Skip Navigation LinksHome > February 2011 - Volume 112 - Issue 2 > Antiplatelet Drugs: A Review of Their Pharmacology and Mana...
Anesthesia & Analgesia:
doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e318203f38d
Cardiovascular Anesthesiology: Review Article

Antiplatelet Drugs: A Review of Their Pharmacology and Management in the Perioperative Period

Hall, Richard MD, FRCPC, FCCP*; Mazer, C. David MD, FRCPC†,‡

Free Access
Supplemental Author Material
Continued Medical Education
Continuing Medical Education
Article Outline
Collapse Box

Author Information

From the *Departments of Anesthesia, Medicine, Surgery, and Pharmacology, Dalhousie University/Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia; Keenan Research Center/Li Ka Shing Knowledge Translation Institute, Saint Michael's Hospital, Toronto; and Departments of Anesthesia and Physiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Conflict of Interest: See Disclosures at the end of the article.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to C. David Mazer, MD, FRCPC, Department of Anesthesia, St. Michael's Hospital, 30 Bond St., Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada. Address e-mail to mazerd@smh.ca.

Accepted October 1, 2010

Published ahead of print January 6, 2011

Collapse Box

Abstract

In the normal course of the delivery of care, anesthesiologists encounter many patients who are receiving drugs that affect platelet function as a fundamental part of primary and secondary management of atherosclerotic thrombotic disease. There are several antiplatelet drugs available for use in clinical practice and several under investigation. Aspirin and clopidogrel (alone and in combination) have been the most studied and have the most favorable risk-benefit profiles of drugs currently available. Prasugrel was recently approved for patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous interventions. Other drugs such as dipyridamole and cilostazol have not been as extensively investigated. There are several newer investigational drugs such as cangrelor and ticagrelor, but whether they confer significant additional benefits remains to be established. Management of patients who are receiving antiplatelet drugs during the perioperative period requires an understanding of the underlying pathology and rationale for their administration, pharmacology and pharmacokinetics, and drug interactions. Furthermore, the risk and benefit assessment of discontinuing or continuing these drugs should be made bearing in mind the proposed surgery and its inherent risk for bleeding complications as well as decisions relating to appropriate use of general or some form of regional anesthesia. In general, the safest approach to prevent thrombosis seems to be continuation of these drugs throughout the perioperative period except where concerns about perioperative bleeding outweigh those associated with the development of thrombotic occlusion. Knowledge of the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of antiplatelet drugs may allow practitioners to anticipate difficulties associated with drug withdrawal and administration in the perioperative period including the potential for drug interactions.

Anesthesiologists frequently encounter patients with atherothrombotic disease who are receiving drugs deliberately designed to impair the normal function of the coagulation system. The platelet is integral to the initiation of thrombosis.1 Drugs that affect platelet function are a fundamental part of primary and secondary management of atherosclerotic thrombotic disease.2 As reviewed in various guideline documents,3 authoritative reviews, and meta-analyses, the indications for the use of antiplatelet drugs in the management of thrombotic diseases include stroke,46 acute myocardial infarction (AMI),79 acute coronary syndrome (ACS),10,11 angina,12 percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI),1315 cardiac surgery,1620 primary2123 and secondary cardiovascular disease prevention,7,14,2326 peripheral vascular disease,2731 and thrombotic disorders such as atrial fibrillation.7,32 There are several antiplatelet drugs available for use in clinical practice and several under investigation (Fig. 1).33 Management of patients who are receiving antiplatelet drugs during the perioperative period requires an understanding of the underlying pathology and rationale for their administration, pharmacology and pharmacokinetics, and drug interactions. The risk versus benefit assessment of continuing or discontinuing these drugs should be made bearing in mind the proposed surgery and its inherent risk for bleeding or thrombotic complications as well as decisions relating to appropriate use of general or some form of regional anesthesia. Reports of late coronary and carotid artery stent occlusion, particularly in the perioperative period after discontinuation of an antiplatelet drug,34 have served to heighten concern about the perioperative management of these drugs. This review focuses on the perioperative use of some of the current and investigational drugs affecting platelet function (Table 1) by describing their pharmacology including pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and drug interactions of particular relevance, management in the perioperative period in light of the above reports, and areas where further research should occur. Where possible, suggestions are made about the perioperative management of these drugs for patients receiving general or regional anesthesia.

Figure 1
Figure 1
Image Tools
Table 1
Table 1
Image Tools
Back to Top | Article Outline

ANTIPLATELET DRUGS

Aspirin

Aspirin has a central role in the prevention of thromboembolic complications from atherosclerotic disease and is the leading therapeutic drug for this purpose.3,35

Back to Top | Article Outline
Pharmacokinetics

After oral administration, aspirin is rapidly absorbed from the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract with peak levels occurring approximately 30 to 40 minutes after ingestion.36 For the majority of patients, there does not seem to be any additional effect on platelet activity at doses >300 mg.37 Use of enteric-coated formulations may considerably delay the time to peak effect.38

Back to Top | Article Outline
Pharmacodynamics

The effect of aspirin on platelet function is to permanently inactivate a key platelet enzyme (cyclooxygenase [COX]).39 This effect can only be reversed by generation of new platelets40 thus permitting once-daily dosing. Conditions for which aspirin is indicated and its lowest effective dose are given in Table 2.35

Table 2
Table 2
Image Tools

COX exists in 2 isoforms (COX-1 and COX-241) and catalyzes the first step in prostanoid synthesis, the conversion of arachidonic acid to prostaglandin (PG)H2. PGH2 is rapidly converted to several bioactive prostanoids including thromboxane A2 (TXA2) and PGI2.41 Aspirin inhibits COX by diffusing into the COX channel within the membrane to the catalytic site for the enzyme (an arginine 120 residue, which is a common binding site for all COX inhibitors) and then acetylating a serine residue (serine 529 in human COX-1 and serine 516 in human COX-2). This prevents arachidonic acid from gaining access to the catalytic site of the enzyme.42

In response to various stimuli, platelets generate TXA2, a process that is very sensitive to inhibition by aspirin43 and largely mediated by COX-1. In contrast, the endothelium generates PGI2, a process that is much less sensitive to inhibition by aspirin and largely mediated by COX-2.35 As a consequence, low-dose aspirin has limited measurable effects on PGI2-dependent vascular functions including arterial blood pressure regulation,44 renal function,45 or interference with the antihypertensive effects of diuretics and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors.46 A daily dose of 30 mg aspirin is sufficient to completely suppress TXA2 production within 1 week.43

Back to Top | Article Outline
Adverse Effects

The major adverse effect of aspirin administration is an increased risk of bleeding complications,35,47 albeit with a very favorable risk-benefit ratio.47 One of the most common sites for bleeding is the GI tract,48 although this risk may be ameliorated by the use of gastroprotective drugs such as proton pump inhibitors (PPIs).49

Back to Top | Article Outline
Drug Interactions

The concomitant administration of nonselective reversible COX-1 inhibitors such as ibuprofen and naproxen may lead to impairment in the efficacy of aspirin.42,5053 There is competition between the nonselective COX inhibitors and aspirin for the common docking site within the COX-1 channel (arginine 120), which may prevent aspirin from acetylating the serine residue at position 529.42 Such an interaction could occur in the perioperative period when these drugs are often coadministered. Retrospective cohort studies have not demonstrated any increased risk of myocardial infarction (MI) when ketorolac was administered postoperatively with antiplatelet drugs.54 The coadministration of aspirin and COX-1 inhibitors after cardiac surgery has not been well studied. Given the potential for COX inhibitors (particularly COX-2 inhibitors55) to exacerbate ischemic heart disease5658 (including after cardiac surgery59), it is suggested that, until further research is done, where possible, analgesic drugs with minimal effects on COX (e.g., acetaminophen42,56) be considered particularly in patients who have undergone a PCI procedure with stent placement.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Aspirin “Resistance” and “High on Treatment Platelet Reactivity (HPR)”

No antithrombotic drug currently available is 100% effective in the prevention of adverse thrombotic events.60 The incidence of true aspirin “resistance,” defined as the inability of aspirin to inhibit COX-1–dependent TXA2 production, is very low (approximately 1%–2%).61 Current estimates suggest that up to 30% of treated individuals may, however, have an inadequate response to aspirin treatment at doses <300 mg daily,62 and are susceptible to treatment failure. Treatment failure may be associated with significant adverse outcomes including death, MI, cerebrovascular accident, closure of saphenous vein grafts, and occlusion of peripheral arterial grafts.63 The reasons for inadequate drug effect while on treatment have been investigated. Patient noncompliance with the prescribed medication may be a significant cause (3%–40%).64 Indeed, studies reporting the incidence of treatment failure that have not controlled for noncompliance should be considered flawed methodologically. Moreover, failure to take antiplatelet drugs as prescribed may place patients at increased risk for thrombotic complications because of rebound platelet activation.65 However, a number of patients have been observed to have inadequate response to aspirin treatment despite receiving doses considered adequate for the majority of patients. These patients are discovered by using an in vitro test of platelet function (Fig. 2) (with assay limits defined for the test by the investigator) and are described as having “high platelet reactivity (HPR)” or “biochemical resistance.”66 HPR is an ex vivo diagnosis based on testing and should be considered as a primary event. Clinical thrombosis is a very late sign of HPR if it is present, but is not definitive proof that HPR is the cause of thrombosis. Differences in thrombotic outcomes for patients whose antiplatelet dosing was based on ex vivo platelet function test results have been demonstrated.63,67,68 HPR is measured differently using different tests and different values based on the drug being evaluated and the investigator definition.

Figure 2
Figure 2
Image Tools

Conditions associated with an inflammatory response such as unstable angina,69 AMI,70 diabetes,71 and cardiac surgery72 are associated with HPR in aspirin-treated patients. In animals, the development of atherosclerosis is accompanied by an inflammatory response mediated through the thromboxane pathway with generation of free radicals.73 A link between direct measures of inflammation and increased thrombogenicity has recently been demonstrated.74 Generation of inflammatory cytokines as part of the inflammatory response leads to endothelial and monocyte cell activation with expression of tissue factor, a potent stimulus for platelet activation.75,76 In turn, activated platelets contribute to further inflammation by releasing other inflammatory mediators such as platelet activating factor.77 Surgery leads to increases in catecholamines.72,78 Catecholamines have been demonstrated to enhance the inflammatory response in vitro79 and in an animal model,80 and to increase platelet reactivity,81,82 which is only partially responsive to inhibition by aspirin.83

Other possible mechanisms for HPR include genetic polymorphisms of the platelet glycoprotein receptor84 and COX-1 and COX-2 alleles,85 generation of aspirin-insensitive COX,69 and increased platelet turnover.86 In combination, these factors may lead to reduced aspirin effect20,86 and increased risk for perioperative ischemic events.87 In the perioperative period, although the effectiveness of aspirin to prevent thrombotic complications has been demonstrated,16 its efficacy may be reduced in a substantial proportion of patients.88

Statistically, approximately 3% of patients should be expected to be hypo-responders based on their response to arachidonic acid testing.89 The optimal management of patients with a true lack of response to aspirin has not been clarified.90 It is mandatory to ensure that reversible causes of failure such as lack of compliance have been addressed.35,91 Higher doses of aspirin may increase the number of aspirin responders as determined by response to in vitro tests of platelet function.92 This has been observed clinically after cardiac surgery,93 and increased aspirin doses have been associated with a reduction in graft failure in the postoperative phase after cardiac surgery.94 The use of alternative antiplatelet drugs such as clopidogrel alone or in combination with aspirin might be considered.95 However, the additional benefit obtained has been modest when examined in randomized clinical trials.14 In addition, some patients with an inadequate response to aspirin may also have an inadequate response to clopidogrel (i.e., dual “resistance”), which may be particularly prevalent among women and diabetics.96

The term “aspirin resistance” has also been used to describe the inability of aspirin to protect individual patients from thrombotic complications (often referred to as clinical resistance).35,9799 Without biochemical confirmation, the occurrence of a thrombotic event in a patient while receiving aspirin therapy should more appropriately be labeled as a “treatment failure,” which may have many causes other than the inability of aspirin to inhibit TXA2 production (Table 3).100 Given the multiple pathways by which platelets are activated90 and by which ischemic events can occur, it is unrealistic to expect any single drug to abolish all ischemic events.101,102

Table 3
Table 3
Image Tools
Back to Top | Article Outline

P2Y12 RECEPTOR BLOCKING DRUGS

The Thienopyridines

Back to Top | Article Outline
Clopidogrel
Efficacy

Originally introduced as a safer drug than its precursor ticlopidine, clopidogrel has been shown to be marginally more effective than aspirin for the secondary prevention of vascular events.103 Given its cost and side-effect profile, it should only be used as the primary drug for the prevention of cardiovascular events in patients who are intolerant or allergic to aspirin23 or to provide enhanced protection when combined with aspirin23 (albeit with an increased risk of bleeding104). Treatment should therefore be individualized based on guideline recommendations.812,15,23,31,32,105107

Back to Top | Article Outline
Pharmacokinetics

Clopidogrel is a prodrug and has no direct antiplatelet activity of its own. After oral administration of clopidogrel, the drug is variably absorbed with approximately 50% bioavailability.108 The majority of absorbed clopidogrel (85%) is extensively hydrolyzed by esterases to the inactive carboxylic acid metabolite SR 26334.109 In the liver, clopidogrel is metabolized in a 2-step process by CYP3A4/3A5 with additional contributions by CYP2B6/1A2/2C9/2C19110 to a very short-lived active metabolite (R130964), which is responsible for its effect on platelet aggregation.111 This process demonstrates considerable interpatient variability,112 and a genetic component to the variability is likely.85 Recent investigations have identified that variants of the CYP2C19 genotype (e.g., the loss of function CYP2C19*2 allele113) are associated with diminished platelet response to clopidogrel114,115 but this may be overcome by monitoring and adjusting the dose based on the platelet reactivity.116 Peak concentrations of the parent drug, its active metabolite, and the carboxylic acid metabolite occur within approximately 1 to 2 hours109,111 and there is little increased efficacy for doses >600 mg because of limited drug absorption.117 The drug and its metabolite are extensively bound to serum proteins. Elimination is by the feces (50%) and urine (50%).109 Dosage adjustment is generally not necessary in patients with renal118 or hepatic119 dysfunction. Inhibition of platelet aggregation reaches a level of approximately 40% to 60% after 3 to 7 days of daily administration of 75 mg, but this time can be significantly shortened by administering an initial loading dose.120

Back to Top | Article Outline
Pharmacodynamics

Significant interpatient variability in antithrombotic effects of clopidogrel has been ascribed to the variability in drug absorption as well as to alterations and genetic differences in hepatic metabolism.108,113115,121 Clopidogrel's active metabolite binds to the platelet P2Y12 receptor to form disulfide bridges with the extracellular cysteine residues Cys17 and Cys270122 to irreversibly inhibit adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced platelet aggregation.123 The possibility of a rebound increase in platelet activity after discontinuation of clopidogrel therapy has been raised by a retrospective review demonstrating an increased incidence of death and AMI clustered in the 90 days after discontinuation of clopidogrel.124 A subsequent prospective study could not confirm these results although the number of patients studied was small.125 Until this issue is further clarified, it is suggested that care should be exercised when one is considering discontinuing clopidogrel before surgery.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Adverse Effects

The major side effect of clopidogrel administration is the increased risk of bleeding.104 Use of clopidogrel in the perioperative period has been associated with an increased need for surgical reexploration for bleeding and use of blood products after cardiac surgery.126 Use of a bleeding management algorithm was associated with a reduction in transfusion requirements after cardiac surgery in patients treated with clopidogrel, although the bleeding rate was still substantially higher than in a group of control patients not receiving clopidogrel.127 A postoperative algorithm based on reintroduction of antiplatelet drugs when chest tube drainage was <50 mL/h allowed the successful reintroduction of aspirin and clopidogrel without an increased risk of bleeding.128 The side-effect profile of clopidogrel necessitating early discontinuation because of side effects includes neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, or hemorrhagic events.129 Compared with aspirin, there were fewer GI symptoms but an increased incidence of diarrhea and rash. A rare but significant complication of clopidogrel is the development of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura.130

Back to Top | Article Outline
Drug Interactions

Because of the requirement for metabolism of clopidogrel by CYP3A4/3A5 to generate the active metabolite, there is the potential for clinically significant drug interactions, which could lead to therapeutic failure.111,131 CYP3A represents 40% to 80% of the cytochromes responsible for drug metabolism in humans,132 although there is substantial variability. Clopidogrel is metabolized predominantly by the 3A4 allele; however, 3A5 may contribute as much as 50% of hepatic CYP3A activity. The antiplatelet efficacy of clopidogrel may be influenced by 3A5 functional polymorphism (Fig. 3).123 There is concern that drugs that are CYP3A substrates (e.g., lipophilic statins) can inhibit the metabolism of clopidogrel to its active metabolite and thus lead to thrombosis.131 Most studies have not demonstrated an increased risk for thrombosis in patients receiving both CYP3A4 metabolized statins and clopidogrel.133136 However, there are significant limitations to the interpretation of the results (reviewed in Neubauer and Mugge137), and further study that accounts for confounders is required.

Figure 3
Figure 3
Image Tools

Clopidogrel activation to active metabolite is also dependent on metabolism by the CYP enzyme system.110 Randomized clinical trials have demonstrated the ability of the PPIs to reduce the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel138,139 and large observational studies have, in general, demonstrated that the combination may lead to an increased mortality risk140,141 or readmission for MI.142 Given that PPIs are recommended for patients receiving antiplatelet drugs who have gastric irritation or bleeding,143 and because they are frequently prophylactically administered in the perioperative period,144,145 patients receiving this combination of drugs should be monitored closely.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Clopidogrel HPR and Resistance

HPR also occurs with clopidogrel administration.61,146 As with aspirin, the consequences of inadequate clopidogrel effect on platelet reactivity can be devastating including MI, stroke, and death,147 but in the absence of biochemical testing (Fig. 2) to establish whether HPR exists, clinical reports of clopidogrel “resistance”148,149 should more appropriately be considered treatment failures.

