Home Current Issue Previous Issues Podcasts Online First ASA Practice Parameters CME For Authors Journal Info
Skip Navigation LinksHome > June 1998 - Volume 88 - Issue 6 > Early Extubation following Cardiac Surgery in a Veterans Pop...
Anesthesiology:
Clinical Investigations

Early Extubation following Cardiac Surgery in a Veterans Population

London, Martin J. MD; Shroyer, Laurie A. PhD.; Coll, Joseph R. MS; MaWhinney, Samantha ScD; Fullerton, David A. MD; Hammermeister, Karl E. MD; Grover, Frederick L. MD

Free Access
Article Outline
Collapse Box

Author Information

Collapse Box

Abstract

Background: Early tracheal extubation is an important component of the “fast track” cardiac surgery pathway. Factors associated with time to extubation in the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) population are unknown. The authors determined associations of preoperative risk and intraoperative clinical process variables with time to extubation in this population.
Methods: Three hundred four consecutive patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft, valve surgery, or both on a fast track clinical pathway between October 1, 1993 and September 30, 1995 at a university‐affiliated DVA medical center were studied retrospectively. After univariate screening of a battery of preoperative risk and intraoperative clinical process variables, stepwise logistic regression was used to determine associations with tracheal extubation <or= to 10 h (early) or >10 h (late) after surgery. Postoperative lengths of stay, complications, and 30‐day and 6‐month mortality rates were compared between the two groups.
Results: One hundred forty‐six patients (48.3%) were extubated early; one patient required emergent reintubation (0.7%). Of the preoperative risk variables considered, only age (odds ratio, 1.80 per 10‐yr increment) and preoperative intra‐aortic balloon pump (odds ratio, 7.88) were multivariately associated with time to extubation (model R) ("late" association is indicated by an odds ratio >1.00; “early” association is indicated by an odds ratio <1.00). Entry of these risk variables into a second regression model, followed by univariately significant intraoperative clinical process variables, yielded the following associations (model R‐P): age (odds ratio, 1.86 per 10‐yr increment), sufentanil dose (odds ratio, 1.54 per 1‐[micro sign]g/kg increment), major inotrope use (odds ratio, 5.73), platelet transfusion (odds ratio, 10.03), use of an arterial graft (odds ratio, 0.32), and fentanyl dose (odds ratio, 1.45 per 10‐[micro sign]g/kg increment). Time of arrival in the intensive care unit after surgery was also significant (odds ratio, 1.42 per 1‐h increment). Intraoperative clinical process variables added significantly to model performance (P < 0.001 by the likelihood ratio test).
Conclusions: In this population, early tracheal extubation was accomplished in 48% of patients. Intraoperative clinical process variables are important factors to be considered in the timing of postoperative extubation after fast track cardiac surgery.
This article is accompanied by an Editorial View. Please see: Cheng DCH: Fast tract cardiac surgery pathways: Early extubation, process of care, and cost containment. Anesthesiology 1998; 88:1429–33.
RAPIDLY changing reimbursement patterns have increased pressure on both physicians and hospitals to decrease resource consumption in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. [1] This pressure is occurring despite an upward trend in patient risk, with increasing percentages of emergent and re‐do procedures, older patients, and more comorbid factors. [2,3]
Fast track (FT) clinical pathways are increasingly popular in the United States, particularly in private or university medical centers, [4–9] as well as in the United Kingdom and Canada. [10,11] Early postoperative tracheal extubation, facilitated by “lighter” volatile agent‐based anesthesia, is an important component of this protocol [12] and has been associated with earlier discharge from the intensive care unit (ICU), shorter overall hospital length of stay (LOS), and decreased resource utilization. [7,13] A recent prospective, randomized trial demonstrated similar outcomes with early and standard tracheal extubation. [11] However, several of these reports were limited to patients having elective coronary artery bypass grafting and excluded high‐risk patient subgroups.
The Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) health care system performs 7,000 ‐ 8,000 cardiac surgical procedures that require cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) annually at 43 medical centers. It treats patients with a high incidence of comorbid risk factors and is characterized by a high percentage of care delivered by residents in training and constrained financial resources. It is under increasing pressure from federal funding agencies to adapt to the managed care revolution. [14] Given these factors, we believe it useful to identify which patients are candidates for early extubation, an important component of the FT pathway and one with which anesthesiologists are actively involved. We recently presented the first data on implementation of a FT program at a DVA medical center. [15] Considering nearly all patients for early extubation, we noted significant reductions in median time to extubation and hospital LOS, with no increase in postoperative morbidity and 30‐day or 6‐month mortality rates relative to a pre‐FT cohort.
Here we present preoperative risk and intraoperative clinical process variables (acts of care provided during hospitalization) [16,17] univariately and multivariately associated with time to tracheal extubation in the FT portion of our previously reported cohort. Clinical outcomes (postoperatively morbidity and mortality rates and LOS) were compared among patients extubated early and those who were not. Our hypothesis is that discrete patient risk and intraoperative clinical process variables are related to the timing of postoperative tracheal extubation.
Back to Top | Article Outline

