Amnesic Concentrations of the Nonimmobilizer 1,2-Dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane (F6, 2N) and Isoflurane Alter Hippocampal θ Oscillations In Vivo
Perouansky, Misha M.D.*; Hentschke, Harald Ph.D.†; Perkins, Mark B.S.‡; Pearce, Robert A. M.D., Ph.D.§
Background: Drug-induced temporary amnesia is one of the principal goals of general anesthesia. The nonimmobilizer 1,2-dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane (F6, also termed 2N) impairs hippocampus-dependent learning at relative, i.e., lipophilicity-corrected, concentrations similar to isoflurane. Hippocampal θ oscillations facilitate mnemonic processes in vivo and synaptic plasticity (a cellular model of memory) in vitro and are thought to represent a circuit level phenomenon that supports memory encoding. Therefore, the authors investigated the effects of F6 and isoflurane on θ oscillations (4–12 Hz).
Methods: Thirteen adult rats were implanted with multichannel depth electrodes to measure the microelectroencephalogram and were exposed to a range of concentrations of isoflurane and F6 spanning the concentrations that produce amnesia. Five of these animals also underwent control experiments without drug injection. The authors recorded the behavioral state and hippocampal field potentials. They confirmed the electrode location postmortem by histology.
Results: The tested concentrations for isoflurane and F6 ranged from 0.035% to 0.77% and from 0.5% to 3.6%, respectively. Isoflurane increased the fraction of time that the animals remained immobile, consistent with sedation, whereas F6 had the opposite effect. Electroencephalographic power in the θ band was less when the animals were immobile than when they explored their environment. F6 suppressed the power of oscillations in the θ band. Isoflurane slowed θ oscillations without reducing total power in the θ band.
Conclusions: Drug-induced changes in θ oscillations may be a common basis for amnesia produced by F6 and isoflurane. The different patterns suggest that these drugs alter network activity by acting on different molecular and/or cellular targets.
TEMPORARY amnesia is one of the essential and desirable elements of the anesthetic state. The cellular and circuit-level mechanisms by which general anesthetics prevent memory formation are not understood. For volatile agents, amnesia is achieved at drug concentrations that are typically one quarter to one half the minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) that produces immobility in humans1,2
and in rodents.3,4
Although conventional volatile anesthetics can differ in their amnesic potency relative to MAC,5,6
there is also a class of drugs termed nonimmobilizers
that induces amnesia but not immobility.7
The amnesic properties of the nonimmobilizer F6 (1,2-dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane, also termed 2N) have been particularly well characterized. The EC50
values for suppression of short- and long-term memory for fear conditioning to context, which are hippocampus-dependent tasks, are 2.6% and 2.0% inspired concentration.8
Like conventional anesthetics, amnesia thus occurs at a low fraction of the concentration predicted from its lipophilicity to produce immobility (4.2%). Therefore, the mechanism by which this occurs may, at some level of integration, be similar to conventional volatile agents. If so, it may be instructive in understanding the mechanism by which conventional anesthetics produce amnesia.
In the hippocampus, synchronized activity of large neuronal populations gives rise to fluctuations of extracellular field potentials in the θ frequency band (4–12 Hz, θ rhythm or θ oscillations).9,10
Extensive evidence supports a link between θ rhythms and mnemonic functions, in rodents11
(for review, see Vertes and Kocsis12
) and probably in humans as well.13
We hypothesized that drug-induced alterations in θ oscillations may be a common basis for anesthetic-induced amnesia. Therefore, we investigated the effects of the nonimmobilizer F6 and the inhalational anesthetic isoflurane on hippocampal θ oscillations.
We found that both isoflurane and F6 altered θ frequency oscillations. However, the two drugs altered different aspects of the oscillations. Whereas isoflurane slowed oscillations without altering total power within the θ band, F6 had little or no effect on frequency, but it did reduce total power. These results suggest that disruption of θ oscillations may form a common basis for amnesia, but that isoflurane and F6 may act via different molecular and cellular targets, and even different circuit elements, to achieve this common effect.
Materials and Methods
All experiments were conducted according to the guidelines laid out in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources, National Research Council) and were approved by the University of Wisconsin Animal Care and Use Committee, Madison Wisconsin.
Young adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were housed in the animal care facility of the University of Wisconsin with free access to rat chow and water. Thirteen rats underwent electrode implantation. After the implantation of the electrode, the animals recovered for at least 7 days before being exposed to volatile agents. After each exposure, the animals were observed until they fully recovered and were then transferred back into their home cage. Each animal was exposed to an agent only once per day.
