Share this article on:

CE: Preeclampsia Current Approaches to Nursing Management

Anderson, Cindy M. PhD, CRNP, ANEF, FAHA, FAAN; Schmella, Mandy J. PhD, RN

AJN The American Journal of Nursing: November 2017 - Volume 117 - Issue 11 - p 30–38
doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000526722.26893.b5
Feature Articles
Podcasts

Preeclampsia, one of four hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, has traditionally been characterized as new-onset hypertension and proteinuria developing after 20 weeks’ gestation. It is, however, now understood to be a complex, progressive, multisystem disorder with a highly variable presentation and a number of potentially life-threatening complications. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy has refined preeclampsia diagnostic criteria accordingly, and as the disorder's pathogenesis has been more clearly defined, new targets for screening, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment have emerged. This clinical update provides a review of current practice related to preeclampsia risk assessment, prediction, and management. It discusses preeclampsia pathophysiology and points readers to valuable health care resources on the topic.

A clinical review of current practice related to preeclampsia risk assessment, prediction, and management, plus updated diagnostic criteria from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy.

Cindy M. Anderson is an associate professor and an associate dean for academic affairs and educational innovation at the Ohio State University College of Nursing, Columbus, and a member of the medical advisory board of the Preeclampsia Foundation. Mandy J. Schmella is an assistant professor at the University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, Pittsburgh, PA. Both authors contributed equally to the development of this article. Contact author: Cindy M. Anderson, anderson.2765@osu.edu. The authors and planners have disclosed no potential conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

KW was a healthy 35-year-old woman whose life was forever changed when she developed severe and life-threatening complications during the latter half of her second pregnancy. (This case is real, based largely on the patient's description of her experience of the events. Identifying details have been omitted to protect the patient's privacy.) KW's one previous pregnancy had ended with a first-trimester miscarriage. Her second pregnancy had been unremarkable until 31 weeks’ gestation. Throughout this pregnancy, she had received routine prenatal care from her obstetrician as well as intermittent follow-up from a maternal–fetal medicine specialist because of her advanced maternal age.

For the first 30 weeks, KW's pregnancy progressed smoothly. She attended all of her prenatal checkups, maintained a healthy diet and an active lifestyle, and did everything she could to ensure a healthy pregnancy. But at 31 weeks, KW began to show signs and symptoms of preeclampsia.

First, she developed excruciating pain in her upper right side. A trip to the perinatal triage unit revealed that her blood pressure was on the high end of normal, she had protein in her urine, and her platelet count was at the low end of normal. With analgesia, the pain in her right side resolved, and after eight hours of close observation, she was sent home. The focus of KW's care plan became “expectant management,” with preparation for delivery at no more than 37 weeks’ gestation and intensive maternal and fetal monitoring, the frequency of which was based on findings of maternal and neonatal surveillance. Over the next several weeks, KW's monitoring included

  • home blood pressure monitoring.
  • weekly fetal nonstress tests.
  • weekly visits with the maternal–fetal medicine specialist and the obstetrician.
  • 24-hour protein measurements.
  • weekly blood samples to measure complete blood count, as well as levels of liver enzymes and serum creatinine.
  • ultrasound, performed weekly for measurement of amniotic fluid index and every three weeks for fetal growth assessment.

At 35 weeks and three days’ gestation, KW developed a persistent headache. Although she knew this was a warning sign of preeclampsia, she believes she was in denial. She wanted to hold onto her pregnancy as long as possible and thought she could put off telling the maternal–fetal medicine specialist until her appointment two days later. Her headache continued, and at her appointment, her blood pressure was 160/110 mmHg. Her physician told her that her pregnancy was over, and she agreed to be admitted for induction.

Because KW's platelet count was extremely low (33,000 per microliter, as she recalls), the physicians were concerned about her bleeding risk. For this reason, they opted to induce labor rather than to proceed immediately to epidural placement and cesarean section. Over a 26-hour labor, however, KW's condition further deteriorated. Although she was receiving a continuous iv infusion of magnesium sulfate for seizure prophylaxis, after 24 hours of labor her vision became gradually blurry, she started seeing spots, and eventually, she saw nothing but “a white blur.” Soon after her loss of vision, she had a seizure, indicating that her condition had advanced to eclampsia (pregnancy-related seizures). This life-threatening deterioration led to an emergency cesarean delivery, multiple platelet transfusions, an ICU stay, and—owing to his prematurity—a neonatal ICU stay for her newborn son for monitoring of lung function and bilirubin levels.

