Skip Navigation LinksHome > January 2003 - Volume 98 - Issue 1 > Laryngoscopic Intubation: Learning and Performance
Anesthesiology:
Clinical Investigations

Laryngoscopic Intubation: Learning and Performance

Mulcaster, Julian T. M.D.*; Mills, Joanna Ph.D.†; Hung, Orlando R. M.D.‡; MacQuarrie, Kirk M.D.§; Law, J. Adam M.D.∥; Pytka, Saul M.D.#; Imrie, David M.D.‡; Field, Chris Ph.D.**

Free Access
Article Outline
Collapse Box

Author Information

Collapse Box

Abstract

Background: Many healthcare professionals are trained in direct laryngoscopic tracheal intubation (LEI), which is a potentially lifesaving procedure. This study attempts to determine the number of successful LEI exposures required during training to assure competent performance, with special emphasis on defining competence itself.
Methods: Analyses were based on a longitudinal study of novices under training conditions in the operating room. The progress of 438 LEIs performed by the 20 nonanesthesia trainees was monitored by observation and videotape analysis. Eighteen additional LEIs were performed by experienced anesthesiologists to define the standard. A generalized linear, mixed-modelling approach was used to identify key aspects of effective training and performance. The number of tracheal intubations that the trainees were required to perform before acquiring expertise in LEI was estimated.
Results: Subjects performed between 18 and 35 laryngoscopic intubations. However, statistical modeling indicates that a 90% probability of a “good intubation” required 47 attempts. Proper insertion and lifting of the laryngoscope were crucial to “good” or “competent” performance of LEI. Traditional features, such as proper head and neck positions, were found to be less important under the study conditions.
Conclusions: This study determined that traditional LEI teaching for nonanesthesia personnel using manikin alone is inadequate. A reevaluation of current standards in LEI teaching for nonanesthesia is required.
COMPETENCY in laryngoscopic tracheal intubation (LEI) is essential for many healthcare professionals. Failure to perform successful LEI can sometimes result in patient death. In a recent report by an urban emergency medical system in the United States, 25% of tracheal tubes inserted by paramedics in prehospital emergencies were misplaced, and approximately 50% of those patients with a misplaced tube died in the emergency department. 1 Unfortunately, there is little information to indicate the extent of the training required for competence in LEI, or even what signifies true competence. In general, airway training programs for healthcare personnel, such as paramedics and respiratory therapists, are not standardized and may be inadequate. This inadequacy is a grave concern, given the serious consequences of failed airway management.
With regard to the teaching of LEI to anesthesiology residents, Konrad et al.2 defined “success” arbitrarily as “adequate technical performance” without the assistance of a staff person. They described a learning curve that reached a 90% “success” rate after a mean of 57 attempts. However 18% of the residents still required assistance after 80 intubations. Unfortunately, no further analysis was carried out beyond “success” or “failure.”
Traditional teaching of LEI has focused on certain key aspects of successful intubation, including the technical details of proper head positioning with laryngoscope blade insertion and lift, as well as a timely and atraumatic performance.
The purpose of this prospective study was to determine how much LEI training experience is necessary before a novice can be considered competent. In addition, we assessed features of the process of LEI that were critical to a “good” intubation and signified competence.
Back to Top | Article Outline

Materials and Methods

Study Population
Following institutional review board approval (Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada) and informed consent, we recruited respiratory therapy students, paramedic students, and medical students scheduled to do a rotation in anesthesia. Any trainees with prior LEI experience or training were excluded. All trainees were formally trained in the theoretical aspects of LEI by a staff anesthesiologist (O. R. H.) and were required to perform a minimum of 20 successful intubations on manikins (Laerdal Medical Inc., Wappingers Falls, NY) prior to participating in the study. Healthy surgical patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status class I or II were recruited to the study, and informed consent was obtained. These patients showed no evidence of a potentially difficult LEI, and all required an endotracheal tube as part of their anesthetic management. Under a standardized anesthesia technique with muscle relaxation (2–3 μg/kg fentanyl, 1.5–2.5 mg/kg propofol, and 0.07–0.1 mg/kg vecuronium), these patients underwent LEI by the trainees, with an attending anesthesiologist present and providing ongoing supervision. Patients were excluded from the study if they had ASA physical status class III or greater or when an unexpected difficult LEI occurred. The goal was to evaluate between 20 and 30 trainee intubations. In addition, 18 LEIs were performed under study conditions by five staff anesthesiologists to serve as a control group. Each LEI was videotaped for analysis by a single independent staff anesthesiologist who was not involved in the study. To minimize the reviewer's recall (bias) of a specific trainee's intubation experience while reviewing the videotapes, each LEI was recorded randomly by 1 of 50 videotapes. The videotapes were then randomly reviewed by an independent anesthesiologist.
Back to Top | Article Outline
Evaluation of LEI
Table 1
Table 1
Image Tools
Failure to intubate was defined as either an inability to place the endotracheal tube after three attempts or, at the discretion of the staff anesthesiologist, when there was a significant alteration of the hemodynamic (hypertension and tachycardia) and respiratory parameters (O2 saturation < 90%) during LEI, requiring the intervention of the staff anesthesiologist. An attempt at LEI was defined as a single episode in which the laryngoscope was placed inside the oropharynx of the patient for the purpose of visualizing the laryngeal inlet to perform LEI. The total time of laryngoscopy (TTL) was defined as the sum of the times of all attempts at LEI for a given patient. The TTL and number of attempts, failures, and complications were recorded, as well as pertinent patient demographic information. All videotapes were reviewed by an anesthesiologist independent of the study who judged (scoring 0 for failure and 1 for success) each LEI attempt based on a number of objective and subjective scores as outlined in table 1.
Back to Top | Article Outline
Statistical Analysis
The data collected in this study consisted of repeated measurements on trainees and as such was complicated by the necessity to deal appropriately with the within-trainee dependence. Although a nuisance factor, this dependence must be taken into account to draw valid inferences. Recently, Heagerty 4 proposed marginally specified generalized linear mixed models, which are ideally suited to data of this format. Hence, a model was constructed using this approach and served both to define important criteria necessary for proficiency in LEI as well as to estimate the number of LEIs required to ensure competence (see Appendix).
Back to Top | Article Outline

