Dexmedetomidine Reduces Long-term Potentiation in Mouse Hippocampus
Takamatsu, Isao M.D., Ph.D.*; Iwase, Ayano M.D.†; Ozaki, Makoto M.D., Ph.D.‡; Kazama, Tomiei M.D., Ph.D.§; Wada, Keiji M.D., Ph.D.∥; Sekiguchi, Masayuki Ph.D.#
Background: Dexmedetomidine (Precedex; Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL) is a selective α2-adrenergic agonist that also has affinity for imidazoline receptors. In clinical studies, dexmedetomidine has sedative effects and impairs memory, but the action of dexmedetomidine on synaptic plasticity in the brain has yet to be established. In the present study, the authors investigated the effects of dexmedetomidine on two forms of synaptic plasticity—long-term potentiation (LTP) and paired-pulse facilitation—in the CA1 region of mouse hippocampal slices.
Methods: The authors recorded Schaffer collateral-evoked field excitatory postsynaptic potentials from mouse hippocampal slices in CA1 stratum radiatum. The slope of the rising phase of the field excitatory postsynaptic potential was used to estimate the strength of synaptic transmission.
Results: Application of dexmedetomidine for 20 min before “theta burst” stimulation dose-dependently attenuated LTP, and half-inhibitory concentration of dexmedetomidine was 28.6 ± 5.7 nm. The inhibitory effect of dexmedetomidine on LTP was not abolished by an α2-adrenoceptor antagonist (yohimbine), an imidazoline type 1 receptor and α2-adrenoceptor antagonist (efaroxan), an α1-adrenoceptor antagonist (prazosin), or a γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptor antagonist (picrotoxin). However, an imidazoline type 2 receptor and α2-adrenoceptor antagonist (idazoxan) completely blocked the dexmedetomidine-induced attenuation. Furthermore, 2-benzofuranyl-2-imidaloline, a selective imidazoline type 2 receptor ligand, reduced LTP. 2-(4,5-dihydroimidaz-2-yl)-quinoline, another imidazoline type 2 receptor ligand, abolished the 2-benzofuranyl-2-imidaloline-induced attenuation, but the inhibitory effect of dexmedetomidine on LTP was not abolished by 2-(4,5-dihydroimidaz-2-yl)-quinoline. Dexmedetomidine did not affect paired-pulse facilitation.
Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine impairs LTP in area CA1 of the mouse hippocampus via imidazoline type 2 receptors and α2-adrenoceptors.
DEXMEDETOMIDINE is a highly selective α2-adrenergic agonist (binding affinity for α2:α1 = 1620:1, Ki = 1.08 nm, as measured by displacement of [3
with both sedative and analgesic effects. Dexmedetomidine-induced sedation is accompanied by little respiratory depression and is easily reversed with verbal or physical stimuli. Therefore, dexmedetomidine is used clinically in intensive care units to sedate intubated patients. In rats, α2-adrenoceptor activation impairs spatial navigation in a water maze,2
whereas blocking these receptors facilitates learning and memory.3,4
Activity-dependent synaptic plasticity is considered a cellular mechanism for learning and memory.5
Whereas α2-adrenoceptor activation can reduce noradrenergic synaptic transmission and block synaptic plasticity at glutamatergic synapses of the basolateral amygdala,6
the role of α2-adrenoceptors in hippocampal synaptic plasticity has not been well studied.7
The three subtypes of α2-adrenoceptors in the brain are α2A/D
, and α2C
are densely expressed in the hippocampus9
where they inhibit noradrenaline release.10
Because it was suggested that endogenous noradrenaline release is required for maintenance of hippocampal CA1 long-term potentiation (LTP),11
presynaptic inhibition of noradrenaline release by dexmedetomidine may impair hippocampal LTP. However, this hypothesis has yet to be tested directly.
Dexmedetomidine has an imidazoline structure and affinity for imidazoline receptors.12,13
Three subtypes of imidazoline receptors are expressed in the brain, namely imidazoline type 1, type 2, and nontype 1/type 2 (subtype 3). [3
H]idazoxan binding, which reveals imidazoline type 2 receptors, is densely distributed in the brain—both in neurons and glial cells14,15
and in the hippocampus including the CA1 field16
; however, it is unclear whether these receptors modulate synaptic transmission in the hippocampus.
In the present study, we investigated the effects of dexmedetomidine on synaptic transmission and plasticity in the CA1 field of mouse hippocampal slices. Dexmedetomidine attenuated LTP induced by θ-burst stimulation (TBS) through activation of α2-adrenoceptors and imidazoline type 2 receptors.
Materials and Methods
Hippocampal Slice Preparation and Electrophysiological Recording
All experiments were performed in strict accordance with the regulations of the National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry for animal experiments. Hippocampal slices were prepared from 20- to 30-d-old male C57BL/6J mice as reported.17,18
Briefly, animals were decapitated under halothane anesthesia, and the hippocampus was rapidly removed. Transverse slices (400 μm thick) were cut using a Vibratome 3000 (Vibratome, St. Louis, MO) in cold (2.5°C) sucrose Ringer’s solution containing (in mm): 234 sucrose, 26 NaHCO3
, 2.5 KCl, 0.5 CaCl2
, 1.25 NaH2
, 10 MgSO4
, and 11 glucose (pH 7.3-7.4), oxygenated with 95% O2
. The slices were incubated in artificial cerebrospinal fluid (ACSF) containing (in mM): 26 NaHCO3
, 124 NaCl, 3.0 KCl, 2.0 CaCl2
, 1.2 KH2
, 1.3 MgHPO4
O, and 10 glucose (pH 7.3–7.4) at room temperature for at least 90 min before use. During this incubation, halothane used for anesthesia in our experiments would be washed out in incubation media, ACSF. Therefore, although volatile anesthetics have suppressive effects on LTP in the hippocampus,19
the influence of halothane was expected to be minimal in our study. A single slice was transferred to the recording chamber and perfused with ACSF at a rate of 2-3 ml/min (30 ± 2°C). ACSF was continuously bubbled with 95% O2
. Field excitatory postsynaptic potentials (fEPSPs) were recorded from stratum radiatum of the hippocampal area CA1 using a glass micropipette (1–2 MΩ) filled with ACSF. Electrical signals were amplified using a MultiClamp 700B amplifier (Axon Instruments, Union City, CA), filtered at 10 kHz, digitized at 10 kHz, and acquired with Clampex software (version 9.2, Axon Instruments). A bipolar stainless steel stimulating electrode was placed in the stratum radiatum to stimulate the Schaffer collateral pathway. In all experiments, stimulus intensity was adjusted to produce a fEPSP that was 40–50% of the maximal amplitude. The duration of the stimulus was 0.10–0.15 ms. fEPSPs for which the 40–50% amplitude was >1 mV were used for data analysis. The strength of synaptic transmission was determined by measuring the slope of the fEPSP during the rising phase (20–60%). The average fEPSP slope during the 10 min before LTP induction was taken as baseline, and all values were normalized to this baseline (normalized fEPSP slope). The average of normalized fEPSPs slope from 55 to 60 min after induction was taken as a measure of the maintenance of LTP. The stimulus frequency during the baseline was 0.033 Hz. LTP was induced by TBS (15 bursts of four pulses at 100 Hz, delivered at an interburst interval of 200 ms). Paired-pulse facilitation (PPF) was induced by delivering two pulses with a 20-, 50-, 70-, 100-, or 200-ms interpulse interval.
All drugs were prepared as stock solutions and dissolved in ACSF on the day of the experiment. Antagonists were bath-applied >10 min before and during dexmedetomidine application with the exception of picrotoxin, which was only perfused for the 10 min before and during LTP induction. Dexmedetomidine was obtained from Abbott Japan (Osaka, Japan). Yohimbine, idazoxan, efaroxan, and prazosin were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). 2-benzofuranyl-2-imidaloline (2-BFI) and 2-(4,5-dihydroimidaz-2-yl)-quinoline (BU-224) were purchased from Tocris-Cookson (Bristol, UK). Picrotoxin was purchased from Research Biochemicals Incorporated (Natick, MA).
