Skip Navigation LinksHome > August 1996 - Volume 85 - Issue 2 > Density of Lumbar Cerebrospinal Fluid in Pregnant and Nonpre...
Anesthesiology:
Clinical Investigation

Density of Lumbar Cerebrospinal Fluid in Pregnant and Nonpregnant Humans

Richardson, Michael G. MD; Wissler, Richard N. MD, PhD

Free Access
Article Outline
Collapse Box

Author Information

Collapse Box

Abstract

Background: Dextrose‐free local anesthetics and opioids, alone and in combinations, are being used increasingly to provide subarachnoid anesthesia and analgesia. These dextrose‐free drugs have been described as hypobaric by some and isobaric by others. To accurately classify anesthetics with regard to baricity, the density of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) must be known. The authors sought to determine the exact density of human CSF, and determine whether CSF density is altered by pregnancy.
Methods: Density measurements accurate to 0.00001 g/ml were made at 37.00 degrees C, using a mechanical oscillation resonance frequency density meter. Cerebrospinal fluid samples were obtained from 44 patients during spinal anesthesia. Five groups were studied: men, and premenopausal, postmenopausal, term pregnant, and postpartum women.
Results: Mean CSF densities in men (1.00064+/‐0.00012 g/ml), postmenopausal women (1.00070+/‐0.00018 g/ml), and nonpregnant premenopausal women (1.00049+/‐0.00004 g/ml) were significantly greater than in term pregnant (1.00030+/‐0.00004 g/ml) and postpartum (1.00034+/‐0.00005 g/ml) women. Cerebrospinal fluid density did not correlate with age.
Conclusions: Mean CSF density varies in different patient subpopulations. Pregnancy and the immediate postpartum period are associated with the lowest CSF densities. In addition, the cutoff values defining hypobaricity (mean CSF density minus three standard deviations) are greater than previously reported. Accurate CSF density values should be used when considering baricity as a mechanism for clinical observations of dextrose‐free intrathecal local anesthetics and opioids. Gestational status also should be considered.
THE density difference between an intrathecal anesthetic solution and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is a major determinant of extent of spinal block. [1] Densities of nondextrose‐containing intrathecal local anesthetics and opioids have been determined recently and are thought to be very close in value to the density of human CSF. [2,3] The values for the density of human CSF derive from two earlier reports. [4,5] These values have been useful for comparison with dextrose‐containing intrathecal solutions that are clearly hyperbaric. However, accuracies of mass, volume, and temperature measurements were limited by the techniques used in both studies. The studies also reported different means, each with large standard deviations (1.00100+/‐0.000304 and 1.00030 +/‐0.000305 g/ml). The techniques used in earlier CSF density studies limit comparisons with current spinal anesthetic solution densities. As a result, dextrose‐free solutions continue to be described as hypobaric by some and isobaric by others. [6,7] In addition, both previous reports restricted study subjects to particular population subsets, neither including pregnant women. Although CSF composition has been compared in pregnant and nonpregnant women, [8,9] CSF density in pregnancy is unknown. We obtained CSF from individuals in several patient subpopulations and measured density with greater accuracy than was reported previously (+/‐0.00001 g/ml). We then compared densities among the subgroups, which included women during and immediately after pregnancy.
Back to Top | Article Outline

