BODY position influences respiratory mechanics and breathing patterns. Beneficial effects of lateral position on maintenance of pharyngeal airway are far obvious to spouses who recognize that their husbands snore less while on their sides during sleep. In fact, obstructive respiratory events during sleep were reported to be fewer with the lateral position than the supine position in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). 1–5
Lateral position is recommended to be a preferable position for improving obstruction at the pharyngeal airway in these patients during sleep, suggesting usefulness of positional therapy even for pharyngeal obstruction during the perioperative period. However, little information is available regarding the mechanisms of the improvement and the precise pharyngeal site influenced by the lateral position.
The current concept of maintenance of pharyngeal airway suggests that interaction between intrinsic mechanical properties of the pharynx (anatomic mechanisms) and neural regulation of pharyngeal dilator muscle activities (neural mechanisms) determines the size of the pharynx. 6
Therefore, the improvement of the pharyngeal maintenance by the lateral position could be either structural alteration or increase in the pharyngeal dilator muscle activities. In this context, Boudewyns et al.7
clearly demonstrated reduction of upper airway collapsibility during suppression of the upper airway muscle activities, indicating involvement of the anatomic mechanism. However, we still lack knowledge on structural changes within each pharyngeal segment by the lateral position. As reported previously, we developed a method for evaluation of anatomic properties of each pharyngeal segment independently of the neural mechanisms. 8–10
The neural mechanisms are completely eliminated by producing total muscle paralysis with general anesthesia. During such circumstances, the anatomic properties of the atonic pharynx can be assessed by measuring cross-sectional area at various airway pressures (PAW
) during conditions of no respiratory airflow. The static mechanics of the passive pharyngeal segment is graphically best expressed by a pressure–area relation plot, which exhibits the maximum area, the pressure at which the area is zero (closing pressure [P′close
]), and the passive pharyngeal compliance. Structural changes by the lateral position are demonstrated as changes of the static pressure–area relation. Accordingly, the purpose of this study was to assess effectiveness of the lateral position in improving structural properties of each pharyngeal segment while eliminating neuromuscular factors in patients with OSA.
Materials and Methods
Subjects and Overnight Oximetry
We studied eight male patients with OSA who were interested in undergoing uvulopalatopharyngoplasty as a treatment for their OSA and were scheduled to have endoscopic assessment of their pharyngeal mechanics to determine whether they were favorable candidates for this procedure. All had histories of excessive daytime sleepiness, habitual snoring, and witnessed repetitive apnea. Sleep disordered breathing (SDB) was evaluated by a pulse oximeter (Pulsox-5; Minolta, Tokyo, Japan) at home. All subjects were instructed to attach an oximetry finger probe before sleep and to remove the probe on awakening. Digital readings of arterial oxygen saturation (Spo2
) and pulse rate were stored every 5 s in a memory card. The stored data were displayed on a computer screen to check quality of the recordings. The computer calculated oxygen desaturation index, defined as the number of oxygen desaturation exceeding 4% from the baseline, and the percent of time spent at Spo2
less than 90%. Although the oximetry evaluation alone does not clarify the nature of SDB, we believe that all patients can be safely diagnosed as having OSA based on the oximetry results and the clinical symptoms. 11
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects after the aim and potential risks of the study were fully explained to each. The investigation was approved by the Hospital Ethics Committee.
Preparation of the Subjects
Each subject was initially premedicated with 0.5 mg atropine. Studies were performed with the subjects in a supine position on an operating table, with the neck in a comfortable neutral position. A modified tight-fitting nasal mask was used. Care was taken to prevent from air leaks from the mask, particularly when the airway was pressurized above 20 cm H2O. Use of a chin strap maintained contact of the upper and lower incisors and eliminated air leaks through the mouth. The air leaks through the mask and mouth were detected by inadequate increase in the PAW and feeling them by hand. General anesthesia was induced by intravenous administration of thiopental sodium (4 mg/kg). Intravenous administration of muscle relaxant (0.2 mg/kg vecuronium) achieved complete paralysis throughout the experiment. Anesthesia was maintained by inhalation of sevoflurane (2–4%) while the subject was ventilated through the nasal mask with positive pressure using an anesthetic machine. Spo2, electrocardiogram, and blood pressure were continuously monitored. A slim endoscope (FB10X; Pentax, Tokyo, Japan; 3-mm OD) was inserted through the modified nasal mask and the naris. The tip of the scope was placed at the upper airway to visualize the retropalatal airway space (airway space behind the soft palate) and the retroglossal airway space (airway space behind the base of the tongue). A closed-circuit camera (ETV8; Nisco, Saitama, Japan) was connected to the endoscope, and the pharyngeal images were recorded on a videotape. Reading of PAW, measured by a water manometer, was simultaneously recorded on the videotape.
