Skip Navigation LinksHome > July 2005 - Volume 103 - Issue 1 > Sex- and Age-related Differences in Morphine Requirements fo...
Anesthesiology:
Pain and Regional Anesthesia

Sex- and Age-related Differences in Morphine Requirements for Postoperative Pain Relief

Aubrun, Frédéric M.D.*; Salvi, Nadège M.D.†; Coriat, Pierre M.D.‡; Riou, Bruno M.D., Ph.D.§

Free Access
Article Outline
Collapse Box

Author Information

Collapse Box

Abstract

Background: Sex-related differences in the perception of pain and susceptibility to opioids remain a matter of debate. Intravenous morphine titration used to obtain pain relief in the immediate postoperative period is a unique clinical model for assessing the effect of sex on reported pain. Because of the wide variation in dose requirements for pain management, the authors conducted a prospective study in a large population and also assessed the effect of aging.
Methods: Intravenous morphine titration was administered as a bolus of 2 (body weight ≪ 60 kg) or 3 mg (body weight > 60 kg) during the immediate postoperative period. The interval between each bolus was 5 min. The visual analog pain scale (VAS) threshold required to administer morphine was 30, and pain relief was defined as a VAS score of 30 or less. Data are expressed as mean ± SD.
Results: Data from 4,317 patients were analyzed; 54% of the patients were male, and 46% were female. The mean morphine dose required to obtain pain relief was 11.9 ± 6.8 mg or 0.173 ± 0.103 mg/kg. Women had a higher initial VAS score (74 ± 19 vs. 71 ± 19; P < 0.001) and required a greater dose of morphine (0.183 ± 0.111 vs. 0.165 ± 0.095 mg/kg; P < 0.001). In contrast, no significant difference was noted in elderly (aged > 75 yr) patients (0.163 ± 0.083 vs. 0.157 ± 0.085 mg/kg).
Conclusion: Women experienced more severe postoperative pain and required a greater dose (+11%) of morphine than men in the immediate postoperative period. This sex-related difference disappeared in elderly patients.
SEX-RELATED differences in the perception of pain and susceptibility to opioids remain a matter of debate. Experimental studies show that there are sex-related differences in opioid analgesia,1 but there are discrepancies between animal and human studies.2 An outstanding feature of the clinical use of opioids is the extraordinary variation in dose requirements for pain management.3–6 Therefore, we believed that only a study conducted in a large population could precisely answer the question of sex-related differences and that the responses would be clinically relevant despite individual variation. Any physiologic or pharmacologic sex-related difference may be markedly modulated by aging because gonadal hormonal secretions are deeply modified by the menopause in women and to a lesser degree by the andropause in men. However, no previous study has assessed the effect of aging on the sex-related differences on pain perception or the response to analgesic drugs.
The immediate postoperative period provides an interesting clinical model, mainly because the procedure of intravenous morphine titration enables precise control of doses of morphine to treat pain reported by the patient over a short period of time. Therefore, we decided to compare pain scores and postoperative morphine consumption in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) between men and women. We tested the following hypotheses: (1) There are significant differences in postoperative pain perception and morphine consumption between men and women, and (2) these differences are modulated by aging.
Back to Top | Article Outline