Baseline transmission and PPF between ACSF (the average of normalized fEPSPs slope from 15 to 20 min after perfusion of ACSF) and 50 nm dexmedetomidine (the average of normalized fEPSPs slope from 25 to 30 min after switching to dexmedetomidine) were compared using a nonparametric Mann–Whitney U test. The effects of different concentrations of dexmedetomidine (0, 25, 35, 50, and 100 nm) on LTP were compared using a nonparametric one-way ANOVA followed by Dunn’s multiple comparison test. Statistical comparisons of the data between groups (vehicle vs. dexmedetomidine) in the presence of yohimbine + WAY100635, efaroxan, idazoxan, BU-224, prazosin, and picrotoxin were performed using a nonparametric Mann–Whitney U test. Comparison among the effects of antagonists on LTP was performed using a nonparametric one-way ANOVA followed by Dunn’s multiple comparison test. Comparison of the difference in the dexmedetomidine effect on LTP in the presence of antagonists was performed using a nonparametric one-way ANOVA followed by Dunn’s multiple comparison test. Comparisons of the data obtained in the presence of ACSF, 2-BFI, BU-224, and BU-224 + 2-BFI were performed using a nonparametric one-way ANOVA followed by Dunn’s multiple comparison test. The concentration of dexmedetomidine that produces 50% of maximal inhibition (IC50) was calculated from a fitting curve of our data to Hill equations (nonlinear regression analysis using Graphpad-Prism software version 4.00; Graphpad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA). The number of animals tested is indicated by n. Probability values (P) <0.05 were considered statistically significant. The mean ± SEM is shown in all figures.
Effect of Dexmedetomidine on Basal Synaptic Transmission and PPF
shows the effect of dexmedetomidine on basal synaptic transmission and PPF (n = 5). After 20 min of baseline recording in ACSF, dexmedetomidine (50 nm) was applied. There was no change in the slope of the first (ACSF vs.
dexmedetomidine; 1.00 ± 0.01 vs.
0.99 ± 0.02, P
> 0.05) or second (ACSF vs.
dexmedetomidine; 1.94 ± 0.07 vs.
1.96 ± 0.08) fEPSP in the presence of dexmedetomidine, indicating that basal synaptic transmission and PPF were unaffected. Dexmedetomidine also did not significantly affect the PPF ratio at other interpulse intervals (control vs.
dexmedetomidine; 20, 50, 70, 100, and 200 ms: 1.72 ± 0.05 vs.
1.80 ± 0.09; 1.84 ± 0.05 vs.
1.79 ± 0.05; 1.76 ± 0.08 vs.
1.81 ± 0.02; 1.64 ± 0.10 vs.
1.57 ± 0.05; 1.41 ± 0.05 vs.
1.38 ± 0.02; n = 4 for each).
Effect of Dexmedetomidine on LTP
It has been reported that hippocampal LTP by TBS may be linked to the exploratory behavior of rodents in spatially novel environments.20–22
Thus, we used this pattern of high-frequency stimulation to induce LTP in our experiments. As has been reported by others,22,23
TBS induced robust and persistent LTP under control conditions (fig. 2
, open circles
). When 50 nm dexmedetomidine was perfused during TBS, maintenance of LTP was suppressed. LTP induction was measured at the peak, which occurred within 10 min post-TBS. The maximal normalized fEPSP slope was 2.17 ± 0.10 and 1.86 ± 0.10 for control and dexmedetomidine, respectively (n = 8 for each, P
> 0.05). Maintenance of LTP was assessed 60 min post-TBS. The normalized fEPSP slope was 1.82 ± 0.07 under control conditions and 1.38 ± 0.03 in the presence of dexmedetomidine (n = 8 for each; P
< 0.001). Similar experiments were performed using 25, 35, and 100 nm dexmedetomidine (fig. 3
, n = 8 for each). The effect of 100 nm dexmedetomidine was similar to that of 50 nm dexmedetomidine, suggesting saturation of the action. The IC50
of dexmedetomidine for LTP 60 min after TBS was 28.6 ± 5.7 nm as calculated from the dose–response curve in figure 3
. Because the variance of slope values was much greater at the peak than at 60 min post-TBS, 60 min post-TBS was used for the pharmacological analysis described below. We tested the effect of dexmedetomidine when it was applied after induction of LTP. In this case, dexmedetomidine (50 nm) did not affect LTP (control vs.
dexmedetomidine perfused after LTP induction; 1.78 ± 0.09 vs.
1.85 ± 0.14, P
> 0.05, n = 6 for each, data not shown), suggesting that dexmedetomidine acts during induction of LTP.