To determine the pressure–area relation of the pharynx, the anesthetic machine was disconnected from the nasal mask. The latter was in turn connected to a pressure-control system capable of accurately manipulating PAW from −20 to 20 cm H2O in a stepwise fashion. Cessation of mechanical ventilation resulted in apnea caused by complete muscle paralysis. PAW was immediately increased up to 20 cm H2O, dilating the airway. While the subject remained apneic for 2–3 min, PAW was gradually reduced from 20 cm H2O to a P′close of the retropalatal airway in a stepwise fashion. The latter represented the pressure at which complete closure of the retropalatal airway occurred, as evident on the video screen. In this experimental setting, the retroglossal PAW was not reduced below the retropalatal PAW. Spo2 was maintained above 95% during the apneic tests. This procedure of experimentally induced apnea allowed construction of the pressure–area relation of the visualized pharyngeal segment. The subject was manually ventilated for at least 1 min before and after the apneic test. Distance between the tip of the endoscope and the narrowing site was measured with a wire passed through the aspiration channel of the endoscope. Measurements were made for the retropalatal and retroglossal airways with patients in the supine and left lateral positions. Care was taken to maintain the neutral neck position throughout the procedure, particularly when the patient was in the lateral position while we did not measure the head angle. In the left lateral position, the down-side knee was bent to retain the legs on the table, improving stabilization of the position. The upside leg was bent to the lesser extent, and additional pillows supported the head so that the trunk and head were aligned. The elbows were flexed, and both arms were placed on the table in front of the patient's face.
To convert the monitor image to an absolute value of cross-sectional area of the pharynx, magnification of the imaging system was estimated at 1.0-mm interval distances between the endoscopic tip and the object in range of 5–30 mm. At a defined value of PAW, the image of the pharyngeal lumen was traced and counted pixels included in the area (SigmaScan version 2.0; Jandel Scientific Software, San Rafael, CA). The pixel number was converted to pharyngeal cross-sectional area according to the distance–magnification relation. Using known-diameter tubes, we tested the accuracy of our cross-sectional area measurements. For a constant distance, the measured areas were systematically deviated from actual areas. The largest known area tested (0.95 cm2) was underestimated by 11% because of image deformation at outer image area, and the smallest known area tested (0.03 cm2) was overestimated by 13% because of reduction of the image resolution.
The measured luminal cross-sectional area was plotted as a function of PAW
. We defined P′close
as the pressure corresponding to the zero area. At high values of PAW
, relatively constant cross-sectional areas were revealed; therefore, maximum area (Amax
) was determined as the mean value of highest three PAW
(18, 19, and 20 cm H2
O). As reported previously, 8–10
the pressure–area relation of each pharyngeal segment was fitted by the following exponential function:MATH
where B and K are constants. A nonlinear least-square technique was used for the curve fitting, and the quality of the fitting was provided by coefficient R2
(SigmaPlot version 2.0; Jandel Scientific Software). A regressional estimate of P′close
, which corresponds to an intercept of the curve on the PAW
axis, was calculated from the following MATH
for each pharyngeal segment: The shape of the pressure–area relation was described by the value of K. When the pressure–area relation is curvilinear, compliance of the pharynx defined as a slope of the curve varies with changes in PAW
. Therefore, a single value of compliance calculated for a given PAW
does not represent collapsibility of the pharynx for entire ranges of PAW
. By contrast, the K value represents a rate of changes in the slope of the curve. When the K value is high, small reduction of PAW
results in significant increase in compliance, leading to remarkable reduction in cross-sectional area. Accordingly, collapsibility of the pharynx increases with increasing K value. We suggest that both P’close
and K values represent collapsibility of the pharynx, whereby the former determines the position of the exponential curve and the latter characterizes the shape of the curve.
All values are expressed by median (10–90 percentiles). Wilcoxon signed rank test was used for comparison of the supine and lateral positions. Spearman rank order test was performed for correlation analyses between P’close difference between the positions and anthropometric and oximetry data. P < 0.05 was considered significant.