Materials and Methods

This study was approved by our hospital ethical committee (Comité Consultatif de Protection des Personnes se Prêtant à la Recherche Biomédicale Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France). Because data were recorded without any intervention and according to a protocol already used routinely our PACU,7,8 authorization was given to waive written informed consent. However, complete information on the postoperative management of pain, including intravenous morphine titration and pain assessment, was provided during the preoperative visit with the anesthesiologist. Some patients have been included in previous studies on morphine titration.7–9
Back to Top | Article Outline
Intravenous Morphine Titration
All nurses in the PACU had been trained to assess pain using unidimensional scales and to perform morphine titration. They used the visual analog pain scale (VAS; 0–100, handheld slide rule type)10 and a special form for data collection. When patients had difficulties in manipulating the VAS, nurses were allowed to use a numerical rating scale (from 0 to 100)11 because these two methods are equivalent.12
A strict protocol has been implemented in the PACU after a preliminary study determined the optimal regimen of morphine titration.8 This protocol defined the dose of intravenous boluses of morphine, the interval between boluses, the absence of limitation on the total dose, the VAS threshold required to administer morphine, and the criteria to stop titration. After arrival of patients in the PACU, they were questioned, after tracheal extubation and the return of full consciousness, about the presence of pain (at least every 15 min before the onset of morphine titration) and asked to rate pain intensity on a scale (VAS). When the VAS score was greater than 30, intravenous morphine was titrated every 5 min by 3-mg increments (2 mg in patients weighing ≪ 60 kg), and pain was assessed every 5 min until pain relief, defined as a VAS score of 30 or less. When the patient was asleep, no attempt was made at arousal. In this situation, the patient was considered as having adequate pain relief and was assigned a score of 0. When pain was too severe to obtain a VAS (patient refusal), it was assigned a score of 100. Clinical monitoring included respiratory rate measurements, oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry, sedation according to the Ramsay score,13 arterial blood pressure, and heart rate. Morphine titration was stopped if the patient had a respiratory rate lower than 12 breaths/min or an oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry lower than 95% or experienced a serious adverse event related to morphine administration (allergy with cutaneous rash and/or hypotension, vomiting, severe pruritus). In case of severe ventilatory depression (respiratory rate < 10 breaths/min), naloxone (intravenous bolus of 0.04 mg) was administered until the respiratory rate was greater than 12 breaths/min. As previously reported,9 a severe postoperative pain was defined as an initial VAS score of 70 or greater.
In the current study, nurses could not be blinded to the patient’s sex; thus, a possible bias could have occurred. Therefore, the data sheets of the first 1,050 patients were retrospectively assessed for potential protocol deviation, as previously reported.8 Moreover, we also looked for opioid dose administered during surgery in the last patients.
Back to Top | Article Outline
Patients
During the data collection period, consecutive patients who fulfilled the following criteria were included: (1) VAS score greater than 30 and (2) understanding of the unidimensional methods. Patients with minor pain (defined as a VAS score ≪ 30), with delirium or dementia, or who were non–French-speaking were not included in the study. Criteria for exclusion were interruption of morphine titration because of the occurrence of severe morphine-related adverse effects. Sedation was not considered a severe morphine adverse effect, as previously reported.7,8 Patients who received other analgesics (or regional anesthesia) as a rescue procedure because of lack of pain relief with morphine were also excluded. This decision was taken by the anesthesiologist, usually in patients requiring more than 10 boluses of morphine.
Morphine requirement (expressed as milligram per kilogram body weight) was the amount of morphine needed to obtain pain relief (VAS score ≪ 30) during intravenous morphine titration.
Back to Top | Article Outline
Statistical Analysis
Data are expressed as mean ± SD or median and 95% confidence interval. The Student t test was used to compare two means, the Mann–Whitney U test was used to compare two medians, and the Fisher exact method was used to compare two proportions.
The database was prospectively recorded for several research purposes.7–9 The decision to analyze sex differences was taken very early, but the decision to analyze the data base for sex differences was delayed until a large number of patients (> 4,000) had been included. Patients were divided into two groups according to their sex. The between group difference in morphine requirement and its 95% confidence interval were calculated. The following subgroup analyses were specified a priori: (1) exclusion of patients undergoing surgery related to their sex (i.e., hysterectomy, prostatectomy, breast surgery, genital surgery); (2) elderly (aged ≫ 75 yr) and nonelderly patients, who were separated into two groups (18–49 yr and 50–74 yr); and (3) according to the nature of the surgery, including groups in which at least 120 patients have been included.
All comparisons were two tailed, and a P value of less than 0.05 was required to rule out the null hypothesis. Statistical analysis was performed using a computer and NCSS 2001 software (Statistical Solutions Ltd., Cork, Ireland).
Back to Top | Article Outline

Results

Among 4,525 patients who fulfilled the criteria for inclusion, important data were lacking in 53 patients, and morphine titration was interrupted because of severe morphine adverse effects in 110 patients (2.4%) or administration of a rescue analgesic in 45 patients (1.0%). Therefore, data from 4,317 patients were analyzed in the study. The mean age was 50 ± 18 yr, the mean weight was 70 ± 14 kg, 2,334 patients (54%) were male, and 1,983 patients (46%) were female. They were admitted in the PACU after orthopedic surgery in 3,149 patients (73%), urologic surgery in 595 patients (14%), abdominal or gynecologic surgery in 266 patients (6%), vascular surgery in 121 patients (3%), and thoracic or cervicomaxillofacial surgery in 159 patients (4%). Locoregional anesthesia was performed in 267 patients (6%), and general anesthesia was performed in 4,050 patients (94%). In patients undergoing general anesthesia, 4,001 (99%) received sufentanil, 37 (0.9%) received remifentanil, and 12 (0.3%) received alfentanil.
The mean value of the initial VAS score was 72 ± 19 (median, 70). The mean morphine dose required to obtain pain relief was 11.9 ± 6.8 mg or 0.173 ± 0.103 mg/kg (median, 0.150 mg/kg). Pain relief was obtained after a median of 4 boluses, with extremes ranging from 1 to 20 boluses.
Table 1
Table 1
Image Tools
Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Image Tools
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Image Tools
Table 2
Table 2
Image Tools
Table 1 summarizes the differences between men and women. Women had a higher initial VAS and required a greater dose of morphine (difference, 0.019 mg/kg [95% confidence interval, 0.013–0.025], +11%). The evolution of VAS and the proportion of patients experiencing pain relief during morphine titration are shown in figure 1. The subgroup analysis is shown in figure 2. The significant difference between men and women was still observed after patients who received sex-related surgery were excluded. The difference was noted in most of the surgical procedures analyzed. In contrast, no significant difference was noted in elderly patients (fig. 2). Table 2 shows that age modified morphine consumption in women but not in men (table 2).
We performed a quality control in the first 1,050 patients. Deviation of the protocol of intravenous morphine titration occurred in 38 patients, but no significant difference was observed between men and women (3.6 vs. 3.6%). The dose of sufentanil used in the preoperative period was collected in the last patients (n = 1,409). Women required a greater dose of sufentanil than men (0.698 ± 0.376 vs. 0.646 ± 0.412 μg/kg; difference, 0.052 μg/kg [95% confidence interval, 0.012–0.092], +8%).
Back to Top | Article Outline

