Determination of the EC50 Amnesic Concentration of Etomidate and Its Diffusion Profile in Brain Tissue: Implications for In Vitro Studies
Benkwitz, Claudia M.D.*; Liao, Mark B.S.†; Laster, Michael J. D.V.M.†; Sonner, James M. M.D.‡; Eger, Edmond I. II M.D.§; Pearce, Robert A. M.D., Ph.D.∥
Background: Etomidate is a widely used general anesthetic that has become a useful tool to investigate mechanisms of anesthetic action in vivo and in brain slices. However, the free aqueous concentration of etomidate that corresponds to amnesia in vivo and the diffusion profile of etomidate in brain slices are not known.
Methods: The authors assessed the effect of intraperitoneally injected etomidate on contextual fear conditioning in mice. Etomidate concentrations in brain tissue were obtained by high-performance liquid chromatography. Uptake studies in 400-μm-thick brain slices were used to calculate the diffusion and partition coefficients of etomidate. A diffusion model was used to calculate the expected concentration profile within a brain slice as a function of time and depth. The predicted rate of drug equilibration was compared with the onset of electrophysiologic effects on inhibitory circuit function in recordings from hippocampal brain slices.
Results: Etomidate impaired contextual fear conditioning with an ED50 dose of 11.0 ± 0.1 mg after intraperitoneal injection, which corresponded to an EC50 brain concentration of 208 ± 9 ng/g. The brain:artificial cerebrospinal fluid partition coefficient was 3.35, yielding an EC50,amnesia aqueous concentration of 0.25 μm. The diffusion coefficient was approximately 0.2 × 10−6 cm2/s. The development of etomidate action in hippocampal brain slices was compatible with the concentration profile predicted by this diffusion coefficient.
Conclusions: The free aqueous concentration of etomidate corresponding to amnesia, as defined by impaired contextual fear conditioning in mice, is 0.25 μm. Diffusion of etomidate into brain slices requires approximately an hour to reach 80% equilibration at a typical recording depth of 100 μm. This information will be useful in designing and interpreting in vitro studies using etomidate.
ETOMIDATE [R-1-ethyl-1-(a-methylbenzyl)-imidazole-5-carboxylate] is an ultrashort-acting nonbarbiturate intravenous anesthetic that is widely used as an induction agent for general anesthesia. The standard induction dose rapidly produces hypnosis and immobility,1
and lower doses provide sedation.2,3
The ultrashort action of etomidate results from redistribution from the brain to other tissues and its high clearance by ester hydrolysis in the liver and the plasma.4–6
A large body of evidence suggests that etomidate acts by enhancing the response of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) type A receptors (GABAA
Rs) to GABA, or by direct activation of these receptors.7–9
Rs are the major inhibitory neurotransmitter receptors in the brain and are considered to be prime anesthetic target sites.7–9
In recombinant GABAA
Rs, etomidate acts as a positive modulator at low concentrations (0.1–1 μm), directly activates receptors at intermediate concentrations (> 5–10 μm),10–13
and inhibits receptor function at yet higher concentrations (> 50 μm).10,14
Similar findings of potentiation at low concentrations and direct activation and block at higher concentrations of etomidate were recently published for native GABAA
Rs in the spinal cord.15,16
These effects, in conjunction with its parallel in vitro
and in vivo
enantioselectivity, and its reduced effects in gene-targeted mice carrying mutations that render some GABAA
Rs insensitive to etomidate, strongly implicate the GABAA
R as the molecular target responsible for its anesthetic actions.17,18
Modulation and direct activation of GABAA
Rs by etomidate depend on subunit composition. Etomidate displays functional selectivity and greater potency and efficacy for β2
subunits over β1
This characteristic separates etomidate from many other anesthetics, in particular volatile agents, which are far more promiscuous with respect to their molecular target sites. Despite this considerable body of knowledge, we have yet to determine how the molecular interactions of etomidate with β2
Rs alter cellular function and integrative properties of neural networks to cause sedation and amnesia, hypnosis (unconsciousness), and immobility.19
The hippocampal brain slice is commonly used to study anesthetic effects on integrative electrophysiologic function. Beyond its use as a model system, anesthetic modulation of hippocampal function may itself contribute to their ability to impair learning and memory.20–22
In addition to mechanical stability and intact circuitry, this preparation offers several other advantages over in vivo
electrophysiologic recordings. These include the ability to precisely control the ionic milieu and to deliver pharmacologic agents at known concentrations. For studies of anesthetic effects, drug concentrations at tissue sites of action would ideally be the same as those that produce behavioral effects in vivo
. To accomplish this, the drug should be applied at the appropriate free concentration and for a duration that assures equilibration of brain tissue with the superfusion medium. In contrast to other anesthetics,23,24
few studies have measured the free
etomidate concentrations that correspond to specific behavioral endpoints,25
and no studies have determined the free
concentrations that produce amnesia. In addition, the diffusion coefficient for etomidate within brain slice tissue, and thus the duration for which etomidate must be applied before steady state is achieved, remain unknown. We recently showed that concentration–time–depth profiles within brain slices can vary substantially for different types of anesthetics because of their distinct physicochemical properties and that these details must be considered when designing or interpreting in vitro
We therefore performed the current study to answer two questions: (1) What free aqueous concentration of etomidate in vitro corresponds to amnesia in vivo? (2) What is the rate of diffusion of etomidate within a brain slice? The amnesic properties of etomidate were assessed using contextual fear conditioning. Tissue uptake measurements, extraction, high-performance liquid chromatography, and computational modeling allowed us to determine the partition and diffusion coefficients of etomidate, and thus to determine the EC50,amnesia of etomidate and calculate the expected tissue concentration as a function of time and depth in a brain slice preparation during drug application. We compared these predictions with electrophysiologic measurements of the effect of etomidate on hippocampal inhibitory network properties in acute brain slice preparations.
