Skip Navigation LinksHome > August 2004 - Volume 101 - Issue 2 > The Pharmacologic Treatment of Muscle Pain
Anesthesiology:
Review Article

The Pharmacologic Treatment of Muscle Pain

Cohen, Steven P. M.D.*; Mullings, Rohan M.D.†; Abdi, Salahadin M.D., Ph.D.‡
Section Editor(s): Warltier, David C. M.D., Ph.D., Editor

Free Access
Article Outline
Collapse Box

Author Information

MYOFASCIAL pain is a significant source of discomfort in individuals with regional pain symptomatology. The prevalence of myofascial pain ranges from around 20% in patients with chronic low back pain (LBP)1 to 30% in patients with regional pain complaints seen in primary care clinics2 to upward of 85% in patients presenting to specialized pain management centers.3
To understand the origin of myofascial pain, it is first necessary to possess a fundamental understanding of two related concepts, muscle tension and trigger points (TPs). Muscle tension is the product of two distinct factors: viscoelastic tone and contractile activity.4 Viscoelastic tone can be classified into two parts, elastic stiffness and viscoelastic stiffness. Both of these can be quantified only in the absence of electromyographic activity. Elastic stiffness is a function of distance moved, whereas viscoelastic stiffness considers the effect of velocity.
Contractile activity is composed of three different subunits: contracture (no electromyographic activity), electrogenic spasm (pathologic), and electrogenic stiffness (normal). Contractures originate endogenously within muscle fibers independent of electromyographic activity. Electrogenic spasm refers to involuntary, pathologic contractions arising from the electrical activity occurring in alpha motor neurons and motor endplates. Electrogenic stiffness refers to muscle tension that derives from electrogenic muscle contraction in individuals who are not relaxed. The latter two terms are associated with measurable electromyographic activity.
Trigger points are defined as taut bands of muscle that produce pain in characteristic reference zones. These taut bands of contracted muscle can be classified into two main types, active TPs and latent TPs, the latter of which is more common. Depending on the pain condition, and even within certain subgroups of soft tissue disorders, muscle pain may be associated with TPs, increased muscle tension, or various combinations of these pathologic processes. Common clinical conditions in which muscle pain is caused primarily by spasm include torticollis, trismus, and nocturnal leg cramps. A painful condition that is defined by the presence of active TPs is myofascial pain syndrome (MPS). Tension headache and temporomandibular disorder (TMD) are conditions that may be associated with both increased muscle tone and TPs.
Other mechanisms and physiologic processes can contribute to muscle pain in addition to tone and TPs. These include but are not limited to increased metabolism or diminished perfusion leading to local ischemia, peripheral and central sensitization, and autonomic hyperactivity.5,6 Not infrequently, psychogenic factors are found to play a role in soft tissue disorders.7,8
Although local anesthetic TP injections have been advocated in the treatment of a wide variety of myofascial pain disorders including tension headache, MPS, TMD, and LBP,9 these injections are beyond the scope of this review article. Fibromyalgia, which shares some characteristics with myofascial pain but which the authors consider a disorder of sensory processing,10 will also not be considered. MPS is considered to be a distinct disorder with major and minor diagnostic criteria, and the authors will limit the use of this term to the syndrome outlined by Simons.11 The term myofascial pain is used more broadly and refers to soft tissue pain of unclear etiology.
Back to Top | Article Outline

