Skip Navigation LinksHome > September/October 2013 - Volume 20 - Issue 5 > Does Seating Location Impact Voting Behavior on Food and Dru...
American Journal of Therapeutics:
doi: 10.1097/MJT.0b013e31821109d5
Original Article

Does Seating Location Impact Voting Behavior on Food and Drug Administration Advisory Committees?

Broniatowski, David A. PhD*; Magee, Christopher L. PhD

Collapse Box

Abstract

Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advisory committees have a significant influence on patterns of clinical practice worldwide. Recent guidance to the committees by the FDA has focused on attempting to eliminate sources of bias due to committee voting procedures. Nevertheless, major sources of social influence have not been addressed. We analyzed transcripts of Circulatory Systems Devices Panel meetings from 1997 to 2005 in which the panel cast votes on premarket approval and for which a voting minority existed. Committee members who are assigned to speak later are significantly more likely to be in the voting minority (P < 0.001). This effect holds for meetings with sequential voting (P = 0.0058) and for meetings with simultaneous voting (P = 0.045). A weaker effect shows that, for meetings with sequential voting, committee members who vote later are significantly more likely to be in the voting minority (P = 0.018). Speaking order and voting order are both determined by seating location. We therefore conclude that voting behavior on FDA expert advisory committees is strongly associated with seating location. This suggests the presence of a possible social dynamic that is not addressed by existing FDA committee procedures.

Copyright © 2011 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Login

Article Tools

Share

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.