Classic Papers Revisited
Central Sensitization: Uncovering the Relation between Pain and Plasticity
Woolf, Clifford J. M.B., B.Ch., Ph.D., M.R.C.P.*
Evidence for a Central Component of Post-injury Pain Hypersensitivity. By Clifford J. Woolf. Nature 1983; 306:686–8. Reprinted with permission.
Noxious skin stimuli which are sufficiently intense to produce tissue injury, characteristically generate prolonged poststimulus sensory disturbances that include continuing pain, an increased sensitivity to noxious stimuli and pain following innocuous stimuli. This could result from either a reduction in the thresholds of skin nociceptors (sensitization) or an increase in the excitability of the central nervous system so that normal inputs now evoke exaggerated responses. Because sensitization of peripheral receptors occurs following injury, a peripheral mechanism is widely held to be responsible for postinjury hypersensitivity. To investigate this I have now developed an animal model where changes occur in the threshold and responsiveness of the flexor reflex following peripheral injury that are analogous to the sensory changes found in man. Electrophysiological analysis of the injury-induced increase in excitability of the flexion reflex shows that it in part arises from changes in the activity of the spinal cord. The long-term consequences of noxious stimuli result, therefore, from central as well as from peripheral changes.
Click on the links below to access all the ArticlePlus for this article.
Please note that ArticlePlus files may launch a viewer application outside of your web browser.
IN contrast to hypothesis-driven science, discovery science is an exploration of the unknown. There are no road maps from the National Institutes for Health, just narrow, twisting paths, many dead ends, and very occasionally, a totally unexpected byway. I am delighted to share here how I discovered the phenomenon of central sensitization in the early 1980s. On completion of my medical training and Ph.D. in South Africa, I was extremely fortunate to meet Patrick Wall, then one of the foremost neuroscientists of his era and the major driving force behind the emerging field of pain neurobiology (Patrick D. Wall, D.M., F.R.S., Professor, Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, University College London, England; 1925–2001). Pat invited me to join his laboratory at University College London, where he provided me with two of the greatest gifts any young scientist could ask for: an intellectually challenging environment where all was possible if only one tried hard enough in smart enough a way, and complete freedom to operate. Pat used single unit analysis of dorsal horn neurons to reveal their functional characteristics and, from this, constructed enormously insightful theories about the circuitry of the spinal cord and the mechanisms that drove pain. These essentially were that active inhibition from large fibers in the periphery or descending inputs from the brainstem turned off pain transmission in the spinal cord, whereas any reduction in the level of such inhibition, such as after nerve injury, turned it on—the spinal gate control hypothesis.1
The work was cutting-edge systems neurobiology, and while I eagerly learned the trade from a true master, I became increasingly concerned. The reason for this was essentially one of sampling. In any given experiment, one could maximally record from perhaps five of the many millions of neurons in the lumbar spinal cord, and each was different. Although there were overall patterns, some responded only to innocuous stimulation such as light touch, others only to intense pinch, and most to a combination of low- and high-intensity stimuli; the spatial extent and temporal properties differed considerably from cell to cell. How, I asked myself, would it ever be possible to decode these action potential patterns into meaningful messages related to the sensation of pain? Intracellular dye injection enabled the morphology of individual neurons to be mapped in exquisite detail,2
but I could detect no organizing principle other than the apparent uniqueness of each cell.
I realized that the overall function of the pain system would not likely emerge from studying one neuron at a time, no matter how many and for how long. What I thought I really needed to understand was the biologic significance of the bursts of action potentials that I was recording. How would I do this? I decided instead of recording from dorsal horn neurons, to record activity in flexor motor neurons. The reasoning was simple. The firing of these neurons in response to a peripheral stimulus leads to a clear unambiguous outcome, contraction of muscles that flex a limb. These motor neurons are the output of the flexion withdrawal reflex, and by recording from them, I could treat the spinal cord essentially as a black box. The withdrawal reflex is an integral part of the nocifensive response defined exactly 100 yr ago by Sherrington (Sir Charles Scott Sherrington, M.B., F.R.S., Professor, Department of Physiology, Oxford University, England; 1857–1952). When exposed to a noxious stimulus, we simultaneously experience an unpleasant sensation and withdraw from the stimulus. The threshold for activating pain and the withdrawal reflex are essentially identical, and in animal behavioral investigations as well as studies in human neonates, withdrawal responses are used as a surrogate for pain.
