Share this article on:

A Platelet Activating Factor Receptor Antagonist Inhibits Cytokine Production in Human Whole Blood by Bacterial Toxins and Live Bacteria

Ogata, Masanori MD; Nandate, Koichiroh MD; Kawasaki, Takashi MD; Kawasaki, Chika MD; Ozaki, Masayuki MD; Shigematsu, Akio MD

doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000112310.93297.AF
EDITORIAL: Editorial

We previously reported that a platelet-activating factor receptor (PAFR) antagonist (TCV-309) suppressed lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced mortality and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) production in mice. However, the effect of TCV-309 on cytokine production induced by Staphylococcus enterotoxin B (SEB) or live bacteria has not been reported. In this study we investigated the effect of TCV-309 on cytokine production in human whole blood induced by LPS, SEB, and both Gram-positive and -negative bacteria. Human whole blood diluted 5:1 (980 μL) was placed in the wells of a 24-well plate. Ten microliters of LPS, SEB, Escherichia coli O18 K+, or Staphylococcus aureus were added to each well. After incubation at 37°C for 6 h, TNF, interleukin (IL)-6, and IL-8 in the culture medium were measured. TCV-309 did not affect the growth of either E. coli or S. aureus bacteria in the culture medium for the 6 h incubation. LPS, SEB, and both E. coli and S. aureus induced TNF, IL-6, and IL-8 in human whole blood. TCV-309 significantly inhibited the production of TNF, IL-6, and IL-8 induced by LPS, SEB, and bacteria. A PAFR antagonist suppressed cytokine production induced by LPS, SEB, and both Gram-positive and -negative bacteria in human whole blood. A PAFR plays an important role of producing proinflammatory cytokines induced by both toxins and live bacteria.

IMPLICATIONS: The platelet-activating factor receptor plays an important role in producing proinflammatory cytokines induced by bacterial toxins, such as lipopolysaccharide, Staphylococcus enterotoxin B, and live Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria.

From the Department of Anesthesiology, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan

Supported, in part, by departmental funding and a grant-in-aid for scientific research [(B) (2)14370499, 15659431] from the Ministry of Education, and Culture of Japan.

Accepted for publication November 26, 2003.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Masanori Ogata, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, 1–1 Iseigaoka, Yahatanishiku, Kitaky-ushu 807–8555, Japan. Address email to mogata@med.uoeh-u.ac.jp.

Annually, more than half a million people in the United States develop sepsis, and the mortality rate is approximately 30% (1). Both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria evoke a state of shock that is characterized by cardiovascular collapse, multiple organ failure, and frequent mortality. Approximately 50% of all cases of septic shock are associated with Gram-positive bacteria (2,3).

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF), interleukin (IL)-8, and IL-6 have been implicated as important mediators of the lethal effect of bacterial infection. Lipopolysaccha-ride (LPS) induces proinflammatory cytokines, as do other components of the bacterial cell wall, such as peptidoglycans. Staphylococcal enterotoxins (SE) and toxic shock syndrome 1 are well-known enterotoxins produced by Gram-positive bacilli. These toxins function as superantigens that activate T cells, monocytes, and macrophages without the internalization and pro-teolysis required by conventional antigens, and result in the synthesis of a variety of cytokines, such as TNF, IL-2, IL-6, and IL-8 (4–6).

We previously reported that a novel platelet-activating factor receptor (PAFR) antagonist (TCV-309) suppressed LPS-induced mortality and TNF production in mice (7). It has been reported that PAFR antagonists failed to improve the clinical outcome in patients with severe sepsis (8). Therefore, we wondered whether PAFR antagonists substantially inhibit the cytokine production induced in human whole blood by bacterial toxins or live bacteria. There are no reports on the effects of PAFR antagonists on the induction of cytokine production by live bacteria or bacterial toxins, such as SEB.

This study investigated the effect of TCV-309 on the induction of cytokine production in human whole blood by bacterial toxins, such as LPS and SEB, and live bacteria, such as E. coli O18K+ and S. aureus.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Methods

Phenol-extracted Escherichia coli (0127: B8) LPS was purchased from Difco Laboratories (Detroit, MI). Recombinant human TNF-α was purchased from Gen-zyme CO (Cambridge, MA). TCV-309, a selective PAFR antagonist, was a kind gift from Takeda Pha-maceutical CO, Osaka, Japan.