Discussion

In the current study, we observed that women had significantly higher VAS scores and required more morphine during intravenous titration in the postoperative period than men. The magnitude of the difference in morphine requirements was estimated to be around 11%. This difference was not observed in elderly patients (aged ≫ 75 yr).
The VAS is the most commonly used tool to assess pain in the perioperative period and to measure outcome in clinical research.14 The VAS is sensitive to pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic procedures that alter the experience of pain and correlates well with pain verbal rating scales.15 In our study, we used the morphine dose required to obtain pain relief as an estimate of pain intensity. This measurement is not completely independent from the VAS measurement because the VAS is used to define pain relief. We have previously proposed two ways in defining the severity of pain: The first is mainly related to the patient’s perception of pain, whereas the other depends largely on the amount of analgesics required to obtain pain relief.9 This last definition may be useful in clinical practice because it is related to the pharmacologic effort subsequently developed to obtain pain relief.
What are the possible sources of sex differences in acute pain? First, women seem to have a lower pain threshold and less tolerance to experimental pain than men.16–19 In healthy volunteers, a meta-analysis provided quantitative confirmation of this finding. For pain threshold and pain tolerance, male subjects had higher values than females for all types of noxious stimuli, although the largest effect sizes were obtained when pressure pain was compared across the sexes, followed by electrical pulses and finally thermal stimuli.18 Women exhibit greater sensitivity to laboratory pain compared with men, and this difference does not seem to be site specific.17 Using a topical capsaicin stimulation (tonic C fiber–mediated pain stimulus), Frot et al.20 showed that females rated pain as more intense and unpleasant than did males. This experimental pain model produces a mechanical hyperalgesia that also occurs during a surgical procedure. In the postoperative setting, Cepeda et al.21 showed that women exhibited more pain and had higher levels of pain intensity than men. Pain intensity on PACU arrival was significantly lower in men, whereas the pain intensity levels at the end of the study were similar. In contrast, Chia et al.22 observed no significant differences in pain intensity scores between men and women, either at rest or on movement except on the wards (second postoperative day). These authors concluded that the abdominal and thoracic surgical procedures were considered very painful and explained a similar level of pain intensity between women and men. However, this study was conducted in Taiwan with a Chinese population, and it should be noted that in other populations, pain perception and pain expression may also be explained by racial and cultural differences.22,23
Second, there are sex-related differences in the effects of opioid analgesics. In our study, the dose of postoperative morphine and the dose of perioperative sufentanil, even when these doses were normalized for body weight, were higher in women than in men. According to several authors, women seem to be more sensitive to the effects of morphine as compared with males.24–26 Numerous studies have observed that men require a 20–40% higher dose of opioids to achieve adequate pain relief.22,27–29 However, these studies were performed using patient-controlled analgesia in the postoperative setting, and the difference in analgesic consumption between men and women may be related to psychological factors or personality traits, notably opioid side effect perception, that may have affected the use of patient-controlled analgesia device.29 Moreover, a major limitation of these studies is that the analgesic effects of the opioid were not measured in the patients. The authors focused their studies on opioid consumption, but this variable may be affected by factors other than pain intensity and pain relief. Lastly, most of the opioid requirements were not adjusted to the body weight.28,29 In contrast, other authors either did not demonstrate any significant sex-related differences30 or observed that women had larger consumption of morphine than men to achieve pain relief in the postoperative setting.21 In that study, women required 0.03 mg/kg (+30%) more morphine than men. Nevertheless, in this study, the sample size was relatively low (n = 277 men), the VAS score that defined pain relief was higher (> 40 out of 100), and the time interval (10 min) between each morphine bolus has been shown to be nonoptimal.7 In healthy volunteers receiving intravenous morphine, Sarton et al.31 observed that women showed greater morphine potency but slower onset and offset of analgesic effect, suggesting that sex differences in morphine-induced analgesia have a pharmacodynamic origin. Our results support the conclusions of Sarton et al.31 who demonstrated that the potency of morphine is decreased in the early phase of its administration because of a slower onset. Nevertheless, clinical extrapolation of laboratory results in healthy volunteers should be made with caution. In that study, the pain induced was not severe and the dose of morphine administered was low.31 Regardless, our study provides evidence, based on a large population, that women need more morphine to obtain pain relief in the early postoperative period, and this result was confirmed when looking at different types of surgery (fig. 2).
One of the main results of our study is the disappearance of sex-related differences in elderly patients (fig. 2). This result suggests that gonadal steroid hormone production may influence sensitivity to opioid analgesia. Gonadal hormones are known to modulate pain intensity.32 A decrease in pain threshold and an increase in morphine consumption has been observed in women with menstrual cycles, notably during the luteal phase.33 However, no studies have been yet conducted to compare opioid analgesia at all stages of the menstrual cycle in any primate species.1 Our study, which indicates that sex-related differences disappear in elderly patients, favors the hypothesis of an important role of sexual hormones.
Some remarks must be included to assess the limitations of our study. First, the use of the VAS assumes that pain is a unidimensional experience. Although intensity is a very important dimension of pain, it is clear that pain refers to a variety of sensations that cannot be categorized under a single linguistic label that varies only in intensity.34 Nevertheless, it should be pointed out that VAS has been widely accepted because of its ease and brevity of administration, its minimal intrusiveness, and its conceptual simplicity.34 Second, the amount of morphine used to alleviate pain is not only dependent on the pharmacodynamics but also on the pharmacogenetics and pharmacokinetics. Therefore, further studies including morphine and morphine metabolite dosages are required to understand better the different morphine requirements and measurement of pain in men and women. Some evidence has been recently provided that morphine-6-glucuronide, the main and active morphine metabolism, is not involved in sex-related differences.35 Third, our results may not apply to the postoperative period after pain relief had been obtained by morphine titration. This period is more dependent on pharmacokinetics, as shown by the marked difference between elderly and young patients,36 which is not observed during intravenous morphine titration.8 Moreover, if the results of Sarton et al.31 obtained in the healthy volunteers apply to the postoperative setting, one can expect that sex-related difference in morphine consumption might be on the opposite site during this period, as previously noted.22,27–29 Further studies are required to confirm that hypothesis.
In conclusion, we observed that women experienced more pain and required greater doses of morphine than men during the immediate postoperative period to obtain pain relief. The magnitude of the increase in morphine requirements during intravenous morphine titration is estimated to be around 11%. This sex-related difference disappeared in elderly patients. Additional research in both animals and humans is required to determine whether sex differences in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of morphine are mediated by sexual steroid hormones.
We thank the nurses of the postanesthesia care unit (Department of Anesthesiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France) for their work on this study and D. J. Baker, D.M., F.R.C.A. (Department of Anesthesiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Necker-Enfants Malades, Paris, France), for reviewing the manuscript.
Back to Top | Article Outline