Materials and Methods
All experiments were conducted according to the guidelines laid out in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals28
and were approved by the Committee on Animal Research of the University of California, San Francisco, California, and by the University of Wisconsin Animal Care and Use Committee, Madison, Wisconsin.
Animals used in the current study were all hybrid wild-type mice. For behavioral analyses, determination of brain etomidate concentrations, and brain slice uptake studies, 129/SvJ × C57BL/6J mice were obtained from Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). Electrophysiologic recordings were performed with mice that either had the same genetic background (129/SvJ × C57BL/6J), kindly provided by Gregg Homanics, Ph.D. (Associate Professor of Anesthesiology and Pharmacology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA), or were 129/SvJ × 129/Sv hybrid mice, kindly provided by Uwe Rudolph, Ph.D. (Assistant Professor of Molecular Neuropharmacology, University of Zurich Medical School, Zurich, Switzerland). In the latter case, the embryonic stem cell was a 129/SvJ × 129/Sv hybrid and crossed with 129/SvJ mice. The theoretical contribution of the 129SvJ substrain is therefore 87.5% and that of the 129/Sv substrain is 12.5% in the second generation. Breeding pairs resulting from two generations of homozygous breedings were transferred from Zurich to Madison. The first generation offspring of these pairs provided the subjects for the current studies. Analysis of electrophysiologic recordings did not reveal any differences between the two hybrid wild-type strains, and data were therefore pooled. Animals were housed in the animal care facility under 12-h cycles of light and dark and had continuous access to standard mouse chow and water.
Anesthetic Behavioral Analysis I: Determination of Drug Equilibrium after a Single Injection of Etomidate
A single injection of etomidate results in a rapid peak in brain concentration followed by a rapid redistribution to the other tissues and then a steady slow decline in plasma levels due to ester hydrolysis.6
During this slow decline, the brain and blood compartments are in quasi-equilibrium, so brain concentrations also change slowly during this time.5,29
We desired to test the amnesic potential of etomidate when brain concentrations were changing only slowly but were still sufficient to produce substantial neurologic impairment. To identify the appropriate time window, we tested the effect of etomidate administration on open field activity after an intraperitoneal injection. For these experiments, 3- to 4-month-old animals (male and female) were placed in an open plastic chamber and allowed to move freely. All experiments were performed between 08:00 and 14:00 h. After an initial observation period of 30 min, animals were injected either with a single dose of etomidate (10 mg/kg) or saline (sham-injected controls). Afterward, mice were returned to the same chamber and observed for 60 min after injection. For behavioral analysis, they were videotaped, and their behavior was scored either off-line or in parallel with the recording. An independent observer classified the behavior as “exploring” (locomotor activity), “immobile,” “grooming” (including face and paw washing), or “undefined” (none of the previous categories). Data analysis was performed with custom routines written in Matlab (The MathWorks Inc., Natick, MA).
Anesthetic Behavioral Analysis II: Contextual Fear Conditioning
Experiments were performed on 3- to 4-week-old animals (male and female) and conducted between 09:00 and 15:00 h. Using a pavlovian approach, we determined the dose of etomidate administered intraperitoneally required to reduce freezing to context by 50% as a measure for impaired learning and memory. Techniques applied for the determination of the effect of anesthetics on learning and memory have been described previously.30,31
Mice were injected only once with a single dose of etomidate ranging from 5 to 15 mg/kg. Control animals (n = 8) received injections of the vehicle used to deliver etomidate (35% propylene glycol in saline). Training for contextual fear conditioning took place 25–30 min after injection, which observations of open field activity had demonstrated to be during the middle of the slow recovery phase. Therefore, 25 min after injection of a single dose of etomidate, each animal was rapidly transferred to a training chamber and allowed to explore the chamber for 3 min before training began. Subsequently, animals received three 2-s electric foot shocks (11-Hz bipolar square waves) that were 90 s apart. Within 60 s after the last shock, animals were returned to their home cages. The shock currents were 1 mA at all etomidate doses. The next day, we assessed freezing to context. Each mouse was transferred to the identical chamber in which it was trained the previous day and was observed for 8 min. Shocks were not administered. Four animals were observed simultaneously, one in each of the four chambers via
a video camera. No personnel were in the context testing room during testing. To score freezing to context, an observation of one of the four animals was made every 2 s. Therefore, each animal was scored once every 8 s. Behavior was judged as freezing if there was no visible movement except for breathing.32
The percentage of time an animal froze during the 8-min observation period was calculated as the number of observations judged to be freezing divided by the total number of observations in 8 min, i.e.
, 60 observations.32
For each group score at a given etomidate dose, the mean and SEM were calculated. Nonlinear regression was performed to calculate a 50% effective dose (ED50
), the Hill coefficient (n), and the maximal value (A) of the dose–response curve for fear conditioning according to the equation
Goodness of fit was evaluated by using the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm, and Χ2 minimization in combination with the R2 value. Learning was defined as impaired if the group score differed from the corresponding unanesthetized (vehicle-injected) trained group.
Brain Slice Tissue Preparation
For electrophysiologic recordings, mice were decapitated under deep isoflurane and ketamine anesthesia, and the heads were immediately immersed in ice-cold (1°–2°C) dissection buffer consisting of 127 mm NaCl, 1.88 mm KCl, 1.21 mm KH2PO4, 26 mm NaHCO3, 1.44 mm MgSO4, 2.17 mm CaCl2, 2.5 mm ascorbic acid, 5 mm kynurenic acid, and 10 mm glucose saturated with 95%O2–5%CO2. With the brain immersed, a block of tissue containing both hippocampi was dissected out at an angle of approximately 15° off the frontal plane to allow for optimal visualization of the cortical laminae, and the tissue was fixed to a tray with cyanoacrylate glue. Transverse slices (400 μm) were cut with a vibrating microtome (Leica VT 1000S; Leica Microsystems Nussloch GmbH, Nussloch, Germany) and allowed to recover in dissection buffer at room temperature (22°–24°C) for at least 1 h. Subsequently, slices were held submerged for another hour at room temperature in carbogen-saturated artificial cerebrospinal fluid (ACSF) (pH 7.4, 290–300 mOsm), before transfer to the recording chamber. ACSF was identical to dissection buffer, except that ascorbic acid and kynurenic acid had been omitted.
