Skip Navigation LinksHome > January 2002 - Volume 96 - Issue 1 > Developmental Variation in Nitrous Oxide–induced c-Fos Expre...
Anesthesiology:
Laboratory Report

Developmental Variation in Nitrous Oxide–induced c-Fos Expression in Fischer Rat Spinal Cord

Hashimoto, Toshikazu M.D.*; Ohashi, Yoko M.D.*; Nelson, Laura E. B.A.†; Maze, Mervyn M.B., Ch.B., F.R.C.P., F.R.C.A.‡; Fujinaga, Masahiko M.D.§

Free Access
Article Outline
Collapse Box

Author Information

RECENT studies have further clarified the mechanism for the analgesic–antinociceptive action of nitrous oxide (N2O). 1 N2O induces opioid peptide release in the mid brain, which activates descending noradrenergic inhibitory neurons and modulates pain and nociceptive processing in the spinal cord. Activation of descending noradrenergic inhibitory neurons by N2O can be assessed by the induction of c-Fos expression (a protein product of the immediate early gene, c-fos, which is commonly used as an immunohistochemical marker of neuronal activation 2) in the spinal cord in adult rats. 3 Because the descending noradrenergic inhibitory neurons are not yet functional at birth in rats, 4,5 we posit that N2O is not an effective analgesic–antinociceptive agent in newborns. In support of this, we have shown that N2O lacks antinociceptive effect in the tail flick test (thermal stimulation on the tail) in newborn rats. 6 In this report, we show that N2O administration does not induce c-Fos expression in the spinal cord of newborn rats, possibly due to a lack of functional descending noradrenergic inhibitory neurons.
Back to Top | Article Outline

Materials and Methods

Animal and Gas Exposure
Table 1
Table 1
Image Tools
The study protocol of animal experiments was approved by the Home Office of the United Kingdom (London, United Kingdom), and all efforts were made to minimize animal suffering and reduce the number of animals used. Fischer rats 7 of different ages, including adults, were obtained from the breeder (B&K Universal, Grimston Aldbrough Hull, United Kingdom). One- and 2-week-old pups were received from the breeder with their mothers and were kept together until the experiment was initiated. Those pups were randomly divided into two groups without consideration of sex (table 1). (In the previous study, we found no sex difference in response to noxious thermal stimulation or in response to N2O at these age groups. 6) Three- and 4-week-old rats were received without mothers, and only male animals were used for the experiment, as for adults. To estimate more accurately the age of each animal, a growth curve of the body weight was created from 12 pups (7 males and 5 females that were obtained from the timed-pregnant rats that delivered at our facility), and the curve fit was calculated as follows:
Equation U1
Equation U1
Image Tools
MATH
where y = body weight, and x = age by day. The day of birth was defined as 0 days old. The age of each animal was then estimated from the inverted formula (table 1):
Equation U2
Equation U2
Image Tools
MATH
where y = age by day, and x = body weight. The animals were exposed to either air (control group) or 75% N2O–25% O2 (N2O group) for 90 min in an acrylic chamber as described in our previous study. 3
Back to Top | Article Outline
Spinal Cord Preparation and Immunohistochemical Analysis of c-Fos
The spinal cord collection and its cryosection and immunohistochemical analysis are described in detail in our previous study. 3 In brief, animals were injected intraperitoneally with sodium pentobarbital (100 mg/kg) immediately after gas exposure, and the spinal cord was collected after paraformaldehyde perfusion. The spinal cord was cryosectioned at 30 μm, and sections were collected in 0.1-m phosphate-buffered saline as free-floating sections. Sections were incubated with anti-c-Fos antibody (1:10000, catalog No. sc-52-G; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), and the immunohistochemical reaction was visualized using enhanced diaminobenzidine (DAB) reaction (DAB kit; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). Slides were examined for c-Fos–positive cells, which were identified by dense black nuclear staining. For adult animals, the number of c-Fos–positive cells was counted for each area of the spinal cord, i.e., laminae I–II (superficial area), laminae III–IV (nucleus proprius area), laminae V–VI (neck area), and laminae VII–X (ventral area), according to the method described by Presley et al.8 For young animals, such a scheme could not be used because of immature development of the spinal cord. Therefore, a simplified scheme developed by Yi and Barr 9 was used to count the number of c-Fos–positive cells in four different areas of the spinal cord, i.e., A–B, C, D, and E. At least four animals were examined for each group, and the number of c-Fos–positive cells in each area and group was calculated as mean ± SD. An investigator who conducted the counting of c-Fos–positive cells was blinded for experimental groups.
Back to Top | Article Outline
Statistical Analysis
The Mann–Whitney U test was performed on the data for the numbers of c-Fos–positive cells between control and N2O groups at each developmental stage. A P value less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. No attempt was made to compare among different levels of the spinal cord and different age groups.
Back to Top | Article Outline

