Skip Navigation LinksHome > September 1998 - Volume 19 - Issue 3 > Reexamination of Custody Restraint Position and Positional A...
Text sizing:
American Journal of Forensic Medicine & Pathology:

Reexamination of Custody Restraint Position and Positional Asphyxia

Chan, Theodore C. M.D.; Vilke, Gary M. M.D.; Neuman, Tom M.D.

Collapse Box


The use of the hogtie restraint (also known as hobble or prone maximal restraint) by law enforcement and prehospital personnel has come under scrutiny because of reports of sudden deaths in persons placed in this restraint position. Some contend that this body position restricts chest and abdominal movement to the point that individuals are at risk for hypoventilatory respiratory compromise and "positional" asphyxiation. We review case reports of custody deaths in subjects placed in the hogtie position, as well as related medical literature regarding positional asphyxia. We also review the current research findings from human physiology studies that have investigated the effects of the hogtie position on respiratory and pulmonary function. We conclude that the hogtie restraint position by itself does not cause respiratory compromise to the point of asphyxiation and that other factors are responsible for the sudden deaths of individuals placed in this position.

© 1998 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.


Article Tools


Article Level Metrics

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.