The load dependence of the myocardial performance index in congenital heart disease has been evaluated. No significant change was found before or after surgical correction of atrial septal defect (right ventricular preload), pulmonic stenosis (right ventricular afterload), or congenitally corrected transposition of the great vessels (right ventricular preload and afterload).1
Acute changes in myocardial performance index with manipulation of preload/afterload have been demonstrated in adult volunteers with healthy hearts—to Valsalva maneuver, leg lifting, and nitroglycerine administration. However, the patients in this study with previous myocardial infarction and abnormal ventricular function did not exhibit any changes in myocardial performance index.2
Doppler tissue imaging has load dependence3,4
but has been demonstrated to be more independent of preload than conventional Doppler measures of mitral inflow.5,6
In addition, in patients with ventricular dysfunction, changes in preload affect Doppler tissue imaging velocities much less and correlate well with invasive measures of left ventricular diastolic pressure.6
Significant increases in afterload seen in patients with aortic stenosis do decrease Doppler tissue imaging velocity.7
However, no significant impact on Doppler tissue imaging velocities of increased left ventricular preload with ventricular septal defects was noted.
With regard to the loading conditions for the patients in our current study,8
preload was not specifically assessed, largely because of the inability to use conventional methods to compute left ventricular end-diastolic volume, because of the irregular geometry of the functional single ventricle. Central venous pressure, a rough estimate of preload, was not changed with either of the two anesthetic levels with the two regimens we studied. In a previous study of two-ventricle patients with congenital heart disease, we demonstrated that neither fentanyl-midazolam nor sevoflurane, in doses similar to those used in the current study, had any effect on left ventricular end-diastolic volume measured by the biplane method of Simpson.9
In the same previous study, neither fentanyl-midazolam nor sevoflurane changed systemic vascular resistance index, calculated echocardiographically. In the current study, we did not specifically calculate systemic vascular resistance index because the patients had a functional single ventricle, and systemic and pulmonary blood flow both occurred in the aorta of most patients, so the conventional concept of systemic vascular resistance did not apply. However, if one was to calculate a combined systemic and pulmonary vascular resistance index in the patients of our current study, by dividing the difference between mean arterial pressure and central venous pressure (assuming no change in central venous pressure from baseline) by the aortic or neoaortic outflow, there is no change in systemic and pulmonary vascular resistance index with fentanyl-midazolam but a significant decrease with sevoflurane at both anesthetic levels (table 1
Therefore, the changes in loading conditions induced by the anesthetic regimens for congenital heart disease can be estimated to be no change with fentanyl-midazolam and a 17% decrease in afterload with sevoflurane.
Although we agree with the caution of Drs. Poelaert and Amà to consider changes in loading conditions and other pathophysiologic factors when performing and interpreting echocardiographic studies assessing response to anesthetics, we believe our conclusions are valid for single-ventricle infants. Myocardial performance index in particular represents an appropriate method to assess myocardial function in patients with abnormal ventricular geometry, such as those with a functional single ventricle.
Dean B. Andropoulos, M.D., *
Benjamin W. Eidem, M.D.
Wanda C. Miller-Hance, M.D.
Louis I. Bezold, M.D.
* Baylor College of Medicine/Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas. email@example.com
1. Eidem BW, O'Leary PW, Tei C, Seward JB: Usefulness of the myocardial performance index for assessing right ventricular function in congenital heart disease. Am J Cardiol 2000; 86:654–8
2. Moller JE, Poulsen SH, Egstrup K: Effect of preload alterations on a new Doppler echocardiographic index of combined systolic and diastolic performance. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1999; 12:1065–72
3. Firstenberg MS, Greenberg NL, Main ML, Drinko KJ, Odabashian JA, Thomas JD, Garcia MJ: Determinants of diastolic myocardial tissue Doppler velocities: influences of relaxation and preload. J Appl Physiol 2001; 90:299–307
4. Dincer I, Kumbasar D, Nergisoglu G, Atmack Y, Kutlay S, Akyurek O, Sayin T, Erol C, Oral D: Assessment of left ventricular diastolic function with Doppler tissue imaging: effects of preload and place of measurements. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2002; 18:155–60
5. Sohn DW, Chai IH, Lee DJ, Kim HC, Kim HS, Oh BH, Lee MM, Park YB, Choi YS, Seo JD, Lee YW: Assessment of mitral annulus velocity by Doppler tissue imaging in the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 30:474–80
6. Nagueh SF, Sun H, Kopelen HA, Middleton KJ, Khoury DS: Hemodynamic determinants of the mitral annulus diastolic velocities by tissue Doppler. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37:278–85
7. Eidem BW, McMahon CJ, Ayres NA, Kovalchin JP, Denfield SJ, Altman CA, Bezold LI, Pignatelli RH: Clinical impact of altered left ventricular loading conditions on Doppler tissue imaging velocities: A study in congenital heart disease. J Am Soc Echo 2005; (in press)
8. Ikemba CM, Su JT, Stayer SA, Miller-Hance WC, Eidem BW, Bezold LI, Hall SR, Havemann LM, Andropoulos DB: Myocardial performance index with sevoflurane-pancuronium versus fentanyl-midazolam-pancuronium in infants with a functional single ventricle. Anesthesiology 2004; 101:1298–305
9. Rivenes SM, Lewin MB, Stayer SA, Bent ST, Schoenig HM, McKenzie ED, Fraser CD, Andropoulos DB: Cardiovascular effects of sevoflurane, isoflurane, halothane, and fentanyl-midazolam in children with congenital heart disease: An echocardiographic study of myocardial contractility and hemodynamics. Anesthesiology 2001; 94:223–9
© 2005 American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc.