Desflurane Reduces the Gain of Thermoregulatory Arteriovenous Shunt Vasoconstriction in Humans
Kurz, Andrea MD; Xiong, Junyu MD; Sessler, Daniel I. MD; Dechert, Martha BA; Noyes, Katherine BS; Belani, Kumar MD
Background: Thermoregulatory responses, such as arteriovenous shunt vasoconstriction, provide substantial protection against core hypothermia. A response can be characterized by its threshold (core temperature triggering response), gain (rate at which response intensity increases, once triggered), and maximum response intensity. Reduced gain decreases the efficacy of a thermoregulatory response at a given threshold because response intensity will increase more slowly than usual. The effects of general anesthesia on the gain of arteriovenous shunt vasoconstriction have not been reported. Accordingly, we tested the hypothesis that desflurane decreases the gain of centrally mediated vasoconstriction.
Methods: We studied seven healthy male volunteers. Each was studied twice: (1) desflurane (end‐tidal concentration 0.4 minimum alveolar concentration); and (2) control (no anesthesia). Mean skin and fingertip temperatures were controlled at 35.5 degrees Celsius throughout the study. Core temperature was reduced at a rate of 1.5 degrees Celsius/h by central venous infusion of cold fluid. Fingertip arteriovenous shunt flow was measured using venous occlusion volume plethysmography at 1‐min intervals. Flow was also evaluated using the perfusion index and laser Doppler flowmetry. Vasoconstriction thresholds were calculated as the core temperatures triggering fingertip flows of 1.0 ml/min (beginning of vasoconstriction) and 0.25 ml/min (intense vasoconstriction). The gain of vasoconstriction was considered to be the slope of the fingertip flow versus core temperature regression within the linear range from 1.0 ml/min to 0.15 ml/min. The minimum observed flow was considered maximum vasoconstriction intensity. Data are presented as means plus/minus SD; P < 0.01 was considered statistically significant.
Results: The vasoconstriction threshold (when defined using a flow of 1.0 ml/min) was reduced from 36.8 plus/minus 0.3 degree Celsius to 35.6 plus/minus 0.3 degree Celsius by desflurane anesthesia (P < 0.01). Desflurane reduced the gain of vasoconstriction by a factor of three, from 2.4 to 0.8 ml *symbol* min sup ‐1 *symbol* degrees Celsius1 (P < 0.01). Gains, as determined by the perfusion index and laser Doppler flowmetry, were likewise reduced (P < 0.01). The threshold on the control day was only 0.2 plus/minus 0.1 degree Celsius less when significant vasoconstriction was defined as a flow of 0.25 ml/min rather than 1.0 ml/min. Because gain was reduced, however, the threshold during desflurane administration was 0.8 plus/minus 0.2 degree Celsius less when significant vasoconstriction was defined by a flow of 0.25 ml/min. Minimum flows were comparable and near zero with and without anesthesia.
Conclusions: The threshold reduction (1.2 degrees Celsius/0.4 minimum alveolar concentration) was similar to that observed previously during isoflurane anesthesia. Similarly, it is established already that maximum vasoconstriction intensity is comparable with and without isoflurane anesthesia. However, the data also indicate that even relatively low desflurane concentrations markedly reduce the gain of vasoconstriction. It is likely that reduced gain (i.e., slow onset of vasoconstriction) contributes to core hypothermia in some surgical patients. (Key words: Temperature: hypothermia. Thermoregulation: threshold; vasoconstriction.)
THERMOREGULATORY responses can be characterized by their thresholds (core temperatures triggering responses), gains (rates at which response intensities increases, once triggered), and maximum response intensities. [1,2]
The effects of general [3–5]
and regional [6,7]
anesthesia on response thresholds are reasonably well characterized. Similarly, the effects of age, [8,9]
painful stimulation, [10,11]
and vascular volume depletion 
have been described.
Maximum response intensity of vasoconstriction 
and sweating [4,16]
appear reasonably well preserved during general anesthesia. Sweating gain is essentially normal during isoflurane 
and enflurane 
anesthesia, although shivering gain may be somewhat reduced during nitrous oxide administration. 
The effects of general anesthesia on the gains of other thermoregulatory responses, however, have not been reported.