Results

Table 2
Table 2
Image Tools
Table 3
Table 3
Image Tools
In adult rats, exposure to 75% N2O increased the number of c-Fos–positive cells at all levels of the spinal cord examined, i.e., cervical, thoracic, and lumbar levels, and within all laminae except for laminae I and II (table 2). N2O-induced c-Fos expression was specifically localized within laminae III and VI. In younger rats, two levels of the spinal cord, cervical and lumbar, were examined, which showed similar results (table 3). (Those at the thoracic and sacral levels were too small to be processed.) In 1-week-old animals, there were no differences in the number of c-Fos–positive cells between control and N2O groups, i.e., N2O did not induce c-Fos expression. In 2-, 3-, and 4-week-old animals, the number of c-Fos–positive cells was increased in all areas.
Back to Top | Article Outline

Discussion

Descending inhibitory neurons are essential components of the “endogenous pain-suppression system.”10 Recent studies have indicated that activation of descending noradrenergic inhibitory neurons has a pivotal role in the analgesic–antinociceptive effect of N2O. 1 During development, descending inhibitory neurons extend their axons caudad from the brain stem, reaching the spinal cord during the fetal period. 11 Evidence has shown that these neurons are not functionally mature until a few weeks after birth in rats. For example, immunohistochemical studies have shown that it takes more than 2 weeks after birth for noradrenergic neurons to establish their adult distribution pattern in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord. 12–14 Electrophysiologic studies have also indicated that descending inhibitory neurons become functionally mature approximately 3 weeks after birth. 4,5 In the current study, we have demonstrated that N2O does not induce c-Fos expression in the spinal cord in rats until 2 weeks after birth. This result is consistent with our hypothesis that N2O does not induce c-Fos expression in the spinal cord of newborn rats because of a lack of functionally mature descending noradrenergic inhibitory neurons. It is also in accordance with our previous study indicating that N2O does not induce an antinociceptive response to the tail-flick test in newborn rats. 4
The quantitative difference in c-Fos expression between adult and young animals may be confounded by the different laminar schemes used. In the laminar scheme that we have adopted for young animals, 9 A–B includes adult laminae that both express (lamina III) and do not express (laminae I and II) c-Fos with N2O exposure. In addition, there seems to be a lack of congruity with N2O exposure between our current findings (in which c-Fos expression appears at 2 weeks) and our earlier report (in which antinociceptive effect on tail-flick test only appears at 4 weeks 6). However, these can be reconciled by the fact that although activation (and hence c-Fos expression) of γ-aminobutyric acid–mediated (GABAergic) interneurons is required, 3 it is not sufficient to produce antinociceptive effect with N2O exposure. Therefore, other downstream consequences of GABA release may still be immature and nonfunctional, including signaling through the GABAA receptor. 15 Furthermore, the sacral elements are involved in the tail-flick latency paradigm, and this region of the spinal cord was not examined in this study for technical reasons.
In summary, we have demonstrated that N2O administration induces c-Fos expression in the spinal cord of the adult rat; this expression is deficient in newborn rats and appears only 2 weeks after birth. These findings are consistent with our hypothesis that a lack of functional descending noradrenergic inhibitory neurons precludes both the induction of c-Fos expression and the antinociceptive effect during N2O exposure in newborn rats.
Back to Top | Article Outline

References

1. Maze M, Fujinaga M: Recent advances in understanding the actions and toxicity of nitrous oxide. Anaesthesia 2000; 55: 311–4

2. Harris JA: Using c-fos as a neural marker of pain. Brain Res Bull 1998; 45: 1–8

3. Hashimoto T, Maze M, Ohashi Y, Fujinaga M: Nitrous oxide activates GABAergic neurons in the spinal cord in Fischer rat. A nesthesiology 2001; 95: 463–9