Endoscopic measurements of static pressure–area relations of the retropalatal and retroglossal airways were successfully performed in both the supine and lateral positions in all patients. As listed in table 1
, anthropometric characteristics and nocturnal oximetry data varied among the patients. Median values of these variables indicate that they were middle-aged, nonobese patients with moderate SDB.
shows representative pressure–area relations of the pharynx in one patient, clearly demonstrating that the pressure–area curves of both pharyngeal sites while in the lateral position are located above those while in the supine position, with larger Amax
and smaller P’close
while in the lateral position.
summarizes changes in the static mechanic variables of the retropalatal and retroglossal airways of patients while in the supine and lateral positions. As indicated by relatively high R2
values, the exponential function fitted reasonably well the measured pressure–area relations. Change from the supine to the lateral position significantly increased median Amax
from 1.30 cm2
to 2.39 cm2
at the retropalatal airway and from 3.70 cm2
to 5.83 cm2
at the retroglossal airway. The position change significantly decreased median P’close
from 2.05 cm H2
O to −1.86 cm H2
O at the retropalatal airway and from 0.49 cm H2
O to −3.17 cm H2
O at the retroglossal airway. While K values representing stiffness of the pharyngeal airway wall tended to decrease while the patient was in the lateral position, the difference was not statistically significant between the positions.
Closing pressure of the retropalatal airway was higher than that of the retroglossal airway in six patients in the supine position, and seven patients had higher P’close
at the retropalatal airway than the retroglossal airway while in the lateral position. While the highest P’close
within the pharynx was above atmospheric pressure in seven patients in the supine position, it remained above atmospheric pressure in two patients in the lateral position (fig. 2
). The positional improvement of P’close
values did not differ between the retropalatal airway (2.9 [−0.3 to 6.2) cm H2
O) and the retroglossal airway (3.3 [1.0–7.0] cm H2
O). The degree of the positional improvement of P’close
values and absolute P’close
values while patients were in the lateral position at both segments was not statistically correlated with age, body mass index, and severity of nocturnal desaturation.
We found that the position change from the supine to the lateral enlarged both retropalatal and retroglossal airways and decreased P’close at both sites by approximately 3 cm H2O on average in completely paralyzed and anesthetized patients with OSA. The results clearly demonstrate that anatomic properties of the passive pharynx improve while patients are in the lateral position.
first assessed the effects of the lateral position on breathing during sleep using polysomnogram. He found that the number of obstructive events during sleep was twice as high during the supine position than the lateral position in 24 patients with OSA, and five of them decreased it less than 5 h−1
. Although Cartwright did not differentiate non–rapid-eye-movement and rapid-eye-movement sleep, Pevernagie and Shepard 2
demonstrated that the positional effects were lost during rapid-eye-movement sleep, 2
possibly reflecting variable contribution of compensatory neural mechanisms to improvement of pharyngeal patency depending on sleep stages. Pevernagie et al.12
further examined the positional effects on upper airway dimensions using computed tomography scan during wakefulness and demonstrated that mean cross-sectional area of the upper airway increased by changing the patient's position from the supine to the lateral even in the nonpositional OSA patient group. Unfortunately, this study was performed without controlling the neural mechanisms during wakefulness, when the upper airway muscles were reported to be actively contracting for compensation of anatomic abnormalities at the pharynx in these apneic patients. 13
Therefore, the observed increase in the area could be either further recruitment of the pharyngeal dilator muscles or structural improvement during the lateral position.
Recently, influences of the lateral position on pharyngeal collapsibility have been evaluated during natural sleep. 7,14,15
Neill et al.14
measured upper airway P’close
by occluding nasal airway in patients in both the supine and lateral positions, but they failed to find significant positional effects on the P’close
By applying Starling resistor concept, Penzel et al.15
reported that critical P’close
of the upper airway decreased by approximately 3 cm H2
O in OSA patients in the lateral position compared with the supine position in all sleep stages. While the critical P’close
was obtained without suppressing pharyngeal dilator muscle contraction in the study by Penzel et al.
, the amount of the critical P’close
reduction was similar to that of Boudewyns et al.
who measured the critical P’close
of hypotonic upper airways in OSA patients during sleep. We confirmed the results of Boude-wyns et al.
by measuring the P’close
of the passive pharynx, and first demonstrated that both retropalatal and retroglossal airways responded to the position change. Probably reflecting the condition of the upper airway dilator muscle activities during the collapsibility assessments, the P’close
reported by Boudewyns et al.
and us were significantly greater than those reported by Penzel et al.
in patients in the supine position. However, interestingly, all of these previous studies demonstrated reduction of P’close
by approximately 3 cm H2
O in the lateral position regardless of the condition of the upper airway muscle activities, indicating that the neural mechanisms contribute little to the improvement of pharyngeal patency by the lateral position.