Study Populations, Limitations, and Search Methods

There are several inherent limitations in a review of the pharmacologic management of muscle pain. First, myofascial pain represents a heterogeneous group of disorders, each characterized by its own unique pathophysiology. There are considerable differences in the mechanisms underlying acute muscle injury such as occurs with muscle tears and succinylcholine-induced myalgia and those responsible for chronic conditions in which muscles play a role, such as MPS and TMD. Second, different mechanisms of nociception may exist even within a particular subgroup. For example, in TMD, the primary source of pain is myogenous in some patients and arthrogenous in others. Many clinical investigators have not or perhaps could not distinguish between different pain generators. Other examples of disorders for which this problem exists include LBP and tension-type/muscle contraction headaches. Third, because the category of muscle pain itself so broad, so too are the drugs used to treat it. For some agents, such as topical nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and quinine, the indications for use are relatively narrow, but for drug classes that act on a broad range of systems, such as antidepressants, their antinociceptive effects are not limited to myofascial pain. Unfortunately, most clinical studies are not capable of distinguishing between pain relief that results from central analgesic effects and those that are due to peripheral mechanisms.
The evidence for involvement (or lack thereof in the case of fibromyalgia) of muscle pain in the most common medical conditions mentioned in this article is reviewed in the appendix. These include fibromyalgia, tension-type headache, MPS, TMD, LBP, and muscle cramps. The studies evaluated were obtained via a MEDLINE search from 1966 through March 2004 using the limit clinical trial and a bibliographic review of these articles. Only human studies in which muscle seemed to play a significant role in the pathogenesis of pain were considered. Heterogeneous and variable, the study populations for each cited article are outlined in the accompanying tables. For drugs in which there was a lack of controlled trials for muscle pain, uncontrolled studies were considered. This review is neither quantitative (statistical pooling) nor qualitative (best evidence synthesis). Evidence for the efficacy of each drug class in muscle pain was classified as strong, moderate, limited, conflicting, or no evidence. Finally, it must be remembered that pharmacologic treatment is best considered as an adjuvant to a multimodal therapeutic approach when treating muscle pain. The multidisciplinary treatment of myofascial pain should also consider noninvasive treatments such as biofeedback and relaxation training, lifestyle alteration, psychological counseling, alternative treatments such as acupuncture, invasive procedures such as TP injections, and for some conditions, even surgical intervention. Considering these limitations, the purpose of this article is to review the wide range of pharmacologic treatment options available for acute and chronic painful conditions in humans in which muscle pathology is believed to play a significant role.
Back to Top | Article Outline
Mechanisms of Muscle Pain
Unlike cutaneous pain for which there exists a plethora of experimental research and animal models, there is a relative lack of basic science and clinical data available for deep tissue pain, which is more clinically relevant. Muscle pain is generally described as a deep, achy, cramping-like sensation in contrast to the sharp, localized characteristics of cutaneous pain. This pain is often poorly localized by patients. Convergent afferent input from skin, joints, and viscera to the spinothalamic tract and other ascending pain pathways may cause misinterpretation of information arising from Aδ- and C-fiber polymodal muscle nociceptors, as is the case with other types of referred pain.
Pain in response to muscle injury is transmitted by the same basic pathways as those involved for other somatic structures. After a noxious stimulus, an inflammatory response occurs, which results in the accumulation of neuropeptides and inflammatory cells via chemotaxis. Release of these peptides results in altered excitability of sensory and sympathetic nerve fibers and the release of chemical mediators. These substances act to sensitize high-threshold nociceptors, a phenomenon known as peripheral sensitization. This manifests as spontaneous pain and tenderness after acute muscle injury.
Just as prolonged stimulation of nociceptors can lead to altered pain states (peripheral sensitization), so too can repetitive stimulation of second- and higher-order neurons (central sensitization). In a study by Wright et al.12 assessing the temporal summation of painful stimuli in skin, joint, and muscle, summation was most pronounced in muscle tissue, illustrating the underappreciated role deep tissues play in the development and maintenance of central sensitization. Hyperalgesia may be more likely to occur in small rather than large muscles, which may explain why TMD is so common.13 Central sensitization may also be responsible for referred pain. Hoheisel et al.14 found that the injection of bradykinin into one muscle in rats unmasked receptive fields in other muscles. These findings may partially explain the phenomenon of referred pain after muscle injury. Peripheral mechanisms are primarily responsible for the pain experienced after acute muscle injury, but central mechanisms are believed to predominate in chronic muscle pain disorders, such as chronic tension-type headache and TMD.
Back to Top | Article Outline
Tricyclic Antidepressants
In the 1960s, clinical studies began to show that tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) contain analgesic properties independent of their antidepressant effects.15,16 The effects of TCAs on central and peripheral pathways modulating pain are widespread and profound, extending beyond the modulation of neural transmission by norepinephrine and serotonin reuptake inhibition. For a review of these properties, readers are referred to the work of Eschalier et al.17,18 and Cohen and Abdi.19
The pain-relieving properties of TCAs have been extensively studied in a wide array of clinical contexts, including several disorders involving a myofascial component. In a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial conducted to assess the tertiary amine TCA dothiepin, a sulfur-containing analog of amitriptyline, in 93 patients with chronic atypical facial pain and arthromyalgia, 71% of patients in the treatment group became pain-free after 9 weeks versus 47% in the placebo group.20 At their 1-yr follow-up, 68 (81%) of the 84 patients who elected to continue treatment with the drug were pain free. In a similar study by Sharav et al.21 in 28 patients with chronic facial pain, most of whom had evidence of musculoskeletal dysfunction, the administration of both low-dose (≤ 30 mg) and high-dose (≤ 150 mg) amitriptyline was found to reduce pain intensity significantly compared with placebo. No dose–response relation for analgesia was noted. In an uncontrolled study evaluating the effect of low-dose amitriptyline (10–30 mg) in patients with TMD, subjects in both the myofascial and mixed (both myofascial and joint problems) groups had improved visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores 6 weeks after treatment.22 At their 1-yr follow-up, pain relief in both groups had significantly declined, with the myofascial patients faring worse than the mixed group. In this study and the study of Sharav et al.,21 scores on the Beck and Hamilton Depression Inventories were reduced in depressed patients but not in nondepressed people during TCA treatment.
Table 1
Table 1
Image Tools
Previous studies have shown TCAs to be effective tools in the management of tension headaches.15,23 In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, three-way crossover study by Bendtsen and Jensen,24 intermediate doses of amitriptyline (75 mg/day) significantly reduced myofascial scalp tenderness and headache intensity compared with the serotonin-specific reuptake inhibitor citalopram and placebo. Interestingly, amitriptyline had no effect on either pressure or electrical pain thresholds. In summary, there is strong evidence for the use of TCAs in tension-type headaches and facial pain/TMD, which is likely because of the central and peripheral analgesic effects of these drugs. There is no evidence for their use in other myofascial pain conditions (table 1).
Back to Top | Article Outline
Anticonvulsants
Anticonvulsants relieve pain by suppressing abnormal neuronal discharges and increasing the threshold for nerve activation. Different anticonvulsants are effective in different pain contexts, but as a general rule, antiseizure medications are more effective in neuropathic pain states than in acute and chronic nociceptive pain.25 These neurogenic conditions tend to be characterized by sharp, lancinating pain and electrical-like sensations rather than the dull, aching discomfort typically seen with soft tissue pain.
Chronic daily headache is a clinical condition in which the patient experiences daily or near daily headaches, lasting 4 or more hours, for at least 15 days each month.26 Studies have shown that a majority of patients with chronic daily headache have at least a component of tension-type headache,27 a condition many believe involves muscle pathology. In an open-label study evaluating low-dose gabapentin in 21 patients with chronic daily headache, 19% of patients rated the treatment as excellent, 48% rated it as good, and one third rated it as either fair or poor.28 The outcome measure in this small, uncontrolled, prospective study was “patient impression of change.” In a similar, open-label study assessing the use of sodium valproate in 30 patients with persistent chronic daily headaches unresponsive to other interventions, two thirds of patients improved significantly.29 Commonly experienced adverse effects included weight gain, tremor, hair loss, and nausea.
Table 2
Table 2
Image Tools
The effects of gabapentin in chronic pain states were studied by Rosenberg et al.30 in 97 patients with neuropathic pain, 16 patients with chronic LBP, and 9 patients with myofascial pain by means of a retrospective chart review. A significant decrease in VAS pain scores was found in the neuropathic pain group (7.3 to 5.4; P < 0.0001) and the myofascial group (7.2 to 6.4; P = 0.04) but not the LBP group. Serrao et al.31 evaluated the use of moderate doses (mean peak dose, 892 ± 180 mg) of gabapentin in an open-label study involving 30 patients with a variety of different diseases who had muscle cramps. Gabapentin was found to have significantly reduced muscle cramps at the first 2-week follow-up visit; by 3 months, cramps had resolved in 100% of patients, an effect that lasted throughout the 6-month treatment period. In the 10 patients who were followed up during the 3-month washout period, the mean number of muscle cramps remained significantly lower than the number of cramps recorded during the qualification phase. In an interesting prospective, randomized trial designed to assess the ability of phenytoin to reduce succinylcholine-induced myalgia, both phenytoin and tubocurarine pretreatment decreased fasciculations, but only phenytoin reduced postoperative myalgia.32 The evidence for the use of anticonvulsants in muscle pain is extremely limited based on existing studies. The results of mostly uncontrolled studies indicate further research is necessary before any conclusions can be made (table 2).
Back to Top | Article Outline
Skeletal Muscle Relaxants
The mechanism of analgesia for skeletal muscle relaxants is not fully known. Animal studies have shown that skeletal muscle relaxants do not act at the neuromuscular junction, nor do they have any direct effect on skeletal muscle fibers. These drugs are believed to exert their effects primarily within the brain, although some also act at spinal motor neurons. Clinically, skeletal muscle relaxants relieve muscle spasm of local origin without interfering with muscle function.
Not surprisingly, there have been a substantial number of clinical studies evaluating skeletal muscle relaxants in myofascial pain conditions. In an often cited study by Brown and Womble33 comparing cyclobenzaprine to diazepam and placebo in patients with chronic neck and LBP aggravated by muscle spasm, both treatment arms experienced greater pain relief than the placebo group. There were more adverse effects in the cyclobenzaprine group, with the three most common being dry mouth, drowsiness, and dizziness. In two other randomized, placebo-controlled trials assessing the effectiveness of cyclobenzaprine for muscle spasm and pain in the lumbar and cervical spine regions, Bercel34 and Basmajian35 both found significant clinical improvement in patients taking the muscle relaxant. Both of these studies used patient self-report and muscle spasm algometry as outcome measures. The magnitude of improvement in the cyclobenzaprine group was found to be greater than with diazepam in the Basmajian study. Follow-up time in both studies was less than 1 month.
Schwartz et al.36 performed a double-blind, placebo-controlled study on the effects of carisoprodol in TMD in one of the oldest studies evaluating muscle relaxants in myofascial pain. Carisoprodol, a precursor of the sedative-hypnotic meprobamate, is purported to produce muscle relaxation by blocking interneuronal activity in the descending reticular formation and spinal cord. In this study, with a follow-up period of 1 week, no difference was found between treatment and control groups. In a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial completed in the early 1970s comparing the sedative/muscle relaxant meprobamate in myofascial pain-dysfunction syndrome (i.e., TMD), Greene and Laskin37 reported a significant improvement in subjective complaints in patients given meprobamate. In a more recent double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of adding a nighttime dose of either cyclobenzaprine or clonazepam to a patient education and self-care program in patients with TMD and MPS, cyclobenzaprine was found to be superior to both placebo and clonazepam in the primary outcome measure of jaw pain on awakening.38 No difference was found in the quality of sleep between groups, and the benzodiazepine clonazepam was no more effective than placebo. In fact, all three groups showed a statistically significant decrease in jaw pain between their pretreatment and posttreatment VAS pain scores, which is consistent with the widely held belief that psychological factors play a role in this disorder. The latter finding is in conflict with other research showing that benzodiazepines are effective for chronic orofacial pain of myogenic origin.39
In a meta-analysis reviewing 14 studies on the use of cyclobenzaprine for back pain, Browning et al.40 found the muscle relaxant to be more effective than placebo, especially in the first 4 days of treatment. All 14 studies focused on LBP with muscle spasm, with 5 also including data on neck pain. Eleven of the studies considered only patients with acute back pain; 3 studied patients with reports of chronic pain.
There have been numerous clinical studies demonstrating the effectiveness of the muscle relaxant tizanidine in patients with cervical and lumbar pain. In a randomized, double-blind study comparing tizanidine with diazepam in patients with acute paravertebral muscle spasm, tizanidine was found to provide relief comparable with that of diazepam, while being better tolerated.41 Similar positive results were obtained by Lepisto,42 who compared tizanidine to placebo in patients with painful muscle spasm after lumbar disk surgery. Results have been mixed for tension-type headaches. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study and an open-label trial both found tizanidine to be an effective treatment for tension-type headaches,43,44 but another study found no difference between sustained-release tizanidine and placebo.45
Spasticity that results from lesions in the central nervous system is a frequent cause of muscle pain. In a Cochrane review of pharmacologic interventions for patients with spinal cord injury–related spasticity,46 the authors concluded that only intrathecal baclofen, which showed a positive effect in both of two studies analyzed,47,48 was effective in reducing spasticity. In the largest and only placebo-controlled trial on tizanidine,49 Ashworth scores measuring spasticity were found to be significantly lower in patients taking the muscle relaxant. A significant reduction was noted only in the early treatment phase for muscle spasm.
In a similar Cochrane review of patients with multiple sclerosis,50 the authors concluded that no definitive recommendations could be made because of the negative outcomes and poor methodology of the studies analyzed. However, in one of the randomized trials comparing oral baclofen with placebo, a significant reduction in painful muscle spasm and improved range of motion were noted in the baclofen group.51 No significant reductions in muscle spasm were noted in the two placebo-controlled trials assessing tizanidine.52,53
Table 3
Table 3
Image Tools
Table 3
Table 3
Image Tools
Table 3
Table 3
Image Tools
Dantrolene sodium is a muscle relaxant best known for its efficacy in treating malignant hyperthermia, but it has also been shown to be an effective treatment for myalgia. In a double-blind study comparing dantrolene sodium with placebo in 30 athletes with painful muscle contractures, 71% of patients in the treatment group versus 21% taking placebo reported decreased muscle pain at rest.54 These percentages were 79% and 36%, respectively, for movement pain. Similar beneficial effects have been reported in a patient who developed severe muscle spasm after teeth extraction,55 in patients with muscular dystrophy,56 and in a randomized, controlled trial evaluating the preoperative use of dantrolene in succinylcholine-induced myalgia.57 Overall, there is strong evidence for the efficacy of muscle relaxants in muscle spasm involving the cervical and lower lumbar region and in TMD. The evidence is either conflicting (tension headache) or limited (muscle cramps) for other conditions containing a myofascial component (table 3).
Back to Top | Article Outline
5-Hydroxytryptamine Agonists
The analgesic efficacy of drugs that increase serum serotonin concentrations by inhibiting neurotransmitter reuptake has been well documented in a wide variety of pain conditions (see Antidepressants). The analgesic properties of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) agonists such as sumatriptan, a mainstay of treatment for migraines, have been less studied. Sumatriptan has been shown in clinical studies not only to abort migraines, but also to relieve tension-type headaches.58,59 The precise mechanisms for this effect are unclear, but it may be due to overlapping etiologies between different types of headaches. That is, although nociception in tension headaches is primarily myofascial, vascular input and even supraspinal facilitation may play a role.60 In a study by Bono et al.61 evaluating the 5-HT precursor l-hydroxytryptophan in patients with headache, the authors observed a similar therapeutic effect for migraine and tension headaches.
Table 4
Table 4
Image Tools
Some researchers have attempted to treat facial pain with sumatriptan because of its modulating effect on nociceptive input in the central nervous system and trigeminal nuclei. In a small (n = 7), randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study evaluating oral sumatriptan in myofascial pain of the temporal muscles, both sumatriptan and placebo reduced pain intensity, with no significant differences occurring between groups.62 Six of the seven patients reported no interest in retaking the medication. In a similarly designed study involving 19 patients with atypical facial pain given 6 mg subcutaneous sumatriptan, Harrison et al.63 found that patients taking sumatriptan showed a small, temporary reduction in sensory pain 120 min after treatment and in the affective manifestations of pain 60 and 120 min after treatment. Eighty-three percent of patients had reactions they considered to be moderate to severe. The high incidence of adverse effects and the small, transient improvement of pain led the authors to conclude that sumatriptan is not an appropriate treatment for atypical facial pain. Interestingly, in a double-blind study comparing the 5-HT2 antagonist ritanserin to amitriptyline in patients with depression and chronic tension-type headaches, Nappi et al.64 found the two treatments to be comparable. In summary, there is no evidence to support the clinical use of 5-HT agonists in myofascial pain conditions. Even in patients with tension-type headaches, the high incidence of adverse effects, including medication-overuse headaches, precludes its use on a regular basis (table 4).
Back to Top | Article Outline
Calcium Channel Blockers
Calcium channels of the N, P, and Q types have all been implicated in pain perception. Of these, the best studied is the N-type calcium channel, localized to terminals on sensory nerve fibers. In clinical studies, both N- and L-type calcium channel blockers have been shown to produce analgesia when injected neuraxially.65–67
There have been few clinical studies assessing calcium channel blockers in myofascial pain. In two open-label trials, the calcium antagonist flunarizine was shown to be an effective treatment over a 6-month period in patients with migraine interval headache (i.e., transformed migraine), a headache that frequently contains a significant myofascial component.68,69 However, in a double-blind crossover study evaluating the effect of the calcium channel blocker nifedipine in the prophylaxis of migraine and tension headaches, whereas 71.4% of the migraineurs obtained a satisfactory response, only 28.6% of the patients with tension headaches experienced significant relief of symptoms (P = NS).70
Muscle cramps can be a considerable source of discomfort, especially in patients undergoing hemodialysis. In a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial evaluating nifedipine in 19 hemodialysis patients with muscle cramps, Peer et al.71 found that patients in the nifedipine group obtained significant pain relief. In an open-label trial evaluating verapamil in elderly patients with nocturnal leg cramps unresponsive to quinine sulfate, Baltodano et al.72 reported relief in seven of eight patients. In short, there is no evidence for the use of calcium channel blockers in the treatment of soft tissue disorders other than muscle cramps, for which the evidence is limited (table 4).
Back to Top | Article Outline
α-Adrenergic Antagonists
In healthy subjects, muscle blood flow increases in response to stressful events,73 a phenomenon that can be further enhanced by the administration of an α-blocking agent.74 To determine whether muscle perfusion similarly increases in patients with myofascial pain, Acero et al.75 compared the intramuscular hemodynamic changes in response to a cold pressor stimulus between patients with chronic trapezius muscle pain and control subjects. The authors found a significant decrease in muscle perfusion in the patients with muscle pain when compared with control subjects, a finding supported by other investigators.76 This may indicate an impaired ability to vasodilate intramuscular vasculature in these patients.
The analgesic effects of drugs affecting the sympathetic nervous system have not been extensively studied in humans. Denaro et al.77 conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled study comparing the efficacy of the α2 agonist clonidine with the tetracyclic antidepressant mianserin, a drug possessing significant α-adrenergic blocking activity, in patients with tension and migraine headaches. The investigators found that whereas mianserin decreased headache frequency and intensity in both groups at 90 days (in the migraine group, headache frequency was increased during the first 30 days), clonidine decreased headache intensity only in migraine patients.
Following up on a previous study indicating that head-up tilt in hemodialysis patients with frequent muscle cramps results in greater increases in plasma norepinephrine concentrations than in patients with infrequent cramps,78 Sidhom et al.79 evaluated the effect of administering low-dose prazosin at the start of hemodialysis in a double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial. The authors demonstrated that patients experienced a 58% reduction in muscle cramping when pretreated with prazosin (P = 0.03). Not surprisingly, intradialytic hypotension was noted to occur more frequently after administration of prazosin. In summary, there is no clinical evidence supporting the use of sympathetic blocking agents in myofascial pain (table 4).
Back to Top | Article Outline
Opioids and Tramadol
The importance of peripherally located receptors in mediating analgesia by opioids is becoming better appreciated,80 but the predominant pain-relieving effects of these drugs are still widely believed to reside in the central nervous system. Some opioids, such as methadone, which inhibits the reuptake of serotonin and norepinephrine and acts as an antagonist at N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors, exhibit additional analgesic properties not mediated through opioid receptors.81
Tramadol is an orally and parenterally active binary analgesic that possesses opioid and nonopioid mechanisms of action. Tramadol binds with modest activity to mu opioid receptors, with an affinity approximately 1/6,000 that of morphine. The drug has even weaker affinity for κ and σ receptors. In addition to its opioid properties, tramadol also weakly inhibits the reuptake of serotonin and norepinephrine. The opioid and nonopioid mechanisms of tramadol interact synergistically to relieve pain.82
There have been few studies assessing the efficacy of opioids in myofascial pain states and none involving tramadol. However, clinical studies support its efficacy in chronic LBP, a disorder that often contains a myofascial component, and fibromyalgia, a syndrome bearing clinical similarities to MPS.83,84
Table 5
Table 5
Image Tools
In a randomized, double-blind crossover trial, Moulin et al.85 examined the effect of sustained-release morphine versus an active placebo on pain and quality of life in 46 patients with chronic regional pain of soft tissue or musculoskeletal origin (excluding headache patients) who had not benefitted from previous trials with NSAIDs, TCAs, and codeine. The authors found that whereas morphine was more effective at relieving pain than benztropine, it did not yield any psychological or functional improvement. In this study, all patients were compliant with their medication regimens, and none exhibited drug-seeking behavior. List et al.86 assessed the effect of 1.0- and 0.1-mg intraarticular morphine injections versus saline in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study involving 53 patients with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) arthralgias or arthritis. The authors found a significant decrease in VAS pain score at maximum mouth opening 5 days after the injection in the 0.1-mg group but not the 1.0-mg group. Although statistically significant, this diminution in pain score was not clinically relevant. In the immediate postinjection period, pain was reduced in all treatment groups, without a significant difference between them. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study involving 51 patients with chronic tension headache, Friedman87 compared Fiorinal (Sandoz Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ) with codeine to each medicine individually and a placebo control group up to 4 h after ingestion. The combination medication was found to be better than each medication alone, which in turn were superior to placebo for both pain relief and the ability to perform activities of daily living. The authors did not statistically analyze the results for codeine versus Fiorinal, but the codeine group seemed to fare slightly better. This is in contrast to a randomized, double-blind trial by Harden et al.,88 who found intramuscular ketorolac to be more effective in the treatment of tension headache than intramuscular meperidine and promethazine. Patients receiving the combination opioid–antihistamine treatment fared no better than those given placebo. When analyzing studies comparing drug combinations, caution must be used in extrapolating the results to conclusions about individual medications, given the drug interactions and other factors that are not controlled for. In summary, the evidence to support the use of tramadol or opioids in the treatment of any myofascial pain condition is extremely limited and conflicting (table 5).
Back to Top | Article Outline
Benzodiazepines
In the late 1970s and early 1980s, several studies were published comparing diazepam to the muscle relaxants cyclobenzaprine and tizanidine for cervical and lumbar paravertebral muscle spasm.33,35,41,89 In the two studies comparing cyclobenzaprine to diazepam, one showed no clinical difference between the treatment groups,35 whereas the other found cyclobenzaprine to be superior to diazepam, which in turn was noted to be better than placebo.33 The two studies that compared diazepam to tizanidine demonstrated no differences with regard to pain, activities of daily living, or patient self-assessment, but patients in the tizanidine groups had better range of motion in the lumbar spine.41,89
