Skip Navigation LinksHome > February 2007 - Volume 106 - Issue 2 > Sevoflurane Inhalation at Sedative Concentrations Provides E...
Clinical Investigations

Sevoflurane Inhalation at Sedative Concentrations Provides Endothelial Protection against Ischemia–Reperfusion Injury in Humans

Lucchinetti, Eliana Ph.D.*; Ambrosio, Sandro†; Aguirre, José M.D.‡; Herrmann, Patrick M.D.§; Härter, Luc Ph.D.∥; Keel, Marius M.D.#; Meier, Thomas M.D.**; Zaugg, Michael M.D.††

Free Access
Article Outline
Collapse Box

Author Information

Collapse Box


Background: Endothelial cells can be protected against cytokine-induced toxicity by volatile anesthetics. The authors tested whether inhalation of sevoflurane at subanesthetic concentrations provides protection against postocclusive endothelial dysfunction induced by ischemia–reperfusion injury of the forearm in humans.
Methods: Five healthy male volunteers were enrolled in this study with crossover design. Each subject was randomly exposed to 15 min of forearm ischemia in the presence or absence of sevoflurane. Sevoflurane was inhaled at 0.5–1 vol% end-tidal concentrations from 15 min before ischemia until 5 min after the onset of reperfusion. Hyperemic reaction, an indicator of ischemic injury and endothelial function, was determined at 15 and 30 min of reperfusion using venous occlusion plethysmography. Also, markers of leukocyte activation (CD11b, CD42b) were measured by flow cytometry during reperfusion.
Results: Fifteen minutes of forearm ischemia followed by reperfusion diminished postocclusive endothelium-dependent hyperemic reaction at 15 and 30 min of reperfusion. Peri-ischemic inhalation of sevoflurane, targeted at 0.5–1 vol% end-tidal concentrations, markedly improved postocclusive hyperemic reaction. In addition, inhalation of sevoflurane attenuated activation of leukocytes, as measured by CD11b expression, after ischemia–reperfusion injury. No changes in CD42b expression were observed after ischemia–reperfusion of the forearm.
Conclusions: These data suggest that human endothelium, a key component of all vital organs, is receptive to protection by sevoflurane in vivo. Peri-ischemic administration of sevoflurane mimics a combination of pharmacologic preconditioning and postconditioning and protects at even low sedative concentrations (< 1 vol%). Inhibition of leukocyte adhesion is likely to be involved in the protection.
VOLATILE anesthetics protect against ischemia–reperfusion injury and reduce myocardial infarct size.1,2 This protection is thought to be due to pharmacologic preconditioning and postconditioning.3–5 So far, several clinical studies in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery have shown cardioprotection by volatile anesthetics.6,7 A double-blinded placebo-controlled trial in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery demonstrated not only a decrease of postoperative myocardial dysfunction but also attenuation of renal damage implying “multiorgan” protection by these agents.6 Interestingly, decreased expression of platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule 1, an adhesion molecule responsible for endothelial migration of leukocytes, was found to be reduced in atrial biopsies of sevoflurane-preconditioned patients and was associated with improved event-free long-term survival.8
Vascular endothelium is critically involved in many steps of tissue damage originating from ischemia–reperfusion.9,10 Intact vascular endothelium is essential in maintaining arterial tone and coagulation status. Because human endothelium can be protected against ischemia–reperfusion by ischemic10,11 and pharmacologic12 preconditioning and postconditioning and is ubiquitous in the vasculature of all tissues, it has been speculated that endothelial protection may play a central role in the observed “multiorgan” protection by volatile anesthetics.8 So far, it has been shown experimentally that human endothelial cells exposed to volatile anesthetics developed a pronounced resistance against cytokine-induced toxicity, consistent with a preconditioning-like effect.13 However, it is unclear whether endothelial protection by volatile anesthetics also occurs against ischemia–reperfusion injury in vivo in humans. To address this important question, we used an established model of endothelial dysfunction after sustained forearm ischemia.10,14 In these studies, it has been clearly demonstrated that ischemia–reperfusion injury, as reflected by reduced postocclusive forearm blood flow, is exclusively due to endothelial dysfunction.
Here, we demonstrate that sevoflurane inhalation at subanesthetic concentrations preserves postocclusive blood flow, representing the first in vivo human evidence of endothelial protection against ischemia–reperfusion injury by volatile anesthetics. Future studies should confirm our results in diseased elderly patients under clinical conditions.
Back to Top | Article Outline

