demonstrated when drugs were administered during the ischemic injury in vivo23–25 and in vitro.2,26 Results varied depending on the severity of injury. During incomplete cerebral ischemia23 or mild focal ischemic injury induced by transient MCAO without permanent ligation of the common carotid artery,2 volatile anesthetics provided 4 to 8 weeks of protection. Conversely, during severe ischemic injury, as described by Kawaguchi et al.13,27 after transient MCAO with permanent ligation of the common carotid artery in rats, isoflurane reduced cerebral infarction rates at 2 and 4 days, but not 7 and 14 days, after ischemia. In a similar way, these authors reported a sevoflurane-induced improvement in neurologic outcome 2 days after MCAO, which disappeared 14 days after ischemia.27
It seems that this preconditioning effect is a shared feature among volatile anesthetics and may be mediated by common and interdigitated pathways activated by volatile anesthetics.28 Possible candidate pathways have been reviewed at the myocardial29 and cerebral3,30 level. For example, activation of adenosine A1 receptors31 and adenosine triphosphate–sensitive potassium channels,32 through reactive oxygen species generation,33 have been involved in myocardium and brain preconditioning by isoflurane7,21 as well as by sevoflurane.5,34 Recently, brain Akt activation, which controls the balance between survival and death signaling, has also been involved in APC.30 These molecular mechanisms may, at least in part, explain that inhibition of ischemia-induced apoptosis also appears to play an important role in APC at the level of the myocardium35 and the brain.14,36–37 In this study, we present a timecourse for the antiapoptotic effect of sevoflurane preconditioning against cerebral ischemia. In the control group, apoptotic cells assessed by TUNEL and cleaved caspase-3 staining were observed from 1 to 14 days after MCAO and peaked 3 days after MCAO. Similar apoptosis timecourse results obtained with the same MCAO model were reported by Xu et al.38 We show that sevoflurane preconditioning induced a decrease in the number of apoptotic cells 3 days after ischemia that extended for 7 days after ischemia. Very few studies have produced evidence that APC can induce protection against ischemia-induced apoptosis. Wise-Faberowski et al.39 showed in vitro that isoflurane preconditioning of rat neuronal cell cultures subjected to oxygen glucose deprivation led to a concentration-dependent reduction of oxygen glucose deprivation-induced neuronal apoptosis. In vivo, antiapoptotic effects of APC in the brain have been reported, either after permanent MCAO or on neonatal hypoxia/ischemia models, that an increase in the anti-apoptotic B-cell lymphoma-2 expression blocked cytochrome c release from mitochondria.14,36 These authors moreover proposed a link between this increase in B-cell lymphoma-2 and an APC-induced activation of P38 mitogen-activated protein kinases. The in vivo effects of volatile anesthetics on ischemia-induced apoptosis were also studied when drugs were administered during ischemic injury and not before. Contradictory results were reported depending on severity of injury. During mild ischemic injury, volatile anesthetics induced a sustained decrease in key apoptotic protein expression,23 whereas these drugs delayed but did not prevent ischemia-induced apoptosis during severe ischemic injury13 and had to be administrated with caspase inhibitors to obtain a sustained improvement of neurologic outcome.39–40 Our results showed that sevoflurane-induced reduction in cerebral apoptosis was sustained longer than improvement in functional outcome. The discrepancy between functional outcome and apoptosis assessment may be related to a weakness in the neurologic scores, which did not allow subtle differentiation of impairment severity. It may also be due to a rapid recovery of neurologic function in rats, with no rat having a score above 10 after day 3. There are several limitations in this study. First, the study was limited to 14 days after ischemia. As suggested by Sakai et al.2 longer periods of time may be necessary to assess the permanent neuroprotective effect of anesthetics. However, maintaining rats alive for such a long period of time after cerebral ischemia is not feasible in every laboratory and requires special skills and methods. This is clearly a subject for another specifically designed study. Second, the optimal dose and time lapse between administration of sevoflurane and ischemia to maximize neuroprotection are not clearly established, varying widely in the literature. We chose 45-min administration of approximately 1.2 minimum alveolar concentration sevoflurane for 1 h before the surgical procedure. A longer interval between preconditioning and ischemia might enhance neuroprotection through long-lasting changes in gene expression41 or protein kinase activity.8 In the study by Kapinya et al.10 the interval between APC and ischemia up to 24 h did not change the neuroprotective effect. A larger dose of sevoflurane might provide better neuroprotection, but in one study with isoflurane, minimum alveolar concentration values less than 1.5 provided better neurologic outcomes than higher concentrations.42 Third, intraischemic plasma glucose concentrations were higher in sevoflurane-preconditioned rats than in control animals. This may represent a confounding variable because hyperglycemia may worsen the outcome from cerebral ischemia.43 Nevertheless, sevoflurane-preconditioned rats showed less cerebral necrosis and apoptosis. It is therefore unlikely that differences in plasma glucose concentration contributed to differences in outcome between the two groups. Finally, the control condition we chose here (anesthesia with sevoflurane during the surgical procedure) requires explanation. It seems likely that sevoflurane administration during the surgical preparation may have an impact on neurologic outcome. Indeed, in a study of sevoflurane preconditioning, we would have used an intravenous anesthetic for surgical preparation, except that this would be somewhat artificial in our opinion, because inhalational anesthesia is the most common anesthetic technique used in humans, and our study design reflects clinical practice. Moreover, most of the intravenous anesthetics also have an impact on neurologic outcome44; no matter which anesthetic had been used for surgery, the same criticism could have been formulated.
In conclusion, this study used an in vivo model of transient focal cerebral ischemia in rats to demonstrate that sevoflurane preconditioning induced effective but transient neuroprotective effects compared to sevoflurane administered immediately before ischemia. Sevoflurane preconditioning also decreased ischemia-induced apoptosis up to 7 days after the ischemic insult. Additional work is needed to evaluate the role of apoptosis reduction in APC and to search for the mechanisms associated with this effect. Clinically, there is much interest in determining the feasibility of anesthetic preconditioning of the brain before exposure to ischemic or mechanical injury from surgery or other interventional procedures and its impact on neurologic complications like perioperative stroke. It seems likely that this kind of neuroprotection cannot be achieved by a single agent but more probably by multiple approaches targeting different mechanisms. In light of this, sevoflurane preconditioning may offer a time window to limit the extent of cerebral damage, but future research is needed that compares the long-term histologic and functional consequences of a multi-targeting preconditioning approach.
Back to Top | Article Outline

