Avoidance of Nitrous Oxide for Patients Undergoing Major Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Myles, Paul S. M.B., B.S., M.P.H., M.D., F.C.A.R.C.S.I., F.A.N.Z.C.A.*; Leslie, Kate M.B., B.S., M.D., M.Epi., F.A.N.Z.C.A.†; Chan, Matthew T. V. M.B., B.S., F.A.N.Z.C.A.‡; Forbes, Andrew M.Sc., Ph.D.§; Paech, Michael J. M.B., B.S., D.M., D.R.C.O.G., F.R.C.A., F.A.N.Z.C.A., F.F.P.M.A.N.Z.C.A.∥; Peyton, Philip M.B., B.S., M.D., F.A.N.Z.C.A.#; Silbert, Brendan S. M.B., B.S., F.A.N.Z.C.A.**; Pascoe, Elaine B.Sc.††; the ENIGMA Trial Group
Background: Nitrous oxide is widely used in anesthesia, often administered at an inspired concentration around 70%. Although nitrous oxide interferes with vitamin B12, folate metabolism, and deoxyribonucleic acid synthesis and prevents the use of high inspired oxygen concentrations, the consequences of these effects are unclear.
Methods: Patients having major surgery expected to last at least 2 h were randomly assigned to nitrous oxide–free (80% oxygen, 20% nitrogen) or nitrous oxide–based (70% N2O, 30% oxygen) anesthesia. Patients and observers were blind to group identity. The primary endpoint was duration of hospital stay. Secondary endpoints included duration of intensive care stay and postoperative complications; the latter included severe nausea and vomiting, and the following major complications: pneumonia, pneumothorax, pulmonary embolism, wound infection, myocardial infarction, venous thromboembolism, stroke, awareness, and death within 30 days of surgery.
Results: Of 3,187 eligible patients, 2,050 consenting patients were recruited. Patients in the nitrous oxide–free group had significantly lower rates of major complications (odds ratio, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.56–0.89; P = 0.003) and severe nausea and vomiting (odds ratio, 0.40; 95% confidence interval, 0.31–0.51; P < 0.001), but median duration of hospital stay did not differ substantially between groups (7.0 vs. 7.1 days; P = 0.06). Among patients admitted to the intensive care unit postoperatively, those in the nitrous oxide–free group were more likely to be discharged from the unit on any given day than those in the nitrous oxide group (hazard ratio, 1.35; 95% confidence interval, 1.05–1.73; P = 0.02).
Conclusions: Avoidance of nitrous oxide and the concomitant increase in inspired oxygen concentration decreases the incidence of complications after major surgery, but does not significantly affect the duration of hospital stay. The routine use of nitrous oxide in patients undergoing major surgery should be questioned.
Click on the links below to access all the ArticlePlus for this article.
Please note that ArticlePlus files may launch a viewer application outside of your web browser.
NITROUS oxide has achieved remarkable longevity as an anesthetic, having been in widespread, worldwide use since 1844. However, the low toxicity of modern anesthetic agents, the accumulating evidence about the adverse effects of nitrous oxide,1–4
and the potential benefits of high inspired concentrations of oxygen5–7
provide compelling reasons to question the continued use of nitrous oxide in anesthesia.
Many of the adverse effects of nitrous oxide result from the irreversible inhibition of vitamin B12
, which inhibits methionine synthase, folate metabolism, and deoxyribonucleic acid synthesis.1,2
This mechanism explains reports of megaloblastic anemia and neurologic toxicity with prolonged nitrous oxide administration,8,9
and a possible increased risk of teratogenicity, immunodeficiency, and impaired wound healing.1,10,11
In addition, inactivation of methionine synthase is associated with increased plasma homocysteine concentrations,12,13
which may increase the risk of postoperative cardiovascular complications.12
Nitrous oxide impairs cerebral blood flow–activity coupling4
and worsens air space conditions (pneumothorax, air embolism) and bowel distension.2,3
Finally, nitrous oxide is a proven risk factor for postoperative nausea and vomiting,14,15
which is a common, troublesome, and costly complication of anesthesia.16
As a weak anesthetic, nitrous oxide is often administered as 70% of the inspired gas mixture, thereby limiting the inspired concentration of oxygen that can be delivered. Supplemental oxygen during surgery potentially reduces the risk of wound infection6,7
and nausea and vomiting,5
both of which are important contributors to duration of hospital stay and cost of care.
Despite the adverse effects that may result directly from nitrous oxide or from the restriction of inspired oxygen concentration, the use of nitrous oxide in patients undergoing surgery remains near-routine.17
The aim of this randomized controlled trial, therefore, was to evaluate whether avoidance of nitrous oxide in the gas mixture for anesthesia, an intervention that avoids potential nitrous oxide toxicity and in addition allows an increase in the inspired oxygen fraction, could decrease the duration of hospital stay after surgery and reduce postoperative complications, compared with a nitrous oxide–based anesthetic regimen, in adult patients presenting for major surgery. We chose a pragmatic trial design, aiming to include a variety of anesthetic regimens and hospital settings, because we wanted to measure the effectiveness of removing nitrous oxide from the anesthetic regimen in routine clinical practice.18–20
Materials and Methods
Patients eligible to take part in this study were aged 18 yr or older, were scheduled to undergo general anesthesia for surgery that included a skin incision and that was anticipated to exceed 2 h, and were expected to be in the hospital for at least 3 days after surgery. Patients undergoing cardiac surgery, or thoracic surgery requiring one-lung ventilation, were excluded. Patients were also excluded if the anesthesiologist considered that nitrous oxide was contraindicated (e.g.
, a history of postoperative emesis or if the anesthesiologist wanted to use supplemental oxygen for colorectal surgery). This was a multicenter trial with 19 participating sites around the world (see appendix
). The protocol was approved by the institutional review board at each site. Written informed consent was obtained from each participant.