Materials and Methods

Five healthy male volunteers aged 30 ± 7 (23–43) yr with a body mass index of 25 ± 3 (22–27) kg/m2 gave informed signed consent and participated in this study with crossover design. All participants were nonsmokers and refrained from caffeine and black chocolate for 24 h. The subjects fasted overnight and took a single dose of oral ranitidine (300 mg) the evening before participation. Each subject underwent the same experimental protocol with and without sevoflurane at least 7 days apart. The research was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (2000). The study was approved by the local ethics committee of the University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Back to Top | Article Outline
Study Protocols
Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Image Tools
Figure 1 summarizes the two protocols of this crossover study. Ischemia–reperfusion of the forearm was used as a model of endothelial dysfunction.10,14 An intravenous line was placed in a large cubital vein of the nondominant arm, and 500 ml lactated Ringer’s solution was infused to correct for the fluid deficit. Odansetron (0.5 mg) was administered intravenously to decrease the risk of nausea and vomiting independent of whether sevoflurane was inhaled. Studies were performed in a temperature-controlled and quiet room (24°C) during the early morning hours. The nondominant forearm was rendered ischemic for 15 min by inflating a 12-cm-wide blood pressure cuff placed around the upper arm to 180 mmHg to induce endothelial dysfunction (test ischemia). In the protocol with sevoflurane inhalation, sevoflurane in 50% oxygen was inhaled by the spontaneously breathing volunteers using a tight facemask connected to the common gas outlet of an anesthesia machine (Siemens Servo 900D ventilator; Siemens Life Support Systems, Sona, Sweden) to achieve an end-tidal concentration between 0.5 and 1.0 vol%. Previous studies reported loss of consciousness with sevoflurane inhalation at approximately 1 vol% end-tidal concentration.15 At the end of each protocol, 0.4 mg sublingual nitroglycerin was administered to assess endothelium-independent dilation 3 min after nitroglycerin intake. Blood samples were taken from a cubital vein of the nondominant arm before test ischemia (baseline) and after 2, 5, and 10 min of reperfusion. Monitoring consisted of intermittent noninvasive blood pressure measurements, five-lead electrocardiogram, end-tidal carbon dioxide and sevoflurane concentrations (Hellige VICOM-SM SMU 612; PPG, Freiburg, Germany), and Bispectral Index (A2000 monitor® with three adhesive electrodes to the forehead, single channel: Fp1–Fpz, version 3.3; Aspect Medical Systems, Inc., Natick, MA) for depth of sedation.
Back to Top | Article Outline
Assessment of Resistance Vessel Endothelial Function Using Hyperemic Blood Flow Response in the Forearm
Study subjects were positioned comfortably on a bed in a supine position with a slight elevation of the head and with both arms extended (45° abducted) and elevated above the level of the right atrium to ensure complete and rapid venous return to the heart. Mercury-in-silastic strain-gauge venous occlusion plethysmography (Vasoquant 4000; ELCAT GmbH, Wolfratshausen, Germany) was used to measure forearm blood flow. Strain-gauges were positioned tightly around the largest circumferences of the forearms. Venous congestion was achieved by inflating a cuff around the upper arm to 40 mmHg. The recording period of blood flow consisted of four cycles of venous occlusion followed by deflation (each 5 s). Reactive hyperemia was induced by 4 min of blood flow arrest to the forearm by inflating the blood pressure cuff placed around the upper arm 20 mmHg above the systolic blood pressure. Hyperemic reaction was divided into an early hyperemic reaction (EHR) reflecting peak flow at the onset of reperfusion (first measurement after deflation of cuff), and late hyperemic reaction (LHR) reflecting maintenance of hyperemia (mean of the three subsequent measurements). Previous studies showed that hyperemic blood flow regains basal conditions approximately 40–60 s after a 4-min occlusion period.16 Reactive hyperemia was determined at baseline before test ischemia on the dominant forearm (to avoid inadvertent ischemic preconditioning), 15 min after test ischemia on the nondominant ischemic forearm, and 30 min after test ischemia on both forearms (fig. 1). During recording, the hands were excluded from the circulation by inflation of wrist cuffs to 220 mmHg to minimize the contribution of the hand skin flow.
Back to Top | Article Outline
Determination of CD11b and CD42b Expression in Leukocytes Using Flow Cytometry
CD11b expression is an indicator of neutrophil activation, whereas CD42b expression on leukocytes indicates formation of leukocyte–thrombocyte complexes. CD11b and CD42b were determined as previously described.10 Collected blood samples were immediately processed for flow cytometry. Heparinized blood (50 μl) was incubated with antibody solution for 10 min at room temerature. FACS lysing solution (450 μl; Becton Dickinson, Basel, Switzerland) was added and incubated for 20 min. Samples were fixed by adding 500 μl 0.2% formaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline for 30 min. The FACSCalibur (Becton Dickinson) flow cytometer was used to measure R-phycoerythrin (PE) fluorescence at 580 nm and fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) fluorescence at 515 nm. Leukocytes were distinguished from each other by typical physical characteristics, resulting in well-delineated cellular subpopulations that are easily identified on forward and side-scatter plots. Monoclonal antibodies for polymorphonuclear granulocytes (CD15, PE-labeled, clone 80H5, Immunotech, Marseille, France) and monocytes (CD14, FITC-labeled, clone 61D3; eBioscience, Wembley, United Kingdom) further served for identification of cellular subgroups. CD11b and CD42b expression were measured by fluorescence intensity of PE-conjugated and FITC-labeled monoclonal antibodies directed against CD11b (PE-labeled, clone 2LPM19C; DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark) and CD42b (FITC-labeled, clone AN51; DAKO). Results were compared with isotype-matched antibodies staining as controls (PE-labeled immunoglobulin G; eBioscience, and FITC-labeled immunoglobulin G; Becton Dickinson). A minimum of 20,000 events was counted on each sample.
Back to Top | Article Outline
Statistical Analysis
Equation (Uncited)
Equation (Uncited)
Image Tools
Data are given as mean ± SD. Forearm blood flow was measured in milliliters per 100 g tissue per minute and expressed as percent change compared with baseline flow measurements. For each participating subject, activation of leukocytes on the ischemic limb was expressed as the ratio of CD11b mean fluorescence intensities (MFIs) between time-matched control and sevoflurane blood samples as follows:
where i = 1, 2, …, 5 and j = baseline, 2 min, 5 min, 10 min.
Subsequently, data were normalized to baseline. Paired t test and repeated-measures analysis of variance were used for comparison. P < 0.05 was considered significant. Analyses were performed using SigmaStat Version 2 (SPSS Science, Chicago, IL).
Back to Top | Article Outline