Effect of Dexmedetomidine on LTP in the Presence of the α2-Adrenoceptor Antagonist Yohimbine
It is well established that dexmedetomidine is a potent agonist of α2-adrenoceptors. Thus, to address the mechanism of dexmedetomidine action, we blocked α2-adrenoceptors using yohimbine (2 μm) and induced LTP in the presence or absence of 50 nm dexmedetomidine (fig. 4
). Yohimbine has a high affinity for α2-adrenoceptors (equilibrium KD
of 10 nm),24
and 2 μm yohimbine completely reversed the effects of noradrenaline on LTP in mouse amygdala in vitro 6
. To inhibit yohimbine activation of 5HT1a receptors,25
a 5HT1a receptor antagonist, WAY100635 (1 μm) was coperfused with yohimbine. The combination of yohimbine and WAY100635 did not completely block the dexmedetomidine effect (fig. 4
). We also tested a 10-fold higher concentration of yohimbine (20 μm), but LTP induction was severely inhibited at this concentration (mean potentiation was 1.12 at 60 min post-TBS, n = 2), thus preventing reliable assessment of dexmedetomidine action.
Effects of Efaroxan and Idazoxan on Dexmedetomidine-mediated Reduction of LTP
Because the combination of yohimbine and WAY100635 did not abolish the effect of dexmedetomidine on LTP, we suspected that another receptor system also could be involved. Dexmedetomidine has been reported to have affinity for imidazoline receptors as well as α2-adrenoceptors.12,13
We thus tested the α2-adrenoceptor and imidazoline type 1 receptor antagonist efaroxan (10 μm). This concentration of efaroxan was chosen because it completely blocked the suppressive effect of noradrenaline on perforant-path fEPSPs in mouse hippocampal dentate gyrus in vitro26
. LTP was induced in the presence of efaroxan with or without 50 nm dexmedetomidine (fig. 5
). Efaroxan did not completely block the dexmedetomidine effect.
Next, LTP was induced in the presence of 10 μm idazoxan, an α2-adrenoceptor and imidazoline type 2 receptor antagonist (fig. 6
). In the presence of idazoxan, 50 nm dexmedetomidine did not inhibit LTP, suggesting that α2-adrenoceptors and imidazoline type 2 receptors mediate the effect of dexmedetomidine on LTP.
Effect of 2-BFI and BU-224 on LTP
To clarify the role of the imidazoline type 2 receptor in LTP, the effect of 2-BFI and BU-224, selective imidazoline type 2 receptor ligands, on LTP were investigated (fig. 7
). 2-BFI at 10 μm, which is approximately the IC50
of monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibition in adipocytes,27
reduced LTP significantly (n = 8, P
< 0.05), but BU-224 did not have a significant effect (P
> 0.05, n = 8). The action of 10 μm 2-BFI was reversed by 10 μm BU-224 (n = 8).
Effect of Dexmedetomidine on LTP in the Presence of the Imidazoline Type 2 Receptor Ligand BU-224
The results above show that 2-BFI impaired LTP and that the action was abolished by BU-224. We next investigated the effect of BU-224 on dexmedetomidine-induced LTP inhibition to clarify the role of imidazoline type 2 receptor in dexmedetomidine-induced LTP inhibition (fig. 8
). Dexmedetomidine reduced LTP in the presence of 10 μm BU-224 (n = 8, P
< 0.05) compared with BU-224 alone (n = 8).
Effect of Dexmedetomidine on LTP in the Presence of the α1-Adrenoceptor Antagonist Prazosin
Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective α2-adrenergic agonist that also has weak affinity for α1-adrenoceptors,1
activation of which can likewise affect induction of hippocampal LTP.28
Therefore, we used the α1-adrenoceptor antagonist prazosin (1 μm) to investigate the contribution of α1-adrenoceptors to the dexmedetomidine effect. Dexmedetomidine reduced LTP in the presence of prazosin (fig. 9
), suggesting that participation of α1-adrenoceptors in the effects of dexmedetomidine is weak.