The response to clopidogrel administration also has a bell-shaped curve and therefore a small percentage of patients would statistically be described as poor responders based on this phenomenon alone.112 Many of the same factors leading to aspirin HPR apply also to clopidogrel HPR (Table 3). Clopidogrel treatment factors for nonresponse that have been identified that are unrelated to measurement of drug effect include noncompliance (the incidence of which may far outweigh any degree of pharmacological HPR150), inability to pay for or access the medication,151 and inadequate education about the necessity of continuing the medication at the time of hospital discharge.152 Nevertheless, depending on the assay used, a substantial proportion of patients (up to 31%153) who receive clopidogrel in the usual doses are reported to have an inadequate response in terms of antiplatelet activity154 and a significant proportion of these can have adverse outcomes.60 Intrinsic factors that affect the interaction of active metabolite with its receptors (such as genetic alterations in the CYP2C19 gene, P2Y12 receptor polymorphisms, or alterations in intracellular signaling mechanisms) may also be involved (Table 3).155157

However, some patients have been demonstrated to have HPR in response to treatment with both aspirin and clopidogrel.158 These patients seem to be at very high risk for drug-eluting stent (DES) thrombosis or death.158 It should be noted, however, that although dual antiplatelet drug HPR may occur, HPR to one class of antiplatelet drugs does not necessarily confer HPR to other classes of antiplatelet drugs. Some nonresponders to a 300-mg initial loading dose of clopidogrel can be converted to responders by increasing the loading dose,159 by increasing the maintenance dose,160 or by increasing both the loading and maintenance dose.161 The degree of platelet reactivity (and drug responsiveness) may differ depending on such things as body mass index,116 stress,162 and the timing of drug administration in relation to the degree of platelet reactivity during the inciting event such as PCI153 or surgery.163 Of note, diabetic patients seem to have a consistently high level of HPR when treated with thienopyridines.164 As with aspirin, increased catecholamine levels have been identified as a risk factor for increased residual platelet reactivity despite dual antiplatelet therapy.82,165 The perioperative period may therefore be a period of increased risk for thrombosis.166 Until this question has been studied, in situations of high risk for thrombosis in which clopidogrel was discontinued before surgery, it may be reasonable to consider reinstitution of clopidogrel therapy with a bolus of 300 to 600 mg to reestablish adequate antiplatelet effects after adequate hemostasis has been ensured.166 Antiplatelet therapy should also include the use of aspirin,19 which should be reinstituted as soon as hemostasis has been achieved or on the morning after surgery.35

Back to Top | Article Outline
Prasugrel (CS-747, LY640315)

Prasugrel is one of several new drugs that also act at the P2Y12 receptor167 (Fig. 1) and has been introduced into practice for the prevention of thrombosis after PCI.33 It belongs to the thienopyridine class of therapeutic drugs.168

Back to Top | Article Outline
Efficacy

Randomized clinical trials have established the efficacy of prasugrel as an antithrombotic drug.169 In the setting of PCI, initial studies suggested that prasugrel produced a greater degree of platelet inhibition than clopidogrel and was associated with fewer incidences of major adverse cardiac events (MI, recurrent ischemia, and clinical target vessel thrombosis).170,171 In a follow-up phase III study, patients undergoing PCI and receiving aspirin were randomized to receive either prasugrel 60 mg as an initial loading dose and then 10 mg daily (n = 6813) versus clopidogrel 300 mg loading dose and 75 mg (n = 6795) daily, and followed for 6 to 15 months.172 Prasugrel administration was associated with a significant reduction in death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal MI, or nonfatal stroke (9.9% vs 12.1%). In addition, prasugrel produced a significant reduction in the rates of MI (7.4% vs 9.7%), urgent target vessel revascularization (2.5% vs 3.7%), and stent thrombosis (1.1% vs 2.4%). However, there was an increased risk of bleeding events, particularly in patients older than 75 years of age, with a small body mass index, with a history of stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA), and/or in those undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Subgroup analysis of patients receiving coronary artery stents (either bare metal or DES) for ACS173 or ST segment elevation MI174 demonstrated improved protection from in-stent thrombosis (and subsequent death or MI) when prasugrel was given, without increased risk for major bleeding complications. Other subgroup analyses have shown greater protection using prasugrel in patients with diabetes mellitus175 and a reduction in subsequent thrombotic events after the initial event.176

Back to Top | Article Outline
Pharmacokinetics

Animal studies have shown prasugrel to be 10 to 100 times more potent than clopidogrel in the inhibition of platelet aggregation.168 Similar to clopidogrel, prasugrel is a prodrug and must be metabolized to an active metabolite to exhibit its antiplatelet effect.177 Conversion of prasugrel to its active metabolite is more rapid than clopidogrel, involving only a single cytochrome P450–dependent step (CYP3A4 and to a lesser extent CYP2B6),178 leading to increased levels of the active metabolite and hence increased clinical effect.179 Prasugrel metabolism seems to be less affected by genetic variations in CYP2C19 and CYP2C9 than clopidogrel180 and less affected by drug interactions involving CYP3A4 for metabolism leading to less variation in active metabolite formation.111 In healthy volunteers, prasugrel is rapidly absorbed and metabolized after oral administration with peak concentrations of the metabolites occurring at 0.5 hour.181,182 Approximately 68% of a dose is excreted as metabolites in the urine and the remainder in the feces.181 Dose-finding studies have shown maximum effects with an acceptable safety profile with an initial loading dose of 40 to 60 mg, and dose-dependent inhibition of platelet activity during maintenance dosing with a daily dose of 15 mg producing a sustained response.183185 The ratio of the active metabolite for prasugrel has been reported to be 2.2 times higher than that for clopidogrel after a loading dose, which may explain the faster onset of activity, higher levels of active compound, and reduced variability of platelet inhibition observed with prasugrel.179

Back to Top | Article Outline
Pharmacodynamics

In common with other thienopyridine derivatives, prasugrel's active metabolite (R-138727) irreversibly binds to the P2Y12 receptor by forming disulfide bridges between extracellular cysteine residues at positions Cys17 and Cys270 to prevent platelet activation.122 In patients with stable coronary artery disease, prasugrel produced a faster and more effective inhibition of platelet function than clopidogrel.186,187 In multiple-dose studies, the maximum antiplatelet effect occurred after 2 days and recovery of platelet function occurred gradually over the 2 days after discontinuation of the drug.168 In a study comparing platelet aggregation response to a loading dose of prasugrel 60 mg or clopidogrel 300 mg, the incidence of poor platelet aggregation response after prasugrel administration was lower (0%) than for clopidogrel (17%–43%).188 When healthy subjects receiving clopidogrel therapy were switched directly to prasugrel (with or without a loading dose), greater inhibition of platelet aggregation was observed without an increased bleeding risk.189 In patients with a demonstrated CYP2C19*2 loss of function allele with reduced ability to generate the active metabolite of clopidogrel, use of prasugrel improved platelet function inhibition in patients for whom HPR was demonstrated using clopidogrel.157

Back to Top | Article Outline
Adverse Effects

The major adverse effect of prasugrel is bleeding. Prasugrel is a more potent inhibitor of platelet function than clopidogrel.190 In the phase III trial, prasugrel administration was associated with a significantly increased incidence of major adverse bleeding events (2.4% vs 1.8%; hazard ratio, 1.32).172 There was a higher incidence of life-threatening bleeding (1.4% vs 0.9%), including nonfatal bleeding (1.1% vs 0.9%) and fatal bleeding (0.4% vs 0.1%). Although it may be anticipated that excess bleeding might occur based on the increased potency of prasugrel, patients at risk for bleeding were excluded from the trial to start, prompting one editorialist to comment that more extended use of the drug in excluded patients would likely be associated with an even greater risk of bleeding.191 He calculated a risk/benefit ratio of 1:1, i.e., for every additional life saved by the use of prasugrel over clopidogrel, one could expect an additional death due to bleeding. He noted in particular that patients with a history of stroke or TIA were particularly susceptible to the adverse bleeding risk (2.3% vs 0%) and suggested that, at the dose tested in this trial, prasugrel should be avoided in patients with known cerebrovascular disease. Subsequent analysis of bleeding events has determined that the majority occurred during the maintenance phase of the study and might be ameliorated in high-risk patients (age >75 years or weight <60 kg) by a reduction in the maintenance dose.167,192

Back to Top | Article Outline
Drug Interactions

Because of the requirement for metabolism by the cytochrome P450 system (CYP3A4/CYP2B6), there is a theoretical possibility of interactions with other drugs metabolized by that system although enzyme kinetic studies suggest this is unlikely.139,178,193

Back to Top | Article Outline
Prasugrel HPR

Compared with clopidogrel, use of prasugrel led to fewer nonresponders and better clinical response in diabetic patients.164 Poor response to clopidogrel (as measured by light transmission aggregometry) was attributed to reductions in the amount of measured active metabolite available to interact with platelets as opposed to alterations in the platelet P2Y12 receptor.

The place of prasugrel in the management of atherothrombotic occlusive disease remains to be determined. Further clinical trials are ongoing (e.g., TRILOGY-ACS, SWAP, ACAPULCO, OPTIMUS-3), examining the potential utility of prasugrel in a variety of other patient populations.167 From a practical point of view, prasugrel is more potent than clopidogrel but not shorter acting so one could expect that in the perioperative period there may be an increased risk of bleeding. When, or if, it should be discontinued in the perioperative period has not been studied but discontinuance a minimum of 5 days before elective surgery where there is significant risk of bleeding would be in keeping with the guidelines suggested for clopidogrel and based on the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties of the drug.168,183,184

Back to Top | Article Outline
Elinogrel (PRT060128)

Elinogrel is a direct-acting, reversible P2Y12 receptor inhibitor with a novel structure (sulfonylurea) and can be administered both orally and IV.194 This allows for the rapid onset of antiplatelet activity after IV administration and then a transition to a predictable platelet inhibition with the oral dosing form.195

Back to Top | Article Outline
Efficacy

Phase I studies demonstrated the ability to inhibit ADP-induced platelet aggregation within 20 minutes of administration; dose-dependent inhibition of platelet aggregation; synergism when administered with aspirin; and additional inhibition of platelet aggregation in the Early Rapid Reversal of Platelet Thrombosis with IV Elinogrel before PCI to Optimize Reperfusion in Acute Myocardial Infarction (ERASE-MI) study. ERASE-MI was a phase IIA study in subjects undergoing primary PCI and randomized to receive either elinogrel or placebo before the start of the diagnostic angiogram that preceded the primary PCI procedure.196 It was conducted in 2 phases: phase I was a dose-escalation study examining 10 mg (n = 10), or 20, 40, or 60 mg (n = 20 each) or placebo; phase II was a dose-confirmation study examining the highest tolerated dose but was not completed because the sponsor terminated the study for administrative reasons. Patients could receive aspirin, heparin, and clopidogrel but other anticoagulants were proscribed. No major bleeding events occurred in the treated population at any dose. No differences in adverse events were recorded although they were numerically higher in the placebo group. The authors concluded that elinogrel, at the doses examined in this study, was feasible and tolerable. The drug is undergoing further study (INNOVATE PCI NCT00751231).

Back to Top | Article Outline
Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics

After administration of a 50-mg oral dose, approximately 56% of the total dose was excreted in urine and 48% in feces. The main circulating compound was unchanged elinogrel and the major compound excreted in urine and feces was the parent compound. The major metabolic route was by demethylation to form the metabolite PRT060301 (approximately 10%).194 In a study of 20 patients who had previously undergone PCI and were being treated chronically with clopidogrel 75 mg and aspirin 81 mg daily and screened for the presence of HPR, elinogrel 60 mg was given orally between 12 and 16 hours after the previous day's dose of clopidogrel.197 The drug had a terminal elimination half-life of 12 hours and was cleared by the hepatic and renal routes with only limited metabolism.197 Peak concentration was observed at 4 to 6 hours followed by a decrease to negligible levels by 24 hours. Plasma concentrations mirrored the pharmacodynamic effect. The antiplatelet effect peaked at 4 to 6 hours and returned to predosing levels by 24 hours. In patients for whom HPR was demonstrated while receiving aspirin and clopidogrel, additional inhibition of platelet aggregation after elinogrel administration occurred even in subjects known to have the CYP2C19*2 allele.194

Back to Top | Article Outline
Adverse Effects

In the phase I clinical trials, single-dose elinogrel was well tolerated with no serious or clinically significant adverse events. In the phase IIa trial, the incidence of bleeding and serious adverse events was similar.194 In theory, because of its sulfonylurea backbone, patients with a history of adverse reactions to sulfonylurea drugs might be at increased risk for development of allergic type reactions.

Back to Top | Article Outline

ADP RECEPTOR ANTAGONISTS

Cangrelor (AR-C69931)

Cangrelor is an ADP receptor antagonist that has been investigated in recent clinical trials167,198 (Fig. 1).33 Because it is a short-acting, IV, reversible inhibitor of platelet function, it has the potential to play a significant role in the management of patients with atherosclerotic disease in the perioperative period.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Efficacy

In small studies, cangrelor was an effective antithrombotic drug in patients with ACS, unstable angina, or non–Q wave MI.199,200 In a randomized clinical trial of patients with AMI receiving cangrelor alone, alteplase alone, or 1 of 3 differing doses of cangrelor plus half-dose alteplase, cangrelor was an effective adjunct when added to alteplase for resolution of ST segment elevation.201 The combination was better than either drug alone. Researchers of 2 phase III clinical trials using cangrelor in patients undergoing PCI have recently reported their outcomes. Bhatt et al.202 performed a randomized trial of the addition of cangrelor or placebo to clopidogrel in 5362 patients undergoing PCI (CHAMPION PLATFORM Study). The primary end point was a composite of death, MI, or ischemia-driven revascularization at 48 hours. There was no difference in the primary end point between the 2 groups. In 2 prespecified subgroup analyses, cangrelor produced a significant difference in the rate of stent thrombosis and death from any cause. No differences in transfusion rate were observed although a higher incidence of groin hematoma occurred in the cangrelor-treated group. The trial was terminated early when an interim analysis concluded that the trial was unlikely to show superiority for the primary end point. The second trial examined the effect of cangrelor or clopidogrel administered to 8716 patients before undergoing PCI (CHAMPION PCI Trial).203 The same composite end point was used as in the CHAMPION PLATFORM trial. Again, no difference in outcome was measured. This trial also was terminated early for lack of efficacy.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Pharmacokinetics

Given IV, cangrelor has a rapid onset of action (steady state at 30 minutes in the absence of a loading dose) and clearance (50 L/h) with an elimination half-time of <9 minutes. This leads to rapid return of platelet function (within 60 minutes) when the drug is discontinued.204 Metabolism is by sequential dephosphorylation and there are no active metabolites.167 The drug is metabolized in plasma and metabolism seems to be independent of abnormalities of liver or kidney function suggesting its utility in patients with impaired renal function.167

Back to Top | Article Outline
Pharmacodynamics

Cangrelor acts as a reversible inhibitor of the P2Y12 receptor on the platelet surface.205 It achieves greater inhibition of platelet aggregation than that obtained by clopidogrel.206

Back to Top | Article Outline
Adverse Effects

In early clinical trials, cangrelor was well tolerated (bleeding, transient increases in liver enzymes, and bleeding at injection sites were the most common side effects).199201,207 In patients undergoing PCI, cangrelor was not associated with an increased bleeding risk in patients receiving concomitant aspirin, heparin, and placebo for 18 to 24 hours, or, when compared with patients receiving abciximab before PCI, with an increased risk of bleeding or adverse cardiac events.207 In the phase III clinical trials, cangrelor administration was associated with trends toward increased bleeding.202,203 Although the mechanism has not been determined, concern has been raised about the possibility of an increased incidence of dyspnea when drugs from this class are used.208

Back to Top | Article Outline
Drug Interactions

When given as combined therapy, cangrelor inhibited the antiplatelet activity of clopidogrel but not when clopidogrel was administered after cangrelor sequentially.209 The mechanism was postulated to be due to inhibition by cangrelor of the binding of the active metabolite of clopidogrel to serine residues of the P2Y12 receptor on the platelet surface.

An IV P2Y12 inhibitor might well serve as an effective bridge to treatment in the perioperative period or in situations whereby operative intervention is a possibility, and research on the role cangrelor might have as bridge therapy for elective cardiac surgery is continuing. Such a drug would be an important advance in the safe management of patients requiring antiplatelet therapy in the perioperative period.

Back to Top | Article Outline

CYCLOPENTYLTRIAZOLOPYRIMIDINES

Ticagrelor (AZD6140)

Ticagrelor is an orally active reversible P2Y12 receptor antagonist of the cyclopentyltriazolopyrimidine class of drugs undergoing clinical trials167,210 (Fig. 1).33

Back to Top | Article Outline
Efficacy

Ticagrelor has been shown to rapidly and effectively inhibit platelet aggregation at doses ranging from 50 to 200 mg twice daily. On day 1, peak inhibition occurred at 2 to 4 hours whereas there was minimal inhibition demonstrated with clopidogrel (75 mg twice a day). For the subset of 84 patients requiring CABG surgery in a phase II dose-finding study of 2500 patients presenting with ACS,211 there was no increased incidence of major bleeding in ticagrelor patients requiring surgery within 24 hours of drug administration overall (1 of 2 patients in the clopidogrel group versus 5 of 10 ticagrelor patients), but a tendency for reduced bleeding for patients requiring surgery between days 1 and 5 was observed. In the trial as a whole, there were more asymptomatic ventricular pauses observed in the ticagrelor-treated patients. No differences in death occurred, but there was a slight trend toward reduced incidence of MI in ticagrelor-treated patients.

