Increasing numbers of families are living with a parent with HIV , creating challenges for parents to decide whether, how, and when to disclose their HIV status to their children [2–4]. Clinicians often encourage serostatus disclosure [5,6], yet there are few empirical data on which to base these recommendations [7,8]. Studies of disclosure of parents’ serostatus have been based primarily on qualitative observations [9,10] and case examples [11,12]. Therefore, the first goal of this study is to describe trends in the patterns of parents’ disclosures of HIV status to their children over time.
After documenting patterns of parent's HIV disclosures, this paper examines the characteristics associated with such patterns. Health status was examined: parents with other diseases  disclose their health status more frequently to their children when their health deteriorates, as do hemophiliac fathers with HIV . Effective parenting varies based on children's age, sex, and the ethnic background of the family , as does disclosure to children of parental illness in previous studies [7,14–16]. Therefore, these factors were examined. HIV disclosure is lower if stigma is anticipated [17,18]. Therefore, we evaluated parents’ perceptions of their children's HIV-related stigma, regardless of whether parents had disclosed to their children.
Disclosure may also be influenced by a variety of social cognitive factors. Persons with high self-esteem are more open , therefore, we hypothesized that parents living with HIV (PLH) who reported higher self-esteem may disclose more to their children. Moreover, mental health symptoms may increase the likelihood of disclosure of serostatus to their children , suggesting parents with mental health symptom may disclose more. In contrast, self-destructive or passive coping styles  were anticipated to be associated with fewer disclosures of serostatus to children. Thus, based on previous research, we examined the relationship of disclosure to self-esteem, emotional distress, coping styles, health status, ethnicity, perceptions of stigma, and their child's age and sex.
Finally, in order to provide clinical recommendations on the benefits or costs of disclosure, the impact of disclosure on children's behavioral and emotional adjustment is examined. In cross-sectional assessments of hemophiliac fathers  and mothers of younger children , parents’ disclosure of HIV infection is not related to the children's adjustment. However, parents’ disclosure of serostatus to adolescents has been associated with a short-term negative impact on adjustment among adolescents . This study examines the relationship between disclosure and adolescent children's adjustment over 5 years.
Materials and methods
The New York City Division of AIDS Services (DAS) has a log of 95% of persons with AIDS qualified for social welfare benefits. From August 1993 to March 1995, 619 persons were logged by DAS. The eligibility criteria were: being HIV-infected; having at least one adolescent child aged 11–18 years; and permission of the case managers to enroll. During this period, only one PLH was referred to DAS per family. Of the 619 potential participants, 155 died prior to being approached and 35 cases managers evaluated that the research project could be potentially harmful to a family. Of the 619 PLH logged, 429 (69.3%) were eligible; of these 429, 65 (15%) were untraceable, 46 (10.7%) refused participation, and 11 (3%) were ineligible because of severe illness or incarceration. Thus, 71.5% (n = 307/429) of eligible PLH were recruited, reflecting 84% (n = 307/364) of the traceable PLH. Five years after recruitment, 149 (48.5%) of the PLH had died.
While the DAS was mandated to serve only persons with AIDS, not all parents had AIDS diagnosis: at recruitment, only 40% self-reported an AIDS diagnosis (n = 119), 42% were HIV symptomatic (n = 126), and 19% were without HIV symptoms (asymptomatic; n = 56). The sample was recruited during the period when a CD4 cell count < 200 × 106/l was a new AIDS criterion, leading parents not to recognize their status. Only 82% knew their CD4 cell counts; among these parents the mean CD4 cell count was 187 × 106/l (standard deviation, 177.5). Self-reports of CD4 cell counts were highly correlated to CD4 cell counts in medical chart reviews .
These data were collected as part of a randomized controlled intervention study  with n = 153 families in intervention and n = 154 in the control condition. Delivered in two modules (23 sessions), module 1 addressed parents’ ability to cope with negative affect related to their health status, to make disclosure decisions, and to reduce problem behaviors. Module 2 included both parents and adolescents. Parents learned to parent while ill and make custody plans; for adolescents it focused on reducing problem behaviors, improving parent–child relationships and reducing emotional distress. We monitored additional counseling services received regarding disclosure issues; 36 parents received these services at some point over 5 years.
