Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Share this article on:

Identifying Lynch Syndrome in Patients With Endometrial Carcinoma: Shortcomings of Morphologic and Clinical Schemas

Clarke, Blaise A. MBBCh, FRCPC; Cooper, Kumarasen MD, MBChB, DPhil, FRC Path

Advances in Anatomic Pathology: July 2012 - Volume 19 - Issue 4 - p 231–238
doi: 10.1097/PAP.0b013e31825c6b76
Review Articles

It has been suggested that reflex testing for Lynch syndrome (LS) using mismatch repair immunohistochemistry and/or microsatellite instability analysis in newly diagnosed colorectal carcinoma (CRC) patients is an emerging standard of care in the United States. The risk of gynecologic malignancy in women with LS approaches and even exceeds that of CRC. Furthermore, gynecologic malignancies are often the sentinel cancers in these patients. There is significant variation in practice, but some groups have similarly recommended deployment of reflex testing strategies in patients presenting with endometrial cancer (EC). The College of American Pathologists has stated that pathologists should recognize the histologic and clinical features that should prompt at least a recommendation for mismatch repair testing. Morphologic and clinical schemas in EC to identify microsatellite unstable/LS tumors are less refined than the colon-centric schemas (Amsterdam, Bethesda, and MsPath). Studies of LS EC are few and interpretation is limited by recruitment strategies and the myriad of definitions and study designs used. Although serous cell type is used to triage ovarian cancer patients for BRCA screening, cell type correlation in LS is less certain but seems to involve a spectrum of cell types. We review the morphologic and clinical features/schemas in LS EC and highlight limitations of restrictive aged-based screening strategies, uncertainty in current clinical schemas and equivocal results of morphologic studies of LS EC. With uncertainty of histologic and clinical schemas, and following developments in CRC, reflex testing of all/vast majority of newly diagnosed EC for LS should be considered.

*Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Toronto

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada

Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT

B.A.C. and K.C. contributed equally.

The authors have no funding or conflicts of interest to disclose.

Reprints: Blaise A. Clarke, MBBCh, FRCPC, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2C4 (e-mail: blaise.clarke@uhn.on.ca).

Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.