Share this article on:

Women, Minorities, and Leadership in Anesthesiology: Take the Pledge

Leslie, Kate MBBS, MD, MEpid, MHlthServMt, FANZCA, FAHMS*†‡§; Hopf, Harriet W. MD, FUHM‖¶; Houston, Patricia MD, MEd, FRCPC#; O’Sullivan, Ellen MBBCh, BAO FCAI, FRCA, FCPSP(Hon)**††

doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001967
Editorials: Editorial

From the *Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; Anaesthesia, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine Unit, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; §Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Departments of Anesthesiology and Bioengineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City; #Department of Anesthesia, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada; **Department of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care, and Pain, St. James’ Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; and ††Department of Anaesthesia, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland

Accepted for publication January 9, 2017.

Funding: None.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Reprints will not be available from the authors.

Address correspondence to Kate Leslie, MBBS, MD, MEpid, MHlthServMt, FANZCA, FAHMS, Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, 3050, Australia. Address e-mail to kate.leslie@mh.org.au.

Diversity in the workforce is associated with improved organizational performance in the corporate world1 and is considered vital to improving outcomes in health care.2 Although diversity has increased in medical schools and residency programs in the United States, the “pipeline” to senior academic positions in American universities for women and members of underrepresented minorities is “leaky,” with few women or minority members reaching the top.3 This parlous situation applies to academic positions in anesthesiology as well.4 However, it is unclear whether this block in the leadership pipeline applies only to academia.

In this edition of the Journal, Toledo et al5 report on a survey about diversity in the leadership group of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA), a member-based organization dedicated to education, research, and advocacy. A total of 595 house of delegates members and state society officers were surveyed, with a response rate of 54%. Fewer women (21.1%) were members of the ASA house of delegates or were state society officers, than were members of the national medical workforce (38.0%) or national population (51.0%), although the percentage of women was similar to the ASA membership (23.0%) and the national anesthesia workforce (24.8%). Underrepresented minorities comprised 6.0% of the ASA leadership, 8.6% of the anesthesia workforce, 8.9% of the national medical workforce, and 32% of the national population (the ASA does not collect racial/ethnic information on its members). Toledo et al5 concluded that “Efforts should be made to increase the diversity of the ASA leadership with the goal to reducing overall anesthesia workforce disparities.” In other words, the leadership should model gender and racial diversity rather than just reflect it. We applaud this suggestion.

The purpose of this editorial is to put the results of Toledo et al’s survey into an international context and to suggest solutions. We take a broad view on leadership, considering it to include many visible and influential roles, such as elected office in a member-based organization; tenure in the higher ranks of an academic institution; a management role in an anesthesia group or health care facility; prominence in conducting, reviewing, and speaking about research; as a champion for quality and safety; and in educational leadership roles. Our main focus is on gender diversity because each nation has a unique mix of indigenous and immigrant people, and data on race/ethnicity are not uniformly collected or reported.

The participation of women in medical and anesthesia education, and in leadership, is similar in the United States and 5 comparable nations (Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom) (Table). The percentage of women in primary medical education is 47% to 55% in these countries. However, anesthesiology recruits a smaller proportion of women than the proportion that graduates from medical school (37%–48%). Few women reach the rank of professor or become department chairs (6%–17%), or are elected to the boards of representative anesthesia organizations (13%–36%). So the leadership pipeline is blocked internationally. What can be done to improve this situation?

Table

Table

Our suggestions for change are a modification of the work of Jennifer L. Martin,6 who proposed “Ten simple rules to achieve conference speaker gender balance” after a basic science conference published a program without a female keynote speaker. Lack of female keynote speakers has been noted at major anesthesiology meetings as well,7 and at least one organizing committee in Australia has adopted Martin’s rules to remedy the problem.8 Similarly, a major grant body in the United Kingdom now requires applicants to demonstrate employment practices that promote women in science.9 These rules for increasing participation in anesthesiology leadership are:

