Skip Navigation LinksHome > April 24, 2014 - Volume 28 - Issue 7 > The protective effect of HIV-2 infection: implications for...
AIDS:
doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000000209
Editorial Comments

The protective effect of HIV-2 infection: implications for understanding HIV-1 immunity

Kanki, Phyllis J.a; Rowland-Jones, Sarahb

Free Access
Article Outline
Collapse Box

Author Information

aDepartment of Immunology & Infectious Disease, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts

bNuffield Department of Medicine, NDM Research Building, Old Road Campus, Oxford, UK.

Correspondence to Phyllis J. Kanki, Department of Immunology & Infectious Disease, Harvard School of Public Health, 651 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115, USA. E-mail: pkanki@hsph.harvard.edu

Received 6 January, 2014

Revised 8 January, 2014

Accepted 8 January, 2014

HIV-2 was first described in 1985 in West Africa on the basis of its antigenic relationship to HIV-1 and the SIV [1,2]. Since that time, several international research collaborations have sought to understand the pathogenicity of this closely related HIV virus and the impact of its interaction with the prototype HIV-1 infection in vivo. Coexisting in West Africa with HIV-1, HIV-2, by contrast generally demonstrates an attenuated phenotype for transmission and disease [3,4]. In rural Guinea Bissau, a more bimodal outcome has been described with HIV-2 progressors indistinguishable from HIV-1 progressors, and HIV-2 controllers (35–40%) maintaining undetectable viral load for 10–15 years, with a normal life expectancy [5]. In 1995, the concept that HIV-2 might protect from HIV-1 infection was raised from long-term studies of the registered sex worker cohort in Dakar, Senegal [6,7]. The generalizability of these findings was questioned by studies from Ivory Coast, Guinea Bissau and the Gambia [8–10]. Continued virologic and immunologic studies of HIV-2 over the past three decades have continued to support the attenuated phenotype or unique ‘elite control’, which remains of interest in our quest to better understand the immunopathogenesis of HIV-1, identify correlates of protective immunity and develop appropriate interventions [11].

Esbjornsson et al.[12], in this issue of AIDS, report on the longer survival time for HIV-1 and HIV-2 dually infected individuals than for individuals who were singly HIV-1 infected. HIV-2 and HIV-1 dual-infected individuals with an HIV-2 infection preceding the HIV-1 infection had lower mortality than HIV-1 singly infected individuals. The study was based on a well characterized longitudinal cohort of police followed for more than 20 years in Guinea-Bissau, a country with the largest documented HIV-2 infection in the 1980s, with up to 8% adult prevalence [13]. These authors have previously reported that subjects who had HIV-2 infection prior to the acquisition of HIV-1 had a significantly longer time to the development of AIDS compared to subjects acquiring HIV-1 in the absence of prior HIV-2 infection [14]. The current study is distinct from the previous published study, distinguished by the outcome of all-cause mortality, longer follow-up and the dissection of the sequence of infection resulting in dual infection.

Prince et al.[15] conducted a literature review and meta-analysis and found no evidence of delayed progression to death in dually infected individuals. Esbjornsson et al.[12] discuss some of the possible explanations for the apparent discrepancy in these studies. The analysis by Prince et al.[15] included seven West African studies, which were conducted largely on seroprevalent patients, with a focus on hospitalized patients. The seven studies had differing study designs, widely variable loss to follow-up rates and generally shorter observation times [15]. Esbjornsson et al.[12] observe that the rate of CD4+ T-cell decline is similar between single and dual-infected participants, whereas the absolute levels at the presumed date of infection are quite distinct; therefore, studies without a reliable seroconversion date will inevitably lead to misinterpretation. Finally, the seven studies included in the meta-analysis varied widely in the sex ratio of study participants, ranging from 14.8 to 100% women [15]. The Guinea Bissau police cohort is somewhat unusual in having a majority of HIV-2-infected individuals that are men, inviting speculation that sex could play a role in the disparate results [12,14]. It is also worth considering that differences between different epidemiological studies may reflect the extensive host genetic diversity in this part of Africa, particularly in the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) and killer immunoglobulin-like receptor (KIR) genes that are known to influence the outcome of HIV-1 and HIV-2 infection and that differ significantly between different ethnic groups in West Africa [16].