While KW was recovering from her cesarean section, her vision returned. Remarkably, just 36 hours after giving birth to a healthy baby boy, KW was able to walk to the neonatal ICU to see and breastfeed her son for the first time. A little less than a week after delivery, KW and her son were discharged from the hospital. KW recovered from the acute symptoms of preeclampsia. Following delivery, however, she developed chronic hypertension requiring antihypertensive therapy, and one year after the birth of her son, she experienced a second seizure. Although she was diagnosed with a mild seizure disorder, she has been seizure free for two years. She understands that a history of preeclampsia puts her at elevated risk for cardiovascular disease, necessitating annual cardiovascular screening.

Box.

Box.

KW's case is presented here to set the stage for a clinical update on preeclampsia–eclampsia, one of four hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (see The Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy1). KW had developed a severe form of preeclampsia, which was complicated by the syndrome known as HELLP (in which the patient exhibits hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and a low platelet count) and eventually progressed to eclampsia. This article provides nurses with current information related to diagnosis, pathophysiology, risk factors, prediction, prevention, and management of preeclampsia. It further suggests preeclampsia resources for use by nurses, pregnant women, and preeclampsia survivors.

Back to Top | Article Outline

PREECLAMPSIA REDEFINED

Table 1

Table 1

Although preeclampsia has traditionally been defined by the presence of new-onset hypertension and proteinuria after 20 weeks’ gestation, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy emphasizes that it is a complex, progressive, multisystem disorder of pregnancy that can present in different forms, with some women experiencing unremitting headaches or severe right upper quadrant pain and others experiencing no symptoms before prenatal visits reveal they have elevated blood pressure and protein in their urine. The ACOG Task Force has refined the diagnostic criteria accordingly (see Table 11). Based on evidence that proteinuria is neither a robust predictor nor the sole predictor of adverse outcomes, it was removed both as an indicator of severe preeclampsia and as a necessary criterion for preeclampsia diagnosis.1-3 Women with either proteinuric or nonproteinuric preeclampsia are at risk for adverse outcomes and require increased maternal and fetal surveillance.4, 5 In 2000, the National High Blood Pressure Education Program of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute had removed edema from the diagnostic criteria because it is common in women with normal pregnancies; in addition, it removed systolic blood pressure increases of 30 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure increases of 15 mmHg in women with blood pressure below 140/90 mmHg, because such women are not more likely to have adverse outcomes.6

Recommended terminology. The ACOG Task Force has also recommended changes in the terminology used to describe the severity of preeclampsia. They suggest that the term “preeclampsia without severe features” be used instead of “mild preeclampsia.”1 In addition to the multisystem findings listed in Table 1, either of the following would be considered a severe feature of preeclampsia1:

  • systolic blood pressure at or above 160 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure at or above 110 mmHg on two occasions at least four hours apart in a patient on bedrest, unless antihypertensive therapy had been initiated previously
  • severe and persistent right upper quadrant or epigastric pain that does not resolve with medication and is not explained by alternative diagnoses
Back to Top | Article Outline

FREQUENCY, MORBIDITY, AND MORTALITY

In the United States, preeclampsia complicates 2.3% to 3.8% of pregnancies.7, 8 Globally, it's estimated to affect 4.6% of pregnancies,7 though frequency varies by region, being reportedly as low 0.2% in Vietnam and as high as 7.67% in Nicaragua.9

Despite the relatively low percentage of pregnancies affected by preeclampsia, it remains a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. Hypertensive disorders are responsible for roughly 14% of pregnancy-related maternal deaths worldwide10 and about 7.4% of such deaths in the United States11—and preeclampsia is the most common hypertensive disorder of pregnancy.1 Preeclampsia can affect virtually every organ system, putting the mother at risk for a host of morbidities, including disseminated intravascular coagulation and respiratory, cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, liver, kidney, uterine, and neurologic dysfunction.9, 12-14

For infants exposed to preeclampsia in utero, preeclampsia-related morbidity is associated primarily with prematurity, though these infants tend to have an unfavorable cardiometabolic profile (that is, elevated blood pressure, a high body mass index [BMI], or signs of altered cardiac function and structure) in adolescence or adulthood.15-18 Despite the significant health burden that preeclampsia places on women and their infants, no test can reliably predict preeclampsia and no known practices can prevent its occurrence. Clinical management of preeclampsia is, therefore, symptom based, and the only known cure for preeclampsia is delivery.