Ticagrelor was subsequently evaluated in a phase III, double-blind, randomized clinical trial (Study of Platelet Inhibition and patient Outcomes [PLATO]) in patients with ACS.212 Patients with ACS, with or without ST segment elevation, were randomized to receive ticagrelor 180-mg loading dose followed by 90 mg twice daily (n = 9333) or clopidogrel 300- to 600-mg loading dose followed by 75 mg daily (n = 9291) for the prevention of cardiovascular events. The primary end point (a composite end point of time to the earliest occurrence of MI, stroke, or death from vascular causes) occurred in significantly fewer patients when examined at the 12-month follow-up time point (ticagrelor 9.8% vs clopidogrel 11.7%; P < 0.001). For patients receiving a stent, the rate of stent thrombosis was significantly lower in the ticagrelor group (1.3% vs 1.9%; P = 0.009). No differences in the rate of major bleeding complications were observed (ticagrelor 11.6% vs clopidogrel 11.2%; P = 0.43). Analysis of the stroke subpopulation alone revealed an increased incidence of hemorrhagic stroke (0.2% vs 0.1%; P = 0.10). In the subpopulation of patients undergoing CABG surgery, no difference in the rate of major bleeding complications was observed (ticagrelor 7.4% [n = 619] vs clopidogrel 7.9% [n = 654]). An increased incidence of major or minor bleeding (16.1% vs 14.6%; P = 0.008), dyspnea requiring discontinuation of treatment (0.9% vs 0.1%; P < 0.001), ventricular pauses of >3 seconds within the first week of therapy (5.8% vs 3.6%; P = 0.01), and discontinuation as a result of any adverse event (7.4% vs 6.0%; P < 0.001) was observed in the study population as a whole. The authors concluded that ticagrelor was more effective than clopidogrel for the management of patients with ACS without an increased bleeding risk. An accompanying editorial suggested that, because of its reversible effect on platelet function, ticagrelor may have utility in patients for whom the coronary anatomy is unknown and in whom a CABG procedure is deemed probable.213 In addition, for patients receiving prasugrel or clopidogrel and requiring elective surgery, switching them to ticagrelor 5 to 7 days before surgery could be considered. Caution with its use in patients with a history of stroke or TIA was advised. These recommendations require verification in properly conducted clinical trials. In a predefined subset of patients undergoing a planned invasive strategy, fewer patients randomized to the ticagrelor group had the composite outcome of cardiovascular death, MI, or stroke without an increased incidence of bleeding compared with the group randomized to clopidogrel treatment.214 In a randomized, crossover study, use of ticagrelor produced increased platelet inhibition as compared with clopidogrel and more patients considered nonresponsive to clopidogrel215 became responsive to ticagrelor than vice versa.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Pharmacokinetics

Ticagrelor is absorbed orally and does not require metabolic activation for its clinical effect.216,217 It has one known active metabolite, which is present in blood at a concentration approximately one-third that of the parent compound as determined in phase I trials.216,217 After oral dosing in healthy volunteers, peak effect on platelet inhibition was measured at 2 to 4 hours.216 The drug seems to have linear kinetics217 and after twice-daily administration of ticagrelor to patients with atherosclerotic disease, there was a linear and dose-related increase in ticagrelor and its active metabolite with no age- or gender-related differences.216 The terminal half-life was approximately 7 hours.217

Back to Top | Article Outline
Pharmacodynamics

Ticagrelor binds to the P2Y12 receptor in a reversible manner and nearly completely inhibits ADP-induced platelet aggregation.216,218 It has a faster onset and offset of platelet inhibition than clopidogrel.219 Ticagrelor has been shown to rapidly and effectively inhibit platelet aggregation at doses ranging from 50 to 200 mg twice daily.216 Its ability to interact with the P2Y12 receptor does not seem to be affected by alterations in single nucleotide polymorphisms of the receptor gene.220 Ticagrelor produces more rapid and greater inhibition of platelet aggregation than clopidogrel.216,221 Doses >100 mg produced very little additional increase in the degree of inhibition of platelet aggregation. When compared with clopidogrel, no differences in inflammatory markers measured in a group of patients with ACS were detected.222

Back to Top | Article Outline
Adverse Effects

The most common adverse event after ticagrelor administration was bleeding.216 Dyspnea requiring discontinuation of therapy occurred in a larger proportion of patients (0.9% ticagrelor vs 0.1% clopidogrel) in the PLATO trial.212 In the ONSET/OFFSET study comparing ticagrelor (n = 57), clopidogrel (n = 54), or placebo (n = 12),219 in patients with stable coronary artery disease, the incidence of dyspnea and effect on pulmonary function measured by pulmonary function studies were examined.223 The incidence of dyspnea was 38.6% in ticagrelor-treated patients, 9.3% in the clopidogrel group, and 8.3% in the placebo group (P < 0.001). Dyspnea led to drug discontinuation in 3 patients in the ticagrelor group and was reversible. Dyspnea occurred early (within the first week) in the majority of affected patients and was described as mild. No changes in pulmonary function in any group were measured. Dyspnea was not a function of altered pharmacokinetic parameters.

Back to Top | Article Outline

PHOSPHODIESTERASE INHIBITORS

Dipyridamole

Dipyridamole is a pyrimidopyrimidine derivative with vasodilator and antiplatelet properties.224

Back to Top | Article Outline
Efficacy

Previous studies using the immediate-release formulation of dipyridamole did not, in general, show it to be superior to other antiplatelet drugs, and its side-effect profile (mainly headache) limited its application.225 However, more recent guidelines now include aspirin and extended-release dipyridamole as an acceptable choice for the prevention of cerebral ischemic events in patients with noncardioembolic TIA or stroke.3,4,105 Dipyridamole is inferior to clopidogrel treatment for aspirin-intolerant patients undergoing PCI and is not recommended for patients undergoing CABG surgery.3 Aspirin continues to be the first choice for prevention of occlusive vascular disease followed by clopidogrel and cilostazol for certain populations.3

However, given the above recommendations and in particular for stroke management, it is likely that anesthesiologists will encounter patients receiving the combined therapy, i.e., aspirin and extended-release dipyridamole. Perioperative management should weigh the risks and benefits including the possibility of increased risk of bleeding caused by the combination.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Pharmacokinetics

Absorption of oral doses of dipyridamole is quite variable226,227 but a modified-release formulation has improved the bioavailability.228 The drug is metabolized to a glucuronide, excreted primarily in bile, and subject to enterohepatic recirculation with a terminal half-life of 19 hours making twice-daily dosage possible particularly when the modified-release formulation is used.229 Dipyridamole is highly protein bound to albumin and α1-acid glycoprotein,230 with consequent reduction in drug effect.231 Because α1-acid glycoprotein is an acute phase reactant whose levels increase in the perioperative period,232 there is a possibility of reduced drug effect because of increased protein binding if dosing is not increased.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Pharmacodynamics

The mechanism of action is thought to be via increased cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) by inhibition of nucleotide phosphodiesterase, blockade of the uptake of adenosine thereby increasing the amount of adenosine at the platelet vascular interface,227 or direct stimulation of prostacyclin release from the endothelium.227 In high doses, drug-induced vasodilation and tachycardia may produce myocardial ischemia, which may be a limiting factor for its use as an antiplatelet drug.233 Compared with aspirin or clopidogrel, dipyridamole produced sustained platelet inhibition but via a broader range of mechanisms.234,235

Back to Top | Article Outline
Adverse Effects

Use of dipyridamole is associated with an increased risk of bleeding events.47 The most common adverse effect of chronic administration is headache.236 Dipyridamole has been used for cardiac diagnostic testing including stress echocardiograms (single-dose studies) and in that population there is a small incidence of death (0.9:10,000), stroke or TIA (1.22:10,000), AMI (1.76:10,000), bronchospasm (1.22:10,000), and arrhythmias (0.81:10,000) detected.237

Back to Top | Article Outline
Drug Interactions

When coadministered with aspirin, there is an increased risk for bleeding.47 Although we could find no substantiating reports, it is possible that there could be additive hypotensive effects if dipyridamole was administered with other drugs that are vasodilators, e.g., ACE inhibitors.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Cilostazol

Cilostazol is a phosphodiesterase 3 inhibitor with vasodilator and antiplatelet aggregation properties238 (Fig. 1).33

Back to Top | Article Outline
Efficacy

Cilostazol has been demonstrated to be effective in the setting of peripheral vascular disease239 and is currently recommended for patients with moderate-to-severe disabling intermittent claudication who do not respond to exercise therapy, and who are not candidates for surgical or catheter-based interventions.31 Cilostazol has been shown to prevent stent thrombosis and restenosis.240,241 An enhanced antiplatelet effect of triple therapy (with aspirin and clopidogrel) has been demonstrated,242 although side effects with cilostazol (skin rash and GI upset) limited its use.243,244 For the prevention of stroke, Gotoh et al.245 demonstrated a significant reduction in recurrence of cerebral infarction as compared with placebo alone. In a randomized trial examining the relative merits of cilostazol versus aspirin in patients with an ischemic stroke using as the primary outcome the recurrence of stroke, Huang et al.246 determined that there was no difference in the ischemic stroke reoccurrence rate but patients treated with cilostazol had lower rates of cerebral bleeding suggesting perhaps an improved safety profile. Compared with aspirin alone, cilostazol and aspirin demonstrated enhanced antiplatelet activity in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery surgery.247

Back to Top | Article Outline
Pharmacokinetics

There is large variability in the absorption of orally administered cilostazol248 that does not seem to be attributable to the activity of the drug transporter P-glycoprotein.249 The drug is metabolized primarily by CYP3A4/5 with a lesser contribution by CYP2C19 to inactive metabolites.250 It is extensively protein bound (approximately 95% primarily to albumin).251 The elimination half-time for cilostazol is approximately 10 hours.252 No differences in pharmacokinetics were detected based on age or gender in healthy subjects aged 50 to 80 years.251,252 Although the clearance of cilostazol was increased in patients with renal failure253 and decreased in patients with liver failure,252,254 no dosage adjustments were necessary.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Pharmacodynamics

Cilostazol is a more potent inhibitor of platelet aggregation than ticlopidine or aspirin.255 Its mechanism of action is to inhibit the intracellular enzyme phosphodiesterase 3 leading to an increase in cyclic adenosine monophosphate with resultant decreases in platelet aggregation and vasodilation.252 Similar concerns about producing hypotension and tachycardia as a result of vasodilation as are present with dipyridamole are also relevant here.256

Back to Top | Article Outline
Adverse Effects

Headache is a common side effect of treatment with cilostazol and may be a reason some patients discontinue therapy.257 In a postregistration placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind safety trial of the use of cilostazol in patients with peripheral vascular disease, a significant proportion of patients discontinued therapy (60%).258 There was no increased incidence of death or bleeding. A blinded post hoc analysis demonstrated an increased risk of cerebral vascular events in patients in the placebo arm (6.1% vs 3.2%).259

Back to Top | Article Outline
Drug Interactions

Because of its metabolism by CYP3A4 and CYP2C19, cilostazol may be involved in drug interactions with drugs also requiring these isoforms for their metabolism. Cilostazol metabolism was inhibited by omeprazole (a CYP2C19 inhibitor) and erythromycin (a potent inhibitor of CYP3A4) with resultant decreases in plasma concentrations of cilostazol and its active metabolite.260,261 Coadministration with lovastatin (a CYP3A4 substrate) resulted in reductions in cilostazol plasma concentrations but not to clinically significant levels.262 Lovastatin levels were increased but not to levels requiring dosage adjustments. There were no reports of a clinically significant interaction when coadministered with aspirin.252

Back to Top | Article Outline

PERIOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT

Antiplatelet drugs may increase the risk of surgical bleeding. However, there have been several reports of stent thrombosis and death in the perioperative period when antiplatelet drugs were discontinued.34 In addition, increased mortality when surgery is delayed in patients taking antiplatelet drugs to allow coagulation variables to normalize has been reported.263 These reports have raised concern about the appropriate management of antiplatelet drugs in the perioperative period.264 The most appropriate timing of surgery after insertion of a bare metal stent or DES is still under active investigation but initial reports suggest that surgery within the first 3 months after insertion of either type of stent is particularly hazardous.34,265 Thereafter, problems with late stent thrombosis are more prevalent in patients receiving DESs.266 Although there seems to be no time frame when the risk becomes zero regardless of when a DES was inserted,267 recent data suggest that the benefit of continuing dual antiplatelet therapy beyond 12 months is marginal.268

As a consequence of these concerns, the American Heart Association has released a statement13 concerning premature discontinuation of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery stents. This advisory comments that stent thrombosis is a catastrophic event with the incidence of death between 20% and 45% or MI up to 64%. It may be more common than previously appreciated particularly because there is increasing usage of these stents in patients with more complicated disease than those who were originally studied (so-called “off label” usage).269 Although there were few data upon which to make any recommendation, the American Heart Association advisory observed that the objective evidence for an increased risk of bleeding during noncardiac surgery in patients with dual antiplatelet therapy continued perioperatively was weak. However, a recent report suggests that as many as 26% of patients will require noncardiac surgery within 5 years after PCI and, of these, 8.6% will have a bleeding episode.270 These data suggest that as the use of antiplatelet therapy after DES continues and more patients receiving them present for elective surgery, there will be an increased risk for adverse bleeding outcomes in this population. The general experience with cardiac surgery is that there are increased bleeding complications when clopidogrel is part of dual antiplatelet therapy that is continued into the perioperative period.17,18,271,272 Where possible, aspirin should be continued throughout the perioperative period. The advisory panel could find no satisfactory “bridge” therapy for stent patients during this period because anticoagulants had been determined to be unsatisfactory in this regard and led to increased bleeding. There were no data supporting the efficacy of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa drugs in this situation. They suggested that, in keeping with the advice given by a recent Food and Drug Administration panela for all patients receiving DES, dual antiplatelet therapy should be continued for 12 months after stent insertion. (Support for this recommendation has been provided in a study that demonstrated that clopidogrel use for >1 year was associated with a lower mortality in patients having PCI and stent placement.273) The panel also made additional recommendations concerning the management of patients receiving a DES. These were as follows:

1. “Before implantation of a stent, the physician should discuss the need for dual antiplatelet therapy. In patients not expected to comply with 12 months of thienopyridine therapy, whether for economic or other reasons, strong consideration should be given to avoiding a drug-eluting stent (DES).

2. In patients who are undergoing preparation for percutaneous coronary intervention and are likely to require invasive or surgical procedures within 12 months, consideration should be given to implantation of a bare-metal stent or performance of balloon angioplasty with provisional stent implantation instead of the routine use of DES.

3. A greater effort by healthcare professionals must be made before patient discharge to ensure patients are properly and thoroughly educated about the reasons they are prescribed thienopyridines and the significant risks associated with prematurely discontinuing such therapy.

4. Patients should be specifically instructed before hospital discharge to contact their treating cardiologist before stopping any antiplatelet therapy, even if instructed to stop such therapy by another healthcare provider.

5. Healthcare providers who perform invasive or surgical procedures and are concerned about periprocedural and postprocedural bleeding must be made aware of the potentially catastrophic risks of premature discontinuation of thienopyridine therapy. Such professionals who perform these procedures should contact the patient's cardiologist if issues regarding the patient's antiplatelet therapy are unclear to discuss optimal patient management strategy.

6. Elective procedures for which there is significant risk of perioperative or postoperative bleeding should be deferred until patients have completed an appropriate course of thienopyridine therapy (12 months after DES implantation if they are not at high risk of bleeding and a minimum of 1 month for bare-metal stent implantation).

7. For patients treated with DES who are to undergo subsequent procedures that mandate discontinuation of thienopyridine therapy, aspirin should be continued if at all possible and the thienopyridine restarted as soon as possible after the procedure because of concerns about late-stent thrombosis.

8. The healthcare industry, insurers, the US Congress, and the pharmaceutical industry should ensure that issues such as drug cost do not cause patients to prematurely discontinue thienopyridine therapy and to thus incur catastrophic cardiovascular complications.”

Clearly, these recommendations have significant implications for anesthesiologists who manage patients during the perioperative period and will require appropriate consultation with surgeons and cardiologists as well as a clear understanding of the risk-benefit ratio for performance of procedures such as regional blocks, epidurals, and spinals.274 Given that all new antiplatelet drugs will be required to be at least as effective as clopidogrel and the current recommendations against the performance of regional anesthesia when clopidogrel is present,275 we suggest that, where possible, regional anesthesia should only be performed when it is certain that the return of adequate platelet function has been ascertained (Table 1). Although their value as monitors of drug effect continues to evolve,276279 this may be a place for the use of platelet function monitors in the perioperative period. Catheters placed perioperatively should be removed before reinstitution of antiplatelet therapy.

The Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Drug-eluting Stent Task Force have also released their recommendations.280 They provide “practical advice” on a number of related issues such as patient selection, stent implantation, and medical-legal concerns. Of most relevance to anesthesiologists is the section on dual antiplatelet therapy. They concur with the Food and Drug Administration panel recommendation to increase the duration of dual antiplatelet therapy to 12 months from 3 months for patients receiving DESs. Furthermore, despite a lack of conclusive evidence, they suggest that patients in whom stent thrombosis may be catastrophic or lethal should undergo platelet aggregation studies and where appropriate, the dose of clopidogrel should be increased to 150 mg/d when platelet aggregation studies show <50% inhibition (a study in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus lends some strength to this recommendation281). They found no evidence that patients who have completed or discontinued their course of dual antiplatelet therapy, without incident, should restart thienopyridine therapy, although they should continue taking aspirin indefinitely. They reiterated that there are no proven “bridging” therapies for patients who must discontinue dual antiplatelet therapy for surgery.