A preliminary estimate of sample size was based on a clinically important reduction in mean duration of hospital stay from 4.0 days to 3.5 days (SD = 3 days), based on our previous research,21
for which a study with a type I error of 0.05 and a type II error of 0.1 would require approximately 800 patients per group with two-sided significance testing. We planned to include 2,000 patients in this study to allow for dropouts and the possibility of requiring nonparametric tests for the skewed duration of stay data. With a sample size of 2,000, a decrease in the rate of wound infection from 14% to 10% can be detected with 77% power.
A study Protocol and Procedures Manual was available to all staff, and each site’s research staff were trained and given 24-h access to the study coordinating center. The case report form documented all planned interventions, process variables, and outcomes. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either nitrous oxide–free or nitrous oxide–based general anesthesia, using a computer-generated code, accessed via an automated telephone voice recognition service. Treatment assignment was stratified by site and elective/emergency status of the surgery, using permuted blocks.
For patients assigned to nitrous oxide–free anesthesia, anesthesiologists were advised to administer a gas mixture of 80% oxygen with 20% nitrogen. However, a range of inspired oxygen concentration (25–100%) was allowed if the anesthesiologist had a strong preference, if medical air was unavailable, or if clinically indicated. Given that there is some evidence that high inspired oxygen concentrations may have beneficial effects,5–7
we planned a priori
to explore this effect in secondary analyses.
For patients assigned to the nitrous oxide–based anesthesia, anesthesiologists were advised to administer a gas mixture of 70% nitrous oxide with 30% oxygen, after induction of anesthesia, and until completion of surgery. If hemoglobin oxygen saturation was inadequate, any airway and ventilatory maneuvers deemed necessary, including an increase in inspired oxygen concentration, could be used.
All patients otherwise received standard anesthetic care and monitoring. Choice of other anesthetic drugs and intravenous fluids was at the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist. Choice of antibiotic prophylaxis was according to institutional practice. Anesthetic depth was adjusted according to clinical judgment and, if available, Bispectral Index monitoring (Aspect Medical Systems Inc., Newton, MA). Combined regional and general anesthetic techniques could be included. Anesthesiologists were advised to avoid intraoperative hypothermia (< 35.5°C), which is known to increase the risk of wound infection.22
In line with normal anesthetic practice, the inspired oxygen concentration could be increased to 100% in both groups at the conclusion of anesthetic administration. All other perioperative clinical care was conducted according to local practice. This included use of oxygen therapy, typically delivered via
a clear plastic non-Venturi mask at 4–8 l/min, in the postanesthesia care unit and postoperative surgical ward.
Attending anesthesiologists were required to have knowledge of group identity for the safe administration of anesthesia, but group identity was concealed from the surgeon using drapes or cardboard to screen the anesthesia machine. At the end of the procedure, the intraoperative case report form and documentation of group identity were faxed to the data management center and then placed in an opaque envelope by the anesthesiologist. The envelope was then sealed to ensure blinding of research staff conducting the postoperative follow-ups. The trial data management center checked each completed record for missing or illogical items within 24–48 h, with corrections verified via e-mail contact to the site coordinator and local study investigator. The anesthesia record was not concealed or removed from the patient’s medical record, because it is our experience that the anesthetic record is not perused by surgical staff. The patient and surgical staff were not informed of the patient’s group identity. All research staff, including those responsible for postoperative data collection and outcome assessment, were precluded by protocol from accessing the anesthetic record and so were blinded to group identity.
Preoperative demographic characteristics and details of patient medical and surgical history were recorded. A brief dietary history was obtained, including whether the patient took vitamin B or folate supplements on a daily basis. The National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System was used to define risk of wound infection.23
The National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System scores 1 point for each of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status III, IV, or V; contaminated or dirty-infected surgery; and duration of surgery (varied according to type of surgery) (total score = 0–3). The risk of postoperative nausea or vomiting was based on a modification of recently validated criteria24
: sex (female = 1, male = 0), age (< 50 yr = 1, ≥ 50 yr = 0), smoking status (nonsmoker = 1, smoker = 0), and intraoperative morphine administration (> 10 mg = 1, ≤ 10 mg = 0). This resulted in a score of 0 (low risk) to 4 (high risk).
Most patients (87%) were admitted to the postanesthesia care unit after surgery; those with serious medical conditions and/or undergoing extensive surgery were admitted to the intensive care unit (according to local practices). The anesthesiologist or, if delayed, the postanesthesia care unit nursing staff, recorded time of eye opening after surgery. The postanesthesia care unit nursing staff were asked to record the time of fitness for discharge, which was defined as a modified Aldrete score25
of 9 or greater (if used), or alternatively, at the time the patient was first awake, orientated, and had stable vital signs, and pain and emesis were controlled.
All patients were seen by a research assistant on the day after surgery to assess their quality of recovery and to detect awareness.26
If there was any evidence of any postoperative complication at this visit, or if notified by the surgical team at a later date, they were generally visited at regular intervals until hospital discharge. A 12-lead electrocardiogram was obtained before surgery and the day after surgery in all patients at risk of coronary artery disease. Any patient suspected of having coronary artery disease had blood collected on the first postoperative day after surgery for serum troponin estimation. Any other additional laboratory tests or other investigations were ordered when clinically indicated (e.g.
, fever, chest pain, dyspnea). Therefore, the frequency of the postoperative visits was determined by the patient’s clinical status. Finally, patients were contacted by phone at 30 days, and laboratory reports and the hospital record were reviewed to ascertain whether they had experienced any additional adverse outcomes.