References

1. Craft RM: Sex differences in opioid analgesia: “From mouse to man.” Clin J Pain 2003; 19:175–86

2. Kest B, Sarton E, Dahan A: Gender differences in opioid-mediated analgesia. Anesthesiology 2000; 93:539–47

3. Rutter PC, Murphy F, Dudley HA: Morphine: Controlled trial of different methods of administration for postoperative pain relief. BMJ 1980; 280:12–3

4. Hug CC: Improving analgesic therapy. Anesthesiology 1980; 53:441–3

5. Feeley TW: The postanesthesia care unit, Anesthesia, 3rd edition, vol 3. Edited by Miller RD. New York, Churchill Livingstone, 1990, pp 2113–33

6. Upton RN, Semple TJ, Macintyre PE: Pharmacokinetic optimisation of opioid treatment in acute pain therapy. Clin Pharmacokinet 1997; 33:225–44

7. Aubrun F, Monsel S, Langeron O, Coriat P, Riou B: Postoperative titration of intravenous morphine. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2001; 18:159–65

8. Aubrun F, Monsel S, Langeron O, Coriat P, Riou B: Postoperative titration of intravenous morphine in the elderly patients. Anesthesiology 2002; 96:17–23

9. Aubrun F, Langeron O, Quesnel C, Coriat P, Riou B: Relationship between measurement of pain using visual analog score and morphine requirements during postoperative intravenous morphine titration. Anesthesiology 2003; 98:1415–21

10. Huskisson EC: Measurement of pain. Lancet 1974; 2:1127–31

11. Jensen MP, Karoly P, Braver S: The measurement of clinical pain intensity: A comparison of six methods. Pain 1986; 27:117–26

12. DeLoach LJ, Higgins MS, Caplan AB, Stigg JL: The visual analog scale in the immediate postoperative period: Intrasubject variability and correlation with a numeric scale. Anesth Analg 1998; 86:102–6

13. Ramsay MA, Savege TM, Simpson BR, Goodwin R: Controlled sedation with alphaxalone-alphadolone. BMJ 1974; 2:656–9

14. Zetlaoui PJ: Titration morphinique, Conférences d’actualisation 1999. Edited by Société Française d’Anesthésie et de Réanimation. Paris, Elsevier, 1999, pp 365–79