Results

A total of 472 patients (158 male, 314 female; average age 45.6 ± 17.5 yr) underwent LEI during this longitudinal study. Of these, only 456 were suitable for analysis due to several incidences in which video footage was lost, information was missing, or an unanticipated difficult laryngoscopy was encountered. Eighteen of these patients were intubated by staff anesthesiologists to create the control group, resulting in 438 trainee LEIs studied. The mean (±SD) number of tracheal intubations by the trainees was 23.0 ± 4.1 (ranged between 18 and 35 tracheal intubations).
There were 20 trainees in total; 7 medical students (5 male, 2 female), 1 respiratory therapy student (female), and 12 student paramedics (9 male, 3 female). There were 41 failed intubations (9.4%). The mean (±SD) number of failures per trainee was 2.1 ± 1.8 (ranged between 0 and 6 failures). Among the 20 trainees, 5 did not have any failed LEIs. There were 104 complications (23.7%). Apart from one chipped tooth, all the complications were either minor mucosal lacerations or bleeding.
Table 2
Table 2
Image Tools
Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Image Tools
Total time of laryngoscopy, success rate, complication rate, and rate of “good” LEI are compared with the control group (staff anesthesiologists) and summarized in table 2.The relationship between LEI and TTL is shown in figure 1.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Image Tools
Having categorized each LEI attempt as “good” or “bad,” a statistical model was constructed using the Heagerty method (see Appendix). The model predicts that if a subject inserts and lifts the laryngoscope successfully and asks for appropriate help, he or she will have a 90% probability of performing a “good” LEI on trial 47 ± 11.2. Note that this result is outside the range of the data collected and therefore assumes the same learning process continues from trial 35 to trial 50. Alternatively, if we were to require that our estimate remain within the range of the data collected, we could set n (the number of trials) equal to 35. Fitting our model would then yield an estimate of the probability of performing a “good” LEI. We found that our model estimates that there is an 80% probability of performing a “good” intubation after 35 trials (fig. 2).
Back to Top | Article Outline