Determination of Outcomes
To account for all the potential complications associated with nitrous oxide, we chose the duration of hospital stay as the primary endpoint of the study. This was defined as the duration from the start of surgery until actual hospital discharge. Patients transferred to another hospital were tracked until final discharge to home (or other final destination). In addition, we recorded duration of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) for patients who were transferred immediately after surgery.
As outlined above, patients were screened for a predetermined set of postoperative complications occurring in the first 30 postoperative days. Additional laboratory testing was performed by staff who were blinded to group allocation. If any event was identified, a report with confirmatory data was sent to an attending physician with dual qualifications in anesthesia and internal medicine for verification. The adjudicator was blind to group allocation. The following criteria were used:
1. Wound infection—if associated with purulent discharge, with or without a positive microbial culture; or pathogenic organisms isolated from aseptically obtained microbial culture27
2. Pneumonia—radiologic infiltrate confirmed by chest x-ray or computed tomography, in association with at least one of the following: temperature greater than 38°C, leukocyte count greater than 12,000/ml, or positive sputum culture that was not heavily contaminated with oral flora or that corresponded with positive blood cultures
3. Fever—a temperature greater than 37.5°C within 24 h after surgery
4. Pulmonary atelectasis—confirmed by chest x-ray or computed tomography
5. Pneumothorax—confirmed by chest x-ray or computed tomography
6. Severe nausea and vomiting—two or more episodes of expulsion of gastric contents at least 6 h apart, or if requiring at least three doses of antiemetic medication
7. Myocardial infarction—confirmed by a typical rise and fall in cardiac enzymes (troponin or creatine kinase-MB fraction) with at least one of the following: typical ischemic symptoms, new Q-wave or ST-segment electrocardiographic changes, or coronary intervention; or pathologic findings of myocardial infarction
8. Stroke—a new neurologic deficit persisting for 24 h or longer, confirmed by neurologist assessment and/or computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging
9. Awareness—postoperative recollection of intraoperative events, identified using a structured questionnaire,26
at 24 h and 30 days after surgery
10. Venous thromboembolism—(a) deep venous thrombosis with typical symptoms and signs, or confirmed with venography or duplex ultrasonography; (b) pulmonary embolism confirmed by ventilation/perfusion scan, spiral computed tomography, or autopsy
11. Blood transfusion—any erythrocyte transfusion within 30 days of surgery
12. Quality of recovery at 24 h after surgery—using the validated quality of recovery score instrument,28
a nine-item global assessment of early postoperative health status that is associated with patient satisfaction, completed on the morning after surgery. The quality of recovery score has a range of 0 (poor recovery) to 18 (excellent recovery). Collection of a preprocedure baseline score is also validated.
In addition, we formed two composite endpoints: “any respiratory complication” included pneumonia, atelectasis, pneumothorax, and pulmonary embolism; and “any major complication” included pneumonia, pneumothorax, pulmonary embolism, wound infection, myocardial infarction, venous thromboembolism, stroke, awareness, and death within 30 days of surgery.
All patients randomly assigned to nitrous oxide–free or nitrous oxide–based anesthesia undergoing eligible surgery were considered as comprising the intention-to-treat population for all primary and secondary analyses. Analyses of the primary outcome of duration of hospital stay was performed using the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model with adjustment for the prespecified covariates of age, ASA physical status, and duration of anesthesia. Assessment of the requisite proportionality assumptions was performed using diagnostic residuals. Duration of ICU stay was recorded only to the nearest day and therefore was analyzed by a discrete time analog of proportional hazards regression using binary regression with a complementary log–log link function.29
Deaths in the ICU were assigned the longest duration of stay, and analyses were repeated to adjust for the prespecified covariates listed above. Incidences of postoperative complications were analyzed using the chi-square test, with prespecified covariate adjustment performed by logistic regression. Results are expressed with hazard or odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The reference category for both ratios is the nitrous oxide group (being routine practice in most institutions). Therefore, a hazard ratio greater than 1 indicates a faster discharge rate in the nitrous oxide–free group compared with the nitrous oxide group, and an odds ratio less than 1 indicates a lower risk in the nitrous oxide–free group compared with the nitrous oxide group. Other secondary endpoints and differences in anesthetic procedures were assessed with t
tests, chi-square test, or Wilcoxon rank sum test according to distributional criteria.
A multivariate analysis exploring an independent effect of inspired oxygen concentration was planned, because previous studies identified a beneficial5–7
effect on some outcomes. Because “sicker” patients at increased risk of adverse outcomes would be expected to require a higher inspired oxygen concentration during surgery, we restricted the secondary analysis to the nitrous oxide–free group to minimize the possibility of selection (Berksonian) bias. Additional regression analyses were performed to explore the effect of possible covariate imbalance and to assess whether preoperative vitamin B12
or folate supplementation influenced the effects of nitrous oxide. All reported P
values are two-sided and not adjusted for multiple comparisons.