  1. Collect the data: Collect gender and minority status data, not only on the general membership of the organization, but also on members who stand for election and who are elected to the governance bodies of the organization.
  2. Develop a policy: Develop a policy regarding gender and minority balance in the governance structure of the organization. Depending on the context, it may be important to recognize the profound underrepresentation of women from underrepresented minorities.10 This policy will need to include contingencies (such as co-option) for situations when insufficient women apply for or are elected to the office. This may be complex where component groups make individual choices in silos, as the component societies of the ASA do. Goal-setting has also been shown to be effective.1
  3. Make the policy visible: Make the policy publicly available but also provide links to it from committee membership pages and make sure that all office bearers are aware of it. Consider providing training to office bearers to help them understand why the policy is necessary, particularly how unconscious bias can influence decision-making about leadership.11,12
  4. Establish an informed and balanced recruitment advisory group: Deliberative, rather than reflexive, identification of candidates increases diversity.11 Therefore, establish a diverse group who can identify suitable women and members of underrepresented minorities to mentor and sponsor. Members are often encouraged to stand for office by people on the leadership team. If this team does not include women and members of unrepresented minorities, then the result will be continued lack of diversity. Commitment by men to increased participation of women in leadership is crucial.13
  5. Report the data: Report on the gender and minority balance in the membership overall and among the office bearers in the regular reporting of the organization to its members, jurisdictions, and the public. Highlight and celebrate advances in representation in publications and online.
  6. Build and use databases: Compile a list of women with a track record or potential for leadership. The group that compiles and updates this list should be as diverse as possible and may overlap with the recruitment advisory group.14
  7. Respond to resistance: Expect resistance from women and men alike. Respond by highlighting that gender and minority diversity is not inconsistent with high-quality governance because of the large number of eligible and qualified candidates.
  8. Support female and minority office bearers: Provide mentorship to female and minority office bearers in addition to the leadership and cultural competence training offered to all members of the team. Consider the ecosystem of the role: if it was designed for a male leader (whether consciously or unconsciously), consider a redesign.
  9. Be family-friendly: For leaders with primary responsibility for children or older relatives, the timing and location of committee meetings can be problematic. Perhaps it is time to radically rethink the need to leave home for large national meetings and for teleconferences during peak family times. Availability of childcare at meetings may also promote participation.
  10. Take the pledge: Whatever your gender or minority status, when thinking about standing for office, ask for the policy and the data and see whether this is an organization that takes diversity seriously. If it is not, then you have a choice—reconsider your involvement or seek election and change the organization from within. We strongly recommend the latter.

Although our suggestions for change relate to diversity of elected office bearers, because this was the focus of Toledo et al’s study, they may and should be applied to other leadership roles to ensure the inclusion of women and minorities in the leadership of our profession.

Back to Top | Article Outline

DISCLOSURES

Name: Kate Leslie, MBBS, MD, MEpid, MHlthServMt, FANZCA.

Contribution: This author helped write the manuscript.

Name: Harriet W. Hopf, MD, FUHM.

Contribution: This author helped write the manuscript.

Name: Patricia Houston, MD, MEd, FRCPC.

Contribution: This author helped write the manuscript.

Name: Ellen O’Sullivan, MBBCh, BAO FCAI, FRCA, FCPSP(Hon).

Contribution: This author helped write the manuscript.

This manuscript was handled by: Nancy Borkowski, DBA, CPA, FACHE, FHFMA.

Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES

1. McKinsey & Company. Women in the Workplace. Available at https://womenintheworkplace.com. Accessed January 3, 2017.
2. Cohen JJ, Gabriel BA, Terrell C. The case for diversity in the health care workforce. Health Aff. 2002;21:90–102.
3. Association of American Medical Colleges. The State of Women in Academic Medicine: the Pipeline and Pathways to Leadership 2013–2014. Available at https://www.aamc.org/members/gwims/statistics. Accessed January 3, 2017.
4. Wong CA, Stock MC. The status of women in academic anesthesiology: a progress report. Anesth Analg. 2008;107:178–184.
5. Toledo P, Duce L, Adams J, Ross VH, Thompson KM, Wong CA. Diversity in the American Society of Anesthesiologists leadership. Anesth Analg. 2017;124:1611–1616.
6. Martin JL. Ten simple rules to achieve conference speaker gender balance. PLoS Comput Biol. 2014;10:e1003903.
7. Modra LJ, Austin DE, Yong SA, Chambers EJ, Jones D. Female representation at Australasian specialty conferences. Med J Aust. 2016;204:385.
8. Effeney B, Phillips N, Sturgess D. Female representation at Australasian specialty conferences. Med J Aust. 2016;205:530.
9. Davies S. Letter Regarding Requirement for the Silver Award of the Athena Swan Charter for Women in Science for NIHR Funding. Available at http://www.medschools.ac.uk/SiteCollectionDocuments/Letter_from_Dame_Sally_Davies_-_Women_in_Science.pdf. Accessed January 3, 2017.
10. Harvard Business Review. Getting More Black Women into the C-Suite. Available at https://hbr.org/2016/07/getting-more-black-women-into-the-c-suite. Accessed January 3, 2017.
11. Carnes M, Devine PG, Baier Manwell L, et al. The effect of an intervention to break the gender bias habit for faculty at one institution: a cluster randomized, controlled trial. Acad Med2015;90:221–230.
12. Association of American Medical Colleges. What You Don’t Know: The Science of Unconscious Bias and What to do About it in the Search and Recruitment Process. Available at https://www.aamc.org/members/leadership/catalog/178420/unconscious_bias.html. Accessed January 3, 2017.
13. Harvard Business Review. The Men Who Mentor Women. Available at https://hbr.org/2016/12/the-men-who-mentor-women. Accessed January 3, 2017.
14. Page S. The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools, and Societies. 2008.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
© 2017 International Anesthesia Research Society