Skip Navigation LinksHome > February 2001 - Volume 94 - Issue 2 > American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classi...
Anesthesiology:
Correspondence

American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System Is Not a Risk Classification System

Owens, William D. M.D.

Free Access
Article Outline
Collapse Box

Author Information

To the Editor:—
In the article about variability in surgical procedure times published in the May issue of Anesthesiology, 1 I was dismayed to find numerous (15) references to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Classification system as ”ASA risk class,” “ASA values,” and “ASA risk scores.” None of these characterizations of the Physical Status Classification system is appropriate. Drs. Meyer Saklad, 2 Ivan Taylor, and E. A. Rovenstein originally designed the system as a categorization system for statistical studies. They recognized from the beginning that “operative risk” was not an item to be included in the classification system because it is altered by the nature of the surgical procedure. The American Society of Anesthesiologists House of Delegates has modified the system several times in the past 59 yr, but risk was not included in any modification.
Many studies have shown a correlation between mortality and physical status class, but these are only in a surgery-specific analysis. That does not make the system a risk stratification system. The ASA Physical Status system was, and is, a means to stratify a patient’s systemic illness. Certainly, a patient’s inherent protoplasm is a part of systemic illness and indirectly may lead to adverse occurrences. The kind of operative procedure is not a part of the classification system because a physical status III patient is still in that status if scheduled for an excision of a skin lesion with monitored anesthesia care or if scheduled for a pancreatectomy with general anesthesia. The operative risk is different because of the surgery, but the physical condition of the patient is the same preoperatively.
William D. Owens M.D.
Back to Top | Article Outline

References

1. Strum DP, Sampson AR, May JH, Vargas LG: Surgeon and type of anesthesia predict variability in surgical procedure times. A nesthesiology 2000; 92: 1454–66

2. Saklad M: Grading of patients for surgical procedures. A nesthesiology 1941; 2: 281–4

Cited By:

This article has been cited 5 time(s).

Bju International
Does the presence of significant risk factors affect perioperative outcomes after robot-assisted radical cystectomy?
Butt, ZM; Fazili, A; Tan, W; Wilding, GE; Filadora, V; Kim, HL; Mohler, JL; O'Leary, KA; Guru, KA
Bju International, 104(7): 986-990.
10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08539.x
CrossRef
Knee
Simultaneous Bilateral Total Knee Replacement: A persistent controversy
Noble, J; Goodall, JR; Noble, DJ
Knee, 16(6): 420-426.
10.1016/j.knee.2009.04.009
CrossRef
Pediatric Anesthesia
Use of the ASA physical status grading system in pediatric practice
Aplin, S; Baines, D; De Lima, J
Pediatric Anesthesia, 17(3): 216-222.
10.1111/j.1460-9592.2006.02094.x
CrossRef
Annals of Surgery
National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Risk Factors Can Be Used to Validate American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification (ASA PS) Levels
Davenport, DL; Bowe, EA; Henderson, WG; Khuri, SF; Mentzer, RM
Annals of Surgery, 243(5): 636-644.
10.1097/01.sla.0000216508.95556.cc
PDF (405) | CrossRef
Critical Care Medicine
Optimizing postoperative outcomes with efficient preoperative assessment and management
Halaszynski, TM; Juda, R; Silverman, DG
Critical Care Medicine, 32(4): S76-S86.
10.1097/01.CCM.0000122046.30687.5C
PDF (1283) | CrossRef
Back to Top | Article Outline

© 2001 American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc.

Publication of an advertisement in Anesthesiology Online does not constitute endorsement by the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc. or Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. of the product or service being advertised.
Login

Article Tools

Share