Animal and human studies have shown the short-acting benzodiazepine midazolam to possess antinociceptive properties in experiments involving induced facial pain.90,91 In a randomized, double-blind study comparing diazepam, ibuprofen, the combination of the two agents, and placebo in 39 patients with chronic myofascial orofacial pain, statistical analysis revealed only diazepam to be an effective analgesic.92 The efficacy of diazepam in the treatment of TMD has been demonstrated in other clinical trials as well.93,94
In a double-blind, placebo-controlled study undertaken in 20 patients with chronic TMD and myofascial pain unresponsive to conservative treatment, Harkins et al.95 compared low doses of the long-acting benzodiazepine clonazepam with an inactive placebo. Five patients (50%) in the clonazepam group dropped out after 30 days because their symptoms had improved significantly and they did not want to continue on medications. In contrast, seven patients (70%) dropped out of the placebo group after 30 days because they experienced no improvement. The high percentage of dropouts in each group precluded a 60-day assessment, but the authors concluded that low-dose clonazepam may be effective in the relief of TMD and head/neck myalgia. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial evaluating triazolam in patients with TMD, DeNucci et al.96 demonstrated that although triazolam improved sleep, it did not reduce pain or nocturnal masticatory muscle activity compared with placebo.
There have been several studies assessing the effectiveness of benzodiazepines to prevent or reduce the incidence of succinylcholine-induced myalgia after general anesthesia. The results of these trials have been conflicting. Pretreatment with diazepam was shown to reduce the incidence of succinylcholine-induced muscle pain in four of these studies.97–100 However, in several later randomized, controlled studies, pretreatment with neither midazolam nor diazepam was found to affect the incidence of fasciculations and postoperative muscle pain.101–103
Table 6
Table 6
Image Tools
Benzodiazepines have also been studied in the treatment of muscle contraction headache. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study comparing alprazolam to placebo in 48 patients with chronic tension headache demonstrated that alprazolam reduced the intensity but not the frequency of headaches.104 In contrast to other benzodiazepines, alprazolam possesses some antidepressant activity. In a single-blind crossover study, Weber105 treated 19 patients with muscle contraction headache with 10–15 mg of either diazepam or placebo. Eighteen of the 19 patients reported no change with placebo. In the treatment limb, 12 of 19 reported “great” improvement, with another 4 reporting “mild” improvement in symptoms. Several months later, 13 of the 18 patients who continued to take diazepam reported persistent pain relief and anxiolysis. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study by Hackett et al.106 assessing diazepam and flupentixol in 70 patients with muscle contraction headache found both treatments to be better than placebo. Lastly, Paiva et al.107 compared electromyographic biofeedback with diazepam in 36 patients with chronic muscle tension headaches in a double-blind study using both placebo pills and sham electromyographic biofeedback. The authors concluded that both treatments were superior to placebo, although only in the diazepam group was the difference statistically significant (P < 0.05; diazepam > biofeedback ≥ placebo). However in the 4-week follow-up period, the biofeedback patients continued to experience a reduction in the frequency and intensity of headaches, whereas the decrease observed in the diazepam group disappeared. In summary, there is conflicting evidence to support the use of benzodiazepines in TMD and tension-type headaches. The evidence for their effectiveness in muscle spasm is moderate, but their adverse effect profile and clear-cut inferiority when compared to traditional muscle relaxants precludes their routine use to treat this condition (table 6).
Back to Top | Article Outline
N-methyl-d-aspartate Antagonists
N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor antagonists have been shown to possess analgesic properties in numerous studies involving both neuropathic and acute pain syndromes. There are several mechanisms by which NMDA glutamate antagonists are purported to exert their antinociceptive effects. These include the prevention and possibly even reversal of central sensitization and “windup,” reducing tolerance to opioids, synergistic analgesic effects with opioids, and preemptive analgesia when administered in a timely fashion.108–110 The excitatory neurotransmitter glutamate elicits spontaneous pain and a reduction in pressure-pain thresholds, consistent with allodynia, when injected into human masseter muscle.111 This glutamate-evoked pain response was previously found to be greater in women than in men, which may explain the higher prevalence of some muscle pain conditions in female patients.112 NMDA glutamate receptor antagonists available for clinical use in the United States include ketamine, dextromethorphan, methadone, d-propoxyphene, amantadine, and memantine. There are no clinical studies evaluating the effects of NMDA blockers in myofascial pain conditions.
Back to Top | Article Outline
Nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory Drugs
Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs are the most commonly used medications in the treatment of myofascial pain. Their primary mechanism of action seems to be inhibition of the rate-limiting enzyme complex cyclooxygenase (COX), which in turn results in the reduced synthesis of prostaglandins in the periphery. Prostaglandins are substances involved in a wide range of physiologic activities, one of which is the sensitization of nociceptors. Evidence has accumulated showing that NSAIDs also act to inhibit prostaglandin production in the central nervous system, where they can modulate neurotransmitter release. In the late 1990s, several COX-2–specific inhibitors were introduced that only minimally interfere with the protective effects of prostaglandins on stomach mucosa and platelet function. These drugs have not been tested in disorders involving muscle pain. Recently, a COX-3 isoenzyme has been identified that is thought to be the target of antipyretic/analgesic drugs such as phenacetin and acetaminophen.113–115
Although NSAIDs are devoid of any direct effect on skeletal muscle contraction, they are frequently used as a first-line treatment for conditions involving muscle pain. Not all clinical research supports their efficacy in these disorders. For exercise-induced muscle soreness, the efficacy of NSAIDs is supported by some studies116 but refuted by others.117,118
Because the predominant site of action of NSAIDs lies in the periphery, it is no surprise that topical administration of this class of drugs has been shown in several randomized, double-blind studies to be an effective treatment for soft tissue injuries.119–123 NSAIDs have also been shown to relieve muscle pain when delivered via phonophoresis124 and, in one study, to be more effective than lidocaine when injected into TPs.125 An interesting double-blind, placebo-controlled study comparing the effects of topical diclofenac with placebo on thigh soft tissue pain induced by electrical stimulation in male volunteers was conducted by Affaitati et al.126 The results demonstrated that whereas no significant changes were noted in skin or subcutaneous thresholds in either group, muscle pain thresholds were significantly increased with diclofenac compared with placebo. This suggests that NSAIDs may have specific antinociceptive effects on algogenic conditions involving muscle.
For tension-type headaches, NSAIDs have become a consensus first-line treatment. In numerous randomized, controlled trials, this class of medications has been shown to reduce headache intensity88,127,128 and even frequency when given in regular dosing schedules.128 When taken in around-the-clock dosing schedules, rapid withdrawal of NSAIDs can lead to rebound headaches. NSAIDs with significant antiinflammatory effects have been shown to provide more effective pain relief than paraaminophenol analgesics largely devoid of these properties, such as acetaminophen or phenacetin.129–132
For TMD, NSAIDs have not been well demonstrated to be effective analgesics. In a double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating piroxicam in 26 patients with TMD, van den Berghe et al.133 found no difference between the experimental and control groups on spontaneous pain, palpation-induced tenderness, joint noise, or range of motion. A similar negative outcome for ibuprofen was obtained in a placebo-controlled trial by Singer and Dionne.92
Ekberg134 compared diclofenac to placebo in a series of studies conducted in patients with TMD. There was a trend toward greater improvement in the diclofenac group compared with placebo (50% vs. 32% of the 32 patients), but this effect did not reach statistical significance. Finally, in patients with TMJ osteoarthritis, Thie et al.135 compared a midrange dose of ibuprofen (1,200 mg/day) with glucosamine sulfate (1,500 mg/day) for 90 days in a randomized, double-blind study. Within-group analysis revealed significant improvement from baseline in both treatments, with no significant differences between groups. However, from day 90 to day 120 (30 days after the cessation of treatment), between-group comparison revealed the patients in the glucosamine group to have significantly less TMJ pain than the patients who had taken ibuprofen. This result is not surprising, considering the contrasting effects the two treatments have on proteoglycan synthesis and the continued therapeutic benefit of glucosamine for weeks after discontinuation.136–139 Previous reviews have also found little scientific support for the use of NSAIDs in patients with chronic temporomandibular pain.140,141
There are few studies assessing the effects of NSAIDs in the treatment of muscle spasm. In a single-blind crossover study comparing the muscle relaxant chlormezanone, chlormezanone plus aspirin, and placebo in patients with painful muscle spasm, the combination group was found to produce better relief than the group receiving chlormezanone alone, which in turn fared better than the placebo group.142 There are several double-blind studies showing the efficacy of NSAIDs in acute LBP, including one demonstrating similar efficacy but fewer adverse effects than opioids and another involving a COX-2 selective inhibitor, but in none of these studies was the precise cause of pain noted.143–145
Table 7
Table 7
Image Tools
Table 7
Table 7
Image Tools
Table 7
Table 7
Image Tools
There have been several attempts to assess the ability of NSAIDs to prevent or reduce succinylcholine-induced myalgia. Naguib et al.146 compared lysine acetyl salicylate to the muscle relaxant atracurium 3 min before paralysis. Both groups were found to have a lower incidence and intensity of postoperative myalgia than the control group, with no significant differences between treatment arms. In two follow-up studies, the effect of NSAIDs administered before the induction of anesthesia on the incidence of succinylcholine-induced myalgia were mixed.147,148 Overall, there is strong evidence to support the use of NSAIDs in tension headache, with drugs containing antiinflammatory properties being more effective than acetaminophen. There is no evidence to support their use in TMD. The evidence supporting the use of NSAIDs for other myofascial pain conditions is limited (muscle spasm and succinylcholine-induced myalgia) to moderate (acute soft tissue injury) (table 7).
Back to Top | Article Outline
Botulinum Toxins
Clostridum botulinum is a gram-positive anaerobic bacteria that produces seven different toxins, of which serotype A (BTX-A) is best known. Botulinum toxins (BTXs) exert their toxic and therapeutic effects by binding to the presynaptic membrane of the motor end plate, thereby blocking the release of acetylcholine without affecting nerve conduction or the synthesis and storage of neurotransmitter. The first use of BTX-A was in the treatment of strabismus.149 In the late 1980s, controlled trials began to appear showing that BTX-A was effective in reducing pain associated with conditions characterized by muscle hyperactivity, such as spasmodic torticollis.150 Animal studies have recently suggested that BTXs may exert antinociceptive effects independent of its effect on muscle, possibly by inhibiting inflammatory pain, blocking the release of glutamate, and reducing concentrations of substance P.151–154 Evidence for the independent antinociceptive effects of BTX include the observation that injections often reduce pain before the decrease in muscle contraction and their beneficial effects in painful conditions not mediated through muscles.154,155
There are dozens of studies assessing BTX in muscle pain. Some of the earliest ones involved cervical dystonia, a disorder characterized by involuntary, patterned contractions of cervical or shoulder muscles or both, resulting in abnormal head postures sometimes associated with repetitive, rhythmic, jerky movements. Musculoskeletal pain frequently accompanies these irregular movements and postures. A double-blind study by Brans et al.156 comparing BTX-A injections performed at 0 and 8 weeks and trihexyphenidyl in 66 patients with cervical dystonia demonstrated that the patients who received BTX reported significantly less disability and reduced impairment, as evaluated by the amplitude and duration of abnormal postures and movements, at their 12-week follow-up visits. However, the difference in pain scores between groups did not reach statistical significance. In this study, clinical measurements significantly correlated with electromyographic activity. In controlled studies assessing BTX-B, an alternative serotype used in BTX-A–resistant individuals, patients with cervical dystonia who received BTX injections reported significant improvements in severity, disability, and pain compared with placebo groups.157,158 The duration of symptom relief with BTX is dose dependent.
The injection of BTX has been demonstrated to be an effective treatment for axial LBP in which muscle is purported to play a role. Foster et al.159 injected either 40 units BTX-A or normal saline at five lumbar paravertebral levels on the side of maximum discomfort in a double-blind study involving 31 patients with chronic LBP of greater than 6 months’ duration. At their 8-week follow-up visit, 73% of the patients who received BTX versus 12.5% of the placebo group reported pain relief of 50% or greater. BTX has also been shown in randomized, controlled trials to be a more effective treatment for piriformis syndrome than injections performed with placebo160,161 and local anesthetic with steroid.161
The evidence for BTX use in regional pain syndromes is less clear-cut. In a placebo-controlled, double-blind crossover study comparing 50 units BTX-A, 100 units BTX-A, and normal saline in 33 patients with unilateral cervicothoracic paravertebral muscle pain, all groups showed clinical and algometric improvement at their follow-up visits (range, 1 week to 4 months), with no significant differences between groups.162 A second injection of 100 units BTX was given in the same (n = 11) or a different (n = 2) site in 13 of these patients. In this subgroup, only 1 of the 4 patients who initially received a placebo injection showed clinical improvement, versus 7 of 9 patients who had received a BTX injection as their first treatment. In a randomized trial comparing BTX-A injections against methylprednisolone in 40 patients with chronic myofascial pain involving the iliopsoas, anterior scalene, or piriformis muscles, both groups demonstrated clinical improvement 30 days after injection.163 The mean VAS score (0–10) decreased 3.9 points in the BTX group versus 3.5 in the steroid groups (P = 0.06). At 60 days after injection, the BTX group continued to show improvement (VAS score, −5.5), whereas the initial reduction in symptoms declined in the steroid group (−2.5).
Outcome trials for BTX injections in muscle contraction headaches have been mixed at best. Several controlled164,165 and uncontrolled studies166 have shown a beneficial effect for BTX-A treatment in tension headaches, but four placebo-controlled trials did not demonstrate a positive outcome.167–170 In two of these studies, the negative effect occurred despite electromyographic confirmation of diminished muscle tone.168,169 These negative results support the hypothesis that central mechanisms play a key role in chronic tension-type headaches.
It is estimated that almost 90% of whiplash patients experience some degree of muscle spasm, a statistic supported by electromyography findings.171,172 In two randomized, controlled trials evaluating BTX injections in patients with cervicogenic headaches and neck pain secondary to whiplash injury, the treatment groups fared better than the placebo groups at their latest follow-up 4 weeks after injection.173,174 Beneficial effects were also observed in 75% (open-label, n = 44)175 and 91% (placebo-controlled, n = 60)176 of treatment patients in two studies conducted to assess the efficacy of BTX in chronic facial pain.
Table 8
Table 8
Image Tools
Table 8
Table 8
Image Tools
Table 8
Table 8
Image Tools
There is a paucity of information on BTX treatment for TMD. Bilateral injection of the masseter and temporalis muscles produced significant improvements in pain, function, mouth opening and tenderness at 8-week follow-up assessments in an open-label trial involving 46 patients.177 In another uncontrolled trial, 80% of 41 TMD patients reported significant improvement in pain and function after BTX injections into the muscles of mastication (mean reduction in pain, 45%; average follow-up, 6.7 months).178 Only 17% of patients in this study required a second injection for recurrent symptoms. In summary, there is strong evidence to support the use of BTX injections in painful conditions associated with spasticity. The evidence is mixed or limited for conditions associated with increased muscle activity, such as tension headaches and LBP (table 8). The conflicting data may reflect the heterogeneity of mechanisms for these conditions.
Back to Top | Article Outline
Miscellaneous Agents
Capsaicin.
Table 9
Table 9
Image Tools
Table 9
Table 9
Image Tools
Table 9
Table 9
Image Tools
Table 9
Table 9
Image Tools
It is well established that repeated application of capsaicin cream depletes sensory C fibers of substance P, which is thought to be the principal transmitter of nociceptive impulses in type C sensory neurons. In an open-label, prospective pilot study performed in 23 patients with chronic, nonneurogenic neck pain, 48% of whom were diagnosed with myofascial pain, topically applied capsaicin cream was found to significantly reduce pain over the 5-week treatment period (mean reduction in VAS score, 23%).179 The results of selected clinical trials evaluating miscellaneous analgesics in painful muscle conditions are summarized in table 9.
Back to Top | Article Outline
Quinine.
Quinine sulfate has been prescribed for more than 60 yr in the treatment of nocturnal leg cramps180,181 and until recently was the only drug shown to be effective for this problem.182–187 The majority of studies show that quinine and its derivatives decrease the incidence, severity, and duration of night cramps, but not all report favorable results.188–190 The effect of quinine is mediated by decreasing the excitability of the motor end plate to nerve stimulation and increasing the muscle refractory period.
Back to Top | Article Outline
Magnesium.
Magnesium inhibits the release of acetylcholine from motor end plates and causes muscle relaxation in pharmacologic doses. Conversely, magnesium depletion facilitates neuromuscular excitability, producing tremor, cramps, and tetany. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial demonstrated that oral magnesium significantly reduced leg cramps in pregnant women, without increasing serum concentrations.191 These results are supported by Roffe et al.,192 but in contrast, Frusso et al.193 failed to find a difference between magnesium and placebo in a randomized, double-blind crossover study involving 45 subjects with nocturnal leg cramps. Regardless of the clinical evidence, magnesium salts are commonly used to relieve nocturnal leg pain in Europe and Latin America.
Back to Top | Article Outline
Naftidrofuryl.
Although its mechanism of action is incompletely understood, naftidrofuryl is a 5-HT2 serotonergic receptor antagonist that seems to act by improving cellular oxidative metabolism. This drug has traditionally been used to relieve pain associated with peripheral vascular disease. Various authors also have advocated its use in the treatment of nocturnal, lower extremity leg cramps.194,195 In a double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating naftidrofuryl in 17 patients with rest cramp, Young and Connolly196 found that administration of the drug significantly reduced the frequency of cramping and concluded that it was an effective alternative to quinine.
Back to Top | Article Outline
Vitamins.
Medina Santillan et al.197 performed a randomized, open-label comparative study examining the efficacy of dexamethasone alone versus dexamethasone plus vitamin B complex in 33 patients with acute LBP involving paravertebral muscle spasm. The investigators showed that adding B complex vitamins provided superior pain relief and greater improvement in muscle spasm than dexamethasone alone. Possible mechanisms for this effect involve synergy in the analgesic properties of the medications198 and the modulating effect of vitamin B6 on steroid hormone-mediated gene expression.199
In two randomized, double-blind trials assessing the efficacy of vitamin E in hemodialysis muscle cramps, patients receiving the vitamin supplements reported significant reductions in the frequency and intensity of cramps.200,201 In one study, the combination of vitamin C and E supplements produced a 97% decrease in muscle cramps.201 Quinine sulfate but not vitamin E was found to be superior to placebo in a double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial comparing the two treatments in nocturnal leg cramps.202
Back to Top | Article Outline
Antihistamines.
Histamine produces discomfort through stimulation of H1 receptors on sensory nerve terminals. Histamine also increases capillary permeability and dilates arterioles, with the latter effect produced by endothelial H1 stimulation–induced release of nitric oxide, prostacyclin, or both. It is thought by some that these mechanisms contribute to pain and possibly stiffness in the fatigued muscles of patients with myofascial pain. In an attempt to clarify this issue, the activity of histidine decarboxylase, the enzyme that forms histamine, was examined in the masseter muscles of mice and was found to increase after electrical stimulation, peaking at 6–8 h after exercise.203 In the second part of this study, the effect of an antihistamine (chlorphenylamine) was compared to an NSAID (flurbiprofen) for TMD in humans, which is known to produce myofascial pain involving facial, neck, and shoulders muscles. Chlorphenylamine was shown to reduce spontaneous pain and pain induced by chewing in 50% of subjects and to have a significantly greater effect than flurbiprofen (50% vs. 13%) in relieving the associated symptoms of headache and shoulder stiffness.203 In a double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial comparing the proprietary analgesic/antihistamine Mersyndol (Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Slough, England) in patients with TMD, the drug was found to be markedly superior to placebo.204 The relative contribution of the three active ingredients in Mersyndol, paracetamol, codeine, and doxylamine succinate, was not evaluated in this study.
Back to Top | Article Outline
Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors/Caffeine.
Caffeine possesses little or no analgesic activity when administered alone. Nevertheless, caffeine remains a widely used analgesic adjuvant in humans, having been shown to modestly, but significantly, potentiate the antinociceptive effects of a variety of different analgesic drug classes, including opiates and NSAIDs.205 This capacity to facilitate analgesia may relate to the ability of methylxanthines to increase circulating catecholamines, augment the twitch response of muscles via the translocation of intracellular calcium, constrict cerebrovascular beds, and enhance mood. In six randomized, double-blind, two-period crossover studies of 2,811 subjects undergoing similar protocols, caffeine-containing nonopioid analgesics were found to be significantly superior to placebo and nonopioid analgesics devoid of caffeine (i.e., acetaminophen) in the treatment of tension-type headache.206 The ability of caffeine to potentiate nonopioid analgesics in tension headache have been demonstrated in other studies as well.207–211 Gorlich et al.212 found that theophylline markedly enhanced the effect of quinine sulfate in a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study comparing the combination of quinine and theophylline to quinine alone and placebo in 164 patients with nocturnal leg cramps.
Back to Top | Article Outline
Metamizol.
Metamizol (dipyrone) is a nonopioid analgesic with antipyretic and spasmolytic properties. Recent evidence suggests metamizol may exert some of its antinociceptive effects via inhibition of COX-3.113,115 A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial by Martinez-Martin et al.213 comparing 0.5 and 1 g metamizol to 1 g acetylsalicylic acid in episodic tension-type headache demonstrated that both doses of metamizol were superior to acetylsalicylic acid. Whereas pain relief continued to improve for 4 h in all three treatment groups, the contrast between acetylsalicylic acid and metamizol gradually declined after 1 h. In a single-blind, placebo-controlled study assessing the efficacy of 1 g intravenous metamizol in patients with migraine and tension headaches, metamizol was shown to reduce pain intensity in both groups.214 In a follow-up study by the same authors, Bigal et al.215 compared 1 g intravenous metamizol with placebo in 60 patients with episodic tension-type headaches under double-blind conditions. A marked decrease in pain intensity was observed 30 min and 1 h after drug administration in the metamizol group. This decrease in pain persisted throughout the 24-h follow-up period, along with significant reductions in headache recurrence and the need for remedication. In an interesting study evaluating the prophylactic benefit of metamizol and naproxen plus paracetamol in experimental tension headache induced by intellectual challenge, Lujan et al.216 found both treatment groups to be more effective than placebo, with the naproxen–paracetamol group reporting less pain than the metamizol group. These clinical trials demonstrate the beneficial effects of metamizol in tension headaches and encourage further studies assessing its efficacy in other soft tissue disorders.
Back to Top | Article Outline
l-Carnitine.
There are conflicting reports as to whether carnitine deficiency occurs in dialysis patients and, if so, whether supplementation can improve cardiac function and intradialytic morbidity. Two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies have demonstrated that oral supplementation with carnitine can reduce muscle cramps and asthenia in hemodialysis patients.217,218
Back to Top | Article Outline
Corticosteroids.
Corticosteroids exert their analgesic effects through inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis and suppression of ectopic discharges in injured nerves. They also possess potent antiinflammatory properties, mediated through their inhibition of prostaglandin production and proinflammatory cytokine and adhesion molecule expression.219 Steroids have been shown to relieve pain in a wide array of disorders and are a mainstay of treatment for various forms of arthritis. Therefore, it seems logical that these drugs would be used in TMD. Interestingly, there are no published clinical trials assessing oral corticosteroids in this condition. However, several studies have reported that the intraarticular injection of steroids with and without local anesthetics220–222 and steroids administered via iontophoresis223 are beneficial. In contrast, Reid et al.224 found that iontophoretically administered dexamethasone was no better than placebo in reducing pain or improving range of motion in patients with TMD. There was a trend toward improved pain relief with steroid in the subgroup of patients with TMJ osteoarthritis in this study. Some clinicians have reported adverse effects on the TMJ as a result of chronic corticosteroid use.225,226
In a cross-sectional analysis of 71 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, 32% had frequent headaches, with the most common type being episodic tension headache.227 Among these 23 patients, only 1 was noted to have a headache refractory to conventional analgesics that responded to an increase in corticosteroid dose. There are no other clinical trials evaluating steroids in tension-type headaches, despite the fact that NSAIDs are the most frequently used medications worldwide for this condition. In patients with inflammatory myopathies, the short-term use of corticosteroids is a first-line treatment,228 but prolonged steroid use can also cause myopathy.229,230
Back to Top | Article Outline

