Skip Navigation LinksHome > November 2014 - Volume 121 - Issue 5 > Prehabilitation versus Rehabilitation: A Randomized Control...
Anesthesiology:
doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000393
Perioperative Medicine: Clinical Science

Prehabilitation versus Rehabilitation: A Randomized Control Trial in Patients Undergoing Colorectal Resection for Cancer

Gillis, Chelsia R.D., M.Sc.; Li, Chao M.D., M.Sc.; Lee, Lawrence M.D., M.Sc.; Awasthi, Rashami B.Sc.; Augustin, Berson B.Sc.; Gamsa, Ann Ph.D.; Liberman, A. Sender M.D.; Stein, Barry M.D.; Charlebois, Patrick M.D.; Feldman, Liane S. M.D.; Carli, Francesco M.D., M.Phil.

Press Release
Collapse Box

Abstract

Background: The preoperative period (prehabilitation) may represent a more appropriate time than the postoperative period to implement an intervention. The impact of prehabilitation on recovery of function al exercise capacity was thus studied in patients undergoing colorectal resection for cancer.
Methods: A parallel-arm single-blind superiority randomized controlled trial was conducted. Seventy-seven patients were randomized to receive either prehabilitation (n = 38) or rehabilitation (n = 39). Both groups received a home-based intervention of moderate aerobic and resistance exercises, nutritional counseling with protein supplementation, and relaxation exercises initiated either 4 weeks before surgery (prehabilitation) or immediately after surgery (rehabilitation), and continued for 8 weeks after surgery. Patients were managed with an enhanced recovery pathway. Primary outcome was functional exercise capacity measured using the validated 6-min walk test.
Results: Median duration of prehabilitation was 24.5 days. While awaiting surgery, functional walking capacity increased (≥20 m) in a higher proportion of the prehabilitation group compared with the rehabilitation group (53 vs. 15%, adjusted P = 0.006). Complication rates and duration of hospital stay were similar. The difference between baseline and 8-week 6-min walking test was significantly higher in the prehabilitation compared with the rehabilitation group (+23.7 m [SD, 54.8] vs. −21.8 m [SD, 80.7]; mean difference 45.4 m [95% CI, 13.9 to 77.0]). A higher proportion of the prehabilitation group were also recovered to or above baseline exercise capacity at 8 weeks compared with the rehabilitation group (84 vs. 62%, adjusted P = 0.049).
Conclusion: Meaningful changes in postoperative functional exercise capacity can be achieved with a prehabilitation program.

© 2014 American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc.

Publication of an advertisement in Anesthesiology Online does not constitute endorsement by the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc. or Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. of the product or service being advertised.
Login

Article Tools

Share