15. Ohnhaus EE, Adler R: Methodological problems in the measurement of pain: A comparison between the Verbal Rating Scale and the Visual Analog Scale. Pain. 1975; 1:379–84

16. Berkley KJ: Sex differences in pain. Behav Brain Sci 1997; 20:371–80

17. Fillingim RB, Maixner W: Gender differences in the responses to noxious stimuli. Pain Forum 1995; 4:209–21

18. Riley III, JL Robinson ME, Wise EA, Myers CD, Fillingim RB: Sex differences in the perception of noxious experimental stimuli: A meta-analysis. Pain 1998; 74:181–7

19. Chesterton LS, Barlas P, Foster NE, Baxter GD, Wright CC: Gender differences in pressure pain threshold in healthy humans. Pain 2003; 101: 259–66

20. Frot M, Feine JS, Bushnell MC: Sex differences in pain perception and anxiety: A psychophysical study with topical capsaicin. Pain 2004; 108:230–6

21. Cepeda MS, Carr DB: Women experienced more pain and required more morphine than men to achieve a similar degree of analgesia. Anesth Analg 2003; 97:1464–8

22. Chia YY, Chow LH, Hung CC, Liu K, Ger LP, Wang PN: Gender and pain upon movement are associated with the requirements for postoperative patient-controlled iv analgesia: A prospective survey of 2,298 Chinese patients. Can J Anesth 2002; 49:249–55

23. Sheiner EK, Sheiner E, Shoham-Vardi I, Mazor M, Katz M: Ethnic differences influence care giver’s estimates during labour. Pain 1999; 81:299–305

24. Pleym H, Spigset O, Kharasch ED, Dale O: Gender differences in drug effects: implications for anesthesiologists. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2003; 47:241–59

25. Bradbury J: Why do men and women feel and react to pain differently? Lancet 2003; 361:2052–3

26. Rollman GB: Sex makes a difference: Experimental and clinical pain responses. Clin J Pain 2003; 19:204–7

27. Tsui SL, Tong WN, Irwin M, Ng KF, Lo JR, Chan WS, Yang J: The efficacy, applicability and side-effects of postoperative intravenous patient-controlled morphine analgesia: An audit of 1233 Chinese patients. Anaesth Intensive Care 1996; 24:658–64

28. Sidebotham D, Dijkhuizen MR, Schug SA: The safety and utilization of patient-controlled analgesia. J Pain Symptom Manage 1997; 14:202–9

29. Miaskowski C, Gear RW, Levine JD: Sex-related differences in analgesic responses, Sex, Gender, and Pain: Progress in Pain Research and Management, vol 17. Edited by Fillingim RB. Seattle, IASP Press, 2000, pp 209–30

30. Miaskowski C, Levine JD: Does opioid analgesia show a gender preference for females? Pain Forum 1999; 8:34–44

31. Sarton E, Olofsen E, Romberg R, den Hartigh J, Kest B, Nieuwenhuijs D, Burm A, Teppema L, Dahan A: Sex differences in morphine analgesia: An experimental study in healthy volunteers. Anesthesiology 2000; 93:1245–54

32. Aloisi AM: Gonadal hormones and sex differences in pain reactivity. Clin J Pain 2003; 19:168–74

33. Fillingim RB, Ness TJ: The influence of menstrual cycle and sex hormones on pain responses in humans, Sex, Gender, and Pain: Progress in Pain Research and Management, vol 17. Edited by Fillingim RB. Seattle, IASP Press, 2000, pp 191–207

34. Collins SL, Moore McQuay HJA: The visual analogue pain intensity scale: What is moderate pain in millimetres? Pain 1997; 72:95–7

35. Romberg R, Olofsen E, Sarton E, den Hartigh J, Taschner PE, Dahan A: Pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic modeling of morphine-6-glucuronide–induced analgesia in healthy volunteers: Absence of differences. Anesthesiology 2004; 100:120–33

36. Aubrun F, Bunge D, Langeron O, Saillant G, Coriat P, Riou B: Postoperative morphine consumption in the elderly patient. Anesthesiology 2003; 99:160–5

Cited By:

This article has been cited 49 time(s).