Table 1
Table 1
Image Tools
All study subjects tolerated the procedure without complications, except for one experiencing transient nausea without vomiting. Pain caused by the 15 min of forearm ischemia was rated as 2–3 on a visual analog scale by all participants in the protocol without sevoflurane inhalation as opposed to 0 on the visual analog scale in the protocol with sevoflurane inhalation. The 15 min of test ischemia and inhalation of sedative concentrations of sevoflurane had only marginal effects on blood pressure and end-tidal carbon dioxide concentrations (table 1). All participants responded to verbal commands and could be easily aroused on tactile stimulation. None of them experienced an excitement phase during sedation.
Back to Top | Article Outline
Sustained Ischemia Followed by Reperfusion Deteriorates Endothelium-dependent Hyperemic Reaction in the Forearm
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Image Tools
A test ischemia of 15 min on the forearm was used to elicit endothelial dysfunction. Hyperemic blood flow response was determined using venous occlusion plethysmography after 15 and 30 min of reperfusion on the ischemic (nondominant) side and after 30 min of reperfusion on the control arm. EHR (peak flow at reopening of the forearm vessels) was unaffected by test ischemia, whereas LHR (maintenance of hyperemic reaction) was markedly diminished (percent change from baseline at 15 min: −38 ± 18%, P = 0.01; percent change from baseline at 30 min: −32 ± 13%, P = 0.006; figs. 2A and B). Administration of sublingual nitroglycerin did not reverse the impairment in forearm blood flow (P = 0.55), indicating postocclusive endothelium-dependent but smooth muscle–independent dysfunction in vasomotion. Hyperemic blood flow response was unaffected by test ischemia on the control (nonischemic, dominant) arm (data not shown).
Back to Top | Article Outline
Sevoflurane Inhalation Potentiates Endothelium-dependent Hyperemic Reaction
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Image Tools
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Image Tools
Each subject underwent the same study protocol with and without sevoflurane inhalation. Sevoflurane inhalation was initiated 15 min before the onset of test ischemia and was maintained throughout the first 5 min of reperfusion (fig. 1). Thus, the total time of sevoflurane administration was 35 min. There was no consistent improvement of EHR after sevoflurane inhalation (fig. 2A). However, sevoflurane administration consistently and markedly improved LHR after test ischemia (figs. 2B and 3). Likewise, sevoflurane inhalation enhanced LHR but not EHR on the nonischemic arm 25 min after cessation of sevoflurane inhalation (fig. 4). Notably, end-tidal concentrations, as measured after deeply exhaling, were 0% in all subjects 10 and 25 min after cessation of sevoflurane inhalation. Sublingual administration of nitroglycerin did not affect forearm perfusion (P = 0.95), pointing to the importance of endothelium-dependent vasomotion in the model used. Collectively, sevoflurane efficaciously protects the endothelium against ischemia–reperfusion injury.
Back to Top | Article Outline
Sevoflurane Inhalation Attenuates Activation of Leukocytes after Ischemia–Reperfusion Injury
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Image Tools
To elucidate possible mechanisms underlying the protection by sevoflurane, we determined the expression of CD11b and CD42b from forearm blood samples of the ischemic side. Activation of leukocytes on the ischemic limb was expressed as the ratio of CD11b mean fluorescence intensities between time-matched control and sevoflurane blood samples. Sevoflurane administration reduced the ratio by more than 50% at 2, 5, and 10 min of reperfusion in granulocytes (P = 0.002) and monocytes (P = 0.005) indicating a marked reduction in CD11b expression by sevoflurane during reperfusion (fig. 5). No changes in the percentages of CD11b expressing granulocytes or monocytes were observed during reperfusion. In contrast to the surface marker CD11b, no alterations in CD42b expression or in the percentage of CD42b-positive granulocytes or monocytes (leukocyte–platelet complexes) were detected (data not shown).
Back to Top | Article Outline
Sevoflurane Provides Endothelial Protection at Sedative (Subanesthetic) Concentrations (< 1 vol% End-tidal)
Sevoflurane was administered to the study subjects to obtain an end-tidal concentration between 0.5 and 1 vol% (table 1). All participants responded to verbal commands and exhibited arousal in response to tactile stimulation compatible with a mean Bispectral Index value of 74 (table 1), but experienced amnesia for the entire duration of sevoflurane inhalation. Importantly, sevoflurane at even low subanesthetic concentrations provided endothelial protection.
Back to Top | Article Outline