When I first recorded from rat flexor motor neurons, I was amazed to find that they had crisp high-threshold cutaneous receptive fields and seemed much more like “pain cells” than most in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord. I then set about systematically characterizing the response properties of biceps motor neurons, examining the location, intensity, and types of skin stimuli that activated the cells. I found that most cells responded only to pinch or noxious heat of one or more toes. Some, however, had very large receptive fields encompassing the whole leg and could be driven by innocuous mechanical stimuli. This was strange because the flexion withdrawal reflex is normally activated, like pain, only by noxious stimuli.3
It took me several months of recording to finally realize that all of the anomalous motor neurons with low-threshold receptive fields were only recorded at the end of the day, after the repeated noxious stimulation of the hind paw required for recording from many neurons. This was my “eureka” moment; cells with large low-threshold receptive fields were not a different class of neuron, but instead cells that had somehow changed as a result of the repeated input I had applied. This was, I appreciated immediately, a possible manifestation of functional plasticity of the central nervous system, and I was then able to show this definitively by recording for prolonged periods from single neurons and documenting that in the absence of injury, the receptive fields were stable, but peripheral injury induced profound alterations in their threshold and responsiveness. Moreover, once the injury had produced these alterations, local anesthesia to the site of the injury did not revert them. The changes outlasted the trigger. The discovery is described in my Nature
article of 1983, defining for the first time central sensitization.4
Imagine my excitement as a young, unknown scientist in getting a single-author article into Nature
It is difficult now to reconstruct our view of the nervous system as it was 23 yr ago, but it was then thought of as a hard-wired system whose connections and properties, once set up during development, remained essentially fixed. Synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus had been discovered, but was considered a specific mechanism related only to memory, and there was little sense of the dynamic, modifiable neuronal system we now appreciate. Because, I surmised, the trigger for the change in receptive field properties was repeated noxious input applied only to the toes, recruitment of receptive fields outside of this region, on the leg, for example, meant a change within the central nervous system and not an increased sensitivity of the peripheral terminals of sensory fibers innervating injured tissue—peripheral sensitization. Increased excitability triggered within the spinal cord by peripheral noxious inputs represented “central sensitization,” a state where the response to normal inputs was greatly enhanced (fig. 1
). A corollary of this was that pain does not simply reflect the presence, intensity, or duration of specific “pain” stimuli in the periphery but also changes in the function of the central nervous system.
I then showed with Pat Wall that a very brief (10- to 20-s) period of low-frequency stimulation of a nerve at C-fiber strength could trigger central sensitization for up to an hour, a central synaptic modification representing a kind of short-term pain memory, and that nerves innervating muscles and joints produced longer lasting changes than cutaneous nerves.5
I and my colleagues found similar changes in the receptive field properties of high-threshold dorsal horn neurons6
as those that I had first reported in motor neurons, and we showed that these were the result of the recruitment of normally subthreshold synaptic inputs.7
Central sensitization was, we found, a manifestation of activity-dependent plasticity due to an increase in synaptic strength, driven to a substantial extent, by N
-methyl-d-aspartic acid glutamatergic receptors.8
Since then, considerable work from my own and many other laboratories has shown that central sensitization operates after noxious stimuli, peripheral inflammation, and nerve injury in the spinal cord and higher brain centers, and involves multiple presynaptic and postsynaptic changes producing changes in transmitter release and action, as well as synthesis of novel neuromodulators such as prostaglandin E2.9,10
Many features of central sensitization resemble those that are responsible for memory.11
Central sensitization is produced not only by increases in excitability as originally discovered but also by a reduction in inhibitory transmission due to reduced synthesis or action of inhibitory transmitters and to a loss of inhibitory interneurons, which may produce a persistent enhancement of pain sensitivity12
We now appreciate that central sensitization is responsible for secondary hyperalgesia, the spread of tenderness or enhanced pain sensitivity outside of an area of injury, and tactile allodynia, pain in response to light touch, and is a common component of both inflammatory and neuropathic pain. Furthermore, we recognize that there are several clinical syndromes characterized by pain hypersensitivity in the absence of tissue injury, inflammation, or a lesion to the nervous system such as fibromyalgia, tension-type headache, or irritable bowel syndrome, where it seems as if an autonomous central sensitization drives the pain by a central amplification of peripheral inputs. The discovery of central sensitization also led to an appreciation that because injury triggered long-lasting changes at many levels in the central nervous system, it made sense to try adapt treatment strategies to prevent these—the concept of preemptive analgesia.13
Furthermore, central sensitization offered new targets for novel analgesic approaches, ones that do not ablate the painful response to a noxious stimulus (nociceptive pain) but instead normalize a hypersensitive pain system. Anticonvulsants, such as gabapentin or pregabalin, and drugs that block amine uptake, such as duloxetine, reduce central sensitization.