Insufficient gain will decrease the effectiveness of a thermoregulatory response, even at a given threshold, because response intensity will increase more slowly than usual. Reduced gain of thermoregulatory vasoconstriction would be clinically important because vasoconstriction is the primary intraoperative defense against core hypothermia. [18–20]
Accordingly, we tested the hypothesis that desflurane decreases the gain of vasoconstriction.
With approval from the Committee on Human Research at the University of California, San Francisco and written informed consent, we studied seven male volunteers, each on two occasions. None was obese or taking medication, and none had a history of thyroid disease, dysautonomia, Raynaud's syndrome, or malignant hyperthermia. The volunteers' morphometric characteristics included: age 29 plus/minus 6 yr, height 174 plus/minus 2 cm, and weight 78 plus/minus 12 kg.
Studies started at approximately 9:30 AM and volunteers fasted during the 8 h preceding each study. Throughout the study, minimally clothed volunteers reclined on an operating room table set in chaise‐lounge position.
The volunteers were each studied on two sequential days, once during 0.4 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC; 2.8%) desflurane anesthesia and once without anesthesia. On the first study day, an internal jugular catheter was inserted using echo sonography to locate the vessel and minimize risk of the procedure. Between study days, a small amount of heparin sodium was injected into the tubing, and the catheter was sealed.
On the desflurane day, general anesthesia was induced by administration of 200 mg propofol, 70% nitrous oxide, 0.1 mg/kg vecuronium, and incremental concentrations of desflurane to [nearly equal] 10%. The volunteers' tracheas were then intubated and anesthesia was maintained with desflurane 0.4 MAC in air/oxygen. The patients' lungs were mechanically ventilated to maintain an end‐tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure near 35 mmHg. Additional vecuronium was administered, as necessary, to maintain 1–2 mechanical twitches in response to supramaximal train‐of‐four stimulation of the ulnar nerve at the wrist. A catheter was inserted into the urinary bladder, and urine output was recorded at 30‐min intervals.
Throughout the study period, mean skin and fingertip temperatures were controlled at 35.5 degrees Celsius by adjusting the temperature of circulating‐water (Cincinnati Sub‐Zero, Cincinnati, OH) and forced‐air warmers (Augustine Medical, Inc., Eden Prairie, MN). After confirming that the volunteers' fingertips were vasodilated (see below), lactated Ringer's solution cooled to [nearly equal] 3 degrees Celsius was infused via the central venous catheter at rates sufficient to decrease tympanic membrane temperature [nearly equal] 1.5 degrees Celsius/h. Fluid was administered as long as fingertip blood flow continued to decrease; the study concluded when further reduction in core temperature no longer decreased finger flow. On the desflurane day only, 10 mg intravenous furosemide was administered when the infusion was started.
Core temperature was recorded from the tympanic membrane using Mon‐a‐Therm thermocouples (donated by Mallinckrodt Anesthesiology Products, Inc., St. Louis, MO). Visual inspection with an otoscope confirmed that the ear canal was free of wax in each volunteer. The aural probe was then inserted by volunteers until they felt the thermocouple touch the tympanic membrane; appropriate placement was confirmed when volunteers easily detected gentle rubbing of the attached wire. The aural canal was occluded with cotton, the probe was securely taped in place, and a gauze bandage was positioned over the external ear. There is an excellent correlation between tympanic membrane and distal esophageal temperatures in the perianesthetic period. 
Mean skin‐surface temperature was determined from 15 area‐weighted sites including the right fingertip. 
All temperatures were recorded using Mon‐a‐Therm thermocouples or probes incorporated into thermal flux transducers (Concept Engineering, Old Saybrook, CT), as described previously. 
Temperatures were recorded from thermocouples connected to calibrated Iso‐Thermex 16‐channel electronic thermometers having an accuracy of 0.1 degree Celsius and a precision of 0.01 degrees Celsius (Columbus Instruments International, Corp., Columbus, OH). Individual and mean‐skin temperatures were computed by a data acquisition system, displayed at 1‐s intervals, and recorded at 1‐min intervals.
Right index fingertip blood flow was quantified using volume plethysmography, as described previously. 
Vascular tone also was evaluated on the right second finger using the perfusion index, which is derived from absorption of two infrared wave lengths. 
Finally, fingertip flow was estimated using laser Doppler flowmetry with an integrating multi‐probe (Periflux 3, Perimed Inc., Piscataway, NJ, wide‐band setting) positioned on the fourth finger of the right hand. [24–26]
Laser Doppler flowmetry evaluates both capillary and arteriovenous shunt flow, although the flowmeter we used is most sensitive to capillary flow. 
All measures of flow were recorded at 1‐min intervals.
Fingertip flows vary constantly because sudomotor waves are superimposed on thermoregulatory shunt tone. [28,29]
Additionally, there is some variability introduced by the measurement technique per se. Consequently, the raw finger flows from each study day were smoothed using a five‐point moving average filter. Perfusion index and laser Doppler data were similarly smoothed.
Thresholds were defined by the core temperatures triggering: (1) a fingertip flow of [nearly equal] 1 ml/min, which corresponds to a forearm minus fingertip skin‐temperature gradient near 0 degree Celsius (mild vasoconstriction); and (2) a fingertip flow of 0.25 ml/min, corresponding to a skin‐temperature gradient near 4 degrees Celsius (intense vasoconstriction). 
The effect of core cooling on plethysmographic finger blood flow was determined as follows: (1) The core temperatures at flows of 1.0 ml/min on the control and desflurane days were designated thresholds in each subject. (2) Finger flows were then calculated relative to the individual threshold temperatures under each condition. Because flow measurements were taken at specific time intervals rather than fixed temperature intervals, available data from each volunteer within 0.1 degree Celsius core temperature increments were averaged. Core temperature increments of 0.05 degrees Celsius were occasionally used for steep sections of the flow/temperature response curve. Subsequently, the population means were calculated from these individual averages. (3) Finally, the average flow values for the population were plotted relative to the mean thresholds with and without desflurane.
Inspection of preliminary volume plethysmographic data indicated that finger flows between [nearly equal] 1.0 and 0.15 ml/min were roughly linear functions of core temperature both on the control day and during desflurane administration. Furthermore, these values define the clinically important range from mild to intense vasoconstriction. Gain of vasoconstriction on the control day was thus considered to be the slope of the population flow versus core temperature linear regression in the flow range of 1.0–0.15 ml/min. Gain during desflurane administration was calculated using the same temperature range. Gains of vasoconstriction, in terms of the perfusion index and laser Doppler flow, were considered to be the regression slopes over the same respective core temperature ranges.
Fingertip flow at the end of each study day‐‐when further decrease in core temperature no longer reduced finger flow‐‐identified the maximum vasoconstriction intensity. Thresholds and maximum vasoconstriction intensities with and without anesthesia were compared using two‐tailed, paired t tests. Differences between the thresholds as defined by a finger flow of 1.0 ml/min and 0.25 ml/min were similarly compared using paired t tests. And finally, the gains of vasoconstriction, with and without desflurane, were compared using t tests modified for use with regression slopes. Results are expressed as means plus/minus standard deviations; differences were considered statistically significant when P < 0.01.
Mean skin and fingertip temperatures were maintained nearly constant throughout the protocol (Figure 1
). End‐tidal desflurane concentrations averaged 2.8 plus/minus 0.1% during the study. No volunteer experienced recall of events during administration of desflurane; there were no study‐related complications.
Fluid was administered at rates of 35 plus/minus 8 and 39 plus/minus 8 ml/min during the control and desflurane trials, respectively (P = NS). However, more hypothermia was required during desflurane so total administered fluid differed significantly: 1.8 plus/minus 1.2 versus 4.2 plus/minus 1.5 l. Urine output was not recorded on the control day; however, urine output was 1.9 plus/minus 0.8 l during desflurane administration.
Desflurane significantly reduced the gain of vasoconstriction as determined by volume plethysmography by a factor of three, from 2.4 to 0.8 ml *symbol* min sup ‐1 *symbol* degrees Celsius sup ‐1 (P < 0.01, Figure 2
). Gains, as determined using the perfusion index and laser Doppler flowmetry, were comparably reduced (P < 0.01, Figure 3
and Figure 4
The vasoconstriction threshold (when defined using a flow of 1.0 ml/min) was significantly reduced from 36.8 plus/minus 0.3 degree Celsius to 35.6 plus/minus 0.3 degree Celsius by desflurane anesthesia. The threshold on the control day was only 0.2 plus/minus 0.1 degree Celsius less when significant vasoconstriction was defined as a flow of 0.25 ml/min rather than 1.0 ml/min. Because gain was reduced, however, the threshold during desflurane administration was 0.8 plus/minus 0.2 degree Celsius less when significant vasoconstriction was defined as a flow of 0.25 ml/min rather than 1.0 ml/min. Minimum flows were near zero and comparable with and without anesthesia (Table 1
Thermoregulatory vasoconstriction is the primary defense against intraoperative core hypothermia. (Shivering is rare during anesthesia and nonshivering thermogenesis is unimportant in anesthetized adults. 