Determination of Brain Etomidate Concentrations by Extraction and High-performance Liquid Chromatography
To determine the etomidate concentration present in the brain 30 min after injection (thus at the time during which mice were subjected to training to contextual fear conditioning), another set of animals was injected each with a single bolus of the same etomidate doses used for the behavioral analyses, and brain etomidate concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography.33
For these experiments, 30 min after injection, animals were decapitated, and the brains were quickly removed and weighed. Brain tissue was immediately homogenized in pentane (2 ml) after the addition of sodium fluoride (60 μl aqueous solution, 10 mg/ml). After separation of pentane, the extraction was repeated twice, each time with 2 ml pentane. Pooled pentane phase was evaporated under nitrogen. The residue was dissolved in 100 μl of the eluent, and 40 μl of the eluent was injected into the column (Agilent Zorbax Eclipse XDB-C18; 2.1 × 150 mm; 3.5 μm) of an Agilent 1100 Series LC system equipped with a quaternary pump and an ultraviolet detector (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, California). The detection wavelength was 242 nm. An isocratic mobile phase consisting of 25:25:50 (vol/vol) of acetonitrile:methanol:25 mm phosphate buffer (pH 8.1) was used at a flow rate of 0.25 ml/min. Standard curves were generated by spiking blank tissue samples with known amounts of etomidate and plotting the peak area against the concentration. We separately determined in spiked samples of brain that we had full recovery of etomidate, so it was not necessary to use an internal standard in quantifying etomidate concentrations. Data were analyzed using Microsoft Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, WA) and Origin 6.1 (MicroCal, Northampton, MA).
Etomidate Uptake Experiments
Isoflurane-anesthetized mice were decapitated and the brains rapidly removed and placed in iced ACSF. Slices were prepared with Tissue Slicer (Siskiyou, Inc., Grants Pass, OR). Single 400-μm-thick brain slices were placed in 200-ml flasks containing ACSF plus 0.8 mg/l (3.27 μm) etomidate that had been preequilibrated with carbogen gas. Flasks were placed in a covered container with a humidified carbogen atmosphere, and the assembly was gently agitated using a clinical rotator (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA) to ensure that the slices remained suspended in solution so that etomidate diffused into both tissue surfaces. Slices remained in solution 0.67–360 min. At a given test interval, a slice was removed from solution, blotted to remove excess ACSF, weighed, and transferred to a test tube for extraction and analysis as described above for whole brain.
Modeling Concentration–Time–Depth Profiles
The concentration–depth profile for diffusion into a brain slice was modeled using a one-dimensional diffusion equation.34
This model was chosen because of the geometry of the brain slices, which were approximately 10 × 10 × 0.4 mm thick. The model is given in dimensionless terms by the equation
D is the diffusivity, xo
is half of the slice thickness (200 μm), x is the depth within the slice, C is the concentration in the slice at time t, and Cf
is the equilibrium concentration in the slice.
Brain slices were prepared as described above and, after another hour of recovery in ACSF, were transferred to a recording chamber. Carbogen-saturated ACSF flowed through the recording chamber at a rate of 2.8 ml/min. Experiments were performed at room temperature (22°–24°C) on the stage of an upright microscope (BX50WI; Olympus, Melville, NY) equipped with a 10×, 0.25 NA Olympus objective. Pipettes were fabricated from borosilicate glass (1.7 mm OD, 1.1 mm ID; KG-33, Garner Glass, Claremont, CA) using a two-stage puller (Flaming-Brown model P-87; Sutter Instruments, Novato, CA). Pipette tips were fire polished and had open tip resistances of 2–4 MΩ when filled with ACSF. Bipolar stimulating electrodes were fabricated from tungsten (Microelectrodes Tungsten; World Precision Instruments, Sarasota, FL). The experimental setup for the “conditioned depression” paradigm was as follows: One pair of stimulating electrodes was placed in the alveus to activate recurrent (feedback) inhibition (conditioning pulse), whereas a second pair was placed in stratum radiatum to evoke population responses in CA1 pyramidal neurons by activating Schaffer collateral inputs. The recording electrode was placed in the CA1 layer. Conditioned responses were obtained at interstimulus intervals ranging from 5 to 1,000 ms, in the absence (control) and presence of etomidate (1 μm) and compared with the unconditioned response, which was the population spike evoked without previous alveus stimulus, or for some experiments the response at an interstimulus interval of 2,000 ms. Current pulses (0.1 ms duration) were delivered via constant current stimulus isolators (model A365D; World Precision Instruments) at a stimulus rate of 0.05 Hz and were adjusted throughout the course of the experiment such that alveus stimulation (200–800 μA) elicited supramaximal and stratum radiatum stimulation (60–250 μA) elicited half-maximal responses. All recordings were obtained in current clamp mode using an Axopatch 200B patch clamp amplifier (Axon Instruments, Union City, CA) and pClamp 8.0 software (Axon Instruments). Field potentials were amplified (×500), low-pass filtered at 5 kHz using internal amplifier circuitry, sampled at 10 kHz (Digidata 1200; Axon Instruments), and stored on the hard disk of a Pentium-based computer. For data analysis, ClampFit 8.0 (Axon Instruments), Origin 6.1, Microsoft Excel, Prism 4.0 (GraphPad, San Diego, CA), and custom written Matlab 6.5.1 routines were used.