The 19 participating centers of the ENIGMA trial group recruited subjects between April 2003 and November 2004. Of 3,187 eligible patients, 2,050 surgical patients were enrolled (997 in the nitrous oxide–free group and 1,015 in the nitrous oxide group) (fig. 1
). Demographic, dietary, medical, and perioperative characteristics at baseline were similar in the two groups (table 1
). The median inspired oxygen concentration was 80% (interquartile range, 75–85%) for the nitrous oxide–free group and 30% (interquartile range, 30–32%) for the nitrous oxide group. There were 122 patients in the nitrous oxide–free group (12%) and 140 patients in the nitrous oxide group (14%) admitted to the ICU immediately postoperatively (P
= 0.30). There were some differences in anesthetic drug administration as a result of removing nitrous oxide from the inspired gas mixture (table 2
). Patients receiving a nitrous oxide–free anesthetic had a shorter time to eligibility to discharge from the postanesthesia care unit (P
= 0.02) (table 2
The median (interquartile range) duration of hospital stay was 7.0 (4.0–10.9) days in the nitrous oxide–free group and 7.1 (4.0–11.8) days in the nitrous oxide group. But the rate of hospital discharge did not differ between groups (hazard ratio, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.00–1.19; P
= 0.06; fig. 2
). There was also little evidence for nonproportionality of hazards (P
= 0.12). The hospital discharge rate ratio was largely unaffected after adjustment for age, ASA physical status, and duration of anesthesia (hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.97–1.16; P
The median duration of ICU stay was 1 day in each group, but patients in the nitrous oxide–free group were more likely to be discharged on any given day (hazard ratio, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.05–1.73; P
= 0.02; fig. 3
), with little evidence for nonproportionality of hazards (P
= 0.15). The ICU discharge rate ratio was largely unaffected after adjustment for age, ASA physical status, and duration of anesthesia (hazard ratio, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.12–1.85, P
= 0.005). Patients in the nitrous oxide–free group had a lower incidence of several postoperative complications, including severe nausea or vomiting, fever, wound infection, pneumonia, and atelectasis (table 3
). Patients in the nitrous oxide–free group were less likely to have at least one major complication compared with patients in the nitrous oxide group (16% vs.
21%; odds ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.56–0.89; P
= 0.003; table 3
). Selected subgroup analyses show comparable findings across a variety of clinical situations (fig. 4
Patients in the nitrous oxide–free group had better quality of recovery scores than patients in the nitrous oxide group (mean [SD], 12.2 [3.4] vs. 11.9 [3.9]; difference, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.01–0.66; P = 0.042). This was largely unaffected after adjustment for age, ASA physical status, duration of anesthesia, sex, and preoperative quality of recovery score (P = 0.042).
Secondary and Exploratory Analyses
Effect of Inspired Oxygen Concentration.
Data from the nitrous oxide–free group (n = 997) were analyzed to determine whether there was an independent effect of supplemental oxygen on key outcomes, after adjusting for prespecified potential confounding variables (as above). There was no measurable effect of supplemental oxygen on hospital stay (P
= 0.15), ICU stay (P
= 0.60), wound infection (P
= 0.40), or severe nausea or vomiting (P
= 0.88), but there was a reduction in fever (P
< 0.001). Additional exploratory analyses regarding this are available on the Anesthesiology Web site at www.anesthesiology.org
Effect of Preoperative Folate or Vitamin B Supplementation.
Three hundred eighty-nine study patients (19%) were taking vitamin B or folate supplements before surgery. Key outcomes were analyzed to determine whether the difference in outcome between the nitrous oxide–free and nitrous oxide–based groups varied according to vitamin B/folate supplementation (via interaction terms in Cox/logistic regression models), after adjusting for prespecified potential confounding variables (as above). There was no evidence that vitamin supplementation modified the effect of nitrous oxide on hospital stay (interaction P = 0.14), ICU stay (P = 0.32), fever (P = 0.49), wound infection (P = 0.58), severe nausea or vomiting (P = 0.86), any respiratory complication (P = 0.40), any major complication (P = 0.26), or quality of recovery (P = 0.59).
In this study, major postoperative complications, including postoperative fever, wound infection, pneumonia, pulmonary atelectasis, and severe nausea or vomiting, were significantly reduced if nitrous oxide was avoided. However, despite the decrease in postoperative complications, we did not observe a meaningful difference in duration of hospital stay between groups. Hospital stay is often used as an outcome measure after surgery,6,30,31
but can be affected by nonclinical factors and variable local practices. Furthermore, some postoperative complications are transient or can be readily treated and so may not affect hospital stay. This view is supported by figure 2
, which indicates no apparent difference between groups within the first 7 days after surgery, but that a difference may exist in those staying longer than 7 days, possibly because of increased postoperative complications.
The decreased risk of complications in the nitrous oxide–free group of our study could be explained by avoidance of nitrous oxide and/or administration of high inspired oxygen concentrations. We believe that, in a practical sense, this distinction is immaterial; regardless of whether the risk reduction is a result of nitrous oxide toxicity or direct benefits of supplemental oxygen, anesthesiologists should question the inclusion of nitrous oxide as part of their anesthetic regimen. We chose not to include a third group receiving 30% oxygen in 70% nitrogen,32
because this combination is not often used clinically and high inspired oxygen concentrations have been reported to be beneficial.5–7
Some anesthesiologists are concerned about absorption atelectasis occurring if nitrous oxide is avoided and high inspired oxygen concentrations are used.32
However, nitrous oxide promotes absorption atelectasis in the lung as effectively as breathing 100% oxygen,33
and we found a higher rate of atelectasis in the nitrous oxide group.