Conclusion

Myofascial pain comprises a heterogeneous group of disorders. Therefore, it is not surprising to find conflicting outcomes as to the pharmacologic efficacy of different drugs. Even within a particular disorder such as tension headache or TMD, different drug mechanisms may play different roles in different patients. What is most surprising is how little basic science research has been completed to understand the mechanisms underlying soft tissue pathology. It is also striking that there is little evidence to support the use of many medications that are routinely prescribed for muscle pain. There are several different classes of medications that have been shown to be efficacious in the treatment of soft tissue pain, but no one class of drugs is beneficial across the entire spectrum of these conditions. It is imperative that further research be performed, both preclinically to help elucidate the mechanisms behind myofascial pain and clinically to justify specific treatments.231–280
Back to Top | Article Outline
Appendix: Evidence or Lack Thereof for Muscle Involvement in Painful Conditions
Fibromyalgia
Fibromyalgia syndrome is a constellation of symptoms characterized by widespread pain, fatigue, sleep abnormalities, and distress. The most widely used guidelines for making a diagnosis of fibromyalgia are those adopted in 1990 by the American College of Rheumatology. Their criteria consist of one historic feature and one physical finding. The historic element is pervasive, axial pain complaints on the left and right sides of the body above and below the waist, which persist for 3 months or longer. The physical finding requires the patient to experience pain in 11 of 18 designated tender point sites on digital palpation with a force of 4 kg. Despite numerous studies that have attempted to identify a causative agent, none has yet to be identified (hence the term syndrome instead of disease). Some muscle biopsy studies have found patients with fibromyalgia symptoms to have reduced muscle fiber size, diminished capillary density, and decreased levels of high-energy phosphates,281–283 but these findings have been inconsistent.284 Recent investigations have therefore focused on central mechanisms of pain. In studies by Staud et al.,285,286 the authors demonstrated exaggerated temporal summation of painful stimuli in fibromyalgia patients compared with control subjects, indicating central sensitization had occurred. Neuroendocrine and related abnormalities have also been found in fibromyalgia patients, including reduced serum concentrations of serotonin, increased cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of substance P, increased nitric oxide synthesis indicating NMDA receptor activation, alterations in autonomic nervous system function, increased concentrations of cytokines indicating possible neurogenic inflammation, mildly reduced baseline plasma concentrations of cortisol with a hyperreactive hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis, growth hormone deficiency, low concentrations of oxytocin, increased cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of nerve growth factor, and stage IV sleep disturbances.287–292 These findings have led researchers to conclude that fibromyalgia is predominantly a disorder of sensory processing rather than one caused by tissue abnormalities.284 As such, the treatment of this disorder is beyond the scope of this review article.
Back to Top | Article Outline
Tension-type Headache
Recent studies have borne out the fact that there is a large degree of overlap among the various types of headache, particularly migraine and tension headaches.293 This overlap includes both pathophysiology and clinical characteristics, which may explain the observation that drugs such as TCAs that are effective for one class of headache are often efficacious in other types. The mechanisms of head pain that may be shared to varying degrees between migraine and tension headaches include peripheral mechanisms, as manifested by myofascial tenderness and enhanced electromyographic and algometric pressure recordings, central sensitization secondary to enhanced nitric oxide production or NMDA receptor activation or both, and trigeminal vascular activation leading to neurogenic inflammation.294–296 The first two factors are most important in the etiology of tension headaches, whereas the last two mechanisms predominate in migraines. Approximately 70% of patients with tension headache exhibit muscle tightness and tenderness, indicative of peripheral pain mechanisms, with the percentage being higher in individuals suffering episodic headaches.297 The relative contribution of peripheral and central mechanisms to tension headache determines in part the responsiveness to various classes of analgesic medications. Stopping the evolution from primarily a peripheral to a central mechanism is of major importance in preventing episodic tension headaches from becoming chronic.
Back to Top | Article Outline
Low Back Pain
The demands on spinal structures are enormous. These functions include protecting the contents of the spinal canal, maintaining truncal stability, and providing a base for movements of the extremities. Bony structures and ligaments provide stability and protection, whereas muscles are the main component responsible for the coordination of spinal movement. In addition to providing a stable base, muscles must retain a certain amount of flexibility to permit movement in multiple planes. Back, abdominal, and other pelvic support muscles are constantly readjusting to maintain posture and redistribute loads to the lower extremities. These conflicting demands often result in stresses that lead to injury.298
It has long been known that LBP is associated with muscle pathology, particularly the postural muscles in the abdominal and paraspinous regions. This association has been confirmed by studies demonstrating increased paraspinal muscle activity in patients with chronic LBP compared with matched controls.299 Not surprisingly, lumbar stabilization programs focusing on rehabilitation of the lumbar spine musculature have been shown to reduce pain and improve function.300 Abnormalities in muscle that can cause or exacerbate preexisting LBP include increases in muscle tension, sprains, strains, tears, weakness, and spasm. These pathologic processes may be secondary to altered gait mechanics, impaired postural control, and diminished lumbar proprioception, often as a consequence of preexisting lumbosacral pathology.301 The extent to which muscle pathology is the primary cause or merely an effect of LBP is unknown.
In a study by Long et al.1 examining the causes of LBP in more than 2,000 patients, myofascial pain accounted for 20% of cases, making it the second most common cause, behind only herniated nucleus pulposus. The main problem with attributing muscle pathology as the primary cause of LBP is that in many instances, it is a diagnosis of exclusion. For this reason, unless myofascial pain was specifically designated as the primary cause of discomfort, LBP studies were not included in this review. Further evidence for the role muscles play in LBP can be seen by the beneficial effect treatments aimed at muscles such as muscle relaxants and BTX injections have in the condition.40,298
Back to Top | Article Outline
Temporomandibular Disorder
Temporomandibular disorder is a nonspecific term encompassing a wide range of pain and dysfunctional jaw conditions. These conditions include symptoms and pathology involving the muscles of mastication, the TMJ, the nervous system, and behavior. There is little consensus regarding the most favorable classification scheme for TMD. However, most recognize the need to classify TMD according to two distinct but interrelated components: (1) pathology originating in the TMJ or intracapsular region (arthrogenic) and (2) pathology originating in the masticatory musculature (myogenic). TMD affects patients across geographic, ethnic, and cultural boundaries. Arthrogenic TMD is more common in older patients, whereas the myogenic form is more prevalent in younger persons. Given the enhanced tactile sensibility of the oral cavity and the unremitting use of the TMJ, it is not surprising that TMD is such a common diagnosis. Across all age groups, women are affected more frequently than men.302
In epidemiologic studies involving both white and Asian patients, myogenic TMD has been found to be more common than the arthrogenic form.303,304 List and Dworkin303 found 76% of patients with TMD to have predominantly muscle pathology, which was far more common than their other two diagnostic classifications, disc displacement and arthralgia/arthritis/arthrosis. It is not surprising then that electromyographic studies have demonstrated increased tone in the masticatory muscles of patients with TMD305 and that electromyographic biofeedback treatment has been shown to significantly reduce pain in the disorder.306 Although poor oral habits and dysfunctional behaviors (bruxism, teeth clenching), malocclusion, previous surgical and orthodontic procedures, degenerative changes in the TMJ, inadequate coping skills, preexisting psychopathology, and the presence of associated pain disorders have all been reported to predispose patients to TMD, the risk factors for development of chronic TMD have not been definitively established.307 There is some evidence that small muscles, such as those involved in mastication, may be more prone to hyperalgesia than larger muscles.13
Back to Top | Article Outline
Muscle Cramps
Muscle cramps occur when a muscle already in its most shortened natural position further contracts.308 True cramps, which by definition occur in the absence of fluid or electrolyte imbalance, are more prevalent in patients with well-developed muscles, in the latter stages of pregnancy, and in patients with cirrhosis.309 They are typically asymmetric, explosive in onset, and most frequently affect the gastrocnemius muscle and small muscles of the foot. The contraction, which is often visible, may leave soreness and swelling. The most common type of true muscle cramp occurs at rest, usually during the night.
Studies indicate that true muscle cramps tend to be of neuromuscular origin. They most frequently start in the intramuscular portion of motor nerve terminals and are characterized by motor unit action potentials.310 When they commence, relief of common cramps can usually be effected by passively or actively stretching the cramped muscle. In addition to true muscle cramps, cramping is also seen in hyponatremia associated with salt depletion (e.g., hemodialysis or heat cramps), neurologic disorders, hyperthyroidism, and certain medications.309,311,312
Back to Top | Article Outline
Myofascial Pain Syndrome
The MPSs are comprised of a large group of disorders whose hallmark is the presence of hypersensitive areas within muscles and/or the investing connective tissue, called trigger points, accompanied by pain, spasm, stiffness, tenderness, restricted range of motion, and weakness. The clinical features of MPS are best described by Simons et al.313 in their classic work on TPs as consisting of (1) a palpable taut band of muscle, (2) localized tenderness within this taut band, (3) a characteristic pain referral pattern occurring when pressure is applied to this TP, and (4) a local twitch response to snapping palpation of the TP. Despite its acceptance, a major problem with this definition has been poor agreement between examiners in interrater reliability studies.314,315
Trigger points are usually subclassifed into two types, active and latent. Active TPs are associated with a specific pain that is reproduced when pressure is applied to the taut band of sensitive tissue. Latent TPs, the more common of the two, do not normally produce spontaneous pain, although they may be activated by weather changes, overuse of muscles, prolonged immobility, poor posture, and mechanical stressors. Not infrequently, myofascial pain is precipitated by a seemingly innocuous activity. Some studies suggest that latent TPs may be present in as many as half of asymptomatic young adults in the shoulder-girdle muscles and in 5–45% of lumbogluteal muscles.316,317 In most instances, the only manifestations of latent TPs are decreased range of motion and easy fatigability.
The pathophysiology of TP formation is incompletely understood. Several studies have found electromyographic evidence of spike discharges and increased spontaneous activity in TP, although these findings have also been found in regions not causing symptoms.318–322 Four main theories have been proposed to explain the formation of and findings seen in TP. These include muscle spindle hyperactivity, end plate hyperactivity, focal dystonia, and psychosomatic origin.318,321,323,324 Each of these theories is supported by some studies but refuted by others.323 It is plausible that several or even all of these hypotheses prevail in MPS. Cited Here...
Back to Top | Article Outline

References

1. Long DM, BenDebba M, Torgerson WS, Dawson EG, Hardy RW, Robertson JT, Sypert GW, Watts C: Persistent back pain and sciatica in the United States: Patient characteristics. J Spinal Disord 1996; 9:40–58

2. Skootsky SA, Jaeger B, Oye RK: Prevalence of myofascial pain in general internal medicine practice. West J Med 1989; 151:157–60

3. Gerwin RD: Classification, epidemiology, and natural history of myofascial pain syndrome. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2001; 5:412–20

4. Simons DG, Mense S: Understanding and measurement of muscle tone as related to clinical muscle pain. Pain 1998; 75:1–17

5. Borg-Stein J, Simons DG: Myofascial pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 83(suppl 1):S40–7

6. Maekawa K, Clark GT, Kuboki T: Intramuscular hypoperfusion, adrenergic receptors and chronic muscle pain. J Pain 2002; 3:251–60

7. Suvinen TI, Hanes KR, Gerschman JA, Reade PC: Psychophysical subtypes of temporomandibular disorders. J Orofac Pain 1997; 11:200–5