Discussion

It appears that considerable experience is required before a trainee becomes proficient in LEI. Our model predicts that if subjects insert and lift the laryngoscope successfully and ask for help when appropriate, they will have a 90% probability of performing a “good” intubation on trial 47 ± 11.2 (i.e., a successful intubation in < 30 s). This is consistent with the findings of Konrad's study. 2 They described a learning curve that reached a 90% “success” rate after a mean of 57 laryngoscopic intubations.
It must be emphasized that only uncomplicated LEIs under ideal and controlled conditions were included in this study. It has been estimated that between 1–3% of surgical patients have “difficult airways,” making laryngoscopic intubation difficult and sometimes impossible. 5 Clearly, the trainees, such as anesthesia residents, would require more than 47 laryngoscopic endotracheal intubations before gaining experience in managing the airway of a patient with a difficult or challenging laryngoscopy.
In terms of key predictors of a good LEI, it seems noteworthy that the traditional emphasis on optimal head and neck positions (sniffing position i.e., neck flexion and atlanto-occipital extension) do not significantly influence the perceived quality of an LEI in this study. This is in contrast to the emphasis given to head and neck positions in traditional teaching and the control group's reliable performance. It is possible that these head and neck positions may be of significance only in patients with difficult laryngoscopy and intubation and that “good LEI” can be achieved in most cases with less than traditionally taught or recommended technique or positioning. It is also possible that these findings may well reflect the fact that many of the videotape records began with the patient resting comfortably in the supine position with a pillow under the head, leaving the head and neck already well positioned for LEI. Furthermore, the findings of a recent study suggest that the traditional teaching using the “sniffing position” may not be helpful for direct laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. 6 Using magnetic resonance imaging, Adnet et al.6 showed that the classic “sniffing position” did not improve the alignment of the oral, pharyngeal, and laryngeal axes for direct laryngoscopy in awake volunteers. They also showed that simple extension of the atlanto-occipital joint alone in a patient lying on the table is beneficial in terms of glottic exposure. In a follow-up study with 456 anesthetized patients, Adnet et al.7 showed that the sniffing position did not provide a significant advantage over simple head extension for tracheal intubation. However, their data showed that the sniffing position appeared to be advantageous in patients with obesity or with a limited head extension. Clearly, the findings of our study and Adnet's studies 6–7 suggest that further evaluation of the “sniffing position” for optimal laryngoscopic condition is warranted.
Other potential study limitations include the following: (1) There are no well-defined, acceptable TTLs in the literature. As a consequence, for the purpose of this study, reviewer confidence was solicited and 30 s was determined to be an acceptable limit. (2) It was assumed that the patients undergoing LEI and training experiences were all similar and that our study subjects represent typical nonanesthesia healthcare providers being trained in LEI. (3) Although none of the trainees performed more than 35 LEIs in this study, the statistical analysis predicts that approximately 47 LEIs are required to assure competence. Future studies will be necessary to validate these results. (4) As all of the videotapes were reviewed by the same anesthesiologist, it is difficult to determine the reliability and validity of reviewer assessment of all the laryngoscopic intubations. However, with respect to the reviewer setting the standard, the control group exceeded the students in all areas of the 10-point score, suggesting that the reviewer can reliably identify the experienced from the novice.
This study has the advantage of providing a large sample of data that has been prospectively and consistently obtained, is longitudinal in nature, and is amenable to complex statistical analysis and meaningful interpretation. The statistical method can also be readily extended to identify key educational components in performance of technical skills in anesthesiology, such as insertion of epidural, arterial, and central venous catheters.
Though it has been possible with this study to demonstrate specific quantitative and qualitative objectives for successful training in LEI, it is doubtful that current training programs for other nonanesthesia personnel reflect these learnings. In fact, most of the current LEI training for many healthcare providers, including paramedics and nurses, primarily involves laryngoscopic intubation in manikins (e.g., during advanced cardiac life support training), with minimal experience in patients. 8 Despite effectively and successfully performing 20 tracheal intubations in manikins before the study, most trainees experienced initial LEI difficulties during the study even under ideal and controlled conditions with an average time to intubation of more than 1 min (table 2). These findings clearly suggest that the existing direct laryngoscopic intubation training, often using standard manikins alone, is inadequate for nonanesthesia healthcare workers. Understandably, the cost effectiveness of “adequate” training for these healthcare providers is an important issue. However, innovative methods in airway management training, delivered by highly qualified instructors using tools such as airway manikins with difficult airway features, or high-fidelity difficult airway simulators, may be possible solutions. 9–10 Future studies are required to determine the effectiveness of these difficult airway simulators in assessing LEI performance, as well as the LEI skills development and retention of these personnel. Strategies and directives in the development of guidelines and standards in airway training programs must be established to ensure LEI success as well as patient safety. Furthermore, emphasis should also be placed on effective ventilation and oxygenation using a bag-mask, laryngeal mask airway, and Combitube (Kendall-Sheridan Catheter Corp., Argyle, NY).
The authors thank Ms. Peggy Alexiadis and Mr. Corey Long (Research Associates, Department of Anesthesiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada) for their valuable audiovisual technical assistance for this project.
Back to Top | Article Outline
Appendix
To derive a suitable model for the data collected in this study, we must first define a response variable Yij. We therefore take Yij equal to 1 if individual i performs a “good” LEI on trial j and 0 otherwise. Examination of the control group established, for purposes of the study, what we could consider to be a “good” LEI. All LEIs performed by this group were completed successfully and in a short period of time, suggesting that a concise definition of a “good” LEI should include two elements: successful completion as well as some measure of the time required for the procedure. A preliminary analysis of trainee performance and subjective reviewer confidence suggested that “successful LEI completion in under 30 s” was a reasonable definition of a “good” LEI. Fitting models using “under 45 s” and “under 60 s” were also investigated and confirmed that “under 30 s” was the appropriate criterion. A “bad” LEI is one which falls outside of the limits defining a “good” intubation, that is, an unsuccessful attempt or one which takes more than a 30 s TTL.
Equation UA1
Equation UA1
Image Tools
Having categorized each LEI attempt as “good” or “bad,” a model was then constructed using the Heagerty method. The number of prior attempts at intubation was selected for scientific reasons and was therefore the covariate of primary interest. Preliminary model selection reduced the number of relevant covariates to four: number of attempts, insertion of the laryngoscope, lifting of the laryngoscope, and requesting help. The final model took the form:MATH where logit(x) = log(x) − log(1 − x), P(Yij = 1Xi) is the probability trainee i performs a good LEI attempt j, and Xijk, k = 1, …, 4 represents the important covariates (categories). For example, Xij2 is 1 if trainee i properly inserts the scope on LEI attempt j. β0 through β4 are the corresponding estimated coefficients, which can be transformed and reported as odds ratios (along with their SEs) as given in table 2. By way of illustration, the odds ratio for insertion of the laryngoscope can be interpreted as comparing the probability of performing a successful LEI for those who insert the laryngoscope successfully as compared to those who do not. That is, those who properly insert the laryngoscope are 2.56 times as likely to perform a successful LEI compared to those who could not insert the laryngoscope properly.
Table 3
Table 3
Image Tools
Our model also requires a second component to handle the possible correlation between the Yij. This second component is an additional parameter σ interpreted as the individual-level heterogeneity. The maximum likelihood estimate for the heterogeneity parameter was σ = 0.61 (e−0.49), indicating fairly small trainee-to-trainee variation in the odds of performing a “good” LEI (table 3).
The model can be used to predict how many LEIs must be performed before a trainee can be considered competent. That is, by requiring that each relevant LEI category be completed in a satisfactory manner (i.e., successful insertion of the laryngoscope) and also requiring a 90% probability of performing a “good” LEI, we are left with only one unknown in the model. Upon solving for this unknown (number of attempts at LEI), we found that the model predicts that if a subject inserts and lifts the laryngoscope successfully and asks for appropriate help, he or she will have a 90% probability of performing a “good” LEI on trial 47 ± 11.2. Note that this result is outside the range of the data collected and therefore assumes the same learning process continues from trial 35 to trial 50. Alternatively, if we were to require that our estimate remain within the range of the data collected, we could set n equal to 35. Fitting our model would then yield an estimate of the probability of performing a “good” LEI. We found that our model estimates that there is an 80% probability of performing a “good” intubation after 35 trials. Cited Here...
Back to Top | Article Outline