By allowing use of a lower or higher inspired oxygen concentration (25–100%) in the nitrous oxide–free group in our study protocol, we had an opportunity to examine our data for an independent effect of oxygen concentration. We found no evidence that oxygen concentration affected our main outcomes in the nitrous oxide–free group, but this exploratory analysis was limited by the small number (n = 156) of patients receiving inspired oxygen concentration of less than 51%. Some of the decreased adverse effects seen in the nitrous oxide–free group, therefore, could be attributed to supplemental oxygen. A recent meta-analysis could not confirm the previous suggestion of a significant reduction in nausea or vomiting with supplemental oxygen.34
Several recent studies have compared the effect of inspiring 80% oxygen and 30–35% oxygen on wound infection in colorectal surgery patients, but their results are conflicting. Two trials reported a beneficial effect,6,7
whereas one reported a detrimental effect, with the rate of wound infection more than doubled in the 80% oxygen group.30
Unlike the two former trials in which nitrogen (20% or 70%) made up the remainder of the inspired gas mixture,5,6
in the latter trial, some of the patients in both groups were given nitrous oxide. This trial has been criticized,35
but in view of the contradictory findings to date, the effect of supplemental oxygen on the risk of wound infection is unclear. A trial comparing nitrous oxide or nitrogen with an identical inspired oxygen concentration of 35% found no difference in wound infection rates, but the trial sample size was based on a doubling of the relative risk.31
Nausea or vomiting after surgery is rated by patients as one of the most undesirable postoperative complications.16
Our study found a marked reduction in the rate of severe nausea or vomiting in the first 24 h after surgery in the nitrous oxide–free group. Although this is consistent with the findings from one large trial (but our effect size is larger, perhaps due to longer duration of surgery)15
and a meta-analysis of small trials,14
our findings have greater clinical applicability, because minor or transient nausea or vomiting was excluded and so only genuinely distressing severe nausea or vomiting was included.16
The incidence of severe nausea or vomiting within 24 h of surgery in our study was reduced from 23% in the nitrous oxide group to 10% in the nitrous oxide–free group, giving a number needed to treat of 8. The simple intervention of removing nitrous oxide from the anesthetic regimen should therefore have a substantial impact on patient comfort after surgery.16
Indeed, we demonstrated a subsequent improved quality of recovery in patients in whom nitrous oxide was omitted. Patients allocated to the nitrous oxide group were less likely to receive an intravenous propofol anesthetic for maintenance (13% vs.
19%); maintenance with propofol has been shown to reduce the risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting.14
However, when we adjusted for this difference and other potential confounders in the analysis, the results remained unaffected.
Inclusion of nitrous oxide allows a dose reduction of other hypnotic agents; in our study, there was a 23% dose-reduction in volatile agent administration, but we found no significant effect on time to eye opening. In fact, patients receiving a nitrous oxide–free anesthetic were eligible for discharge from the postanesthesia care unit slightly faster than those receiving nitrous oxide. There is some concern that avoidance of nitrous oxide may also increase the risk of awareness during anesthesia.14
This may explain the higher rate of Bispectral Index monitoring in the nitrous oxide–free group in our study. The meta-analysis that suggested this increased risk was based on early studies, all of which were small. Widespread use of volatile agent monitoring, greater experience with intravenous maintenance techniques, and the ability to monitor anesthetic depth36
probably discount the contemporary validity of this meta-analysis. We found no evidence in our study that avoidance of nitrous oxide increases the risk of awareness, although the trial was not powered to address this issue.
Exposure to nitrous oxide beyond a few hours will reduce methionine synthase activity by 50%1
and can lead to clinically significant vitamin B12
and folate deficiency.37
These effects may be partly avoided with large doses of vitamin B12
Many studies have demonstrated that preoperative vitamin B or folate supplementation can increase plasma folate and decrease homocysteine concentrations.12,13
We found no evidence that the increased risk of adverse outcomes with nitrous oxide were mitigated by folate or vitamin B supplementation.
Subclinical adverse events (e.g.
, asymptomatic deep venous thrombosis) may have gone undetected. Many of our postoperative complications were detected by patient interview and/or medical chart review at postoperative day 30, and some of these were dependent on laboratory or radiologic investigation. This raises the possibility of detection bias, but we believe we controlled for this by prospectively defining each complication, blinding surgical and research staff to group identity, and including a blinded endpoint adjudication process that required documentary evidence. We undertook multiple comparisons, which increases the chance of a type I error; the secondary, exploratory, and subgroup analyses should be treated cautiously. Because we chose to study patients undergoing major surgery lasting at least 2 h, the trial selected those patients who were at greatest risk of nitrous oxide–induced adverse effects.2,12,13
Extrapolation of our findings to other situations, such as the use of nitrous oxide in minor surgery, pediatric surgery, or labor analgesia, should be avoided.
We found that a nitrous oxide–free anesthetic was associated with less myocardial infarction and death, but these were not statistically significant. However, this could be a type II error because our study was not of sufficient size to reliably address this question because these complications are rare in unselected patients. If nitrous oxide were to increase the risk of these serious postoperative complications, then this would be of marked clinical importance, and we have commenced a follow-up trial in 7,000 patients at risk of coronary artery disease (the ENIGMA II trial).§§
In conclusion, avoidance of nitrous oxide combined with supplementary oxygen in the gas mixture for anesthesia decreases the incidence of complications after major surgery but does not significantly affect duration of hospital stay. Whether the reduction in complications is due entirely to the known toxic effects of nitrous oxide, a possible beneficial effect of supplementary oxygen, or both, requires further study. In either case, the routine use of nitrous oxide in adult patients undergoing major surgery should be questioned.
The authors thank Val Gebski, Ph.D. (Biostatistician, NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, Sydney, Australia), for provision of the telephone-based voice recognition randomization service and Aushra Saldukas (Project Liaison Officer, Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia) for project management.