Highly trained interviewers conducted assessments in participants’ homes using laptop computers every 3 months for the first 2 years of the study, and then at 6-month intervals to 5 years (n = 15 assessments). The follow-up rates were lowest during the first year (mean PLH, 68.5%; mean adolescents, 66.5%), and increased with training during the second year of follow-up (mean PLH, 85%; mean adolescents, 81.5%). The rates for years 3, 4 and 5 continued to increase for PLH (88.1%), but were slightly lower (76.4%) for adolescents. PLH and adolescents each received US$ 25 per interview.
HIV-related disclosures to each child
For each child in their family (adolescents and younger children) disclosures were rated as: 1, told the child nothing of their diagnosis; 2, disclosed that he/she was ill; 3, disclosed that he/she had a chronic illness; 4, disclosed that he/she was infected with HIV; 5, disclosed that he/she had AIDS; or 6, disclosed that he/she was dying. Based on pilot work, the seriousness of the disclosure was anticipated to be rank-ordered on the 1–6 categorization. Multiple categories could be endorsed for each child at each assessment. Therefore, in addition to recording the highest level of disclosure, disclosures were classed as: not having occurred (0), if parents told nothing, that they were ill, or chronically ill; or as having occurred (1), if parents disclosed an HIV or AIDS diagnosis, or that they were dying.
These included sex, age, living situation, and socioeconomic status.
HIV diagnosis and health status
This included the date of the parent's identification as being HIV seropositive, being symptomatic or asymptomatic for HIV, and their CD4 cell counts.
The Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI)
The BSI  included the parents’ rating of the level of severity for each of the 53 symptoms during the previous week on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely) yielding a global score for emotional distress (α = 0.97).
The sum of the presence (1) or absence (0) of unprotected sexual intercourse, alcohol use, drug use, and contact with the criminal justice system was calculated for each assessment period.
The Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale
The Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale  includes a 10-item scale with endorsements of self-perceptions ranging from 1 (strongly agree) to 4 (strongly disagree) scale (α = 0.85).
Family life stressors and stressful life events
These were expressed as a sum of the presence (1) or absence (0) of 14 stressful family events (e.g. arguments between parents; α = 0.66), and six stressful life events (e.g., change of residence; α = 0.61).
Coping styles  were rated on a scale of 1 (never) to 5 (always) scale for 40 items that yields seven subscale scores (positive action, self-destructive escapism, passive problem solving, passive action, spiritual hope, non-disclosure, and seeking social support; α = 0.46–0.88).
Perceived stigma experienced by children was rated as present (1) or absent (0) on five items (e.g., recent HIV-related assaults; α = 0.82).
Social support reflected the number of important persons listed; the mean number of network members was 3.79 (standard deviation, 2.44; range, 1–14).
Similar to parents, adolescents were interviewed regarding their: (i) self-esteem using the Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale; (ii) emotional distress using the Brief Symptom Inventory; and (iii) problem behaviors. In addition, adolescents completed the Parental Bonding Instrument with 25 items that reflect two inversely-related dimensions: (i) care (12 items; α = 0.83); and (ii) overprotection (13 items; α = 0.72) [27,28].
All disclosure data were organized by the child to whom the disclosure was made. Time from parental notification of HIV status to their disclosure to each child was calculated. Observations were censored at the time of parental death or 60 months following recruitment, whichever came first. Kaplan–Meier curves were plotted to examine the time from the date of notification of HIV status to disclosure based on parental sex, child sex and age. Using SUDAAN software , Cox proportional hazard models were conducted, controlling for family membership (as there was more than one child per family). Variations in the rate of mothers and fathers’ disclosures were examined for their sons and daughters (sex of parent × sex of child interaction).
To examine factors associated with disclosure, three separate analyses were conducted. First, using logistic regression in SAS software, the factors associated with disclosure were examined when disclosure had occurred at the time of recruitment. In each of these analyses, the time since notification of serostatus, age and the sex of the parent and the child were controlled. Parent's education, emotional distress, problem behaviors, self-esteem, family life events, stressful life events, and coping styles were examined as potential factors associated with disclosure. In a second analysis using SUDAAN software, predictors of disclosure were observed prospectively among those who had not disclosed at the time of recruitment, but who eventually disclosed to one ore more of their children over the next 5 years. In this second analysis, control and predictive variables were examined that were similar to the variables used in the first set of regressions.