While the mechanisms of the structural improvement of pharyngeal collapsibility are not entirely clear at present, two possible mechanisms are considered. As illustrated in figure 3
, the pharyngeal airway is structurally surrounded by the soft tissues such as the tongue and lateral soft tissue, which are enclosed by the bony structures such as the mandible and the spine. Based on the finding that both obesity and craniofacial abnormalities, such as small mandible, contributed to increased pharyngeal collapsibility in patients with OSA, we recently suggested that the balance between the amount of the soft tissues and the size of the bony enclosure determines the pressure within the soft tissue (Ptissue
For a given PAW
, increase in the Ptissue
results in reduction of the transmural pressure (Ptm
) and therefore narrows pharyngeal airway. When we changed the body position from supine to lateral, the size of the bony enclosure was considered to be constant because we maintained the head and mandibular positions throughout the experiment. Therefore, the observed reduction of the Ptissue
with the patient in the lateral position can be mainly explained by changes in the amount of the soft tissues. As illustrated in figure 3
, the soft tissues are not uniformly distributed within the bony enclosure, indicating that the Ptissue
may axially vary depending on the direction of gravity acting on the soft tissues, since gravity is considered to be one of significant determinants of the Ptissue
This uneven distribution of the Ptissue
may be further altered by the position change from the supine to the lateral, assuming that the attachment forces between the soft tissues and the bony structures do not differ between the positions. The larger mass of the soft tissues, such as the tongue, anteriorly overrides on the pharyngeal airway, producing greater Ptissue
derived from the gravity onto the anterior pharyngeal airway wall while the patient is in the supine position, whereas the relatively smaller amount of the soft tissues locating laterally may produce smaller Ptissue
onto the lateral pharyngeal airway wall while the patient is in the lateral position. Alternatively, difference in lung volume in patients in the supine and lateral positions may explain the improvement of pharyngeal collapsibility during the lateral position, because the lung volume is reported to influence the pharyngeal patency. 18
Functional residual capacity was reported to increase during left lateral position compared with supine position in anesthetized and paralyzed human subjects. 19
Although speculative at present, caudal tracheal displacement resulted from the lung volume increase may decrease pharyngeal collapsibility, as Rowley et al.
The caudal movement of the trachea also possibly leads to shift of the soft tissue volume out of the bony enclosure to submandibular space, resulting in reduction of the Ptissue
. Accordingly, the possibly increased lung volume during the lateral position may partly account for the increase in the pharyngeal area and reduction of the P’close
Patients with OSA are reported to have higher rate of severe respiratory complications associated with upper airway obstruction during anesthesia and sedation or immediately after anesthesia. 21
While our results only apply to this particular group of patients, we believe that the positional treatment may be beneficial, when applicable, in any perioperative patients as far as the amount of the anterior tissue volume within the mandibular enclosure is greater than the lateral tissue volume as discussed above. Considering that one of common respiratory complications during the perioperative period is related to upper airway obstruction even in general population, 22
and that prevalence of the patients who have more than 5 obstructive events per hour with or without daytime sleepiness is 24% and 9% in middle-aged adult male and female populations, respectively, 23
we believe that our study provides clinically useful information applicable to anesthesia practice in the general population for development of safer perioperative management.
Our clinical goal is a resolution of pharyngeal obstruction, normalizing the breathing pattern. We previously reported that the P’close
measured in paralyzed and anesthetized persons without SDB was −3.8 cm H2
O at the retropalatal airway and −5.5 cm H2
O at the retroglossal airway on average. 8
While we found significant improvement of the P’close
at both pharyngeal sites in patients in the lateral position, the lateral P’close
of each site appears to be still higher by approximately 2 cm H2
O than that of normal persons, indicating that complete reestablishment of patent airway and normal breathing may not be accomplished by the lateral position. Probably because we did not differentiate SDB events in patients in the supine position from those in the lateral position, we failed to find a significant correlation between the severity of SDB and the lateral P’close
values. It would be reasonable to speculate that the two patients who had a lateral P’close
value greater than atmospheric pressure would not normalize their breathing during sleep, as Boudewyns et al.
clearly demonstrated. 7
Furthermore, mandibular advancement, which is one significant component of the triple airway maneuvers usually performed during mask ventilation on induction of anesthesia, was reported to decrease the P’close
from 1.5 cm H2
O to −8.1 cm H2
O on average in anesthetized and paralyzed patients with OSA, 10
suggesting application of the triple airway maneuvers with the patient in the supine position is preferable to the lateral position on induction of anesthesia. We believe that lateral positioning would be useful in maintaining ventilation, particularly in spontaneously breathing persons who are lightly sedated for minor surgeries or examinations.