1. Nunn JF: Clinical aspects of the interaction between nitrous oxide and vitamin B12. Br J Anaesth 1987; 59:3–13
2. Myles PS, Leslie K, Silbert B, Paech M, Peyton P: A review of the risks and benefits of nitrous oxide in current anaesthetic practice. Anaesth Intensive Care 2004; 32:165–72
3. Akca O, Lenhardt R, Fleischmann E, Treschan T, Greif R, Fleischhackl R, Kimberger O, Kurz A, Sessler DI: Nitrous oxide increases the incidence of bowel distension in patients undergoing elective colon resection. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2004; 48:894–8
4. Kaisti KK, Langsjo JW, Aalto S, Oikonen V, Sipila H, Teras M, Hinkka S, Metsahonkala L, Scheinin H: Effects of sevoflurane, propofol, and adjunct nitrous oxide on regional cerebral blood flow, oxygen consumption, and blood volume in humans. Anesthesiology 2003; 99:603–13
5. Grief R, Laciny S, Rapf B, Hickle RS, Sessler DI: Supplemental oxygen reduces the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesthesiology 1999; 91:1246–52
6. Greif R, Akca O, Horn EP, Kurz A, Sessler DI: Supplemental perioperative oxygen to reduce the incidence of surgical wound infection. N Engl J Med 2000; 342:161–7
7. Belda FJ, Aguilera L, Garcia de la Asuncion J, Alberti J, Vicente R, Ferrandiz L, Rodriguez R, Company R, Sessler DI, Aguilar G, Botello SG, Orti R: Supplemental perioperative oxygen and the risk of surgical wound infection. JAMA 2005; 294:2035–42
8. Marie RM, Le Biez E, Busson P, Schaeffer S, Boiteau L, Dupuy B, Viader F: Nitrous oxide anesthesia-associated myelopathy. Arch Neurol 2000; 57:380–2
9. Schilling RF: Is nitrous oxide a dangerous anesthetic for vitamin B12-deficient subjects. JAMA 1986; 255:1605–6
10. Parbrook GD: Leucopenic effects of prolonged nitrous oxide treatment. Br J Anaesth 1967; 39:119–27
11. Mazze RI, Wilson AI, Rice SA, Baden JM: Reproduction and fetal development in rats exposed to nitrous oxide. Teratology 1984; 30:259–65
12. Badner NH, Beattie WS, Freeman D, Spence JD: Nitrous oxide-induced increased homocysteine concentrations are associated with increased postoperative myocardial ischemia in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy. Anesth Analg 2000; 91:1073–9
13. Badner NH, Drader K, Freeman D, Spence JD: The use of intraoperative nitrous oxide leads to postoperative increases in plasma homocysteine. Anesth Analg 1998; 87:711–3
14. Tramer M, Moore A, McQuay H: Meta-analytic comparison of prophylactic antiemetic efficacy for postoperative nausea and vomiting: Propofol anaesthesia versus omitting nitrous oxide versus total i.v. anaesthesia with propofol. Br J Anaesth 1997; 78:256–9
15. Apfel CC, Korttila K, Abdalla M, Kerger H, Turan A, Vedder I, Zernak C, Danner K, Jokela R, Pocock SJ, Trenkler S, Kredel M, Biedler A, Sessler DI, Roewer N: A factorial trial of six interventions for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. N Engl J Med 2004; 350:2441–51
16. Macario A, Weinger M, Carney S, Kim A: Which clinical anesthesia outcomes are important to avoid? The perspective of patients. Anesth Analg 1999; 89:652–8
17. Henderson KA, Raj N, Hall JE: The use of nitrous oxide in anaesthetic practice: A questionnaire survey. Anaesthesia 2002; 57:1155–8
18. Roland M, Torgerson DJ: Understanding controlled trials: What are pragmatic trials? BMJ 1998; 316:285
19. Myles PS: Why we need large randomised studies in anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 1999; 83:833–4
20. Tunis SR, Stryer DB, Clancy CM: Practical clinical trials: Increasing the value of clinical research for decision making in clinical and health policy. JAMA 2003; 290:1624–32
21. Myles PS, Hunt JO, Fletcher H, Smart J, Jackson T: Part 1: Propofol, thiopental, sevoflurane and isoflurane: A randomized controlled trial of effectiveness. Anesth Analg 2000; 91:1163–9
22. Kurz A, Sessler DI, Lenhardt R: Perioperative normothermia to reduce the incidence of surgical wound infection and shorten hospitalization. N Engl J Med 1996; 334:1209–15
23. Culver DH, Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ, Jarvis WR, Emori TG, Banerjee SN, Edwards JR, Tolson JS, Henderson TS, Hughes JM: Surgical wound infection rates by wound class, operative procedure, and patient risk index. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. Am J Med 1991; 91:152S–157S
24. Apfel CC, Laara E, Koivuranta M, Greim CA, Roewer N: A simplified risk score for predicting postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesthesiology 1999; 91:693–700
25. Aldrete JA: The postanesthesia recovery score revisited. J Clin Anesth 1995; 7:89–91
26. Brice DD, Hetherington RR, Utting JE: A simple study of awareness and dreaming during anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 1970; 42:535–42
27. Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR: Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999; 20:247–78
28. Myles PS, Hunt JO, Nightingale CE, Fletcher H, Beh T, Tanil D, Nagy A, Rubinstein A, Ponsford JL: Development and psychometric testing of a quality of recovery score after general anesthesia and surgery in adults. Anesth Analg 1999; 88:83–90
29. Singer JD, Willett JB: Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis: Modeling Change and Event Occurrence. New York, Oxford University Press, 2003
30. Pryor KO, Fahey TJ, Lien CA, Goldstein PA: Surgical site infection and the routine use of perioperative hyperoxia in a general surgical population: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2004; 291:79–87
31. Akca O, Podolsky A, Eisenhuber E, Panzer O, Hetz H, Lampl K, Lackner FX, Wittmann K, Grabenwoeger F, Kurz A, Schultz AM, Negishi C, Sessler DI: Comparable postoperative pulmonary atelectasis in patients given 30% or 80% oxygen during and 2 hours after colon resection. Anesthesiology 1999; 91:991–8