Materials and Methods

The Fast Track Clinical Pathway
All patients undergoing cardiac surgery requiring CPB at the Denver Veterans Affairs Medical Center, a university‐affiliated teaching institution, were managed on an FT clinical pathway instituted October 1, 1993. Organizational and operational characteristics of our FT pathway have been described before. [15]
A “light” anesthetic technique incorporating volatile anesthesia (primarily isoflurane or desflurane) and low doses of fentanyl (intravenous bolus) or sufentanil (intravenous bolus or continuous infusion), supplemented with midazolam (intravenous bolus) or propofol (continuous infusion), was used in all patients. Isoflurane was administered via a vaporizer on the CPB machine. Steroids (methylprednisolone sodium succinate) were administered during operation and for 24 h afterward [dagger, dagger] Hypothermic CPB (either mild [32 [degree sign]C] or moderate [28 [degree sign]C] systemic hypothermia) with a membrane oxygenator and intermittent anterograde or retrograde (or both) blood cardioplegia during a single period of aortic cross clamping was used routinely. Patients were considered for early tracheal extubation if they met standard clinical criteria (adequate mental status, strength, oxygenation, normal body temperature, and lack of mediastinal bleeding). [15]
Back to Top | Article Outline
Study Design
After we received institutional review board approval, we began a retrospective data collection. We analyzed data from 304 consecutive patients managed on our FT protocol from October 1, 1993 to September 30, 1995 previously presented as a single cohort. [15] One patient was included twice (initial valve replacement with semi‐elective replacement for endocarditis several months later). Two patients who died, one during operation and one <10 h after operation, were excluded because they did not reach the time to extubation cut point used for logistic regression modeling (explained here subsequently). Three more patients were eliminated because of missing data for one or more of the study variables. Consequently, 299 patients were included in the final multivariate analyses.
Table 1
Table 1
Image Tools
Table 2
Table 2
Image Tools
Table 3
Table 3
Image Tools
Preoperative risk factors known or postulated to be associated with postoperative outcome were selected for univariate screening for an association with timing of extubation based on published evidence and risk models developed by the DVA's Continuous Improvement in Cardiac Surgery Program (CICSP) in the DVA patient population (Table 1). The CICSP logistic regression modeling procedure generates a “risk‐adjusted” estimate of operative mortality based on mandatory reporting of a battery of preoperative risk factors and clinical outcomes for each patient undergoing cardiac surgery in the DVA. [18,19] Other risk factors not specifically included in the CICSP database, but believed by the investigators to influence timing of postoperative extubation, were obtained from the preanesthesia evaluation record. Perioperative processes of care specific to the FT pathway, and others known to influence outcome based on literature review and clinical consensus of the investigators (i.e., surgical procedural details, perfusion details, blood product administration, and intraoperative surgical complications), were considered (Table 2 and Table 3). [5,15,17] Time to extubation was defined as the time from arrival in the ICU until (first) removal of the endotracheal tube. Total postoperative LOS was substituted for time to extubation in patients not extubated (i.e., death or tracheostomy) as long as they met the inclusion criteria of survival past the 10‐h cut point used for the logistic regression (see Modeling of Time to Extubation). Although not a primary endpoint of this analysis, postoperative complications common to cardiac surgery and LOS (preoperative, intensive care, intermediate care and postoperative ward), commonly used as markers of resource utilization, were also considered. [17,18]
Various archival sources were used for data collection, including the medical record (discharge summaries, anesthesia records, nursing and physician progress notes, perfusion records), the DVA hospital computer system database (demographic data, discharge summaries, operative dictations, laboratory data), the CICSP database, specialized software and reports developed by the hospital's Information Resources Management Service for LOS in each hospital ward, and the National Beneficiary Indicator Records Locator System for 6‐month mortality data. [15]
Back to Top | Article Outline
Modeling of Time to Extubation