American Journal of Emergency Medicine
Intravenous morphine titration to treat severe pain in the ED
Lvovschi, V; Aubrun, F; Bonnet, P; Bouchara, A; Bendahou, M; Humbert, B; Hausfater, P; Riou, B
American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 26(6): 676-682.
10.1016/j.ajem.2007.10.025
CrossRef
Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
Pain-related effects of trait anger expression: Neural substrates and the role of endogenous opioid mechanisms
Bruehl, S; Burns, JW; Chung, OY; Chont, M
Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 33(3): 475-491.
10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.12.003
CrossRef
Anesthesia and Analgesia
Ketoprofen Produces Modality-Specific Inhibition of Pain Behaviors in Rats After Plantar Incision
Spofford, CM; Ashmawi, H; Subieta, A; Buevich, F; Moses, A; Baker, M; Brennan, TJ
Anesthesia and Analgesia, 109(6): 1992-1999.
10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181bbd9a3
CrossRef
Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia
Pharmacokinetics of intra-articular morphine in horses with lipopolysaccharide-induced synovitis
Lindegaard, C; Frost, AB; Thomsen, MH; Larsen, C; Hansen, SH; Andersen, PH
Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia, 37(2): 186-195.
10.1111/j.1467-2995.2010.00526.x
CrossRef
Psychopharmacology
Association of OPRM1 A118G variant with the relative reinforcing value of nicotine
Ray, R; Jepson, C; Patterson, F; Strasser, A; Rukstalis, M; Perkins, K; Lynch, KG; O'Malley, S; Berrettini, WH; Lerman, C
Psychopharmacology, 188(3): 355-363.
10.1007/s00213-006-0504-2
CrossRef
Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association
Researchers tap into the male brain
Hampton, T
Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association, 296(): 2301-2302.

Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie
Pain relief and functional status after vaginal hysterectomy: intrathecal versus general anesthesia
Sprung, J; Sanders, MS; Warner, ME; Gebhart, JB; Stanhope, CR; Jankowski, CJ; Liedl, L; Schroeder, DR; Brown, DR; Warner, DO
Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie, 53(7): 690-700.

Presse Medicale
Assessment of early administration of abciximab in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in the emergency room
Arhan, A; Ecollan, P; Madonna-Py, M; Kergueno, J; Bennaceur, M; Josse, MO; Montalescot, G; Riou, B
Presse Medicale, 35(1): 45-50.

American Journal of Veterinary Research
Anti-inflammatory effects of intra-articular administration of morphine in horses with experimentally induced synovitis
Lindegaard, C; Gleerup, KB; Thomsen, MH; Martinussen, T; Jacobsen, S; Andersen, PH
American Journal of Veterinary Research, 71(1): 69-75.