Chemicals and Drugs
All chemicals were obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). Ultrapure water was purified with a Millipore Milli-Q® system (Billerica, MA) and used to prepare all solutions. Isoflurane was purchased from Abbott Laboratories (Abbott Park, IL), and ketamine HCl was from Lloyd Laboratories (Shenandoah, IA). Etomidate as a 0.2% (wt/vol) solution dissolved in propylene glycol (35% vol/vol) was obtained from Bedford Laboratories (Bedford, OH).
Results are reported as mean ± SD. Unpaired t tests were used to assess differences between etomidate- and sham-injected animals in open field activity experiments. One-way analysis of variance followed by Dunnett post hoc test or F test as appropriate was used to compare results from intraperitoneally injected versus control animals, with a level of P < 0.05 considered to be statistically significant.
Time Course of the Effect of Etomidate on Open Field Activity
Mice were allowed to move freely (open field activity) for 30 min before and for 60 min after intraperitoneal injection of etomidate (10 mg/kg) and were observed for “exploring,” “immobile,” “grooming,” or “undefined” behavior. “Exploring” and “immobile” comprised more than 90% of the total behavior, whereas “grooming” varied between 0 and 10% among animals. Because “exploring” and “immobile” showed an inverse relation and “undefined” behavior contributed less than 2% to the total behavior, only changes in “exploring” and “grooming” are shown (fig. 1
). Animals showed the highest level of exploration during the first 10 min after their transfer to the recording chamber, after which locomotor activity declined to a steady lower level (figs. 1A and B
). Injection of etomidate (10 mg/kg intraperitoneal) induced complete immobility within 3–5 min. Approximately 50–60 min after injection, levels of exploration had returned to approximately 50% (fig. 1A
) and as such were indistinguishable from baseline behavior in sham-injected animals. In the latter, injection of saline (sham injection) briefly increased locomotor activity for several minutes before exploratory behavior returned to a steady state level contributing to approximately 50% of total behavior (fig. 1B
). Although sham- and etomidate-injected animals did not differ in exploratory behavior during the 30-min preinjection period (70.0 ± 5.8% [n = 11] vs.
79.7 ± 4.5% [n = 10]; P
> 0.05, unpaired t
test), locomotor activity was significantly reduced in etomidate-injected versus
control animals 25–30 min after injection (58.0 ± 4.6% [n = 11] vs.
29.8 ± 3.1% [n = 10]; P
< 0.001, unpaired t
test) (fig. 1C
). Therefore, we chose the middle of this slow recovery phase, 25–30 min after injection (gray bar, fig. 1A
), as an appropriate time window for further experiments, because we expected brain concentrations to change only slowly during this time period.
Etomidate-induced Learning Impairment
We assessed the effect of a range of doses of etomidate on learning using contextual fear conditioning 25–30 min after injection (fig. 2
). In the absence of etomidate (vehicle-injected controls), training induced 92.4 ± 3.3% (n = 8) freezing to context. In comparison, untrained mice froze 11.7 ± 3.2% (n = 13) of the time during examination. Intraperitoneal injection of etomidate (5–15 mg/kg) resulted in a dose-dependent reduction of freezing to context, with an ED50
dose of 11 ± 0.1 mg (fig. 2A
). Etomidate doses higher than 12.5 mg/kg resulted in behavioral responses that were indistinguishable from untrained animals (P
> 0.05, one-way analysis of variance). High-performance liquid chromatography analysis of etomidate concentrations in the brain showed that this ED50
amnesic dose corresponded to an EC50
brain concentration of 208 ± 9 ng/g brain (fig. 2B
Determination of the EC50 Concentration of Etomidate for Amnesia
To establish the aqueous (free) concentration of etomidate corresponding to the brain concentration that impairs learning, we determined the partition coefficient by measuring the ratio of etomidate concentration in ACSF and in 400-μm-thick brain slices exposed to ACSF containing 0.8 mg/l (3.27 μm) etomidate in 35% propylene glycol for up to 360 min. Results from a total of 24 such measurements revealed that the concentration in the brain slice reached a plateau after 30–60 min of equilibration (fig. 3A
). In some samples, the concentration slowly declined after 60 min, perhaps because of a change in tissue characteristics (deterioration) during prolonged incubation. The final equilibrium concentration used to determine the partition coefficient was taken as the average concentration from 30 to 360 min. This yielded a value of 2,682 ± 155 ng/g brain (fig. 3A
). Taking into account the molecular weight of etomidate (244.3), the density of brain tissue (1.04),35
and the concentration of etomidate in ACSF (3.27 μm), this concentration corresponds to a brain:ACSF partition coefficient of 3.35. Therefore, the ACSF concentration that corresponds to a 50% reduction in freezing to context in vivo
, is 0.25 μm (fig. 2B
Determination of the Diffusion Coefficient of Etomidate and Its Concentration–Time–Depth Profile in Brain Slices
To determine the diffusion coefficient of etomidate in brain slices, we plotted the uptake data together with the expected average tissue concentrations corresponding to a variety of diffusion coefficients, which we calculated using a one-dimensional model of diffusion into both surfaces of a 400-μm-thick tissue slice (equation 1
). The rate of uptake corresponded to a diffusion coefficient of approximately 0.2 × 10−6
/s (fig. 3B
). To gauge the expected increase in concentration at different depths through a brain slice under typical recording conditions, we used this one-dimensional diffusion model34
and the estimated diffusion coefficient of D = 0.2 × 10−6
/s to calculate the concentration of etomidate as a function of time and depth for a 400-μm-thick brain slice with only the top surface perfused (fig. 4
). As expected, the concentration increased more rapidly near the surface than at deeper sites within the tissue. At a depth of approximately 100 μm, where electrophysiologic (extracellular) recordings are typically performed, approximately 80% of the final equilibrium concentration is reached only after 60 min of application.
