To compare reimbursement and cost efficacy between accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) techniques.
Four hundred fifty-three patients were treated with APBI using either 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT, n=207) or balloon-based brachytherapy (BB) [single-lumen (SL, n=161) and multilumen (ML, n=85)] between March 2000 and October 2011. To evaluate cost-effectiveness, reimbursement by treatment technique was calculated based on 2011 Medicare schedules. Facility costs were generated by technique based on ICD-9 codes. Incremental cost effectiveness ratios (ICER), which compares cost with clinical outcomes, were calculated according to the difference in reimbursement to the criteria being evaluated.
With a median follow-up of 3.6 years, the 5-year rate of local recurrence was 1.9% for all patients (3D-CRT, 0%; BB, 4.1%; P=0.23). When pooled, BB patients had a significant improvement in excellent/good cosmesis (91.6% vs. 80.0%; P=0.03). Rates of combined grade 2 or higher dermatitis, hyper/hypopigmentation, pain, or fibrosis per technique were 62%, 28%, and 34% for 3D-CRT, SL, and ML patients, respectively (P=0.26). The ICER per percent improved cosmesis for SL/ML was $519/$850 based on reimbursement and $301/$643 based on cost compared with 3D-CRT.
On the basis of ICER, brachytherapy for APBI is a cost-effective option with regard to cosmesis and toxicity. This economic analysis suggests the increased cost of applicator-based brachytherapy may be justified in appropriately selected patients.
*Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri
†Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Cancer Institute, William Beaumont School of Medicine, Oakland University, Royal Oak, MI
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Reprints: Thomas Lanni, MBA, Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Cancer Institute, William Beaumont School of Medicine, Oakland University, 3601 West 13 Mile Road, Royal Oak, MI 48073. E-mail: email@example.com.