References

1. Canas P, Velly L, Labrande C, Guillet B, Sautou-Miranda V, Masmejean F, Nieoullon A, Gouin F, Bruder N, Pisano P: Sevoflurane protects rat mixed cerebrocortical neuronal-glial cell cultures against transient oxygen-glucose deprivation: Involvement of glutamate uptake and reactive oxygen species. Anesthesiology 2006; 105:990–8

2. Sakai H, Sheng H, Yates RB, Ishida K, Pearlstein RD, Warner DS: Isoflurane provides long-term protection against focal cerebral ischemia in the rat. Anesthesiology 2007; 106:92–9

3. Kitano H, Kirsch JR, Hurn PD, Murphy SJ: Inhalational anesthetics as neuroprotectants or chemical preconditioning agents in ischemic brain. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2007; 27:1108–28

4. Kersten JR, Orth KG, Pagel PS, Mei DA, Gross GJ, Warltier DC: Role of adenosine in isoflurane-induced cardioprotection. Anesthesiology 1997; 86:1128–39

5. Kehl F, Payne RS, Roewer N, Schurr A: Sevoflurane-induced preconditioning of rat brain in vitro and the role of KATP channels. Brain Res 2004; 1021:76–81

6. Wang J, Lei B, Popp S, Meng F, Cottrell JE, Kass IS: Sevoflurane immediate preconditioning alters hypoxic membrane potential changes in rat hippocampal slices and improves recovery of CA1 pyramidal cells after hypoxia and global cerebral ischemia. Neuroscience 2007; 145:1097–107