) Once triggered, vasoconstriction usually prevents further core hypothermia by decreasing cutaneous heat loss 
and constraining metabolic heat to the core thermal compartment. 
The clinical importance of this response is illustrated by exaggerated core hypothermia in patients given combined epidural/general anesthesia in whom sympathetic block prevents vasoconstriction in the legs. 
Similarly, core cooling rates during induction of therapeutic hypothermia are reduced in vasoconstricted patients. 
Mean skin‐surface temperature contributes [nearly equal] 10–20% to central control of thermoregulatory defenses. [31,32]
However, arteriovenous shunt [33,34]
vasoconstriction is also mediated by local skin temperature. Local temperature dominates at low (i.e., < 20 degrees Celsius) and high (i.e., > 35 degrees Celsius) skin temperatures. [35–37]
Although central control dominates at typical skin temperatures, local temperature modulates central responses throughout the physiologic range. [38,39]
Local modulation is unlikely to influence maximum vasoconstriction intensity and probably exerts relatively little influence on thermoregulatory response thresholds. However, local skin warming markedly decreases sensitivity of alpha‐adrenergic receptors (that is, more norepinephrine release is required to produce a given amount of vasoconstriction). 
The expected consequence of reduced receptor sensitivity is decreased gain.
Just 0.4 MAC desflurane reduced the gain of thermoregulatory vasoconstriction by a factor of 3. Reductions were similar when evaluated using laser Doppler flowmetry or the perfusion index. Vasoconstriction intensity, once triggered, thus increases gradually during desflurane administration. As a result, a larger than usual reduction in core temperature will be required to reach maximum vasoconstriction intensity. Reduced gain of vasoconstriction during desflurane anesthesia contrasts strikingly with the gain of sweating and active vasodilation, which are well preserved even at 1 MAC isoflurane. The extent to which anesthesia alters the gain of other thermoregulatory responses such as shivering remains to be evaluated.
From a clinical perspective, reduced gain means that additional core hypothermia will develop while vasoconstriction intensity gradually increases to an effective magnitude. This conclusion, however, applies only when local skin temperature is maintained at a high level‐‐as when cutaneous warming is used to offset large heat losses from within surgical incisions 
or from administration of unwarmed intravenous fluids. 
In the more usual case in which skin temperature is not actively maintained, vasoconstriction per se will decrease local skin temperature [nearly equal] 10 degrees Celsius. 
This decrease will, in turn, facilitate vasoconstriction by increasing gain, and thus produce the typical rapid progression from full vasodilation to full vasoconstriction. 
Thresholds are most formally identified by the core temperatures triggering initiation of thermoregulatory responses. To minimize potential bias, however, we have generally used objective endpoints. One endpoint we used for initiation of vasoconstriction is a forearm minus fingertip skin‐temperature gradient of 0 degree Celsius, which corresponds to a fingertip flow of [nearly equal] 1 ml/min; conversely, an endpoint we have used for intense vasoconstriction is a skin‐temperature gradient of 4 degrees Celsius, corresponding to a fingertip flow of [nearly equal] 0.25 ml/min. 
When gain is high, it makes little difference which flow identifies "significant" vasoconstriction. For example, the difference between thresholds defined using 1.0 and 0.25 ml/min finger flow differed by only [nearly equal] 0.2 degree Celsius without anesthesia‐‐a clinically unimportant distinction. As gain diminishes, however, the core temperature difference between the flows expands. Consistent with this theory, the threshold defined by a flow of 0.25 ml/min was [nearly equal] 0.8 degree Celsius less than when a flow of 1.0 ml/min was considered significant. A difference of this magnitude certainly could be important and might represent a systematic error in threshold studies. However, as specified earlier, this difference will only be apparent when extremity temperature is actively maintained to prevent the otherwise inevitable vasoconstriction‐induced decrease in local skin temperature. Because we have always been careful to shield the extremities from active thermal manipulations during threshold studies, clinically important bias is unlikely to result from an anesthetic‐induced reduction in gain.