Back to Top | Article Outline

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF PREECLAMPSIA

Depending on time of onset during gestation, preeclampsia may represent more than a single condition or include disease subtypes with different causes and clinical presentations. Current evidence suggests that the pathogenesis of preeclampsia proceeds in stages.19 The early stages occur during pregnancy weeks 8 through 18 and involve altered placental development that reduces blood flow between the maternal and fetal circulations; no clinical signs or symptoms are associated with these early stages. Signs and symptoms of preeclampsia do not appear until the second half of pregnancy, though they are secondary to the impaired maternal perfusion of the placenta that occurs in the early weeks of pregnancy.19

Role of placenta in maternalfetal circulation. The placenta provides the primary source of sustenance to the growing fetus throughout pregnancy, delivering necessary nutrients and oxygen while removing waste. Two factors are critical in this exchange process: delivery of maternal circulation to the placenta and adequate placental surface area for an exchange of substances between the maternal and fetal circulations. The maternal circulation delivers essential substances for fetal sustenance through the spiral arteries to the placenta. Maternal blood bathes the chorionic villi that house the fetal vessels, transferring substances across the villi into the fetal veins, where they are circulated throughout the fetal system. Fetal waste is returned to the fetal arteries, housed in the chorionic villi, transferred to the maternal blood bathing the villi in the placenta, and removed by the maternal circulation through the spiral veins.

To meet the needs of the fetus as it grows, the maternal uterine spiral arteries must undergo a transformation that allows them to perfuse the placenta effectively throughout gestation. Normally, transformation of the maternal spiral arteries is established during placental development in the early weeks of pregnancy.19 In preeclampsia, however, this transformation is impaired, resulting in reduced placental perfusion that triggers an inflammatory response, resulting in the release of proinflammatory cytokines and creating an imbalance of proangiogenic and antiangiogenic factors.

In the second half of pregnancy, this inflammatory process produces the classic signs and symptoms that form the basis for the preeclampsia diagnosis.19, 20 The endothelial lining of blood vessels throughout the maternal circulation is damaged, causing systemic vasoconstriction and, in turn, hypertension.20 The damaged endothelium increases the likelihood of clot formation at the sites of endothelial damage. Products of coagulation are consumed in the formation of clots, reducing their availability in the maternal circulation and increasing the risk of bleeding. Increased vascular permeability causes fluid to move from the maternal capillaries into the interstitial space, producing edema, hemoconcentration, and reduced blood flow. Edema and vasoconstriction impair liver function, decreasing the availability of albumin and key coagulation products. Reduced renal blood flow activates the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system, worsening vasoconstriction. Increased permeability of the renal glomerular capillaries allows protein, primarily albumin, to pass into the glomerular filtrate and be excreted in urine. Throughout the maternal system, endothelial dysfunction and reduced perfusion increase blood pressure and cause symptoms such as headache, visual disturbances, and epigastric pain.

Back to Top | Article Outline

PREECLAMPSIA RISK FACTORS

Table 2

Table 2

A number of preexisting and pregnancy-related risk factors have been associated with preeclampsia (see Table 21, 20-22). A recent meta-analysis evaluated the relationship between preeclampsia and 14 clinical factors that can be assessed at or before 16 weeks’ gestation: personal history of preeclampsia, prior placental abruption, prior fetal growth restriction, prior stillbirth, nulliparity, advanced maternal age (variously defined as over 35 and over 40), overweight (BMI above 25 kg/m2) or obesity (BMI above 30 kg/m2), chronic hypertension, prepregnancy diabetes mellitus (type 1 or type 2), chronic kidney disease, systemic lupus erythematosus, antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, assisted reproduction, and multifetal pregnancy.21 Other than prior fetal growth restriction, all clinical factors were significantly associated with an increased risk of preeclampsia. Factors with the highest pooled unadjusted relative risks for preeclampsia were a personal history of preeclampsia and chronic hypertension.21