7. Liu Y, Xiong L, Chen S, Wang Q: Isoflurane tolerance against focal cerebral ischemia is attenuated by adenosine A1 receptor antagonists. Can J Anaesth 2006; 53:194–201

8. Zheng S, Zuo Z: Isoflurane preconditioning induces neuroprotection against ischemia via activation of P38 mitogen-activated protein kinases. Mol Pharmacol 2004; 65:1172–80

9. Zhao P, Zuo Z: Isoflurane preconditioning induces neuroprotection that is inducible nitric oxide synthase-dependent in neonatal rats. Anesthesiology 2004; 101:695–703

10. Kapinya KJ, Prass K, Dirnagl U: Isoflurane induced prolonged protection against cerebral ischemia in mice: A redox sensitive mechanism? Neuroreport 2002; 13:1431–5

11. Kapinya KJ, Löwl D, Fütterer C, Maurer M, Waschke KF, Isaev NK, Dirnagl U: Tolerance against ischemic neuronal injury can be induced by volatile anesthetics and is inducible NO synthase dependent. Stroke 2002; 33:1889–98

12. Payne RS, Akca O, Roewer N, Schurr A, Kehl F: Sevoflurane-induced preconditioning protects against cerebral ischemic neuronal damage in rats. Brain Res 2005; 1034:147–52

13. Kawaguchi M, Drummond JC, Cole DJ, Kelly PJ, Spurlock MP, Patel PM: Effect of isoflurane on neuronal apoptosis in rats subjected to focal cerebral ischemia. Anesth Analg 2004; 98:798–805

14. Zhao P, Peng L, Li L, Xu X, Zuo Z: Isoflurane preconditioning improves long-term neurologic outcome after hypoxic-ischemic brain injury in neonatal rats. Anesthesiology 2007; 107:963–70

15. Longa EZ, Weinstein PR, Carlson S, Cummins R: Reversible middle cerebral artery occlusion without craniectomy in rats. Stroke 1989; 20:84–91

16. Chen J, Li Y, Wang L, Zhang Z, Lu D, Lu M, Chopp M: Therapeutic benefit of intravenous administration of bone marrow stromal cells after cerebral ischemia in rats. Stroke 2001; 32:1005–11

17. Lin TN, He YY, Wu G, Khan M, Hsu CY: Effect of brain edema on infarct volume in a focal cerebral ischemia model in rats. Stroke 1993; 24:117–21

18. Gavrieli Y, Sherman Y, Ben-Sasson SA: Identification of programmed cell death in situvia specific labeling of nuclear DNA fragmentation. J Cell Biol 1992; 119:493–501

19. Li Y, Powers C, Jiang N, Chopp M: Intact, injured, necrotic and apoptotic cells after focal cerebral ischemia in the rat. J Neurol Sci 1998; 156:119–32

20. Orliaguet G, Vivien B, Langeron O, Bouhemad B, Coriat P, Riou B: Minimum alveolar concentration of volatile anesthetics in rats during postnatal maturation. Anesthesiology 2001; 95:734–9

21. Xiong L, Zheng Y, Wu M, Hou L, Zhu Z, Zhang X, Lu Z: Preconditioning with isoflurane produces dose-dependent neuroprotection via activation of adenosine triphosphate-regulated potassium channels after focal cerebral ischemia in rats. Anesth Analg 2003; 96:233–7

22. Pulera MR, Adams LM, Liu H, Santos DG, Nishimura RN, Yang F, Cole GM, Wasterlain CG: Apoptosis in a neonatal rat model of cerebral hypoxia-ischemia. Stroke 1998; 29:2622–30

23. Pape M, Engelhard K, Eberspächer E, Hollweck R, Kellermann K, Zintner S, Hutzler P, Werner C: The long-term effect of sevoflurane on neuronal cell damage and expression of apoptotic factors after cerebral ischemia and reperfusion in rats. Anesth Analg 2006; 103:173–9