Finally, the impact of parental disclosure on adolescent children's adjustment was analyzed. As many parents had disclosed prior to recruitment, it was difficult to interpret the impact of disclosure for censored observations. Therefore, the patterns over time for each index of adolescent adjustment based on parents’ disclosures at the time of recruitment were examined. Simultaneously, the slope and intercept for each index of adjustment were estimated for children to whom parents disclosed over the course of the study. Mixed effects models  were used to compare the slope and intercept for adolescents who were monitored prospectively and those for whom disclosure had occurred prior to study initiation. Adjustment was defined in terms of emotional distress, self-esteem, problem behaviors, and parental bonding.
Description of the sample
Six parents did not report whether they had disclosed to their children; therefore, these participants were excluded from future analysis. Of the 301 PLH, 247 (82%) were mothers; 34.5% were African–American, 44.5% were Latino, 11% were white and 10% were of other ethnic backgrounds; and the mean age was 38.0 years old (SD, 5.6 years). Ethnicity, intervention condition and receiving any counseling did not emerge as significant predictors of disclosure in any analysis and so data for these factors are not presented.
Among 301 PLH, there were 787 children at the time of recruitment: 10% (n = 82) were 5 years old or younger; 23% (n = 182) were aged 6–11 years; 24% (n = 191) were aged 12–14 years; 26% (n = 208) were aged 15–17 years, and 16% (n = 124) were aged 18 years or more. There were no sex differences in the distribution of children's ages. Overall, 48% were female. At the time of recruitment, children were a mean of 12.7 years old (SD, 4.9 years; median, 14 years). Eight children were born after recruitment.
Disclosure and associations with sex and age
About 30% of the parents disclosed to at least one child within 1 month of diagnosis, 6% disclosed within 2–3 months; 11% disclosed at 4–12 months, 16% disclosed within 1–3 years, 21% disclosed more than 3 years after diagnosis, and 12% did not disclose to any of their children prior to their death (i.e., among the 354 children of the 146 parents who died). At disclosure, most parents not only disclosed their HIV status, but they also discussed their AIDS diagnosis and possible death.
Disclosure varied based on the sex of both the parent and the child. The Kaplan–Meier curves in Fig. 1 demonstrate a significant difference in the probability of non-disclosure based on the parents’ sex. Mothers disclosed significantly earlier and were more likely to disclose than fathers [hazard ratio (HR), 2.02; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.25–3.26; P = 0.0041], after controlling for the random effect of family membership and children's age. Mothers were also significantly more likely to disclose earlier to their daughters than to their sons (HR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.09–1.62; P = 0.004), controlling for family membership and children's age (Fig. 2). The disclosure rates among fathers, however, did not vary based on the children's sex (P = 0.29).
There were significant differences in disclosure based on the age of the child, as shown in Fig. 3. The bars on Fig. 3 indicate, for each age group, the percentage of children to whom the parents had disclosed over 5 years. Parents were significantly more likely to disclose to their older children (P < 0.0001). When the child was aged 4–6 years, about 10% of children were told of their parents’ serostatus. At around age 10–12 years, parents had disclosed to 40% of their children and by 13–15 years, the percentage of parents who had disclosed had increased to 60%. Based on the Cox proportional hazard model, the estimated probability of disclosure was plotted for each age group for 1, 3, and 5 years following notification of parental HIV status.
The percentage of families in which no child was told about parental HIV status decreased from 48% to 12% over time; the percentage of families in which all children were told increased over time from 26% to 60%. However, the percentage of families in which only some of the children knew their parents’ HIV status was relatively constant over time (20–30%), creating a family secret.
Parental factors associated with disclosure
At the time of recruitment, parents’ disclosures were not significantly related to the parents’ level of emotional distress on the BSI (P = 0.09). Disclosure rates were also independent of self-esteem (P = 0.42), education (P = 0.91), financial status (P = 0.38), and problem behaviors (P = 0.83). However, disclosures were significantly related to parents’ stressful life events and their family life events (P = 0.0013 and P = 0.02, respectively). The number of stressful life events and family life events was higher among parents who had disclosed than among parents who had not disclosed. Parental HIV status at recruitment (AIDS, symptomatic, asymptomatic) was also related to disclosure: parents with a more severe diagnosis were more likely to disclose to their children (P = 0.026). Disclosure rates were also significantly associated with parents’ perceptions of the HIV-related stigmatization of their children (P = 0.035); parents who had disclosed reported that their children experienced significantly more HIV-related stigma than did parents who had not disclosed [odds ratio (OR), 2.81; 95% CI, 1.07–7.35; P = 0.035]. Lastly, there was a relationship between disclosure and social networks: parents with larger social networks (P = 0.004) were more likely to disclose to their children.