Effect of Dexmedetomidine on LTP in the Presence of the γ-Aminobutyric Acid (GABA) Type A Receptor Antagonist Picrotoxin
Feedback and/or feed-forward inhibition via
GABAergic interneurons regulates the induction of LTP.29
Furthermore, α2-adrenoceptors can regulate GABA release in the hippocampus.30,31
Thus, we investigated whether the GABAergic system participates in the action of dexmedetomidine. Picrotoxin, a GABA type A receptor antagonist, was perfused for 10 min before LTP induction. Picrotoxin was discontinued after TBS to reduce the generation of epileptiform activity, but dexmedetomidine (50 nm) was perfused throughout the experiment. The presence of picrotoxin during TBS did not block attenuation of LTP by dexmedetomidine (fig. 10
). The effects of dexmedetomidine in the presence of antagonists were summarized in table 1
In the present study, we found that dexmedetomidine reduced LTP and, in agreement with previous work,7
that PPF was unaffected by dexmedetomidine. PPF is thought to occur through presynaptic mechanisms.32
Therefore, it was suggested that dexmedetomidine does not affect dynamic changes in transmitter release that are required for PPF at Shaffer collateral terminals. However, LTP at Shaffer collateral-CA1 synapses is thought to occur via
mainly postsynaptic mechanisms.33,34
Therefore, it seems that dexmedetomidine affects postsynaptic events required for CA1 LTP. Two main postsynaptic events are considered for the mechanism of LTP; one is a targeting of α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-propionic acid-type (AMPA-type) glutamate receptors to the synapses and another is new protein synthesis triggered by high-frequency stimulation. The former causes the early phase of LTP (up to approximately 10 min after high-frequency stimulation), and the latter causes the later phase of LTP.33–35
Because the effect of dexmedetomidine on LTP was pronounced in the maintenance of LTP, it seems that dexmedetomidine mainly affects the late phase of LTP. β-Adrenoceptor activation facilitates induction of a protein synthesis–dependent late phase of LTP in the CA1.36
Therefore, reducing noradrenaline release via
activation of α2-adrenoceptors by dexmedetomidine and subsequent reduction of β-adrenoceptor-induced late-phase LTP is the most plausible mechanism underlying the α2-adrenoceptor-dependent component of dexmedetomidine-mediated reduction of LTP. It is well established that activation of α2-adrenoceptors reduces noradrenaline release in the hippocampus.10
The importance of endogenous noradrenaline for induction of β-adrenoceptor–induced LTP also has been demonstrated in the hippocampal CA1 field.11
α2-Adrenoceptor agonists impair LTP in various brain regions, including mouse amygdala,6
rat occipital cortex,37
and spinal dorsal horn.38
However, the effect of α2-adrenoceptor agonists, such as clonidine and dexmedetomidine, on hippocampal LTP has not been well established. A single report describes the effect of dexmedetomidine on LTP in the hippocampal CA1 field7
; in that study, dexmedetomidine (50 nm) did not reduce the maintenance of hippocampal LTP in the rat area CA1. In the present study, the same concentration of dexmedetomidine attenuated maintenance of hippocampal LTP in the mouse area CA1, but 25 and 35 nm dexmedetomidine had no significant effect. Therefore, slight species differences in dexmedetomidine sensitivity of α2-adrenoceptors or imidazoline type 2 receptors, or differences in receptor expression, most likely account for the observed differences in dexmedetomidine action. Differences in recording systems (an interface type chamber was used in the previous study7
) as well as in the LTP induction protocol (10 vs.
15 bursts of TBS) could also account for this discrepancy.
Our results suggest that not only α2-adrenoceptors, but also imidazoline type 2 receptors, participate in the action of dexmedetomidine on LTP. It has been reported that dexmedetomidine activates imidazoline receptors as well as α2-adrenoceptors,39
but the physiologic role of the former has not always been addressed. Our results suggest a novel role for activation of imidazoline receptors by dexmedetomidine, namely attenuation of hippocampal LTP in the CA1 field. This action of dexmedetomidine is mediated by imidazoline type 2 receptors. Idazoxan and efaroxan have distinct affinities for imidazoline receptor subtypes: idazoxan is relatively imidazoline type 2-selective, whereas efaroxan is relatively imidazoline type 1-selective.40
Efaroxan (10 μm) did not completely abolish the action of dexmedetomidine, but idazoxan did. Therefore, imidazoline type 2 receptors are involved in the dexmedetomidine effect. Furthermore, a highly selective imidazoline type 2 receptor ligand, 2-BFI, reduced LTP significantly at the concentration of 10 μm, which is approximately the IC50
on MAO activity in adipocytes.27
These results suggest that the LTP is modulated by imidazoline type 2 receptors. A previous study reported that 2-BFI binds to imidazoline type 2 receptors as an agonist in the modulation of supraspinal opioid antinociception, whereas BU-224 and idazoxan bind as antagonists.41
In the present study, 2-BFI inhibited LTP and BU-224 blocked the 2-BFI-mediated inhibition of LTP. Therefore, it is possible that 2-BFI acts as an agonist, whereas BU-224 acts as an antagonist in the modulation of CA1 LTP. However, BU-224 did not completely block dexmedetomidine-mediated LTP reduction. Because idazoxan completely reversed the dexmedetomidine effect, these findings suggest that dexmedetomidine inhibits LTP via
both imidazoline type 2 receptors and α2-adrenoceptors. α2-Adrenoceptor-deleted mice should be used to confirm the role of imidazoline receptors and α2-adrenoceptors for the suppressive effect of dexmedetomidine on LTP.