24. Warner DS, McFarlane C, Todd MM, Ludwig P, McAllister AM: Sevoflurane and halothane reduce focal ischemic brain damage in the rat. Possible influence on thermoregulation. Anesthesiology 1993; 79:985–92

25. Werner C, Möllenberg O, Kochs E, Schulte am Esch J: Sevoflurane improves neurological outcome after incomplete cerebral ischaemia in rats. Br J Anaesth 1995;75:756–60

26. Toner CC, Connelly K, Whelpton R, Bains S, Michael-Titus AT, McLaughlin DP, Stamford JA: Effects of sevoflurane on dopamine, glutamate and aspartate release in an in vitro model of cerebral ischaemia. Br J Anaesth 2001; 86:550–4

27. Kawaguchi M, Kimbro JR, Drummond JC, Cole DJ, Kelly PJ, Patel PM: Isoflurane delays but does not prevent cerebral infarction in rats subjected to focal ischemia. Anesthesiology 2000; 92:1335–42

28. Wang C, Jin Lee J, Jung HH, Zuo Z: Pretreatment with volatile anesthetics, but not with the nonimmobilizer 1,2-dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane, reduced cell injury in rat cerebellar slices after an in vitro simulated ischemia. Brain Res 2007; 1152:201–8

29. Zaugg M, Lucchinetti E, Uecker M, Pasch T, Schaub MC: Anaesthetics and cardiac preconditioning. Part I, Signalling and cytoprotective mechanisms. Br J Anaesth 2003; 91:551–65

30. Wang L, Traystman RJ, Murphy SJ: Inhalational anesthetics as preconditioning agents in ischemic brain. Curr Opin Pharmacol 2008; 8:104–10

31. Ismaeil MS, Tkachenko I, Gamperl AK, Hickey RF, Cason BA: Mechanisms of isoflurane-induced myocardial preconditioning in rabbits. Anesthesiology 1999; 90:812–21

32. Uecker M, Da Silva R, Grampp T, Pasch T, Schaub MC, Zaugg M: Translocation of protein kinase C isoforms to subcellular targets in ischemic and anesthetic preconditioning. Anesthesiology 2003; 99:138–47

33. Novalija E, Varadarajan SG, Camara AK, An J, Chen Q, Riess ML, Hogg N, Stowe DF: Anesthetic preconditioning: Triggering role of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species in isolated hearts. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2002; 283:H44–52

34. Velly L, Canas P, Guillet B, Labrande C, Masmejean F, Nieoullon A, Gouin F, Bruder N, Pisano P: Early anesthetic preconditioning in mixed cortical neuronal-glial cell cultures subjected to oxygen-glucose deprivation: The role of adenosine triphosphate dependent potassium channels and reactive oxygen species in sevoflurane-induced neuroprotection. Anesth Analg 2009; 108:955–63

35. Raphael J, Abedat S, Rivo J, Meir K, Beeri R, Pugatsch T, Zuo Z, Gozal Y: Volatile anesthetic preconditioning attenuates myocardial apoptosis in rabbits after regional ischemia and reperfusion via Akt signaling and modulation of Bcl-2 family proteins. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2006; 318:186–94

36. Li QF, Zhu YS, Jiang H: Isoflurane preconditioning activates HIF-1alpha, iNOS and Erk1/2 and protects against oxygen-glucose deprivation neuronal injury. Brain Res 2008; 1245:26–35

37. Wise-Faberowski L, Raizada MK, Sumners C: Oxygen and glucose deprivation-induced neuronal apoptosis is attenuated by halothane and isoflurane. Anesth Analg 2001; 93:1281–7

38. Xu XH, Zhang SM, Yan WM, Li XR, Zhang HY, Zheng XX: Development of cerebral infarction, apoptotic cell death and expression of X-chromosome-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein following focal cerebral ischemia in rats. Life Sci 2006; 78:704–12

39. Inoue S, Drummond JC, Davis DP, Cole DJ, Patel PM: Combination of isoflurane and caspase inhibition reduces cerebral injury in rats subjected to focal cerebral ischemia. Anesthesiology 2004; 101:75–81