The methods for classification of HIV dual-infected individuals have differed between research groups for decades [17]. Although equally sensitive and type-specific PCR diagnosis of proviral DNA should be considered the gold standard, this type of assay has been rarely verified or widely used [17,18]. Three of the seven studies in the meta-analysis used PCR to augment serologic diagnoses [15]. As Esbjörnsson et al.[12] indicate, the evaluation of sequential serum samples analysed with the same assay that changed from a mono-infected HIV-2 to dual HIV-2 and HIV-1 reactivity should improve the accuracy of the HIV-dual diagnosis [14]. The additional data from PCR studies provided in the digital content material are also reassuring; although potentially three of 29 individuals may have been misclassified, a reanalysis did not alter the conclusions of the study [12].

Although the implications of HIV-2 and HIV-1's interactions in vivo have now been debated for decades, there are significant virologic and immunologic studies that could explain how prior HIV-2 infection might alter the pathogenesis of HIV-1 disease progression. In vitro, stimulated HIV-2-infected lymphocytes express beta-chemokines that inhibit HIV-1 infection with CCR5 viruses [19,20]. In addition to HIV-2's demonstrated robust cytotoxic lymphocyte responses [21,22], accompanying granzyme production would elicit beta-chemokines resulting in the demonstrated downregulation of the CCR5 receptor on CD4+ bearing cells [23], rendering the target for HIV-1 and HIV-2 viruses less susceptible to infection. Intriguingly, in the cohort studied by Esbjornsson et al. [14], HIV-1 disease progression was most attenuated in HIV-2-infected individuals who had stable asymptomatic disease. This raises the possibility that HIV-1 was inhibited by immune mechanisms associated with HIV-2 control and delayed disease progression, for which CD8+ gag-specific T-cells would be the most obvious candidate, a response that is absent in more than 50% of those with progressive disease [22]. Extensive cross-reactivity has been demonstrated between HIV-1 and HIV-2 epitopes, particular for CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells directed against the most conserved regions of the gag proteins [24]. It is therefore plausible that the potent and unusually high avidity T-cell responses [25] elicited by HIV-2 contribute to the control of HIV-1 replication in vivo. Although HIV-2 infection is also characterized by a very potent neutralizing antibody response that sometimes cross-neutralize HIV-1, the neutralization of HIV-1 is less potent and there is no relationship between neutralizing activity and clinical status [26,27]. HIV-2 infection results in a low-level persistent viral infection [28], which elicits robust humoral, innate and adaptive cellular immunity; cross-reactivity likely inhibits the replication of HIV-1 and ensuing disease progression. This may also explain why the diminished disease phenotype is not apparent in individuals who were infected with HIV-1 prior to HIV-2 [12]. The mounting of the immune response to HIV-2 would be critical to the protective effect for both HIV-1 immunopathology and the development of disease.

Since its initial discovery, studies of HIV-2 in infected individuals in West Africa have provided compelling evidence for potential mechanisms that may be critical to the pathogenicity of HIV viruses in general. At the time of its discovery, HIV-2 was shown to be endemic in West Africa, with more sporadic distribution globally, often linked to the former Portuguese sea trade [29]. However, its prevalence has been diminishing over the past 30 years and it is likely that the opportunity for further in-vivo study may soon disappear [30,31]. The results of the study by Esbjornsson et al. [12] reinforce the critical need for research to further investigate the virologic and immunologic mechanisms responsible for HIV-2's attenuated phenotype and protection from HIV-1 disease with significant implications for HIV therapy and vaccine development.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Acknowledgements

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Back to Top | Article Outline

References

1. Barin F, Mboup S, Denis F, Kanki PJ, Allan JS, Lee TH, et al. Serological evidence for virus related to simian T-lymphotropic retrovirus III in residents of West Africa. Lancet 1985; ii:1387–1390.