Recognizing that cardiac surgery is associated with generation of an inflammatory response leading to increased platelet activation81,83 and turnover86 with resultant HPR for both aspirin and clopidogrel,20,88,166 the following approaches should be considered:

* Aspirin therapy should be continued preoperatively and throughout the perioperative period26 unless the risk of bleeding is considered to be high or the consequences of bleeding are significant, e.g., ophthalmological surgery.35

* Although there are currently no satisfactory risk stratification schemes with respect to the management of bleeding risk in patients taking antiplatelet drugs in the perioperative period,282 patients undergoing urological surgery, major vascular surgery, cardiac surgery with identified risk factors,283 neurosurgery involving the brain or spinal cord, or where the complications of bleeding might be catastrophic, e.g., ophthalmic surgery, clopidogrel should be discontinued 5 days preoperatively.10,19

* In patients at high risk of thrombotic complications (e.g., those with a DES in place), use of a higher dose of aspirin (e.g., 325 mg) in the postoperative period should be considered19,94 with a return to a dose of 81 mg daily after 30 days.88Using a variety of tests of platelet function, Golański et al.88 demonstrated that 37.5% of patients receiving 325 mg of aspirin after cardiac surgery were responders at day 10 postoperatively, increasing to a 96% response rate at 30 days, which forms the basis for this recommendation. In the postoperative period for patients at high risk of thrombotic complications (e.g., those with a DES in place) receiving clopidogrel, when the drug has been discontinued for ≥5 days in the perioperative period and there are no signs of ongoing bleeding, consideration should be given to rebolusing the drug (300–600 mg) with use of a higher maintenance dose (150 mg) for 30 days.166,284

* Resumption and continuation of other standard medical therapies including ACE inhibitors, statins, β-blockers, etc., should be initiated as soon as possible in the postoperative period.285

It should be recognized that these suggestions differ slightly from recently released guidelines primarily by suggesting clopidogrel discontinuation at 5 days before surgery (as opposed to 7–10 days),282,286and the use of rebolusing and higher maintenance doses postoperatively19,35,282 (Table 4). There is a lack of uniformity in the guideline recommendations (e.g., when [or if] aspirin should be discontinued preoperatively, when clopidogrel should be discontinued preoperatively, when aspirin therapy should be reinitiated postoperatively and at what dose, when clopidogrel therapy should be reinitiated and at what dose, the duration of antiplatelet therapy postoperatively, and the role of platelet function monitors19,282), no doubt a reflection of the rapidly advancing knowledge base upon which recommendations can be made.

Table 4
Table 4
Image Tools
Back to Top | Article Outline
Bleeding: Prevention and Management of Complications

Although the degree to which antiplatelet therapy continuation contributes to transfusion requirements intraoperatively is uncertain,287,288 it has to be acknowledged that continuing antiplatelet therapy in the perioperative period is not without risk for bleeding complications,17,26,271,289 including after performance of regional anesthesia,290,291 suggesting that an individualized approach to management of antiplatelet therapy is prudent. Guidelines on the management of antiplatelet therapy before cardiac surgery have been published.19,292 Continued use of clopidogrel may lead to more blood product usage and need for surgical reexploration,19 each of which carries additional risk for the patient.293296 Similarly, continued use of aspirin may lead to increased risk for transfusion and surgical reexploration.19 Use of point-of-care platelet function monitors or standard platelet aggregometry may allow one to determine the degree of residual drug effect and therefore the ability to make an informed decision about the safety of performing regional anesthesia. The merits of each platelet function test to measure drug effect on platelet activity have been reviewed elsewhere and will not be further considered here.297 If the performance of regional anesthesia is considered essential, platelet administration could be guided by platelet function monitoring if available.298 Other potential perioperative uses of platelet function monitoring include evaluation of patient compliance, timing of surgery, identification of “hyper-responders” for whom continuation of aspirin or clopidogrel in the perioperative period might lead to an increased risk of bleeding, and as part of a transfusion algorithm to guide blood component administration.64,127,299302

As regards the intraoperative management, in addition to component blood therapy including platelets, a meta-analysis has determined that the combined use of aspirin and antifibrinolytics did not increase prothrombotic complications and suggests that antifibrinolytics may reduce bleeding complications and have a role in the management of bleeding risk in high-risk patients receiving antiplatelet drugs perioperatively.303 The merits of which antifibrinolytic drug is best given their risk and benefits continue to be debated304307 and are beyond the scope of this review. There may be merit in using point-of-care devices to reduce transfusion requirements and guide component therapy.308312 When hemorrhage is severe and unresponsive to conventional treatment, recombinant activated factor VII may be considered, although the possibility of increased thrombotic complications must also be considered, especially in patients with vascular disease.19,313315

Back to Top | Article Outline
An Approach to Management

To help determine the best approach to the management of patients in the perioperative period, Riddell et al. have provided some advice based on consensus opinion.316 The first step is to determine the risk of bleeding (not only the quantity but also the site, e.g., ophthalmological surgery) in consultation with the surgeon and cardiologist. The next step is to determine the risk of stent thrombosis (Fig. 4).316 Finally, by assessing both risks, recommendations as to what to do with oral antiplatelet drugs are provided (Table 5).316

Figure 4
Figure 4
Image Tools
Table 5
Table 5
Image Tools
Back to Top | Article Outline

CONCLUSIONS

We have reviewed some of the issues of concern regarding the use of antiplatelet drugs in the perioperative period. In general, the safest approach to prevent thrombosis seems to be continuation of these drugs throughout the perioperative period except when concerns about perioperative bleeding outweigh those associated with the development of thrombotic occlusion. In situations in which a large inflammatory response is expected, higher doses or use of dual antiplatelet therapy may be indicated. Aspirin and clopidogrel (alone and in combination) have been the most studied and have the best-known risk-benefit profiles of drugs currently available. Other drugs, e.g., prasugrel, dipyridamole, and cilostazol, have not been as extensively investigated. Whether drugs such as cangrelor and ticagrelor confer additional benefits remains to be established. Knowledge of the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics may allow practitioners to anticipate difficulties associated with drug withdrawal and administration in the perioperative period including the potential for drug interactions.

Back to Top | Article Outline

DISCLOSURES

Name: Richard Hall, MD, FRCPC, FCCP

Conflicts of Interest: Dr. Hall has previously received honoraria from Bayer, Eisai, and Eli Lilly (makers of pharmaceutical agents referred to in this article).

Name: C. David Mazer, MD, FRCPC

Conflicts of Interest: Dr. Mazer has previously received honoraria from Bayer, AstraZeneca, and Bristol-Myers Squibb (makers of pharmaceutical agents referred to in this article).

a United States Food and Drug Administration Circulatory System Devices Panel. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/cdrh06.html#circulatory. Last accessed November 19, 2010. Cited Here...

Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES

1. Jennings LK. Role of platelets in atherothrombosis. Am J Cardiol 2009;103:4A–10A

2. Bhatt DL. Role of antiplatelet therapy across the spectrum of patients with coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 2009;103:11A–9A

3. Hirsh J, Guyatt G, Albers GW, Harrington R, Schunemann HJ. Executive summary: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Chest 2008;133:71S–109S

4. Albers GW, Amarenco P, Easton JD, Sacco RL, Teal P. Antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy for ischemic stroke: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Chest 2008;133:630S–9S

5. Hankey GJ, Sudlow CL, Dunbabin DW. Thienopyridine derivatives (ticlopidine, clopidogrel) versus aspirin for preventing stroke and other serious vascular events in high vascular risk patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000;2:CD001246

6. Leonardi-Bee J, Bath PM, Bousser MG, Davalos A, Diener HC, Guiraud-Chaumeil B, Sivenius J, Yatsu F, Dewey ME. Dipyridamole for preventing recurrent ischemic stroke and other vascular events: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized controlled trials. Stroke 2005;36:162–8

7. Antithrombotic Trialists' Collaboration. Collaborative meta-analysis of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy for prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in high risk patients. BMJ 2002;324:71–86

8. Antman EM, Hand M, Armstrong PW, Bates ER, Green LA, Halasyamani LK, Hochman JS, Krumholz HM, Lamas GA, Mullany CJ, Pearle DL, Sloan MA, Smith SC Jr, Anbe DT, Kushner FG, Ornato JP, Jacobs AK, Adams CD, Anderson JL, Buller CE, Creager MA, Ettinger SM, Halperin JL, Hunt SA, Lytle BW, Nishimura R, Page RL, Riegel B, Tarkington LG, Yancy CW. 2007 focused update of the ACC/AHA 2004 guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines: developed in collaboration with the Canadian Cardiovascular Society endorsed by the American Academy of Family Physicians: 2007 Writing Group to Review New Evidence and Update the ACC/AHA 2004 Guidelines for the Management of Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction, Writing on Behalf of the 2004 Writing Committee. Circulation 2008;117:296–329

9. Goodman SG, Menon V, Cannon CP, Steg G, Ohman EM, Harrington RA. Acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Chest 2008;133:708S–75S

10. Anderson JL, Adams CD, Antman EM, Bridges CR, Califf RM, Casey DE Jr, Chavey WE, Fesmire FM, Hochman JS, Levin TN, Lincoff AM, Peterson ED, Theroux P. ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Unstable Angina/Non ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction): developed in collaboration with the American College of Emergency Physicians, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons: endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. Circulation 2007;116:e148–304

11. Harrington RA, Becker RC, Cannon CP, Gutterman D, Lincoff AM, Popma JJ, Steg G, Guyatt GH, Goodman SG. Antithrombotic therapy for non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Chest 2008;133:670S–707S

12. Fraker TD Jr, Fihn SD, Gibbons RJ, Abrams J, Chatterjee K, Daley J, Deedwania PC, Douglas JS, Ferguson TB Jr, Fihn SD, Fraker TD Jr, Gardin JM, O'Rourke RA, Williams SV, Smith SC Jr, Jacobs AK, Adams CD, Anderson JL, Buller CE, Creager MA, Ettinger SM, Halperin JL, Hunt SA, Krumholz HM, Kushner FG, Lytle BW, Nishimura R, Page RL, Riegel B, Tarkington LG, Yancy CW. 2007 chronic angina focused update of the ACC/AHA 2002 guidelines for the management of patients with chronic stable angina: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines Writing Group to develop the focused update of the 2002 guidelines for the management of patients with chronic stable angina. Circulation 2007;116:2762–72

13. Grines CL, Bonow RO, Casey DE Jr, Gardner TJ, Lockhart PB, Moliterno DJ, O'Gara P, Whitlow P. Prevention of premature discontinuation of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery stents: a science advisory from the American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, American College of Surgeons, and American Dental Association, with representation from the American College of Physicians. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2007;69:334–40

14. Helton TJ, Bavry AA, Kumbhani DJ, Duggal S, Roukoz H, Bhatt DL. Incremental effect of clopidogrel on important outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 2007;7:289–97

15. King SB III, Smith SC Jr, Hirshfeld JW Jr, Jacobs AK, Morrison DA, Williams DO, Feldman TE, Kern MJ, O'Neill WW, Schaff HV, Whitlow PL, Adams CD, Anderson JL, Buller CE, Creager MA, Ettinger SM, Halperin JL, Hunt SA, Krumholz HM, Kushner FG, Lytle BW, Nishimura R, Page RL, Riegel B, Tarkington LG, Yancy CW. 2007 focused update of the ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines: 2007 Writing Group to Review New Evidence and Update the ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 Guideline Update for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Writing on Behalf of the 2005 Writing Committee. Circulation 2008;117:261–95

16. Mangano DT. Aspirin and mortality from coronary bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1309–17

17. Sun JC, Whitlock R, Cheng J, Eikelboom JW, Thabane L, Crowther MA, Teoh KH. The effect of pre-operative aspirin on bleeding, transfusion, myocardial infarction, and mortality in coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review of randomized and observational studies. Eur Heart J 2008;29:1057–71

18. Purkayastha S, Athanasiou T, Malinovski V, Tekkis P, Foale R, Casula R, Glenville B, Darzi A. Does clopidogrel affect outcome after coronary artery bypass grafting? A meta-analysis. Heart 2006;92:531–2

19. Dunning J, Versteegh M, Fabbri A, Pavie A, Kolh P, Lockowandt U, Nashef SA; EACTS Audit and Guidelines Committee. Guideline on antiplatelet and anticoagulation management in cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2008;34:73–92

20. Zimmermann N, Gams E, Hohlfeld T. Aspirin in coronary artery bypass surgery: new aspects of and alternatives for an old antithrombotic agent. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2008;34:93–108

21. Eidelman RS, Hebert PR, Weisman SM, Hennekens CH. An update on aspirin in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Arch Intern Med 2003;163:2006–10

22. Hayden M, Pignone M, Phillips C, Mulrow C. Aspirin for the primary prevention of cardiovascular events: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2002;136:161–72

23. Becker RC, Meade TW, Berger PB, Ezekowitz M, O'Connor CM, Vorchheimer DA, Guyatt GH, Mark DB, Harrington RA. The primary and secondary prevention of coronary artery disease: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Chest 2008;133:776S–814S

24. Robless P, Mikhailidis DP, Stansby G. Systematic review of antiplatelet therapy for the prevention of myocardial infarction, stroke or vascular death in patients with peripheral vascular disease. Br J Surg 2001;88:787–800

25. Weisman SM, Graham DY. Evaluation of the benefits and risks of low-dose aspirin in the secondary prevention of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events. Arch Intern Med 2002;162:2197–202

26. Burger W, Chemnitius JM, Kneissl GD, Rucker G. Low-dose aspirin for secondary cardiovascular prevention: cardiovascular risks after its perioperative withdrawal versus bleeding risks with its continuation—review and meta-analysis. J Intern Med 2005;257:399–414

27. Berger JS, Krantz MJ, Kittelson JM, Hiatt WR. Aspirin for the prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with peripheral artery disease: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. JAMA 2009;301:1909–19

28. Hiatt WR. Preventing atherothrombotic events in peripheral arterial disease: the use of antiplatelet therapy. J Intern Med 2002;251:193–206

29. Girolami B, Bernardi E, Prins MH, ten Cate JW, Prandoni P, Simioni P, Andreozzi GM, Girolami A, Büller HR. Antiplatelet therapy and other interventions after revascularisation procedures in patients with peripheral arterial disease: a meta-analysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2000;19:370–80

30. Hirsch AT, Haskal ZJ, Hertzer NR, Bakal CW, Creager MA, Halperin JL, Hiratzka LF, Murphy WR, Olin JW, Puschett JB, Rosenfield KA, Sacks D, Stanley JC, Taylor LM Jr, White CJ, White J, White RA, Antman EM, Smith SC Jr, Adams CD, Anderson JL, Faxon DP, Fuster V, Gibbons RJ, Hunt SA, Jacobs AK, Nishimura R, Ornato JP, Page RL, Riegel B. ACC/AHA 2005 practice guidelines for the management of patients with peripheral arterial disease (lower extremity, renal, mesenteric, and abdominal aortic): a collaborative report from the American Association for Vascular Surgery/Society for Vascular Surgery, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, Society of Interventional Radiology, and the ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease): endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Society for Vascular Nursing; TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus; and Vascular Disease Foundation. Circulation 2006;113:e463–654

31. Sobel M, Verhaeghe R. Antithrombotic therapy for peripheral artery occlusive disease: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Chest 2008;133:815S–43S

32. Singer DE, Albers GW, Dalen JE, Fang MC, Go AS, Halperin JL, Lip GY, Manning WJ. Antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Chest 2008;133:546S–92S

33. Gladding P, Webster M, Ormiston J, Olsen S, White H. Antiplatelet drug nonresponsiveness. Am Heart J 2008;155:591–9

34. Newsome LT, Weller RS, Gerancher JC, Kutcher MA, Royster RL. Coronary artery stents. II. Perioperative considerations and management. Anesth Analg 2008;107:570–90

35. Patrono C, Baigent C, Hirsh J, Roth G. Antiplatelet drugs: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Chest 2008;133: 199S–233S

36. Benedek IH, Joshi AS, Pieniaszek HJ, King SY, Kornhauser DM. Variability in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of low dose aspirin in healthy male volunteers. J Clin Pharmacol 1995;35:1181–6

37. Buerke M, Pittroff W, Meyer J, Darius H. Aspirin therapy: optimized platelet inhibition with different loading and maintenance doses. Am Heart J 1995;130:465–72

38. Bochner F, Williams DB, Morris PM, Siebert DM, Lloyd JV. Pharmacokinetics of low-dose oral modified release, soluble and intravenous aspirin in man, and effects on platelet function. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1988;35:287–94

39. Roth GJ, Stanford N, Majerus PW. Acetylation of prostaglandin synthase by aspirin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1975;72:3073–6

40. Burch JW, Stanford N, Majerus PW. Inhibition of platelet prostaglandin synthetase by oral aspirin. J Clin Invest 1978;61:314–9

41. Vane JR, Botting RM. New insights into the mode of action of anti-inflammatory drugs. Inflamm Res 1995;44:1–10

42. Catella-Lawson F, Reilly MP, Kapoor SC, Cucchiara AJ, DeMarco S, Tournier B, Vyas SN, FitzGerald GA. Cyclooxygenase inhibitors and the antiplatelet effects of aspirin. N Engl J Med 2001;345:1809–17

43. Patrignani P, Filabozzi P, Patrono C. Selective cumulative inhibition of platelet thromboxane production by low-dose aspirin in healthy subjects. J Clin Invest 1982;69:1366–72

44. Hansson L, Zanchetti A, Carruthers SG, Dahlöf B, Elmfeldt D, Julius S, Ménard J, Rahn KH, Wedel H, Westerling S. Effects of intensive blood-pressure lowering and low-dose aspirin in patients with hypertension: principal results of the Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) randomised trial. HOT Study Group. Lancet 1998;351:1755–62

45. Pierucci A, Simonetti BM, Pecci G, Mavrikakis G, Feriozzi S, Cinotti GA, Patrignani P, Ciabattoni G, Patrono C. Improvement of renal function with selective thromboxane antagonism in lupus nephritis. N Engl J Med 1989;320:421–5

46. Teo KK, Yusuf S, Pfeffer M, Torp-Pedersen C, Kober L, Hall A, Pogue J, Latini R, Collins R; ACE Inhibitors Collaborative Group. Effects of long-term treatment with angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors in the presence or absence of aspirin: a systematic review. Lancet 2002;360:1037–43

47. Serebruany VL, Malinin AI, Eisert RM, Sane DC. Risk of bleeding complications with antiplatelet agents: meta-analysis of 338,191 patients enrolled in 50 randomized controlled trials. Am J Hematol 2004;75:40–7

48. Derry S, Loke YK. Risk of gastrointestinal haemorrhage with long term use of aspirin: meta-analysis. BMJ 2000;321:1183–7