At recruitment, parents had not disclosed to 334 of their 787 children. Over the next 5 years, parents disclosed to 104 of these children (31%). Prospective survival analysis indicates that parents who disclosed were significantly more likely to have AIDS or to be symptomatic for HIV (P = 0.035). They also used more self-destructive coping styles than non-disclosing parents (P = 0.017). Yet, our prospective analysis did not reveal a relationship between parental disclosure and emotional distress, self-esteem, perceptions of stigma, problem behaviors, education, ethnicity, other coping styles or financial status.
The impact of disclosure on adolescents
At recruitment, 32% of adolescents (n = 127) learned of their parents’ HIV status within the previous year, 26.5% (n = 105) were disclosed to from 1 to 3 years prior to recruitment, and 20% (n = 81) were told of their parents’ serostatus more than 3 years earlier; 82 adolescents (20%) received no disclosure regarding their parents’ HIV status. The changes over time for problem behaviors and negative family events were similar for the three subgroups learning of the disclosure prior to recruitment. Therefore, analyses focused on the differences between adolescents learning parental serostatus prior to recruitment (n = 313) or later (n = 82).
Problem behaviors were significantly higher among adolescents knowing parental serostatus at recruitment compared to those were non-disclosed (P = 0.035). However, problem behaviors decreased over time among the disclosed (slope = −0.00217) and increased among the non-disclosed (slope = 0.003), a significant difference (P = 0.009). A similar pattern was seen for negative family life events. At recruitment, disclosed adolescents reported significantly more negative family life events than non-disclosed adolescents (P = 0.017). However, those events decreased over time among disclosed adolescents (slope = −0.01) and were significantly different from non-disclosed adolescents (slope = 0.000; P < 0.0001). Adolescents who knew their parents’ serostatus were not different in terms of emotional distress, self-esteem, or parental bonding.
There are strengths and weaknesses to the current study. New York City, representing one-third of the AIDS cases in the USA, logs all persons diagnosed with AIDS allowing us to examine a cohort representing 71.5% of the eligible cases. Fortunately, the refusal rate (10.7%) was low. One of the strengths is that the PLH were primarily African–American and Latino, persons frequently understudied . Another strength is that follow-up rates were high over 15 assessments over 5 years. However, the repeated assessments may lead to reactive self-reports . Furthermore, because this analysis is linked to an adolescent intervention study, PLH that had only young children (< 12 years) are not included in the cohort. The parents in this study are likely to be older than parents with only younger children. Also, we do not have comprehensive assessments of the adolescents’ HIV status; although we do know that none of the adolescents were infected perinatally and only one adolescent has tested HIV positive over the 5 years.
Given the sample, the parents’ HIV disclosures appear to be similar to disclosure patterns of other types of sensitive information [33–37] and HIV disclosure to partners in other populations [7,22,38,39]. Mothers disclose more than fathers and more to their daughters than to their sons. Older children are more likely to receive a disclosure. Parent's disclosures increased as their health deteriorates, although most disclosures occur 2–4 years prior to death (49%) rather than close to death (7% within 1 year). One unexpected finding emerges: disclosure does not vary by ethnicity, as was shown by earlier research .
Most importantly, disclosure appears normative; over time, parents were much more likely to disclose, regardless of the age and sex of the child. Within 3 months of their diagnoses as seropositive, 36% of parents disclosed. In most families (60%), all children knew their parents’ HIV status. Therefore, interventions encouraging disclosure will only speed up a naturally occurring process in a country such as the USA.
However, disclosures impact adolescents negatively; intervention challenges emerge about how to reduce this impact. The clinical literature suggests that family secrets are destructive . About 20–30% of families in this sample report having such a secret among some of the children over time. It may be that all children within the family know the parent's serostatus, but there is a tacit agreement among family members not to acknowledge this. Because of ethical concerns, we could not inquire from adolescents about their parent's disclosures; future research must identify a methodology to overcome this barrier and examine the impact of secrets regarding HIV status on families.