Linear microwire array recording electrodes with four sites spaced 200 μm apart were fabricated from 30-μm Formvar-insulated Nichrome wire14
(CFW-188-0012-HFV; California Fine Wire, Grover Beach, CA). Briefly, a piece of polytetrafluoroethylene tubing of 300 μm ID was cut along its long axis, and one half of the tubing was used as a form for the electrode array. Four holes were punched in the tubing at 200-μm intervals, and a single piece of 35-μm Formvar-insulated Nichrome wire was passed through each hole. Each wire was bent at a 90° angle to lie parallel to the inside wall of the form. The hemicylinder of tubing with the microwire bundle was filled with epoxy resin (Epoxylite 6001-M; Epoxylite Corp., St. Louis, MO) and heat cured. After discarding the polytetrafluoroethylene tubing, the hardened resin hemicylinder formed the shank of the electrode, and the wires were then broken off at right angles to the long axis of the array to form the recording sites. Finally, the resin matrix was sharpened at the tip to facilitate penetration of the brain, with the closest electrode approximately 25 μm away from the tip. The bare wires of the electrode array were connected to a Neuralynx EIB-16 interface board (Neuralynx, Tucson, AZ) with an Omnetics nanoconnector suitable for connecting to a small headstage (Neuralynx HS-16).
For the implantation, animals were anesthetized with 1.5–2% isoflurane and placed in a stereotactic apparatus. The skull was depilated, the bone was exposed by an incision, and holes were drilled in the right and left frontal, right parietal, and left occipital bones. Miniature stainless steel machine screws were inserted and advanced until contact was made with the dura. They served as anchors for the electrode assembly and as surface electrodes, with the screw in the occipital bone used as animal ground for reference. Finally, an additional hole was drilled 3.0 mm caudal to the bregma and 2.0 mm lateral to the midline. After incision of the dura, the electrode array was lowered until it contacted the cortex and then advanced 2.6 mm. Postmortem histologic examination showed that electrodes were successfully implanted into the CA1 region of the dorsal hippocampus in 10 of the rats, and only data from these animals were used for field-potential analysis (fig. 1A
). After at least 1 week of recovery, electroencephalographic signals from the CA1 electrodes and from surface electrodes were recorded under control conditions and in the presence of isoflurane or F6 (fig. 1B
After an animal had undergone all planned experiments, it was anesthetized deeply with isoflurane and perfused intracardially with 0.1 m phosphate-buffered saline followed by 4% paraformaldehyde. The brain was removed and placed in 4% paraformaldehyde. After fixation, 100-μm-thick slices were prepared, stained with cresyl violet, and mounted on coverslips to verify the location of the electrode by the tissue disruption it had caused (fig. 1A
). The most ventral extent of the tissue damage was taken as the location of the tip of the linear array, and the electrode locations were estimated using the spacing parameters from the fabrication process.
On the day of an experiment, the animal was placed into a custom-made 10-l polymethyl methacrylate (acrylic glass) chamber equipped with ports for drug injection, gas sampling, and connection to the recording equipment. Adhesive tape sealed the lid of the chamber and all ports. Five minutes of acclimation were followed by a 15-min control period, after which a loading dose of the drug to be tested was injected. Distilled water was injected for control experiments. A fan accelerated the evaporation and distribution of volatile agents that were deposited into a glass Petri dish via a polytetrafluoroethylene tube. Soda lime scavenged carbon dioxide. We took gas samples from the chamber with airtight glass syringes for gas chromatography at 5, 15, 22.5, and 30 min after the initial drug injection. The last three measurements were averaged and considered to represent the tested concentration. The concentration of the drug was kept approximately constant by injecting additional small boluses 10 and 20 min after the initial injection. In preliminary experiments, we determined that, with this protocol, it was possible to maintain stable concentrations (within 20% of the reported concentrations) of the agent throughout the 30 min of drug exposure. Drug washout was achieved by suctioning the chamber and allowing fresh air to enter the chamber. The oxygen concentration in the chamber was constantly monitored with a gas analyzer (POET II; Criticare Systems Inc, Waukesha WI) and maintained above 20%. In most experiments, a dedicated but electroencephalogram-blinded observer scored the animal's behavior. In addition, we videotaped the animal for post hoc analysis. The 15 min before drug injection (0–15 min), before drug removal (30–45 min), and before the end of the experiment (60–75 min after beginning of the recording) were defined as the control, test, and recovery time periods for analysis.
The observer classified the behavior as immobile, exploring, grooming, or undefined. Exploring was considered any behavior that involved movement of the animal's head or body that was not grooming related, and included walking, sniffing, or manipulating any of the objects present in the tray. Grooming included scratching, face and paw washing. Immobile did not include assumption of the sleep posture (curling up), which was infrequent and which we classified as undefined. In practice, only exploring and immobile behaviors, corresponding to type I and type II behaviors, respectively,15
were observed with sufficient duration and frequency for subsequent data analysis.