Although we are currently unable to predict preeclampsia, information related to these risk factors should be collected at a woman's first prenatal visit. This information can assist health care providers in identifying women who may be at elevated risk for preeclampsia and may benefit from increased surveillance or preventive measures. For example, women with a history of early-onset preeclampsia that resulted in delivery at less than 34 weeks’ gestation or preeclampsia in more than one prior pregnancy may benefit from daily low-dose aspirin therapy initiated late in the first trimester.1 The absence of risk factors, however, does not guarantee that an otherwise healthy woman will not develop preeclampsia during or immediately following her pregnancy. In fact, most cases of preeclampsia are diagnosed in healthy nulliparous women.1 For this reason, it is of utmost importance that all women be monitored routinely for preeclampsia throughout pregnancy and in the postpartum period. Additionally, pregnant women should be informed about preeclampsia warning signs so they can be active participants in their own health care.

Back to Top | Article Outline

EMERGING APPROACHES TO PREECLAMPSIA

The care of women with preeclampsia is significantly limited by the lack of cost-effective screening tests that can reliably identify risks early in pregnancy and interventions that can effectively prevent or treat all variations of preeclampsia, which differ in presentation, onset, and severity.20 However, as preeclampsia pathogenesis is better defined, targets for screening, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment are emerging.

Preeclampsia screening. Ideally, care of pregnant women should include selective and sensitive screening tests that identify preeclampsia risk factors before the development of overt, later-stage maternal signs and symptoms indicative of widespread pathology. Emerging screening tests are focusing on pathologies that occur in the early stages of pregnancy and are related to biomarkers in maternal blood, as well as to placental development and perfusion.23, 24

Biomarkers in maternal blood. Genetic alterations associated with angiogenic balance25 and inflammation26 provide support for continued investigation into placental pathology and biomarkers for risk detection. Certain proteins found to be overexpressed in first- and second-trimester blood samples drawn from women who later developed preeclampsia have been identified as potential preeclampsia biomarkers.27 When used alone, these proteins have little value for accurately predicting preeclampsia, but they may be helpful in clinical practice when used in conjunction with other tests.28 Although single biomarkers show promise, the greatest potential for early identification of preeclampsia—in the first or second trimester, before the onset of signs and symptoms—lies in combining biomarkers and clinical parameters.29

Placental perfusion. The ability to measure functional placental response and substances released in response to reduced placental perfusion may provide a means to diagnose preeclampsia before the onset of signs and symptoms in later pregnancy. Decreased placental perfusion is a common finding in women diagnosed with preeclampsia and can be measured using uterine artery Doppler velocimetry.30 However, the value of measuring placental perfusion in early pregnancy may be limited,31 even when coupled with maternal preeclampsia biomarkers, which are not necessarily universal across all preeclampsia phenotypes.20

Immune factors are also a target of investigation in preeclampsia. It is well established that maternal immune tolerance is necessary to allow the genetically distinct fetus to grow and develop without rejection, and there is evidence of increased risk of preeclampsia when the interval between pregnancy and first vaginal exposure to paternal semen is short, as when the father is a new sexual partner, or the woman has been using a barrier contraceptive with an established sexual partner until shortly before becoming pregnant.32 The association between preeclampsia and inflammation point to proinflammatory cytokines, such as C-reactive protein33 and interleukin-6,34 as potential biomarkers of disease.

