Share this article on:

Extraskeletal Osteosarcoma: An International Rare Cancer Network Study

Sio, Terence T. MD, MS*; Vu, Charles C. BSE*; Sohawon, Schoeb MD, MSc; Van Houtte, Paul MD, PhD; Thariat, Juliette MD, PhD; Novotny, Paul J. MS§; Miller, Robert C. MD, MS*; Bar-Sela, Gil MD

American Journal of Clinical Oncology: February 2016 - Volume 39 - Issue 1 - p 32–36
doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000005
Original Articles: Soft Tissue

Objectives: To report characteristics, treatment, and outcomes for an international cohort of patients with extraskeletal osteosarcoma (ESOS).

Materials and Methods: Through the Rare Cancer Network, retrospective data on patients with ESOS were collected. Patient characteristics, multimodality treatment information, and survival status were analyzed.

Results: Thirty-seven patients in 4 health care institutions were identified. Thirty-one (86%) patients had grade 3 or 4 tumors. Most patients (27 [73%]) had stage III disease. Fourteen (38%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation. Of 28 (85%) who underwent surgery, 21 (75%) had free margins achieved and 15 (41%) subsequently received adjuvant chemotherapy. At median follow-up of 45 months, 20 (55%) patients were alive, 13 (43%) of whom were disease free. Univariate analysis showed that poor overall survival was related to stage IV (P<0.001), no surgery (P<0.001), primary size >10 cm (P=0.002), and age (P=0.002). In multivariate analysis, primary size >10 cm (P=0.005) was prognostic for overall survival. For patients without metastases, univariate analysis showed disease-free survival (DFS) related to primary size >10 cm (P=0.003), surgery (P=0.004), local recurrence (P=0.003), and age (P<0.001). In multivariate analysis for DFS, primary size >10 cm (P=0.01) and older age (P<0.001) were significant for worse outcome.

Conclusions: Multimodality treatment remains standard for localized ESOS, with indications for neoadjuvant therapy less clear. Larger tumor size and older age were prognostic of poorer DFS.

*Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic

§Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

Department of Radiation Oncology, Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium

Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France

Department of Oncology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Reprints: Terence T. Sio, MD, MS, Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905. E-mail: sio.terence@mayo.edu.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.