The mechanism by which imidazoline type 2 receptors reduce LTP was not addressed in the present study. The selective imidazoline type 2 receptor ligand, 2-BFI, impaired LTP. In the hippocampus, although the mechanism is still unknown, certain previous studies have indicated that 2-BFI reduces noradrenaline levels.42,43
Therefore, it is possible that imidazoline type 2 receptor activation inhibits hippocampal LTP via
the reduction of tissue noradrenaline concentrations. Imidazoline type 2 receptors are located on the mitochondrial outer membrane,44
and these sites are associated with MAO.45
The hippocampal CA1-field receives dense projections from noradrenergic fibers that originate in the locus coeruleus.46
The highly selective imidazoline type 2 receptor ligands, BU-224 and 2-BFI, inhibit MAO-A and MAO-B activity in adipocytes.27
In rat frontal cortex, BU-224 and 2-BFI elevate tissue noradrenaline concentrations.47
Together, these results suggest the possibility that the effects of BU-224 and 2-BFI on noradrenaline reflect MAO modulation. However, in hippocampus, 2-BFI and BU-224 had different properties on LTP in the present study: 2-BFI reduced LTP, whereas BU-224 had no effect, per se
, and abolished 2-BFI action. Therefore, it is unlikely that imidazoline type 2 receptors affect LTP via
MAO activity in the hippocampus.
In conclusion, our findings demonstrate that dexmedetomidine attenuates mouse hippocampal CA1 LTP. Both α2-adrenoceptors and imidazoline type 2 receptors are involved in this dexmedetomidine action. The finding that imidazoline type 2 receptors are involved in the dexmedetomidine-mediated reduction of LTP provides novel information regarding the basic actions of dexmedetomidine in the central nervous system.
1. Virtanen R, Savola JM, Saano V, Nyman L: Characterization of the selectivity, specificity and potency of medetomidine as an alpha 2-adrenoceptor agonist. Eur J Pharmacol 1988; 150:9–14
2. Sirvio J, Riekkinen P Jr, Ekonsalo T, Lammintausta R, Riekkinen PJ: The effects of dexmedetomidine, an alpha 2 agonist, on learning and memory, assessed using passive avoidance and water maze tasks in rats. Neuropharmacology 1992; 31:163–8
3. Haapalinna A, MacDonald E, Viitamaa T, Salonen JS, Sirvio J, Virtanen R: Comparison of the effects of acute and subchronic administration of atipamezole on reaction to novelty and active avoidance learning in rats. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 1999; 359:194–203
4. Sara SJ, Devauges V: Idazoxan, an alpha-2 antagonist, facilitates memory retrieval in the rat. Behav Neural Biol 1989; 51:401–11
5. Bliss TV, Collingridge GL: A synaptic model of memory: Long-term potentiation in the hippocampus. Nature 1993; 361:31–9
6. DeBock F, Kurz J, Azad SC, Parsons CG, Hapfelmeier G, Zieglgansberger W, Rammes G: Alpha2-adrenoreceptor activation inhibits LTP and LTD in the basolateral amygdala: involvement of Gi/o-protein-mediated modulation of Ca2+-channels and inwardly rectifying K+-channels in LTD. Eur J Neurosci 2003; 17:1411–24
7. Niittykoski M, Haapalinna A, Sirvio J: Diminution of N-methyl-D-aspartate-induced perturbation of neurotransmission by dexmedetomidine in the CA1 field of rat hippocampus in vitro. Neurosci Lett 2000; 281:95–8
8. Saunders C, Limbird LE: Localization and trafficking of alpha2-adrenergic receptor subtypes in cells and tissues. Pharmacol Ther 1999; 84:193–205
9. Kable JW, Murrin LC, Bylund DB: In vivo gene modification elucidates subtype-specific functions of alpha(2)-adrenergic receptors. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2000; 293:1–7
10. Starke K: Presynaptic autoreceptors in the third decade: focus on alpha2-adrenoceptors. J Neurochem 2001; 78:685–93
11. Yang HW, Lin YW, Yen CD, Min MY: Change in bi-directional plasticity at CA1 synapses in hippocampal slices taken from 6-hydroxydopamine-treated rats: the role of endogenous norepinephrine. Eur J Neurosci 2002; 16:1117–28