2. Clavel F, Guetard D, Brun-Vezinet F, Chamaret S, Rey MA, Santos-Ferreira MO, et al. Isolation of a new human retrovirus from West African patients with AIDS. Science 1986; 233:343–346.

3. Kanki PJ, Travers KU, Mboup S, Hsieh CC, Marlink RG, Gueye-Ndiaye A, et al. Slower heterosexual spread of HIV-2 than HIV-1. Lancet 1994; 343:943–946.

4. Marlink R, Kanki P, Thior I, Travers K, Eisen G, Siby T, et al. Reduced rate of disease development with HIV-2 compared to HIV-1. Science 1994; 265:1587–1590.

5. Schim van der Loeff M, Larke N, Kaye S, Berry N, Ariyoshi K, Alabi A, et al. Undetectable plasma viral load predicts normal survival in HIV-2 infected people in a West African village. Retrovirology 2010; 7:46.

6. Travers K, MBoup S, Marlink RG, Gueye-Ndiaye A, Siby T, Thior I, et al. Natural protection against HIV-1 infection provided by HIV-2. Science 1995; 268:1612–1615.

7. Travers KU, Eisen GE, Marlink RG, Essex ME, Hsieh CC, Mboup S, et al. Protection from HIV-1 infection by HIV-2. AIDS 1998; 12:223–226.

8. Ariyoshi K, Schim van der Loeff M, Sabally S, Cham F, Corrah T, Whittle H. Does HIV-2 infection provide cross-protection against HIV-1 infection?. AIDS 1997; 11:1053–1054.

9. Greenberg AE. Possible protective effect of HIV-2 against incident HIV-1 infection: review of available epidemiological and in vitro data. AIDS 2001; 15:2319–2321.

10. Schim van der Loeff M, Aaby P, Aryioshi K, Vincent T, Awasana AA, Da CostaF C, et al. HIV-2 does not protect again HIV-1 infection in a rural community in Guinea-Bissau. AIDS 2001; 15:2303–2310.

11. Nyamweya S, Hegedus A, Jaye A, Rowland-Jones S, Flanagan KL, Macallan DC. Comparing HIV-1 and HIV-2 infection: lessons for viral immunopathogenesis. Rev Med Virol 2013; 23:221–240.

12. Esbjörnsson J, Månsson F, Kvist A, Isberg P-E, Biague AJ, da Silva ZJ, et al. Increased survival among HIV-1 and HIV-2 dual-infected individuals compared to HIV-1 single-infected individuals. AIDS 2014; 28:949–957.

13. Poulsen AG, Aaby P, Frederiksen K, Kvinesdal B, Molbak K, Dias F, et al. Prevalence of and mortality from human immunodeficiency virus type 2 in Bissau, West Africa. Lancet 1989; 333:827–831.

14. Esbjornsson J, Mansson F, Kvist A, Isberg PE, Nowroozalizadeh S, Biague AJ, et al. Inhibition of HIV-1 disease progression by contemporaneous HIV-2 infection. N Engl J Med 2012; 367:224–232.

15. Prince PD, Matser A, Van Tienen C, Whittle HC, Schim Van Der Loeff MF. Mortality rates in people dually infected with HIV-1/2 and those infected with either HIV-1 or HIV-2: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AIDS 2013; [Epub ahead of print].

16. Yindom LM, Leligdowicz A, Martin MP, Gao X, Qi Y, Zaman SMA, et al. Influence of HLA class 1 and HLA-KIR compound genotypes on HIV-2 infection and markers of disease progression on a Manjako community in West Africa. J Virol 2010; 84:8202–8213.