8. London LH, Shulman B, Diamond S: The role of psychometric testing and psychological treatment in tension-type headache. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2001; 5:467–71

9. Alvarez DJ, Rockwell PG: Trigger points: Diagnosis and management. Am Fam Physician 2002; 65:653–60

10. Bennett RM: Emerging concepts in the neurobiology of chronic pain: Evidence of abnormal sensory processing in fibromyalgia. Mayo Clin Proc 1999; 74:385–98

11. Simons DG: Muscular pain syndromes, Advances in Pain Research and Therapy. Vol 17. Edited by Friction JR, Awad E. New York, Raven Press, 1990, p 1

12. Wright A, Graven-Nielsen T, Davies I, Arendt-Nielsen L: Temporal summation of pain from skin, muscle and joint following nociceptive ultrasonic stimulation in humans. Exp Brain Res 2002; 144:475–82

13. Graven-Nielsen T, Arendt-Nielsen L: Peripheral and central sensitization in musculoskeletal pain disorders: An experimental approach. Curr Rheumatol Rep 2002; 4:313–21

14. Hoheisel U, Mense S, Simons DG, Yu X-M: Appearance of new receptive fields in rat dorsal horn neurons following noxious stimulation of skeletal muscle: A model for referral of muscle pain? Neurosci Lett 1993; 153:9–12

15. Lance JW, Curran DA: Treatment of chronic tension headache. Lancet 1964; 42:1236–9

16. Woodforde JM, Dwyer B, McEwen BW, DeWilde FW, Bleasel K, Connelley TJ, Ho CY: Treatment of postherpetic neuralgia. Med J Aust 1965; 1:869–72

17. Eschalier A, Mestre C, Dubrya C, Ardid D: Why are antidepressants effective as pain relief? CNS Drugs 1994; 2:261–7

18. Eschalier A, Ardid D, Dubray C: Tricyclic and other antidepressants as analgesics, Novel Aspects of Pain Management: Opioids and Beyond. Edited by Sawynok J, Cowan A. New York, Wiley, 1999, pp 303–20

19. Cohen SP, Abdi S: New developments in the use of tricyclic antidepressants for the management of pain. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2001; 14:505–11

20. Feinmann C, Harris M, Cawley R: Psychogenic facial pain: Presentation and treatment. BMJ 1984; 288:436–8

21. Sharav Y, Singer E, Schmidt E, Dionne RA, Dubner R: The analgesic effect of amitriptyline on chronic facial pain. Pain 1987; 31:199–209

22. Plesh O, Curtis D, Levine J, McCall WD Jr: Amitriptyline treatment of chronic pain in patients with temporomandibular disorders. J Oral Rehabil 2000; 27:834–41

23. Diamond S, Baltes BJ: Chronic tension headaches treated with amitriptyline: A double-blind study. Headache 1971; 11:110–6

24. Bendtsen L, Jensen R: Amitriptyline reduces myofascial tenderness in patients with chronic tension-type headache. Cephalagia 2000; 20:603–10

25. McQuay H, Carroll D, Jadad AR, Wiffen P, Moore A: Anticonvulsant drugs for management of pain: A systematic review. BMJ 1995; 311:1047–52

26. Spierings EL, Schroevers M, Honkoop PC, Sorbi M: Presentation of chronic daily headache: A clinical study. Headache 1998; 38:191–6

27. Manzoni GC, Granella F, Sandrini G, Cavallini A, Zanferrari C, Nappi G: Classification of chronic daily headache by International Headache Society criteria: Limits and new proposals. Cephalagia 1995; 15:37–43

28. Fragoso YD, Carrazana EJ: Low doses of gabapentin may be helpful in the management of chronic daily headache. MedGenMed 2000; 2:E52

29. Mathew NT, Ali S: Valproate in the treatment of persistent chronic daily headache: An open label study. Headache 1991; 31:71–4

30. Rosenberg JM, Harrell C, Ristic H, Werner RA, de Rosayro AM: The effect of gabapentin on neuropathic pain. Clin J Pain 1997; 13:251–5

31. Serrao M, Rossi P, Cardinali P, Valente G, Parisi L, Pierelli F: Gabapentin treatment for muscle cramps: An open-label trial. Clin Neuropharmacol 2000; 23:45–9

32. Hatta V, Saxena A, Kaul HL: Phenytoin reduces suxamethonium-induced myalgia. Anaesthesia 1992; 47:664–7

33. Brown BR, Womble J: Cyclobenzaprine in intractable pain syndromes with muscle spasm. JAMA 1978; 240:1151–2

34. Bercel NA: Cyclobenzaprine in the treatment of skeletal muscle spasm in osteoarthritis of the cervical and lumbar spine. Curr Ther Res 1977; 22:462–8

35. Basmajian JV: Cyclobenzaprine hydrochloride effect on skeletal muscle spasm in the lumbar region and neck: Two double-blind controlled clinical and laboratory studies. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1978; 59:58–63

36. Schwartz L, Kutscher AH, Yavelow I, Cobin HP, Brod MS: Carisoprodol in the management of temporomandibular joint pain and dysfunction: A preliminary report. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1960; 86:245–9

37. Greene CS, Laskin DM: Meprobamate therapy for the myofascial pain-dysfunction (MPD) syndrome: A double-blind evaluation. JADA 1971; 82:587–90

38. Herman CR, Schiffman EL, Look JO: The effectiveness of adding pharmacologic treatment with clonazepam or cyclobenzaprine to patient education and self-care for the treatment of jaw pain upon awakening: A randomized, clinical trial. J Orofac Pain 2002; 16:64–79

39. Singer EJ, Dionne RA: A controlled evaluation of ibuprofen and diazepam for chronic orofacial muscle pain. J Orofac Pain 1997; 11:139–46

40. Browning R, Jackson JL, O’Malley PG: Cyclobenzaprine and back pain: A meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med 2001; 161:1613–20

41. Fryda-Kaurimsky Z, Muller-Fassbender H: Tizanidine (DS 103-282) in the treatment of acute paravertebral muscle spasm: A controlled trial comparing tizanidine and diazepam. J Int Med Res 1981; 9:501–5

42. Lepisto P: A comparative trial of tizanidine and placebo in patients with skeletal-muscle spasms after operation for herniated disk. Curr Ther Res 1981; 30:141–6

43. Fogelholm R, Murros M: Tizanidine in chronic tension-type headache: A placebo controlled double-blind cross-over study. Headache 1992; 32:509–13

44. Shimomura T, Awaki E, Kowa H, Takahashi K: Treatment of tension-type headache with tizanidine hydrochloride: Its efficacy and relationship to the plasma MHPG concentration. Headache 1991; 31:601–4

45. Murros K, Kataja M, Hedman C, Havanka H, Sato E, Farkkila M, Peltola J, Keranen T: Modified-release formulation of tizanidine in chronic tension-type headache. Headache 2000; 40:633–7

46. Taricco M, Adone R, Pagliacci C, Telaro E: Pharmacological interventions for spasticity following spinal cord injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000; 2:CD00131

47. Penn RD, Savoy SM, Corcos D, Latash M, Gottlieb G, Parke B, Kroin JS: Intrathecal baclofen for severe spinal spasticity. N Engl J Med 1989; 320:1517–21

48. Hugenholts H, Nelson RF, Dehoux E, Bickerton R: Intrathecal baclofen for intractable spinal spasticity: A double blind crossover study in eight patients. Can J Neurol Sci 1992; 19:188–95

49. Nance PW, Bugaresti J, Shellenberger K, Sheremata W, Martinez-Arizala A: Efficacy and safety of tizanidine in the treatment of spasticity in patients with spinal cord injury. North American Tizanidine Study Group. Neurology 1994; 44(suppl 9):S44–51

50. Shakespeare DT, Boggild M, Young C: Anti-spasticity agents for multiple sclerosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001; 4:CD001332

51. Feldman RG, Kelly-Hayes M, Conomy JP, Foley JM: Baclofen for spasticity in multiple sclerosis: Double-blind crossover and three-year study. Neurology 1978; 28:1094–8

52. Smith C, Birnbaum G, Carter JI, Greenstein J, Lublin FD: Tizanidine treatment of spasticity caused by multiple sclerosis: Results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Neurology 1994; 44 (suppl 9):S34–42

53. United Kingdom Tizanidine Trial Group: A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of tizanidine in the treatment of spasticity caused by multiple sclerosis. Neurology 1994; 44(suppl 9):S70–8

54. Flacco L, Colozzi A, Ripari P, Pieralisi G: Dantrolene sodium in traumatic muscle contracture: Double-blind clinical and pharmacological trial. Clin Ther 1989; 11:623–32

55. Christian JM: Treatment of muscle spasms with oral dantrolene sodium. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1989; 67:268–70

56. Bertorini T, Palmieri G, Bhattacharya S: Beneficial effects of dantrolene sodium in exercise-induced muscle pains: Calcium mediated? Lancet 1982; 1:616–7

57. Collier CB: Dantrolene and suxamethonium: The effect of pre-operative dantrolene on the action of suxamethonium. Anaesthesia 1979; 34:152–8

58. Brennum J, Kjeldsen M, Olesen J: The 5-HT-like agonist sumatriptan has a significant effect in chronic tension-type headache. Cephalagia 1992; 12:375–9

59. Cady RK, Gutterman D, Saiers JA, Beach ME: Responsiveness of non-IHS migraine and tension-type headache to sumatriptan. Cephalagia 1997; 17:588–90

60. Olesen J: Clinical and pathophysiological observations in migraine and tension-type headache explained by integration of vascular, supraspinal and myofascial inputs. Pain 1991; 46:125–32

61. Bono G, Micieli G, Sances G, Calvani M, Nappi G: L-5HTP treatment in primary headaches: An attempt at clinical identification of responsive patients. Cephalagia 1984; 4:159–65

62. Dao TT, Lund JP, Remillard G, Lavigne GJ: Is myofascial pain of the temporal muscles relieved by oral sumatriptan? A cross-over pilot study. Pain 1995; 62:241–4

63. Harrison SD, Balawi SA, Feinmann C, Harris M: Atypical fascial pain: A double-blind placebo-controlled crossover pilot study of subcutaneous sumatriptan. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 1997; 7:83–8

64. Nappi G, Sandrini G, Granella F, Ruiz L, Cerutti G, Facchinetti F, Blandini F, Manzoni GC: A new 5-HT2 antagonist (ritanserin) in the treatment of chronic headache with depression: A double-blind study vs amitriptyline. Headache 1990; 30:439–44

65. Jain KK: An evaluation of intrathecal ziconotide for the treatment of chronic pain. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2000; 9:2403–10

66. Choe H, Kim JS, Ko SH, Kim DC, Han YJ, Song HS: Epidural verapamil reduces analgesic consumption after lower abdominal surgery. Anesth Analg 1998; 86:786–90

67. Staats PS, Yearwood T, Charapata SG, Presley RW, Wallace MS, Byas-Smith M, Fisher R, Bryce DA, Mangieri EA, Luther RR, Mayo M, McGuire D, Ellis D: Intrathecal ziconotide in the treatment of refractory pain in patients with cancer or AIDS: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2004; 291:63–70

68. Micieli G, Sances G, Pacchetti C, Trucco M, Magri M, Piazza D: Flunarizine: A wide spectrum prophylactic for migraine headache. Int J Clin Pharm Res 1984; 3:239–45

69. Micieli G, Piazza D, Sinforiani E, Cavallini A, Trucco M, Gabellini S, Mancuso A, Pacchetti C: Antimigraine drugs in the management of daily chronic headaches: Clinical profiles of responsive patients. Cephalagia 1985; 5 (suppl 20):219–24

70. Shukla R, Garg RK, Nag D, Ahuja RC: Nifedipine in migraine and tension headache: A randomized double blind crossover study. J Assoc Physicians India 1995; 43:770–2

71. Peer G, Blum M, Aviram A: Relief of hemodialysis-induced muscular cramps by nifedipine. Dialysis Transplant 1983; 12:180–1

72. Baltodano N, Gallo BV, Weidler DJ: Verapamil vs. quinine in recumbent nocturnal leg cramps in the elderly. Arch Intern Med 1988; 148:1969–70

73. Linde B, Hjemdahl P, Freyschuss U, Juhlin-Dannfelt A: Adipose tissue and skeletal muscle blood flow during mental stress. Am J Physiol 1989; 256:E12–8

74. Maekawa K, Kuboki T, Miyawaki T, Shimada M, Yamashita A, Clark GT: Effect of intravenous infusion of an alpha-adrenergic blocking agent on the haemodynamic changes in human masseter muscle induced by cold pressor stimulation. Arch Oral Biol 1999; 44:319–27

75. Acero CO Jr, Kuboki T, Maekawa K, Yamashita A, Clark GT: Haemodynamic responses in chronically painful, human trapezius muscle to cold pressor stimulation. Arch Oral Biol 1999; 44:805–12

76. Larsson SE, Alund M, Cai H, Oberg PA: Chronic pain after soft-tissue injury of the cervical spine: Trapezius muscle blood flow and electromyography at static loads and fatigue. Pain 1994; 57:173–80

77. Denaro A, Martucci N, Ruggieri S, Manna V, Agnoli A: Headache and noradrenergic involvement: The effects of alpha 2-stimulants and alpha 2-antagonists. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl 1985; 320:20–5

78. Kaplan B, Wang T, Rammohan M, del Greco F, Molteni A, Atkinson AJ Jr: Response to head-up tilt in cramping and noncramping hemodialysis patients. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol 1992; 30:173–80

79. Sidhom OA, Odeh YK, Krumlovsky FA, Budris WA, Wang Z, Pospisil PA, Atkinson AJ Jr: Low-dose prazosin in patients with muscle cramps during hemodialysis. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1994; 56:445–51

80. Stein C, Schafer M, Machelska H: Attacking pain at its source: New perspectives on opioids. Nat Med 2003; 9:1003–8

81. Fishman SM, Wilsey B, Mahajan G, Molina P: Methadone reincarnated: Novel clinical applications with related concerns. Pain Med 2002; 3:339–48

82. Raffa RB, Friderichs E, Reimann W, Shank RP, Codd EE, Vaught JL, Jacoby HI, Selve N: Complementary and synergistic antinociceptive interaction between the enantiomers of tramadol. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1993; 267:331–40

83. Schnitzer RJ, Gray WL, Paster RZ, Kamin M: Efficacy of tramadol in treatment of chronic low back pain. J Rheumatol 2000; 27:772–8

84. Biasi G, Manca S, Manganelli S, Marcolongo R: Tramadol in the fibromyalgia syndrome: A controlled clinical trial versus placebo. Int J Clin Pharmacol Res 1998; 18:13–9

85. Moulin DE, Iezzi A, Amireh R, Sharpe WK, Boyd D, Merskey H: Randomised trial of oral morphine for chronic non-cancer pain. Lancet 1996; 347:143–7

86. List T, Tegelberg A, Haraldson T, Isacsson G: Intra-articular morphine as analgesic in temporomandibular joint arthralgia/osteoarthritis. Pain 2001; 94:275–82

87. Friedman AP: Assessment of Fiorinal with codeine in the treatment of tension headache. Clin Ther 1986; 8:703–21

88. Harden RN, Rogers D, Fink K, Gracely RH: Controlled trial of ketorolac in headache. Neurology 1998; 50:507–9

89. Hennies OL: A new skeletal muscle relaxant (DS 103–282*) compared to diazepam in the treatment of muscle spasm of local origin. J Int Med Res 1981; 9:62–8

90. Aigouy L, Fondras JC, Pajot J, Schoeffler P, Woda A: Intrathecal midazolam versus intrathecal morphine in orofacial nociception: An experimental study in rats. Neurosci Lett 1992; 139:97–9

91. Nakanishi O, Amano Y, Ishikawa T, Azuma M, Imamura Y: Effects of midazolam on pain sensations in the face. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997; 84:11–5

92. Singer E, Dionne R: A controlled evaluation of ibuprofen and diazepam for chronic orofacial muscle pain. J Orofac Pain 1997; 11:139–46

93. Jagger RG: Diazepam in the treatment of temporomandibular joint dysfunction syndrome: A double blind study. J Dent 1973; 2:37–40

94. Stiesch-Scholz M, Fink M, Tschernitschek H, Rossbach A: Medical and physical therapy of temporomandibular joint disk displacement without reduction. Cranio 2002; 20:85–90

95. Harkins S, Linford J, Cohen J, Kramer T, Cueva L: Administration of clonazepam in the treatment of TMD and associated myofascial pain: A double-blind pilot study. J Craniomandib Disord Facial Oral Pain 1991; 5:179–86

96. DeNucci DJ, Sobiski C, Dionne RA: Triazolam improves sleep but fails to alter pain in TMD patients. J Orofac Pain 1998; 12:116–23

97. Eisenberg M, Balsley S, Katz RL: Effects of diazepam on succinylcholine-induced myalgia, potassium increase, creatine phosphokinase elevation, and relaxation. Anesth Analg 1979; 58:314–7

98. Verma RS: Diazepam and suxamethonium muscle pain (a dose-response study). Anaesthesia 1982; 37:688–90

99. Verma RS, Chatterji S, Mathur N: Diazepam and succinylcholine-induced muscle pains. Anesth Analg 1978; 57:295–7

100. Davies AO: Oral diazepam premedication reduces the incidence of post-succinylcholine muscle pains. Can Anaesth Soc J 1983; 30:603–6

101. Chestnutt WN, Lowry KG, Dundee JW, Pandit SK, Mirakhur RK: Failure of two benzodiazepines to prevent suxamethonium-induced muscle pain. Anaesthesia 1985; 40:263–9

102. Manchikanti L: Diazepam does not prevent succinylcholine-induced fasciculations and myalgia: A comparative evaluation of the effect of diazepam and d-tubocurarine pretreatments. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1984; 28:523–8

103. Fisher QA, Fisher E, Matjasko MJ: Midazolam pretreatment does not ameliorate myoglobinemia or the clinical side effects of succinylcholine. J Clin Anesth 1993; 5:414–8

104. Shukla R, Nag D, Ahuja RC: Alprazolam in chronic tension type headache. J Assoc Physicians India 1996; 44:641–4

105. Weber MG: The treatment of muscle contraction headaches with diazepam. Curr Ther Res 1973; 14:210–6

106. Hackett GI, Boddie HG, Harrison P: Chronic muscle contraction headache: The importance of depression and anxiety. J R Soc Med 1987; 80:689–91

107. Paiva T, Nunes S, Moreira A, Santos J, Teixeira J, Barbosa A: Effects of frontalis EMG biofeedback and diazepam in the treatment of tension headache. Headache 1982; 22:216–20

108. Price DD, Mao J, Mayer DJ: Central neural mechanisms of normal and abnormal pain states, Progress in Pain Research and Management. Vol 1. Edited by Fields HL, Liebeskind JC. Seattle, IASP Press, 1994, pp 61–83

109. Hewitt DJ: The use of NMDA-receptor antagonists in the treatment of chronic pain. Clin J Pain 2000; 16:S73–9

110. Moiniche S, Kehlet H, Dahl JB: A qualitative and quantitative systematic review of preemptive analgesia for postoperative pain relief. Anesthesiology 2002; 96:725–41

111. Svensson P, Cairns BE, Wang K, Hu JW, Graven-Nielsen T, Arendt-Nielsen L, Sessle BJ: Glutamate-evoked pain and mechanical allodynia in the human masseter muscle. Pain 2003; 101:221–7

112. Cairns BE, Hu JW, Arendt-Nielsen L, Sessle BJ, Svensson P: Sex-related differences in human pain and rat afferent discharge evoked by injection of glutamate into the masseter muscle. J Neurophysiol 2001; 86:782–91

113. Chandrasekharan NV, Dai H, Roos KL, Evanson NK, Tomsik J, Elton TS, Simmons DL: COX-3, a cyclooxygenase-1 variant inhibited by acetaminophen and other analgesic/antipyretic drugs: Cloning, structure, and expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002; 99:13926–31

114. Schwab JM, Schluesener HJ, Meyermann R, Serhan CN: COX-3: Just another COX or the solitary elusive target of paracetamol? Lancet 2003; 361:981–2

115. Simmons DL: Variants of cyclooxygenase-1 and their roles in medicine. Thromb Res 2003; 110:265–8

116. Semark A, Noakes TD, St. Clair Gibson A, Lambert MI: The effect of a prophylactic dose of flurbiprofen on muscle soreness and sprinting performance in trained subjects. J Sports Sci 1999; 17:197–203

117. Lecomte JM, Lacroix VJ, Montgomery DL: A randomized controlled trial of the effect of naproxen on delayed onset muscle soreness and muscle strength. Clin J Sport Med 1998; 8:82–7

118. Dudley GA, Czerkawski J, Meinrod A, Gillis G, Baldwin A, Scarpone M: Efficacy of naproxen sodium for exercise-induced dysfunction muscle injury and soreness. Clin J Sport Med 1997; 7:3–10

119. Baixauli F, Ingles F, Alcantara P, Navarrete R, Puchol E, Vidal F: Percutaneous treatment of acute soft tissue lesions with naproxen gel and ketoprofen gel. J Int Med Res 1990; 18:372–8

120. Machen J, Whitefield M: Efficacy of a proprietary ibuprofen gel in soft tissue injuries: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Int J Clin Pract 2002; 56:102–6

121. Patel RK, Leswell PF: Comparison of ketoprofen, piroxicam, and diclofenac gels in the treatment of acute soft-tissue injury in general practice. General Practice Study Group. Clin Ther 1996; 18:497–507

122. Svennson P, Houe L, Arendt-Nielsen L: Effect of systemic versus topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on postexercise jaw-muscle soreness: A placebo-controlled study. J Orofac Pain 1997; 11:353–62

123. Steen KH, Wegner H, Meller ST: Analgesic profile of peroral and topical ketoprofen upon low pH-induced muscle pain. Pain 2001; 93:23–33

124. Shin SM, Choi JK: Effect of indomethacin phonophoresis on the relief of temporomandibular joint pain. Cranio 1997; 15:345–8

125. Frost A: Diclofenac versus lidocaine as injection therapy in myofascial pain. Scand J Rheumatol 1986; 15:153–6

126. Affaitati G, Vecchiet F, Lerza R, De Laurentis S, Iezzi S, Festa F, Giamberardino MA: Effects of topical diclofenac (DHEP plaster) on skin, subcutis and muscle pain thresholds in subjects without spontaneous pain. Drugs Exp Clin Res 2001; 27:69–76

127. Lange R, Lentz R: Comparison of ketoprofen, ibuprofen and naproxen sodium in the treatment of tension-type headache. Drugs Exp Clin Res 1995; 21:89–96

128. Mongini F, Bona G, Garnero M, Gioria A: Efficacy of meclofenamate sodium versus placebo in headache and craniofacial pain. Headache 1993; 33:22–8

129. Steiner TJ, Lange R: Ketoprofen (25 mg) in the symptomatic treatment of episodic tension-type headache: Double-blind placebo-controlled comparison with acetaminophen (1000 mg). Cephalagia 1998; 18:38–43

130. Packman B, Packman E, Doyle G, Cooper S, Ashraf E, Koronkiewicz K, Jayawardena S: Solubilized ibuprofen: Evaluation of onset, relief, and safety of a novel formulation in the treatment of episodic tension-type headache. Headache 2000; 40:561–7

131. Schachtel BP, Furey SA, Thoden WR: Nonprescription ibuprofen and acetaminophen in the treatment of tension-type headache. J Clin Pharmacol 1996; 36:1120–5

132. Mehlisch DR, Weaver M, Fladung B: Ketoprofen, acetaminophen and placebo in the treatment of tension headache. Headache 1998; 38:579–89

133. van den Berghe LI, de Boever JA, Schautteet H: Double-blind clinical study of piroxicam as adjuvant in the treatment of the pain and dysfunction of temporomandibular joints. Cranio 1986; 4:352–6

134. Ekberg E: Treatment of temporomandibular disorders of arthrogenous origin. Swed Dent J Suppl 1998; 131:1–57

135. Thie NM, Prasad NG, Major PW: Evaluation of glucosamine sulfate compared to ibuprofen for the treatment of temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis: A randomized double-blind controlled 3 month clinical trial. J Rheumatol 2001; 28:1347–55

136. Simon LS: Biologic effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Curr Opin Rheumatol 1997; 9:178–82

137. Brandt KD: Should nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs be used to treat osteoarthritis? Rheum Dis Clin North Am 1993; 19:29–44

138. Drovanti A, Bignamini AA, Rovati AL: Therapeutic activity of oral glucosamine sulphate in osteoarthrosis: A placebo-controlled double-blind investigation. Clin Ther 1980; 3:160–72

139. Tapadinhas MJ, Rivera IC, Bignamini AA: Oral glucosamine sulphate in the management of arthrosis: Report on a multi-centre open investigation in Portugal. Pharmatherapeutica 1982; 3:157–68

140. Truelove EL: The chemotherapeutic management of chronic and persistent orofacial pain. Dent Clin North Am 1994; 38:669–88

141. Dionne RA, Berthold CW: Therapeutic uses of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in dentistry. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2001; 12:315–30

142. Woolsey RM, Tureen LL, Murphy MQ: The relief of muscle spasm and pain with chlormezanone and chlormezanone with aspirin: A blind, crossover study. Curr Ther Res 1966; 8:52–5

143. Amlie E, Weber H, Holme I: Treatment of acute low-back pain with piroxicam: Results of a double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Spine 1987; 12:473–6

144. Pohjolainen T, Jekunen A, Autio L, Vuorela H: Treatment of acute low back pain with the COX-2 selective anti-inflammatory drug nimesulide. Spine 2000; 25:1579–85

145. Veenema KR, Leahey N, Schneider S: Ketorolac versus meperidine: ED treatment of severe musculoskeletal low back pain. Am J Emerg Med 2000; 18:404–7

146. Naguib M, Farag H, Magbagbeola JA: Effect of pre-treatment with lysine acetyl salicylate on suxamethonium-induced myalgia. Br J Anaesth 1987; 59:606–10

147. Kahraman S, Ercan S, Aypar U, Erdem K: Effect of pre-operative i. m. administration of diclofenac on suxamethonium-induced myalgia. Br J Anaesth 1993; 71:238–41

148. Leeson-Payne CG, Nicoll JM, Hobbs GJ: Use of ketorolac in the prevention of suxamethonium myalgia. Br J Anaesth 1994; 73:788–90

149. Scott AB: Botulinum toxin injection into extraocular muscles as an alternative to strabismus surgery. Ophthalmology 1980; 87:1044–9

150. Tsui JK, Eisen A, Stoessl AJ, Calne S, Calne JB: Double-blind study of botulinum toxin in spasmodic torticollis. Lancet 1986; 2:245–7

151. Borodic GE, Acquadro M, Johnson EA: Botulinum toxin therapy for pain and inflammatory disorders: Mechanisms and therapeutic effects. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2001; 10:1531–4

152. Ishikawa H, Mitsui Y, Yoshitomi T, Mashimo K, Aoki S, Mukuno K, Shimizu K: Presynaptic effects of botulinum toxin type A on the neuronally evoked response of albino and pigmented rabbit iris sphincter and dilator muscles. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2000; 44:106–9

153. Welch MJ, Purkiss JR, Foster KA: Sensitivity of embryonic rat dorsal root ganglia neurons to clostridium botulinum neurotoxins. Toxicon 2000; 38:245–58

154. Aoki KR: Evidence for antinociceptive activity of botulinum toxin type A in pain management. Headache 2003; 43 (suppl 1):S9–15

155. Binder WJ, Brin MF, Blitzer A, Schoenrock LD, Pogoda JM: Botulinum toxin type A (BOTOX) for treatment of migraine headaches: An open-label study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000; 123:669–76

156. Brans JW, Lindeboom RN, Snoek JW, Zwarts MJ, van Weerden TW, Brunt ER, van Hilten JJ, van der Kamp W, Prins MH, Speelman JD: Botulinum toxin versus trihexylphenidyl in cervical dystonia: A prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled trial. Neurology 1996; 46:1066–72

157. Lew MF, Adornato BT, Duane DD, Dykstra DD, Factor SA, Massey JM, Brin MF, Jankovic J, Rodnitzky RL, Singer C, Swenson MR, Tarsy D, Murray JJ, Koller M, Wallace JD: Botulinum toxin type B: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, safety and efficacy study in cervical dystonia. Neurology 1997; 49:701–7

158. Brin MF, Lew MF, Adler CH, Comella CL, Factor SA, Jankovic J, O’Brien C, Murray JJ, Wallace JD, Willmer-Hulme A, Koller M: Safety and efficacy of Neurobloc (botulinum toxin type B) in type A-resistant cervical dystonia. Neurology 1999; 53:1431–8

159. Foster L, Clapp L, Erickson M, Jabbari B: Botulinum toxin A and chronic low back pain: A randomized, double-blind study. Neurology 2001; 56:1290–3

160. Childers MK, Wilson DJ, Gnatz SM, Conway RR, Sherman AK: Botulinum toxin type A in piriformis muscle syndrome: A pilot study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 81:751–9

161. Fishman LM, Anderson C, Rosner B: BOTOX and physical therapy in the treatment of piriformis syndrome. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 81:936–42

162. Wheeler AH, Goolkasian P, Gretz SS: A randomized, double-blind, prospective pilot study of botulinum toxin injection for refractory, unilateral, cervicothoracic, paraspinal, myofascial pain syndrome. Spine 1998; 23:1662–7

163. Porta M: A comparative trial of botulinum toxin type A and methylprednisolone for the treatment of myofascial pain syndrome and pain from chronic muscle spasm. Pain 2000; 85:101–5

164. Smuts JA, Baker MK, Smuts HM, Stassen R, Rossouw E, Barnard PW: Prophylactic treatment of chronic tension-type headache using botulinum toxin type A. Eur J Neurol 1999; 6 (suppl 4):S99–102

165. Porta M: A comparative trial of botulinum toxin A and methylprednisolone for the treatment of tension-type headache. Curr Rev Pain 2000; 4:31–5

166. Relja M: Treatment of tension-type headache by local injection of botulinum toxin. Eur J Neurol 1997; 4 (suppl 2):S71–3

167. Schmitt WJ, Slowey E, Fravi N, Weber S, Burgunder J-M: Effect of botulinum toxin A injections in the treatment of chronic tension-type headache: A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Headache 2001; 41:658–64

168. Zwart J-A, Bovim G, Sand T, Sjaastad O: Tension headache: Botulinum toxin paralysis of temporal muscles. Headache 1994; 34:458–62

169. Rollnik JD, Karst M, Fink M, Dengler R: Botulinum toxin type A and EMG: A key to the understanding of chronic tension-type headaches? Headache 2001; 41:985–9

170. Rollnik JD, Tanneberger O, Schubert M, Schneider U, Dengler R: Treatment of tension-type headache with botulinum toxin type A: A double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Headache 2000; 40:300–5

171. Freund BJ, Schwartz M: Use of botulinum toxin in chronic whiplash-associated disorder. Clin J Pain 2002; 18:S163–8

172. Nederhand MJ, Ijzerman MJ, Hermens HJ, Baten CT, Zilvold G: Cervical muscle dysfunction in the chronic whiplash associated disorder grade II (WAD-II). Spine 2000; 25:1938–43

173. Freund BJ, Schwartz M: Treatment of whiplash associated with neck pain with botulinum toxin-A: A pilot study. J Rheumatol 2000; 27:481–4

174. Freund BJ, Schwartz M: Treatment of chronic cervical-associated headache with botulinum toxin A: A pilot study. Headache 2000; 40:231–6

175. Borodic GE, Acquadro MA: The use of botulinum toxin for the treatment of chronic facial pain. J Pain 2002; 3:21–7

176. von Lindern JJ, Niederhagen B, Berge S, Appel T: Type A botulinum toxin in the treatment of chronic facial pain associated with masticatory hyperactivity. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003; 61:774–8

177. Freund B, Schwartz M, Symington JM: Botulinum toxin: New treatment for temporomandibular disorders. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000; 38:466–71

178. von Lindern JJ: Type A botulinum toxin in the treatment of chronic facial pain associated with temporo-mandibular dysfunction. Acta Neurol Belg 2001; 101:39–41

179. Mathias B, Dillingham T, Zeigler D, Chang A, Belandres P: Topical capsaicin for chronic neck pain. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1995; 74:39–44

180. Moss HK, Herrmann LG: Use of quinine for relief of ‘night cramps’ in the extremities. JAMA 1940; 115:1358–9

181. Gotnick A: Night cramps and quinine. Arch Intern Med 1943; 71:555–62

182. Jones K, Castleden CM: A double-blind comparison of quinine sulphate and placebo in muscle cramps. Age Ageing 1983; 12:155–8

183. Jansen PH, Veenhuizen KC, Verbeek AL, Straatman H: Efficacy of hydroquinine in preventing frequent ordinary muscle cramp outlasts actual administration. Lancet 1997; 349:528–32

184. Lee FY, Lee SD, Tsai YT, Lai KH, Chao Y, Lin HC, Wang SS, Lo KJ: A randomized controlled trial of quinidine in the treatment of cirrhotic patients with muscle cramps. J Hepatol 1991; 12:236–40

185. Fung MC, Holbrook JH: Placebo-controlled trial of quinine therapy for nocturnal leg cramps. West J Med 1989; 151:42–4

186. Diener HC, Dethlefsen U, Dethlefsen-Gruber S, Verbeek P: Effectiveness of quinine in treating muscle cramps: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicentre trial. Int J Clin Pract 2002; 56:243–6

187. Kaji DM, Ackad A, Nottage WG, Stein RM: Prevention of muscle cramps in hemodialysis patients by quinine sulphate. Lancet 1976; 2:66–7

188. Lim SH: Randomised double-blind trial comparison of quinine sulphate for nocturnal leg cramps. Br J Clin Pract 1986; 40:462

189. Warburton A, Royston JP, O’Neill CJ, Nicholson PW, Jee RD, Denham MJ, Dobbs SM, Dobbs RJ: A quinine a day keeps the leg cramps away? Br J Clin Pharmacol 1987; 23:459–65

190. Sidorov J: Quinine sulfate for leg cramps: Does it work? J Am Geriatr Soc 1993; 41:498–500

191. Dahle LO, Berg G, Hummar M, Hurtig M, Larsson L: The effect of oral magnesium substitution on pregnancy-induced leg cramps. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 173:175–80

192. Roffe C, Sills S, Crome P, Jones P: Randomised, cross-over, placebo controlled trial of magnesium citrate in the treatment of chronic persistent leg cramps. Med Sci Monit 2002; 8:CR326–30

193. Frusso R, Zarate M, Augustovski F, Rubinstein A: Magnesium for the treatment of nocturnal leg cramps: A cross over randomized trial. J Fam Pract 1999; 48:868–71

194. Butler JV, Mulkerrin EC, O’Keefe ST: Nocturnal leg cramps in older people. Postgrad Med J 2002; 76:596–8

195. Del Mar CB, Glasziou PP, Spinks AP, Sanders SL, Hilton DJ: Treatment alternatives for nocturnal leg cramps (commentary). Med J Aust 2001; 174:540

196. Young JB, Connolly MJ: Naftidrofuryl treatment for rest cramp. Postgrad Med J 1993; 69:624–6

197. Medina Santillan R, Reyes Garcia G, Sanchez Mejia JL, Mateos Garcia E: Dexamethasone alone versus dexamethasone plus complex B vitamins in the therapy of low back pain. Proc West Pharmacol Soc 2000; 43:69–70

198. Reyes-Garcia G, Medina-Santillan R, Castillo-Henkel E, Rodriguez-Silverio J, Teran-Rosales F, Mateos-Garcia E: Analgesic effect of sodium diclofenac plus vitamin B complex in the PIFIR model. Proc West Pharm Soc 1999; 42:91–92

199. Allgood VE, Oakley RH, Cidlowski JA: Modulation by vitamin B6 of glucocorticoid receptor-mediated gene expression requires transcription factors in addition to the glucocorticoid receptor. J Biol Chem 1993; 268:20870–6

200. Roca AO, Jarjoura D, Blend D, Cugino A, Rutecki GW, Nuchikat PS, Whittier FC: Dialysis leg cramps: Efficacy of quinine versus vitamin E. ASAIO J 1992; 38:M481–5

201. Khajehdehi P, Mojerlou M, Behzadi S, Rais-Jalali GA: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of supplementary vitamins E, C and their combination for treatment of haemodialysis cramps. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2001; 16:1448–51

202. Connolly PS, Shirley EA, Wasson JH, Nierenberg DW: Treatment of nocturnal leg cramps: A crossover trial of quinine vs vitamin E. Arch Intern Med 1992; 152:1877–80

203. Watanabe M, Tabata T, Huh JI, Inai T, Tsuboi A, Sasaki K, Endo Y: Possible involvement of histamine in muscular fatigue in temporomandibular disorders: Animal and human studies. J Dent Res 1999; 78:769–75

204. Gerschman JA, Reade PD, Burrows GD: Evaluation of a proprietary analgesic/antihistamine in the management of pain associated with temporomandibular joint pain dysfunction syndrome. Aust Dent J 1984; 29:300–4

205. Sawynok J, Yaksh TL: Caffeine as an analgesic adjuvant: A review of pharmacology and mechanisms of action. Pharmacol Rev 1993; 45:43–85

206. Migliardi JR, Armellino JJ, Friedman M, Gillings DB, Beaver WT: Caffeine as an analgesic adjuvant in tension headache. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1994; 50:576–86

207. Ward N, Whitney C, Avery D, Dunner D: The analgesic effects of caffeine in headache. Pain 1991; 44:151–5

208. Schachtel BP, Thoden WR, Konerman JP, Brown A, Chaing DS: Headache pain model for assessing and comparing the efficacy of over-the counter analgesic agents. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1991; 50:322–9

209. Diamond S, Balm TK, Freitag FG: Ibuprofen plus caffeine in the treatment of tension-type headache. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2000; 68:312–9

210. Borges J, Zavaleta C: Study of a new analgesic compound in the treatment of tension headache. J Int Med Res 1976; 4:74–8

211. Wojcicki J, Samochowiec L, Lawczynski L, Szwed G, Olszewska M: A double-blind comparative evaluation of aspirin, paracetamol and paracetamol + caffeine (Finimal) for their analgesic effectiveness. Arch Immunol Ther Exper (Warsz) 1977; 25:175–9

212. Gorlich HD, von Gablenz E, Steinberg HW: Treatment of nocturnal leg cramps. A multicenter, double blind, placebo controlled comparison between the combination of quinine and theophylline ethylene diamine with quinine (in German). Arzneimittelforschung 1991; 41:167–75

213. Martinez-Martin P, Raffaelli E Jr, Titus F, Despuig J, Fragoso YD, Diez-Tejedor E, Liano H, Leira R, Cornet ME, van Toor BS, Camara J, Peil H, Vix JM, Ortiz P, Co-operative Study Group: Efficacy and safety of metamizol vs. acetylsalicylic acid in patients with moderate episodic tension-type headache: A randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled, multicentre study. Cephalagia 2001; 21:604–10

214. Bigal ME, Bordini CA, Speciali JG: Intravenous metamizol (Dipyrone) in acute migraine treatment and episodic tension-type headache: A placebo-controlled study. Cephalagia 2001; 21:90–5

215. Bigal ME, Bordini CA, Speciali JG: Intravenous dipyrone for the treatment of episodic tension-type headache: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study. Braz J Med Biol Res 2002; 35:1139–45

216. Lujan M, Lopez-Fiesco A, Lopez y Martinez E, Zamora Lopez G, Alvarez Rueda M: Experimental tension headache in humans: A double blind comparison of the analgesic effect of Dipyrone, naproxen plus paracetamol or placebo. Proc West Pharmacol Soc 1992; 35:201–5

217. Bellinghieri G, Savica V, Mallamace A, Di Stefano C: Correlation between increased serum and tissue L-carnitine levels and improved muscle symptoms in hemodialyzed patients. Am J Clin Nutr 1983; 38:523–31

218. Ahmad S, Robertson HT, Golper TA, Wolfson M, Kurtin P, Katz LA, Hirschberg R, Nicora R, Ashbrook DW, Kopple JD: Multicenter trial of L-carnitine in maintenance hemodialysis patients: II. Clinical and biochemical effects. Kidney Int 1990; 38:912–8

219. Bourke E, Moynagh PN: Antiinflammatory effects of glucocorticoids in brain cells, independent of NF-kappa B. J Immunol 1999; 163:2113–9

220. Wenneberg B, Kopp S: Short-term effect of intra-articular injections of a corticosteroid on temporomandibular joint pain and dysfunction. Swed Dent J 1978; 2:189–96

221. Kopp S, Wenneberg B: Effects of occlusal treatment and intraarticular injections on temporomandibular joint pain and dysfunction. Acta Odontol Scand 1981; 39:87–96

222. Kopp S, Carlsson GE, Haraldson T, Wenneberg B: Long-term effect of intra-articular injections of sodium hyaluronate and corticosteroid on temporomandibular joint arthritis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1987; 45:929–35

223. Majwer K, Swider M: Results of treatment with ionophoresis of posttraumatic changes of temporomandibular joints with an apparatus of own design [in Polish]. Protet Stomatol 1989; 39:172–6

224. Reid KI, Dionne RA, Sicard-Rosenbaum L, Lord D, Dubner RA: Evaluation of iontophoretically applied dexamethasone for painful pathologic temporomandibular joints. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1994; 77:605–9

225. Aggarwal S, Kumar A: A cortisone-wrecked and bony alkylosed TMJ. Plast Reconstr Surg 1986; 83:1084–5

226. Acton CH: Steroid-induced anterior open bite: Case report. Aust Dent J 1986; 31:455–8

227. Sfikakis PP, Mitsikostas DD, Manoussakis MN, Foukaneli D, Moutsopoulos HM: Headache in systemic lupus erythematosus: A controlled study. Br J Rheumatol 1998; 37:300–3

228. Leong KH, Boey ML: Inflammatory myopathies. Singapore Med J 1992; 33:186–8

229. Polsonetti BW, Joy SD, Laos LF: Steroid-induced myopathy in the ICU. Ann Pharmacother 2002; 36:1741–4

230. Bird SJ, Rich MM: Critical illness myopathy and polyneuropathy. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2002; 2:527–33

231. Fogelholm R, Murros K: Maprotiline in chronic tension headache: A double-blind, crossover study. Headache 1985; 25:273–5

232. Indaco A, Carrieri PB: Amitriptyline in the treatment of headache in patients with Parkinson’s disease: A double-blind placebo-controlled study. Neurology 1988; 38:1720–2

233. Langemark M, Loldrup D, Bech P, Olesen J: Clomipramine and mianserin in the treatment of chronic tension headache: A double-blind, controlled study. Headache 1990; 30:118–21

234. Sjaastad O: So-called ‘tension headache’—The response to a 5-HT uptake inhibitor: Femoxetine. Cephalagia 1983; 3:53–60

235. Saper JR, Silberstein SD, Lake AE III, Winters ME: Double-blind trial of fluoxetine: Chronic daily headache and migraine. Headache 1994; 34:497–502

236. Manna V, Bolino F, DiCicco L: Chronic tension-type headache, mood depression, and serotonin: Therapeutic effects of fluvoxamine and mianserine. Headache 1994; 34:44–9

237. Gobel H, Hamouz V, Hansen C, Heininger K, Hirsch S, Lindner V, Heuss D, Soyka D: Chronic tension-type headache: Amitriptyline reduces clinical headache-duration and experimental pain but does not alter pericranial muscle activity readings. Pain 1994; 59:241–9

238. Singh NN, Misra S: Sertraline in chronic tension-type headache. J Assoc Physicians India 2002; 50:873–8

239. Pfaffenrath V, Diener HC, Isler H, Meyer C, Scholz E, Taneri Z, Wessely P, Zaiser-Kaschel H, Haase W, Fischer W: Efficacy and tolerability of amitriptylinoxide in the treatment of chronic tension-type headache: A multi-centre controlled study. Cephalagia 1994; 14:149–55

240. Langemark M, Olesen J: Sulpiride and paroxetine in the treatment of chronic tension-type headache: An explanatory double-blind trial. Headache 1994; 34:20–4

241. Lascelles RG: Atypical facial pain and depression. Br J Psychiatry 1966; 112:651–9

242. Rizzatti-Barbosa CM, Nogueira MT, de Andrade ED, Ambrosano GM, de Albergaria Barbosa JR: Clinical evaluation of amitriptyline for the control of chronic pain caused by temporomandibular joint disorders. Cranio 2003; 21:221–5

243. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society: Classification and diagnostic criteria for headache disorders, cranial neuralgias and facial pain. Cephalagia 1988; 8(suppl 7):1–96

244. Franks AST: Mandibular muscle spasm: A double-blind study of a muscle relaxant drug. Br J Clin Prac 1965; 19:281–8

245. Basmajian JV: Acute back pain and spasm: A controlled multicenter trial of combined analgesic and antispasm agents. Spine 1989; 14:438–9

246. Larsson B, Melin L, Doberi A: Recurrent tension headache in adolescents treated with self-help relaxation training and a muscle relaxant drug. Headache 1990; 30:665–71

247. Borenstein DG, Lacks S, Wiesel SW: Cyclobenzaprine and naproxen versus naproxen alone in the treatment of acute low back pain and muscle spasm. Clin Ther 1990; 12:125–31

248. Valtonen EJ: A controlled clinical trial of chlormezanone, orphenadrine, orphenadrine/paracetamol and placebo in the treatment of painful skeletal muscle spasms. Ann Clin Res 1975; 7:85–8

249. Miller AR: A comparative study of Parafon Forte tablets and Soma compound in the treatment of painful skeletal muscle conditions. Curr Ther Res 1976; 19:444–50

250. Vernon WG: A double-blind study of Parafon Forte in the treatment of musculo-skeletal back conditions. Curr Ther Res 1972; 14:801–6

251. Scheiner JJ: Evaluation of a combined muscle relaxant-analgesic as an effective therapy for painful skeletal muscle spasm. Curr Ther Res 1972; 14:168–77

252. Atkinson D: A single dose placebo-controlled study to assess the effectiveness of adding a muscle relaxant to a compound analgesic in the treatment of tension headache. J Int Med Res 1979; 7:560–63

253. Diamond S: Double-blind study of metaxalone: Use as skeletal-muscle relaxant. JAMA 1966; 195:479–80

254. Perchuk E, Weinreb M, Aksu A: A new treatment for nocturnal leg cramps. Angiology 1961; 12:102–4

255. Turturro MA, Frater CR, D’Amico FJ: Cyclobenzaprine with ibuprofen versus ibuprofen alone in acute myofascial strain: A randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Ann Emerg Med 2003; 41:818–26