E. coli O18 K+, a smooth encapsulated strain, and S. aureus were provided by S. Warren. One day before the experiments, one colony of each bacterium was inoculated in trypticase soy broth (TSB), and incubated overnight at 37°C. The next day, log-phase growth of the bacteria was initiated by adding additional TSB and incubating the culture for an additional 2.5 h, until reaching an OD550 of 0.8. The bacteria were then washed twice and suspended in normal saline. The appropriate concentration of bacteria for inoculation was obtained by diluting the suspension in saline until obtaining a spectrophotometric reading that corresponded to the necessary number of colony-forming units per milliliter based on a standard curve.

After approval from our Human Investigation Committee, informed consent was obtained from seven healthy male volunteers who were not taking any medication. Blood samples were drawn into tubes containing heparin and diluted with 5 volumes of Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640 (Nissui Pharmaceutical, Tokyo, Japan) (9). The diluted blood (980 μL per well) was placed in 24-well tissue culture plates (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ).

After adding different doses (0–10 μM) of TCV-309 to each well, the whole blood was stimulated with LPS, SEB, or bacteria (105/mL). Then, the blood was incubated for 6 h at 37°C in a 95% air/5% CO2 incubator. After incubation, the blood was centrifuged at 700 g for 10 min to remove blood cells and bacteria. Supernatant samples were collected and stored at −80°C until assayed. For selected experiments, aliquots were removed, serially diluted, and plated overnight at 37°C on soybean casein digest agar. Bacterial viability was measured as the number of colony-forming units on the plates.

The L929 cell cytotoxic assay was used to determine the plasma TNF-α activity, as described previously (10). Briefly, L929 cells in RPMI 1640 medium containing 5% fetal calf serum (FCS) were seeded at 3 × 105 cells/well in 96-well flat-bottomed microtiter plates (Becton Dickinson) and incubated overnight at 37°C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 in air. Serial 1:2 dilutions of samples were made in the just-described medium containing 1 mg/mL actinomycin D (Banyu Pharmaceutical, Tokyo, Japan), and 0.1 mL of each dilution was added to different wells. The next day, cell survival was assessed by fixing and staining the cells with crystal violet (0.2% in 20% methanol), and 1% sodium dodecyl sulfate was added to each well to solubilize the stained cells. The absorbance of each well was determined at 490 nm using a microplate reader (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Richmond, CA). TNF activity was expressed in units per milliliter, which is the reciprocal of the dilution necessary for 50% lysis of the cells.

The plasma IL-6 concentration was measured in duplicate using a commercially available enzyme-linked immunoassay (IL-6 Enzyme Immunoassay Kit; Advanced Magnetics, Cambridge, MA). The intra- and in-terassay precision was 9 and 6%, respectively, at an IL-6 concentration of 88 pg/mL. The plasma IL-8 concentration was measured in duplicate using an enzyme-linked immunoassay (IL-8 Enzyme Immunoassay Kit, Advanced Magnetics). The intra- and interassay precision was 7% and 4%, respectively, at an IL-8 concentration of 76 pg/mL. According to the manufacturer, cross-reactivity with other cytokines is negligible in both assays.

To assess the effect of TCV-309 on leukocyte viability, different doses (0–10 μM) of TCV-309 were added to diluted human whole blood and incubated for 6 h at 37°C in a 95% air/5% CO2 incubator. After incubation, the blood was centrifuged at 700 g for 10 min. Buffy coats were isolated and the red blood cells were lysed with NH4Cl. The white blood cells were resuspended in RPMI 1640 medium containing 5% FCS and the cells were stained with 0.2% trypan blue. The cell survival rate was assessed under a microscope.

All data are presented as the mean ± SEM. The paired Student's t-test was used to compare values with the control value. A significant difference was presumed for P < 0.05.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Results

In a preliminary experiment, whole blood was stimulated using different doses of LPS and SEB. As shown in Figure 1, the TNF production plateaued at LPS and SEB concentrations exceeding 10 ng/mL and 10 μg/mL, respectively, for a 6-h incubation. Therefore, we used these concentrations as the stimulatory concentrations of LPS and SEB in this study. After adding different doses of TCV-309, whole blood was stimulated with LPS (10 ng/mL) for 6 h. Figure 2 shows the effect of TCV-309 on LPS-induced cytokine production. At doses of 2.5 μM and larger, TCV-309 significantly inhibited LPS-induced TNF production as compared with the control. LPS-induced IL-6 and IL-8 production was suppressed at doses of 5 and 10 μM and larger, respectively. Leukocyte viability was not influenced by the dose (0~10 μM) of TCV-309.

Figure 1

Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 2

The SEB-induced cytokine production is shown in Figure 3. After adding different doses of TCV-309, whole blood was stimulated with SEB (10 μg/mL) for 6 h. Doses of 1.25, 5, 10 μM and larger of TCV-309 inhibited SEB-induced production of TNF, IL-6, and IL-8, respectively, in comparison with the control.

Figure 3

Figure 3

The diluted human whole blood was stimulated with mid-log phase growing E. coli 018 K+ or S. aureus at a concentration of 105/mL. The concentrations of both E. coli O18 K+ and S. aureus increased to approximately 107/mL in whole blood with TCV-309 (0–10 μM) for a 6-h incubation (data not shown). The TCV-309 did not affect the growth of either bacterium.

After adding different doses of TCV-309, the whole blood was stimulated with E. coli (105/mL) for 6 h. Figure 4 shows the effect of TCV-309 on cytokine production induced by E. coli O18 K+. When the blood was incubated for 6 h, E. coli O18 K+ induced TNF (2560 ± 570 U/mL), IL-6 (234 ± 50 pg/mL), and IL-8 (1175 ± 48 pg/mL). At TCV-309 concentrations of 1.25 μM and larger, the induction of TNF by E. coli O18 K+ was inhibited significantly. IL-8 and IL-6 were inhibited at TCV-309 concentrations of 2.5 and 10 μM and larger, respectively.

Figure 4

Figure 4

After adding different doses of TCV-309, whole blood was stimulated with S. aureus for 6 h (Fig. 5). S. aureus induced TNF (846 ± 130 U/mL), IL-6 (203 ± 38 pg/mL), and IL-8 (505 ± 110 pg/mL). TCV-309 concentrations of 1.25 μM and larger inhibited the induction of TNF and IL-8 by S. aureus, whereas IL-6 was suppressed at concentrations of 2.5 μM and larger.

Figure 5

Figure 5

Back to Top | Article Outline

Discussion

This study demonstrated that a PAFR antagonist (TCV-309) significantly suppressed the production of inflammatory cytokines (TNF, IL-6, and IL-8) induced in human whole blood by LPS, SEB, and live E. coli O18 K+ and S. aureus.

Several studies have shown that PAFR antagonists suppress the LPS-induced production of TNF, super-oxide, and nitric oxide in vitro (11–13). Previously, we reported that TCV-309 inhibited the increase of serum TNF levels and mortality induced by LPS in mice (7). In this study, we showed that a PAFR antagonist (TCV-309) suppressed the production of TNF, IL-6, and IL-8 induced by LPS, SEB, E. coli O18 K+, and S. aureus. By contrast, Cauwels et al. (14) reported that a PAFR antagonist (L659,989) had no effect on the cytokine production induced by LPS and or Streptococcus pneumonia in human whole blood. We postulate that differences in the PAFR antagonist and bacteria caused the different results.

The mechanism by which the PAFR antagonist inhibits LPS-induced cytokine production is not known. It has been reported that PAFR antagonists inhibit LPS-induced TNF mRNA expression (15). The effect of a platelet-activating factor (PAF) depends on the intracellular calcium concentration. Inhibition of the calcium flux attenuates the effects of PAF on LPS-stimulated macrophages (16). Naka-mura et al. (17) reported that LPS transduces calcium ion signaling via a PAFR using cloned PAF receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes and Chinese hamster ovary cells. Ishii et al. (18) reported that PAFR−/− mice failed to acquire resistance to endotoxin in comparison with PAFR+/+ mice. Endotoxin induced macrophages from PAFR−/− mice to produce TNF and IL-6 to the same extent as in those from wild-type mice. These results suggest that the PAFR is not an LPS receptor but plays an important role in LPS-induced transcriptional change and calcium ion signaling.