To determine the appropriate statistical method to correlate time to tracheal extubation with the selected risk and intraoperative clinical process variables, the frequency distribution of time to extubation was examined. Given that we rarely extubate patients after midnight or before 5:00 A.M. because nurse staffing ratios are low then and fewer residents are available, the distribution is bimodal with a nadir in the frequency of extubation occurring 10 ‐ 12 h after operation. This distribution is not amenable to Gaussian transformation required for analysis of time to extubation as a continuous variable. Similarly, the relation between time to extubation and the resource utilization outcome (i.e., time of transfer out of the ICU) is not continuous in our center given that transfer out of the ICU occurs at relatively set times of the day centered around nursing shift changes. Although continuous regression techniques may yield more accurate coefficient estimates (particularly for physiologic variables), [20] we chose dichotomous logistic regression because it is a widely used, conservative approach for this type of distribution.
Our choice of a 10‐h rather than a 12‐h cut point for modeling in the logistic regression model was based on the trend in our current clinical practice toward even earlier tracheal extubation times than used in this cohort, anecdotal clinical observations of similar trends at other centers around the country, and a median time to extubation in the total cohort closer to 10 than to 12 h (10.6 h).
Back to Top | Article Outline
Statistical Analyses
Study variables were initially evaluated by univariate screening. Categorical variables were tested using a chi‐squared test or, when appropriate, Fisher's exact test. Normally distributed continuous variables were compared using a Student's t test; continuous variables not normally distributed were compared nonparametrically using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Variables with a univariate significance level <or= to 0.20 were considered for inclusion in the multivariate model.
An initial model (model R) was constructed considering preoperative risk factors alone, using stepwise logistic regression with entry and exit criteria for variables of P < 0.05. Clock time of arrival into the ICU was included in the initial model to control for the lack of extubation from midnight to 5 A.M. To adjust for temporal trends, the number of days from the institution of the FT protocol for that particular patient was also included. The type of surgery (CABG only vs. valve or valve ‐ CABG) was included to adjust for the different underlying risks of these procedures. Variables identified in the first model were included in a second model (model R‐P) to determine which intraoperative clinical process variables were significant in the presence of the risk factors identified in model R. The type of opioid used for anesthesia (fentanyl vs. sufentanil) was included to interpret the relative risk associated with varying opioid dosage. Quadratic functions of the continuous variables meeting the univariate screening criteria were included in the multivariate model to relax the assumption of constant risk. However, none was significant.
The Wald chi‐squared test statistic was used to determine the significance of the study variables in the multivariate model. For significant variables, odds ratios and corresponding 95% confidence intervals were obtained. An odds ratio <1.0 indicates a significant association between the variable and extubation <or= to 10 h (early). An odds ratio >1.0 indicates a significant association between the variable and extubation >10 h (late). Model discrimination was assessed using the c‐index, which corresponds to the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve relating the sensitivity and specificity of the model in predicting the outcome studied. [21] The maximal value of 1.0 represents perfect discrimination, whereas a value of 0.5 reflects chance discrimination only. Model calibration or “goodness of fit” was assessed using the Hosmer‐Lemeshow statistic, which has a chi‐squared distribution and tests the null hypothesis that there is no difference in the average and predicted outcome rate across subgroups of patients (assigned by deciles of expected risk). A lower Hosmer‐Lemeshow value (with a larger P value) is associated with better model calibration. [22] The likelihood ratio test (a chi‐squared test calculated as twice the difference of the log likelihoods between the model with and without the effect being tested) was used to determine the statistical significance of adding the intraoperative clinical process variables to the preoperative risk model. [23] Data were analyzed using SAS Version 6.10 (Cary, NC).
Back to Top | Article Outline

