Skip Navigation LinksHome > January 2006 - Volume 85 - Issue 1 > Shoulder Impingement Syndrome: Relationships Between Clinica...
American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation:
Research Article: Imaging

Shoulder Impingement Syndrome: Relationships Between Clinical, Functional, and Radiologic Findings

Ardic, Figen MD; Kahraman, Yasar MD; Kacar, Mahmut MD; Kahraman, Mehmet Cemal MD; Findikoglu, Gulin MD; Yorgancioglu, Z Rezan MD

Collapse Box


Ardic F, Kahraman Y, Kacar M, Kahraman MC, Findikoglu G, Yorgancioglu ZR: Shoulder impingement syndrome: Relationships between clinical, functional, and radiologic findings. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2006;85:53–60.

Objective: Although there has been much research about imaging methods for shoulder impingement syndrome, the clinical information and upper limb level of disability have been generally ignored. The purpose of this study was to detect the relationships between clinical, functional, and radiologic variables in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome.

Design: A cross-sectional, clinical, and radiologic study was planned and 59 shoulders of 58 consecutive patients waiting for physical therapy because of a clinically suspected shoulder impingement syndrome were included into this study. Comprehensive clinical examination, radiography, shoulder ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging were performed in the same month.

Results: Despite the high sensitivities of ultrasonography for diagnosing rotator cuff tears (98.1%) and biceps pathologies (100%), magnetic resonance imaging was superior to ultrasonography in many important shoulder structures such as a glenoid labral tear and subacromial bursal effusion/hypertrophy (P < 0.01). These structures were the determinants of the shoulder’s disability measured by disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire.

Conclusion: Ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging had comparable high accuracy for identifying the biceps pathologies and rotator cuff tears. The basic clinical tests had modest accuracy in both disorders. The choice of which imaging test to perform should be based on the patient’s clinical information (regarding lesion of glenoid labrum, joint capsule, muscle, and bone), cost, and imaging experience of the radiology department.

© 2006 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.


Article Tools


Article Level Metrics

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.