Data Acquisition and Analysis
Electroencephalographic signals were amplified by a unity-gain HS-16 headstage preamplifier to reduce movement-related artifacts, a Lynx-8 second-stage amplifier (both from Neuralynx, Tucson AZ), band-passed between 1 and 325 Hz, and digitized at 1,000 Hz using a DigiData 1200 A/D converter (Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA). Data acquisition and processing were controlled with the pClamp software suite (Axon Instruments) and stored for analysis on a Pentium-based (Intel Corporation, Santa Clara, CA) personal computer.
Only the signal from the electrode closest to the hippocampal fissure, as revealed by postmortem histologic examination, was used for analysis. Data analysis was performed primarily with custom-written routines in Matlab (MathWorks, Natick, MA). Origin (MicroCal, Northampton, MA) and Instat (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA) were used for graphical presentation and statistical analysis. In a preprocessing step, the raw data were passed through a digital band-pass filter (attenuation 40 dB/octave) designed for the extraction of signals in the θ frequency band. The −3 dB (corner) frequencies were 4 and 12 Hz. Artifacts occurred primarily from mechanical causes and were excluded from analysis together with adjacent data points (± 0.5–1 s, as necessary). Subsequently, data were sorted by behavior and the raw and filtered data were subdivided into segments of 4,096 points each (approximately 4 s) with 30% overlap (1,365 points). Shorter data segments were not analyzed. All parameters described below were computed for each segment and then averaged with other segments obtained for the same drug condition and behavior for a given animal.
For spectral analysis, we computed the fast Fourier transform using a Hamming window to obtain the power spectral density. From the power spectral density, we extracted the power in distinct frequency bands (the integral of the power spectral density within the frequency ranges detailed above) as well as amplitude and frequency of the θ peak (fig. 1C
Unless indicated otherwise, all numerical results are expressed as changes relative to time- and behavior-matched control experiments. For individual data points, linear regression lines were fitted according to the model Yi = A + BXi, with the parameters A (intercept) and B (slope) estimated by the method of least squares minimization. The correlation between drug concentration and change in the measured parameter was considered significant if the null hypothesis of zero slope could be rejected at P < 0.05.
After being placed into the experimental chamber and connected to the recording equipment, each rat spontaneously explored its environment, groomed, or remained immobile. The fraction of time each individual spent on these behaviors differed, but a certain pattern prevailed: Over the first 45 min in the drug-free experiments (water injections and sham sampling, see time course of experiments in fig. 2
), as the rats became familiar with the chamber, they typically spent an increasing fraction of time immobile (fig. 2A
). This pattern of progressive immobility/diminishing exploration was interrupted by opening the chamber to rapidly evacuate volatile agents 45 min after the start of the experiment. This intervention always led to a burst of exploratory activity that quickly abated as the rats returned to their baseline activity level, and this remained approximately constant for the remaining 30 min of the experiment.
F6 and isoflurane both affected the behavioral pattern, but in opposite directions. Increasing concentrations of F6 progressively reduced the amount of time the rats spent immobile (figs. 2B and C
), so that at 3.5% (0.85 MACpred
), they explored the cage almost constantly. After evacuating the drug, the animals gradually reverted to a behavioral pattern that resembled the drug-free experiments. Isoflurane had the opposite effect. With increasing isoflurane concentrations, the rats spent progressively more time immobile. The effect of 0.35% isoflurane is illustrated in figure 2D
. After suctioning, the rats gradually reverted to an activity pattern similar to that under drug-free conditions. We conclude that F6 has no sedative properties at concentrations that were shown previously to produce amnesia.7,8
Behavioral States Correlate with the Power of Activity in the θ Band
In the rodent hippocampus, θ oscillations are prominent during two behavioral states: rapid eye movement sleep,11
and waking behaviors associated with locomotor activity that have been described by the terms preparatory
, or exploring
To validate our behavioral scoring with respect to its ability to separate low-θ from high-θ states under control conditions and during drug exposure, we compared the characteristics of the power spectrum of the electroencephalogram in the θ band during behaviors we characterized as exploring, versus
immobile. The averaged results from three animals tested drug free (i.e.
, water vapor), in F6 (2.2 ± 0.08%), and in isoflurane (0.35 ± 0.04%) are presented in figure 3
. Under drug-free conditions (i.e.
, during water vapor exposure), the animals spent an average of 3 ± 1, 17 ± 16, and 78 ± 16% of the time grooming, exploring, and immobile, respectively (fig. 3A
, pie chart). Comparison of the aggregate electroencephalographic activity in the θ band confirmed the expected difference between immobile and exploring states (fig. 3A
): θ oscillations were more prominent during exploratory behavior. Note, however, that a clear peak in the spectral density within the θ frequency range was also present during the immobile state, albeit with a slower peak frequency (7.7 ± 0.6 Hz exploring vs.