Concentration Profile of Etomidate in a Brain Slice Preparation and Its Correlation with Electrophysiologic Data
To examine whether the concentration profile predicted by the diffusion model is compatible with physiologic data, we applied 1 μm etomidate to 400-μm-thick brain slices for up to 105 min and measured the effect of etomidate on neuronal function using the conditioned depression paradigm (fig. 5A
Etomidate (1 μm) did not alter the unconditioned response (fig. 5B
, single response) because the maxima of the population spike amplitudes as assessed by input/output curves in the presence of the anesthetic were not significantly different compared with those ones obtained under control or wash conditions ([etomidate/(control + wash)/2] = 1.05 ± 0.15; P
= 0.46, n = 9). In contrast, etomidate prolonged the duration of depression of the conditioned response (fig. 5B
, interstimulus interval 10/100/500). This effect was more pronounced the longer the slice was exposed to etomidate (fig. 5C
). To compare the onset rate of this physiologic effect with the onset predicted by our diffusion model (fig. 4
), we superimposed the normalized effects of etomidate at an interstimulus interval of 100 ms with the expected tissue concentrations (fig. 5D
). Solid lines show calculated concentrations at different depths based on the estimated diffusion coefficient for etomidate of 0.2 × 10−6
/s. The onset of physiologic responses corresponded most closely to a recording depth 100 μm below the surface of the slice. Because it is likely that the electrophysiologic signals we recorded were generated not at a single point source at this depth but rather came from tissue sites above and below this location, we also compared this value with the increase in average tissue concentration (integral) in the top half of a 400-μm-thick slice (dashed line). This again revealed a good correspondence between the observed onset rate for etomidate actions and the predicted drug concentration profile.
An important consideration in relating results from in vitro experiments to behavioral or physiologic consequences in vivo is assuring that equivalent drug concentrations are achieved. This requires that the free aqueous concentration present during general anesthesia be determined, commonly by measuring the serum concentration and the extent of plasma protein binding. We took a different approach and measured brain concentration and the brain:ACSF partition coefficient. In principle, under steady state conditions in vivo, these two approaches should yield the same values for the free drug concentration. However, under non–steady state conditions, such as following bolus injection of a drug, direct measurements of brain concentrations should more accurately reflect the concentration at the site of action. The aqueous concentration that yields this tissue concentration may be calculated using the partition coefficient. Applying this concentration in aqueous solution should then produce the same tissue concentration in vitro as in vivo.
In Vitro Anesthetic Concentrations That Correspond to in Vivo Responses
Because different anesthetic endpoints, such as hypnosis, amnesia, and immobility, are achieved at different anesthetic concentrations, assessing drug effects on putative anesthetic targets requires the use of concentrations corresponding to the endpoint of interest. The concentration of etomidate that corresponds to the minimal amnesic dose—whether plasma or free
aqueous—has not been measured previously. Plasma concentrations have been determined after induction (12–24 μm),29
and during continuous infusion for maintenance of anesthesia in the clinical setting (5–8 μm).1,36,37
Also, minimal hypnotic concentrations in humans (1.2 μm)38
and the concentration that produces loss of righting reflex in rodents (1.6 μm)39
have been reported. Taking into account 78% plasma protein binding,1
these plasma concentrations correspond to free
aqueous concentrations of 2.5–5.0 μm at induction, 1–2 μm for maintenance of “anesthesia,” and 0.25–0.35 μm for awakening or recovery of righting reflex. The latter concentration is similar to that which we determined impairs fear conditioning to context. Taking into account the brain:ACSF partition coefficient of 3.35 that we measured, this concentration is also similar to the concentration that impairs water maze learning in mice (0.74 μm in brain tissue/3.35 = 0.22 μm).40
Based on the observation that the concentration of anesthetics required to suppress learning depends on the specific learning task used, and in general hippocampus-dependent learning is the most susceptible to disruption by drugs,30
a higher free concentration of etomidate could be required to impair other types of memory. Our measurements of locomotor activity (fig. 1
) suggest that recovery of righting reflex may actually occur at a higher concentration than the estimate derived from plasma concentration and protein binding,1,39
because not only was the righting reflex intact at a drug level that impaired conditioning to context by 50%, but at the same time the mice were spontaneously exploring their environment (albeit at a reduced level).
Etomidate Diffusion into Brain Slices
In addition to applying the appropriate equilibrium drug concentration, a second consideration when performing brain slice experiments is knowing that the concentration at tissue sites of action is near equilibrium. Like many other anesthetics, etomidate is more soluble in lipid than in aqueous environments, and for drugs such as propofol and diazepam, the slowness of diffusion mandates several hours to reach equilibrium.27
The diffusion coefficient that we measured for etomidate (D = 0.2 × 10−6
/s) is 10 times that of propofol (D = 0.02 × 10−6
but not as great as that of halothane (D = 0.8 × 10−6
Therefore, using a one-dimensional diffusion model, we calculated that when etomidate is applied to only the top surface of a 400-μm-thick brain slice, approximately 60 min is required before the average concentration in the top half has reached 80% of the final equilibrium value, and concentrations increase even more slowly at greater depths (fig. 4
). Our physiologic measurements of the rate of onset of drug action were consistent with these estimates (fig. 5
). The implication of this finding is that the low rate of etomidate diffusion should be taken into account when designing and interpreting experiments with brain slices, either by providing a sufficient duration for equilibration or by using thinner preparations, such as organotypic slice cultures, to assure more rapid equilibration.41
Alternatively, delivery of the drug to both surfaces of a slice instead of single-sided perfusion can have a large impact on drug delivery, because equilibration time is inversely related to the square of the tissue thickness (equation 4
). A further implication is that in previous experiments in which etomidate was applied to brain slices for only a brief time, equilibrium levels were unlikely to have been achieved except near the surface of the slice, and drug effects may have been observed at significantly lower concentrations had longer durations of drug application been tested.25,42–47
Although its slow diffusion through brain tissue substantially influences the rate of drug equilibration in brain slice experiments, in clinical use, etomidate results in a rapid (30–60 s) onset of hypnosis after a standard induction dose of 0.15–0.3 mg/kg administered intravenously. This is due at least in part to the short distance between the site of delivery via the microvasculature and tissue sites of action. In addition, induction doses produce blood levels higher than the EC50 equilibrium concentrations, and this also contributes to the rapid onset of clinical effects.