Results

Study Groups
The median duration of intubation for the entire study population was 10.6 h. One hundred forty‐six patients (48.3%) were extubated within 10 h after surgery.
Back to Top | Article Outline
Univariate Associations
(Table 1) shows preoperative risk factors. Variables significant on univariate screening entered into the first logistic regression analysis (model R) included age, hematocrit, surgical priority, preoperative intra‐aortic balloon pump (IABP), angina class, left main coronary stenosis >or= to 70%, left ventricular contraction score, cardiomegaly, diuretic use, beta blocker use, intravenous nitroglycerin, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, bronchodilator use, creatinine >or= to 2 mg/dl, cerebrovascular disease, peripheral vascular disease, and the CICSP risk estimate. Clock time of arrival into the ICU and days since institution of the FT protocol were also entered. Although statistically significant on univariate analysis, forced expiratory volume in one second was not considered in the multivariate analysis because of a large proportion of missing values (13.2%).
(Table 2) shows “general” intraoperative clinical process variables. Variables significant on univariate screening that were entered into the second logistic regression analysis (model R‐P) included use of an arterial graft, post‐CPB use of nitroglycerin, pre‐CPB inotrope use, major intraoperative inotrope use, IABP for weaning, intraoperative transfusion of fresh frozen plasma, homologous erythrocytes or platelets, total urine output, duration of CPB and ischemic time, total operating room time, and serum glucose level on arrival in the surgical ICU. Clock time of arrival into the ICU was also entered. Although univariately significant, body temperature at the conclusion of surgery was not considered because a large proportion (9.9%) of values were missing.
(Table 3) shows FT “specific” clinical processes of care. Variables entered into the second logistic regression analysis (model R‐P) included total intraoperative crystalloid volume, volatile agent use, type of opioid, doses of fentanyl, sufentanil, and midazolam, percentage of total CPB time isoflurane was used, and use of the mixed venous oxygen saturation pulmonary artery catheter.
Back to Top | Article Outline
Multivariate Associations
Table 4
Table 4
Image Tools
Table 5
Table 5
Image Tools
Multivariate associations are presented in Table 4 and Table 5 along with the corresponding odds ratios and confidence intervals. Significant variables in model R (Table 4) included age and preoperative IABP along with type of surgery (CABG alone vs. valve or valve ‐ CABG) and the clock time of arrival into the ICU. In model R‐P (Table 5), of the initial risk variables, age and the clock time into the ICU remained significant. Significant intraoperative clinical process variables included use of an arterial graft, major inotrope use, platelet transfusion, and the dose of fentanyl or sufentanil. Of these variables, those related to early extubation (odds ratio <1.00) were use of an arterial graft, and those associated with late extubation (odds ratio >1.00) were major inotrope use, platelet transfusion, dose of opioid, and time of arrival in the ICU. Of the continuous variables, increasing doses of either sufentanil or fentanyl and later time of arrival into the ICU were associated with later tracheal extubation.
Model performance, assessed by the c‐index (model R, 0.764 vs. model R‐P, 0.853) and the Hosmer‐Lemeshow statistic P value (model R, 0.463 vs. model R‐P, 0.782), was superior in model R‐P. The likelihood ratio test between model R and model R‐P (P < 0.001) indicated a significant benefit of adding intraoperative clinical process variables to the baseline risk model.
Back to Top | Article Outline
Patient Outcomes and Length of Stay
Table 6
Table 6
Image Tools
(Table 6) shows patient outcomes. Only one patient extubated early required emergent reintubation (0.68%). The frequency of late reintubation for medical reasons (i.e., cardiac, respiratory failure, sepsis, and other conditions not temporally related to the initial extubation) was lower in the early extubation group (2.1% vs. 7.7%, P < 0.024). For each of the major postoperative complications, there were trends toward lower frequencies in the early extubation group, although statistical significance was reached only for adult respiratory distress syndrome (0.0% vs. 3.9%, P < 0.03). Similar patterns were present for minor postoperative complications, with significance reached only in the frequency of nosocomial pneumonia (3.4% vs. 11%, P < 0.012). The frequency of additional postoperative surgical procedures (3.4% vs. 10.3%, P < 0.05), 30‐day (0.0 vs. 7.7%, P < 0.001) and 6‐month mortality (1.4% vs. 10.9%, P < .001) were also significantly lower. There were no documented episodes of recall of intraoperative events in either group.
Preoperative LOS was not significantly different between groups. The lengthy preoperative LOS is due to a predominance of patients who underwent cardiac catheterization on the same admission (150 of 302, or 49.7%), most of whom were admitted with unstable angina. Statistically significant differences were noted in postoperative LOS in both monitored surgical ICU ‐ intermediate care units and unmonitored ward settings, with the greatest difference in the monitored settings (33% for the surgical ICU alone, 25% for surgical ICU ‐ stepdown unit, 19% for total postoperative stay, P < 0.001 for each). The median postoperative day of discharge was significantly shorter in the early extubation group (day 6 vs. 8, P < 0.001).
Back to Top | Article Outline