All anesthetics evaluated so far reduce vasoconstriction thresholds. [25,42,43]
And as expected, desflurane also decreased the vasoconstriction threshold. The threshold was reduced [nearly equal] 1.2 degrees Celsius by 0.4 MAC desflurane, which is only slightly less than the reduction produced by isoflurane. 
These data are consistent with our general impression that available volatile anesthetics produce roughly comparable thermoregulatory inhibition. 
However, the vasoconstriction threshold‐‐and probably other thermoregulatory thresholds as well‐‐are altered by age, [8,9]
and painful stimulation. [10,11]
Consequently, thresholds identified in the volunteers we studied should be extrapolated to patients with some caution.
Maximum vasoconstriction intensity (i.e., minimum fingertip flow) was similar with and without desflurane. We previously reported comparable maximum vasoconstriction intensities with 
and without 
isoflurane anesthesia. Furthermore, the maximum sweating intensity is minimally reduced by isoflurane or enflurane administration. [4,16]
These results thus suggest that the maximum efficacy of vasoconstriction and sweating are well maintained in the face of volatile anesthetics. In contrast to vasoconstriction and sweating, the effect of volatile anesthetics on the threshold, gain, and maximum intensity of shivering has yet to be reported. Because shivering is at least in part controlled by the spinal cord, [45–47]
the effects of anesthetics on shivering may well differ from anesthetic effects on the other major thermoregulatory defense.
We precisely controlled fingertip as well as mean‐skin temperatures throughout the protocol because both local and central temperature contribute to the gain of vasoconstriction. We maintained a fingertip temperature near 35.5 degrees Celsius during this study, which is typical for normothermic, vasodilated patients. It is likely that gain, and the effect of desflurane on gain, would differ at other skin temperatures. However, we were restricted to a relatively high skin temperature because in preliminary studies we found that lower mean skin temperatures did not reliably produce complete vasodilation on the control day.
Unavoidable consequences of maintaining high skin temperature include a reduction in the vasoconstriction threshold and a marked increase in the amount of fluid required to reduce core temperature. In preliminary studies we found it impossible to reach the vasoconstriction threshold and evaluate gain at higher desflurane concentrations (or higher skin temperatures) while reasonably restricting central venous fluid administration. As a result, we tested only a single, relatively low, alveolar partial pressure of desflurane. It is likely that gain is further reduced at greater anesthetic concentrations, but confirmation of this hypothesis will require a different study design.
Although administration rates were similar, more intravenous fluid was required during desflurane administration than on the control day. The effect of vascular volume expansion on the gain of thermoregulatory vasoconstriction remains unknown; to the extent that hyperhydration reduces gain, our results may overestimate desflurane‐induced inhibition of vasoconstriction. However, urine output was copious on the desflurane day (nearly 21) because furosemide was administered. Consequently, it is likely that vascular volume expansion was comparable on the two treatment days.
Gain of thermoregulatory responses is defined by the rate at which response intensity increases, once triggered. 
There is no physiologic requirement that gain for a particular response be a linear function of core temperature; nonetheless, response intensity versus core temperature plots for common thermoregulatory defenses often include relatively linear portions. [4,17,48]
Such a linear portion was apparent for arteriovenous shunt vasoconstriction in the flow range between 1.0 and 0.15 ml/min.
Despite our efforts, fingertip temperature was generally 0.25–0.5 degrees Celsius higher during desflurane administration. However, it is unlikely that this small deviation explains the observed threefold reduction in gain. Although volume plethysmography is generally considered the "gold standard" for arteriovenous shunt flow, even this measure is subject to potential errors. Consequently, it is encouraging that gain, as evaluated using laser Doppler flowmetry and the perfusion index, was comparably reduced by desflurane administration. It is unlikely that these three different measures of flow all were incorrect.
In summary, desflurane reduced the vasoconstriction threshold [nearly equal] 1.2 degrees Celsius. The centrally mediated gain of vasoconstriction, as determined by volume plethysmography, was reduced by a factor of three, from 2.4 to 0.8 ml *symbol* min sup ‐1 *symbol* degrees Celsius sup ‐1 (P < 0.01). Gains, as determined by the perfusion index and laser Doppler flowmetry, were likewise significantly reduced. Minimum flows were near zero and comparable with and without anesthesia. This threshold reduction was analogous to that observed previously during isoflurane anesthesia. Similarly, it is already established that maximum vasoconstriction intensity is comparable with and without isoflurane anesthesia. Our novel result is thus that even relatively low desflurane concentrations markedly reduce the gain of vasoconstriction. It is likely that reduced gain (i.e., slow onset of vasoconstriction) contributes to core hypothermia in some surgical patients.
