Skip Navigation LinksHome > June 2010 - Volume 31 - Issue 2 > Are Youth-Only Motorcycle Helmet Laws Better Than None at Al...
American Journal of Forensic Medicine & Pathology:
doi: 10.1097/PAF.0b013e3181c6beab
Original Article

Are Youth-Only Motorcycle Helmet Laws Better Than None at All?

Brooks, Erin MD*; Naud, Shelly PhD†; Shapiro, Steven MD‡

Collapse Box


Introduction: The trend in state motorcycle helmet laws has been a reduction from universal coverage requiring all riders to wear helmets, to partial coverage requiring only younger riders to wear helmets. In the current study we evaluate whether partial helmet laws reduce motorcycle fatalities and increase helmet compliance among young riders.

Materials and Methods: We compared a decade of motorcycle fatalities from the only 3 states with no helmet laws (New Hampshire, Iowa, Illinois) to 3 states with ≤17-year-old partial helmet laws (Connecticut, Indiana, Wisconsin). We excluded highway speeds, blood alcohol laws, and minimum legal drinking age as being significant variables.

Results: Overall, there was no significant difference in the average fatality rate per 10,000 motorcycle registrations for ≤17-year-old riders in partial helmet law states versus no helmet law states (P = 0.45). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the helmet wearing rate of ≤17-year-old fatalities in partial helmet law versus no helmet law states (P = 0.79).

Conclusions: Partial helmet laws neither significantly reduce fatality rates nor increase helmet compliance rates among young riders. A partial helmet law is roughly equivalent to none at all; only universal helmet laws have been shown to effectively protect young motorcyclists.

© 2010 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.


Article Tools


Article Level Metrics

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.