Discussion

Nearly half of consecutive, unselected patients undergoing primary or redo CABG, valve surgery, or both in a DVA medical center managed on an FT clinical pathway were extubated within 10 h of surgery. Previously we found a reduction in time to extubation and LOS without significant change in morbidity or mortality rates in sequential consecutive cohorts, before and after institution of our FT pathway. [15] Considering the FT cohort from that report, the present analysis suggests that with the exception of patient age and preoperative use of IABP, intraoperative clinical “process” variables (i.e., “acts of care”) are more highly associated with the timing of postoperative extubation than are preoperative risk factors alone. [16,17]
Our observations, if validated in a prospective study, may facilitate development of clinical prediction models that would allow clinicians to triage “high risk” patients (based on preoperative factors) to early extubation if the clinical process variables indicate a “low risk” or “successful” operation. This modeling approach may better facilitate internal benchmarking, comparison of results from different institutions, or both. Because our approach uses intraoperative clinical process variables assessed until the time when patients leave the operating room, preoperative prediction of the timing of extubation is not the ultimate goal. However, it emphasizes the importance of selected variables related to patient selection, surgical and anesthetic management, and overall system efficiency in FT management. Future studies could target specific factors that can be modified to maximize the percentage of patients that have early tracheal extubation.
Back to Top | Article Outline
Model R Multivariate Associations
Of the preoperative risk factors univariately screened, only age and preoperative IABP were independently associated with later extubation. Time of arrival in the ICU was also significant. This factor, clearly not a preoperative risk factor, was required in the statistical analysis to “control” for the bimodal distribution of time to extubation caused by a lack of extubation in the late night or early morning hours.
The adverse effects of increasing age on outcome and resource use in patients undergoing cardiac surgery are documented. [18,24] Increasing age not only has adverse effects on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of anesthetic agents [25] but also increases the risk of adverse central nervous system effects of CPB. [26] Recently, Ott et al. [9] showed that elderly patients (167 patients >or= to 70 yr old) may be safely managed on an “aggressive” FT protocol. However, only 19% of the elderly were discharged before the fifth postoperative day, in contrast to 48% of the younger cohort.
The adverse association of preoperative IABP was expected given that this was one of the few exclusion criteria followed by most clinicians at this center. However, two patients with preoperative IABP were extubated early with good results. The primary concerns in these patients, aside from potential hemodynamic instability, are the conflicting nursing considerations of having the patient in a sitting position (advantageous for weaning and extubation) rather than supine (advantageous for IABP management and removal). Although most centers share these same concerns, Ott et al. [9] recently presented data from an FT cohort in which approximately 50% of patients had preoperative IABPs placed. It is implied that most of these patients were extubated 4 ‐ 8 h after operation.
Time of arrival in the ICU was significant, with later time of arrival successively decreasing the probability of early tracheal extubation. This is likely related to concerns regarding safety of extubation in the late evening or early morning hours. Our current experience is that this effect is less prominent. However, we believe it particularly important in the developmental and earlier history of an FT program. It is also one that can be emphasized in quality improvement efforts.
Back to Top | Article Outline
Model R‐P Multivariate Associations
Use of an arterial graft (in this study a single left internal mammary artery was used predominantly) was associated with early tracheal extubation. The beneficial effects of this artery as a bypass conduit on operative mortality risk and long‐term patient outcome are documented. [27] However, internal mammary artery dissection has been associated with postoperative decline in expiratory flow rates and lung volumes and with increased postoperative pain. [28,29]
We cannot explain the beneficial association of arterial grafting that we observed. Neither Arom et al. [6] nor Habib et al. [8] included this variable in their analyses. In contrast, all patients in the randomized study of Cheng et al. [11] had internal mammary artery grafts. It is possible that our surgeons felt that internal mammary artery grafting was contraindicated in the patients at highest risk. [27] It is also possible that patients receiving an internal mammary artery graft had a greater increase in early post‐CPB cardiac function, facilitating earlier extubation.
Several variables were independently associated with later extubation. Of the preoperative risk variables, age and time of arrival in the ICU remained statistically significant in model R‐P.
The adverse association of major inotrope use (defined as the use of two or more catecholamines or a phosphodiesterase inhibitor inotrope for at least 30 min) is likely related to the greater degree of hemodynamic instability and poor cardiac function in these patients. Potential statistical interaction of this variable with preoperative ejection fraction and post‐CPB IABP may account for the lack of significance of these variables.
An adverse association with intraoperative platelet transfusion, rather than homologous erythrocyte or fresh frozen plasma transfusion, was observed. Longer CPB times are generally considered to induce a greater degree of coagulopathy due to platelet activation and degranulation, although the precise cause is controversial. [30] Thus platelet transfusion could be more closely associated with total CPB duration than either erythrocyte or fresh frozen plasma requirements. It is also possible that platelet transfusion has deleterious physiologic effects on postoperative pulmonary function. A limitation of our analysis was lack of consideration of additional blood products transfused after operation.