6.6 ± 0.8 Hz immobile; P
< 0.05). In the presence of 2.2% F6, the difference in θ power between exploring and immobile states was maintained, again with θ-peak frequency slower during immobile than during exploring (6.8 ± 0.1 vs.
7.7 ± 0.1 Hz; P
= 0.02; fig. 3B
). In the presence of 0.35% isoflurane, the animals spent most of the time immobile (90 ± 6% vs.
6 ± 4%). Still, the average power of θ oscillations during the brief periods of exploration was higher than during immobility (fig. 3C
). There was, however, no difference in the peak frequency (5.9 ± 0.3 vs.
5.8 ± 0.3 Hz). We therefore conclude that our behavioral assessment was able to separate high-θ from low-θ states under control conditions and during the application of volatile agents. The observed difference in θ power between behavioral states supports the separation of drug effects on θ oscillations by making behavioral state-specific comparisons.
Isoflurane and F6 Modulate Oscillations in the θ Band
Hippocampal θ oscillations facilitate mnemonic processes, and interventions that impair the generation or the expression of θ oscillations in the hippocampus impair memory (for review, see Vertes et al.17,18
). To test the hypothesis that inhalational agents with different behavioral profiles (anesthetic vs.
nonimmobilizer) modulate θ rhythms at concentrations that are amnesic, we measured the effects of isoflurane and F6 on θ oscillations in the hippocampus in vivo
. Because the behavioral state affects the characteristics of this rhythm, we analyzed the effects separately for the exploring and the immobile states.
The effects of both drugs on power spectra acquired from one animal during exploration are illustrated in figure 4A
. This animal was tested with two concentrations of isoflurane (0.35% and 0.77%) and one concentration of F6 (2.2%). The spectrograms show that both drugs altered θ oscillations, but also illustrate differences between the two agents in their effect on all three analyzed parameters: isoflurane (top panel) progressively reduced oscillation frequency and markedly increased the amplitude of the θ peak (from 7.57 Hz to 4.88 Hz and from 0.0434 to 0.0963 mV2
/Hz, respectively at 0.77%) while slightly reducing the total power in the θ band (from 0.079 mV2
to 0.071 mV2
). By contrast, 2.2% F6 (shown inverted in the lower panel), i.e.
, the MACpred
equivalent of 0.77% isoflurane, reduced the amplitude of the θ peak and, rather than slowing the oscillation, slightly accelerated it (from 0.0419 mV2
/Hz to 0.0249 mV2
/Hz and from 7.57 to 7.81 Hz, respectively). F6 also markedly reduced the total power between 4 and 12 Hz (from 0.081 mV2
to 0.051 mV2
The results from all experiments are summarized in figure 4B
. Theta-peak amplitude was decreased by F6 (slope = −0.52, P
< 0.0001), whereas it was increased by isoflurane (slope = 1.47, P
= 0.0005; fig. 4B
, top). Power in the θ band was reduced by F6 but not significantly affected by isoflurane (slope = −0.38, P
< 0.0001 and slope = 0.43, P
= 0.18, respectively; fig. 4B
, middle). Isoflurane slowed θ-peak frequency in a dose-dependent manner (slope = −0.61, P
< 0.0001). By contrast, F6 did not alter θ-peak frequency (slope = 0.06, P
= 0.09; fig. 4B
Drug Effects in the Immobile State
We also analyzed the effects of isoflurane and F6 on the electroencephalogram during immobility. Theta oscillations occur during immobility in the awake rat, under certain behavioral conditions.19
Immobility represented a major fraction of the experimental time under most conditions and is likely to include multiple behavioral states that we did not further separate. The results are summarized in figure 5
. In the immobile state, both drugs affected θ oscillations in several ways qualitatively similar to effects during the exploring state, with slowing of the peak frequency by isoflurane and suppression of power by F6 (fig. 5A
). The results from all experiments are presented in figure 5B
. F6 suppressed power in the θ band (slope = −0.22, P
= 0.02; fig. 5B
, middle), and isoflurane slowed the θ peak (slope = −0.36, P
< 0.0001). The other effects were not significant.
We investigated the effect of a nonimmobilizer and an anesthetic on hippocampal network activity in freely behaving rats. We found that the nonimmobilizer F6, at concentrations that inhibit hippocampal-dependent learning,8
suppressed the power of oscillations in the θ band (4–12 Hz) without sedating the animals. Isoflurane also affected θ rhythm, but in a contrary way: It slowed the oscillations and increased power in the θ band. At amnesic concentrations,20
isoflurane caused pronounced sedation.
F6 Is Not Sedative
A striking behavioral observation is the increased locomotor activity exhibited by the animals at concentrations of F6 above 0.5 MACpred
. This finding is in stark contrast to the reduced locomotion observed with isoflurane at or above 0.25 MAC (fig. 2
). Motor activity is a measure of sedation and, in the case of benzodiazepines, sedation is mediated selectively by enhancement of α1
subunit–containing γ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA
In expressed receptor studies, isoflurane was also shown to enhance currents in response to low and high concentrations of GABA mediated by α1
F6, by contrast, did not enhance responses to high GABA concentrations.24
Similarly, in studies of synaptic receptors in situ
, isoflurane was shown to enhance charge transfer by GABAA
ergic synaptic currents, whereas F6 did not.25
A differential effect of the sedating anesthetic isoflurane versus
the nonsedating nonimmobilizer F6 at synaptic GABAA
receptors is thus consistent with (but does not prove) a role for these receptors in mediating the sedative effects of isoflurane and other potent inhalational agents. We suggest that F6 could be useful in probing the role of other receptors, e.g.
, extrasynaptic GABAA
receptors, which have been shown to be sensitive to very low concentrations of anesthetics26,27
in mediating volatile anesthetic–induced sedation.
F6 and Isoflurane Impair Learning
The amnesic effects of anesthetics in animal models have been most thoroughly characterized using fear conditioning as an experimental paradigm for learning and memory. The experimental conditions can be modified to preferentially involve different brain structures: fear conditioning to tone and fear conditioning to context. The former depends on the amygdala but not the hippocampus, whereas the latter requires processing by the amygdala and the hippocampus. The hippocampus-dependent learning paradigm (fear conditioning to context) is significantly more sensitive to impairment by isoflurane, with an EC50
of 0.19%, than fear conditioning to tone, which requires approximately 0.38% isoflurane to achieve a similar degree of suppression (0.13 and 0.26 MAC, respectively).20
Intriguingly, in MAC equivalents, F6 has a similar differential potency to prevent learning and memory as isoflurane in these two paradigms, suggesting that it does so by similar mechanisms, on the molecular, the cellular, or the network level. However, recent studies demonstrating that F6 and isoflurane display behavioral antagonism in their amnesic effects over low concentration ranges caused Eger et al.28
to question this conclusion. Our finding that the two drugs alter θ oscillations differently, i.e.
, isoflurane increasing and F6 reducing peak amplitude (fig. 4
), may help to account for this antagonism.
Neural Correlates of Memory Impairment
In humans as well as rodents, the hippocampus plays an important role in spatial and episodic memory.29
The most conspicuous electrical activity in the hippocampus is the θ rhythm (θ oscillations), which is among the largest extracellular synchronous signals that can be recorded in the mammalian brain. In the behaving rat, the oscillations are nearly sinusoidal, and their frequency ranges from 5 to 12 Hz.9
The θ rhythm is generally thought to consist of two components that can be separated using pharmacologic15
and, more recently, genetic30
tools. It has been implicated in multiple tasks, including arousal and sensorimotor integration.31
In addition, the θ rhythm seems also to serve a critical role in mnemonic functions of the hippocampus.17
We found that F6 suppressed the peak amplitude of the θ oscillation and the total power in the θ band (fig. 4B
, top and middle traces). Surprisingly, the frequency profile was not changed: θ-peak frequency remained primarily dependent on the behavioral state (exploring faster than immobile; fig. 3B
) with only minimal acceleration by F6 (fig. 4B
, bottom trace). Isoflurane, by contrast, did not reduce power in the θ band but rather slowed the frequency of the θ peak in both behavioral states. It seems, therefore, that F6 and isoflurane have almost opposite effects on the hippocampal θ rhythm. Therefore, the question arises whether these are in any way linked to the memory impairment that both drugs exhibit, and what the mechanism for this differential modulation might be.
Previous work using selective perfusion of various brain structures with local anesthetics involved in the generation and modulation of θ oscillations indicated that frequency and power of evoked θ were encoded in different brain structures and could be modulated independently. The effect of procaine infusion into the medial septum (MS) or the medial forebrain bundle was similar to the effect of systemically delivered F6 in our experiments, in that it reduced the amplitude without changing the oscillation frequency.32
Although many of these experiments were conducted in urethane-anesthetized animals, where only the atropine-sensitive type of θ rhythm is present, similar results have been obtained from awake animals.33,34
Because θ suppression induced by tetracaine injection into or electrolytic lesions of the MS was associated with learning impairment,35,36
it is plausible that depression of θ oscillations by F6 underlies its impairment of learning and memory.
What might the molecular and cellular targets of F6 be that underlie its selective effects on amplitude but not frequency of the θ oscillation? Because in our experiments F6 was present throughout the brain, its singular effect on θ oscillations could have been mediated in any of the brain structures that shape θ rhythms. However, sites rostral to the medial supramammillary nucleus seem to be likely candidates because injections of procaine into the medial supramammillary nucleus and caudal to it were shown previously to affect either only θ frequency or both frequency and amplitude.32,34
Procaine and other local anesthetics are sodium channel blockers that indiscriminately silence all neurons in the vicinity of their injection site, so selectivity of their effect is determined by the extent the anesthetic spreads in the tissue around the injection site. With respect to the involvement of specific transmitters in these actions, available experimental data suggest that suppression of θ power without changes in frequency, accompanied by impairment of spatial memory, can be achieved via
activation of GABAA
receptors in the MS.37,38
Because fast GABAA
ergic synaptic currents remain typically unchanged by F6 but are enhanced by isoflurane,25,39
it is unlikely that effects of F6 on receptors at these types of synapses account for our observations. However, for some subunit combinations, responses generated by low GABA concentrations are enhanced by F6.40
Therefore, effects on tonic GABA currents or on slow synaptic currents produced by subsaturating concentrations of neurotransmitter at perisynaptic sites41
may contribute to suppression of θ oscillations by F6.
Activation of opioid receptors in the MS can also lead to θ suppression accompanied by memory impairment.42
Although the effects of F6 on opioid receptors have not been studied directly, it is unlikely that F6 is an effective agonist at these receptors as it has no analgesic properties in vivo
Hippocampal θ oscillations are also under strong cholinergic modulation. Selective elimination of septal cholinergic neurons with 193-immunoglobulin G-saporin leads to almost complete suppression of θ in the awake animal, without a change in the peak frequency of the residual rhythm.44
Similarly, selective pharmacologic blockade of muscarinic m1-type receptors reduced θ power (as opposed to frequency) in the behaving cat.45
Remarkably, F6 but not isoflurane inhibited expressed muscarinic m1 receptors (by 30% at 1 MACpred
Another possibility, therefore, is that F6 reduces θ oscillations by inhibition of muscarinic receptors in the MS, and that this underlies its amnesic effects.
If reduction of power in the θ band is the signature of the effect of F6 on synchronized activity in the hippocampus, slowing of θ rhythm is the equivalent for isoflurane. Although isoflurane can affect multiple receptor types, at amnesic concentrations modulation of GABAA
receptors is most prominent. Evidence from experiments using benzodiazepines, which are selective GABAA
receptor modulators, supports an association between slowing of θ and amnesia. The benzodiazepine chlordiazepoxide, administered systemically at a dose sufficient to slow θ rhythm by 1 Hz, was accompanied by impaired spatial learning in rats.48
Slowing of θ to a similar degree by nonpharmacologic means (systemic cooling) led to a comparable degree of learning impairment.48
The conclusion drawn by the authors from these experiments was that θ frequency per se
may be important for some forms of learning. Our observation that 0.25 MAC isoflurane, a concentration that causes significant impairment of hippocampus-dependent learning,20
slowed θ-peak frequency from 7.5 ± 0.3 Hz to 6.0 ± 0.3 Hz (P
= 0.001, n = 4) is thus consistent with the hypothesis that isoflurane-induced amnesia results from altered θ oscillations.
In summary, we have shown that F6 and isoflurane both affect synchronized neuronal activity in the rodent hippocampus but in qualitatively different ways. F6 caused reduced amplitude but not frequency of θ rhythms at amnesic concentrations without sedation. Isoflurane slowed θ and caused marked sedation. Either effect on θ rhythm is compatible with impairment of learning and memory.
The authors thank Michael Laster, D.V.M. (Assistant Researcher), and Edmond Eger II, M.D. (Professor, Department of Anesthesia, University of California, San Francisco, California), for providing gas phase calibration standards for isoflurane and 1,2-dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane.
1. Chortkoff BS, Bennett HL, Eger EI II: Subanesthetic concentrations of isoflurane suppress learning as defined by the category-example task. Anesthesiology 1993; 79:16–22
2. Gonsowski CT, Chortkoff BS, Eger EI II, Bennett HL, Weiskopf RB: Subanesthetic concentrations of desflurane and isoflurane suppress explicit and implicit learning. Anesth Analg 1995; 80:568–72
3. El Zahaby HM, Ghoneim MM, Johnson GM, Gormezano I: Effects of subanesthetic concentrations of isoflurane and their interactions with epinephrine on acquisition and retention of the rabbit nictitating membrane response. Anesthesiology 1994; 81:229–37
4. Sonner JM, Li JA, Eger EI: Desflurane and the nonimmobilizer 1,2- dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane suppress learning by a mechanism independent of the level of unconditioned stimulation. Anesth Analg 1998; 87:200–5
5. Dwyer R, Bennett HL, Eger EI II, Heilbron D: Effects of isoflurane and nitrous oxide in subanesthetic concentrations on memory and responsiveness in volunteers. Anesthesiology 1992; 77:888–98
6. Alkire MT, Gorski LA: Relative amnesic potency of five inhalational anesthetics follows the Meyer-Overton rule. Anesthesiology 2004; 101:417–29
7. Kandel L, Chortkoff BS, Sonner J, Laster MJ, Eger EI II: Nonanesthetics can suppress learning. Anesth Analg 1996; 82:321–6
8. Dutton RC, Maurer AJ, Sonner JM, Fanselow MS, Laster MJ, Eger EI: Short-term memory resists the depressant effect of the nonimmobilizer 1-2-dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane (2N) more than long-term memory. Anesth Analg 2002; 94:631–9
9. Bland BH: The physiology and pharmacology of hippocampal-formation theta rhythms. Prog Neurobiol 1986; 26:1–54
10. Arnolds DE, Lopes da Silva FH, Aitink JW, Kamp A, Boeijinga P: The spectral properties of hippocampal EEG related to behaviour in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1980; 50:324–8
11. Winson J: Loss of hippocampal theta rhythm results in spatial memory deficit in rat. Science 1978; 201:160–3
12. Vertes RP, Kocsis B: Brainstem-diencephalo-septohippocampal systems controlling the theta rhythm of the hippocampus. Neuroscience 1997; 81:893–926
13. Kahana MJ, Seelig D, Madsen JR: Theta returns. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2001; 11:739–44
14. Jellema T, Weijnen JA: A slim needle-shaped multiwire microelectrode for intracerebral recording. J Neurosci Methods 1991; 40:203–9
15. Kramis R, Vanderwolf CH, Bland BH: Two types of hippocampal rhythmical slow activity in both the rabbit and the rat: Relations to behavior and effects of atropine, diethyl ether, urethane, and pentobarbital. Exp Neurol 1975; 49:58–85
16. Vanderwolf CH: Hippocampal electrical activity and voluntary movement in the rat. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1969; 26:407–18
17. Vertes RP: Hippocampal theta rhythm: A tag for short-term memory. Hippocampus 2005; 15:923–35
18. Vertes RP, Hoover WB, Viana DP: Theta rhythm of the hippocampus: Subcortical control and functional significance. Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev 2004; 3:173–200
19. Whishaw IQ: Hippocampal electroencephalographic activity in mongolian gerbil during natural behaviors and wheel running and in rat during wheel running and conditioned immobility. Can J Psychol 1972; 26:219–39
20. Dutton RC, Maurer AJ, Sonner JM, Fanselow MS, Laster MJ, Eger EI II: The concentration of isoflurane required to suppress learning depends on the type of learning. Anesthesiology 2001; 94:514–9
21. Rudolph U, Crestani F, Benke D, Brunig I, Benson JA, Fritschy JM, Martin JR, Bluethmann H, Mohler H: Benzodiazepine actions mediated by specific gamma-aminobutyric acid(A) receptor subtypes. Nature 1999; 401:796–800
22. Harrison NL, Kugler JL, Jones MV, Greenblatt EP, Pritchett DB: Positive modulation of human GABAA and glycine receptors by the inhalation anesthetic isoflurane. Mol Pharmacol 1993; 44:628–32
23. Mihic SJ, McQuilkin SJ, Eger EI II, Ionescu P, Harris RA: Potentiation of gamma-aminobutyric acid type a receptor-mediated chloride currents by novel halogenated compounds correlates with their abilities to induce general anesthesia. Mol Pharmacol 1994; 46:851–7
24. Zarnowska ED, Pearce RA, Saad AA, Perouansky M: The gamma-subunit governs the susceptibility of recombinant gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptors to block by the nonimmobilizer 1,2-dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane (F6, 2N). Anesth Analg 2005; 101:401–6
25. Perouansky M, Pearce RA: Effects on synaptic inhibition in the hippocampus do not underlie the amnestic and convulsive properties of the nonimmobilizer 1,2 dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane (F6). Anesthesiology 2004; 101:66–74
26. Caraiscos VB, Newell JG, You T, Elliott EM, Rosahl TW, Wafford KA, MacDonald JF, Orser BA: Selective enhancement of tonic GABAergic inhibition in murine hippocampal neurons by low concentrations of the volatile anesthetic isoflurane. J Neurosci 2004; 24:8454–8
