Share this article on:

Successful Removal of a Knotted Fascia Iliaca Catheter: Principles of Patient Positioning for Peripheral Nerve Catheter Extraction

Offerdahl, Matthew R. MD; Lennon, Robert L. DO; Horlocker, Terese T. MD

doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000136475.62117.8F
Technology, Computing, and Simulation: Regional Anesthesia: Case Report

Peripheral nerve catheters are typically advanced a substantial distance into a perineural sheath, theoretically increasing the risk of catheter knotting and kinking. In this case report, we describe successful removal of a knotted fascia iliaca catheter and discuss principles of nonsurgical catheter extraction. A 64-yr-old woman with bilateral coxarthrosis presented for total hip arthroplasty under combined general/regional anesthesia. A 20-gauge fascia iliaca catheter was inserted before surgery by using a loss-of-resistance “double pop” technique. The catheter was uneventfully advanced 10 cm past the needle tip. After injection of 30 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine and 100 μg of clonidine, general anesthesia was induced. An infusion of 0.1% bupivacaine at 20 mL/h was initiated in the recovery room for postoperative analgesia. Approximately 48 h later, resistance was encountered during catheter removal. Catheter extraction was attempted by altering patient positioning, including the supine position during which the catheter placement had occurred. Successful catheter removal was achieved by decreasing tension on the fascia lata and fascia iliaca through flexion of the hip joint and by applying firm, steady traction. The catheter was removed intact with a knot approximately 2 cm from the distal tip. We conclude that the principles for removal of entrapped peripheral catheters are not well known and may differ from those for neuraxial catheters. Patient positioning to minimize pressure and tension on the perineural soft tissues may facilitate catheter removal.

IMPLICATIONS: We describe successful removal of a knotted fascia iliaca catheter. The principles for removal of knotted or broken peripheral catheters are not well known and may differ from those for spinal or epidural catheters. Altering patient positioning to minimize pressure and tension on the soft tissues surrounding the catheter may facilitate catheter removal.

Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota

Accepted for publication June 3, 2004.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Terese T. Horlocker, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. S.W., Rochester, MN 55905. Address e-mail to horlocker.terese@mayo.edu.

Continuous peripheral nerve blocks are effective techniques to provide postoperative analgesia for patients undergoing surgery to the upper and lower extremities (1–3). However, the insertion of an indwelling catheter into a perineural sheath may be complicated by catheter kinking and knotting, resulting in breakage during removal. Although there are several published reports of neuraxial catheter knots, as well as techniques to facilitate removal of these entrapped catheters (4–8), there are few data regarding the management of knotted (9–11) or retained (12,13) peripheral nerve catheters. We present a case of an entrapped fascia iliaca catheter secondary to a true knot. Successful removal was accomplished by shifting the patient’s position to decrease tension on the catheter.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Case Report

A 64-yr-old woman with bilateral coxarthrosis presented for right-sided total hip arthroplasty. Her preoperative medications included a fentanyl (Duragesic®-50) patch. A combined general/regional (continuous fascia iliaca block) anesthetic was planned. The patient was taken to the operating room and placed in the supine position. The inguinal ligament was identified by palpation of the anterior superior iliac spine and the pubic tubercle and was divided into thirds. A mark was made 1 cm inferior to the junction of the middle and lateral thirds, and an 18-gauge, 3.5-in. Hustead needle was introduced and placed behind the fascia iliaca via the “double pop” technique. A standard 20-gauge, nylon, closed-end epidural catheter (Portex, Inc., Keene, NH) was advanced 10 cm past the tip of the needle. An initial bolus of 30 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine with epinephrine 1:200,000 and 100 μg of clonidine was injected, and general anesthesia was induced. An infusion of 0.1% bupivacaine at 20 mL/h was initiated upon the patient’s arrival in the recovery room. It was anticipated that the fascia iliaca infusion would continue for 48 h.