The type of surgery was not significant, suggesting that patients undergoing valve repair or replacement or combined procedures were not at increased risk for later tracheal extubation. Although the percentage of valve patients in this study was small (11% of < 10 h and 15.4% of >or= to 10 h), this finding is of interest, particularly because similar data have been presented in only one other study. [10] In the DVA, valve surgery has been associated with a twofold increase in complications related to the timing of extubation (mechanical ventilation >48 h, low cardiac output syndrome, and reoperation for bleeding) compared with CABG alone. [18] A more recent private sector study suggests improved outcomes in the past decade. [24]
Our data related to anesthetic technique must be interpreted cautiously given a nonrandomized, retrospective study design. The odds ratio for the use of fentanyl (3.41) suggests an adverse effect of this opioid, although a borderline P value and wide confidence interval (the lower boundary crossing 1.0) suggests inadequate statistical power. In patients who were hemodynamically unstable immediately after CPB, it is likely that a decision not to extubate early was made in the operating room and additional doses of opioid were administered specifically for postoperative sedation.
Back to Top | Article Outline
Association of Early Extubation with Patient Outcome and Length of Stay
Early extubation was associated with shorter postoperative LOS, particularly in the intensive care and intermediate care units. We could not determine actual cost or charge differences between groups because these data are not widely available in the DVA system. Furthermore, inefficiencies in dynamic reallocation of resources (i.e., nursing and ancillary staff ratios in a particular clinical unit) in response to changes in patient volume complicate the relation between LOS and costs of health in surgical settings. [13,31] Private sector studies have documented monetary savings associated with early extubation, primarily by reductions in direct variable components of cost. [5–7,13]
There were trends toward lower postoperative morbidity (minor or major) in patients who were extubated early, including a reduction in the frequency of nosocomial pneumonia. In our previous report, considering all FT patients together, we noted a reduction in nosocomial pneumonia compared with our pre‐FT cohort. [15] However, as noted in that study, limitations of retrospective analysis in coding this variable are substantial. The frequency of several “minor” complications (i.e., need for supplemental nasal oxygen, arrhythmias, and so forth) was not different between early and late extubated patients.
The observed difference in both 30‐day and 6‐month mortality between early and late extubated patients was striking. However, our study has inadequate statistical power to determine the association of early extubation with mortality risk. Furthermore, it is unlikely that early extubation has any direct causal role in influencing the mortality risk in most patients.
Back to Top | Article Outline
Study Limitations and Confounding Factors
Limitations of our study include retrospective data collection, use of a single center, a predominantly male population, limited sample size, possible confounding effects of steroid administration, and temporally associated changes in other processes of care unrelated to our FT pathway. Several of these have been addressed previously. [15] Data from a single center are subject to unmeasured, unreported, or chance processes and structures of care (who provides the care) unique to that center. [16] Our status as a university‐affiliated institution with residents providing care may differentiate us from nonaffiliated DVA medical centers and private sector institutions.
Our models were developed using a relatively small sample size. Although our ratio of outcome events to significant variables is greater than 10, above the threshold considered acceptable to avoid model overfitting [32] and our goodness‐of‐fit indices suggest that model R‐P has high discriminative ability, [33] we do not recommend use of these data for clinical prediction because of the study design limitations already noted.
Use of perioperative steroids may have had an independent effect on early extubation. Steroid administration (usually methylprednisolone sodium succinate) was advocated in two influential early FT studies. [4,5] Purported benefits include reduction or blockade of inflammatory mediators generated by CPB implicated in the postoperative “systemic inflammatory response.” [34] Because our FT pathway included routine steroid administration, we cannot assess its impact.
Our models failed to consider physician‐specific factors (structures of care), particularly qualifications, training, and volume of procedures performed. These factors influence the choice and quality of clinical processes performed. In addition, the degree of resident supervision by attending physicians may be important. These factors are being considered in a larger, prospective study. [35]
Finally, time to extubation is a surrogate outcome among the primary outcomes of cardiac surgery: clinical safety, resource consumption (including LOS), patient satisfaction, long‐term functioning, and so forth. Given our study design, we could not address these. However, because anesthesiologists are most involved in this portion of the FT, we believe our data are of interest.
Back to Top | Article Outline
Comparison with Other Studies
Our findings are consistent with previously reported non‐DVA studies of early extubation. [4–8,10,11,13] The percentage of patients extubated early (within a 8 ‐ 12 h time frame) and the mean time to extubation are comparable, although comparison is complicated by varying definitions for preoperative risk variables and exclusion of valve procedures. Our study had a distinctly higher incidence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and a near absence of female patients. Female sex may impart additional operative risk in CABG surgery [36] and was an adverse risk factor for early extubation univariately in one study and multivariately in another. [6,8] Increasing age and transfusion of blood products, factors we found significant, were also identified in other studies. [6,8] Although no study has conclusively modeled clinical safety, outcomes are relatively similar. Although LOS in monitored settings was shorter in other studies, our total postoperative LOS is similar.
Back to Top | Article Outline