SEB functions as a superantigen and has the ability to activate T cells, binding major histocompatibility complex class II receptors, such as those on monocytes, and the T-cell receptor of T lymphocytes expressing specific Vβ chains (4). Ours is the first report that a PAFR antagonist (TCV-309) suppresses SEB-induced cytokine production in human whole blood. One study demonstrated that SEB induced TNF-α production in T cells, but not in monocytes, and that protein kinase C activation plays a critical role in this (19). We have not studied the mechanism by which PAFR antagonists inhibit SEB-induced cytokine production. Further studies are needed to answer this question.

The PAFR exists in platelets, neutrophils, monocytes, macrophages, and endothelial cells (18,20). The PAFR is a member of the G-protein-coupled receptor superfamily, which is characterized by seven trans-membrane domains. Activation of the PAFR leads to the activation of several signal-transduction pathways (21,22). Our data demonstrated that the PAFR on the cell membrane interacts with both toxins, such as LPS and SEB, and with bacteria, such as E. coli O18 K+and S. aureus, to induce inflammatory signal transduction. It has been reported that PAF itself activates NF-κB, inducing cytokine production and PAFR expression (23,24). Recently, Pacheco et al. (25) reported that LPS-induced lipid body formation was inhibited by a PAFR antagonist, suggesting a role for endogenous PAF. We postulate that PAFR antagonists block the biological effects of endogenous PAF induced by bacteria or bacterial toxins. Therefore, PAFR antagonists may attenuate the synergism between endogenous PAF and bacterial toxins, ultimately inhibiting inflammatory cytokine signal transduction.

Our study demonstrated that PAFR antagonists suppress the induction of proinflammatory cytokines in human whole blood by bacterial toxins or live bacteria. However, the PAFR antagonist did not influence bacterial growth in our study. It has been reported that the PAFR is important for phagocytosis and bacterial anchoring to human cells (26–29). Recently, it was found that Klebsiella pneumonia induced lethality in PAFR-deficient mice earlier than in wild-type control mice, suggesting that PAF plays a protective role during infection (30). The inhibition of bacterial phagocytosis and killing may be one of the mechanisms that prevent PAFR antagonists from improving the clinical outcome in septic patients. Further study is needed to evaluate this hypothesis.

In conclusion, we found that a PAFR antagonist (TCV-309) inhibited the induction of cytokine production in human whole blood not only by bacterial toxins, such as LPS and SEB, but also by live bacteria, such as E. coli O18 K+ and S. aureus, suggesting that PAFR is engaged in cytokine signal transduction induced by both toxins and live bacteria.