Potential preeclampsia prophylaxis. Because oxidative stress as a consequence of poor placental perfusion has been implicated in preeclampsia, it's been suggested that antioxidants, such as lutein, may play a role in preeclampsia prevention.35 Two 2015 Cochrane reviews, however, found no benefit to routine antioxidant supplementation with vitamins C or E for this purpose, and the ACOG Task Force does not recommend routine use of either to prevent preeclampsia.1, 36, 37

For women at high risk for preeclampsia, use of low-dose aspirin started at or before 16 weeks’ gestation is believed to target placental pathology by balancing the endothelial products prostacyclin, a vasodilator, and thromboxane, a vasoconstrictor that induces platelet aggregation.38, 39 The ACOG Task Force recommends that the use of aspirin for preeclampsia prevention be limited to women with a history of early-onset preeclampsia that required delivery before 34 weeks’ gestation or preeclampsia in more than one prior pregnancy.1

Back to Top | Article Outline

NURSING MANAGEMENT OF PREECLAMPSIA

The absence of definitive strategies to prevent preeclampsia limits nurses’ ability to provide anticipatory guidance and teach patients evidence-based approaches for reducing preeclampsia risk. Nurses can, however, encourage all women planning pregnancy to work toward achieving a healthy body weight and consume a healthy diet replete with recommended nutrients. Current guidance is to limit foods with added sugars and those that are high in fat and to eat a variety of fruits, grains, vegetables, low-fat or fat-free dairy, and proteins, avoiding such sources of mercury as shark, swordfish, mackerel, and tilefish, and limiting the consumption of another source, tuna, to less than six ounces per week.

Current screening approaches include preeclampsia risk identification through the collection of demographic information and comprehensive personal and family history. Risks related to a short time interval between exposure to paternal semen and pregnancy can be assessed through a review of sexual history that includes duration of the sexual relationship and use of a barrier birth control method. A personal or family history of preeclampsia may provide an opportunity to discuss potential screening and diagnostic strategies.

Warning signs of preeclampsia can occur during the second half of pregnancy and in the postpartum period. These include severe headache, right upper quadrant epigastric pain, nausea, visual changes (such as loss of visual fields or seeing spots), difficulty breathing, and swelling in areas such as the face or hands.40 Nurses play a key role in teaching pregnant women about these subtle, subjective warning signs.

Accurate blood pressure measurement is crucial. Ask the patient to sit comfortably—with her back supported, her feet flat on the floor, and her arm at heart level. Select the proper cuff size based on the patient's arm circumference, and measure blood pressure on the same arm each time.

Changes in body weight may indicate fluid imbalance associated with generalized edema. A weight gain of more than three to five pounds in one week, reduced urine output, or the presence of edema, including pulmonary edema, suggest preeclampsia-associated fluid imbalance, especially during the second half of pregnancy.

Preeclampsia diagnosis and surveillance. Blood and urine tests may provide objective evidence of preeclampsia during pregnancy and in the postpartum period. Upon diagnosis of preeclampsia, maternal and fetal surveillance is initiated to determine progression and severity. Maternal assessment includes evaluation of subjective symptoms, serial blood pressure measurement, physical assessment, and laboratory analyses to guide intervention. Fetal surveillance includes serial nonstress testing to evaluate fetal oxygenation, ultrasound measurement of amniotic fluid volume as a proxy for fetal–placental perfusion, and estimation of fetal growth and gestational age. The nonstress test may be accompanied by a biophysical profile, scored based on ultrasound measurements of fetal breathing, body movements, muscle tone, and amniotic fluid level. Umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry, which measures blood flow in the umbilical cord or between the uterus and the placenta, may be indicated as a follow-up if there are concerns related to reduced placental perfusion.

Determining optimal timing of delivery. Gestational age at diagnosis and severity of preeclampsia are major factors in determining optimal timing of delivery, which is the only way to reverse preeclampsia that occurs during pregnancy. The ACOG Task Force recommends delivery for women with preeclampsia who are at or beyond 37 weeks’ gestation or who are between 34 and 37 weeks’ gestation and have preeclampsia with severe features.1 In women between 20 and 34 weeks’ gestation, preeclampsia with severe features is ideally managed in a facility with adequate maternal and neonatal intensive care resources. Because of the risk of preterm birth, care includes corticosteroid administration to enhance fetal lung maturity.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Pharmacologic treatment for severe sustained hypertension in pregnancy and the postpartum period is instituted when systolic blood pressure rises to or above 160 mmHg or when diastolic blood pressure rises to or above 110 mmHg. The goal is to stabilize blood pressure at 140–150/90–100 mmHg (see Figure 241). If blood pressure is reduced to below established goals, perfusion to maternal organs and the fetus may be insufficient. Nursing management includes assessment of maternal response to antihypertensive therapy.