The authors thank Takashi Matsukawa, M.D., Department of Anesthesia, Yamanashi Medical University, Yamanashi, Japan.
1. Sessler DI: Perianesthetic thermoregulation and heat balance in humans. FASEB J 7:638-644, 1993.
2. Jessen C, Mayer ET: Spinal cord and hypothalamus as core sensors of temperature in the conscious dog. I. Equivalence of responses. Pflugers Arch 324:189-204, 1971.
3. Stoen R, Sessler DI: The thermoregulatory threshold is inversely proportional to isoflurane concentration. ANESTHESIOLOGY 72:822-827, 1990.
4. Washington D, Sessler DI, Moayeri A, Merrifield B, Prager M, McGuire J, Belani K, Hudson S, Schroeder M: Thermoregulatory responses to hyperthermia during isoflurane anesthesia in humans. J Appl Physiol 74:82-87, 1993.
5. Farber NE, Poterack KA, Kampine JP, Schmeling WT: The effects of halothane, isoflurane, and enflurane on thermoregulatory responses in the neuraxis of cats. ANESTHESIOLOGY 80:879-891, 1994.
6. Emerick TH, Ozaki M, Sessler DI, Walters K, Schroeder M: Epidural anesthesia increases apparent leg temperature and decreases the shivering threshold. ANESTHESIOLOGY 81:289-298, 1994.
7. Ozaki M, Kurz A, Sessler DI, Lenhardt R, Schroeder M, Moayeri A, Noyes KM, Rotheneder E: Thermoregulatory thresholds during spinal and epidural anesthesia. ANESTHESIOLOGY 81:282-288, 1994.
8. Kurz A, Plattner O, Sessler DI, Huemer G, Redl G, Lackner F: The threshold for thermoregulatory vasoconstriction during nitrous oxide/isoflurane anesthesia is lower in elderly than young patients. ANESTHESIOLOGY 79:465-469, 1993.
9. Inoue Y, Nakao M, Araki T, Murakami H: Regional differences in the sweating responses of older and younger men. J Appl Physiol 71:2453-2459, 1991.
10. Washington DE, Sessler DI, McGuire J, Hynson J, Schroeder M, Moayeri A: Painful stimulation minimally increases the thermoregulatory threshold for vasoconstriction during enflurane anesthesia in humans. ANESTHESIOLOGY 77:286-290, 1992.
11. Oberle J, Elam M, Karlsson T, Gunner WB: Temperature-dependent interaction between vasoconstrictor and vasodilator mechanisms in human skin. Acta Physiol Scand 132:459-469, 1988.
12. Lopez M, Sessler DI, Walter K, Emerick T, Ozaki M: Rate and gender dependence of the sweating, vasoconstriction, and shivering thresholds in humans. ANESTHESIOLOGY 80:780-788, 1994.
13. Fox RH, Lofstedt BE, Woodward PM, Eriksson E, Werkstrom B: Comparison of thermoregulatory function in men and women. J Appl Physiol 26:444-453, 1969.
14. Nadel ER, Fortney SM, Wenger CB: Effect of hydration state on circulatory and thermal regulations. J Appl Physiol 49:715-721, 1980.
15. Sessler DI, Hynson J, McGuire J, Moayeri A, Heier T: Thermoregulatory vasoconstriction during isoflurane anesthesia minimally decreases heat loss. ANESTHESIOLOGY 76:670-675, 1992.
16. Lopez M, Ozaki M, Sessler DI, Valdes M: Physiological responses to hyperthermia during epidural anesthesia and combined epidural/enflurane anesthesia in women. ANESTHESIOLOGY 78:1046-1054, 1993.
17. Mekjavic IB, Sundberg CJ: Human temperature regulation during narcosis induced by inhalation of 30% nitrous oxide. J Appl Physiol 73:2246-2254, 1992.
18. Belani K, Sessler DI, Sessler AM, Schroeder M, McGuire J, Washington D, Moayeri A: Leg heat content continues to decrease during the core temperature plateau in humans. ANESTHESIOLOGY 78:856-863, 1993.