Peptides
Endogenous opiates and behavior: 2005
Bodnar, RJ; Klein, GE
Peptides, 27(): 3391-3478.
10.1016/j.peptides.2006.07.011
CrossRef
Journal of Pain
Using the American Pain Society's patient outcome questionnaire to evaluate the quality of postoperative pain management in a sample of Norwegian patients
Dihle, A; Helseth, S; Kongsgaard, UE; Paul, SM; Miaskowski, C
Journal of Pain, 7(4): 272-280.
10.1016/j.jpain.2005.11.005
CrossRef
Pain
Intravenous morphine titration in immediate postoperative pain management: Population kinetic-pharmacodynamic and logistic regression analysis
Hammoud, HA; Simon, N; Urien, S; Riou, B; Lechat, P; Aubrun, F
Pain, 144(): 139-146.
10.1016/j.pain.2009.03.029
CrossRef
European Journal of Pain
An audit of postoperative intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with morphine: Evolution over the last decade
Cheung, CW; Ying, CLA; Lee, LHY; Tsang, SF; Tsui, SL; Irwin, MG
European Journal of Pain, 13(5): 464-471.
10.1016/j.ejpain.2008.05.013
CrossRef
Pain
Capsaicin-evoked iCGRP release from human dental pulp: A model system for the study of peripheral neuropeptide secretion in normal healthy tissue
Fehrenbacher, JC; Sun, XLX; Locke, EE; Henry, MA; Hargreaves, KM
Pain, 144(3): 253-261.
10.1016/j.pain.2009.03.027
CrossRef
British Journal of Anaesthesia
Effects of a loading dose of morphine before i.v. morphine titration for postoperative pain relief: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-control study
Aubrun, F; Amour, J; Rosenthal, D; Coriat, P; Riou, B
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 98(1): 124-130.
10.1093/bja/ael284
CrossRef
Anesthesia and Analgesia
Opioid-induced sedation in the postanesthesia care unit does not insure adequate pain relief: A case-control study
Lentschener, C; Tostivint, P; White, PF; Gentili, ME; Ozier, Y
Anesthesia and Analgesia, 105(4): 1143-1147.
10.1213/01.ane.0000281441.93304.e3
CrossRef
Anesthesia and Analgesia
Sex, gender, and pain: "Men are from mars, women are from venus ... "
Chin, ML; Rosenquist, R
Anesthesia and Analgesia, 107(1): 4-5.
10.1213/ane.0b013e3181788ca3
CrossRef
British Journal of Anaesthesia
Combination of opioid agonist and agonist-antagonist: patient-controlled analgesia requirement and adverse events among different-ratio morphine and nalbuphine admixtures for postoperative pain
Yeh, YC; Lin, TF; Lin, FS; Wang, YP; Lin, CJ; Sun, WZ
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 101(4): 542-548.
10.1093/bja/aen213
CrossRef
Anesthesia and Analgesia
Morphine in postoperative patients: Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of metabolites
Mazoit, JX; Butscher, K; Samii, K
Anesthesia and Analgesia, 105(1): 70-78.
10.1213/01.ane.0000265557.73688.32
CrossRef
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology
Intravenous sedation for cardiac procedures can be administered safely and cost-effectively by non-anesthesia personnel
Kezerashvili, A; Fisher, JD; DeLaney, J; Mushiyev, S; Monahan, E; Taylor, V; Kim, SG; Ferrick, KJ; Gross, JN; Palma, EC; Krumerman, AK
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 21(1): 43-51.
10.1007/s10840-007-9191-0
CrossRef
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Comparison of effects and plasma concentrations of opioids between elderly and middle-aged patients after cardiac surgery
Pesonen, A; Suojaranta-Ylinen, R; Hammaren, E; Tarkkila, P; Seppala, T; Rosenberg, PH
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 53(1): 101-108.
10.1111/j.1399-6576.2008.01819.x
CrossRef
Pain
Endogenous opioids may buffer effects of anger arousal on sensitivity to subsequent pain
Burns, JW; Bruehl, S; Chung, OY; Magid, E; Chont, M; Goodlad, JK; Gilliam, W; Matsuura, J; Somar, K
Pain, 146(3): 276-282.
10.1016/j.pain.2009.07.024
CrossRef
Anesthesia and Analgesia
Predictive factors of severe postoperative pain in the postanesthesia care unit
Aubrun, F; Valade, N; Coriat, P; Riou, B
Anesthesia and Analgesia, 106(5): 1535-1541.
10.1213/ane.0b013018168b2ce
CrossRef
Anesthesia and Analgesia
Sex-specific responses to opiates: Animal and human studies
Dahan, A; Kest, B; Waxman, AR; Sarton, E
Anesthesia and Analgesia, 107(1): 83-95.
10.1213/ane.0b013e31816a66a4
CrossRef
American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory Integrative and Comparative Physiology
Sex differences in morphine-induced analgesia of visceral pain are supraspinally and peripherally mediated
Ji, YP; Murphy, AZ; Traub, RJ
American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory Integrative and Comparative Physiology, 291(2): R307-R314.
10.1152/ajpregu.00824.2005
CrossRef
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Environmental and genetic factors associated with morphine response in the postoperative period
Coulbault, L; Beaussier, M; Verstuyft, C; Weickmans, H; Dubert, L; Tregouet, D; Descot, C; Parc, Y; Lienhart, A; Jaillon, P; Becquemont, L
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 79(4): 316-324.
10.1016/j.clpt.2006.01.007
CrossRef
Journal of Pain
Estrogen modulation of morphine analgesia of visceral pain in female rats is supraspinally and peripherally mediated
Ji, YP; Murphy, AZ; Traub, RJ
Journal of Pain, 8(6): 494-502.
10.1016/j.jpain.2007.01.006
CrossRef
Journal of Pain
Sex, Gender, and Pain: A Review of Recent Clinical and Experimental Findings
Fillingim, RB; King, CD; Ribeiro-Dasilva, MC; Rahim-Williams, B; Riley, JL
Journal of Pain, 10(5): 447-485.
10.1016/j.jpain.2008.12.001
CrossRef
Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia
Analgesic efficacy of intra-articular morphine in experimentally induced radiocarpal synovitis in horses
Lindegaard, C; Thomsen, MH; Larsen, S; Andersen, PH
Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia, 37(2): 171-185.
10.1111/j.1467-2995.2009.00521.x
CrossRef
Anesthesia and Analgesia
Development of acute opioid tolerance during infusion of remifentanil for pediatric scoliosis surgery
Crawford, MW; Hickey, C; Zaarour, C; Howard, A; Naser, B
Anesthesia and Analgesia, 102(6): 1662-1667.
10.1213/01.ane.0000216036.95705.c2
CrossRef
Pain
Negative affect, pain and sex: The role of endogenous opioids
Frew, AK; Drummond, PD
Pain, 132(): S77-S85.
10.1016/j.pain.2007.04.010
CrossRef
European Journal of Pain
Predicting pain and pain responses to opioids
Wilder-Smith, CH
European Journal of Pain, (): 31-37.