Magnesium sulfate may be used for seizure prophylaxis and control in women who have preeclampsia with severe features, or eclampsia.1 Typical administration includes a loading dose of 4 to 6 g iv infused over a period of 15 to 20 minutes, followed by a maintenance dose of 1 to 3 g iv per hour. Nursing management includes assessment for magnesium toxicity, evidenced by loss of consciousness, absent deep tendon reflex activity, and a respiratory rate below 12 breaths per minute. As magnesium sulfate is excreted by the kidneys, urine output below 30 mL per hour increases the risk of toxicity.42 Fluid replacement should be judicious, even with oliguria, as preeclampsia predisposes women to fluid imbalance.

Long-term risk of cardiovascular disease. Since preeclampsia is an established risk factor for cardiovascular disease, nurses should reinforce with patients the importance of long-term follow-up. The ACOG Task Force recommends that women with a history of either preeclampsia and preterm delivery or recurrent preeclampsia undergo yearly assessments that measure blood pressure, lipid levels, fasting blood glucose levels, and BMI.1

Back to Top | Article Outline

CONCLUSION

KW's case highlights the progressive and multisystemic nature of preeclampsia. Although clinical management of preeclampsia continues to be symptom based, emerging approaches for the prediction and prevention of preeclampsia are continuously being evaluated for their potential use in evidence-based clinical care. In the interim, nurses continue to play a major role in the care and education of women with and at risk for preeclampsia. For helpful information to assist nurses, pregnant women, and preeclampsia survivors, see Preeclampsia Resources.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Preeclampsia Resources