Conclusions

Our results suggest that the conduct of the surgical procedure as measured by intraoperative clinical process variables (including markers of inotrope use, transfusion, opioid dose, and use of an arterial graft for revascularization) adds significantly to information obtained from preoperative risk factors alone (age and preoperative IABP) in the timing of postoperative extubation. Some of these factors are likely markers of intraoperative problems (i.e., multiple inotropes, need for transfusion), whereas opioid dosages may indicate inefficient management or, more likely, a response to decision making against early extubation in the operating room. The “protective” effect of use of an arterial graft is unclear and is possibly related to preoperative risk factors, although a “better” cardiac response to revascularization cannot be discounted. Valve surgery (with or without CABG) was not an adverse factor, although the number of patients is small. Later times of arrival in the ICU were associated with longer times to tracheal extubation. Given our study's limitations, we cannot determine causal relations between these variables and timing of extubation, although we have identified factors worthy of further study (such as modifiable factors that could result in quality improvement). Early extubation in this cohort appeared to be well tolerated, although a larger, prospective study is required to establish its clinical safety and relation to clinical outcomes and lengths of stay.
The authors thank Sharon Del Hotal for secretarial assistance and Charles P. Gibbs, M.D., Chairman, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, for support.
[dagger, dagger] The intraoperative methylprednisolone sodium succinate dose was increased from 100 to 500 mg given intravenously in June 1994; postoperative administration (125 mg given intravenously every 8 h for three doses) was sporadic until April 1994.
Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES

1. Loop FD: You are in charge of cost [Editorial]. Ann Thorac Surg 1995; 60:1509-12

2. Williams TE Jr, Fanning WJ, Link L, Benton WC, Kakos GS, Miller RL, Hankins TD, Blom DP: Can we afford to do cardiac operations in 1996? A risk-reward curve for cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 1994; 58:815-20

3. Disch DL, O'Connor GT, Birkmeyer JD, Olmstead EM, Levy DG, Plume SK: Changes in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: 1987-1990. Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group. Ann Thorac Surg 1994; 57:416-23

4. Krohn BG, Kay JH, Mendez MA, Zubiate P, Kay GL: Rapid sustained recovery after cardiac operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1990; 100:194-7

5. Engelman RM, Rousou JA, Flack JE, Deaton DW, Humphrey CB, Ellison LH, Allmendinger PD, Owen SG, Pekow PS: Fast-track recovery of the coronary bypass patient. Ann Thorac Surg 1994; 58:1742-6

6. Arom KV, Emery RW, Petersen RJ, Schwartz M: Cost-effectiveness and predictors of early extubation. Ann Thorac Surg 1995; 60:127-32

7. Lee JH, Kim KH, vanHeeckeren DW, Murrell HK, Cmolik BL, Graber R, Effron B, Geha AS: Cost analysis of early extubation after coronary bypass surgery. Surgery 1996; 120:611-7

8. Habib RH, Zacharias A, Engoren M: Determinants of prolonged mechanical ventilation after coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 1996; 62:1164-71

9. Ott RA, Gutfinger DE, Miller MP, Alimadadian H, Tanner TM: Rapid recovery after coronary artery bypass grafting: Is the elderly patient eligible? Ann Thorac Surg 1997; 63:634-9

10. Chong JL, Pillai R, Fisher A, Grebenik C, Sinclair M, Westaby S: Cardiac surgery: Moving away from intensive care. Br Heart J 1992; 68:430-3

11. Cheng DC, Karski J, Peniston C, Asokumar B, Raveendran G, Carroll J, Nierenberg H, Roger S, Mickle D, Tong J, Zelovitsky J, David T, Sandler A: Morbidity outcome in early versus conventional tracheal extubation after coronary artery bypass grafting: A prospective randomized controlled trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996; 112:755-64

12. Shapiro BA, Lichtenthal PR: Inhalation-based anesthetic techniques are the key to early extubation of the cardiac surgical patient [Editorial]. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1993; 7:135-6

13. Cheng DC, Karski J, Peniston C, Raveendran G, Asokumar B, Carroll J, David T, Sandler A: Early tracheal extubation after coronary artery bypass graft surgery reduces costs and improves resource use. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Anesthesiology 1996; 85:1300-10