This study shows for the first time in humans in vivo that peri-ischemic sevoflurane inhalation attenuates ischemia–reperfusion injury of the endothelium, as assessed by hyperemic blood flow response and CD11b activation in the forearm. The second important finding of this study is that even subanesthetic concentrations of sevoflurane, which induced sedation in the participants (mean Bispectral Index ranging from 68 to 81), were efficacious to elicit protection. Finally, enhanced hyperemic reaction was observed on both sides, including the nonischemic forearm, providing evidence that sevoflurane acts systemically on the endothelium. Taken together, our data suggest that endothelial protection by sevoflurane may be possible to harness in unanesthetized but sedated subjects. Nevertheless, our results should be confirmed in diseased elderly patients under clinical conditions.
The current study used strain-gauge venous occlusion plethysmography to measure hyperemic blood flow response after prolonged test ischemia of the forearm. Venous occlusion plethysmography is a reliable noninvasive tool for investigating vascular function,17 and its reproducibility is excellent.18 The rate and swelling of the forearm during occlusion of venous return is used to assess the rate of arterial inflow, which is dependent on normal function of the endothelium. Reactive hyperemia in the peripheral arteries is mediated by the endothelial release of nitric oxide, and changes in vascular resistance and blood flow are largely attributable to the bioavailability of nitric oxide.19 Other vasodilators such as prostaglandins and adenosine may also contribute to reactive hyperemia.20 As reported previously,10 no effect of nitroglycerin on hyperemic reaction after prolonged test ischemia of the forearm was observed in our study, consistent with an endothelium-dependent but smooth muscle–independent vasomotion effect. Interestingly, EHR representing blood flow at the onset of vessel opening did not show consistent improvement after sevoflurane treatment as opposed to LHR. However, at very high flow rates typically occurring at the onset of hyperemia, arterial inflow may be impeded before the end of venous occlusion and may thus falsify the relation between the rate of increase in forearm volume and arterial flow. Also, EHR measurements may be more prone to technical artifacts such as brachial artery collapse because of the blood pressure cuff. Finally, we cannot completely rule out that with a higher number of participants, EHR might have become also significantly regulated after sevoflurane treatment. Irrespectively, our results clearly demonstrate marked improvement in LHR after peri-ischemic sevoflurane inhalation.
Back to Top | Article Outline
Mechanisms Underlying Endothelial Protection by Sevoflurane
Volatile anesthetics protect against ischemia–reperfusion. One suggested mechanism is the attenuation of leukocyte activation,21 a primary mediator of local and remote tissue damage after ischemia–reperfusion. Mobert et al. 22 simulated ischemia–reperfusion by incubating endothelial cells with H2O2 for activation. Immediate expression of adhesion molecules occurred, which was abrogated by isoflurane exposure.22 De Rossi et al.23 reported that isoflurane at 1 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) inhibited the activation of L-selectin, CD11a, and CD11b. Interestingly, although 0.5 MAC of isoflurane was unable to affect expression of CD11a/b, shedding of L-selectin, responsible for neutrophil tethering and rolling, was attenuated. Another in vitro study showed decreased expression of intercellular adhesion molecule 1 and E-selectin after tumor necrosis factor α stimulation in desflurane-treated human umbilical vein endothelial cells.24 Although we observed a reduction in CD11b expression in our study during reperfusion in the sevoflurane protocol, this reduction is unlikely to be the sole mechanism of protection. No significant changes in platelet–granulocyte or platelet–monocyte complexes were observed after forearm ischemia in our model. Hence, other mechanisms related to adenosine triphosphate–dependent potassium channels,3 G protein–coupled receptors,25,26 activation of protein kinase C,27 and reperfusion injury salvage kinases including protein kinase B and extracellular signal–regulated kinase might be involved in the observed protection. These signaling components are closely linked to the ability of volatile anesthetics to elicit pharmacologic preconditioning and postconditioning,28,29 and some of them have been already been demonstrated to be important in the endothelial protection by preconditioning of the forearm in healthy volunteers.12,14
Back to Top | Article Outline
Questioning the “1-MAC Dogma” of Organ Protection?
So far, most experimental and clinical studies showed organ protection with volatile anesthetics at concentrations of 1 MAC or higher. Using a cellular model of simulated ischemia, Zaugg et al.3 reported a concentration-dependent protection by isoflurane and sevoflurane in isolated rat ventricular myocytes. Isoflurane and sevoflurane at 0.5 MAC already elicited marked protection against ischemia, whereas 2 MAC did not provide better protection than 1.5 MAC. Obal et al.30 demonstrated the highest degree of protection by sevoflurane postconditioning with 1 MAC compared with 2 MAC in an in vivo rat model of regional ischemia of the heart. Interestingly, Morisaki et al.31 found an up-regulation of the deleterious P-selectin in rat mesenteric vessels in situ after increasing the sevoflurane concentration from 1 to 2 MAC, raising the possibility that leukocyte–endothelium interaction may be most favorably affected at lower rather than higher concentrations of volatile anesthetics. In our study, sevoflurane was titrated to a subanesthetic target end-tidal concentration between 0.5 and 1 vol%, and Bispectral Index was used as an additional indicator of depth of sedation. The observations in our study now provide evidence that the endothelium in man may be receptive to protection at concentrations well below 1 MAC.
Back to Top | Article Outline
Clinical Implications
Endothelial function is deteriorated in a wide range of conditions such as mental and physical stress, pain, diabetes mellitus, and arterial hypertension,32–34 which are associated with increased perioperative cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Reduced endothelial dilator function during ischemia–reperfusion may exacerbate vasospasm and thus is a critical early event of organ injury. The results of this study now imply that sevoflurane administration may protect endothelial function against ischemia–reperfusion and thereby increase postocclusive organ blood flow and tissue oxygenation. Because the endothelium is a key component in all body tissues, it can be speculated that sevoflurane inhalation may exert whole body protection. The fact that this protection can be achieved under conscious sedation further opens the possibility to use inhalational sedation during diagnostic and interventional procedures in cardiology or endovascular procedures of high-risk patients.
Back to Top | Article Outline
Limitations of the Study
We have carefully excluded confounding factors that may affect vasoreactivity, and a crossover study design was chosen to overcome interindividual variability. Nonetheless, the small sample size of the study may potentially infiltrate type I error. Moreover, the forearm ischemia model does not induce necrosis of endothelial cells, but rather a state of “endothelial stunning,” which resolves spontaneously within 60 min.35,36 Whether the observed protection is also effective in more substantial endothelial injury, particularly in patients with preexisting endothelial dysfunction, must be established. Also, it is unclear to what extent these results in the brachial vasculature can be extrapolated to the coronary vasculature. Finally, additional experiments are required to unravel the underlying mechanisms.
In conclusion, our data suggest that in man, the endothelium, a key component of all vital organs, is receptive to protection by sevoflurane at even low sedative concentrations (< 1 vol% end-tidal).
The authors thank Ursula Steckholzer, B.Sc. (Technician, Department of Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland), for her expert technical assistance as well as the postanesthesia care unit nurses, colleagues, and volunteers who participated in this study.
Back to Top | Article Outline