Anesthesia and Analgesia
The risk of severe postoperative pain: Modification and validation of a clinical prediction rule
Janssen, KJM; Kalkman, CJ; Grobbee, DE; Bonsel, GJ; Moons, KGM; Vergouwe, Y
Anesthesia and Analgesia, 107(4): 1330-1339.
10.1213/ane.0b013e31818227da
CrossRef
Neural Plasticity
The Role of the Periaqueductal Gray in the Modulation of Pain in Males and Females: Are the Anatomy and Physiology Really that Different?
Loyd, DR; Murphy, AZ
Neural Plasticity, (): -.
ARTN 462879
CrossRef
British Journal of Anaesthesia
Postoperative pain after hip fracture is procedure specific
Foss, NB; Kristensen, MT; Palm, H; Kehlet, H
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 102(1): 111-116.
10.1093/bja/aen345
CrossRef
Brain Behavior and Immunity
Sex and gender in psychoneuroimmunology research: Past, present and future
Darnall, BD; Suarez, EC
Brain Behavior and Immunity, 23(5): 595-604.
10.1016/j.bbi.2009.02.019
CrossRef
Molecular Pain
Sex differences in opioid analgesia and addiction: interactions among opioid receptors and estrogen receptors
Lee, CWS; Ho, IK
Molecular Pain, 9(): -.
ARTN 45
CrossRef
Obesity Surgery
Gender-Related Difference in Postoperative Pain After Laparoscopic Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass in Morbidly Obese Patients
Zeidan, A; Al-Temyatt, S; Mowafi, H; Ghattas, T
Obesity Surgery, 23(): 1880-1884.
10.1007/s11695-013-0996-x
CrossRef
Anesthesiology
An Analysis of Patient Variables That Influence Intravenous Patient-controlled Analgesic Use of Morphine with Quantile Regression
Yen, C; Tsou, M; Mandell, MS; Chan, C; Chan, K; Chen, TH; Chang, K
Anesthesiology, 112(3): 688-695.
10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181cbd1f3
PDF (282) | CrossRef
Anesthesiology
Fascia Iliaca Compartment Blockade for Acute Pain Control in Hip Fracture Patients: A Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial
Foss, NB; Kristensen, BB; Bundgaard, M; Bak, M; Heiring, C; Virkelyst, C; Hougaard, S; Kehlet, H
Anesthesiology, 106(4): 773-778.
10.1097/01.anes.0000264764.56544.d2
PDF (549) | CrossRef
Anesthesiology
A Comparison of Change in the 0–10 Numeric Rating Scale to a Pain Relief Scale and Global Medication Performance Scale in a Short-term Clinical Trial of Breakthrough Pain Intensity
Farrar, J; Polomano, R; Berlin, J; Strom, B
Anesthesiology, 112(6): 1464-1472.
10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181de0e6d
PDF (1149) | CrossRef
Anesthesiology
Predictors of Postoperative Pain and Analgesic Consumption: A Qualitative Systematic Review
Ip, HY; Abrishami, A; Peng, PW; Wong, J; Chung, F
Anesthesiology, 111(3): 657-677.
10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181aae87a
PDF (1171) | CrossRef
Anesthesiology
Strain and Sex Influence on Pain Sensitivity after Plantar Incision in the Mouse
Banik, RK; Woo, YC; Park, SS; Brennan, TJ
Anesthesiology, 105(6): 1246-1253.

PDF (2364)
Critical Care Medicine
Influence of renal dysfunction on the accuracy of procalcitonin for the diagnosis of postoperative infection after vascular surgery
Amour, J; Birenbaum, A; Langeron, O; Le Manach, Y; Bertrand, M; Coriat, P; Riou, B; Bernard, M; Hausfater, P
Critical Care Medicine, 36(4): 1147-1154.
10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181692966
PDF (690) | CrossRef
The Clinical Journal of Pain
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Pilot Study of IV Morphine-6-Glucuronide for Postoperative Pain Relief After Knee Replacement Surgery
Romberg, R; van Dorp, E; Hollander, J; Kruit, M; Binning, A; Smith, T; Dahan, A
The Clinical Journal of Pain, 23(3): 197-203.
10.1097/AJP.0b013e31802b4f6a
PDF (129) | CrossRef
The Clinical Journal of Pain
Response to Morphine in Male and Female Patients: Analgesia and Adverse Events
Bijur, PE; Esses, D; Birnbaum, A; Chang, AK; Schechter, C; Gallagher, EJ
The Clinical Journal of Pain, 24(3): 192-198.
10.1097/AJP.0b013e31815d3619
PDF (195) | CrossRef
The Clinical Journal of Pain
The Exploration of the Establishment of Cutpoints to Categorize the Severity of Acute Postoperative Pain
Dihle, A; Helseth, S; Paul, SM; Miaskowski, C
The Clinical Journal of Pain, 22(7): 617-624.
10.1097/01.ajp.0000210905.57546.c1
PDF (126) | CrossRef
European Journal of Anaesthesiology (EJA)
Pharmacogenomics and anaesthesia: explaining the variability in response to opiates
Sweeney, BP
European Journal of Anaesthesiology (EJA), 24(3): 209&hyhen;212.
10.1017/S0265021506002316
PDF (60) | CrossRef
European Journal of Anaesthesiology (EJA)
Age‐adapted morphine titration produces equivalent analgesia and adverse effects in younger and older patients
Keïta, H; Tubach, F; Maalouli, J; Desmonts, J; Mantz, J
European Journal of Anaesthesiology (EJA), 25(5): 352-356.
10.1017/S0265021507003080
PDF (84) | CrossRef
Back to Top | Article Outline

© 2005 American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc.

Publication of an advertisement in Anesthesiology Online does not constitute endorsement by the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc. or Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. of the product or service being advertised.
Login

Article Tools

Images

Share