References

1. Katz SH, Falk JL: Misplaced endotracheal tubes by paramedics in an urban emergency medical services system. Ann Emerg Med 2001; 37: 62–4

2. Konrad C, Schüpfer G, Wietlisbach M, Gerber H: Learning manual skills in anesthesiology: Is there a recommended number of cases for anesthetic procedures? Anesth Analg 1998; 86: 635–9

3. Knill RL: Difficult laryngoscopy made easy with a “BURP.” Can J Anaesth 1993; 40: 279–82

4. Heagerty PJ: Marginally specified logistic-normal models for longitudinal binary data. Biometrics 1999; 55: 688–98

5. Latto IP: Management of difficult intubation, Difficulties in Tracheal Intubation. Edited by Latto IP, Rosen M. London, Bailliere Tindall, 1987, pp 99–141

6. Adnet F, Borron S, Dumas JL, Lapostolle F, Cupa M, Lapandry C: Study of the “sniffing position” by magnetic resonance imaging. A nesthesiology 2001; 94: 83–6

7. Adnet F, Baillard C, Borron SW: Randomized study comparing the “sniffing position” with simple head extension for laryngoscopic view in elective surgery patients. A nesthesiology 2001; 95: 836–41

8. Rubens AJ: Testing airway management skills: interactive video courseware vs ACLS instructor. Respir Care 1991; 36: 849–56

9. Naik VN, Matsumoto ED, Houston PL, Hamstra SJ, Yeung RY, Mallon JS, Martire TM: Fiberoptic orotracheal intubation on anesthetized patients: Do manipulation skills learned on a simple model transfer into the operating room? A nesthesiology 2001; 95: 343–8

10. March JA, Farrow JL, Brown LH, Dunn KA, Perkins PK: A breathing manikin model for teaching nasotracheal intubation to EMS professionals. Prehosp Emerg Care 1997; 1: 269–72

Cited By:

This article has been cited 72 time(s).

Annals of Emergency Medicine
The Spectrum and Frequency of Critical Procedures Performed in a Pediatric Emergency Department: Implications of a Provider-Level View
Mittiga, MR; Geis, GL; Kerrey, BT; Rinderknecht, AS
Annals of Emergency Medicine, 61(3): 263-270.
10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.06.021
CrossRef
Journal of Anesthesia
Comparing intubation performance of video and direct laryngoscopes
Meng, FM; Zhang, JQ; Xue, FS
Journal of Anesthesia, 27(3): 472-473.
10.1007/s00540-012-1534-z
CrossRef
Pediatrics
A Randomized Trial of Stylets for Intubating Newborn Infants
Kamlin, COF; O'Connell, LAF; Morley, CJ; Dawson, JA; Donath, SM; O'Donnell, CPF; Davis, PG
Pediatrics, 131(1): E198-E205.
10.1542/peds.2012-0802
CrossRef
Annales Francaises D Anesthesie Et De Reanimation
Impact of Cormack and Lehane's grade on intubating laryngeal mask airway Fastrach (TM) using: a study in gynaecological surgery
Roblot, C; Ferrandiere, M; Bierlaire, D; Fusciardi, J; Mercier, C; Laffon, M
Annales Francaises D Anesthesie Et De Reanimation, 24(5): 487-491.
10.1016/j.annfar.2005.02.017
CrossRef
Anaesthesia and Intensive Care
The acquisition of airway skills by new trainee anaesthetists
Weller, J; Segal, R
Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, 36(4): 487-488.

Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America
Tracheal Intubation: Tricks of the Trade
Murphy, MF; Hung, OR; Law, JA
Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America, 26(4): 1001-+.
10.1016/j.emc.2008.07.009
CrossRef
Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie
Early clinical experience with a new videolaryngoscope (GlideScope (R)) in 728 patients
Cooper, RM; Pacey, JA; Bishop, MJ; McCluskey, SA
Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie, 52(2): 191-198.

Anaesthesia
Evaluation of intubation using the Airtraq (R) or Macintosh laryngoscope by anaesthetists in easy and simulated difficult laryngoscopy - a manikin study
Maharaj, CH; Higgins, BD; Harte, BH; Laffey, JG
Anaesthesia, 61(5): 469-477.
10.1111/j.1365-2044.2006.04547.x
CrossRef
Journal of Perinatology
Failure of pediatric and neonatal trainees to meet Canadian Neonatal Resuscitation Program standards for neonatal intubation
Bismilla, Z; Finan, E; McNamara, PJ; LeBlanc, V; Jefferies, A; Whyte, H
Journal of Perinatology, 30(3): 182-187.
10.1038/jp.2009.152
CrossRef
Academic Emergency Medicine
Human patient simulation is effective for teaching paramedic students endotracheal intubation
Hall, RE; Plant, JR; Bands, CJ; Wall, AR; Kang, J; Hall, CA
Academic Emergency Medicine, 12(9): 850-855.
10.1197/j.aem.2005.04.007
CrossRef
Annales Francaises D Anesthesie Et De Reanimation
Difficult airway; teaching strategies and techniques - Question 7
Fischler, M; Bourgain, JL; Chastre, J; Bally, B; Ravussin, P; Richard, M
Annales Francaises D Anesthesie Et De Reanimation, 27(1): 54-62.
10.1016/j.annfar.2007.10.027
CrossRef
Emergency Medicine Journal
Cuffed oropharyngeal airway (COPA) placement is delayed by wearing antichemical protective gear
Ben-Abraham, R; Flaishon, R; Sotman, A; Ezri, T; Weissenberg, M; Weinbroum, AA
Emergency Medicine Journal, 25(): 847-850.
10.1136/emj.2008.059683
CrossRef
Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie
Innovations in anesthesia education: the development and implementation of a resident rotation for advanced airway management
Crosby, E; Lane, A
Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie, 56(): 939-959.
10.1007/s12630-009-9197-4
CrossRef
Journal of Clinical Anesthesia
Case report of the one-armed anesthesiology resident
Elder, J; Waisel, DB
Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, 16(6): 445-448.
10.1016/j.jclinane.2004.07.004
CrossRef
British Journal of Anaesthesia
Video-assisted instruction improves the success rate for tracheal intubation by novices
Howard-Quijano, KJ; Huang, YM; Matevosian, R; Kaplan, MB; Steadman, RH
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 101(4): 568-572.
10.1093/bja/aen211
CrossRef
Journal of Pediatrics
A National Survey of Pediatric Residents and Delivery Room Training Experience
Lee, HC; Chitkara, R; Halamek, LP; Hintz, SR
Journal of Pediatrics, 157(1): 158-U211.
10.1016/j.jpeds.2010.01.029
CrossRef
Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie
Acute airway management in the emergency department by non-anesthesiologists
Kovacs, G; Law, JA; Ross, J; Tallon, J; MacQuarrie, K; Petrie, D; Campbell, S; Soder, C
Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie, 51(2): 174-180.

Journal of Pediatrics
Neonatal intubation: Success of pediatric trainees
Leone, TA; Rich, W; Finer, NN
Journal of Pediatrics, 146(5): 638-641.
10.1016/j.jpeds.2005.01.029
CrossRef
American Journal of Perinatology
Changes in Attendance at Deliveries by Pediatric Residents 2000 to 2005
Lee, HC; Rhee, CJ; Sectish, TC; Hintz, SR
American Journal of Perinatology, 26(2): 129-134.
10.1055/s-0028-1091395
CrossRef
Prehospital Emergency Care
Paramedic Training for Proficient Prehospital Endotracheal Intubation
Warner, KJ; Carlbom, D; Cooke, CR; Bulger, EM; Copass, MK; Sharar, SR
Prehospital Emergency Care, 14(1): 103-108.
10.3109/10903120903144858
CrossRef
Anaesthesia and Intensive Care
Small simulators for teaching procedural skills in a Difficult Airway Algorithm
Parry, K; Owen, H
Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, 32(3): 401-409.

Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Evaluation of the Airway Scope, a new video laryngoscope, in tracheal intubation by naive operators: a manikin study
Miki, T; Inagawa, G; Kikuchi, T; Koyama, Y; Goto, T
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 51(): 1378-1381.
10.1111/j.1399-6576.2007.01450.x
CrossRef
Resuscitation
Students insert the laryngeal tube quicker and more often successful than the esophageal-tracheal combitube in a manikin
Huter, L; Schwarzkopf, K; Rodiger, J; Preussler, NP; Schreiber, T
Resuscitation, 80(8): 930-934.
10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.04.038
CrossRef
Anaesthesia
Retention of tracheal intubation skills by novice personnel: a comparison of the Airtraq (R) and Macintosh laryngoscopes
Maharaj, CH; Costello, J; Higgins, BD; Harte, BH; Laffey, JG
Anaesthesia, 62(3): 272-278.
10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.04938.x
CrossRef
Anaesthesist
Out-of-hospital airway management in northern Germany. Physician-specific knowledge, procedures and equipment
Timmermann, A; Braun, U; Panzer, W; Schlaeger, M; Schnitzker, M; Graf, BM
Anaesthesist, 56(4): 328-334.
10.1007/s00101-007-1153-5
CrossRef
Anaesthesia
A comparison of McGrath and Macintosh laryngoscopes in novice users: a manikin study
Ray, DC; Billington, C; Kearns, PK; Kirkbride, R; Mackintosh, K; Reeve, CS; Robinson, N; Stewart, CJ; Trudeau, T
Anaesthesia, 64(): 1207-1210.
10.1111/j.1365-2044.2009.06061.x
CrossRef
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine
Comparison of tracheal intubation and alternative airway techniques performed in the prehospital setting by paramedics: a systematic review
Jensen, JL; Cheung, KW; Tallon, JM; Travers, AH
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine, 12(2): 135-140.

American Journal of Emergency Medicine
Tracheal intubation by inexperienced medical residents using the Airtraq and Macintosh laryngoscopes - a manikin study
Maharaj, CH; Chonghaile, MN; Higgins, BD; Harte, BH; Laffey, JG
American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 24(7): 769-774.
10.1016/j.ajem.2006.03.014
CrossRef
Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie
A comparison of the Glidescope (R), Pentax AWS (R), and Macintosh laryngoscopes when used by novice personnel: a manikin study
Malik, MA; Hassett, P; Carney, J; Higgins, BD; Harte, BH; Laffey, JG
Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie, 56(): 802-811.
10.1007/s12630-009-9165-z
CrossRef
Critical Care Clinics
Critical Care Issues in Oncological Surgery Patients
Ahmed, S; Oropello, JM
Critical Care Clinics, 26(1): 93-+.
10.1016/j.ccc.2009.10.004
CrossRef
European Journal of Anaesthesiology
Tracheal intubation without muscle relaxants: large doses of opioids, small endotracheal tubes - Reply
Baillard, C; Samama, CM
European Journal of Anaesthesiology, 23(8): 713-714.

Annals Academy of Medicine Singapore
The impact of experiential learning on NUS medical students: Our experience with task trainers and human-patient simulation
Ti, LK; Tan, GM; Khoo, SGMY; Chen, FG
Annals Academy of Medicine Singapore, 35(9): 619-623.

Emergency Medicine Journal
Intubation training in emergency medicine: a review of one trainee's first 100 procedures
Reed, MJ
Emergency Medicine Journal, 24(9): 654-656.
10.1136/emj.2007.048678
CrossRef
Anaesthesia and Intensive Care
Anaesthesia trainees' exposure to airway management in an Australian tertiary adult teaching hospital
Clarke, RC; Gardner, AI
Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, 36(4): 513-515.

Academic Emergency Medicine
Paramedic Self-efficacy and Skill Retention in Pediatric Airway Management
Youngquist, ST; Henderson, DP; Gausche-Hill, M; Goodrich, SM; Poore, PD; Lewis, RJ
Academic Emergency Medicine, 15(): 1295-1303.
10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00262.x
CrossRef
Prehospital Emergency Care
Comparison of Use of the the Airtraq with Direct Laryngoscopy by Paramedics in the Simulated Airway
Nowicki, T; Suozzi, J; Dziedzic, M; Kamin, R; Donahue, S; Robinson, K
Prehospital Emergency Care, 13(1): 75-80.
10.1080/10903120802471881
CrossRef
Pediatric Anesthesia
A comparison of the STORZ video laryngoscope and standard direct laryngoscopy for intubation in the Pediatric airway - a randomized clinical trial
Vlatten, A; Aucoin, S; Litz, S; Macmanus, B; Soder, C
Pediatric Anesthesia, 19(): 1102-1107.
10.1111/j.1460-9592.2009.03127.x
CrossRef
Pediatric Anesthesia
Psoas compartment block (PCB) in children: Part II - generation of an institutional learning curve with a new technique
Schuepfer, G; Johr, M
Pediatric Anesthesia, 15(6): 465-469.
10.1111/j.1460-9592.2005.01615.x
CrossRef
Annals of Emergency Medicine
Out-of-hospital endotracheal intubation: Where are we?
Wang, HE; Yealy, DM
Annals of Emergency Medicine, 47(6): 532-541.
10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.01.016
CrossRef
Anaesthesia
Tracheal intubation and alternative airway management devices used by healthcare professionals with different level of pre-existing skills: a manikin study
Wahlen, BM; Roewer, N; Lange, M; Kranke, P
Anaesthesia, 64(5): 549-554.
10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05812.x
CrossRef
Respiratory Care
The mystique of direct laryngoscopy
Levitan, RM
Respiratory Care, 52(1): 21-23.