49. Lai KC, Lam SK, Chu KM, Wong BC, Hui WM, Hu WH, Lau GK, Wong WM, Yuen MF, Chan AO, Lai CL, Wong J. Lansoprazole for the prevention of recurrences of ulcer complications from long-term low-dose aspirin use. N Engl J Med 2002;346:2033–8

50. Capone ML, Sciulli MG, Tacconelli S, Grana M, Ricciotti E, Renda G, Di Gregorio P, Merciaro G, Patrignani P. Pharmacodynamic interaction of naproxen with low-dose aspirin in healthy subjects. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:1295–301

51. MacDonald TM, Wei L. Effect of ibuprofen on cardioprotective effect of aspirin. Lancet 2003;361:573–4

52. Kurth T, Glynn RJ, Walker AM, Chan KA, Buring JE, Hennekens CH, Gaziano JM. Inhibition of clinical benefits of aspirin on first myocardial infarction by nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. Circulation 2003;108:1191–5

53. Gladding PA, Webster MW, Farrell HB, Zeng IS, Park R, Ruijne N. The antiplatelet effect of six non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and their pharmacodynamic interaction with aspirin in healthy volunteers. Am J Cardiol 2008;101:1060–3

54. Kimmel SE, Berlin JA, Kinman JL, Hennessy S, Feldman H, Carson JL, Strom BL. Parenteral ketorolac and risk of myocardial infarction. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2002;11: 113–9

55. Kearney PM, Baigent C, Godwin J, Halls H, Emberson JR, Patrono C. Do selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors and traditional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs increase the risk of atherothrombosis? Meta-analysis of randomised trials. BMJ 2006;332:1302–8

56. Antman EM, Bennett JS, Daugherty A, Furberg C, Roberts H, Taubert KA. Use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs: an update for clinicians—a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2007;115:1634–42

57. Waksman JC, Brody A, Phillips SD. Nonselective nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and cardiovascular risk: are they safe? Ann Pharmacother 2007;41:1163–73

58. Graham DJ, Campen D, Hui R, Spence M, Cheetham C, Levy G, Shoor S, Ray WA. Risk of acute myocardial infarction and sudden cardiac death in patients treated with cyclo-oxygenase 2 selective and non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: nested case-control study. Lancet 2005;365:475–81

59. Nussmeier NA, Whelton AA, Brown MT, Langford RM, Hoeft A, Parlow JL, Boyce SW, Verburg KM. Complications of the COX-2 inhibitors parecoxib and valdecoxib after cardiac surgery. N Engl J Med 2005;352:1081–91

60. Angiolillo DJ. Variability in responsiveness to oral antiplatelet therapy. Am J Cardiol 2009;103:27A–34A

61. Cattaneo M. Resistance to antiplatelet drugs: molecular mechanisms and laboratory detection. J Thromb Haemost 2007;5:230–7

62. Hovens MM, Snoep JD, Eikenboom JC, van der Bom JG, Mertens BJ, Huisman MV. Prevalence of persistent platelet reactivity despite use of aspirin: a systematic review. Am Heart J 2007;153:175–81

63. Krasopoulos G, Brister SJ, Beattie WS, Buchanan MR. Aspirin “resistance” and risk of cardiovascular morbidity: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2008;336:195–8

64. Schwartz KA, Schwartz DE, Ghosheh K, Reeves MJ, Barber K, DeFranco A. Compliance as a critical consideration in patients who appear to be resistant to aspirin after healing of myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 2005;95:973–5

65. Serebruany VL, Midei MG, Meilman H, Malinin AI, Lowry DR. Rebound platelet activation after termination of prasugrel and aspirin therapy due to confirmed non-compliance in patient enrolled in the JUMBO Trial. Int J Clin Pract 2006;60:863–6

66. Eikelboom JW, Hankey GJ, Thom J, Bhatt DL, Steg PG, Montalescot G, Johnston SC, Steinhubl SR, Mak KH, Easton JD, Hamm C, Hu T, Fox KA, Topol EJ. Incomplete inhibition of thromboxane biosynthesis by acetylsalicylic acid: determinants and effect on cardiovascular risk. Circulation 2008;118:1705–12

67. Christiaens L, Macchi L. Monitoring of the antiplatelet drugs effect in patients with coronary artery disease: what is the real clinical impact? Curr Vasc Pharmacol 2007;5:293–301

68. Bonello L, Camoin-Jau L, Arques S, Boyer C, Panagides D, Wittenberg O, Simeoni MC, Barragan P, Dignat-George F, Paganelli F. Adjusted clopidogrel loading doses according to vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation index decrease rate of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with clopidogrel resistance: a multicenter randomized prospective study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:1404–11

69. Cipollone F, Ciabattoni G, Patrignani P, Pasquale M, Di Gregorio D, Bucciarelli T, Davì G, Cuccurullo F, Patrono C. Oxidant stress and aspirin-insensitive thromboxane biosynthesis in severe unstable angina. Circulation 2000;102:1007–13

70. Marcucci R, Paniccia R, Antonucci E, Gori AM, Fedi S, Giglioli C, Valente S, Prisco D, Abbate R, Gensini GF. Usefulness of aspirin resistance after percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction in predicting one-year major adverse coronary events. Am J Cardiol 2006;98:1156–9

71. DiChiara J, Bliden KP, Tantry US, Hamed MS, Antonino MJ, Suarez TA, Bailon O, Singla A, Gurbel PA. The effect of aspirin dosing on platelet function in diabetic and nondiabetic patients: an analysis from the aspirin-induced platelet effect (ASPECT) study. Diabetes 2007;56:3014–9

72. Hall RI, MacLaren C, Smith MS, McIntyre AJ, Allen CT, Murphy JT, Sullivan J, Wood J, Ali I, Kinley E. Light versus heavy sedation after cardiac surgery: myocardial ischemia and the stress response. Maritime Heart Centre and Dalhousie University. Anesth Analg 1997;85:971–8

73. Fabre JE, Gurney ME. Limitations of current therapies to prevent thrombosis: a need for novel strategies. Mol Biosyst 2010;6:305–15

74. Gurbel PA, Bliden KP, Kreutz RP, Dichiara J, Antonino MJ, Tantry US. The link between heightened thrombogenicity and inflammation: pre-procedure characterization of the patient at high risk for recurrent events after stenting. Platelets 2009;20:97–104

75. van der Poll T, Büller HR, ten Cate H, Wortel CH, Bauer KA, van Deventer SJ, Hack CE, Sauerwein HP, Rosenberg RD, ten Cate JW. Activation of coagulation after administration of tumor necrosis factor to normal subjects. N Engl J Med 1990;322:1622–7

76. Aird WC. Vascular bed-specific hemostasis: role of endothelium in sepsis pathogenesis. Crit Care Med 2001;29: S28–S34

77. Steinhubl SR, Badimon JJ, Bhatt DL, Herbert JM, Lüscher TF. Clinical evidence for anti-inflammatory effects of antiplatelet therapy in patients with atherothrombotic disease. Vasc Med 2007;12:113–22

78. Philbin DM, Rosow CE, Schneider RC, Koski G, D'Ambra MN. Fentanyl and sufentanil anesthesia revisited: how much is enough? Anesthesiology 1990;73:5–11

79. Rough J, Engldahl R, Opperman K, Yerrum S, Monroy MA, Daly JM. Beta2 adrenoreceptor blockade attenuates the hyperinflammatory response induced by traumatic injury. Surgery 2009;145:235–42

80. Flierl MA, Rittirsch D, Nadeau BA, Sarma JV, Day DE, Lentsch AB, Huber-Lang MS, Ward PA. Upregulation of phagocyte-derived catecholamines augments the acute inflammatory response. PLoS One 2009;4:e4414

81. Anfossi G, Trovati M. Role of catecholamines in platelet function: pathophysiological and clinical significance. Eur J Clin Invest 1996;26:353–70

82. Béres BJ, Tóth-Zsámboki E, Vargová K, László A, Masszi T, Kerecsen G, Préda I, Kiss RG. Analysis of platelet alpha2-adrenergic receptor activity in stable coronary artery disease patients on dual antiplatelet therapy. Thromb Haemost 2008;100:829–38

83. Larsson PT, Wallen NH, Hjemdahl P. Norepinephrine-induced human platelet activation in vivo is only partly counteracted by aspirin. Circulation 1994;89:1951–7

84. Golanski J, Golanski R, Chizynski K, Iwaszkiewicz A, Rozalski M, Wieclawska B, Boncler M, Watala C. Platelet hyperreactivity after coronary artery bypass grafting: the possible relevance to glycoprotein polymorphisms—a preliminary report. Platelets 2001;12:241–7

85. Feher G, Feher A, Pusch G, Lupkovics G, Szapary L, Papp E. The genetics of antiplatelet drug resistance. Clin Genet 2009;75:1–18

86. Zimmermann N, Kurt M, Wenk A, Winter J, Gams E, Hohlfeld T. Is cardiopulmonary bypass a reason for aspirin resistance after coronary artery bypass grafting? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005;27:606–10

87. Hu A, Jiao X, Gao E, Koch WJ, Sharifi-Azad S, Grunwald Z, Ma XL, Sun JZ. Chronic beta-adrenergic receptor stimulation induces cardiac apoptosis and aggravates myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury by provoking inducible nitric-oxide synthase-mediated nitrative stress. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2006;318:469–75

88. Golański J, Chłopicki S, Golański R, Gresner P, Iwaszkiewicz A, Watala C. Resistance to aspirin in patients after coronary artery bypass grafting is transient: impact on the monitoring of aspirin antiplatelet therapy. Ther Drug Monit 2005;27: 484–90

89. Mardikar H, Deo D, Deshpande N, Mardikar M, Ghosh A, Munot K, Steinhubl S, Mukherjee D. Variability in platelet response to a single daily dose of 150 mg enteric coated aspirin in a high risk population. J Assoc Physicians India 2008;56:321–4

90. Lordkipanidze M, Pharand C, Palisaitis DA, Diodati JG. Aspirin resistance: truth or dare. Pharmacol Ther 2006;112: 733–43

91. Hankey GJ, Eikelboom JW. Aspirin resistance. Lancet 2006;367:606–17

92. Abaci A, Yilmaz Y, Caliskan M, Bayram F, Cetin M, Unal A, Cetin S. Effect of increasing doses of aspirin on platelet function as measured by PFA-100 in patients with diabetes. Thromb Res 2005;116:465–70

93. Cornelissen J, Kirtland S, Lim E, Goddard M, Bellm S, Sheridan K, Large S, Vuylsteke A. Biological efficacy of low against medium dose aspirin regimen after coronary surgery: analysis of platelet function. Thromb Haemost 2006;95: 476–82

94. Lim E, Ali Z, Ali A, Routledge T, Edmonds L, Altman DG, Large S. Indirect comparison meta-analysis of aspirin therapy after coronary surgery. BMJ 2003;327:1309

95. Duzenli MA, Ozdemir K, Aygul N, Soylu A, Tokac M. Comparison of increased aspirin dose versus combined aspirin plus clopidogrel therapy in patients with diabetes mellitus and coronary heart disease and impaired antiplatelet response to low-dose aspirin. Am J Cardiol 2008;102:396–400

96. Lev EI, Patel RT, Maresh KJ, Guthikonda S, Granada J, DeLao T, Bray PF, Kleiman NS. Aspirin and clopidogrel drug response in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the role of dual drug resistance. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:27–33

97. Sanderson S, Emery J, Baglin T, Kinmonth AL. Narrative review: aspirin resistance and its clinical implications. Ann Intern Med 2005;142:370–80

98. Pamukcu B. A review of aspirin resistance: definition, possible mechanisms, detection with platelet function tests, and its clinical outcomes. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2007;23:213–22

99. Macchi L, Sorel N, Christiaens L. Aspirin resistance: definitions, mechanisms, prevalence, and clinical significance. Curr Pharm Des 2006;12:251–8

100. Michelson AD, Cattaneo M, Eikelboom JW, Gurbel P, Kottke-Marchant K, Kunicki TJ, Pulcinelli FM, Cerletti C, Rao AK. Aspirin resistance: position paper of the Working Group on Aspirin Resistance. J Thromb Haemost 2005;3:1309–11

101. Frelinger AL III, Furman MI, Linden MD, Li Y, Fox ML, Barnard MR, Michelson AD. Residual arachidonic acid-induced platelet activation via an adenosine diphosphate-dependent but cyclooxygenase-1- and cyclooxygenase-2-independent pathway: a 700-patient study of aspirin resistance. Circulation 2006;113:2888–96

102. Wang TH, Bhatt DL, Topol EJ. Aspirin and clopidogrel resistance: an emerging clinical entity. Eur Heart J 2006;27:647–54

103. CAPRIE Steering Committee. A randomised, blinded, trial of clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischaemic events (CAPRIE). Lancet 1996;348:1329–39

104. Serebruany VL, Malinin AI, Ferguson JJ, Vahabi J, Atar D, Hennekens CH. Bleeding risks of combination vs. single antiplatelet therapy: a meta-analysis of 18 randomized trials comprising 129,314 patients. Fundam Clin Pharmacol 2008;22:315–21

105. Adams RJ, Albers G, Alberts MJ, Benavente O, Furie K, Goldstein LB, Gorelick P, Halperin J, Harbaugh R, Johnston SC, Katzan I, Kelly-Hayes M, Kenton EJ, Marks M, Sacco RL, Schwamm LH. Update to the AHA/ASA recommendations for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack. Stroke 2008;39:1647–52

106. Fleisher LA, Beckman JA, Brown KA, Calkins H, Chaikof E, Fleischmann KE, Freeman WK, Froehlich JB, Kasper EK, Kersten JR, Riegel B, Robb JF, Smith SC Jr, Jacobs AK, Adams CD, Anderson JL, Antman EM, Buller CE, Creager MA, Ettinger SM, Faxon DP, Fuster V, Halperin JL, Hiratzka LF, Hunt SA, Lytle BW, Nishimura R, Ornato JP, Page RL, Tarkington LG, Yancy CW. ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and care for noncardiac surgery: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery): developed in collaboration with the American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Rhythm Society, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, and Society for Vascular Surgery. Circulation 2007;116:e418–99

107. Smith SC Jr, Feldman TE, Hirshfeld JW Jr, Jacobs AK, Kern MJ, King SB III, Morrison DA, O'Neill WW, Schaff HV, Whitlow PL, Williams DO, Antman EM, Smith SC Jr, Adams CD, Anderson JL, Faxon DP, Fuster V, Halperin JL, Hiratzka LF, Hunt SA, Jacobs AK, Nishimura R, Ornato JP, Page RL, Riegel B. ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention—summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/SCAI Writing Committee to Update the 2001 Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention). J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:216–35

108. Taubert D, Kastrati A, Harlfinger S, Gorchakova O, Lazar A, von Beckerath N, Schömig A, Schömig E. Pharmacokinetics of clopidogrel after administration of a high loading dose. Thromb Haemost 2004;92:311–6

109. Lins R, Broekhuysen J, Necciari J, Deroubaix X. Pharmacokinetic profile of 14C-labeled clopidogrel. Semin Thromb Hemost 1999;25:29–33

110. Hulot JS, Bura A, Villard E, Azizi M, Remones V, Goyenvalle C, Aiach M, Lechat P, Gaussem P. Cytochrome P450 2C19 loss-of-function polymorphism is a major determinant of clopidogrel responsiveness in healthy subjects. Blood 2006;108:2244–7

111. Farid NA, Payne CD, Small DS, Winters KJ, Ernest CS II, Brandt JT, Darstein C, Jakubowski JA, Salazar DE. Cytochrome P450 3A inhibition by ketoconazole affects prasugrel and clopidogrel pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics differently. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2007;81:735–41

112. Serebruany VL, Steinhubl SR, Berger PB, Malinin AI, Bhatt DL, Topol EJ. Variability in platelet responsiveness to clopidogrel among 544 individuals. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45: 246–51

113. Shuldiner AR, O'Connell JR, Bliden KP, Gandhi A, Ryan K, Horenstein RB, Damcott CM, Pakyz R, Tantry US, Gibson Q, Pollin TI, Post W, Parsa A, Mitchell BD, Faraday N, Herzog W, Gurbel PA. Association of cytochrome P450 2C19 genotype with the antiplatelet effect and clinical efficacy of clopidogrel therapy. JAMA 2009;302:849–57

114. Simon T, Verstuyft C, Mary-Krause M, Quteineh L, Drouet E, Méneveau N, Steg PG, Ferrières J, Danchin N, Becquemont L; French Registry of Acute ST-Elevation and Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (FAST-MI) Investigators. Genetic determinants of response to clopidogrel and cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med 2009;360:363–75

115. Mega JL, Close SL, Wiviott SD, Shen L, Hockett RD, Brandt JT, Walker JR, Antman EM, Macias W, Braunwald E, Sabatine MS. Cytochrome p-450 polymorphisms and response to clopidogrel. N Engl J Med 2009;360:354–62

116. Bonello-Palot N, Armero S, Paganelli F, Mancini J, De Labriolle A, Bonello C, Lévy N, Maillard L, Barragan P, Dignat-George F, Camoin-Jau L, Bonello L. Relation of body mass index to high on-treatment platelet reactivity and of failed clopidogrel dose adjustment according to platelet reactivity monitoring in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 2009;104:1511–5

117. von Beckerath N, Taubert D, Pogatsa-Murray G, Schömig E, Kastrati A, Schömig A. Absorption, metabolization, and antiplatelet effects of 300-, 600-, and 900-mg loading doses of clopidogrel: results of the ISAR-CHOICE (Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen: Choose Between 3 High Oral Doses for Immediate Clopidogrel Effect) Trial. Circulation 2005;112:2946–50

118. Deray G, Bagnis C, Brouard R, Necciari J, Leenhardt AF, Raymond F, Baumelou A. Clopidogrel activities in patients with renal impairment. Clin Drug Invest 1998;16:319–28

119. Slugg PH, Much DR, Smith WB, Vargas R, Nichola P, Necciari J. Cirrhosis does not affect the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of clopidogrel. J Clin Pharmacol 2000;40: 396–401