Materials and Methods

After approval from the human subjects review board and informed consent, 44 healthy ASA physical status 1 and 2 patients undergoing spinal anesthesia for various procedures were studied. Specific groups studied were men (n = 10), postmenopausal women (n = 8), nonpregnant premenopausal women (n = 6), women undergoing postpartum tubal ligation (n = 10), and parturients at term gestation undergoing elective Cesarean section (n = 10). Parturients with preeclampsia were excluded. Patient age was noted, as were gestational age and time since delivery, when applicable. Lumbar CSF was collected via a 25‐G Whitacre needle at the time of induction of spinal anesthesia. After confirming free flow of clear CSF and before intrathecal injection of spinal anesthetic, 2 ml clear CSF was collected for immediate analysis.
Equation 1
Equation 1
Image Tools
The density of CSF at 37 degrees C was determined using a density meter (DA‐310, Mettler‐Toledo, Hightstown, NJ) that uses the mechanical oscillation resonance frequency technique. Samples are injected into a glass measuring cell. The cell is stimulated to determine the oscillation period generated at its natural oscillation frequency. The oscillation period (T) depends on the density, volume, and temperature of the sample. A cell factor (F) is calculated from the oscillation periods of two different standard substances (desiccated air and distilled water) at a specific temperature (37.00+/‐0.01 degree C). The density (d) of an unknown sample is calculated when its oscillation period (T) is determined: Equation 1 where dA is the density of desiccated air and TA is the oscillation period of desiccated air. Calibration was verified before and after each CSF density measurement, using desiccated air and distilled deionized water (dA = 0.99114 g/ml and dw = 0.99333 g/ml at 37 degrees C, respectively). After the calibration procedure recommended by the manufacturer (Mettler‐Toledo), density measurements are accurate to+/‐0.00001 g/ml in the range of 0–3 g/ml. An electronically controlled thermistor maintained temperature of the sample and the measuring cell at 37.00 degrees C, with a temperature control accuracy of+/‐0.01 degree C.
Cerebrospinal fluid densities are expressed as mean (g/ml) +/‐SD. The upper limit of hypobaricity was calculated for each group as defined previously (mean CSF density minus three standard deviations of the mean). [1,4] Comparisons between groups were made using one‐way analysis of variance. Pair‐wise comparisons were then made, using Tukey's post hoc test method of multiple comparisons, with a 5% overall error rate. The subgroups of women selected in the design of this study were likely to have significantly different mean ages (e.g., pregnant women are more likely to be much younger than postmenopausal women), making age a potential confounding variable. Therefore, we performed analysis of covariance controlling for group, then for age, to determine whether density differences are explained by age. Linear regression was performed to analyze the relation between density and time between delivery and CSF sampling. For all determinations, P < 0.05 determined significance.
Back to Top | Article Outline

Results

Figure 1
Figure 1
Image Tools
Table 1
Table 1
Image Tools
Individual CSF density measurements are shown in Figure 1. Mean CSF densities, standard deviations of measurements, and upper limits of hypobaricity for each group are presented in Table 1. Analysis of variance revealed significant differences in CSF density between groups (P < 0.0001). Pair‐wise comparisons revealed that CSF density during the peripartum period (term pregnant and postpartum groups) is significantly less than in men and nonpregnant pre‐ and postmenopausal women (Table 1). Means, standard deviations, and ranges of ages in each group are also shown in Table 1. Density differences are not explained by age, because analysis of covariance controlling for group revealed no effect of age on density. Controlling for age, analysis of covariance showed the groups to differ still (P = 0.02). There was no correlation between density and time from delivery to CSF sampling in postpartum women, which ranged from 9 to 70.5 h (mean 28.1+/‐17.5 h).
Back to Top | Article Outline