Clinics in Perinatology
Delivery Room Intervention: Improving the Outcome
Rich, WD; Leone, T; Finer, NN
Clinics in Perinatology, 37(1): 189-+.
10.1016/j.clp.2010.01.011
CrossRef
Anaesthesia, Pain, Intensive Care and Emergency: A.P.I.C.E
Out-of-hospital airway management: Knowledge and equipment
Russo, S; Eich, C; Timmermann, A
Anaesthesia, Pain, Intensive Care and Emergency: A.P.I.C.E, (): 71-79.

Anaesthesia
Tracheal intubation following training with the GlideScope (R) compared to direct laryngoscopy
Ayoub, CM; Kanazi, GE; Al Alami, A; Rameh, C; El-Khatib, MF
Anaesthesia, 65(7): 674-678.
10.1111/j.1365-2044.2010.06335.x
CrossRef
Anaesthesia
Learning and performance of tracheal intubation by novice personnel: a comparison of the Airtraq (R) and Macintosh laryngoscope
Maharaj, CH; Costello, JF; Higgins, BD; Harte, BH; Laffey, JG
Anaesthesia, 61(7): 671-677.
10.1111/j.1365-2044.2006.04653.x
CrossRef
Resuscitation
Laryngoscopic versus intubating LMA guided tracheae intubation by novice users - A manikin study
Timmermann, A; Russo, SG; Crozier, TA; Nickel, EA; Kazmaier, S; Eich, C; Graf, BM
Resuscitation, 73(3): 412-416.
10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.10.019
CrossRef
Annales Francaises D Anesthesie Et De Reanimation
National survey on out-of-hospital difficult intubation management
Rusan, M; Sende, J; Dhonneur, G; Jabre, P; Chollet-Xemard, C; Margenet, A; Marty, J; Combes, X
Annales Francaises D Anesthesie Et De Reanimation, 28(4): 302-306.
10.1016/j.annfar.2009.01.015
CrossRef
Anaesthesia
A comparison of direct and indirect laryngoscopes and the ILMA in novice users: a manikin study
Maharaj, CH; McDonnell, JG; Harte, BH; Laffey, JG
Anaesthesia, 62(): 1161-1166.
10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05216.x
CrossRef
Medical Education
Experiential learning improves the learning and retention of endotracheal intubation
Ti, LK; Chen, FG; Tan, GM; Tan, WT; Tan, JMJ; Shen, L; Goy, RWL
Medical Education, 43(7): 654-660.
10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03399.x
CrossRef
Anaesthesist
Extraglottic airway devices in the intensive care unit
Russo, SG; Moerer, O; Nickel, EA; Goetze, B; Timmermann, A; Quintel, M
Anaesthesist, 59(6): 555-563.
10.1007/s00101-010-1728-4
CrossRef
British Journal of Anaesthesia
A Scottish National Prospective Study of airway management skills in new-start SHOs
Whymark, C; Moores, A; MacLeod, AD
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 97(4): 473-475.
10.1093/bja/ael190
CrossRef
Chest
Counterpoint: Should an Anesthesiologist Be the Specialist of Choice in Managing the Difficult Airway in the ICU? Not Necessarily
Doerschug, KC
Chest, 142(6): 1375-1377.
10.1378/chest.12-2196
CrossRef
Pediatrics
Level of Trainee and Tracheal Intubation Outcomes
Sanders, RC; Giuliano, JS; Sullivan, JE; Brown, CA; Walls, RM; Nadkarni, V; Nishisaki, A
Pediatrics, 131(3): E821-E828.
10.1542/peds.2012-2127
CrossRef
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation & Emergency Medicine
Evaluation of airway management associated hands-off time during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomised manikin follow-up study
Gruber, C; Nabecker, S; Wohlfarth, P; Ruetzler, A; Roth, D; Kimberger, O; Fischer, H; Frass, M; Ruetzler, K
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation & Emergency Medicine, 21(): -.
ARTN 10
CrossRef
Anaesthesist
Developing the skill of laryngeal mask insertion Prospective single center study
Mohr, S; Weigand, MA; Hofer, S; Martin, E; Gries, A; Walther, A; Bernhard, M
Anaesthesist, 62(6): 447-452.
10.1007/s00101-013-2185-7
CrossRef
Resuscitation
Performance of the i-gel (TM) during pre-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation
Haske, D; Schempf, B; Gaier, G; Niederberger, C
Resuscitation, 84(9): 1229-1232.
10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.04.025
CrossRef
American Journal of Emergency Medicine
Comparison of 3 video laryngoscopes with the Macintosh in a manikin with easy and difficult simulated airways
Wang, PK; Huang, CC; Lee, Y; Chen, TY; Lai, HY
American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 31(2): 330-338.
10.1016/j.ajem.2012.08.026
CrossRef
Minerva Anestesiologica
Performance of indirect and direct laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation in suspected difficult airways
Meng, FM; Zhang, JQ; Chang, EQ; Xue, FS
Minerva Anestesiologica, 79(4): 445-446.