The patient had adequate incisional pain control, complaining chiefly of discomfort in the nonoperative hip in the immediate postoperative period. Approximately 48 h after surgery, catheter removal was attempted with the patient in the supine position. The catheter was at the 12-cm mark at the skin and retracted easily to the 8-cm mark, at which point a significant amount of resistance was encountered. The patient was placed in a partial sitting position with 50° of hip flexion, and gentle traction was applied, but the catheter began to attenuate such that the 1-cm markings were 1.5–2 cm apart. The patient was placed in additional flexion, with an angle of approximately 90° at the catheter insertion site. Application of firm, steady traction resulted in successful catheter removal. The catheter was intact. However, a knot was situated 2 cm from the tip (Fig. 1). There were no neurologic sequelae, and the patient recovered uneventfully. Six weeks later, she underwent hip replacement on the contralateral side with a similar anesthetic technique; the fascia iliaca catheter was removed without difficulty.

Figure 1

Figure 1

Back to Top | Article Outline

Discussion

Fascia iliaca blockade was first described in 1989 by Dalens et al. (14). The technique is a variant of the three-in-one block originally described by Winnie et al. (15) and is often referred to as a “modified femoral three-in-one block” (1). Continuous fascia iliaca and three-in-one blocks provide effective postoperative analgesia after lower extremity operations, including hip and knee arthroplasty (1–3). Complete blockade of the lumbar plexus is more likely if the catheter is advanced 15–20 cm proximally and if the tip is located superior to the sacroiliac joint within the psoas sheath (1,2). However, few catheters (23%–40%) attain the ideal proximal location; most remain coiled in the femoral head region, near the site of insertion. Importantly, ease of catheter advancement is not indicative of final catheter tip location (1,2).

There are few data on the optimal length of insertion of fascia iliaca and other peripheral nerve catheters. The improved success with proximal catheter tip position supports insertion of fascia iliaca catheters to 15–20 cm, but this must be balanced with the propensity for catheter coiling (and, theoretically, kinking and knotting). This is in contrast to epidural catheter placement, for which it has been suggested that the farther an epidural catheter is advanced past the needle tip, the more likely it is to loop, knot, and malfunction (16,17). For example, a catheter length ranging from 1 to 5 cm past the tip of the needle has been proposed for optimal epidural insertion, although there is no consensus (4,16).

Several techniques have been described to facilitate removal of an entrapped epidural catheter. In general, the approach is to minimize bony structure/soft tissue obstruction to reduce the force required to withdraw the catheter, thereby decreasing the likelihood of catheter breakage. Previous clinical investigations have demonstrated that the flexed position is superior for removal of an entrapped epidural catheter and that 2.5 times as much force is required to remove an epidural catheter in the flexed sitting compared with the flexed lateral position (5,7,18,19). The principle of “placing the patient in the position in which the catheter was inserted” when resistance is encountered during catheter removal is in part derived from these cases and investigations. However, it should be considered that the flexed lateral position is not only the position in which neuraxial catheters are placed, but also the position in which bony and soft tissue obstructions are minimized. Other maneuvers include applying firm, steady pressure, pulling the catheter taut (and taping it to the patient’s back or securing it with a tongue depressor to provide gentle traction) and attempting removal hours later, intervening radiologically with passage of a guidewire, and inducing general anesthesia with muscle relaxation (5,18,19). Surgical removal is typically reserved for retrieval of neuraxial catheter fragments that are ferromagnetic, within the intrathecal space, or chronically associated with symptoms of nerve irritation (4,7,20).

Application of these principles may be helpful in the removal of an entrapped peripheral catheter. Peripheral catheters are typically placed with the extremity extended to facilitate identification of superficial landmarks and associated vascular structures. Although facilitating catheter placement, this positioning stretches soft tissue—including sheath, muscle, and fascia—and theoretically increases resistance to catheter extraction. Conversely, catheter removal should be enhanced by release of soft tissue tension/resistance, which may be in a position other than that of catheter placement. For example, during continuous fascia iliaca block, the catheter has traversed the fascia lata and the fascia iliaca. Placing the patient in the supine position conceptually “tightens” these fascial planes and will make removal of a kinked or knotted catheter more difficult. Flexion of the ipsilateral hip conceptually “loosens” these fascial planes and facilitates entrapped catheter removal. In the present case, hip flexion of approximately 90° was needed to allow catheter removal. Placement of the patient in a lateral position may have also theoretically decreased tissue resistance, but this was not necessary or attempted. We have subsequently encountered one additional entrapped (kinked) fascia iliaca catheter, which was successfully removed by flexing the hip to approximately 90° and applying firm, steady traction. As with neuraxial catheters, surgical or fluoroscopically guided retrieval of peripheral nerve catheters may be necessary if symptoms of neural irritation are encountered during attempted removal.