Discussion

Figure 2
Figure 2
Image Tools
The density of a spinal anesthetic solution relative to human CSF (i.e., baricity) is an important determinant of extent of subarachnoid block. [1,10,11] Stienstra and colleagues showed that small differences in density (0.00060 g/ml) influence intrathecal distribution of local anesthetics both clinically [12] and in an in vitro model. [13] Several authors recently proposed that small density differences between CSF and dextrose‐free intrathecal agents could explain the rapid, high sensory block observed after administration of local anesthetics and/or lipid‐soluble opioids for labor analgesia. [10,11,14–16] Baricity also was proposed as an explanation for postural differences in extent of block produced by dextrose‐free intrathecal anesthetics. [6,17] Hypobaric intrathecal solutions have been defined as those with densities less than three standard deviations below mean human CSF density. [1,4] Previous CSF density studies suggest that this upper limit of hypobaricity is 0.99980 g/ml4 or 0.99940 g/ml5 (Figure 2). Most authors quote the latter. [2,3] Our data suggest that actual values are greater (1.00016–1.00037 g/ml), and vary for different subgroups of patients (Table 1, Figure 2). Therefore, density differences between dextrose‐free intrathecal drugs and CSF are greater than previously reported. [2,3] These findings are consistent with hypobaricity as a mechanism to explain postural effects on extent of sensory block and side effects produced by dextrose‐free intrathecal anesthetics. [10,11,14–16].
Two groups of investigators previously measured the density of human CSF at 37 degrees C, [4,5] each reporting different means (Figure 2). Davis and King [4] studied 9 patients (7 males, 2 females) undergoing pneumoencephalography for central neurologic disorders, and Levin et al. studied 9 healthy male volunteers. [5] Densities were calculated from mass and volume measured at 37 degrees Celsius. Both studies reported 1.7‐ to 7.5‐fold larger standard deviations than we observed (Table 1, Figure 2). Reduced accuracy and unspecified precision of mass, volume, and temperature measurements associated with their techniques limit the findings of both. In addition, restriction of determinations to specific subpopulations (individuals with neurologic disorders [4] and male volunteers [5]) limits application of their results to all patients. These differences in technique and patient selection likely account for the differences between our results and those of the previous reports.
Our data indicate that CSF density is significantly lower in the peripartum period. The chemical basis of this finding remains to be elucidated. Two previous studies failed to demonstrate a significant difference in CSF total protein content between pregnant and nonpregnant patients, [8,9] although a wide range of values was reported in both groups. Progesterone may be a physiologic mediator of altered CSF densities during human pregnancy, because progesterone treatment of estrogen‐primed nonpregnant rabbits significantly alters Sodium+, Potassium+ ‐ATPase activity in isolated choroid plexi. [18] This enzymatic activity is the primary driving force for CSF production. [19].
We chose the mechanical oscillation technique to measure density because of its well‐established accuracy (+/‐0.00001 g/ml) and high level of precision. [20–23],* Pycnometry predated the mechanical oscillation technique for density determination, and despite its limitations, had been the method of choice for density determination. [22] However, soon after its introduction in 1966, the mechanical oscillation technique supplanted pycnometry as the preferred method for density determination for fluids (including gases, aqueous and nonaqueous liquids, organic and inorganic solutions, and colloidal suspensions) in a variety of industries, for both research and quality applications. [20],* This method has been compared to pycnometry, and is simpler, requires less time and smaller samples, and gives more reproducible results.*
Although all samples were inspected visually for gross blood contamination, we did not perform microscopic examination of the CSF samples. Although nonvisible amounts of blood may impact on density measurements, this source of error would be expected to confound results of previous studies as well. Such contamination also would be expected to influence density measurements in each of the five groups evaluated in this study, which does not appear to be the case, given the intergroup differences in both density means and standard deviations of the means. Because the density of human blood is significantly greater than that of CSF, [20,23] blood contamination of CSF samples would be expected to result in significantly greater density values. However, mean CSF density values of all five groups were found to be intermediate between the two previously reported values. The most striking finding is the exceedingly high reproducibility in each of the five groups studied.
In summary, we determined values for the density of human CSF. The ranges of values measured are much narrower than previously reported, likely because of the greater accuracy and precision of the measurement technique used. The values defining hypobaricity of intrathecal solutions are greater than previously proposed. In addition, we observed significant differences in mean CSF density among subgroups studied, with density significantly lower at term gestation and immediately after pregnancy as compared with men and nonpregnant women. Consideration of baricity as a mechanism for observed differences in extent of block using different dextrose‐free intrathecal solutions should take into account differences in CSF densities between patient subgroups.
The authors thank Ronald A. Gabel, M.D., for assistance in the preparation of the manuscript.
*Strunk DH, Aicken JC, Hamman JW, Andreasen AA: Density meter determination of proof of ethanol‐water solutions: Collaborative study. Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists 1982; 65:218–23.*.
Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES

1. Greene NM: Distribution of local anesthetic solutions within the subarachnoid space. Anesth Analg 1985; 64:715-30.

2. Nicol ME, Holdcroft A: Density of intrathecal agents. Br J Anaesth 1992; 68:60-3.

3. Horlocker TT, Wedel DJ: Density, specific gravity, and baricity of spinal anesthetic solutions at body temperature. Anesth Analg 1993; 76:1015-8.

4. Davis H, King WR: Densities of cerebrospinal fluid of human beings. ANESTHESIOLOGY 1954; 15:666-72.

5. Levin E, Muravchick S, Gold MI: Density of normal human cerebrospinal fluid and tetracaine solutions. Anesth Analg 1981; 60:814-7.

6. Russell IF: Spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery with dilute solutions of plain bupivacaine: The relationship between infused volume and spread. Reg Anesth 1991; 16:130-6.

7. Abouleish A, Abouleish E, Camann W: Combined spinal-epidural analgesia in advanced labour. Can J Anaesth 1994; 41:575-8.

8. Marx GF, Orkin LR: Cerebrospinal fluid proteins and spinal anesthesia in obstetrics. ANESTHESIOLOGY 1965; 26:340-3.

9. Davis LE: Normal laboratory values of CSF during pregnancy. Arch Neurol 1979; 36:443.

10. Cohen SE, Cherry CM, Holbrook RH Jr, El-Sayed YY, Gibson RN, Jaffe RA: Intrathecal sufentanil for labor analgesia—sensory changes, side effects, and fetal heart changes. Anesth Analg 1993; 77:1155-60.