Back to Top | Article Outline

References

1. Sessler CN, Shepherd W. New concepts in sepsis. Curr Opin Crit Care 2002;8:465–72.
2. Hotchkiss RS, Karl IE. The pathophysiology and treatment of sepsis. N Engl J Med 2003;348:138–50.
3. Cohen J. The immunopathogenesis of sepsis. Nature 2002;420:885–91.
4. Kappler J, Kotzin B, Herron L, et al. V beta-specific stimulation of human T cells by staphylococcal toxins. Science 1989;244:811–3.
5. Imanishi K, Inada K, Akatsuka H, et al. Tumor necrosis factor production by human T-cells stimulated with bacterial superantigens. Int J Immunopharmacol 1995;17:841–8.
6. Kawasaki C, Kawasaki T, Ogata M, et al. Ketamine isomers suppress superantigen-induced proinflammatory cytokine production in human whole blood. Can J Anaesth 2001;48:819–23.
7. Ogata M, Matsumoto T, Koga K, et al. An antagonist of platelet-activating factor suppresses endotoxin-induced tumor necrosis factor and mortality in mice pretreated with carrageenan. Infect Immun 1993;61:699–704.
8. Suputtamongkol Y, Intaranongpai S, Smith MD, et al. A double-blind placebo-controlled study of an infusion of lexipafant (Platelet-activating factor receptor antagonist) in patients with severe sepsis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother 2000;44:693–6.
9. Ogata M, Fletcher MF, Kloczewiak M, et al. Effect of anticoagulants on binding and neutralization of lipopolysaccharide by the peptide immunoglobulin conjugate CAP18(106–138)-immunoglobulin G in whole blood. Infect Immun 1997;65:2160–7.
10. Ogata M, Matsui T, Kita T, et al. Carrageenan primes leukocytes to enhance lipopolysaccharide-induced tumor necrosis factor alpha production. Infect Immun 1999;67:3284–9.
11. Kruse EK, Albert DH, Summers JB, et al. Attenuation of endotoxin-induced pathophysiology by a new potent PAF receptor antagonist. Shock 1996;5:265–73.
12. Arthur JF, Shahin S, Dusting GJ. PAF antagonists block induction of nitric oxide synthase in cultured macrophages and vascular smooth muscle cells. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 1995;22:452–4.
13. Zhang F, Decker K. Platelet-activating factor antagonists suppress the generation of tumor necrosis factor-alpha and super-oxide induced by lipopolysaccharide or phorbol ester in rat liver macrophages. Eur Cytokine Netw 1994;5:311–7.
14. Cauwels A, Wan E, Leismann M, et al. Coexistence of CD14-dependent and independent pathways for stimulation of human monocytes by gram-positive bacteria. Infect Immun 1997;65:3255–60.
15. Lo CJ, Cryer HG, Fu M, et al. Endotoxin-induced macrophage gene expression depends on platelet-activating factor. Arch Surg 1997;132:1342–7.
16. Asmis R, Randriamampita C, Tsien RY, et al. Intracellular Ca2+, inositol 1, 4, 5-trisphosphate and additional signalling in the stimulation by platelet-activating factor of prostaglandin E2 formation in P388D1 macrophage-like cells. Biochem J 1994;298 Pt 3:543–51.
17. Nakamura M, Honda Z, Waga I, et al. Endotoxin transduces Ca2+ signaling via platelet-activating factor receptor. FEBS Lett 1992;314:125–9.
18. Ishii S, Nakamura M, Waga I, et al. Cloning and characterization of a murine platelet-activating factor receptor gene. Adv Exp Med Biol 1997;407:347–55.
19. Yan Z, Yang DC, Neill R, et al. Production of tumor necrosis factor alpha in human T lymphocytes by staphylococcal enterotoxin B correlates with toxin-induced proliferation and is regulated through protein kinase C. Infect Immun 1999;67:6611–8.
20. Ahmed A, Dearn S, Shams M, et al. Localization, quantification, and activation of platelet-activating factor receptor in human endometrium during the menstrual cycle: PAF stimulates NO, VEGF, and FAKpp125. FASEB J 1998;12:831–3.
21. De Plaen IG, Tan XD, Chang H, et al. Lipopolysaccharide activates nuclear factor kappa B in rat intestine: role of endogenous platelet-activating factor and tumor necrosis factor. Br J Pharmacol 2000;129:307–14.
22. Denault S, April MJ, Stankova J. Transcriptional activation of the interleukin-8 gene by platelet- activating factor in human peripheral blood monocytes. Immunology 1997;91:297–302.
23. Im SY, Han SJ, Ko HM, et al. Involvement of nuclear factor-kappa B in platelet-activating factor-mediated tumor necrosis factor-alpha expression. Eur J Immunol 1997;27:2800–4.
24. Wang H, Tan X, Chang H, et al. Regulation of platelet-activating factor receptor gene expression in vivo by endotoxin, platelet-activating factor and endogenous tumour necrosis factor. Biochem J 1997;322:603–8.
25. Pacheco P, Bozza FA, Gomes RN, et al. Lipopolysaccharide-induced leukocyte lipid body formation in vivo: innate immunity elicited intracellular Loci involved in eicosanoid metabolism. J Immunol 2002;169:6498–506.
26. Cundell DR, Gerard C, Idanpaan-Heikkila I, et al. PAF receptor anchors Streptococcus pneumoniae to activated human endothelial cells. Adv Exp Med Biol 1996;416:89–94.
27. Cundell DR, Gerard NP, Gerard C, et al. Streptococcus pneumoniae anchor to activated human cells by the receptor for platelet-activating factor. Nature 1995;377:435–8.
28. Owaki T, Meneshian A, Maemura K, et al. Endothelial cells potentiate phagocytic killing by macrophages via platelet-activating factor release. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2000;278:H269–76.
29. Bussolino F, Fischer E, Turrini F, et al. Platelet-activating factor enhances complement-dependent phagocytosis of diamide-treated erythrocytes by human monocytes through activation of protein kinase C and phosphorylation of complement receptor type one (CR1). J Biol Chem 1989;264:21711–9.
30. Soares AC, Pinho VS, Souza DG, et al. Role of the platelet-activating factor (PAF) receptor during pulmonary infection with gram negative bacteria. Br J Pharmacol 2002;137:621–8.
© 2004 International Anesthesia Research Society