Home Current Issue Previous Issues Published Ahead-of-Print Collections For Authors Journal Info
Skip Navigation LinksHome > January 2011 - Volume 341 - Issue 1 > Relative Resistance to Oral Theophylline Treatment in Patien...
American Journal of the Medical Sciences:
doi: 10.1097/MAJ.0b013e3181f1fdc8
Clinical Investigation

Relative Resistance to Oral Theophylline Treatment in Patients With Hyposmia Manifested by Decreased Secretion of Nasal Mucus Cyclic Nucleotides

Henkin, Robert I. MD; Velicu, Irina MS; Schmidt, Loren BS

Collapse Box

Abstract

Introduction: Oral treatment with the phosphodiesterase inhibitor theophylline in an open-label fixed-design clinical trial in 312 patients with hyposmia improved smell function in >50%. Before treatment, all patients had lower than normal levels of nasal mucus cAMP and cGMP. The purpose of this study was to study relationships among changes in smell function, theophylline levels and nasal mucus cAMP and cGMP among patients whose smell function improved (responders) and those who did not improve (nonresponders) on oral theophylline treatment.

Methods: After all data analysis from the clinical trial was completed, data from each of the 31 of the 312 patients in whom nasal mucus cAMP and cGMP and theophylline levels were available before and after theophylline treatment at several drug doses were evaluated. At initiation and at termination of each treatment, dose smell function, nasal mucus cAMP and cGMP and plasma theophylline were analyzed.

Results: On the same theophylline dose, although serum theophylline increased among both responders and nonresponders, serum levels were consistently higher among responders. Nasal mucus cAMP and cGMP were also higher among responders than nonresponders. At higher theophylline doses, cGMP reached normal levels among responders, whereas it did not change significantly among nonresponders.

Conclusions: Some patients with hyposmia with initially low nasal mucus cAMP and cGMP levels may be relatively resistant to oral theophylline treatment. This result may offer a mechanism of response lack among some patients whose smell function did not improve after oral theophylline treatment although other factors may influence their response lack.

© Copyright 2011 Southern Society for Clinical Investigation

Login

Article Tools

Share

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.