Unexpectedly, the negative impacts of disclosure on both parents and their adolescent children persist for a considerable period of time. Parents who disclose report significantly more stressful life events, family stressors, and perceive that their children experience HIV-related stigma. Simultaneously, adolescents who are told about their parents’ serostatus report more problem behaviors and more negative family events. These findings indicate significant costs to the parents and their children for disclosing; clinicians should consider these costs in recommending disclosure.
When parents wait a long time to disclose, self-destructive coping styles are related to disclosing to their children. Perhaps such disclosures are precipitated by negative events (such as parental relapse into substance abuse); qualitative research must clarify the relationship. In addition there is a long list of factors related to disclosure that has been found in families with cancer [37,41]. Parent's mental health status, self-esteem and SES are unrelated to disclosure in this study.
As the quality and duration of life for PLH has increased , there appears to be less urgency to disclose one's serostatus to children. In this study, disclosures are common, but associated with a cluster of negative outcomes for both parents and their adolescent children for an extended period. Because PLH now routinely visit physicians, the medical setting offers a venue for providing support regarding decisions about whether, when and how to disclose their serostatus to their children.
In particular, as more than one-third of parents disclose very soon after their HIV diagnosis, post-test counseling with seropositive parents should encourage a delay in disclosure until the parent deals with their own feelings of anger, fear or depression prior to disclosing to their children. The parent then has an opportunity to plan their disclosure and not to use the disclosure to get support for themselves from their child. The parent will be better prepared to support their child.
If parents are discouraged from disclosing, an implicit message is communicated that HIV is stigmatizing and must be hidden. We are not advocating hiding one's status. Yet, without appreciation of the long process involved when disclosing, parents are likely to be unprepared for the consequences of disclosure. Individual parents must consider their own families’ circumstances and each child within that family when making their decision whether, when and how to disclose.
This paper was completed with the support of National Institute of Mental Health grants #1ROI MH49958-04 and P30 MH58107. We thank the parents, caregivers, adolescents, and staff and collaborators.
1.World Health Organization. Facts and Figures. 1999 World AIDS Campaign. Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS. Geneva: UNAIDS; 1999.
2.Armistead L, Forehand R. For whom the bell tolls: Parenting decisions and challenges faced by mothers who are HIV seropositive. Clini Psychol: Science Pract 1995, 3:239–250.
3.American Academy of Pediatrics. Disclosure of illness status to children and adolescents with HIV infection. Pediatrics 1999, 103:164–166.
4.Committee on Psychosocial Aspects of Child and Family Health. The pediatrician and childhood bereavement. Pediatrics 1992, 89:516–518.
5.Draimin BH. Everything You Need to Know When a Parent has AIDS. New York: Rosen Publishing Group; 1994.
6.Dane B. Mourning in secret: how youngsters experience a family death from AIDS. In Orphans of the HIV Epidemic. Edited by Levin C. New York: United Hospital Fund of New York; 1993: 60–68.
7.Armistead L, Klein K, Forehand R, Wierson M. Disclosure of parental HIV infection to children in the families of men with hemophilia: Description, outcomes, and the role of family processes. J Fam Psych 1997, 11:49–61.
8.Mellins CA, Brackis-Cott E, Dolezal C, Richards A, Nicholas S, Abrams EJ, et al. Patterns of HIV status disclosure to perinatally HIV-infected children and subsequent mental health outcomes. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2002, 7:101–114.
9.Faithful J. HIV-positive and AIDS-infected women: Challenges to mothering. Am J Orthopsych 1997, 67:144–151.
10.Yoshioka MR, Schustack A. Disclosure of HIV status: Cultural issues of Asian patients. AIDS Patient Care STDS 2001, 15:77–82.
11.Huber CH. Facilitating disclosure of HIV-positive status to family members. Family J – Counsel Ther Couples Families 1996, 4: 53–55.
12.Zayas LH, Romano K. Adolescents and parental death from AIDS. In: AIDS and the New Orphans. Edited by Dane BO, Levine C. Westport: Auburn House; 1994:59–76.
13.Rosenheim E, Reicher R. Informing children about a parent's terminal illness. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1985, 26:995–998.
14.Alwin DF. Changes in family roles and gender differences in parental socialization values. Sociolog Stud Child Dev 1991, 4:201–224.
15.Raveis VH, Siegel K, Karus D. Children's psychological distress following the death of a parent. J Youth & Adolesc 1999, 28:165–180.
16.Chisholm L. Adolescent girls and schooling: gender, youth and transitions. Comenius 1993, 52:540–469.
17.Petrak JA, Doyle AM, Smith A, Skinner C, Hedge B. Factors associated with self disclosure of HIV serostatus to significant others. Br J Health Psychol 2001, 6:69–79.
18.Pierret J. Everyday life with AIDS/HIV: surveys in the social sciences. Soc Sci Med 2000, 50:1589–1598.
19.Crocker J, Major B. Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma. Psychol Rev 1989, 96:608–630.
20.Rotheram-Borus MJ, Lee MB, Gwadz M, Draimin B. An intervention for parents with AIDS and their adolescent children. Am J Public Health 2001, 91:1294–1302.
21.Armistead L, Tannenbaum L, Forehand R, Morse E, Morse P. Disclosing HIV status: are mothers telling their children? J Pediatr Psychol 2001, 26:11–20.
22.Rotheram-Borus MJ, Draimin BH, Reid HM, Murphy DA. The impact of illness disclosure and custody plans on adolescents whose parents live with AIDS. AIDS 1997, 11:1159–1164.
23.Murphy DA, Rotheram-Borus MJ, Joshi V. HIV-infected adolescent and adult perceptions of tuberculosis testing, knowledge and medication adherence in the USA. AIDS Care 2000, 12: 59–63.
24.Derogatis LR, Melisaratos N. The Brief Symptom Inventory: an introductory report. Psychol Med 1983, 13:595–605.
25.Rosenberg M. Society and The Adolescent Self-Image. Princetion, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1965.
26.Namir S, Wolcott DL, Fawzy FI, Alumbaugh MJ. Coping with AIDS: psychological and health implications. J Appl Soc Psychol 1987, 17:309–328.
27.Parker G, Tupling H, Brown LB. A parental bonding instrument. Br J Med Psychol 1979, 52:1–10.
28.Weissman MM, McAvay G, Goldstein RB, Nunes EV, Verdeli H, Wickramaratne PJ. Risk/protective factors among addicted mothers’ offspring: a replication study. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 1999, 25:661–679.
29.Shan BV, Barnwell BG, Bieler GS. SUDAAN User's Manual, Release 7.5. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute; 1997.
30.SAS. SAS/STAT Software: Changes and Enhancements through Release 6.12. Cary, NC: SAS Institute; 1997.
32.The National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Multisite HIV Prevention Trial Group. The NIMH Multisite HIV Prevention Trial: Reducing HIV sexual risk behavior. Science 1998, 280:1889–1894.
33.Jourard SM. Healthy Personality: An Approach from the Viewpoint of Humanistic Psychology. New York: Macmillan; 1974.
34.Cook R, Golombok S, Bish A, Murray C. Disclosure of donor insemination: Parental attitudes. Am J Orthopsychiatry 1995, 65:549–559.
35.Berger M, Hodges J. Some thoughts on the question of when to tell the child that he is adopted. J Child Psychother 1982, 8: 67–87.
36.MacIntyre JC. Resolved: children should be told of their adoption before they ask: Affirmative. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1990, 29:828–829.
37.Henderson BN. Disease disclosure patterns among breast cancer patients. University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, US: UMI Order number AAM0599393. Dissertation Abstracts International, Section B, The Sciences & Engineering. University Microfilms International 1999, 59(8-B):4465.
38.Thorne C, Newell ML, Peckham CS. Disclosure of diagnosis and planning for the future in HIV-affected families in Europe. Child Care Health Dev 2000, 26:29–40.
39.Wiener LS, Battles HB, Heilman NE. Factors associated with parents’ decision to disclose their HIV diagnosis to their children. Child Welfare 1998, 77:115–135.
40.Cottle TJ. Children's Secrets. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley/Addison Wesley Longman, Inc; 1980.
41.Jourard SM. A study of self-disclosure. Sci Am 1958, 198: 77–82.
© 2002 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.