256. Borenstein DG, Korn S: Efficacy of a low-dose regimen of cyclobenzaprine hydrochloride in acute skeletal muscle spasm: Results of two placebo-controlled trials. Clin Ther 2003; 25:1056–73

257. Tuzun F, Unalan H, Oner N, Ozguzel H, Kirazli Y, Icagasioglu A, Kuran B, Tuzun S, Basar G: Multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of thiocolchicoside in acute low back pain. Joint Bone Spine 2003; 70:356–61

258. Lipton RB, Stewart WF, Cady R, Hall C, O’Quinn S, Kuhn T, Gutterman D: Sumatriptan for the range of headaches in migraine sufferers: Results of the Spectrum Study. Headache 2000; 40:783–91

259. Roldan OV, Maglione H, Carreira R, Mainieri S: Piroxicam, diazepam and placebo in the treatment of temporomandibular joint dysfunction. Double blind study (in Spanish). Rev Assoc Odontol Argent 1990; 78:83–5

260. Bouchier-Hayes TA, Rotman H, Darekar BS: Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of diclofenac gel (Voltarol Emulgel) and felbinac gel (Traxam) in the treatment of soft tissue injuries. Br J Clin Pract 1990; 44:319–20

261. Birch S, Jamison RN: Controlled trial of Japanese acupuncture for chronic myofascial neck pain: Assessment of specific and nonspecific effects of treatment. Clin J Pain 1998; 14:248–55

262. Prior MJ, Cooper KM, May LG, Bowen DL: Efficacy and safety of acetaminophen and naproxen in the treatment of tension-type headache: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Cephalagia 2002; 22:740–8

263. Kubitzek F, Ziegler G, Gold MS, Liu JM, Ionescu E: Low-dose diclofenac potassium in the treatment of episodic tension-type headache. Eur J Pain 2003; 7:155–62

264. Steiner TJ, Lange R, Voelker M: Aspirin in episodic tension-type headache: Placebo-controlled dose-ranging comparison with paracetamol. Cephalagia 2003; 23:59–66

265. Cheshire WP, Abashian SW, Mann JD: Botulinum toxin in the treatment of myofascial pain syndrome. Pain 1994; 59:65–9

266. Keizer SB, Rutten HP, Pilot P, Morre HH, v Os JJ, Verburg AD: Botulinum toxin injection versus surgical treatment for tennis elbow: A randomized pilot study. Clin Orthop 2002; 401:125–31

267. Nixdorf DR, Heo G, Major PW: Randomized controlled trial of botulinum toxin A for chronic myogenous orofacial pain. Pain 2002; 99:465–73

268. Jordan SE, Ahn SS, Freischlag JA, Gelabert HA, Machleder HI: Selective botulinum chemodenervation of the scalene muscles for treatment of neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome. Ann Vasc Surg 2000; 14:365–9

269. Ondo WG, Vuong KD, Derman HS: Botulinum toxin A for chronic daily headache: A randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel design study. Cephalagia 2004; 24:60–5

270. Catto GRD, Smith FW, MacLeod M: Treatment of muscle cramps during maintenance haemodialysis. BMJ 1973; 3:389–90

271. Jansen PH, Veenhuizen KC, Verbeek AL, Straatman H: Efficacy of hydroquinine in preventing ordinary muscle cramp outlasts actual administration. J Neurol Sci 1994; 122:157–61

272. Thorpe P: Controlled and uncontrolled studies on “Fiorinal-PA” for symptomatic relief in tension headache. Med J Aust 1970; 2:180–1

273. Kagan G, Masheter HC: A controlled study of short-term treatment of tension headache. Curr Med Res Opin 1978; 5:709–13

274. Dao TT, Knight K, Ton-That V: Modulation of myofascial pain by the reproductive hormones: A preliminary report. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 79:663–70

275. Lin Y, Pape H-D, Friedrich R: Use of superoxide dismutase (SOD) in patients with temporomandibular joint dysfunction: A preliminary study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1994; 23:428–9

276. Guidotti FP, Dilluvio V: Oral treatment of skeletal muscle spasm with fluphenazine alone and combined with orphenadrine. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp 1965; 7:693–6

277. Ayres S Jr, Mihan R: Nocturnal leg cramps (systremma): A progress report on response to vitamin E. South Med J 1974; 67:1308–12

278. Saltman PBL: Syndol in the treatment of tension headache. Med Proc 1973; 19:35–7

279. Scheepers F: Syndol in the treatment of tension headache. Med Proc 1971; 17:359–68

280. Bigal ME, Bordini CA, Speciali JG: Intravenous chlorpromazine in the treatment of episodic tension-type headache: A randomized, placebo controlled, double-blind study. Ar Qneuropsiquiatr 2002; 60:537–41

281. Bengtsson A, Henriksson KG, Larsson J: Reduced high-energy phosphate levels in the painful muscles of patients with primary fibromyalgia. Arthritis Rheum 1986; 29:817–21

282. Lindman R, Eriksson A, Thornell LE: Fiber type composition of the human female trapezius muscle: Enzyme-histochemical characteristics. Am J Anat 1991; 190:385–92

283. Lindman R, Hagberg M, Angqvist KA, Soderlund K, Hultman E, Thornell LE: Changes in muscle morphology in chronic trapezius myalgia. Scand J Work Environ Health 1991; 17:347–55

284. Simms RW: Fibromyalgia is not a muscle disorder. Am J Med Sci 1998; 315:346–50

285. Staud R, Vierck CJ, Cannon RL, Mauderli AP, Price DD: Abnormal sensitization and temporal summation of second pain (wind-up) in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome. Pain 2001; 91:165–75

286. Staud R, Cannon RC, Mauderli AP, Robinson ME, Price DD, Vierck CJ Jr: Temporal summation of pain from mechanical stimulation of muscle tissue in normal controls and subjects with fibromyalgia syndrome. Pain 2003; 102:87–95

287. Ernberg M, Voog U, Alstergren P, Lundeberg T, Kopp S: Plasma and serum serotonin levels and their relationship to orofacial pain and anxiety in fibromyalgia. J Orofac Pain 2000; 14:37–46

288. Schwarz MJ, Spath M, Muller-Bardorff H, Pongratz DE, Bondy B, Ackenheil M: Relationship of substance P, 5-hydroxyindole acetic acid and tryptophan in serum fibromyalgia patients. Neurosci Lett 1999; 259:196–8

289. Larson AA, Giovengo SL, Russel IJ, Michalek JE: Changes in the concentrations of amino acids in the cerebrospinal fluid that correlate with pain in patients with fibromyalgia: Implications for nitric oxide pathways. Pain 2000; 87:201–11

290. Griep EN, Boersma JW, Lentjes EG, Prins AP, van der Korst JK, de Kloet ER: Function of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in patients with fibromyalgia and low back pain. J Rheumatol 1998; 25:1374–81

291. Salemi S, Rethage, Wollina U, Michel BA, Gay RE, Gay S, Sprott H: Detection of interleukin 1beta (IL-1 beta), IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha in skin of patients with fibromyalgia. J Rheumatol 2003; 30:146–50

292. Staud R: Evidence of involvement of central neural mechanisms in generating fibromyalgia pain. Curr Rheumatol Rep 2002; 4:299–305

293. Bussone G: Chronic migraine and chronic tension-type headache: Different aspects of the chronic daily headache spectrum. Clinical and pathogenetic considerations. Neurol Sci 2003; 24 (suppl 2):S90–3

294. Jensen R: Peripheral and central mechanisms in tension-type headache: An update. Cephalagia 2003; 23 (suppl 1):49–52

295. Fusco M, D’Andrea G, Micciche F, Stecca A, Bernardini D, Cananzi AL: Neurogenic inflammation in primary headaches. Neurol Sci 2003; 24 (suppl 2):S61–4

296. Sandrini G, Antonaci F, Pucci E, Bono G, Nappi G: Comparative study with EMG, pressure algometry and manual palpation in tension-type headache and migraine. Cephalagia 1994; 14:451–7

297. Altura BM, Altura BT: Tension headaches and muscle tension: Is there a role for magnesium? Med Hypotheses 2001; 57:705–13

298. Difazio M, Jabbari B: A focused review of the use of botulinum toxins for low back pain. Clin J Pain 2002; 18:S155–62

299. Ambroz C, Scott A, Ambroz A, Talbott EO: Chronic low back pain assessment using surface electromyography. J Occup Environ Med 2000; 42:660–9

300. Nelson BW, O’Reilly E, Miller M, Hogan M, Wegner JA, Kelly C: The clinical effects of intensive, specific exercise on chronic low back pain: A controlled study of 895 consecutive patients with 1-year follow up. Orthopedics 1995; 18:971–81

301. Leinonen V, Kankaanpaa M, Luukkonen M, Kansanen M, Hannimen O, Airaksinen O, Taimela S: Lumbar paraspinal muscle function, perception of lumbar position, and postural control in disc herniation-related back pain. Spine 2003; 28:842–8

302. Stohler CS: Phenomenology, epidemiology, and natural progression of the muscular temporomandibular disorders. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997; 83:77–81

303. List T, Dworkin SF: Comparing TMD diagnoses and clinical findings at Swedish and US TMD centers using research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders. J Orofac Pain 1996; 10:240–53

304. Yap AU, Dworkin SF, Chua EK, List T, Tan KB, Tan HH: Prevalence of temporomandibular disorder subtypes, psychologic distress, and psychosocial dysfunction in Asian patients. J Orofac Pain 2003; 17:21–8

305. Pinho JC, Caldas FM, Mora MJ, Santana-Penin U: Electromyographic activity in patients with temporomandibular disorders. J Oral Rehabil 2000; 27:985–90

306. Crider AB, Glaros AG: A meta-analysis of EMG biofeedback treatment of temporomandibular disorders. J Orofac Pain 1999; 13:29–37

307. Goldstein BH: Temporomandibular disorders: A review of current understanding. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999; 88:379–85

308. Norris FH, Gasteiger EL, Chatfield PO: An electromyographic study of induced and spontaneous muscle cramps. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1957; 9:139–47

309. McGee SR: Muscle cramps. Arch Intern Med 1990; 150:511–8

310. Denny-Brown D: Clinical problems in neuromuscular physiology. Am J Med 1953; 15:368–90

311. McCance RA: Experimental sodium chloride deficiency in man. Proc R Soc Lond Biol 1936; 119:245–68

312. Araki S, Terao A, Matsumoto I, Narazaki T, Kuroiwa Y: Muscle cramps in chronic thyrotoxic myopathy. Arch Neurol 1986; 19:315–20

313. Simons DG, Travell JG, Simons LS: Travell and Simons’ Myofascial Pain and Dysfunction: The Trigger Point Manual. Vol 1, 2nd edition. Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins, 1999, pp 11–93

314. Gerwin RD, Shannon S, Hong CZ, Hubbard D, Gevirtz R: Interrater reliability in myofascial trigger point examination. Pain 1997; 69:65–73

315. Wolfe F, Simons DG, Fricton J, Bennett RM, Goldenberg DL, Gerwin R, Hathaway D, McCain GA, Russel IJ, Sanders HO, Skootsky SA: The fibromyalgia and myofascial pain syndromes: A preliminary study of tender points and trigger points in persons with fibromyalgia, myofascial pain syndrome and no disease. J Rheumatol 1992; 19:944–51

316. Sola AE, Rodenberger ML, Gettys BB: Incidence of hypersensitive areas in posterior shoulder muscles. Am J Phys Med 1955; 34:585–90

317. Frohlich D, Frohlich R: Piriformis syndrome: A frequent item in the differential diagnosis of lumbogluteal pain. Manuelle Med 1995; 33:7–10

318. Hong CZ, Simons DG: Pathophysiologic and electrophysiologic mechanisms of myofascial trigger points. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998; 79:863–72

319. Simons DG, Hong CZ, Simons LS: Prevalence of spontaneous electrical activity at trigger spots and at control sites in rabbit skeletal muscle. J Musculoskeletal Pain 1995; 3:35–48

320. Hubbard DR, Berkoff GM: Myofascial trigger points show spontaneous needle EMG activity. Spine 1993; 18:1803–7

321. Hubbard DR: Chronic and recurrent muscle pain: Pathophysiology and treatment, and review of pharmacologic studies. J Musculoskeletal Pain 1996; 4:123–43

322. Buchthal F, Rosenfalck P: Spontaneous electrical activity of human muscle. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1966; 20:321–36

323. Rivner MH: The neurophysiology of myofascial pain syndrome. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2001; 5:432–40

324. Bohr TW: Problems with myofascial pain syndrome and fibromyalgia syndrome. Neurology 1996; 46:593–7

Cited By:

This article has been cited 12 time(s).

Nature Reviews Rheumatology
Facet joint pain-advances in patient selection and treatment
Cohen, SP; Huang, JHY; Brummett, C
Nature Reviews Rheumatology, 9(2): 101-116.
10.1038/nrrheum.2012.198
CrossRef
Anaesthesia and Intensive Care
Comparative evaluation of Myolaxin and EMLA cream for attenuation of venous cannulation pain: A prospective, randomised, double blind study
Agarwal, A; Yadav, G; Gupta, D; Tandon, M; Dhiraaj, S; Singh, RK
Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, 35(5): 726-729.

European Journal of Pain
Botulinum toxin A for myofascial trigger point injection: A qualitative systematic review
Ho, KY; Tan, KH
European Journal of Pain, 11(5): 519-527.
10.1016/j.ejpain.2006.09.002
CrossRef
Pain Physician
Systematic Review of the Role of Sedation in Diagnostic Spinal Interventional Techniques
Smith, HS; Chopra, P; Patel, VB; Frey, ME; Rastogi, R
Pain Physician, 12(1): 195-206.

Pain
Benzodiazepines for neuropathic back pain: When the cure is worse than the disease
Cohen, SP
Pain, 149(3): 424-425.
10.1016/j.pain.2010.03.038
CrossRef
Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine
A prospective crossover comparison study of the single-needle and multiple-needle techniques for facet-joint medial branch block
Stojanovic, MP; Dey, D; Hord, ED; Zhou, YL; Cohen, SP
Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, 30(5): 484-490.
10.1016/j.rapm.2005.05.007
CrossRef
Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology
Temporomandibular dysfunction: an often overlooked cause of chronic headaches
Lupoli, TA; Lockey, RF
Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology, 99(4): 314-318.

Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology
Fundamentals of muscle pain, referred pain, and deep tissue hyperalgesia
Graven-Nielsen, T
Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology, 35(): 1-43.
10.1080/03009740600865980
CrossRef
Pain Practice
Prescription Patterns of Pain Medicine Physicians
Benzon, HT; Kendall, MC; Katz, JA; Benzon, HA; Malik, K; Cox, P; Dean, K; Avram, MJ
Pain Practice, 13(6): 440-450.
10.1111/papr.12011
CrossRef
Anesthesiology
Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Lumbar Zygapophysial (Facet) Joint Pain
Cohen, SP; Raja, SN
Anesthesiology, 106(3): 591-614.

PDF (1169)
Anesthesiology
Evidence against Trigger Point Injection Technique for the Treatment of Cervicothoracic Myofascial Pain with Botulinum Toxin Type A
Ferrante, FM; Bearn, L; Rothrock, R; King, L
Anesthesiology, 103(2): 377-383.

PDF (463)
Anesthesiology
Postpolio Syndrome and Anesthesia
Lambert, DA; Giannouli, E; Schmidt, BJ
Anesthesiology, 103(3): 638-644.

PDF (483)
Back to Top | Article Outline

© 2004 American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc.

Publication of an advertisement in Anesthesiology Online does not constitute endorsement by the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc. or Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. of the product or service being advertised.
Login

Article Tools

Images

Share