4. Fitzgerald M, Koltzenburg M: The functional development of descending inhibitory pathways in the dorsolateral funiculus of the newborn rat spinal cord. Brain Res 1986; 389: 261–70

5. van Praag H, Frenk H: The development of stimulation-produced analgesia (SPA) in the rat. Dev Brain Res 1991; 64: 71–6

6. Fujinaga M, Doone R, Davies MF, Maze M: Nitrous oxide lacks antinociceptive effect on tail flick test in newborn rats. Anesth Analg 2000; 91: 6–10

7. Fender C, Fujinaga M, Maze M: Strain differences in antinociceptive effect of nitrous oxide on tail flick test in rats. Anesth Analg 2000; 90: 195–9

8. Presley RW, Menétrey D, Levine JD, Basbaum AI: Systemic morphine suppresses noxious stimulus-evoked Fos protein-like immunoreactivity in the rat spinal cord. J Neurosci 1990; 10: 323–35

9. Yi DK, Barr GA: The induction of Fos-like immunoreactivity by noxious thermal, mechanical and chemical stimuli in the lumbar spinal cord of infant rats. Pain 1995; 60: 257–65

10. Basbaum AL, Fields HL: Endogenous pain control mechanisms: Review and hypothesis. Ann Neurol 1978; 4: 451–62

11. Leong SK, Shieh JY, Wong WC: Localizing spinal cord projecting neurons in neonatal and immature albino rats. J Comp Neurol 1984; 228: 18–23

12. Commissiong JW: Development of catecholaminergic nerves in the spinal cord of the rat. Brain Res 1983; 264: 197–208

13. Aramant RB, Giron LT Jr, Ziegler MG: Postnatal development of dopamine-β-hydroxylase-immunoreactive fibers of the spinal cord of the rat. Dev Brain Res 1986; 25: 161–71

14. Rajaofetra N, Poulat P, Marlier L, Geffard M, Privat A: Pre- and postnatal development of noradrenergic projections to the rat spinal cord: An immunocytochemical study. Brain Res Dev Brain Res 1992; 67: 237–46

15. Rivera C, Voipio J, Payne JA, Ruusuvuori E, Lahtinen H, Lamsa K, Pirvola U, Saarma M, Kaila K: The K+/Cl co-transporter KCC2 renders GABA hyperpolarizing during neuronal maturation. Nature 1999; 397: 251–5

Cited By:

This article has been cited 5 time(s).

Progress in Neurobiology
Fos, nociception and the dorsal horn
Coggeshall, RE
Progress in Neurobiology, 77(5): 299-352.
10.1016/j.pneurobio.2005.11.002
CrossRef
Brain Research
Nitrous oxide-induced c-Fos expression in the rat brain
Kaiyala, KJ; Thiele, TE; Watson, CH; Ramsay, DS
Brain Research, 967(): 73-80.
10.1016/S0006-8993(02)04219-1
CrossRef
Pain
Nitrous oxide exerts age-dependent antinociceptive effects in Fischer rats
Ohashi, Y; Stowell, JM; Nelson, LE; Hashimoto, T; Maze, M; Fujinaga, M
Pain, 100(): 7-18.
PII S0304-3959(02)00098-2
CrossRef
Clinical Therapeutics
Analgesia and anesthesia for neonates: Study design and ethical issues
Anand, KJS; Aranda, JV; Berde, CB; Buckman, S; Capparelli, EV; Carlo, WA; Hummel, P; Lantos, P; Johnston, CC; Lehr, VT; Lynn, AM; Maxwell, LG; Oberlander, TF; Raju, TNK; Soriano, SG; Taddio, A; Walco, GA
Clinical Therapeutics, 27(6): 814-843.
10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.06.021
CrossRef
Molecular Neurobiology
Neurobiology of nitrous oxide-induced antinociceptive effects
Fujinaga, M; Maze, M
Molecular Neurobiology, 25(2): 167-189.

Back to Top | Article Outline

© 2002 American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc.

Publication of an advertisement in Anesthesiology Online does not constitute endorsement by the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc. or Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. of the product or service being advertised.
Login

Article Tools

Images

Share