27. Cheng VY, Martin LJ, Elliott EM, Kim JH, Mount HT, Taverna FA, Roder JC, MacDonald JF, Bhambri A, Collinson N, Wafford KA, Orser BA: Alpha5GABAA receptors mediate the amnestic but not sedative-hypnotic effects of the general anesthetic etomidate. J Neurosci 2006; 26:3713–20
28. Eger EI, Xing Y, Pearce R, Shafer S, Laster MJ, Zhang Y, Fanselow MS, Sonner JM: Isoflurane antagonizes the capacity of flurothyl or 1,2-dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane to impair fear conditioning to context and tone. Anesth Analg 2003; 96:1010–8
29. Burgess N, Maguire EA, O'Keefe J: The human hippocampus and spatial and episodic memory. Neuron 2002; 35:625–41
30. Shin J, Kim D, Bianchi R, Wong RK, Shin HS: Genetic dissection of theta rhythm heterogeneity in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005; 102:18165–70
31. Bland BH, Oddie SD: Theta band oscillation and synchrony in the hippocampal formation and associated structures: The case for its role in sensorimotor integration. Behav Brain Res 2001; 127:119–36
32. Kirk N, McNaughton IJ: Mapping the differential-effects of procaine on frequency and amplitude of reticularly elicited hippocampal rhythmical slow activity. Hippocampus 1993; 3:517–26
33. Lawson VH, Bland BH: The role of the septohippocampal pathway in the regulation of hippocampal field activity and behavior: Analysis by the intraseptal microinfusion of carbachol, atropine, and procaine. Exp Neurol 1993; 120:132–44
34. McNaughton N, Logan B, Panickar KS, Kirk IJ, Pan WX, Brown NT, Heenan A: Contribution of synapses in the medial supramammillary nucleus to the frequency of hippocampal theta rhythm in freely moving rats. Hippocampus 1995; 5:534–45
35. Mizumori SJ, Perez GM, Alvarado MC, Barnes CA, McNaughton BL: Reversible inactivation of the medial septum differentially affects two forms of learning in rats. Brain Res 1990; 528:12–20
36. M'Harzi M, Jarrard LE: Effects of medial and lateral septal lesions on acquisition of a place and cue radial maze task. Behav Brain Res 1992; 49:159–65
37. Givens BS, Olton DS: Cholinergic and GABAergic modulation of medial septal area: Effect on working memory. Behav Neurosci 1990; 104:849–55
38. Brioni JD, Decker MW, Gamboa LP, Izquierdo I, McGaugh JL: Muscimol injections in the medial septum impair spatial learning. Brain Res 1990; 522:227–34
39. Banks MI, Pearce RA: Dual actions of volatile anesthetics on GABA(A) IPSCs: Dissociation of blocking and prolonging effects. Anesthesiology 1999; 90:120–34
40. Burkat PM, Perouansky M, Pearce RA: Mutation of a putative anesthetic binding site prevents F6 enhancement of GABA-gated currents. Anesthesiology 2006; 105:1113
41. Mody I, Pearce RA: Diversity of inhibitory neurotransmission through GABA(A) receptors. Trends Neurosci 2004; 27:569–75
42. Wan RQ, Givens BS, Olton DS: Opioid modulation of working-memory: Intraseptal, but not intraamygdaloid, infusions of beta-endorphin impair performance in spatial alternation. Neurobiol Learning Memory 1995; 63:74–86
43. Sonner J, Li J, Eger EI: Desflurane and nitrous oxide, but not nonimmobilizers, affect nociceptive responses. Anesth Analg 1998; 86:629–34
44. Lee MG, Chrobak JJ, Sik A, Wiley RG, Buzsaki G: Hippocampal theta activity following selective lesion of the septal cholinergic system. Neuroscience 1994; 62:1033–47
45. Golebiewski H, Eckersdorf B, Konopacki J: Septal cholinergic mediation of hippocampal theta in the cat. Brain Res Bull 2002; 58:323–35
46. Minami K, Vanderah TW, Minami M, Harris RA: Inhibitory effects of anesthetics and ethanol on muscarinic receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes. Eur J Pharmacol 1997; 339:237–44
47. Nietgen GW, Honemann CW, Chan CK, Kamatchi GL, Durieux ME: Volatile anaesthetics have differential effects on recombinant M1 and M3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor function. Br J Anaesth 1998; 81:569–77
48. Pan WX, McNaughton N: The medial supramammillary nucleus, spatial learning and the frequency of hippocampal theta activity. Brain Res 1997; 764:101–8
This article has been cited 5 time(s).
Suppressing the Mind: Anesthetic Modulation of Memory and ConsciousnessModulation of the Hippocampal theta-Rhythm as a Mechanism for Anesthetic-Induced AmnesiaSuppressing the Mind: Anesthetic Modulation of Memory and Consciousness
Suppressing the Mind: Anesthetic Modulation of Memory and ConsciousnessPropofol Amnesia - What is Going on in the Brain?Suppressing the Mind: Anesthetic Modulation of Memory and Consciousness
Anesthesia and AnalgesiaIsoflurane Anesthesia Does Not Satisfy the Homeostatic Need for Rapid Eye Movement SleepAnesthesia and Analgesia
Suppressing the Mind: Anesthetic Modulation of Memory and ConsciousnessLoss of Recall and the Hippocampal Circuit Effects Produced by AnestheticsSuppressing the Mind: Anesthetic Modulation of Memory and Consciousness
© 2007 American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc.
Publication of an advertisement in Anesthesiology Online does not constitute endorsement by the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc. or Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. of the product or service being advertised.