Skip Navigation LinksHome > June 2013 - Volume 92 - Issue 6 > Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Efficacy in Acute Strok...
American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation:
doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31828762ec
Original Research Articles

Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Efficacy in Acute Stroke Feeding Tube–Dependent Dysphagia During Inpatient Rehabilitation

Kushner, David S. MD; Peters, Kenneth MS, CCC-SLP; Eroglu, Stacy Thomashaw MA, CCC-SLP; Perless-Carroll, Melissa MS, CCC-SLP; Johnson-Greene, Douglas PhD

Collapse Box

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) in addition to traditional dysphagia therapy (TDT) including progressive resistance training (PRT) with that of TDT/PRT alone during inpatient rehabilitation for treatment of feeding tube–dependent dysphagia in patients who have had an acute stroke.

Design

This study is an inpatient rehabilitation case-control study involving 92 patients who have had an acute stroke with initial Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) scores of 3 or lower and profound to severe feeding tube–dependent dysphagia. Sixty-five patients, the NMES group, received NMES with TDT/PRT, and 27 patients, the case-control group, received only TDT/PRT. Treatment occurred in hourly sessions daily for a mean ± SD of 18 ± 3 days. χ2 Analyses/t tests revealed no significant statistical differences between the groups for age (t = −0.85; P = 0.40), sex (χ2 = 0.05; P = 0.94), and stroke location (χ2 = 4.2; P = 0.24). A Mann-Whitney U test revealed a statistically significant difference between the groups for the initial FOIS score (z = −2.4; P = 0.015), with the NMES group having worse initial scores with a mean rank of 42.64 and the case-control TDT/PRT group having a mean rank of 55.8. The main outcome measure was the comparison of the FOIS scores after treatment.

Results

The mean ± SD FOIS score after NMES with TDT/PRT treatment was 5.1 ± 1.8 compared with 3.3 ± 2.2 in the case-control TDT/PRT group. The mean gain for the NMES group was 4.4 points; and for the case-control group, 2.4 points. Significant improvement in swallowing performance was found for the NMES group compared with the TDT/PRT group (z = 3.64; P < 0.001). Within the NMES group, 46% (30 of 65) of the patients had minimal or no swallowing restrictions (FOIS score of 5–7) after treatment, whereas 26% (7 of 27) of those in the case-control group improved to FOIS scores of 5–7, a statistically significant difference (χ2 = 6.0; P = 0.01).

Conclusions

This study suggests that NMES with TDT/PRT is significantly more effective than TDT/PRT alone during inpatient rehabilitation in reducing feeding tube–dependent dysphagia in patients who have had an acute stroke.

Copyright © 2013 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Login

Article Tools

Share

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.