32. Fleischmann E, Lenhardt R, Kurz A, Herbst F, Fulesdi B, Greif R, Sessler DI, Akca O: Nitrous oxide and risk of surgical wound infection: A randomised trial. Lancet 2005; 366:1101–7
33. Joyce CJ, Baker AB, Kennedy RR: Gas uptake from an unventilated area of lung: Computer model of absorption atelectasis. J Appl Physiol 1993; 74:1107–16
34. Organ-Sungur M, Sessler D, Kranke P, Apfel C: Supplemental oxygen does not reduce postoperative nausea and vomiting: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (abstract). Anesthesiology 2005; October:A626
35. Akca O, Sessler DI: Supplemental oxygen and risk of surgical site infection. JAMA 2004; 291:1956–7
36. Myles PS, Leslie K, McNeil J, Forbes A, Chan MTV: A randomised controlled trial of BIS monitoring to prevent awareness during anaesthesia: The B-Aware Trial. Lancet 2004; 363:1757–63
37. Deleu D, Louon A, Sivagnanam S, Sundaram K, Okereke P, Gravell D, Al-Salmy HS, Al Bahrani I, Nam D, Knox-MacAulay H, Hanssens Y: Long-term effects of nitrous oxide anaesthesia on laboratory and clinical parameters in elderly Omani patients: A randomized double-blind study. J Clin Pharm Ther 2000; 25:271–7
38. Ogundipe O, Walker M, Pearson TW, Slater NG, Adepegba T, Westerdale N: Sickle cell disease and nitrous oxide-induced neuropathy. Clin Lab Haem 1999; 21:409–12
Members of the ENIGMA Trial Steering Group
Chairs: Paul S. Myles, M.B., B.S., M.P.H., M.D., F.C.A.R.C.S.I., F.A.N.Z.C.A. (Professor and Chair, Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Alfred Hospital and Monash University, Melbourne, Australia); and Kate Leslie, M.B., B.S., M.D., M.Epi., F.A.N.Z.C.A. (Associate Professor, Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia). Endpoint Adjudicator: James Tomlinson, M.B., B.S., F.R.A.C.P., F.A.N.Z.C.A. (Staff Anesthetist and Physician, Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia). Biostatisticians: Andrew Forbes, M.Sc., Ph.D., Elaine Pascoe, B.Sc. (both Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia). Data Management: Aushra Saldukas (Project Officer, Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia). Project Coordinator: Jennifer Hunt, R.N. (Clinical Trial Coordinator, Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia).
ENIGMA Trial Investigators, Participating Centers (with number of patients recruited in brackets)
Paul S. Myles, M.B., B.S., M.P.H., M.D., F.C.A.R.C.S.I., F.A.N.Z.C.A. (Professor and Chair, Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Alfred Hospital and Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria [n = 265]; Philip Peyton, M.B., B.S., M.D., F.A.N.Z.C.A. (Associate Professor, Department of Anesthesia, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria [n = 158]); Robert Solly, M.B., B.S., F.A.N.Z.C.A. (Staff Anesthetist, Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Geelong Hospital, Geelong, Victoria [n = 71]); Ross Kerridge, M.B., B.S., F.A.N.Z.C.A. (Anesthetist, Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, New South Wales [n = 36]); Michael Paech, M.B., B.S., D.M., D.R.C.O.G., F.R.C.A., F.A.N.Z.C.A., F.F.P.M.A.N.Z.C.A. (Professor of Obstetric Anesthesia, School of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, and Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, King Edward Hospital and Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia [n = 113]); Adam Tucker, M.B., B.S., Ph.D., F.A.N.Z.C.A. (Anesthetist, Department of Anesthesia, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, Victoria [n = 1]); Mark Reeves, M.B., B.S., F.A.N.Z.C.A. (Anesthetist, Department of Anesthesia, North West Regional Hospital, Burnie, Tasmania [n = 3]); Chris Orlikowski, M.B., B.S., F.A.N.Z.C.A. (Anesthetist, Department of Anesthesia, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Tasmania [n = 16]); Kate Leslie, M.B., B.S., M.D., M.Epi., F.A.N.Z.C.A. (Head of Research, Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Royal Melbourne Hospital; Honorary Associate Professor, Department of Pharmacology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria [n = 144]); Brendan Silbert, M.B., B.S., F.A.N.Z.C.A. (Anesthetist, Department of Anesthesia, St. Vincent’s Hospital, Fitzroy, Victoria [n = 106]); Richard Halliwell, M.B., B.S., F.A.N.Z.C.A., and Mark Priestley, M.B., B.S., F.A.N.Z.C.A. (Anesthetists, Department of Anesthesia, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales [n = 68]); John Grant, M.B., B.S., F.A.N.Z.C.A. (Anesthetist, Department of Anesthesia, Western Hospital, Footscray, Victoria [n = 71]). New Zealand:
Yatin Young, M.B., B.S., F.A.N.Z.C.A., and Douglas Campbell, M.B., B.S., F.A.N.Z.C.A. (Anesthetists, Department of Anesthesia, Auckland Hospital, Auckland [n = 17]). Hong Kong:
Matthew Chan, M.B., B.S., F.A.N.Z.C.A. (Anesthetist, Department of Anesthesia, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin [n = 640]). Singapore:
Nelson Chua, M.B., B.S., F.A.N.Z.C.A. (Anesthetist, Department of Anesthesia, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore [n = 64]). Saudi Arabia:
Abdelazeem El-Dawlatly, M.B., B.Ch., M.Sc., M.D., and Abdulhamid Samarkandi, M.B., B.Ch., M.D. (Anesthetists, Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, and College of Medicine, King Khalid University Hospital and King Saud University, Riyadh [n = 136]). United Kingdom:
Andrew Morley, M.B., B.S., F.R.C.A. (Anesthetist, Department of Anesthesia, St. Thomas’ Hospital, London [n = 36]); Ian Power, M.B., B.S., M.D., B.Sc.(Hons), F.R.C.A. (Professor, Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh and University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland [n = 2]). Cited Here...
§§ Available at: www.ClinicalTrials.gov
(NCT00430989). Accessed April 4, 2007. Cited Here...
