Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Share this article on:

Comparison of Preoperative Embolization Followed by Radical Nephrectomy with Radical Nephrectomy Alone for Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Zielinski, Henryk M.D., Ph.D.; Szmigielski, Stanislaw M.D., Ph.D.; Petrovich, Zbigniew M.D.

American Journal of Clinical Oncology: February 2000 - Volume 23 - Issue 1 - pp 6-12
Original Article

A series of 474 patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC), who had radical nephrectomy during a period of 15 years, was studied to assess the prognostic significance of various pathologic parameters (tumor stage [pT], lymph node status, metastasis, tumor grade, venous involvement) and value of preoperative embolization of renal artery. There were: 20 (4%) pT1, 204 (43%) pT2, 245 (52%) pT3, and 5 (1%) pT4 patients. All 474 patients underwent nephrectomy including a group of 118 (25%) patients (24 pT2, 90 pT3, and 4 pT4) who underwent preoperative embolization of the renal artery. To compare treatment outcomes in embolized patients with RCC, a group of 116 (24%) nonembolized patients with RCC was selected. This group was matched for sex, age, stage, tumor size, and tumor grade, with the embolized patients (p < 0.01). All important prognostic factors were studied as to their influence on survival by the treatment group. The overall 5- and 10-year survival was 62% and 47%, respectively. The 5- and 10-year survival rates were significantly better (p < 0.01) for patients with pT2 than for those with pT3 tumors (79% vs. 50% and 59% vs. 35%, respectively). Involvement of regional lymph nodes (N+) was an important prognostic factor for survival in patients with pT3 tumors. The 5-year survival for pT3 N+ was 39%, compared with 66% in those with pT3N0 (p < 0.01). Preoperative embolization was also an important factor influencing survival. The overall 5- and 10-year survival for 118 patients embolized before nephrectomy was 62% and 47%, respectively, and it was 35% and 23%, respectively, for the matched group of 116 patients treated with surgery alone (p = 0.01). The most important finding of this study was an apparent importance of preoperative embolization in improving patients' survival. This finding needs to be interpreted with caution and confirmed in a prospective randomized trial.

From the Departments of Clinical Urology, MMA Central Clinical Hospital (H.Z.), Warsaw, and Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology (S.S.), Warsaw, Poland; and Radiation Oncology and Urology, (Z.P.) University of Southern California School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A.

This work was supported by Research Grant P05/97 from the National Committee of Scientific Research (KBN) in Poland.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Zbigniew Petrovich, Department of Radiation Oncology, USC School of Medicine, 1441 Eastlake Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90033, U.S.A.

© 2000 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.