In conclusion, lateral position structurally improves maintenance of the passive pharyngeal airway in patients with obstructive sleep apnea and may be a useful treatment technique for less severe upper airway obstruction.
1. Cartwright RD: Effect of sleep position on sleep apnea severity. Sleep 1984; 7: 110–4
2. Pevernagie DA, Shepard JW Jr: Relations between sleep stage, posture and effective nasal CPAP levels in OSA. Sleep 1992; 15: 162–7
3. Phillips BA, Okeson J, Paesani D, Gilmore R: Effect of sleep position on sleep apnea and parafunctional activity. Chest 1986; 90: 424–9
4. George CF, Millar TW, Kryger MH: Sleep apnea and body position during sleep. Sleep 1988; 11: 90–9
5. Itasaka Y, Miyazaki S, Ishikawa K, Togawa K: The influence of sleep position and obesity on sleep apnea. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2000; 54: 340–1
6. Isono S: Upper airway muscle function during sleep, Sleep and Breathing in Children: A Developmental Approach. Edited by Loughlin GM, Marcus CL, Carroll JL. New York, Marcel Dekker, 2000, pp 261–91
7. Boudewyns A, Punjabi N, Van de Heyning PH, De Backer WA, O'Donnell CP, Schneider H, Smith PL, Schwartz AR: Abbreviated method for assessing upper airway function in obstructive sleep apnea. Chest 2000; 118: 1031–41
8. Isono S, Remmers JE, Tanaka A, Sho Y, Sato J, Nishino T: Anatomy of pharynx in patients with obstructive sleep apnea and normal subjects. J Appl Physiol 1997; 82: 1319–26
9. Isono S, Tanaka A, Tagaito Y, Sho Y, Nishino T: Pharyngeal patency in response to advancement of the mandible in obese anesthetized persons. A nesthsiology 1997; 87: 1055–62
10. Isono S, Tanaka A, Sho Y, Konno A, Nishino T: Advancement of the mandible improves velopharyngeal airway patency. J Appl Physiol 1995; 79: 2132–8
11. Gyulay S, Olson LG, Hesley MJ, King MT, Allen KM, Saunders NA: A comparison of clinical assessment and home oximetry in the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea. Am Rev Respir Dis 1993; 147: 50–3
12. Pevernagie DA, Stanton AW, Sheedy PF2nd, Daniels BK, Shepard JW Jr: Effects of body position on the upper airway of patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995; 152: 179–85
13. Mezzanotte WS, Tangel DJ, White DP: Waking genioglossal electromyogram in sleep apnea patients versus normal controls: A neuromuscular compensatory mechanism. J Clin Invest 1992; 89: 1571–9
14. Neill AM, Angus SM, Sajkov D, McEvoy D: Effects of sleep posture on upper airway stability in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997; 155: 1999–204
15. Penzel T, Moller M, Becker HF, Knaack L, Peter JH: Effect of sleep position and sleep stage on the collapsibility of the upper airways in patients with sleep apnea. Sleep 2001; 24: 90–5
16. Watanabe T, Isono S, Tanaka A, Tanzawa H, Nishino T: Contribution of body habitus and craniofacial characteristics to segmental closing pressures of the passive pharynx in patients with sleep disordered breathing. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002; 165: 260–5
17. Elliott AR, Shea SA, Dijk DJ, Wyatt JK, Riel E, Neri DF, Czeisler CA, West JB, Prisk GK: Microgravity reduces sleep-disordered breathing in humans. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001; 164: 478–85
18. Hoffstein V, Zamel N, Phillipson EA: Lung volume dependence of pharyngeal cross-sectional area in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Am Rev Respir Dis 1984; 130: 175–8
19. Rehder K, Hatch DJ, Sessler AD, Fowler WS: The function of each lung of anesthetized and paralyzed man during mechanical ventilation. A nesthesiology 1972; 37: 16–26
20. Rowley JA, Permutt S, Willey S, Smith PL, Schwartz AR: Effect of tracheal and tongue displacement on upper airway airflow dynamics. J Appl Physiol 1996; 80: 2171–8
21. Esclamado RM, Glenn MG, McCulloch TM, Cummings CW: Perioperative complications and risk factors in the surgical treatment of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Laryngoscope 1989; 99: 1125–9
22. Asai T, Koga K, Vaughan RS: Respiratory complications associated with tracheal intubation and extubation. Br J Anaesth 1998; 80: 767–75
23. Young T, Palta M, Dempsey PM, Skatrud J, Weber S, Badr S: The occurrence of sleep-disordered breathing among middle-aged adults. N Engl J Med 1993; 328: 1230–5
© 2002 American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc.