Skip Navigation LinksHome > February 2009 - Volume 110 - Issue 2 > Increasing Operating Room Throughput via Parallel Processing...
doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181947ba7

Increasing Operating Room Throughput via Parallel Processing May Not Require Extra Resources

Abouleish, Amr M.D.

Free Access
Article Outline
Collapse Box

Author Information

Back to Top | Article Outline

In Reply:—

I thank Harders et al. for the comments and pointing out that some of the traditional efforts to improve operating room throughput can be considered to be “parallel processing.”1 As noted by Harders et al., improving individual functions and improving teamwork has always been essential to improving productivity independent from the actual industry or product, including the operating room.2 In contrast, the editorial3 and accompanying article4 is focused on redesigning the larger process that goes beyond improving individual productivity and teamwork.
Amr Abouleish, M.D.
University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas.
Back to Top | Article Outline


1. Overdyk FJ, Harvey S, Fishman R, Shippey F: Successful strategies for improving operating room efficiency at academic institutions. Anesth Analg 1998; 86:896–906

2. Cendan JC, Good M: Interdisciplinary work flow assessment and redesign decreases operating room turnover time and allows for additional caseload. Archives of Surgery 2006; 141:65–9

3. Abouleish AE: Increasing Operating Room Throughput: Just Buzzwords for This Decade? Anesthesiology 2008; 109:3–4

4. Smith MP, Sandberg WS, Foss J, Massoli K, Kanda M, Barsoum W, Schubert A: High-throughput operating room system for joint arthroplasties durably outperforms routine processes. Anesthesiology 2008; 109:25–35

© 2009 American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc.

Publication of an advertisement in Anesthesiology Online does not constitute endorsement by the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc. or Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. of the product or service being advertised.

Article Tools