12. Wikberg JE, Uhlen S, Chhajlani V: Medetomidine stereoisomers delineate two closely related subtypes of idazoxan (imidazoline) I-receptors in the guinea pig. Eur J Pharmacol 1991; 193:335–40
13. Savola MK, Savola JM: [3H]dexmedetomidine, an alpha 2-adrenoceptor agonist, detects a novel imidazole binding site in adult rat spinal cord. Eur J Pharmacol 1996; 306:315–23
14. Regunathan S, Feinstein DL, Reis DJ: Expression of non-adrenergic imidazoline sites in rat cerebral cortical astrocytes. J Neurosci Res 1993; 34:681–8
15. Ruggiero DA, Regunathan S, Wang H, Milner TA, Reis DJ: Immunocytochemical localization of an imidazoline receptor protein in the central nervous system. Brain Res 1998; 780:270–93
16. Renouard A, Widdowson PS, Cordi A: [3H]-idazoxan binding to rabbit cerebral cortex recognises multiple imidazoline I2-type receptors: pharmacological characterization and relationship to monoamine oxidase. Br J Pharmacol 1993; 109:625–31
17. Takamatsu I, Sekiguchi M, Wada K, Sato T, Ozaki M: Propofol-mediated impairment of CA1 long-term potentiation in mouse hippocampal slices. Neurosci Lett 2005; 389:129–32
18. Zushida K, Sakurai M, Wada K, Sekiguchi M: Facilitation of extinction learning for contextual fear memory by PEPA: A potentiator of AMPA receptors. J Neurosci 2007; 27:158–66
19. Simon W, Hapfelmeier G, Kochs E, Zieglgansberger W, Rammes G: Isoflurane blocks synaptic plasticity in the mouse hippocampus. Anesthesiology 2001; 94:1058–65
20. Bland BH: The physiology and pharmacology of hippocampal formation theta rhythms. Prog Neurobiol 1986; 26:1–54
21. Otto T, Eichenbaum H, Wiener SI, Wible CG: Learning-related patterns of CA1 spike trains parallel stimulation parameters optimal for inducing hippocampal long-term potentiation. Hippocampus 1991; 1:181–92
22. Staubli U, Lynch G: Stable hippocampal long-term potentiation elicited by ‘theta’ pattern stimulation. Brain Res 1987; 435:227–34
23. Nguyen PV, Duffy SN, Young JZ: Differential maintenance and frequency-dependent tuning of LTP at hippocampal synapses of specific strains of inbred mice. J Neurophysiol 2000; 84:2484–93
24. Rouot B, Quennedey MC, Schwartz J: Characteristics of the [3H]-yohimbine binding on rat brain alpha2-adrenoceptors. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 1982; 321:253–9
25. Broderick PA: Alprazolam, diazepam, yohimbine, clonidine: In vivo CA1 hippocampal norepinephrine and serotonin release profiles under chloral hydrate anesthesia. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 1997; 21:1117–40
26. Otmakhova NA, Lewey J, Asrican B, Lisman JE: Inhibition of perforant path input to the CA1 region by serotonin and noradrenaline. J Neurophysiol 2005; 94:1413–22
27. Bour S, Iglesias-Osma MC, Marti L, Duro P, Garcia-Barrado MJ, Pastor MF, Prevot D, Visentin V, Valet P, Moratinos J, Carpene C: The imidazoline I2-site ligands BU 224 and 2-BFI inhibit MAO-A and MAO-B activities, hydrogen peroxide production, and lipolysis in rodent and human adipocytes. Eur J Pharmacol 2006; 552:20–30
28. Izumi Y, Clifford DB, Zorumski CF: Norepinephrine reverses N-methyl-D-aspartate-mediated inhibition of long-term potentiation in rat hippocampal slices. Neurosci Lett 1992; 142:163–6
29. Paulsen O, Moser EI: A model of hippocampal memory encoding and retrieval: GABAergic control of synaptic plasticity. Trends Neurosci 1998; 21:273–8
30. Pittaluga A, Raiteri M: GABAergic nerve terminals in rat hippocampus possess alpha 2-adrenoceptors regulating GABA release. Neurosci Lett 1987; 76:363–7
31. Maura G, Pittaluga A, Ulivi M, Raiteri M: Enhancement of endogenous GABA release from rat synaptosomal preparations is mediated by alpha 2-adrenoceptors pharmacologically different from alpha 2-autoreceptors. Eur J Pharmacol 1988; 157:23–9