This article has been cited 47 time(s).
Medical Journal of AustraliaSustaining Australian research through clinical trials and investigator networksMedical Journal of Australia
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D AnesthesieAn overview of quality and safety in health careCanadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D AnesthesieReview article: The anesthesiologist's role in the prevention of surgical site infectionsCanadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie
Anaesthesia and Intensive Care
Redheads and anaesthesia-Reply
Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, 41(1):
Bmc Oral HealthPractices and opinions on nitrous oxide/oxygen sedation from dentists licensed to perform relative analgesia in BrazilBmc Oral Health
British Journal of AnaesthesiaSingle-breath vital capacity high concentration sevoflurane induction in children: with or without nitrous oxide?British Journal of Anaesthesia
British Journal of AnaesthesiaRisk factors for severe postoperative nausea and vomiting in a randomized trial of nitrous oxide-based vs nitrous oxide-free anaesthesiaBritish Journal of Anaesthesia
Wound Repair and Regeneration
Guidelines to aid healing of acute wounds by decreasing impediments of healing
Wound Repair and Regeneration, 16(6):
British Journal of Anaesthesia
Memory and awareness during anaesthesia
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 101(5):
Anesthesia and AnalgesiaOverweight/Obesity and Gastric Fluid Characteristics in Pediatric Day Surgery: Implications for Fasting Guidelines and Pulmonary Aspiration RiskAnesthesia and Analgesia
Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association
Effect of High Perioperative Oxygen Fraction on Surgical Site Infection and Pulmonary Complications After Abdominal Surgery The PROXI Randomized Clinical Trial
Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association, 302():
Optimizing Surgical Care: A Contemporary Assessment of Temperature, Oxygen, and Glucose
American Surgeon, 76(6):
Anesthesia and AnalgesiaEvidence Is Lacking for Interventions Proposed to Prevent Unintended Awareness During General Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery ResponseAnesthesia and Analgesia
New England Journal of Medicine
Anesthesia awareness and the bispectral index - Reply
New England Journal of Medicine, 359(4):
Anesthesia and AnalgesiaPsychometric testing of the Chinese quality of recovery scoreAnesthesia and Analgesia
Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie
Quality, not just quantity: the role of qualitative methods in anesthesia research
Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie, 55():
TrialsPerioperative oxygen fraction - effect on surgical site infection and pulmonary complications after abdominal surgery: a randomized clinical trial. Rationale and design of the PROXI-TrialTrials
Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association
High Perioperative Oxygen Fraction for Abdominal Surgery and Risk of Surgical Site Infection
Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association, 303(6):
British Journal of AnaesthesiaEffect of nitrous oxide on plasma homocysteine and folate in patients undergoing major surgeryBritish Journal of Anaesthesia
Archives of Surgery
Perioperative Supplemental Oxygen Therapy and Surgical Site Infection A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Archives of Surgery, 144(4):
Journal of Clinical AnesthesiaEarly misconceptions about nitrous oxide, an "invigorating" asphyxiantJournal of Clinical Anesthesia
American Heart JournalNitrous oxide and perioperative cardiac morbidity (ENIGMA-II) Trial: Rationale and designAmerican Heart Journal
Anesthesia and AnalgesiaThe Use of Air in the Inspired Gas Mixture During Two-Lung Ventilation Delays Lung Collapse During One-Lung VentilationAnesthesia and Analgesia
Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association
High Inspired Oxygen Fraction and Surgical Site Infection
Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association, 302():
International Journal of Obstetric AnesthesiaA prospective study of awareness and recall associated with general anaesthesia for caesarean sectionInternational Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional TechniquesMatching groups for studying postoperative nausea and vomiting: should we care?Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques
Anesthesia and AnalgesiaThe Influence of Age on Sample Size Calculation in Acute Pain Trials Using Morphine Consumption as an End PointAnesthesia and Analgesia
Inhalation anesthetics: a review
Minerva Anestesiologica, 76(3):
British Journal of SurgeryContemporary perioperative care strategiesBritish Journal of Surgery
AnesthesiologyNitrous Oxide or Nitrogen EffectAnesthesiology
AnesthesiologyNitrous Oxide: Time to Laugh It Off? Not QuiteAnesthesiology
AnesthesiologyNitrous Oxide in Neuroanesthesia: Tried and True or Toxin?Anesthesiology
Anesthesiology2007 in Review: A Dozen Steps Forward in AnesthesiologyAnesthesiology
AnesthesiologyNitrous Oxide and Evidence-based Medicine: Here We Go AgainAnesthesiology
AnesthesiologyNitrous Oxide Remains a Valuable Adjuvant for SurgeryAnesthesiology
AnesthesiologyIs It Time to Retire High-concentration Nitrous Oxide?Anesthesiology
Current Opinion in AnesthesiologyNitrous oxide in pediatric anesthesia: friend or foe?Current Opinion in Anesthesiology
European Journal of Anaesthesiology (EJA)Ventilatory management during routine general anaesthesiaEuropean Journal of Anaesthesiology (EJA)
Supplemental Digital Content
© 2007 American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc.
Publication of an advertisement in Anesthesiology Online does not constitute endorsement by the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc. or Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. of the product or service being advertised.
- Articles in PubMed by Paul S. Myles, M.B., B.S., M.P.H., M.D., F.C.A.R.C.S.I., F.A.N.Z.C.A.
- This article in PubMed
- Articles in Google Scholar by Paul S. Myles, M.B., B.S., M.P.H., M.D., F.C.A.R.C.S.I., F.A.N.Z.C.A.
- Other articles in this journal by Paul S. Myles, M.B., B.S., M.P.H., M.D., F.C.A.R.C.S.I., F.A.N.Z.C.A.