Mechanisms of General Anesthesia
The mechanism by which etomidate produces general anesthesia is thought to be primarily via
enhancement of the activity of β2
- and/or β3
The results of recent experiments with genetically modified mice carrying mutations in the β2
subunits provide strong support for this hypothesis, at least with regard to immobility and sedation/hypnosis.48–50
However, additional presynaptic and postsynaptic actions of etomidate have been described, such as block of different classes of calcium51
and sodium channels,52,53
block of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors,54–56
agonistic effects on α2
inhibition of brain nitric oxide synthase activity,58
and inhibition of glutamate release during ischemia.59
Our current results demonstrating that amnesia is produced at concentrations of approximately 0.25 μm suggest that these other actions are unlikely to play major roles in etomidate-induced amnesia, because they occur only at much higher concentrations (> 10 μm). In addition, our finding that GABAA
R-mediated feedback inhibition in the hippocampus is strongly enhanced by 1 μm etomidate (fig. 5
) further supports a role for β2
- and/or β3
-containing synaptic receptors in producing behavioral effects.
Population responses are produced by the synchronous firing of many pyramidal cells, reflecting the integration of several different influences. Our finding that 1 μm etomidate did not alter the unconditioned response to Schaffer collateral stimulation (single response, fig. 5B
) indicates that under the conditions of our experiments etomidate did not enhance tonic inhibition enough to suppress action potential generation after excitatory synaptic stimulation, although it did substantially enhance phasic (feedback) inhibition. Also, these results provide additional evidence against sodium channels as significant targets at this concentration of etomidate. By contrast, the etomidate concentration that corresponds to the EC50
for amnesia (0.25 μm) does fall within the concentration range at which effects of etomidate were reported for expressed GABAA
and for other integrative responses that are known to depend on GABAA
Rs, including spontaneous action potential firing49
in cortical slice cultures.
In conclusion, the free aqueous EC50 concentration of etomidate that corresponds to amnesia produced by intraperitoneal administration in vivo is 0.25 μm. Diffusion of etomidate through brain tissue is slow enough that after 1 h, the concentration has reached only 80% of the final equilibrium concentration at a typical brain slice recording depth of 100 μm. These factors should be considered when interpreting existing studies and when designing in vitro experiments.
The authors thank Harald Hentschke, Ph.D. (Assistant Scientist, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin), for providing custom-written routines for analysis of electrophysiologic data. They also thank Matthew Banks, Ph.D. (Assistant Professor, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Wisconsin), for critical reading of the manuscript and helpful discussions, and Mark Perkins, B.S. (Research Specialist, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Wisconsin), for excellent technical assistance.
1. Giese JL, Stanley TH: Etomidate: A new intravenous anesthetic induction agent. Pharmacotherapy 1983; 3:251–8
2. Falk J, Zed PJ: Etomidate for procedural sedation in the emergency department. Ann Pharmacother 2004; 38:1272–7
3. Angelini G, Ketzler JT, Coursin DB: Use of propofol and other nonbenzodiazepine sedatives in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Clin 2001; 17:863–80
4. Gooding JM, Corssen G: Etomidate: An ultrashort-acting nonbarbiturate agent for anesthesia induction. Anesth Analg 1976; 55:286–9
5. Ghoneim MM, Korttila K: Pharmacokinetics of intravenous anaesthetics: Implications for clinical use. Clin Pharmacokinet 1977; 2:344–72
6. Lewi PJ, Heykants JJ, Janssen PA: Intravenous pharmacokinetic profile in rats of etomidate, a short-acting hypnotic drug. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther 1976; 220:72–85
7. GABA in the Nervous System: The View at Fifty Years, 1st edition. Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2000, pp 1–484
8. Pearce RA: General anesthetic effects on GABAA receptors, Neural Mechanisms of Anesthesia. Edited by Antognini JF, Carstens EE, Raines DE. Totowa, New Jersey, Humana Press, 2003, pp 265–82
9. Tanelian DL, Kosek P, Mody I, MacIver MB: The role of the GABAA receptor/chloride channel complex in anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1993; 78:757–76
10. Belelli D, Lambert JJ, Peters JA, Wafford K, Whiting PJ: The interaction of the general anesthetic etomidate with the γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptor is influenced by a single amino acid. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1997; 94:11031–6
11. Siegwart R, Jurd R, Rudolph U: Molecular determinants for the action of general anesthetics at recombinant alpha(2)beta(3)gamma(2) gamma-aminobutyric acid(A) receptors. J Neurochem 2002; 80:140–8
12. Sanna E, Murgia A, Casula A, Biggio G: Differential subunit dependence of the actions of the general anesthetics alphaxalone and etomidate at gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptors expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes. Mol Pharmacol 1997; 51:484–90
13. Smith AJ, Oxley B, Malpas S, Pillai GV, Simpson PB: Compounds exhibiting selective efficacy for different beta subunits of human recombinant gamma-aminobutyric acid A receptors. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2004; 311:601–9
