Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Share this article on:

Shoulder Impingement Syndrome: Relationships Between Clinical, Functional, and Radiologic Findings

Ardic, Figen MD; Kahraman, Yasar MD; Kacar, Mahmut MD; Kahraman, Mehmet Cemal MD; Findikoglu, Gulin MD; Yorgancioglu, Z Rezan MD

American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation: January 2006 - Volume 85 - Issue 1 - pp 53-60
Research Article: Imaging

Ardic F, Kahraman Y, Kacar M, Kahraman MC, Findikoglu G, Yorgancioglu ZR: Shoulder impingement syndrome: Relationships between clinical, functional, and radiologic findings. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2006;85:53–60.

Objective: Although there has been much research about imaging methods for shoulder impingement syndrome, the clinical information and upper limb level of disability have been generally ignored. The purpose of this study was to detect the relationships between clinical, functional, and radiologic variables in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome.

Design: A cross-sectional, clinical, and radiologic study was planned and 59 shoulders of 58 consecutive patients waiting for physical therapy because of a clinically suspected shoulder impingement syndrome were included into this study. Comprehensive clinical examination, radiography, shoulder ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging were performed in the same month.

Results: Despite the high sensitivities of ultrasonography for diagnosing rotator cuff tears (98.1%) and biceps pathologies (100%), magnetic resonance imaging was superior to ultrasonography in many important shoulder structures such as a glenoid labral tear and subacromial bursal effusion/hypertrophy (P < 0.01). These structures were the determinants of the shoulder’s disability measured by disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire.

Conclusion: Ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging had comparable high accuracy for identifying the biceps pathologies and rotator cuff tears. The basic clinical tests had modest accuracy in both disorders. The choice of which imaging test to perform should be based on the patient’s clinical information (regarding lesion of glenoid labrum, joint capsule, muscle, and bone), cost, and imaging experience of the radiology department.

From the Division of Hand Rehabilitation, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation I (FA, YK, GF, ZRY), and the Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging, Department of Radiology I (MK), Ankara Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey; and the ANSA Center of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Ankara, Turkey (MCK).

All correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to Figen Ardic, MD, Ahmet Hamdi s. 20/12, Ankara 06170, Turkey.

© 2006 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.