In summary, the optimal distance a fascia iliaca catheter is advanced to achieve successful modified three-in-one blockade is unknown. Although proximal placement of the catheter tip is associated with an increased success rate and improved clinical outcome, the longer the length of catheter threaded beyond the tip of the needle, the higher the likelihood of looping, kinking, and knotting. Furthermore, catheter-related complications will occur occasionally regardless of the catheter length inserted. We present successful removal of a knotted fascia iliaca catheter by placing the patient in hip flexion (which is in opposition to the position of catheter placement). Thus, when entrapped peripheral catheters are encountered, successful removal is based on the same principles as those of entrapped neuraxial catheters, with emphasis on placing the patient in a position that minimizes tension on bony structures and soft tissues. In the case of fascia iliaca catheter entrapment, flexion of the ipsilateral hip joint greatly improves the chances of avoiding operative intervention or retained catheter fragments.

Back to Top | Article Outline

References

1. Ganapathy S, Wasserman RA, Watson JT, et al. Modified continuous femoral three-in-one blockade for postoperative pain after total knee arthroplasty. Anesth Analg 1999;89:1197–202.
2. Capdevila X, Biboulet P, Morau D, et al. Continuous three in one block for postoperative pain after lower limb orthopedic surgery: where do the catheters go? Anesth Analg 2002;94:1001–6.
3. Capdevila X, Bivoulet P, Bouregba M, et al. Comparison of the three-in-one and fascia iliaca compartment blocks in adults: clinical and radiographic analysis. Anesth Analg 1998;86:1039–44.
4. Cousins MJ, Veering BT. Epidural neural blockade. In: Cousins MJ, Bridenbaugh PO, eds. Neural blockade in clinical anesthesia and management of pain. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1998:305.
5. Gozal D, Gozal Y, Beilin B. Removal of knotted epidural catheters. Reg Anesth 1996;21:71–3.
6. Hsin ST, Chang FC, Tsou MY, et al. Inadvertent knotting of a thoracic epidural catheter. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2001;45:255–7.
7. Pierre HL, Block BM, Wu CL. Difficult removal of a wire-reinforced epidural catheter. J Clin Anesth 2003;15:140–1.
8. Ugboma S, Au-Truong X, Kranzler LI, et al. The breaking of an intrathecally-placed epidural catheter during extraction. Anesth Analg 2002;95:1087–9.
9. Hubner T, Gerber H. Knotting of a catheter in the plexus brachialis: a rare complication. Anaesthesist 2003;52:606–7.
10. Motamed C, Bouaziz H, Mercier FJ, Benhamou D. Knotting of a femoral catheter. Reg Anesth 1997;22:486–7.
11. MacLeod D. Knotted peripheral nerve catheter. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2003;28:487–8.
12. Lee B, Goucke R. Shearing of a peripheral nerve catheter. Anesth Analg 2002;95:760–1.
13. Bergman BD, Hebl JR, Kent J, Horlocker TT. Neurologic complications of 405 consecutive continuous axillary catheters. Anesth Analg 2003;96:247–52.
14. Dalens B, Vanneuville G, Tanguy A. Comparison of the fascia iliaca compartment block with the 3-in-1 block in children. Anesth Analg 1989;69:705–13.
15. Winnie AP, Ramamurthy S, Durrani Z. The inguinal paravascular technique of lumbar plexus anesthesia: the 3-in-1 block. Anesth Analg 1973;52:989–96.
16. Beilin Y, Bernstein H, Zucker-Pinchoff B. The optimal distance that a multiorifice epidural catheter should be threaded into the epidural space. Anesth Analg 1995;81:301–4.
17. Muneyuki M, Shirai K, Inamoto A. Roentgenographic analysis of the positions of catheters in the epidural space. Anesthesiology 1970;33:19–24.
18. Jongleux EF, Miller R, Freeman A. An entrapped epidural catheter in a postpartum patient. Reg Anesth Pain Med 1998;23:615–7.
19. Boey SK, Carrie LES. Withdrawal forces during removal of lumbar extradural catheters. Br J Anaesth 1994;73:833–5.
20. Bromage PR. Complications and contraindications. In: Bromage PR, ed. Epidural analgesia. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1978:665–6.
© 2004 International Anesthesia Research Society