14. Hill-Venning C, Belelli D, Peters JA, Lambert JJ: Subunit-dependent interaction of the general anaesthetic etomidate with the GABAA receptor. Br J Pharmacol 1997; 120:749–56
15. Hong Z, Wang DS: Potentiation, activation and blockade of GABAA receptors by etomidate in the rat sacral dorsal commissural neurons. Neuroscience 2005; 132:1045–53
16. Robertson B: Actions of anaesthetics and avermectin on GABAA chloride channels in mammalian dorsal root ganglion neurones. Br J Pharmacol 1989; 98:167–76
17. Belelli D, Muntoni AL, Merrywest SD, Gentet LJ, Casula A, Callachan H, Madau P, Gemmell DK, Hamilton NM, Lambert JJ, Sillar KT, Peters JA: The in vitro and in vivo enantioselectivity of etomidate implicates the GABAA receptor in general anaesthesia. Neuropharmacology 2003; 45:57–71
18. Tomlin SL, Jenkins A, Lieb WR, Franks NP: Stereoselective effects of etomidate optical isomers on gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptors and animals. Anesthesiology 1998; 88:708–17
19. Urban BW: Current assessment of targets and theories of anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2002; 89:167–83
20. MacIver MB: The hippocampus, Neural Mechanisms of Anesthesia, 1st edition. Edited by Antognini JF, Carstens EE, Raines DE. Totowa, New Jersey, Humana Press, 2003, pp 149–68
21. Pearce RA: Volatile anesthetic enhancement of paired-pulse depression investigated in the rat hippocampus in vitro. J Physiol 1996; 492:823–40
22. Faulkner HJ, Traub RD, Whittington MA: Disruption of synchronous gamma oscillations in the rat hippocampal slice: A common mechanism of anaesthetic drug action. Br J Pharmacol 1998; 125:483–92
23. Franks NP, Lieb WR: Molecular and cellular mechanisms of general anaesthesia. Nature 1994; 367:607–14
24. Eger EI2, Fisher DM, Dilger JP, Sonner JM, Evers AR, Franks NP, Harris RA, Kendig JJ, Lieb WR, Yamakura T: Relevant concentrations of inhaled anesthetics for in vitro studies of anesthetic mechanisms. Anesthesiology 2001; 94:915–21
25. Dickinson R, Awaiz S, Whittington MA, Lieb WR, Franks NP: The effects of general anaesthetics on carbachol-evoked gamma oscillations in the rat hippocampus in vitro. Neuropharmacology 2003; 44:864–72
26. Chesney MA, Perouansky M, Pearce RA: Differential uptake of volatile agents into brain tissue in vitro: Measurement and application of a diffusion model to determine concentration profiles in brain slices. Anesthesiology 2003; 99:122–30
27. Gredell JA, Turnquist PA, MacIver MB, Pearce RA: Determination of diffusion and partition coefficients of propofol in rat brain tissue: implications for studies of drug action in vitro. Br J Anaesth 2004; 93:810–7
28. Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources, Commission on Life Sciences, National Research Council: Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, Washington, DC, National Academy Press, 1996.
29. Heykants JJ, Meuldermans WE, Michiels LJ, Lewi PJ, Janssen PA: Distribution, metabolism and excretion of etomidate, a short-acting hypnotic drug, in the rat: Comparative study of (R)-(+)-(-)-etomidate. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther 1975; 216:113–29
30. Dutton RC, Maurer AJ, Sonner JM, Fanselow MS, Laster MJ, Eger EI II: The concentration of isoflurane required to suppress learning depends on the type of learning. Anesthesiology 2001; 94:514–9
31. Liao M, Sonner JM, Jurd R, Rudolph U, Borghese CM, Harris RA, Laster MJ, Eger EI. Beta3-containing gamma-aminobutyric acidA receptors are not major targets for the amnesic and immobilizing actions of isoflurane. Anesth Analg 2005; 101:412–8
32. Fanselow MS: Conditioned and unconditional components of post-shock freezing. Pavlov J Biol Sci 1980; 15:177–82
33. McIntosh MP, Rajewski RA: A simple and efficient high-performance liquid chromatographic assay for etomidate in plasma. J Pharm Biomed Anal 2001; 24:689–94
34. Bennett CO, Myers JE: Momentum, Heat, and Mass Transfer, 3rd edition. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1982
35. Weaver BM, Staddon GE, Mapleson WW: Tissue/blood and tissue/water partition coefficients for propofol in sheep. Br J Anaesth 2001; 86:693–703
36. Cold GE, Eskesen V, Eriksen H, Blatt LB: Changes in CMRO2, EEG and concentration of etomidate in serum and brain tissue during craniotomy with continuous etomidate supplemented with N2O and fentanyl. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1986; 30:159–163
37. De Wildt DJ, Hillen FC, Rauws AG, Sangster B: Etomidate-anaesthesia, with and without fentanyl, compared with urethane-anaesthesia in the rat. Br J Pharmacol 1983; 79:461–9
38. Schuttler J, Wilms M, Lauven PM, Stoeckel H, Koenig A: Pharmacokinetics of etomidate in man [author's transl]. Anaesthesist 1980; 29:658–61
39. De Paepe P, Belpaire FM, Van Hoey G, Boon PA, Buylaert WA: Influence of hypovolemia on the pharmacokinetics and the electroencephalographic effect of etomidate in the rat. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1999; 290:1048–53
40. Cheng VY, Martin LJ, Elliott EM, Kim JH, Mount HT, Taverna FA, Roder JC, MacDonald JF, Bhambri A, Collinson N, Wafford KA, Orser BA: Alpha5GABAA receptors mediate the amnestic but not sedative-hypnotic effects of the general anesthetic etomidate. J Neurosci 2006; 26:3713–20
41. Drexler B, Roether CL, Jurd R, Rudolph U, Antkowiak B: Opposing actions of etomidate on cortical theta oscillations are mediated by different γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptor subtypes. Anesthesiology 2005; 102:346–52
42. Proctor WR, Mynlieff M, Dunwiddie TV: Facilitatory action of etomidate and pentobarbital on recurrent inhibition in rat hippocampal pyramidal neurons. J Neurosci 1986; 6:3161–8