1. Warltier DC, al-Wathiqui MH, Kampine JP, Schmeling WT: Recovery of contractile function of stunned myocardium in chronically instrumented dogs is enhanced by halothane or isoflurane. Anesthesiology 1988; 69:552–65

2. Kersten JR, Schmeling TJ, Pagel PS, Gross GJ, Warltier DC: Isoflurane mimics ischemic preconditioning via activation of KATP channels: Reduction of myocardial infarct size with an acute memory phase. Anesthesiology 1997; 87:361–70

3. Zaugg M, Lucchinetti E, Spahn DR, Pasch T, Schaub MC: Volatile anesthetics mimic cardiac preconditioning by priming the activation of mitochondrial KATP channels via multiple signaling pathways. Anesthesiology 2002; 97:4–14

4. Chiari PC, Bienengraeber MW, Pagel PS, Krolikowski JG, Kersten JR, Warltier DC: Isoflurane protects against myocardial infarction during early reperfusion by activation of phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase signal transduction: Evidence for anesthetic-induced postconditioning in rabbits. Anesthesiology 2005; 102:102–9

5. Feng J, Lucchinetti E, Ahuja P, Pasch T, Perriard JC, Zaugg M: Isoflurane postconditioning prevents opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore through inhibition of glycogen synthase kinase 3β. Anesthesiology 2005; 103:987–95