40. Inoue S, Davis DP, Drummond JC, Cole DJ, Patel PM: The combination of isoflurane and caspase 8 inhibition results in sustained neuroprotection in rats subject to focal cerebral ischemia. Anesth Analg 2006; 102:1548–55

41. Marota JJ, Crosby G, Uhl GR: Selective effects of pentobarbital and halothane on c-fos and jun-B gene expression in rat brain. Anesthesiology 1992; 77:365–71

42. Nasu I, Yokoo N, Takaoka S, Takata K, Hoshikawa T, Okada M, Miura Y: The dose-dependent effects of isoflurane on outcome from severe forebrain ischemia in the rat. Anesth Analg 2006; 103:413–8

43. Martín A, Rojas S, Chamorro A, Falcón C, Bargalló N, Planas AM: Why does acute hyperglycemia worsen the outcome of transient focal cerebral ischemia? Role of corticosteroids, inflammation, and protein O-glycosylation. Stroke 2006; 37:1288–9

44. Fukuda S, Warner DS: Cerebral protection. Br J Anaesth 2007; 99:10–7

Cited By:

This article has been cited 8 time(s).

Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
Preconditioning with Inhalative Carbon Monoxide Protects Rat Retinal Ganglion Cells from Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury
Biermann, J; Lagreze, WA; Dimitriu, C; Stoykow, C; Goebel, U
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 51(7): 3784-3791.
10.1167/iovs.09-4894
CrossRef
Cns & Neurological Disorders-Drug Targets
miR-15b Suppression of Bcl-2 Contributes to Cerebral Ischemic Injury and is Reversed by Sevoflurane Preconditioning
Shi, H; Sun, BL; Zhang, J; Lu, SD; Zhang, PY; Wang, HL; Yu, Q; Stetler, RA; Vosler, PS; Chen, J; Gao, YQ
Cns & Neurological Disorders-Drug Targets, 12(3): 381-391.

Neural Regeneration Research
Is longer sevoflurane preconditioning neuroprotective in permanent focal cerebral ischemia?
Qiu, CW; Sheng, B; Wang, SR; Liu, J
Neural Regeneration Research, 8(): 2126-2133.
10.3969/j.issn.1673-5374.2013.23.002
CrossRef
Translational Stroke Research
Should the STAIR Criteria Be Modified for Preconditioning Studies?
Wang, MM; Xi, GH; Keep, RF
Translational Stroke Research, 4(1): 3-14.
10.1007/s12975-012-0219-0
CrossRef
International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience
Preconditioning with sevoflurane ameliorates spatial learning and memory deficit after focal cerebral ischemia-reperfusion in rats
Hu, XW; Zhang, Y; Li, WY; Liu, J; Li, Y
International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience, 31(5): 328-333.
10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2013.04.004
CrossRef
Journal of Translational Medicine
Effects of sevoflurane postconditioning on cell death, inflammation and TLR expression in human endothelial cells exposed to LPS
Rodriguez-Gonzalez, R; Baluja, A; Del Rio, SV; Rodriguez, A; Rodriguez, J; Taboada, M; Brea, D; Alvarez, J
Journal of Translational Medicine, 11(): -.
ARTN 87
CrossRef
European Journal of Anaesthesiology (EJA)
Recent advances in pharmacologic neuroprotection
Mantz, J; Degos, V; Laigle, C
European Journal of Anaesthesiology (EJA), 27(1): 6-10.
10.1097/EJA.0b013e32832fa606
PDF (317) | CrossRef
Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology
Neuroanesthesiology Update
Pasternak, JJ; Lanier, WL
Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology, 22(2): 86-109.
10.1097/ANA.0b013e3181d2ef96
PDF (341) | CrossRef
Back to Top | Article Outline

© 2009 American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc.

Publication of an advertisement in Anesthesiology Online does not constitute endorsement by the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc. or Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. of the product or service being advertised.
Login

Article Tools

Images

Share