19. Joris H, Ozaki M, Sessler DI, Hardy AF, Lamay M, McGuire J, Blanchard D, Schroeder M, Moayeri A: Epidural anesthesia impairs both central and peripheral thermoregulatory control during general anesthesia. ANESTHESIOLOGY 80:268-277, 1994.
20. Kurz A, Sessler DI, Birnbauer F, Illievich U, Spiss C: Thermoregulatory vasoconstriction impairs active core cooling. ANESTHESIOLOGY 82:870-876, 1995.
21. Matsukawa T, Sessler DI, Sessler AM, Schroeder M, Ozaki M, Kurz A, Cheng C: Heat flow and distribution during induction of general anesthesia. ANESTHESIOLOGY 82:662-673, 1995.
22. Rubinstein EH, Sessler DI: Skin-surface temperature gradients correlate with fingertip blood flow in humans. ANESTHESIOLOGY 73:541-545, 1990.
23. Ozaki M, Sessler DI, Lopez M, Walter K: Pulse oximeter-based flow index correlates well with fingertip volume plethysmography (abstract). ANESTHESIOLOGY 79:A542, 1993.
24. Holloway Jr GA, Watkins DW: Laser Doppler measurement of cutaneous blood flow. J Invest Dermatol 69:306-309, 1977.
25. Sessler DI, Olofsson CI, Rubinstein EH: The thermoregulatory threshold in humans during nitrous oxide-fentanyl anesthesia. ANESTHESIOLOGY 69:357-364, 1988.
26. Diresta GR, Kiel JW, Riedel GL, Kaplan P, Shepherd AP: Hybrid blood flow probe for simultaneous Hydrogen sub 2 clearance and laser-Doppler velocimetry. Am J Physiol 253:G573-G581, 1987.
27. Hirata K, Nagasaka T, Noda Y: Partitional measurement of capillary and arteriovenous anastomotic blood flow in the human finger by laser-Doppler-flowmeter. Eur J Appl Physiol 57:616-621, 1988.
28. Bini G, Hagbarth K, Hynninen P, Wallin BG: Thermoregulatory and rhythm-generating mechanisms governing the sudomotor and vasoconstrictor outflow in human cutaneous nerves. J Physiol (Lond) 306:537-552, 1980.
29. Bini G, Hagbarth K, Hynninen P, Wallin BG: Thermoregulatory and rhythm-generating mechanisms governing the sudomotor and vasoconstrictor outflow in human cutaneous nerves. J Physiol (Lond) 306:537-552, 1980.
30. Hynson JM, Sessler DI, Moayeri A, McGuire J: Absence of non-shivering thermogenesis in anesthetized humans. ANESTHESIOLOGY 79:695-703, 1993.
31. Nadel ER, Metchell JW, Stolwijk JAJ: Control of local and total sweating during exercise transients. Int J Biometeorol 15:201-206, 1971.
32. Cheng C, Matsukawa T, Sessler DI, Kurz A, Merrifield B, Lin H, Olofsson P: Increasing mean skin temperature linearly reduces the core-temperature thresholds for vasoconstriction and shivering thresholds in humans. ANESTHESIOLOGY 82:1160-1168, 1995.
33. Bruck K: Thermoregulation: Control mechanisms and neural processes, Temperature Regulation and Energy Metabolism in the Newborn. Edited by Sinclair JC. New York, Grune & Stratton, 1978, pp 157-185.
34. Hales JRS: Skin arteriovenous anastomoses, their control and role in thermoregulation, Cardiovascular Shunts: Phylogenetic, Ontogenetic and Clinical Aspects. Edited by Johansen K, Burggren W. Copenhagen, Munksgaard, 1985, pp 433-451.
35. Nagasaka T, Hirata K, Nunomura T, Cabanac M: The effect of local heating on blood flow in the finger and the forearm skin. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 65:1329-1332, 1987.
36. Lindblad LE, Ekenvall L, Klingstedt C: Neural regulation of vascular tone and cold induced vasoconstriction in human finger skin. J Autonom Nerv Syst 30:169-173, 1990.
37. Hales JRS, Jessen C, Fawcett AA, King RB: Skin AVA and capillary dilatation and constriction induced by local skin heating. Pflugers Arch 404:203-207, 1985.
38. Johnson JM, Brengelmann GL, Hales JRS, Vanhoutte PM, Wenger CB: Regulation of the cutaneous circulation. Fed Proc 45:2841-2850, 1986.