6. Julier K, da Silva R, Garcia C, Bestmann L, Frascarolo P, Zollinger A, Chassot PG, Schmid ER, Turina MI, von Segesser LK, Pasch T, Spahn DR, Zaugg M: Preconditioning by sevoflurane decreases biochemical markers for myocardial and renal dysfunction in coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A double-blinded, placebo-controlled, multicenter study. Anesthesiology 2003; 98:1315–27

7. De Hert SG, Van der Linden PJ, Cromheecke S, Meeus R, Nelis A, Van Reeth V, ten Broecke PW, De Blier IG, Stockman BA, Rodrigus IE: Cardioprotective properties of sevoflurane in patients undergoing coronary surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass are related to the modalities of its administration. Anesthesiology 2004; 101:299–310

8. Garcia C, Julier K, Bestmann L, Zollinger A, von Segesser LK, Pasch T, Spahn DR, Zaugg M: Preconditioning with sevoflurane decreases PECAM-1 expression and improves one-year cardiovascular outcome in coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Br J Anaesth 2005; 94:159–65

9. Hearse DJ: Myocardial protection during ischemia and reperfusion. Mol Cell Biochem 1998; 186:177–84

10. Kharbanda RK, Peters M, Walton B, Kattenhorn M, Mullen M, Klein N, Vallance P, Deanfield J, MacAllister R: Ischemic preconditioning prevents endothelial injury and systemic neutrophil activation during ischemia-reperfusion in humans in vivo. Circulation 2001; 103:1624–30

11. Loukogeorgakis SP, Panagiotidou AT, Yellon DM, Deanfield JE, MacAllister RJ: Postconditioning protects against endothelial ischemia-reperfusion injury in the human forearm. Circulation 2006; 113:1015–9

12. Gori T, Sicuro S, Dragoni S, Donati G, Forconi S, Parker JD: Sildenafil prevents endothelial dysfunction induced by ischemia and reperfusion via opening of adenosine triphosphate-sensitive potassium channels: A human in vivo study. Circulation 2005; 111:742–6

13. de Klaver MJ, Buckingham MG, Rich GF: Isoflurane pretreatment has immediate and delayed protective effects against cytokine-induced injury in endothelial and vascular smooth muscle cells. Anesthesiology 2003; 99:896–903

14. Broadhead MW, Kharbanda RK, Peters MJ, MacAllister RJ: KATP channel activation induces ischemic preconditioning of the endothelium in humans in vivo. Circulation 2004; 110:2077–82

15. Kodaka M, Johansen JW, Sebel PS: The influence of gender on loss of consciousness with sevoflurane or propofol. Anesth Analg 2005; 101:377–81

16. Carlsson I, Sollevi A, Wennmalm A: The role of myogenic relaxation, adenosine and prostaglandins in human forearm reactive hyperaemia. J Physiol 1987; 389:147–61

17. Higashi Y, Sasaki S, Nakagawa K, Matsuura H, Kajiyama G, Oshima T: A noninvasive measurement of reactive hyperemia that can be used to assess resistance artery endothelial function in humans. Am J Cardiol 2001; 87:121–5

18. Thijssen DH, Bleeker MW, Smits P, Hopman MT: Reproducibility of blood flow and post-occlusive reactive hyperaemia as measured by venous occlusion plethysmography. Clin Sci (Lond) 2005; 108:151–7

19. Dakak N, Husain S, Mulcahy D, Andrews NP, Panza JA, Waclawiw M, Schenke W, Quyyumi AA: Contribution of nitric oxide to reactive hyperemia: Impact of endothelial dysfunction. Hypertension 1998; 32:9–15

20. Engelke KA, Halliwill JR, Proctor DN, Dietz NM, Joyner MJ: Contribution of nitric oxide and prostaglandins to reactive hyperemia in human forearm. J Appl Physiol 1996; 81:1807–14

21. Heindl B, Reichle FM, Zahler S, Conzen PF, Becker BF: Sevoflurane and isoflurane protect the reperfused guinea pig heart by reducing postischemic adhesion of polymorphonuclear neutrophils. Anesthesiology 1999; 91:521–30

22. Mobert J, Zahler S, Becker BF, Conzen PF: Inhibition of neutrophil activation by volatile anesthetics decreases adhesion to cultured human endothelial cells. Anesthesiology 1999; 90:1372–81

23. de Rossi LW, Horn NA, Buhre W, Gass F, Hutschenreuter G, Rossaint R: The effect of isoflurane on neutrophil selectin and beta(2)-integrin activation in vitro. Anesth Analg 2002; 95:583–7

24. Biao Z, Zhanggang X, Hao J, Changhong M, Jing C: The in vitro effect of desflurane preconditioning on endothelial adhesion molecules and mRNA expression. Anesth Analg 2005; 100:1007–13

25. Zaugg M, Lucchinetti E, Spahn DR, Pasch T, Garcia C, Schaub MC: Differential effects of anesthetics on mitochondrial KATP channel activity and cardiomyocyte protection. Anesthesiology 2002; 97:15–23