43. Pawelzik H, Hughes DI, Thomson AM: Modulation of inhibitory autapses and synapses on rat CA1 interneurones by GABA(A) receptor ligands. J Physiol 2003; 546:701–16
44. Dunwiddie TV, Worth TS, Olsen RW: Facilitation of recurrent inhibition in rat hippocampus by barbiturate and related nonbarbiturate depressant drugs. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1986; 238:564–75
45. Ashton D, Wauquier A: Modulation of a GABA-ergic inhibitory circuit in the in vitro hippocampus by etomidate isomers. Anesth Analg 1985; 64:975–80
46. Zhan RZ, Qi S, Wu C, Fujihara H, Taga K, Shimoji K: Intravenous anesthetics differentially reduce neurotransmission damage caused by oxygen-glucose deprivation in rat hippocampal slices in correlation with N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor inhibition. Crit Care Med 2001; 29:808–13
47. Joksovic PM, Brimelow BC, Murbartian J, Perez-Reyes E, Todorovic SM: Contrasting anesthetic sensitivities of T-type Ca2+ channels of reticular thalamic neurons and recombinant Ca(v)3.3 channels. Br J Pharmacol 2005; 144:59–70
48. Reynolds DS, Rosahl TW, Cirone J, O'Meara GF, Haythornthwaite A, Newman RJ, Myers J, Sur C, Howell O, Rutter AR, Atack J, Macaulay AJ, Hadingham KL, Hutson PH, Belelli D, Lambert JJ, Dawson GR, McKernan R, Whiting PJ, Wafford KA: Sedation and anesthesia mediated by distinct GABA(A) receptor isoforms. J Neurosci 2003; 23:8608–17
49. Jurd R, Arras M, Lambert S, Drexler B, Siegwart R, Crestani F, Zaugg M, Vogt KE, Ledermann B, Antkowiak B, Rudolph U: General anesthetic actions in vivo strongly attenuated by a point mutation in the GABA(A) receptor beta3 subunit. FASEB J 2003; 17:250–2
50. Zeller A, Arras M, Lazaris A, Jurd R, Rudolph U: Distinct molecular targets for the central respiratory and cardiac actions of the general anesthetics etomidate and propofol. FASEB J 2005; 19:1677–9
51. Takahashi H, Terrar DA: Effects of etomidate on whole-cell and single L-type calcium channel currents in guineapig isolated ventricular myocytes. Br J Anaesth 1994; 73:812–9
52. Frenkel C, Weckbecker K, Wartenberg HC, Duch DS, Urban BW: Blocking effects of the anaesthetic etomidate on human brain sodium channels. Neurosci Lett 1998; 249:131–4
53. Lingamaneni R, Hemmings HC Jr: Differential interaction of anaesthetics and antiepileptic drugs with neuronal Na+ channels, Ca2+ channels, and GABA(A) receptors. Br J Anaesth 2003; 90:199–211
54. Charlesworth P, Richards CD: Anaesthetic modulation of nicotinic ion channel kinetics in bovine chromaffin cells. Br J Pharmacol 1995; 114:909–17
55. Wachtel RE, Wegrzynowicz ES: Kinetics of nicotinic acetylcholine ion channels in the presence of intravenous anaesthetics and induction agents. Br J Pharmacol 1992; 106:623–7
56. Flood P, Krasowski MD: Intravenous anesthetics differentially modulate ligand-gated ion channels. Anesthesiology 2000; 92:1418–25
57. Paris A, Philipp M, Tonner PH, Steinfath M, Lohse M, Scholz J, Hein L: Activation of alpha 2B-adrenoceptors mediates the cardiovascular effects of etomidate. Anesthesiology 2003; 99:889–95
58. Galley HF, Webster NR: Brain nitric oxide synthase activity is decreased by intravenous anesthetics. Anesth Analg 1996; 83:591–4
59. Patel PM, Goskowicz RL, Drummond JC, Cole DJ: Etomidate reduces ischemia-induced glutamate release in the hippocampus in rats subjected to incomplete forebrain ischemia. Anesth Analg 1995; 80:933–9
This article has been cited 12 time(s).
Anesthesia and AnalgesiaIncreases in spinal cerebrospinal fluid potassium concentration do not increase isoflurane minimum alveolar concentration in ratsAnesthesia and Analgesia
NeuropharmacologyDistinct actions of etomidate and propofol at beta 3-containing gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptorsNeuropharmacology
Journal of NeurophysiologyGABA(A) Receptor alpha 5 Subunits Contribute to GABA(A,slow) Synaptic Inhibition in Mouse HippocampusJournal of Neurophysiology
Journal of Physiology-LondonGABA(A) and glycine receptor-mediated transmission in rat lamina II neurones: relevance to the analgesic actions of neuroactive steroidsJournal of Physiology-London
Journal of NeurophysiologyAltered GABA(A,slow) Inhibition and Network Oscillations in Mice Lacking the GABA(A) Receptor beta(3) SubunitJournal of Neurophysiology
Pharmacology & TherapeuticsNeurosteroid modulation of synaptic and extrasynaptic GABA(A) receptorsPharmacology & Therapeutics
Brain ResearchVarying magnitude of GABAergic recurrent inhibition enhancement by different sedative/anesthetic agents in dorsal and ventral hippocampusBrain Research
Anesthesia and AnalgesiaModeling the Gabaergic Action of Etomidate on the Thalamocortical SystemAnesthesia and Analgesia
Neuroscience LettersSevoflurane-induced loss of consciousness is paralleled by a prominent modification of neural activity during cortical down-statesNeuroscience Letters
European Journal of PharmacologyEnhancing the function of alpha5-subunit-containing GABA(A) receptors promotes action potential firing of neocortical neurons during up-statesEuropean Journal of Pharmacology
Brain ResearchInvestigation into the effect of the general anaesthetic etomidate on local neuronal synchrony in the mouse neocortical sliceBrain Research
© 2007 American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc.
Publication of an advertisement in Anesthesiology Online does not constitute endorsement by the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc. or Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. of the product or service being advertised.