39. Hales JRS, Fawcett AA, Bennett JW, Needham AD: Thermal control of blood flow through capillaries and arteriovenous anastomoses in skin of sheep. Pflugers Arch 378:55-63, 1978.
40. Roe CF: Effect of bowel exposure on body temperature during surgical operations. Am J Surg 122:13-15, 1971.
41. Sessler DI: Consequences and treatment of perioperative hypothermia. Anesth Clin North Am 12:425-456, 1994.
42. Sessler DI, Olofsson CI, Rubinstein EH, Beebe JJ: The thermoregulatory threshold in humans during halothane anesthesia. ANESTHESIOLOGY 68:836-842, 1988.
43. Matsukawa T, Kurz A, Sessler DI, Bjorksten AR, Merrifield B, Cheng C: Propofol linearly reduces the vasoconstriction and shivering thresholds. ANESTHESIOLOGY 82:1169-1180, 1995.
44. Sessler DI, Moayeri A, Stoen R, Glosten B, Hynson J, McGuire J: Thermoregulatory vasoconstriction decreases cutaneous heat loss. ANESTHESIOLOGY 73:656-660, 1990.
45. Herdman SJ: Recovery of shivering in spinal cats. Exp Neurol 59:177-189, 1978.
46. Fuller CA, Horwitz BA, Horowitz JM: Shivering and nonshivering thermogenic responses of cold-exposed rats to hypothalamic warming. Am J Physiol 228:1519-1524, 1975.
47. Klussmann FW: Energy production of rabbits before and after transection of both ventro-lateral funiculi of the spinal cord. J Therm Biol 8:133-135, 1983.
48. Wenger CB, Roberts MF, Stolwijk JJA, Nadel ER: Forearm blood flow during body temperature transients produced by leg exercise. J Appl Physiol 38:58-63, 1975.
This article has been cited 24 time(s).
Clinical Physiology and Functional ImagingForearm-finger skin temperature gradient as an index of cutaneous perfusion during steady-state exerciseClinical Physiology and Functional Imaging
Clinics in Plastic SurgeryHypothermia and Hyperthermia in the Ambulatory Surgical PatientClinics in Plastic Surgery
Anesthesia and AnalgesiaThe effects of epidural and general anesthesia on tissue oxygenationAnesthesia and Analgesia
Anesthesia and AnalgesiaHypercapnia improves tissue oxygenation in morbidly obese surgical patientsAnesthesia and Analgesia
Anesthesia and Analgesia
Thermoregulatory vasodilation increases the venous partial pressure of oxygen
Anesthesia and Analgesia, 85(3):
Anesthesia and Analgesia
The nonimmobilizer 1,2-dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane does not affect thermoregulation in the rat
Anesthesia and Analgesia, 91(4):
Physics in Medicine and BiologyA model to predict patient temperature during cardiac surgeryPhysics in Medicine and Biology
European Journal of Applied PhysiologySkin-temperature gradients are a validated measure of fingertip perfusionEuropean Journal of Applied Physiology
Perioperative thermoregulation and heat balance
Anesthesia and AnalgesiaDantrolene reduces the threshold and gain for shiveringAnesthesia and Analgesia
Critical CareMeperidine and skin surface warming additively reduce the shivering threshold: a volunteer studyCritical Care
British Journal of Anaesthesia
Thermoregulation, mild perioperative hypothermia and postanaesthetic shivering
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 84(5):
Anesthesia and Analgesia
The threshold and gain of thermoregulatory vasoconstriction differs during anesthesia in the dependent and upper arms in the lateral position
Anesthesia and Analgesia, 94(4):
Intensive Care MedicineNoninvasive monitoring of peripheral perfusionIntensive Care Medicine
Intraoperative heat conservation: A bunch of hot air?
New England Journal of Medicine
Mild perioperative hypothermia
New England Journal of Medicine, 336():
StrokeDefeating Normal Thermoregulatory Defenses Induction of Therapeutic HypothermiaStroke
Anesthesia and Analgesia
Clonidine increases the sweating threshold, but does not reduce the gain of sweating
Anesthesia and Analgesia, 83(4):
A comparative review of the newer inhalational anaesthetics
CNS Drugs, 10(4):
AnesthesiologyTemperature Monitoring and Perioperative ThermoregulationAnesthesiology
© 1995 American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc.
Publication of an advertisement in Anesthesiology Online does not constitute endorsement by the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc. or Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. of the product or service being advertised.