17. WHO. Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). Proposed WHO criteria for interpreting results from western blot assays for HIV-1, HIV-2, and HTLV-I/HTLV-II. Wkly Epidemiol Rec 1990; 65:281–283.

18. Walther-Jallow L, Andersson S, da Silva Z, Biberfeld G. High concordance between polymerase chain reaction and antibody testing of specimens from individuals dually infected with HIV types 1 and 2 in Guinea-Bissau, West Africa. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 1999; 15:957–962.

19. Akimoto H, Kaneko H, Sekigawa I, Hashimoto H, Kaneko Y, Yamamoto N. Binding of HIV-2 envelope glycoprotein to CD8 molecules and related beta -chemokine production. Immunology 1998; 95:214–218.

20. Kokkotou EG, Sankalé JL, Mani I, Gueye-Ndiaye A, Schwartz D, Essex M, et al. In vitro correlates of HIV-2 mediated HIV-1 protection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000; 97:6797–6802.

21. Dieng Sarr A, Lu Y, Sankalé JL, Eisen G, Popper S, Mboup S, et al. Robust HIV Type 2 cellular immune response measured by a modified anthrax toxin-based enzyme-linked immunospot assay. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 2001; 17:1257–1264.

22. De Silva TI, Peng Y, Leligdowicz A, Zaidi I, Li L, Griffin H, et al. Correlates of T-cell-mediated viral control and phenotype if CD8+T cells in HIV-1, a naturally contained human retroviral infection. Blood 2013; 121:4330–4339.

23. Shea A, Dieng-Sarr A, Jones N, Penning L, Eisen G, Gueye-Ndiaye A, et al. CCR5 receptor expression is down-regulated in HIV-2 infection: implication for viral control and protection. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 2004; 20:630–635.

24. Zheng NN, McElrath MJ, Sow PS, Hawes SE, Diallo-Agne H, Stern JE, et al. Role of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-specific T-cell immunity in control of dual HIV-1 and HIV-2 infection. J Virol 2007; 81:9061–9071.

25. Leligdowicz A, Onyango C, Yindom LM, Peng Y, Cotton M, Jaye A, et al. Highly avid, oligoclonal, early-differentiated antigen-specific CD8+ T cells in chronic HIV-2 infection. Eur J Immunol 2010; 40:1963–1972.

26. Rodriguez SK, Dieng-Sarr A, MacNeil A, Meloni S, Gueye-Ndiaye A, Traore I, et al. Comparison of heterologous neutralizing antibody responses between HIV-1 and HIV-2 infected Senegalese patients: distinct patterns of breadth and magnitude distinguish HIV-1 and HIV-2. J Virol 2007; 81:5331–5338.

27. De Silva TI, Aasa-Chapman M, Cotton M, Hué S Robinson J, Bibollet-Ruche F, et al. Potent autologous and heterologous neutralizing antibody responses occur in HIV-2 infection across a broad range of infection outcomes. J Virol 2012; 86:930–946.

28. Popper SJ, Dieng-Sarr A, Travers KU, Gueye-Ndiaye A, Mboup S, Essex M, et al. Lower HIV-2 viral load reflects the difference in pathogenicity of HIV-1 and HIV-2. J Infect Dis 1999; 18:1116–1121.

29. Smallman-Raynor M, Cliff A. The spread of human immunodeficiency virus type 2 into Europe: a geographical analysis. Int J Epidemiol 1991; 20:480–489.

30. Anderson RM, May RM. The population biology of the interaction between HIV-1 and HIV-2: coexistence or competitive exclusion?. AIDS 1996; 10:1663–1673.

31. Forbi JC, Esona MD, Iperepolu HO, Adoga MP, Agwale S. Absence of routine molecular testing and prevalence of HIV-2 infection in regions hardest-hit by HIV infection. J Infect Dev Ctries 2012; 6:854–859.

Keywords:

HIV-1; HIV-2; HIV-dual infection; mortality; survival

© 2014 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

Login

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.