At the time I first discovered central sensitization, I had abandoned the bedside for the bench and was working purely to understand the operation of the nervous system and had no sense of the implications of the experimental observations I was making for patients. It has been very gratifying to contribute in some small way to both an increased understanding of pain and its management. Much remains still to be done; we need to understand what switches central sensitization on and off particularly in dysfunctional syndromes such as fibromyalgia, develop tools to identify those patients where central sensitization is the major driver of their pain, and of course discover more effective treatments that reduce central sensitization and do not produce adverse effects. I have greatly enjoyed exploring the secrets of central sensitization for more than 20 yr and have had the enormous privilege of sharing this voyage with many wonderful colleagues, all of whom I thank with great pleasure.
1. Melzack R, Wall PD: Pain mechanisms: A new theory. Science 1965; 150:971–9
2. Woolf CJ, Fitzgerald M: The properties of neurons recorded in the superficial dorsal horn of the rat spinal cord. J Comp Neurol 1983; 221:313–28
3. Woolf CJ, Swett JE: The cutaneous contribution to the hamstring flexor reflex in the rat: An electrophysiological and anatomical study. Brain Res 1984; 303:299–312
4. Woolf CJ: Evidence for a central component of post-injury pain hypersensitivity. Nature 1983; 306:686–8
5. Wall PD, Woolf CJ: Muscle but not cutaneous C-afferent input produces prolonged increases in the excitability of the flexion reflex in the rat. J Physiol 1984; 356:443–58
6. Cook AJ, Woolf CJ, Wall PD, McMahon SB: Dynamic receptive field plasticity in rat spinal cord dorsal horn following C primary afferent input. Nature 1987; 325:151–3
7. Woolf CJ, King AE: Dynamic alterations in the cutaneous mechanoreceptive fields of dorsal horn neurons in the rat spinal cord. J Neurosci 1990; 10:2717–26
8. Woolf CJ, Thompson SWN: The induction and maintenance of central sensitization is dependent on N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptor activation: Implications for the treatment of post-injury pain hypersensitivity states. Pain 1991; 44:293–9
9. Woolf CJ, Salter MW: Neuronal plasticity: Increasing the gain in pain. Science 2000; 288:1765–8
10. Samad TA, Moore KA, Sapirstein A, Billet S, Allchorne A, Poole S, Bonventre JV, Woolf CJ: Interleukin-1-mediated induction of Cox-2 in the CNS contributes to inflammatory pain hypersensitivity. Nature 2001; 410:471–5
11. Ji RR, Kohno T, Moore KA, Woolf CJ: Central sensitization and LTP: Do pain and memory share similar mechanisms? Trends Neurosci 2003; 26:696–705
12. Scholz J, Broom DC, Youn DH, Mills, CD, Kohno T, Suter MR, Moore KA, Decosterd I, Coggeshall RE, Woolf CJ: Blocking caspase activity prevents transsynaptic neuronal apoptosis and the loss of inhibition in lamina II of the dorsal horn after peripheral nerve injury. J Neurosci 2005; 25:7317–23
13. Woolf CJ, Chong M-S: Pre-emptive analgesia: Treating postoperative pain by preventing the establishment of central sensitization. Anesth Analg 1993; 77:1–18
This article has been cited 36 time(s).
American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory Integrative and Comparative PhysiologyCalcium/calmodulin-dependent kinase II mediates NO-elicited PKG activation to participate in spinal reflex potentiation in anesthetized ratsAmerican Journal of Physiology-Regulatory Integrative and Comparative Physiology
PainWhen is an analgesic not an analgesic?Pain
NeuroscienceA Cyclic Peptide Targeted Against Psd-95 Blocks Central Sensitization and Attenuates Thermal HyperalgesiaNeuroscience
European Journal of CancerChallenges in cancer pain management-bone painEuropean Journal of Cancer
American Journal of Physiology-Renal PhysiologyTRPV1 mediates the uterine capsaicin-induced NMDA NR2B-dependent cross-organ reflex sensitization in anesthetized ratsAmerican Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology
Brain ResearchPeripheral neuritis and increased spinal cord neurochemicals are induced in a model of repetitive motion injury with low force and repetition exposureBrain Research
Nature Clinical Practice NeurologyInfant pain management: a developmental neurobiological approachNature Clinical Practice Neurology
PainColon mustard oil instillation induced cross-organ reflex sensitization on the pelvic-urethra reflex activity in ratsPain
Experimental NeurologyRole of the spinal cord NR2B-containing NMDA receptors in the development of neuropathic painExperimental Neurology
PainUnity vs. diversity of neuropathic pain mechanisms: Allodynia and hyperalgesia in rats selected for heritable predisposition to spontaneous painPain
American Journal of Physiology-Renal PhysiologyEndogenous ephrinB2 mediates colon-urethra cross-organ sensitization via Src kinase-dependent tyrosine phosphorylation of NR2BAmerican Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology
American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and MetabolismEstrous cycle variation of TRPV1-mediated cross-organ sensitization between uterus and NMDA-dependent pelvic-urethra reflex activityAmerican Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism
Annals of Thoracic SurgeryThoracoscopic Chest Wall Resection: What Is Its Role?Annals of Thoracic Surgery
American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and MetabolismOrexin-A modulates glutamatergic NMDA-dependent spinal reflex potentiation via inhibition of NR2B subunitAmerican Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism
Pediatric AnesthesiaTransverse abdominis plane block: a new approach to the management of secondary hyperalgesia following major abdominal surgeryPediatric Anesthesia
Journal of PainsiRNA-Mediated Knockdown of the NR1 Subunit Gene of the NMDA Receptor Attenuates Formalin-Induced Pain Behaviors in Adult RatsJournal of Pain
PainBrief, low frequency stimulation of rat peripheral C-fibres evokes prolonged microglial-induced central sensitization in adults but not in neonatesPain
Analgesia before, during and after surgery: prevention of postoperative pain
Minerva Anestesiologica, 73():
European Journal of PainUpregulation and redistribution of ephrinB and EphB receptor in dorsal root ganglion and spinal dorsal horn neurons after peripheral nerve injury and dorsal rhizotomyEuropean Journal of Pain
Experimental NeurologyContribution of the spinal cord BDNF to the development of neuropathic pain by activation of the NR2B-containing NMDA receptors in rats with spinal nerve ligationExperimental Neurology
American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and MetabolismEstrogen-dependent facilitation on spinal reflex potentiation involves the Cdk5/ERK1/2/NR2B cascade in anesthetized ratsAmerican Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental TherapeuticsAcute Inhibition of Ca2+/Calmodulin-Dependent Protein Kinase II Reverses Experimental Neuropathic Pain in MiceJournal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
Journal of PainCentral Sensitization: A Generator of Pain Hypersensitivity by Central Neural PlasticityJournal of Pain
UrologySensory Perception Thresholds in Men With Chronic Pelvic Pain SyndromeUrology
Molecular PainTargeted mutation of EphB1 receptor prevents development of neuropathic hyperalgesia and physical dependence on morphine in miceMolecular Pain
PainEphrinB-EphB receptor signaling contributes to neuropathic pain by regulating neural excitability and spinal synaptic plasticity in ratsPain
LungBasic mechanisms of cough: Current understanding and remaining questionsLung
NeuroscienceInflammatory pain-induced signaling events following a conditional deletion of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor in spinal cord dorsal hornNeuroscience
Respiratory Physiology & NeurobiologyAirway nerves and dyspnea associated with inflammatory airway diseaseRespiratory Physiology & Neurobiology
Journal of NeuroscienceChanges in Membrane Excitability and Potassium Currents in Sensitized Dorsal Horn Neurons of Mice PupsJournal of Neuroscience
American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver PhysiologyCystitis increases colorectal afferent sensitivity in the mouseAmerican Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology
Journal of NeurochemistryPI3K modulates estrogen-dependent facilitation of colon-to-urethra cross-organ reflex sensitization in ovariectomized female ratsJournal of Neurochemistry
Journal of PainSex, Gender, and Pain: A Review of Recent Clinical and Experimental FindingsJournal of Pain
The Clinical Journal of PainA Prospective Study of Risk Factors for Pain Persisting 4 Months After HysterectomyThe Clinical Journal of Pain
The Clinical Journal of PainGeneralized Mechanical Pain Sensitivity Over Nerve Tissues in Patients With Strictly Unilateral MigraineThe Clinical Journal of Pain
Current Opinion in AnesthesiologyMultimodal analgesia for controlling acute postoperative painCurrent Opinion in Anesthesiology
Supplemental Digital Content
© 2007 American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc.
Publication of an advertisement in Anesthesiology Online does not constitute endorsement by the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc. or Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. of the product or service being advertised.
- Articles in PubMed by Clifford J. Woolf, M.B., B.Ch., Ph.D., M.R.C.P.
- This article in PubMed
- Articles in Google Scholar by Clifford J. Woolf, M.B., B.Ch., Ph.D., M.R.C.P.
- Other articles in this journal by Clifford J. Woolf, M.B., B.Ch., Ph.D., M.R.C.P.