120. Hochholzer W, Trenk D, Frundi D, Blanke P, Fischer B, Andris K, Bestehorn HP, Büttner HJ, Neumann FJ. Time dependence of platelet inhibition after a 600-mg loading dose of clopidogrel in a large, unselected cohort of candidates for percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation 2005;111:2560–4

121. Taubert D, von Beckerath N, Grimberg G, Lazar A, Jung N, Goeser T, Kastrati A, Schömig A, Schömig E. Impact of P-glycoprotein on clopidogrel absorption. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2006;80:486–501

122. Ding Z, Kim S, Dorsam RT, Jin J, Kunapuli SP. Inactivation of the human P2Y12 receptor by thiol reagents requires interaction with both extracellular cysteine residues, Cys17 and Cys270. Blood 2003;101:3908–14

123. Suh JW, Koo BK, Zhang SY, Park KW, Cho JY, Jang IJ, Lee DS, Sohn DW, Lee MM, Kim HS. Increased risk of atherothrombotic events associated with cytochrome P450 3A5 polymorphism in patients taking clopidogrel. CMAJ 2006;174:1715–22

124. Ho PM, Peterson ED, Wang L, Magid DJ, Fihn SD, Larsen GC, Jesse RA, Rumsfeld JS. Incidence of death and acute myocardial infarction associated with stopping clopidogrel after acute coronary syndrome. JAMA 2008;299:532–9

125. Sibbing D, Stegherr J, Braun S, Mehilli J, Schulz S, Seyfarth M, Kastrati A, von Beckerath N, Schömig A. A double-blind, randomized study on prevention and existence of a rebound phenomenon of platelets after cessation of clopidogrel treatment. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:558–65

126. Berger JS, Frye CB, Harshaw Q, Edwards FH, Steinhubl SR, Becker RC. Impact of clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes requiring coronary artery bypass surgery: a multicenter analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52: 1693–701

127. Chen L, Bracey AW, Radovancevic R, Cooper JR Jr, Collard CD, Vaughn WK, Nussmeier NA. Clopidogrel and bleeding in patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;128:425–31

128. Chan V, Kulik A, Bourke ME, Ressler L, Mesana TG, Ruel M. Clopidogrel is safe early after on- and off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. J Card Surg 2007;22:493–7

129. Harker LA, Boissel JP, Pilgrim AJ, Gent M. Comparative safety and tolerability of clopidogrel and aspirin: results from CAPRIE. CAPRIE Steering Committee and Investigators. Clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischaemic events. Drug Saf 1999;21:325–35

130. Bennett CL, Connors JM, Carwile JM, Moake JL, Bell WR, Tarantolo SR, McCarthy LJ, Sarode R, Hatfield AJ, Feldman MD, Davidson CJ, Tsai HM. Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura associated with clopidogrel. N Engl J Med 2000;342:1773–7

131. Lau WC, Waskell LA, Watkins PB, Neer CJ, Horowitz K, Hopp AS, Tait AR, Carville DG, Guyer KE, Bates ER. Atorvastatin reduces the ability of clopidogrel to inhibit platelet aggregation: a new drug-drug interaction. Circulation 2003;107:32–7

132. Paine MF, Hart HL, Ludington SS, Haining RL, Rettie AE, Zeldin DC. The human intestinal cytochrome P450 “pie.” Drug Metab Dispos 2006;34:880–6

133. Saw J, Brennan DM, Steinhubl SR, Bhatt DL, Mak KH, Fox K, Topol EJ. Lack of evidence of a clopidogrel-statin interaction in the CHARISMA trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50:291–5

134. Lotfi A, Schweiger MJ, Giugliano GR, Murphy SA, Cannon CP. High-dose atorvastatin does not negatively influence clinical outcomes among clopidogrel treated acute coronary syndrome patients: a Pravastatin or Atorvastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 22 (PROVE IT-TIMI 22) analysis. Am Heart J 2008;155:954–8

135. Trenk D, Hochholzer W, Frundi D, Stratz C, Valina CM, Bestehorn HP, Büttner HJ, Neumann FJ. Impact of cytochrome P450 3A4-metabolized statins on the antiplatelet effect of a 600-mg loading dose clopidogrel and on clinical outcome in patients undergoing elective coronary stent placement. Thromb Haemost 2008;99:174–81

136. Brophy JM, Babapulle MN, Costa V, Rinfret S. A pharmacoepidemiology study of the interaction between atorvastatin and clopidogrel after percutaneous coronary intervention. Am Heart J 2006;152:263–9

137. Neubauer H, Mugge A. Thienopyridines and statins: assessing a potential drug-drug interaction. Curr Pharm Des 2006;12:1271–80

138. Gilard M, Arnaud B, Cornily JC, Le Gal G, Lacut K, Le Calvez G, Mansourati J, Mottier D, Abgrall JF, Boschat J. Influence of omeprazole on the antiplatelet action of clopidogrel associated with aspirin: the randomized, double-blind OCLA (Omeprazole CLopidogrel Aspirin) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:256–60

139. Small DS, Farid NA, Payne CD, Weerakkody GJ, Li YG, Brandt JT, Salazar DE, Winters KJ. Effects of the proton pump inhibitor lansoprazole on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of prasugrel and clopidogrel. J Clin Pharmacol 2008;48:475–84

140. Ho PM, Maddox TM, Wang L, Fihn SD, Jesse RL, Peterson ED, Rumsfeld JS. Risk of adverse outcomes associated with concomitant use of clopidogrel and proton pump inhibitors following acute coronary syndrome. JAMA 2009;301:937–44

141. Rassen JA, Choudhry NK, Avorn J, Schneeweiss S. Cardiovascular outcomes and mortality in patients using clopidogrel with proton pump inhibitors after percutaneous coronary intervention or acute coronary syndrome. Circulation 2009;120:2322–9

142. Juurlink DN, Gomes T, Ko DT, Szmitko PE, Austin PC, Tu JV, Henry DA, Kopp A, Mamdani MM. A population-based study of the drug interaction between proton pump inhibitors and clopidogrel. CMAJ 2009;180:713–8

143. Bhatt DL, Scheiman J, Abraham NS, Antman EM, Chan FK, Furberg CD, Johnson DA, Mahaffey KW, Quigley EM. ACCF/ACG/AHA 2008 expert consensus document on reducing the gastrointestinal risks of antiplatelet therapy and NSAID use: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. Circulation 2008;118:1894–909

144. Hirota K, Kudo M, Hashimoto H, Kushikata T. The efficacy of preanesthetic proton pump inhibitor treatment for patients on long-term H2 antagonist therapy. Anesth Analg 2005;101:1038–41

145. Devlin JW, Welage LS, Olsen KM. Proton pump inhibitor formulary considerations in the acutely ill. Part 2. Clinical efficacy, safety, and economics. Ann Pharmacother 2005;39:1844–51

146. Ivandic BT, Schlick P, Staritz P, Kurz K, Katus HA, Giannitsis E. Determination of clopidogrel resistance by whole blood platelet aggregometry and inhibitors of the P2Y12 receptor. Clin Chem 2006;52:383–8

147. Snoep JD, Hovens MM, Eikenboom JC, van der Bom JG, Jukema JW, Huisman MV. Clopidogrel nonresponsiveness in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am Heart J 2007;154:221–31

148. Matetzky S, Shenkman B, Guetta V, Shechter M, Bienart R, Goldenberg I, Novikov I, Pres H, Savion N, Varon D, Hod H. Clopidogrel resistance is associated with increased risk of recurrent atherothrombotic events in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 2004;109:3171–5

149. Wiviott SD. Clopidogrel response variability, resistance, or both? Am J Cardiol 2006;98:18N–24N

150. Serebruany VL. The “clopidogrel resistance” trap. Am J Cardiol 2007;100:1044–6

151. Jackevicius CA, Tu JV, Demers V, Melo M, Cox J, Rinfret S, Kalavrouziotis D, Johansen H, Behlouli H, Newman A, Pilote L. Cardiovascular outcomes after a change in prescription policy for clopidogrel. N Engl J Med 2008;359:1802–10

152. Spertus JA, Kettelkamp R, Vance C, Decker C, Jones PG, Rumsfeld JS, Messenger JC, Khanal S, Peterson ED, Bach RG, Krumholz HM, Cohen DJ. Prevalence, predictors, and outcomes of premature discontinuation of thienopyridine therapy after drug-eluting stent placement: results from the PREMIER registry. Circulation 2006;113:2803–9

153. Gurbel PA, Bliden KP, Hiatt BL, O'Connor CM. Clopidogrel for coronary stenting: response variability, drug resistance, and the effect of pretreatment platelet reactivity. Circulation 2003;107:2908–13

154. Michelson AD, Frelinger AL, Furman MI. Resistance to antiplatelet drugs. Eur Heart J 2006;8:G53–8

155. Tassies D. Pharmacogenetics of antithrombotic drugs. Curr Pharm Des 2006;12:2425–35

156. Siller-Matula J, Schror K, Wojta J, Huber K. Thienopyridines in cardiovascular disease: focus on clopidogrel resistance. Thromb Haemost 2007;97:385–93

157. Pena A, Collet JP, Hulot JS, Silvain J, Barthélémy O, Beygui F, Funck-Brentano C, Montalescot G. Can we override clopidogrel resistance? Circulation 2009;119:2854–7

158. Gori AM, Marcucci R, Migliorini A, Valenti R, Moschi G, Paniccia R, Buonamici P, Gensini GF, Vergara R, Abbate R, Antoniucci D. Incidence and clinical impact of dual nonresponsiveness to aspirin and clopidogrel in patients with drug-eluting stents. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:734–9

159. Gurbel PA, Bliden KP, Hayes KM, Yoho JA, Herzog WR, Tantry US. The relation of dosing to clopidogrel responsiveness and the incidence of high post-treatment platelet aggregation in patients undergoing coronary stenting. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:1392–6

160. Fontana P, Senouf D, Mach F. Biological effect of increased maintenance dose of clopidogrel in cardiovascular outpatients and influence of the cytochrome P450 2C19*2 allele on clopidogrel responsiveness. Thromb Res 2008;121:463–8

161. Abuzahra M, Pillai M, Caldera A, Hartley WB, Gonzalez R, Bobek J, Dokainish H, Lakkis N. Comparison of higher clopidogrel loading and maintenance dose to standard dose on platelet function and outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention using drug-eluting stents. Am J Cardiol 2008;102:401–3

162. Perneby C, Wallén NH, Hofman-Bang C, Tornvall P, Ivert T, Li N, Hjemdahl P. Effect of clopidogrel treatment on stress-induced platelet activation and myocardial ischemia in aspirin-treated patients with stable coronary artery disease. Thromb Haemost 2007;98:1316–22

163. Lim E, Cornelissen J, Routledge T, Kirtland S, Charman SC, Bellm S, Munday H, Khan O, Masood I, Large S. Clopidogrel did not inhibit platelet function early after coronary bypass surgery: a prospective randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;128:432–5

164. Erlinge D, Varenhorst C, Braun OO, James S, Winters KJ, Jakubowski JA, Brandt JT, Sugidachi A, Siegbahn A, Wallentin L. Patients with poor responsiveness to thienopyridine treatment or with diabetes have lower levels of circulating active metabolite, but their platelets respond normally to active metabolite added ex vivo. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:1968–77

165. Marcucci R, Paniccia R, Antonucci E, Poli S, Gori AM, Valente S, Giglioli C, Lazzeri C, Prisco D, Abbate R, Gensini GF. Residual platelet reactivity is an independent predictor of myocardial injury in acute myocardial infarction patients on antiaggregant therapy. Thromb Haemost 2007;98:844–51

166. David JL, Limet R. Antiplatelet activity of clopidogrel in coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients. Thromb Haemost 1999;82:1417–21

167. Angiolillo DJ, Bhatt DL, Gurbel PA, Jennings LK. Advances in antiplatelet therapy: agents in clinical development. Am J Cardiol 2009;103:40A–51A

168. Niitsu Y, Jakubowski JA, Sugidachi A, Asai F. Pharmacology of CS-747 (prasugrel, LY640315), a novel, potent antiplatelet agent with in vivo P2Y12 receptor antagonist activity. Semin Thromb Hemost 2005;31:184–94

169. Jakubowski JA, Winters KJ, Naganuma H, Wallentin L. Prasugrel: a novel thienopyridine antiplatelet agent—a review of preclinical and clinical studies and the mechanistic basis for its distinct antiplatelet profile. Cardiovasc Drug Rev 2007;25:357–74

170. Wiviott SD, Antman EM, Winters KJ, Weerakkody G, Murphy SA, Behounek BD, Carney RJ, Lazzam C, McKay RG, McCabe CH, Braunwald E. Randomized comparison of prasugrel (CS-747, LY640315), a novel thienopyridine P2Y12 antagonist, with clopidogrel in percutaneous coronary intervention: results of the Joint Utilization of Medications to Block Platelets Optimally (JUMBO)-TIMI 26 trial. Circulation 2005;111:3366–73

171. Wiviott SD, Trenk D, Frelinger AL, O'Donoghue M, Neumann FJ, Michelson AD, Angiolillo DJ, Hod H, Montalescot G, Miller DL, Jakubowski JA, Cairns R, Murphy SA, McCabe CH, Antman EM, Braunwald E. Prasugrel compared with high loading- and maintenance-dose clopidogrel in patients with planned percutaneous coronary intervention: the Prasugrel in Comparison to Clopidogrel for Inhibition of Platelet Activation and Aggregation-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 44 trial. Circulation 2007;116:2923–32

172. Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, McCabe CH, Montalescot G, Ruzyllo W, Gottlieb S, Neumann FJ, Ardissino D, De Servi S, Murphy SA, Riesmeyer J, Weerakkody G, Gibson CM, Antman EM. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2007;357:2001–15

173. Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, McCabe CH, Horvath I, Keltai M, Herrman JP, Van de Werf F, Downey WE, Scirica BM, Murphy SA, Antman EM. Intensive oral antiplatelet therapy for reduction of ischaemic events including stent thrombosis in patients with acute coronary syndromes treated with percutaneous coronary intervention and stenting in the TRITON-TIMI 38 trial: a subanalysis of a randomised trial. Lancet 2008;371:1353–63

174. Montalescot G, Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, Murphy SA, Gibson CM, McCabe CH, Antman EM. Prasugrel compared with clopidogrel in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (TRITON-TIMI 38): double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2009;373:723–31

175. Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, Angiolillo DJ, Meisel S, Dalby AJ, Verheugt FW, Goodman SG, Corbalan R, Purdy DA, Murphy SA, McCabe CH, Antman EM. Greater clinical benefit of more intensive oral antiplatelet therapy with prasugrel in patients with diabetes mellitus in the trial to assess improvement in therapeutic outcomes by optimizing platelet inhibition with prasugrel–Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 38. Circulation 2008;118:1626–36

176. Murphy SA, Antman EM, Wiviott SD, Weerakkody G, Morocutti G, Huber K, Lopez-Sendon J, McCabe CH, Braunwald E. Reduction in recurrent cardiovascular events with prasugrel compared with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes from the TRITON-TIMI 38 trial. Eur Heart J 2008;29:2473–9

177. Sugidachi A, Asai F, Ogawa T, Inoue T, Koike H. The in vivo pharmacological profile of CS-747, a novel antiplatelet agent with platelet ADP receptor antagonist properties. Br J Pharmacol 2000;129:1439–46

178. Rehmel JL, Eckstein JA, Farid NA, Heim JB, Kasper SC, Kurihara A, Wrighton SA, Ring BJ. Interactions of two major metabolites of prasugrel, a thienopyridine antiplatelet agent, with the cytochromes P450. Drug Metab Dispos 2006;34:600–7

179. Wallentin L, Varenhorst C, James S, Erlinge D, Braun OO, Jakubowski JA, Sugidachi A, Winters KJ, Siegbahn A. Prasugrel achieves greater and faster P2Y12receptor-mediated platelet inhibition than clopidogrel due to more efficient generation of its active metabolite in aspirin-treated patients with coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 2008;29:21–30

180. Brandt JT, Close SL, Iturria SJ, Payne CD, Farid NA, Ernest CS II, Lachno DR, Salazar D, Winters KJ. Common polymorphisms of CYP2C19 and CYP2C9 affect the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic response to clopidogrel but not prasugrel. J Thromb Haemost 2007;5:2429–36

181. Farid NA, Smith RL, Gillespie TA, Rash TJ, Blair PE, Kurihara A, Goldberg MJ. The disposition of prasugrel, a novel thienopyridine, in humans. Drug Metab Dispos 2007;35:1096–104

182. Weerakkody GJ, Jakubowski JA, Brandt JT, Farid NA, Payne CD, Zhu J, Warner MR, Naganuma H, Winters KJ. Comparison of speed of onset of platelet inhibition after loading doses of clopidogrel versus prasugrel in healthy volunteers and correlation with responder status. Am J Cardiol 2007;100:331–6

183. Jakubowski JA, Payne CD, Brandt JT, Weerakkody GJ, Farid NA, Small DS, Naganuma H, Li GY, Winters KJ. The platelet inhibitory effects and pharmacokinetics of prasugrel after administration of loading and maintenance doses in healthy subjects. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 2006;47:377–84

184. Jakubowski JA, Matsushima N, Asai F, Naganuma H, Brandt JT, Hirota T, Freestone S, Winters KJ. A multiple dose study of prasugrel (CS-747), a novel thienopyridine P2Y12 inhibitor, compared with clopidogrel in healthy humans. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2007;63:421–30

185. Brandt JT, Payne CD, Wiviott SD, Weerakkody G, Farid NA, Small DS, Jakubowski JA, Naganuma H, Winters KJ. A comparison of prasugrel and clopidogrel loading doses on platelet function: magnitude of platelet inhibition is related to active metabolite formation. Am Heart J 2007;153:66.e9–66.e16

186. Braun OO, Johnell M, Varenhorst C, James S, Brandt JT, Jakubowski JA, Winters KJ, Wallentin L, Erlinge D, Siegbahn A. Greater reduction of platelet activation markers and platelet-monocyte aggregates by prasugrel compared to clopidogrel in stable coronary artery disease. Thromb Haemost 2008;100:626–33