Foundations and Organizations

Reports and Books

Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES

1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy. Hypertension in pregnancy. Washington, DC; 2013. www.acog.org/Resources-And-Publications/Task-Force-and-Work-Group-Reports/Hypertension-in-Pregnancy.
2. Schmella MJ, et al Uric acid determination in gestational hypertension: is it as effective a delineator of risk as proteinuria in high-risk women? Reprod Sci 2015 22 10 1212–9
3. Thangaratinam S, et al Estimation of proteinuria as a predictor of complications of pre-eclampsia: a systematic review BMC Med 2009 7 10
4. Homer CS, et al Non-proteinuric pre-eclampsia: a novel risk indicator in women with gestational hypertension J Hypertens 2008 26 2 295–302
5. Thornton CE, et al Role of proteinuria in defining pre-eclampsia: clinical outcomes for women and babies Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 2010 37 4 466–70
6. National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on High Blood Pressure in Pregnancy. Report of the National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on High Blood Pressure in Pregnancy Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000 183 1 S1–S22
7. Abalos E, et al Global and regional estimates of preeclampsia and eclampsia: a systematic review Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2013 170 1 1–7
8. Ananth CV, et al Pre-eclampsia rates in the United States, 1980-2010: age-period-cohort analysis BMJ 2013 347 f6564
9. Abalos E, et al Pre-eclampsia, eclampsia and adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes: a secondary analysis of the World Health Organization multicountry survey on maternal and newborn health BJOG 2014 121 Suppl 1 14–24
10. Say L, et al Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis Lancet Glob Health 2014 2 6 e323–e333
11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Pregnancy mortality surveillance system. 2017. https://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/maternalinfanthealth/pmss.html.
12. Brown MC, et al Cardiovascular disease risk in women with pre-eclampsia: systematic review and meta-analysis Eur J Epidemiol 2013 28 1 1–19
13. Duley L The global impact of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia Semin Perinatol 2009 33 3 130–7
14. Kuklina EV, et al Hypertensive disorders and severe obstetric morbidity in the United States Obstet Gynecol 2009 113 6 1299–306
15. Davis EF, et al Pre-eclampsia and offspring cardiovascular health: mechanistic insights from experimental studies Clin Sci (Lond) 2012 123 2 53–72
16. Fraser A, et al Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and cardiometabolic health in adolescent offspring Hypertension 2013 62 3 614–20
17. Kajantie E, et al Pre-eclampsia is associated with increased risk of stroke in the adult offspring: the Helsinki birth cohort study Stroke 2009 40 4 1176–80
18. Timpka S, et al Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and offspring cardiac structure and function in adolescence J Am Heart Assoc 2016 5 11
19. Redman C The six stages of pre-eclampsia Pregnancy Hypertens 2014 4 3 246
20. Phillips C, Boyd M Assessment, management, and health implications of early-onset preeclampsia Nurs Womens Health 2016 20 4 400–14
21. Bartsch E, et al Clinical risk factors for pre-eclampsia determined in early pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis of large cohort studies BMJ 2016 353 i1753
22. Ebbing C, et al Risk factors for recurrence of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, a population-based cohort study Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2017 96 2 243–50
23. Akolekar R, et al Competing risks model in early screening for preeclampsia by biophysical and biochemical markers Fetal Diagn Ther 2013 33 1 8–15
24. Tsiakkas A, et al Competing risks model in screening for preeclampsia by maternal factors and biomarkers at 30-34 weeks’ gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016;215(1):87 e1- e17.
25. Bell MJ, et al Variation in endoglin pathway genes is associated with preeclampsia: a case-control candidate gene association study BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2013 13 82
26. Best LG, et al Correction: two variants of the C-reactive protein gene are associated with risk of pre-eclampsia in an American Indian population PLoS One 2013 8 9
27. Kolialexi A, et al Proteomics for early prenatal screening of pregnancy complications: a 2017 perspective Expert Rev Proteomics 2017 14 2 113–5
28. Zhong Y, et al Serum screening in first trimester to predict pre-eclampsia, small for gestational age and preterm delivery: systematic review and meta-analysis BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2015 15 191
29. Wu P, et al Early pregnancy biomarkers in pre-eclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis Int J Mol Sci 2015 16 9 23035–56
30. Yesil A, et al Identification of patients at risk for preeclampsia with the use of uterine artery Doppler velocimetry and copeptin J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2017 30 22 2763–8
31. Andrietti S, et al Repeat measurements of uterine artery pulsatility index, mean arterial pressure and serum placental growth factor at 12, 22 and 32 weeks in the prediction of preeclampsia Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2017 50 2 221–7
32. Saftlas AF, et al Cumulative exposure to paternal seminal fluid prior to conception and subsequent risk of preeclampsia. J Reprod Immunol 2014;101-102:104-10.
33. Rebelo F, et al C-reactive protein and later preeclampsia: systematic review and meta-analysis taking into account the weight status J Hypertens 2013 31 1 16–26
34. Ribeiro VR, et al Association between cytokine profile and transcription factors produced by T-cell subsets in early- and late-onset pre-eclampsia Immunology 2017 152 1 163–73
35. Cohen JM, et al The association between maternal antioxidant levels in midpregnancy and preeclampsia Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015 213 5 695 e1-e13
36. Rumbold A, et al Vitamin E supplementation in pregnancy Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015 9 CD004069
37. Rumbold A, et al Vitamin C supplementation in pregnancy Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015 9 CD004072
38. Mone F, et al An open-label randomized-controlled trial of low dose aspirin with an early screening test for pre-eclampsia and growth restriction (TEST): trial protocol Contemp Clin Trials 2016 49 143–8
39. Villa PM, et al Aspirin in the prevention of pre-eclampsia in high-risk women: a randomised placebo-controlled PREDO Trial and a meta-analysis of randomised trials BJOG 2013 120 1 64–74
40. Black KD, Morin KH Development and testing of the Preeclampsia Prenatal Symptom-Monitoring Checklist (PPSMC) J Nurs Meas 2014 22 1 14–28
41. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Committee on Obstetric Practice. Committee Opinion No. 692: emergent therapy for acute-onset, severe hypertension during pregnancy and the postpartum period Obstet Gynecol 2017 129 4 e90–e95
42. Simpson KR, Knox GE Obstetrical accidents involving intravenous magnesium sulfate: recommendations to promote patient safety MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs 2004 29 3 161–9

For 150 additional continuing nursing education activities related to maternal–child topics, go to www.nursingcenter.com/ce.

Keywords:

clinical management; nursing care; preeclampsia; pregnancy complication; pregnancy-induced hypertension; risk factors

Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.