26. Hu G, Salem MR, Crystal GJ: Role of adenosine receptors in volatile anesthetic preconditioning against neutrophil-induced contractile dysfunction in isolated rat hearts. Anesthesiology 2005; 103:287–95

27. Uecker M, Da Silva R, Grampp T, Pasch T, Schaub MC, Zaugg M: Translocation of protein kinase C isoforms to subcellular targets in ischemic and anesthetic preconditioning. Anesthesiology 2003; 99:138–47

28. Tanaka K, Ludwig LM, Kersten JR, Pagel PS, Warltier DC: Mechanisms of cardioprotection by volatile anesthetics. Anesthesiology 2004; 100:707–21

29. Zaugg M, Lucchinetti E, Uecker M, Pasch T, Schaub MC: Anaesthetics and cardiac preconditioning: I. Signalling and cytoprotective mechanisms. Br J Anaesth 2003; 91:551–65

30. Obal D, Preckel B, Scharbatke H, Mullenheim J, Hoterkes F, Thamer V, Schlack W: One MAC of sevoflurane provides protection against reperfusion injury in the rat heart in vivo. Br J Anaesth 2001; 87:905–11

31. Morisaki H, Suematsu M, Wakabayashi Y, Moro-oka S, Fukushima K, Ishimura Y, Takeda J: Leukocyte-endothelium interaction in the rat mesenteric microcirculation during halothane or sevoflurane anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1997; 87:591–8

32. Ghiadoni L, Donald AE, Cropley M, Mullen MJ, Oakley G, Taylor M, O’Connor G, Betteridge J, Klein N, Steptoe A, Deanfield JE: Mental stress induces transient endothelial dysfunction in humans. Circulation 2000; 102:2473–8

33. Jambrik Z, Santarcangelo EL, Rudisch T, Varga A, Forster T, Carli G: Modulation of pain-induced endothelial dysfunction by hypnotisability. Pain 2005; 116:181–6

34. Sanada H, Higashi Y, Goto C, Chayama K, Yoshizumi M, Sueda T: Vascular function in patients with lower extremity peripheral arterial disease: A comparison of functions in upper and lower extremities. Atherosclerosis 2005; 178:179–85

35. Benjamin N, Calver A, Collier J, Robinson B, Vallance P, Webb D: Measuring forearm blood flow and interpreting the responses to drugs and mediators. Hypertension 1995; 25:918–23

36. Tousoulis D, Antoniades C, Stefanadis C: Evaluating endothelial function in humans: A guide to invasive and non-invasive techniques. Heart 2005; 91:553–8

Cited By:

This article has been cited 23 time(s).

Current Pharmaceutical Design
Therapy Against Ischemic Injury
Guarini, G; Huqi, A; Capozza, P; Morrone, D; Donati, F; Marzilli, M
Current Pharmaceutical Design, 19(): 4597-4621.

Anesthesia and Analgesia
Stem Cell-Like Human Endothelial Progenitors Show Enhanced Colony-Forming Capacity After Brief Sevoflurane Exposure: Preconditioning of Angiogenic Cells by Volatile Anesthetics
Lucchinetti, E; Zeisberger, SM; Baruscotti, I; Wacker, J; Feng, JH; Zaugg, K; Dubey, R; Zisch, AH; Zaugg, M
Anesthesia and Analgesia, 109(4): 1117-1126.
British Journal of Anaesthesia
Sevoflurane preserves the endothelial glycocalyx against ischaemia-reperfusion injury
Annecke, T; Chappell, D; Chen, C; Jacob, M; Welsch, U; Sommerhoff, CP; Rehm, M; Conzen, PF; Becker, BF
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 104(4): 414-421.
Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie
Intravenous administration of halogenated inhaled anesthetics-research tool or real application?
Raphael, J; Lynch, C
Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie, 56(2): 91-95.
British Journal of Anaesthesia
Is protection by inhalation agents volatile? Controversies in cardioprotection
Zaugg, M
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 99(5): 603-606.
British Journal of Anaesthesia
Sevoflurane but not propofol increases interstitial glycolysis metabolites availability during tourniquet-induced ischaemia-reperfusion
Carles, M; Dellamonica, J; Roux, J; Lena, D; Levraut, J; Pittet, JF; Boileau, P; Raucoules-Aime, M
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 100(1): 29-35.
Anesthesia and Analgesia
Delayed inhibition of agonist-induced granulocyte-platelet aggregation after low-dose sevoflurane inhalation in humans
Wacker, J; Lucchinetti, E; Jamnicki, M; Aguirre, J; Harter, L; Keel, M; Zaugg, M
Anesthesia and Analgesia, 106(6): 1749-1758.
Anesthesia and Analgesia
Molecular evidence of late preconditioning after sevoflurane inhalation in healthy volunteers
Lucchinetti, E; Aguirre, J; Feng, J; Zhu, M; Suter, M; Spahn, DR; Harter, L; Zaugg, M
Anesthesia and Analgesia, 105(3): 629-640.
Anesthesia for Free Vascularized Tissue Transfer
Hagau, N; Longrois, D
Microsurgery, 29(2): 161-167.
Anesthesia and Analgesia
Emulsified intravenous versus evaporated inhaled isoflurane for heart protection: Old wine in a new bottle or true innovation?
Lucchinetti, E; Schaub, MC; Zaugg, M
Anesthesia and Analgesia, 106(5): 1346-1349.
Anesthesia and Analgesia
Emulsified isoflurane produces cardiac protection after ischemia-reperfusion injury in rabbits
Rao, Y; Wang, YL; Zhang, WS; Liu, J
Anesthesia and Analgesia, 106(5): 1353-1359.
Lancet Neurology
Preconditioning and tolerance against cerebral ischaemia: from experimental strategies to clinical use
Dirnagl, U; Becker, K; Meisel, A
Lancet Neurology, 8(4): 398-412.