187. Jernberg T, Payne CD, Winters KJ, Darstein C, Brandt JT, Jakubowski JA, Naganuma H, Siegbahn A, Wallentin L. Prasugrel achieves greater inhibition of platelet aggregation and a lower rate of non-responders compared with clopidogrel in aspirin-treated patients with stable coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 2006;27:1166–73

188. Weerakkody GJ, Jakubowski JA, Brandt JT, Payne CD, Naganuma H, Winters KJ. Greater inhibition of platelet aggregation and reduced response variability with prasugrel versus clopidogrel: an integrated analysis. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther 2007;12:205–12

189. Payne CD, Li YG, Brandt JT, Jakubowski JA, Small DS, Farid NA, Salazar DE, Winters KJ. Switching directly to prasugrel from clopidogrel results in greater inhibition of platelet aggregation in aspirin-treated subjects. Platelets 2008;19:275–81

190. Serebruany VL, Midei MG, Meilman H, Malinin AI, Lowry DR. Platelet inhibition with prasugrel (CS-747) compared with clopidogrel in patients undergoing coronary stenting: the subset from the JUMBO study. Postgrad Med J 2006;82:404–10

191. Bhatt DL. Intensifying platelet inhibition: navigating between Scylla and Charybdis. N Engl J Med 2007;357:2078–81

192. Antman EM, Wiviott SD, Murphy SA, Voitk J, Hasin Y, Widimsky P, Chandna H, Macias W, McCabe CH, Braunwald E. Early and late benefits of prasugrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a TRITON-TIMI 38 (TRial to Assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by Optimizing Platelet InhibitioN with Prasugrel-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction) analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:2028–33

193. Farid NA, Small DS, Payne CD, Jakubowski JA, Brandt JT, Li YG, Ernest CS, Salazar DE, Konkoy CS, Winters KJ. Effect of atorvastatin on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of prasugrel and clopidogrel in healthy subjects. Pharmacotherapy 2008;28:1483–94

194. Oestreich JH. Elinogrel, a reversible P2Y12 receptor antagonist for the treatment of acute coronary syndrome and prevention of secondary thrombotic events. Curr Opin Investig Drugs 2010;11:340–8

195. Michelson AD. New P2Y12 antagonists. Curr Opin Hematol 2009;16:371–7

196. Berger JS, Roe MT, Gibson CM, Kilaru R, Green CL, Melton L, Blankenship JD, Metzger DC, Granger CB, Gretler DD, Grines CL, Huber K, Zeymer U, Buszman P, Harrington RA, Armstrong PW. Safety and feasibility of adjunctive antiplatelet therapy with intravenous elinogrel, a direct-acting and reversible P2Y12 ADP-receptor antagonist, before primary percutaneous intervention in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the Early Rapid ReversAl of platelet thromboSis with intravenous Elinogrel before PCI to optimize reperfusion in acute Myocardial Infarction (ERASE MI) pilot trial. Am Heart J 2009;158:998–1004

197. Gurbel PA, Bliden KP, Antonino MJ, Stephens G, Gretler DD, Jurek MM, Pakyz RE, Shuldiner AR, Conley PB, Tantry US. The effect of elinogrel on high platelet reactivity during dual antiplatelet therapy and the relation to CYP2C19*2 genotype: first experience in patients. J Thromb Haemost 2010;8:43–53

198. Cattaneo M. Platelet P2 receptors: old and new targets for antithrombotic drugs. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2007;5: 45–55

199. Storey RF, Oldroyd KG, Wilcox RG. Open multicentre study of the P2T receptor antagonist AR-C69931MX assessing safety, tolerability and activity in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Thromb Haemost 2001;85:401–7

200. Jacobsson F, Swahn E, Wallentin L, Ellborg M. Safety profile and tolerability of intravenous AR-C69931MX, a new antiplatelet drug, in unstable angina pectoris and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. Clin Ther 2002;24:752–65

201. Greenbaum AB, Ohman EM, Gibson CM, Borzak S, Stebbins AL, Lu M, Le May MR, Stankowski JE, Emanuelsson H, Weaver WD. Preliminary experience with intravenous P2Y12 platelet receptor inhibition as an adjunct to reduced-dose alteplase during acute myocardial infarction: results of the Safety, Tolerability and Effect on Patency in Acute Myocardial Infarction (STEP-AMI) angiographic trial. Am Heart J 2007;154:702–9

202. Bhatt DL, Lincoff AM, Gibson CM, Stone GW, McNulty S, Montalescot G, Kleiman NS, Goodman SG, White HD, Mahaffey KW, Pollack CV Jr, Manoukian SV, Widimsky P, Chew DP, Cura F, Manukov I, Tousek F, Jafar MZ, Arneja J, Skerjanec S, Harrington RA. Intravenous platelet blockade with cangrelor during PCI. N Engl J Med 2009;361:2330–41

203. Harrington RA, Stone GW, McNulty S, White HD, Lincoff AM, Gibson CM, Pollack CV Jr, Montalescot G, Mahaffey KW, Kleiman NS, Goodman SG, Amine M, Angiolillo DJ, Becker RC, Chew DP, French WJ, Leisch F, Parikh KH, Skerjanec S, Bhatt DL. Platelet inhibition with cangrelor in patients undergoing PCI. N Engl J Med 2009;361:2318–29

204. Fugate SE, Cudd LA. Cangrelor for treatment of coronary thrombosis. Ann Pharmacother 2006;40:925–30

205. Ingall AH, Dixon J, Bailey A, Coombs ME, Cox D, McInally JI, Hunt SF, Kindon ND, Teobald BJ, Willis PA, Humphries RG, Leff P, Clegg JA, Smith JA, Tomlinson W. Antagonists of the platelet P2T receptor: a novel approach to antithrombotic therapy. J Med Chem 1999;42:213–20

206. Storey RF, Wilcox RG, Heptinstall S. Comparison of the pharmacodynamic effects of the platelet ADP receptor antagonists clopidogrel and AR-C69931MX in patients with ischaemic heart disease. Platelets 2002;13:407–13

207. Greenbaum AB, Grines CL, Bittl JA, Becker RC, Kereiakes DJ, Gilchrist IC, Clegg J, Stankowski JE, Grogan DR, Harrington RA, Emanuelsson H, Weaver WD. Initial experience with an intravenous P2Y12 platelet receptor antagonist in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: results from a 2-part, phase II, multicenter, randomized, placebo- and active-controlled trial. Am Heart J 2006;151:689

208. Serebruany VL, Stebbing J, Atar D. Dyspnoea after antiplatelet agents: the AZD6140 controversy. Int J Clin Pract 2007;61:529–33

209. Steinhubl SR, OH JJ, Oestreich JH, Ferraris S, Charnigo R, Akers WS. Transitioning patients from cangrelor to clopidogrel: pharmacodynamic evidence of a competitive effect. Thromb Res 2008;121:527–34

210. Springthorpe B, Bailey A, Barton P, Birkinshaw TN, Bonnert RV, Brown RC, Chapman D, Dixon J, Guile SD, Humphries RG, Hunt SF, Ince F, Ingall AH, Kirk IP, Leeson PD, Leff P, Lewis RJ, Martin BP, McGinnity DF, Mortimore MP, Paine SW, Pairaudeau G, Patel A, Rigby AJ, Riley RJ, Teobald BJ, Tomlinson W, Webborn PJ, Willis PA. From ATP to AZD6140: the discovery of an orally active reversible P2Y12 receptor antagonist for the prevention of thrombosis. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2007;17:6013–8

211. Cannon CP, Husted S, Harrington RA, Scirica BM, Emanuelsson H, Peters G, Storey RF. Safety, tolerability, and initial efficacy of AZD6140, the first reversible oral adenosine diphosphate receptor antagonist, compared with clopidogrel, in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: primary results of the DISPERSE-2 trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50:1844–51

212. Wallentin L, Becker RC, Budaj A, Cannon CP, Emanuelsson H, Held C, Horrow J, Husted S, James S, Katus H, Mahaffey KW, Scirica BM, Skene A, Steg PG, Storey RF, Harrington RA. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2009;361:1045–57

213. Schomig A. Ticagrelor: is there need for a new player in the antiplatelet-therapy field? N Engl J Med 2009;361:1108–11

214. Cannon CP, Harrington RA, James S, Ardissino D, Becker RC, Emanuelsson H, Husted S, Katus H, Keltai M, Khurmi NS, Kontny F, Lewis BS, Steg PG, Storey RF, Wojdyla D, Wallentin L. Comparison of ticagrelor with clopidogrel in patients with a planned invasive strategy for acute coronary syndromes (PLATO): a randomised double-blind study. Lancet 2010;375:283–93

215. Gurbel PA, Bliden KP, Butler K, Antonino MJ, Wei C, Teng R, Rasmussen L, Storey RF, Nielsen T, Eikelboom JW, Sabe-Affaki G, Husted S, Kereiakes DJ, Henderson D, Patel DV, Tantry US. Response to ticagrelor in clopidogrel nonresponders and responders and effect of switching therapies: the RESPOND study. Circulation 2010;121:1188–99

216. Husted S, Emanuelsson H, Heptinstall S, Sandset PM, Wickens M, Peters G. Pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and safety of the oral reversible P2Y12 antagonist AZD6140 with aspirin in patients with atherosclerosis: a double-blind comparison to clopidogrel with aspirin. Eur Heart J 2006;27:1038–47

217. Teng R, Butler K. Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, tolerability and safety of single ascending doses of ticagrelor, a reversibly binding oral P2Y(12) receptor antagonist, in healthy subjects. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2010;66:487–96

218. van Giezen JJ, Nilsson L, Berntsson P, Wissing BM, Giordanetto F, Tomlinson W, Greasley PJ. Ticagrelor binds to human P2Y(12) independently from ADP but antagonizes ADP-induced receptor signaling and platelet aggregation. J Thromb Haemost 2009;7:1556–65

219. Gurbel PA, Bliden KP, Butler K, Tantry US, Gesheff T, Wei C, Teng R, Antonino MJ, Patil SB, Karunakaran A, Kereiakes DJ, Parris C, Purdy D, Wilson V, Ledley GS, Storey RF. Randomized double-blind assessment of the ONSET and OFFSET of the antiplatelet effects of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with stable coronary artery disease: the ONSET/OFFSET study. Circulation 2009;120:2577–85

220. Storey RF, Thornton MS, Lawrance R, Husted S, Wickens M, Emanuelsson H, Cannon CP, Heptinstall S, Armstrong M. Ticagrelor yields consistent dose-dependent inhibition of ADP-induced platelet aggregation in patients with atherosclerotic disease regardless of genotypic variations in P2RY12, P2RY1, and ITGB3. Platelets 2009;20:341–8

221. Storey RF, Husted S, Harrington RA, Heptinstall S, Wilcox RG, Peters G, Wickens M, Emanuelsson H, Gurbel P, Grande P, Cannon CP. Inhibition of platelet aggregation by AZD6140, a reversible oral P2Y12 receptor antagonist, compared with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50:1852–6

222. Husted S, Storey RF, Harrington RA, Emanuelsson H, Cannon CP. Changes in inflammatory biomarkers in patients treated with ticagrelor or clopidogrel. Clin Cardiol 2010;33:206–12

223. Storey RF, Bliden KP, Patil SB, Karunakaran A, Ecob R, Butler K, Teng R, Wei C, Tantry US, Gurbel PA. Incidence of dyspnea and assessment of cardiac and pulmonary function in patients with stable coronary artery disease receiving ticagrelor, clopidogrel, or placebo in the ONSET/OFFSET study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;56:185–93

224. Gamboa A, Abraham R, Diedrich A, Shibao C, Paranjape SY, Farley G, Biaggioni I. Role of adenosine and nitric oxide on the mechanisms of action of dipyridamole. Stroke 2005;36:2170–5

225. De Schryver EL, Algra A, van Gijn J. Dipyridamole for preventing stroke and other vascular events in patients with vascular disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;3: CD001820

226. Lehmann CR, Locke K, Pierson WP, Shaffer PJ, Hall W. Persantine bioavailability problems. Clin Pharm 1984;3:14–5

227. FitzGerald GA. Dipyridamole. N Engl J Med 1987;316: 1247–57

228. Derendorf H, VanderMaelen CP, Brickl RS, MacGregor TR, Eisert W. Dipyridamole bioavailability in subjects with reduced gastric acidity. J Clin Pharmacol 2005;45:845–50

229. Diener HC, Cunha L, Forbes C, Sivenius J, Smets P, Lowenthal A. European Stroke Prevention Study. 2. Dipyridamole and acetylsalicylic acid in the secondary prevention of stroke. J Neurol Sci 1996;143:1–13

230. Mahony C, Wolfram KM, Cocchetto DM, Bjornsson TD. Dipyridamol kinetics. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1982;31:330–8

231. Yokogawa K, Shimomura S, Ishizaki J, Shimada T, Fukuwa C, Kawada M, Tsubokawa T, Yamamoto K, Miyamoto K. Involvement of alpha1-acid glycoprotein in inter-individual variation of disposition kinetics of ropivacaine following epidural infusion in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. J Pharm Pharmacol 2007;59:67–73

232. Holley FO, Ponganis KV, Stanski DR. Effect of cardiopulmonary bypass on the pharmacokinetics of drugs. Clin Pharmacokinet 1982;7:234–51

233. Schaper W. Dipyridamole, an underestimated vascular protective drug. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 2005;19:357–63

234. Serebruany VL, Malinin AI, Hanley DF. Magnitude and time course of platelet inhibition with extended release dipyridamole with or without aspirin in healthy Japanese volunteers: the AGgrenox versus Aspirin Therapy Evaluation (AGATE-Japan). Thromb Haemost 2008;99:116–20

235. Serebruany VL, Malinin AI, Pokov AN, Hanley DF. Antiplatelet profiles of the fixed-dose combination of extended-release dipyridamole and low-dose aspirin compared with clopidogrel with or without aspirin in patients with type 2 diabetes and a history of transient ischemic attack: a randomized, single-blind, 30-day trial. Clin Ther 2008;30: 249–59

236. Weinberger J. Adverse effects and drug interactions of antithrombotic agents used in prevention of ischaemic stroke. Drugs 2005;65:461–71

237. Lette J, Tatum JL, Fraser S, Miller DD, Waters DD, Heller G, Stanton EB, Bom HS, Leppo J, Nattel S. Safety of dipyridamole testing in 73,806 patients: the Multicenter Dipyridamole Safety Study. J Nucl Cardiol 1995;2:3–17

238. Hiatt WR. Medical treatment of peripheral arterial disease and claudication. N Engl J Med 2001;344:1608–21

239. Robless P, Mikhailidis DP, Stansby GP. Cilostazol for peripheral arterial disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;1:CD003748

240. Schleinitz MD, Olkin I, Heidenreich PA. Cilostazol, clopidogrel or ticlopidine to prevent sub-acute stent thrombosis: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Am Heart J 2004;148: 990–7

241. Min PK, Jung JH, Ko YG, Choi D, Jang Y, Shim WH. Effect of cilostazol on in-stent neointimal hyperplasia after coronary artery stenting: a quantitative coronary angiography and volumetric intravascular ultrasound study. Circ J 2007;71:1685–90

242. Jeong YH, Lee SW, Choi BR, Kim IS, Seo MK, Kwak CH, Hwang JY, Park SW. Randomized comparison of adjunctive cilostazol versus high maintenance dose clopidogrel in patients with high post-treatment platelet reactivity: results of the ACCEL-RESISTANCE (Adjunctive Cilostazol Versus High Maintenance Dose Clopidogrel in Patients with Clopidogrel Resistance) randomized study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53:1101–9

243. Lee SW, Park SW, Kim YH, Yun SC, Park DW, Lee CW, Hong MK, Kim HS, Ko JK, Park JH, Lee JH, Choi SW, Seong IW, Cho YH, Lee NH, Kim JH, Chun KJ, Park SJ. Drug-eluting stenting followed by cilostazol treatment reduces late restenosis in patients with diabetes mellitus: the DECLARE-DIABETES Trial (A Randomized Comparison of Triple Antiplatelet Therapy with Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation in Diabetic Patients). J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:1181–7

244. Angiolillo DJ, Capranzano P, Goto S, Aslam M, Desai B, Charlton RK, Suzuki Y, Box LC, Shoemaker SB, Zenni MM, Guzman LA, Bass TA. A randomized study assessing the impact of cilostazol on platelet function profiles in patients with diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease on dual antiplatelet therapy: results of the OPTIMUS-2 study. Eur Heart J 2008;29:2202–11

245. Gotoh F, Tohgi H, Hirai S, Terashi A, Fukuuchi Y, Otomo E, Shinohara Y, Itoh I, Matsuda T, Sawada T, Yamaguchi T, Nishimaru K, Ohashi Y. Cilostazol stroke prevention study: a placebo-controlled double-blind trial for secondary prevention of cerebral infarction. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2000;9:147–57

246. Huang Y, Cheng Y, Wu J, Li Y, Xu E, Hong Z, Li Z, Zhang W, Ding M, Gao X, Fan D, Zeng J, Wong K, Lu C, Xiao J, Yao C. Cilostazol as an alternative to aspirin after ischaemic stroke: a randomised, double-blind, pilot study. Lancet Neurol 2008;7:494–9

247. Onoda K, Ohashi K, Hashimoto A, Okuda M, Shimono T, Nishikawa M, Shimpo H. Inhibition of platelet aggregation by combined therapy with aspirin and cilostazol after off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008;14:230–7

248. Bramer SL, Forbes WP. Relative bioavailability and effects of a high fat meal on single dose cilostazol pharmacokinetics. Clin Pharmacokinet 1999;37:13–23

249. Toyobuku H, Tamai I, Ueno K, Tsuji A. Limited influence of P-glycoprotein on small-intestinal absorption of cilostazol, a high absorptive permeability drug. J Pharm Sci 2003;92: 2249–59

250. Hiratsuka M, Hinai Y, Sasaki T, Konno Y, Imagawa K, Ishikawa M, Mizugaki M. Characterization of human cytochrome p450 enzymes involved in the metabolism of cilostazol. Drug Metab Dispos 2007;35:1730–2