Medical Teacher
Validation and piloting of direct observation of practical skills tool to assess intubation in the Chilean context
Delfino, AE; Chandratilake, M; Altermatt, FR; Echevarria, G
Medical Teacher, 35(3): 231-236.
10.3109/0142159X.2012.737967
CrossRef
Acta Clinica Croatica
Airway Management in the Intensive Care Unit
Noppens, RR
Acta Clinica Croatica, 51(3): 511-517.

Emergency Medicine Australasia
Prospective observational study of the practice of endotracheal intubation in the emergency department of a tertiary hospital in Sydney, Australia
Fogg, T; Annesley, N; Hitos, K; Vassiliadis, J
Emergency Medicine Australasia, 24(6): 617-624.
10.1111/1742-6723.12005
CrossRef
Chest
Staffing in ICUs Physicians and Alternative Staffing Models
Garland, A; Gershengorn, HB
Chest, 143(1): 214-221.
10.1378/chest.12-1531
CrossRef
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Pre-hospital airway management by non-physicians in Northern Finland - a cross-sectional survey
Raatiniemi, L; Lankimaki, S; Martikainen, M
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 57(5): 654-659.
10.1111/aas.12101
CrossRef
Emergency Medicine Journal
Utility of the Pentax-AWS in performing tracheal intubation while wearing chemical, biological, radiation and nuclear personal protective equipment: a randomised crossover trial using a manikin
Shin, DH; Choi, PC; Na, JU; Cho, JH; Han, SK
Emergency Medicine Journal, 30(7): 527-531.
10.1136/emermed-2012-201463
CrossRef
Anesthesiology
Success Rate of Orotracheal Intubation via GlideScope® versus Direct Laryngoscopy in Manikin-Only–Trained Medical Personnel
Nouruzi-Sedeh, P; Schumann, M; Groeben, H
Anesthesiology, 111(2): 447.
10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181acfcf7
PDF (70) | CrossRef
Anesthesiology
Laryngoscopy via Macintosh Blade versus GlideScope: Success Rate and Time for Endotracheal Intubation in Untrained Medical Personnel
Nouruzi-Sedeh, P; Schumann, M; Groeben, H
Anesthesiology, 110(1): 32-37.
10.1097/ALN.0b013e318190b6a7
PDF (916) | CrossRef
Anesthesiology
Novices Ventilate and Intubate Quicker and Safer via Intubating Laryngeal Mask Than by Conventional Bag–Mask Ventilation and Laryngoscopy
Timmermann, A; Russo, SG; Crozier, TA; Eich, C; Mundt, B; Albrecht, B; Graf, BM
Anesthesiology, 107(4): 570-576.
10.1097/01.anes.0000281940.92807.23
PDF (354) | CrossRef
Anesthesiology
Effects of Supervision by Attending Anesthesiologists on Complications of Emergency Tracheal Intubation
Schmidt, UH; Kumwilaisak, K; Bittner, E; George, E; Hess, D
Anesthesiology, 109(6): 973-977.
10.1097/ALN.0b013e31818ddb90
PDF (183) | CrossRef
Anesthesiology
Success Rate of Orotracheal Intubation via GlideScope® versus Direct Laryngoscopy in Manikin-Only–Trained Medical Personnel
Dupanovic, M
Anesthesiology, 111(2): 446.
10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181acf988
PDF (73) | CrossRef
Current Opinion in Anesthesiology
Paramedic versus emergency physician emergency medical service: role of the anaesthesiologist and the European versus the Anglo-American concept
Timmermann, A; Russo, SG; Hollmann, MW
Current Opinion in Anesthesiology, 21(2): 222-227.
10.1097/ACO.0b013e3282f5f4f7
PDF (107) | CrossRef
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
Using Pediatric Advanced Life Support in pediatric residency training: Does the curriculum need resuscitation?*
Grant, EC; Marczinski, CA; Menon, K
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, 8(5): 433-439.
10.1097/01.PCC.0000282044.78432.0B
PDF (314) | CrossRef
Pediatric Emergency Care
Tracheal Intubation Practice and Maintaining Skill Competency: Survey of Pediatric Emergency Department Medical Directors
Losek, JD; Olson, LR; Dobson, JV; Glaeser, PW
Pediatric Emergency Care, 24(5): 294-299.
10.1097/PEC.0b013e31816ecbd4
PDF (96) | CrossRef
Back to Top | Article Outline

© 2003 American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc.

Publication of an advertisement in Anesthesiology Online does not constitute endorsement by the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc. or Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. of the product or service being advertised.
Login

Article Tools

Images

Share