32. Zucker RS, Regehr WG: Short-term synaptic plasticity. Annu Rev Physiol 2002; 64:355–405
33. Nicoll RA, Malenka RC: Expression mechanisms underlying NMDA receptor-dependent long-term potentiation. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1999; 868:515–25
34. Nicoll RA: Expression mechanisms underlying long-term potentiation: A postsynaptic view. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2003; 358:721–6
35. Nguyen PV, Abel T, Kandel ER: Requirement of a critical period of transcription for induction of a late phase of LTP. Science 1994; 265:1104–7
36. Gelinas JN, Nguyen PV: Beta-adrenergic receptor activation facilitates induction of a protein synthesis-dependent late phase of long-term potentiation. J Neurosci 2005; 25:3294–303
37. Mondaca M, Hernandez A, Perez H, Valladares L, Sierralta W, Fernandez V, Soto-Moyano R,: Alpha2-adrenoceptor modulation of long-term potentiation elicited in vivo in rat occipital cortex. Brain Res 2004; 1021:292–6
38. Ge YX, Xin WJ, Hu NW, Zhang T, Xu JT, Liu XG: Clonidine depresses LTP of C-fiber evoked field potentials in spinal dorsal horn via NO-cGMP pathway. Brain Res 2006; 1118:58–65
39. Takada K, Hayashi Y, Kamibayashi T, Mammoto T, Yamatodani A, Kitamura S, Yoshiya I: The involvement of pertussis toxin-sensitive G proteins in the post receptor mechanism of central I1-imidazoline receptors. Br J Pharmacol 1997; 120:1575–81
40. Eglen RM, Hudson AL, Kendall DA, Nutt DJ, Morgan NG, Wilson VG, Dillon MP: “Seeing through a glass darkly”: Casting light on imidazoline “I” sites. Trends Pharmacol Sci 1998; 19:381–90
41. Sanchez-Blazquez P, Boronat MA, Olmos G, Garcia-Sevilla JA, Garzon J: Activation of I(2)-imidazoline receptors enhances supraspinal morphine analgesia in mice: A model to detect agonist and antagonist activities at these receptors. Br J Pharmacol 2000; 130:146–52
42. Sastre-Coll A, Esteban S, Garcia-Sevilla JA,: Effects of 2-(2-benzofuranyl)-2-imidazoline (2-BFI) on dopamine synthesis in rat striatum in vivo. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1999; 881:364
43. Esteban S, Sastre-Coll A, Garcia-Sevilla JA,: Effects of imidazoline drugs on tyrosine and tryptophan hydroxylase activity in rat brain in vivo. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1999; 881:358
44. Tesson F, Parini A: Identification of an imidazoline-guanidinium receptive site in mitochondria from rabbit cerebral cortex. Eur J Pharmacol 1991; 208:81–3
45. Parini A, Moudanos CG, Pizzinat N, Lanier SM: The elusive family of imidazoline binding sites. Trends Pharmacol Sci 1996; 17:13–6
46. Lopes da Silva FH, Witter MP, Boeijinga PH, Lohman AH: Anatomic organization and physiology of the limbic cortex. Physiol Rev 1990; 70:453–511
47. Nutt DJ, Lalies MD, Lione LA, Hudson AL: Noradrenergic mechanisms in the prefrontal cortex. J Psychopharmacol 1997; 11:163–8
This article has been cited 3 time(s).
European Journal of PharmacologyThe alpha(2)-adrenoceptor agonist dexmedetomidine suppresses memory formation only at doses attenuating the perception of sensory inputEuropean Journal of Pharmacology
Critical Care ClinicsPharmacology of Sedative-Analgesic Agents: Dexmedetomidine, Remifentanil, Ketamine,Volatile Anesthetics, and the Role of Peripheral Mu AntagonistsCritical Care Clinics
International Journal of Molecular MedicineDexmedetomidine ameliorates intracerebral hemorrhage-induced memory impairment by inhibiting apoptosis and enhancing brain-derived neurotrophic factor expression in the rat hippocampusInternational Journal of Molecular Medicine
© 2008 American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc.
Publication of an advertisement in Anesthesiology Online does not constitute endorsement by the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc. or Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. of the product or service being advertised.