251. Suri A, Forbes WP, Bramer SL. Pharmacokinetics of multiple-dose oral cilostazol in middle-age and elderly men and women. J Clin Pharmacol 1998;38:144–50

252. Schror K. The pharmacology of cilostazol. Diabetes Obes Metab 2002;4:S14–9

253. Mallikaarjun S, Forbes WP, Bramer SL. Effect of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of cilostazol and its metabolites. Clin Pharmacokinet 1999;37:33–40

254. Bramer SL, Forbes WP. Effect of hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of a single dose of cilostazol. Clin Pharmacokinet 1999;37:25–32

255. Ikeda Y, Kikuchi M, Murakami H, Satoh K, Murata M, Watanabe K, Ando Y. Comparison of the inhibitory effects of cilostazol, acetylsalicylic acid and ticlopidine on platelet functions ex vivo: randomized, double-blind cross-over study. Arzneimittelforschung 1987;37:563–6

256. Gamssari F, Mahmood H, Ho JS, Villareal RP, Liu B, Rasekh A, Garcia E, Massumi A. Rapid ventricular tachycardias associated with cilostazol use. Tex Heart Inst J 2002;29:140–2

257. Pratt CM. Analysis of the cilostazol safety database. Am J Cardiol 2001;87:28D–33D

258. Hiatt WR, Money SR, Brass EP. Long-term safety of cilostazol in patients with peripheral artery disease: the CASTLE study (Cilostazol: A Study in Long-term Effects). J Vasc Surg 2008;47:330–6

259. Stone WM, Demaerschalk BM, Fowl RJ, Money SR. Type 3 phosphodiesterase inhibitors may be protective against cerebrovascular events in patients with claudication. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2008;17:129–33

260. Suri A, Bramer SL. Effect of omeprazole on the metabolism of cilostazol. Clin Pharmacokinet 1999;37:53–9

261. Suri A, Forbes WP, Bramer SL. Effects of CYP3A inhibition on the metabolism of cilostazol. Clin Pharmacokinet 1999; 37:61–8

262. Bramer SL, Brisson J, Corey AE, Mallikaarjun S. Effect of multiple cilostazol doses on single dose lovastatin pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers. Clin Pharmacokinet 1999;37: 69–77

263. Harty JA, McKenna P, Moloney D, D'Souza L, Masterson E. Anti-platelet agents and surgical delay in elderly patients with hip fractures. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2007;15:270–2

264. Mollmann H, Nef HM, Hamm CW, Elsasser A. How to manage patients with need for antiplatelet therapy in the setting of (un-)planned surgery. Clin Res Cardiol 2009; 98:8–15

265. Nuttall GA, Brown MJ, Stombaugh JW, Michon PB, Hathaway MF, Lindeen KC, Hanson AC, Schroeder DR, Oliver WC, Holmes DR, Rihal CS. Time and cardiac risk of surgery after bare-metal stent percutaneous coronary intervention. Anesthesiology 2008;109:588–95

266. Bavry AA, Kumbhani DJ, Helton TJ, Borek PP, Mood GR, Bhatt DL. Late thrombosis of drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Am J Med 2006; 119:1056–61

267. Rabbitts JA, Nuttall GA, Brown MJ, Hanson AC, Oliver WC, Holmes DR, Rihal CS. Cardiac risk of noncardiac surgery after percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents. Anesthesiology 2008;109:596–604

268. Park SJ, Park DW, Kim YH, Kang SJ, Lee SW, Lee CW, Han KH, Park SW, Yun SC, Lee SG, Rha SW, Seong IW, Jeong MH, Hur SH, Lee NH, Yoon J, Yang JY, Lee BK, Choi YJ, Chung WS, Lim DS, Cheong SS, Kim KS, Chae JK, Nah DY, Jeon DS, Seung KB, Jang JS, Park HS, Lee K. Duration of dual antiplatelet therapy after implantation of drug-eluting stents. N Engl J Med 2010;362:1374–82

269. Daemen J, Wenaweser P, Tsuchida K, Abrecht L, Vaina S, Morger C, Kukreja N, Jüni P, Sianos G, Hellige G, van Domburg RT, Hess OM, Boersma E, Meier B, Windecker S, Serruys PW. Early and late coronary stent thrombosis of sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents in routine clinical practice: data from a large two-institutional cohort study. Lancet 2007;369:667–78

270. To AC, Armstrong G, Zeng I, Webster MW. Noncardiac surgery and bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2009;2:213–21

271. Pickard AS, Becker RC, Schumock GT, Frye CB. Clopidogrel-associated bleeding and related complications in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Pharmacotherapy 2008;28:376–92

272. Aranki SF, Body SC. Antiplatelet agents used for early intervention in acute coronary syndrome: myocardial salvage versus bleeding complications. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009;138:807–10

273. Banerjee S, Varghese C, Samuel J, Weideman RA, Little BB, Kelly KC, Rao SV, Reilly RF, Brilakis ES. Comparison of the impact of short (<1 year) and long-term (≥1 year) clopidogrel use following percutaneous coronary intervention on mortality. Am J Cardiol 2008;102:1159–62

274. Newsome LT, Kutcher MA, Royster RL. Coronary artery stents. Part I. Evolution of percutaneous coronary intervention. Anesth Analg 2008;107:552–69

275. Llau JV, De Andrés J, Gomar C, Gómez-Luque A, Hidalgo F, Torres LM. Anticlotting drugs and regional anaesthetic and analgesic techniques: comparative update of the safety recommendations. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2007;24:387–98

276. Price MJ. Bedside evaluation of thienopyridine antiplatelet therapy. Circulation 2009;119:2625–32

277. van Werkum JW, Harmsze AM, Elsenberg EH, Bouman HJ, ten Berg JM, Hackeng CM. The use of the VerifyNow system to monitor antiplatelet therapy: a review of the current evidence. Platelets 2008;19:479–88

278. Lordkipanidzé M, Pharand C, Schampaert E, Turgeon J, Palisaitis DA, Diodati JG. A comparison of six major platelet function tests to determine the prevalence of aspirin resistance in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 2007;28:1702–8

279. Lordkipanidzé M, Pharand C, Nguyen TA, Schampaert E, Palisaitis DA, Diodati JG. Comparison of four tests to assess inhibition of platelet function by clopidogrel in stable coronary artery disease patients. Eur Heart J 2008;29:2877–85

280. Hodgson JM, Stone GW, Lincoff AM, Klein L, Walpole H, Bottner R, Weiner BH, Leon MB, Feldman T, Babb J, Dehmer GJ. Late stent thrombosis: considerations and practical advice for the use of drug-eluting stents—a report from the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Drug-Eluting Stent Task Force. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2007;69:327–33

281. Angiolillo DJ, Shoemaker SB, Desai B, Yuan H, Charlton RK, Bernardo E, Zenni MM, Guzman LA, Bass TA, Costa MA. Randomized comparison of a high clopidogrel maintenance dose in patients with diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease: results of the Optimizing Antiplatelet Therapy in Diabetes Mellitus (OPTIMUS) Study. Circulation 2007;115:708–16

282. Douketis JD, Berger PB, Dunn AS, Jaffer AK, Spyropoulos AC, Becker RC, Ansell J. The perioperative management of antithrombotic therapy: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Chest 2008;133:299S–339S

283. Shehata N, Naglie G, Alghamdi AA, Callum J, Mazer CD, Hebert P, Streiner D, Wilson K. Risk factors for red cell transfusion in adults undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review. Vox Sang 2007;93:1–11

284. Hunt I, Blows LJ, Patel SJ. Why clopidogrel failed to inhibit platelet function early after coronary artery bypass surgery: to load or not to load, and is it a question of resistance? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005;129:1197–8

285. Filion KB, Pilote L, Rahme E, Eisenberg MJ. Perioperative use of cardiac medical therapy among patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a systematic review. Am Heart J 2007;154:407–14

286. Metzler H, Prüller F, Münch A, Primus G, Kainz J, Hödl R, Rehak P. Premature preoperative discontinuation of antiplatelet drug therapy in cardiovascular risk patients: a preliminary study on the role of P2Y12 receptor monitoring. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2010;27:138–45

287. Kim JH, Newby LK, Clare RM, Shaw LK, Lodge AJ, Smith PK, Jolicoeur EM, Rao SV, Becker RC, Mark DB, Granger CB. Clopidogrel use and bleeding after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Am Heart J 2008;156:886–92

288. Badreldin A, Kroener A, Kamiya H, Lichtenberg A, Hekmat K. Effect of clopidogrel on perioperative blood loss and transfusion in coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2010;10:48–52

289. Herman CR, Buth KJ, Kent BA, Hirsch GM. Clopidogrel increases blood transfusion and hemorrhagic complications in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2010;89:397–402

290. Tam NL, Pac-Soo C, Pretorius PM. Epidural haematoma after a combined spinal-epidural anaesthetic in a patient treated with clopidogrel and dalteparin. Br J Anaesth 2006;96:262–5

291. Litz RJ, Gottschlich B, Stehr SN. Spinal epidural hematoma after spinal anesthesia in a patient treated with clopidogrel and enoxaparin. Anesthesiology 2004;101:1467–70

292. Fitchett D, Eikelboom J, Fremes S, Mazer D, Singh S, Bittira B, Brister S, Graham JJ, Gupta M, Karkouti K, Lee A, Love M, McArthur R, Peterson M, Verma S, Yau TM. Dual antiplatelet therapy in patients requiring urgent coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: a position statement of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society. Can J Cardiol 2009;25:683–9

293. Napolitano LM, Kurek S, Luchette FA, Corwin HL, Barie PS, Tisherman SA, Hebert PC, Anderson GL, Bard MR, Bromberg W, Chiu WC, Cipolle MD, Clancy KD, Diebel L, Hoff WS, Hughes KM, Munshi I, Nayduch D, Sandhu R, Yelon JA. Clinical practice guideline: red blood cell transfusion in adult trauma and critical care. Crit Care Med 2009;37:3124–57

294. van Straten AH, Bekker MW, Soliman Hamad MA, van Zundert AA, Martens EJ, Schönberger JP, de Wolf AM. Transfusion of red blood cells: the impact on short-term and long-term survival after coronary artery bypass grafting, a ten-year follow-up. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2010;10:37–42

295. Koch C, Li L, Figueroa P, Mihaljevic T, Svensson L, Blackstone EH. Transfusion and pulmonary morbidity after cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2009;88:1410–8

296. Ranucci M, Bozzetti G, Ditta A, Cotza M, Carboni G, Ballotta A. Surgical reexploration after cardiac operations: why a worse outcome? Ann Thorac Surg 2008;86:1557–62

297. Gibbs NM. Point-of-care assessment of antiplatelet agents in the perioperative period: a review. Anaesth Intensive Care 2009;37:354–69

298. Howard-Alpe GM, de Bono J, Hudsmith L, Orr WP, Foex P, Sear JW. Coronary artery stents and non-cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth 2007;98:560–74

299. Cannon CP, McLean DS. Critical pathways using platelet testing to potentially optimize the use of oral antiplatelet therapy. Am J Cardiol 2006;98:33N–8N

300. Rahe-Meyer N, Winterhalter M, Hartmann J, Pattison A, Hecker H, Calatzis A, Solomon C. An evaluation of cyclooxygenase-1 inhibition before coronary artery surgery: aggregometry versus patient self-reporting. Anesth Analg 2008;107:1791–7

301. Velik-Salchner C, Maier S, Innerhofer P, Streif W, Klingler A, Kolbitsch C, Fries D. Point-of-care whole blood impedance aggregometry versus classical light transmission aggregometry for detecting aspirin and clopidogrel: the results of a pilot study. Anesth Analg 2008;107:1798–806

302. Coakley M, Self R, Marchant W, Mackie I, Mallett SV, Mythen M. Use of the platelet function analyser (PFA-100) to quantify the effect of low dose aspirin in patients with ischaemic heart disease. Anaesthesia 2005;60:1173–8

303. McIlroy DR, Myles PS, Phillips LE, Smith JA. Antifibrinolytics in cardiac surgical patients receiving aspirin: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth 2009;102:168–78

304. Henry D, Carless P, Fergusson D, Laupacis A. The safety of aprotinin and lysine-derived antifibrinolytic drugs in cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis. CMAJ 2009;180:183–93

305. Mengistu AM, Röhm KD, Boldt J, Mayer J, Suttner SW, Piper SN. The influence of aprotinin and tranexamic acid on platelet function and postoperative blood loss in cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg 2008;107:391–7

306. Karkouti K, Wijeysundera DN, Yau TM, McCluskey SA, Tait G, Beattie WS. The risk-benefit profile of aprotinin versus tranexamic acid in cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg 2010; 110:21–9

307. Murkin JM, Falter F, Granton J, Young B, Burt C, Chu M. High-dose tranexamic acid is associated with nonischemic clinical seizures in cardiac surgical patients. Anesth Analg 2010;110:350–3

308. Westbrook AJ, Olsen J, Bailey M, Bates J, Scully M, Salamonsen RF. Protocol based on thromboelastograph (TEG) out-performs physician preference using laboratory coagulation tests to guide blood replacement during and after cardiac surgery: a pilot study. Heart Lung Circ 2009;18:277–88

309. Ak K, Isbir CS, Tetik S, Atalan N, Tekeli A, Aljodi M, Civelek A, Arsan S. Thromboelastography-based transfusion algorithm reduces blood product use after elective CABG: a prospective randomized study. J Card Surg 2009;24:404–10

310. Reinhöfer M, Brauer M, Franke U, Barz D, Marx G, Lösche W. The value of rotation thromboelastometry to monitor disturbed perioperative haemostasis and bleeding risk in patients with cardiopulmonary bypass. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 2008;19:212–9

311. Ganter MT, Hofer CK. Coagulation monitoring: current techniques and clinical use of viscoelastic point-of-care coagulation devices. Anesth Analg 2008;106:1366–75

312. Levy JH, Dutton RP, Hemphill JC III, Shander A, Cooper D, Paidas MJ, Kessler CM, Holcomb JB, Lawson JH. Multidisciplinary approach to the challenge of hemostasis. Anesth Analg 2010;110:354–64

313. Karkouti K, Beattie WS, Crowther MA, Callum JL, Chun R, Fremes SE, Lemieux J, McAlister VC, Muirhead BD, Murkin JM, Nathan HJ, Wong BI, Yau TM, Yeo EL, Hall RI. The role of recombinant factor VIIa in on-pump cardiac surgery: proceedings of the Canadian Consensus Conference. Can J Anaesth 2007;54:573–82

314. Gill R, Herbertson M, Vuylsteke A, Olsen PS, von Heymann C, Mythen M, Sellke F, Booth F, Schmidt TA. Safety and efficacy of recombinant activated factor VII: a randomized placebo-controlled trial in the setting of bleeding after cardiac surgery. Circulation 2009;120:21–7

315. Wasowicz M, Meineri M, McCluskey SM, Mitsakakis N, Karkouti K. The utility of thromboelastography for guiding recombinant activated factor VII therapy for refractory hemorrhage after cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2009;23:828–34

316. Riddell JW, Chiche L, Plaud B, Hamon M. Coronary stents and noncardiac surgery. Circulation 2007;116:e378–82

317. Gurbel PA, Tantry US. Aspirin and clopidogrel resistance: consideration and management. J Interv Cardiol 2006;19: 439–48

318. Michos ED, Ardehali R, Blumenthal RS, Lange RA, Ardehali H. Aspirin and clopidogrel resistance. Mayo Clin Proc 2006;81:518–26

Cited By:

This article has been cited 9 time(s).

Blood
Perioperative management of patients on chronic antithrombotic therapy
Ortel, TL
Blood, 120(): 4699-4705.
10.1182/blood-2012-05-423228
CrossRef
Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
ADP-Receptor Inhibitors in the Perioperative Period: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
Oprea, AD; Popescu, WM
Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, 27(4): 779-795.
10.1053/j.jvca.2012.11.014
CrossRef
Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
Progress in Platelet Blockers: The Target is the P2Y(12) Receptor
Patel, PA; Lane, B; Augoustides, JGT
Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, 27(3): 620-624.
10.1053/j.jvca.2013.01.008
CrossRef
Immunology and Allergy Clinics of North America
Mechanisms of Aspirin Desensitization
Burnett, T; Katial, R; Alam, R
Immunology and Allergy Clinics of North America, 33(2): 223-+.
10.1016/j.iac.2012.11.003
CrossRef
American Journal of Roentgenology
Hematoma Formation During Breast Core Needle Biopsy in Women Taking Antithrombotic Therapy
Chetlen, AL; Kasales, C; Mack, J; Schetter, S; Zhu, JJ
American Journal of Roentgenology, 201(1): 215-222.
10.2214/AJR.12.9930
CrossRef
Journal of the Korean Surgical Society
A preliminary study: aspirin discontinuation before elective operations; when is the optimal timing?
Gulpinar, K; Ozdemir, S; Ozis, E; Sahli, Z; Demirtas, S; Korkmaz, A
Journal of the Korean Surgical Society, 85(4): 185-190.
10.4174/jkss.2013.85.4.185
CrossRef
Orthopedics
Bleeding Disorders in Orthopedic Surgery
Mansour, J; Graf, K; Lafferty, P
Orthopedics, 35(): 1053-1062.
10.3928/01477447-20121120-09
CrossRef
Hematology-American Society Hematology Education Program
Perioperative management of patients on chronic antithrombotic therapy
Ortel, TL
Hematology-American Society Hematology Education Program, (): 529-535.
10.1182/asheducation-2012.1.529
CrossRef
Arquivos Brasileiros De Cardiologia
Platelet Antiaggregants in Primary and Secondary Prevention of Atherothrombotic Events
Silva, MVF; Dusse, LMS; Vieira, LM; Carvalho, MD
Arquivos Brasileiros De Cardiologia, 100(6): E78-E84.
10.5935/abc.20130122
CrossRef
Back to Top | Article Outline

© 2011 International Anesthesia Research Society

Login

Become a Society Member