11. Blomqvist H, Nilsson A: Is glucose-free bupivacaine isobaric or hypobaric? Reg Anesth 1989; 14:195-8.

12. Stienstra R, van Poorten JF: The temperature of bupivacaine 0.5% affects the sensory level of spinal anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1988; 67:272-6.

13. Stienstra R, Gielen M, Kroon JW, Van Poorten F: The influence of temperature and speed of injection on the distribution of a solution containing bupivacaine and methylene blue in a spinal canal model. Reg Anesth 1990; 15:6-11.

14. Campbell DC, Camann WR, Datta S: The addition of bupivacaine to intrathecal sufentanil for labor analgesia. Anesth Analg 1995; 81:305-9.

15. Hamilton CL, Cohen SE: High sensory block after intrathecal sufentanil for labor analgesia. ANESTHESIOLOGY 1995; 83:1118-21.

16. Richardson MG, Lee AC, Wissler RN: High spinal anesthesia after epidural test dose administration in five obstetric patients. Reg Anesth 1996; 21:119-23.

17. Carrie LES, O'Sullivan G: Subarachnoid bupivacaine 0.5% for caesarean section. Eur J Anaesthesiol 1984; 1:275-83.

18. Lindvall-Axelsson M, Owman C: Actions of sex steroids and corticosteroids on rabbit choroid plexus as shown by changes in transport capacity and rate of cerebrospinal fluid formation. Neurol Res 1990; 12:181-6.

19. Strange K: Regulation of solute and water balance and cell volume in the central nervous system. J Am Soc Nephrol 1992; 3:12-27.

20. Hinghofer-Szalkay H: Method of high-precision microsample blood and plasma densitometry. J Appl Physiol 1986; 60:1082-8.

21. Hinghofer-Szalkay H: Volume and density changes of biological fluids with temperature. J Appl Physiol 1985; 59:1686-9.

22. Kenner T, Leopold H, Hinghofer-Szalkay H: The continuous high-precision measurement of the density of flowing blood. Pflugers Arch 1977; 370:25-9.

23. Kenner T: The measurement of blood density and its meaning. Basic Res Cardiol 1989; 84:111-24.

Cited By:

This article has been cited 41 time(s).

Revista De Neurologia
Corrected cerebrospinal fluid manometry by measurement of the density and its relation with its biochemical composition
Miranda-Aguilaro, HA; Reymundo-Ponce, RG
Revista De Neurologia, 36(1): 26-32.

Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie
Body habitus does not influence spread of sensory blockade after the intrathecal injection of a hypobaric solution in term parturients
Wong, CA; Cariaso, D; Johnson, EC; Leu, D; McCarthy, RJ
Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie, 50(7): 689-693.

British Journal of Anaesthesia
Use of dextrose to produce isobaric solutions of bupivacaine and bupivacaine-opioid combinations at 37 degrees C
Hallworth, SP; Fernando, R; Stocks, G; England, AJ
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 83(3): 520P-521P.

International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
Heavy bupivacaine has no advantage over plain bupivacaine in spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section
Howell, P
International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia, 8(4): 262-265.

Anesthesia and Analgesia
Isobaric versus hypobaric spinal bupivacaine for total hip arthroplasty in the lateral position
Faust, A; Fournier, R; Van Gessel, E; Weber, A; Hoffmeyer, P; Gamulin, Z
Anesthesia and Analgesia, 97(2): 589-594.
10.1213/01.ANE.0000070228.13782.ED
CrossRef
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Single-shot spinal block for labour analgesia in multiparous parturients
Viitanen, H; Viitanen, M; Heikkila, M
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 49(7): 1023-1029.
10.1111/j.1399-6576.2005.00803.x
CrossRef
Anesthesia and Analgesia
Intrathecal hypobaric versus hyperbaric bupivacaine with morphine for cesarean section
Richardson, MG; Collins, HV; Wissler, RN
Anesthesia and Analgesia, 87(2): 336-340.

Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie
Intrathecal plain vs hyperbaric bupivacaine for labour analgesia: efficacy and side effects
Rofaeel, A; Lilker, S; Fallah, S; Goldszmidt, E; Carvalho, J
Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie, 54(1): 15-20.