14. Igelhart JK: Reform of the Veterans Affairs Health Care System. N Engl J Med 1996; 335:1407-11

15. London MJ, Shroyer AL, Jernigan V, Fullerton DA, Wilcox D, Baltz J, Brown JM, MaWhinney S, Hammermeister KE, Grover FL: Fast-track cardiac surgery in a Department of Veterans Affairs patient population. Ann Thorac Surg 1997; 64:134-41

16. Hammermeister KE: Why it is important to demonstrate linkages between outcomes of care and processes and structures of care. Med Care 1995; 33:OS5-16

17. Shroyer AL, London MJ, Sethi GK, Marshall G, Grover FL, Hammermeister KE: Relationships between patient-related risk factors, processes, structures, and outcomes of cardiac surgical care. Conceptual models. Med Care 1995; 33:OS26-34

18. Hammermeister KE, Burchfiel C, Johnson R, Grover FL: Identification of patients at greatest risk for developing major complications at cardiac surgery. Circulation 1990; 82(suppl IV):IV-380-9

19. Grover FL, Johnson RR, Shroyer AL, Marshall G, Hammermeister KE: The Veterans Affairs Continuous Improvement in Cardiac Surgery Study. Ann Thorac Surg 1994; 58:1845-51

20. Suissa S, Blais L: Binary regression with continuous outcomes. Stat Med 1995; 14:247-55

21. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ: The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982; 143:29-36

22. Hosmer DW, Taber S, Lemeshow S: The importance of assessing the fit of logistic regression models: A case study. Am J Public Health 1991; 81:1630-5

23. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S: Applied Logistic Regression. New York, John Wiley & Sons, 1989, pp 31-4

24. Rao V, Christakis GT, Weisel RD, Buth KJ, Ikonomidis JS, Shirai T, Cohen G, David TE: Changing pattern of valve surgery. Circulation 1996; 94(suppl II):II-113-20

25. Glass PS: Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic principles in providing “fast-track” recovery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1995; 9(suppl 1):16-20

26. Newman MF, Kramer D, Croughwell ND, Sanderson I, Blumenthal JA, White WD, Smith LR, Towner EA, Reves JG: Differential age effects of mean arterial pressure and rewarming on cognitive dysfunction after cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg 1995; 81:236-42

27. Grover FL, Johnson RR, Marshall G, Hammermeister KE: Impact of mammary grafts on coronary bypass operative mortality and morbidity. Ann Thorac Surg 1994; 57:559-68

28. Shapira N, Zabatino SM, Ahmed S, Murphy DM, Sullivan D, Lemole GM: Determinants of pulmonary function in patients undergoing coronary bypass operations. Ann Thorac Surg 1990; 50:268-73

29. Cohen AJ, Moore P, Jones C, Miner TJ, Carter WR, Zurcher RP, Lupkas R, Edwards FH: Effect of internal mammary harvest on postoperative pain and pulmonary function. Ann Thorac Surg 1993; 56:1107-9

30. Gelb AB, Roth RI, Levin J, London MJ, Noall RA, Hauck WW, Cloutier M, Verrier E, Mangano DT: Changes in blood coagulation during the following cardiopulmonary bypass: Lack of correlation with clinical bleeding. Am J Clin Pathol 1996; 106:87-99

31. Dexter F, Tinker JH: Analysis of strategies to decrease postanesthesia care unit costs. Anesthesiology 1995; 82:94-101

32. Concato J, Feinstein AR, Holford TR: The risk of determining risk with multivariable models. Ann Intern Med 1993; 118:201-10

33. Braitman LE, Davidoff F: Predicting clinical states in individual patients. Ann Intern Med 1996; 125:406-12

34. Cremer J, Martin M, Redl H, Bahrami S, Abraham C, Graeter T, Haverich A, Schlag G, Borst HG: Systemic inflammatory response syndrome after cardiac operations. Ann Thorac Surg 1996; 61:1714-20

35. Shroyer AL, London MJ, VillaNueva CB, Sethi GK, Marshall G, Moritz TE, Henderson WG, McCarthy MJ Jr, Grover FL, Hammermeister KE: The Processes, Structures, and Outcomes of Care in Cardiac Surgery study protocol. Med Care 1995; 33:OS17-25

36. Christakis GT, Weisel RD, Buth KJ, Fremes SE, Rao V, Panagiotopoulos KP, Ivanov J, Goldman BS, David TE: Is body size the cause for poor outcomes of coronary artery bypass operations in women? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995; 110:1344-56

Keywords:
Clinical protocols; complications; epidemiology; length of stay; mortality

© 1998 American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc.

Publication of an advertisement in Anesthesiology Online does not constitute endorsement by the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc. or Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. of the product or service being advertised.
Login

Article Tools

Images

Share

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.