Anesthesia and Analgesia
Helium Breathing Provides Modest Antiinflammatory, but No Endothelial Protection Against Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Humans In Vivo
Lucchinetti, E; Wacker, J; Maurer, C; Keel, M; Harter, L; Zaugg, K; Zaugg, M
Anesthesia and Analgesia, 109(1): 101-108.
European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
Postconditioning: Current Controversies and Clinical Implications
Mockford, KA; Girn, HRS; Homer-Vanniasinkam, S
European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 37(4): 437-442.
Plos One
Desflurane Preconditioning Induces Oscillation of NF-kappa B in Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells
Yi, J; Zheng, YJ; Miao, CH; Tang, JG; Zhu, B
Plos One, 8(6): -.
ARTN e66576
Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
beta-Blockers and Volatile Anesthetics May Attenuate Cardioprotection by Remote Preconditioning in Adult Cardiac Surgery: A Meta-analysis of 15 Randomized Trials
Zhou, CH; Liu, Y; Yao, YT; Zhou, S; Fang, NX; Wang, WP; Li, LH
Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, 27(2): 305-311.
Journal of Translational Medicine
Effects of sevoflurane postconditioning on cell death, inflammation and TLR expression in human endothelial cells exposed to LPS
Rodriguez-Gonzalez, R; Baluja, A; Del Rio, SV; Rodriguez, A; Rodriguez, J; Taboada, M; Brea, D; Alvarez, J
Journal of Translational Medicine, 11(): -.
British Journal of Anaesthesia
Anaesthesia and intensive care management of face transplantation
Sedaghati-nia, A; Gilton, A; Liger, C; Binhas, M; Cook, F; Ait-Mammar, B; Scherrer, E; Hivelin, M; Lantieri, L; Marty, J; Plaud, B
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 111(4): 600-606.
Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
Myocardial Protection by Volatile Anesthetics in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: A Critical Review of the Laboratory and Clinical Evidence
Pagel, PS
Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, 27(5): 972-982.
Intermitted Pharmacologic Pretreatment by Xenon, Isoflurane, Nitrous Oxide, and the Opioid Morphine Prevents Tumor Necrosis Factor α–induced Adhesion Molecule Expression in Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells
Weber, NC; Kandler, J; Schlack, W; Grueber, Y; Frädorf, J; Preckel, B
Anesthesiology, 108(2): 199-207.
PDF (1035) | CrossRef
Role of Heat Shock Protein 90 and Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase during Early Anesthetic and Ischemic Preconditioning
Amour, J; Brzezinska, AK; Weihrauch, D; Billstrom, AR; Zielonka, J; Krolikowski, JG; Bienengraeber, MW; Warltier, DC; Pratt, PF; Kersten, JR
Anesthesiology, 110(2): 317-325.
PDF (1328) | CrossRef
Hyperglycemia Adversely Modulates Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase during Anesthetic Preconditioning through Tetrahydrobiopterin– and Heat Shock Protein 90–mediated Mechanisms
Amour, J; Brzezinska, AK; Jager, Z; Sullivan, C; Weihrauch, D; Du, J; Vladic, N; Shi, Y; Warltier, DC; Pratt, PF; Kersten, JR
Anesthesiology, 112(3): 576-585.
PDF (1023) | CrossRef
Response Surface Modeling of the Interaction between Propofol and Sevoflurane
Schumacher, PM; Dossche, J; Mortier, EP; Luginbuehl, M; Bouillon, TW; Struys, MM
Anesthesiology, 111(4): 790-804.
PDF (2382) | CrossRef
Back to Top | Article Outline

© 2007 American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc.

Publication of an advertisement in Anesthesiology Online does not constitute endorsement by the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc. or Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. of the product or service being advertised.

Article Tools