Paediatric Anaesthesia
The effect of baricity of intrathecal morphine in children receiving tetracaine spinal anaesthesia for cardiac surgery: a preliminary report
Finkel, JC; Boltz, MG; Conran, AM
Paediatric Anaesthesia, 12(4): 327-331.

Anaesthesia
The spread and side-effects of intrathecally administered bupivacaine - Reply
Critchley, LAH; Morley, AP; Derrick, J
Anaesthesia, 54(): 1017.

Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine
Intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine dose response in postpartum tubal ligation patients
Huffnagle, SL; Norris, MC; Huffnagle, HJ; Leighton, BL; Arkoosh, VA
Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, 27(3): 284-288.
10.1053/rapm.2002.31210
CrossRef
British Journal of Anaesthesia
Spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section with bupivacaine 5 mg ml(-1) in glucose 8 or 80 mg ml(-1)
Connolly, C; McLeod, GA; Wildsmith, JAW
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 86(6): 805-807.

British Journal of Anaesthesia
Density of spinal anaesthetic solutions of bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and ropivacaine with and without dextrose
McLeod, GA
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 92(4): 547-551.
10.1093/bja/aeh094
CrossRef
British Journal of Anaesthesia
Intrathecal drug spread
Hocking, G; Wildsmith, JAW
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 93(4): 568-578.
10.1093/bja/aeh204
CrossRef
Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie
The addition of fentanyl does not alter the extent of spread of intrathecal isobaric bupivacaine in clinical practice
Patterson, L; Avery, N; Chan, P; Parlow, JL
Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie, 48(8): 768-772.

Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Intrathecal ropivacaine 5 mg/ml for outpatient knee arthroscopy: a comparison with lidocaine 10 mg/ml
Fanelli, G; Danelli, G; Zasa, M; Baciarello, M; Di Cianni, S; Leone, S
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 53(1): 109-115.
10.1111/j.1399-6576.2008.01815.x
CrossRef
Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie
Density determination of local anaesthetic opioid mixtures for spinal anaesthesia
Hare, GMT; Ngan, JCS
Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie, 45(4): 341-346.

Anesthesia and Analgesia
Spinal ropivacaine for cesarean delivery: A comparison of hyperbaric and plain solutions
Khaw, KS; Kee, WDN; Wong, M; Ng, F; Lee, A
Anesthesia and Analgesia, 94(3): 680-685.

Anaesthesia and Intensive Care
A randomised controlled trial of hyperbaric bupivacaine with opioids, injected as either a mixture or sequentially, for spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section
Desai, S; Lim, Y; Tan, CH; Sia, ATH
Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, 38(2): 280-284.

Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie
Densities of cerebrospinal fluid and spinal anaesthetic solutions in surgical patients at body temperature
Lui, ACP; Polis, TZ; Cicutti, NJ
Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie, 45(4): 297-303.

International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
Heavy bupivacaine has no advantage over plain bupivacaine in spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section
Aveling, W
International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia, 8(4): 260-261.

Anesthesia and Analgesia
Spinal chloroprocaine solutions: Density at 37 degrees C and pH titration
Na, KB; Kopacz, DJ
Anesthesia and Analgesia, 98(1): 70-74.
10.1213/01.ANE.0000093244.01831.D7
CrossRef
Anesthesia and Analgesia
Spinal 2-chloroprocaine: The effect of added dextrose
Warren, DT; Kopacz, DJ
Anesthesia and Analgesia, 98(1): 95-101.
10.1213/01.ANE.0000093362.95618.89
CrossRef
Anesthesia and Analgesia
Densities of dextrose-free intrathecal local anesthetics, opioids, and combinations measured at 37 degrees C
Richardson, MG; Wissler, RN
Anesthesia and Analgesia, 84(1): 95-99.

Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie
Effects of baricity of 0.5% or 0.75% levobupivacaine on the onset time of spinal anesthesia: a randomized trial
Danelli, G; Baciarello, M; Di Cianni, S; Zasa, M; De Marco, G; Adamanti, S; Fanelli, G
Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie, 55(8): 501-506.

Anesthesia and Analgesia
Maternal posture influences the extent of sensory block produced by intrathecal dextrose-free bupivacaine with fentanyl for labor analgesia
Richardson, MG; Thakur, R; Abramowicz, JS; Wissler, RN
Anesthesia and Analgesia, 83(6): 1229-1233.

Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie
Small dose spinal bupivacaine for Cesarean delivery does not reduce hypotension but accelerates motor recovery
Bryson, GL; MacNeil, R; Jevaraj, LM; Rosaeg, OP
Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie, 54(7): 531-537.

Anesthesiology
Intrathecal plain vs. hyperbaric bupivacaine with morphine for cesarean section: Comparison of effectiveness, side effects, and sedation
Richardson, MG; Collins, HV; Wissler, R
Anesthesiology, 87(3): A890.

Anaesthesia
The spread and side-effects of intrathecally administered bupivacaine
Hallworth, S; Fernando, R
Anaesthesia, 54(): 1016.

British Journal of Anaesthesia
Lateral positioning for regional analgesia during labour
Richardson, MG; Wissler, RN
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 79(2): 261-262.

Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Combined effect of patient variables on sensory level after spinal 0.5% plain bupivacaine
Pargger, H; Hampl, KF; Aeschbach, A; Paganoni, R; Schneider, MC
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 42(4): 430-434.

British Journal of Anaesthesia
Influence of sex on cerebrospinal fluid density in adults
Schiffer, E; Van Gessel, E; Gamulin, Z
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 83(6): 943-944.

American Journal of Neuroradiology
Change in brain size during and after pregnancy: Study in healthy women and women with preeclampsia
Oatridge, A; Holdcroft, A; Saeed, N; Hajnal, JV; Puri, BK; Fusi, L; Bydder, GM
American Journal of Neuroradiology, 23(1): 19-26.

Anesthesia and Analgesia
The effect of posture and baricity on the spread of intrathecal bupivacaine for elective Cesarean delivery
Hallworth, SP; Fernando, R; Columb, MO; Stocks, GM
Anesthesia and Analgesia, 100(4): 1159-1165.

Anasthesiologie & Intensivmedizin
The controllability of local anaesthetic spread during spinal anaesthesia-still a challenge?
Litz, RJ; Koch, T
Anasthesiologie & Intensivmedizin, 48(): 404-415.

Anesthesiology
Cerebrospinal Fluid Density Influences Extent of Plain Bupivacaine Spinal Anesthesia
Schiffer, E; Van Gessel, E; Fournier, R; Weber, A; Gamulin, Z
Anesthesiology, 96(6): 1325-1330.

PDF (101)
Anesthesiology
Intrathecal Sufentanil Dose Response in Nulliparous Patients
Ferouz, F; Silverman, NS; Huffnagle, J; Huffnagle, S; Leighton, BL; Arkoosh, VA; Cooper, M; Norris, MC; Boxer, L
Anesthesiology, 89(2): 364-370.

PDF (5069)
European Journal of Anaesthesiology (EJA)
Spinal anaesthesia with 0.5% isobaric bupivacaine in patients with diabetes mellitus: the influence of CSF composition on sensory and motor block
Echevarria, M; Hachero, A; Martinez, A; Ramallo, E; García-Bernal, D; Ramos, M; Fernández, A
European Journal of Anaesthesiology (EJA), 25(12): 1014&hyhen;1019.
10.1017/S0265021508004729
PDF (80) | CrossRef
Anesthesiology
Baricity, Needle Direction, and Intrathecal Sufentanil Labor Analgesia
Ferouz, F; Norris, MC; Arkoosh, VA; Leighton, BL; Boxer, LM; Corba, RJ
Anesthesiology, 86(3): 592-598.

PDF (4939)
Anesthesiology
Modifying the Baricity of Local Anesthetics for Spinal Anesthesia by Temperature Adjustment: Model Calculations
Heller, AR; Zimmermann, K; Seele, K; Rössel, T; Koch, T; Litz, RJ
Anesthesiology, 105(2): 346-353.

PDF (1091)
Anesthesiology
Influence of Lumbosacral Cerebrospinal Fluid Density, Velocity, and Volume on Extent and Duration of Plain Bupivacaine Spinal Anesthesia
Higuchi, H; Hirata, J; Adachi, Y; Kazama, T
Anesthesiology, 100(1): 106-114.

PDF (549)
Back to Top | Article Outline
Keywords:
Anesthesia: spinal; Cerebrospinal fluid: density; Pregnancy: human

© 1996 American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc.

Publication of an advertisement in Anesthesiology Online does not constitute endorsement by the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc. or Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. of the product or service being advertised.
Login

Article Tools

Images

Share

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.