Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Share this article on:

Testing Anal Sphincter Tone Predicts the Effectiveness of Caudal Analgesia in Children

Verghese, Susan T. MD; Mostello, Lucille A. MD; Patel, Ramesh I. MD; Kaplan, Richard F. MD; Patel, Kantilal M. PhD

doi: 10.1097/00000539-200205000-00019
PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA: Special Article

In this study, we examined the effectiveness of caudal blocks and correlated it with the laxity of the patients’ anal sphincter before emergence from anesthesia in 178 children undergoing inguinal and/or penile surgery. Bupivacaine 0.25% in a volume of 0.6–1.25 mL/kg was used in all patients. The presence of a lax anal sphincter at the end of surgery correlated significantly with the reduced administration of narcotics intraoperatively and in the postanesthesia care unit (P < 0.001). The sensitivity of the sphincter tone test was 98.1% with a 95% confidence interval (CI) ranging from 94.3% to 99.6%. The specificity of the test was 94.4% with a 95% CI of 72.0%–100%. The positive predictive value of this test in predicting adequate caudal block was excellent (99.4%) with a 95% CI of 96.1%–100%. The negative predictive value was better than average (85%) with a 95% CI of 62.9%–95.4%. We conclude that a lax anal sphincter can predict the effectiveness of analgesia after pediatric caudal blockade. A tight sphincter may suggest the need to repeat the block before the child awakens, or consider alternate methods of postoperative analgesia.

Departments of Anesthesiology and Pediatrics, Children’s National Medical Center and George Washington University, Washington, DC

Presented in part at the annual meetings of the International Anesthesia Research Society, Honolulu, HI, March 11, 2000.

December 28, 2001.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Susan T. Verghese, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Children’s National Medical Center, 111 Michigan Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20010. Address e-mail to sverghes@cnmc.org.

© 2002 International Anesthesia Research Society
You currently do not have access to this article

To access this article:

Note: If your society membership provides full-access, you may need to login on your society website