Skip Navigation LinksHome > July 17, 2013 - Volume 27 - Issue 11 > Impact of HIV drug resistance on virologic and immunologic f...
doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3283611931
Epidemiology and Social

Impact of HIV drug resistance on virologic and immunologic failure and mortality in a cohort of patients on antiretroviral therapy in China

Liao, Lingjiea,*; Xing, Huia,*; Su, Binb,*; Wang, Zhec,*; Ruan, Yuhuaa; Wang, Xiaa; Liu, Zhendongd; Lu, Yanane; Yang, Shimeif; Zhao, Quanbia; Vermund, Sten H.g; Chen, Ray Y.h; Shao, Yiminga

Open Access
Supplemental Author Material
Article Outline
Collapse Box

Author Information

aState Key Laboratory for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, and National Center for AIDS/STD Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention

bAnhui Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hefei, Anhui

cHenan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Zhenzhou, Henan

dFunan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Funan

eYingzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Yingzhou, Anhui

fQueshan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Queshan, Henan, China

gDepartment of Pediatrics and Institute for Global Health, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee

hNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, US National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

*Lingjie Liao, Hui Xing, Bin Su and Zhe Wang contributed equally.

Correspondence to Yiming Shao, MD, PhD, State Key Laboratory for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, and National Center for AIDS/STD Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China, No.155 Changbai Road, Changping District, Beijing 102206, China. Tel: +86 10 5890 0981; fax: +86 10 5890 0980; e-mail:

Supplemental digital content is available for this article. Direct URL citations appear in the printed text and are provided in the HTML and PDF versions of this article on the journal's Website (

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivitives 3.0 License, where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially.

Received January 5, 2013

Accepted March 10, 2013

Collapse Box


Objectives: To study the dynamics of HIV drug resistance (HIVDR) and its association with virologic and immunologic failure as well as mortality among patients on combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) in China.

Design: We recruited 365 patients on cART in two rural Chinese counties in 2003–2004 and followed them every 6 months until May 2010.

Methods: Virologic failure, HIVDR, immunologic failure and death were documented. We used Kaplan–Meier and the proportional hazards models to identify the timing of the events, and risk factors for mortality.

Results: At the end of study, patients had been followed for 1974.3 person-years, a median of 6.1 years. HIVDR mutations were found in 235 (64.4%) patients and 75 died (20.5%, 3.8/100 person-years). Median time from cART to detection of virologic failure was 17.5 months, to HIVDR 36.6 months and to immunologic failure 55.2 months (≈18-month median interval between each adverse milestone). Being male, having a baseline CD4+ cell count of less than 50 cells/μl and HIVDR were associated with higher mortality. Patients who developed HIVDR in the first year of treatment had higher mortality than those developing HIVDR later (adjusted hazard ratio 1.90, 95% confidence interval 1.01–3.48).

Conclusion: HIVDR was common and was associated with higher mortality among Chinese patients on cART, particular when HIVDR was detected early in therapy. Our study reinforces the importance of improving patient adherence to cART in order to delay the emergence of HIVDR and obviate the need to switch to costly second-line drug regimens too early.

Back to Top | Article Outline


Since 1996, combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) has prolonged the lifespan of AIDS patients dramatically and has reduced HIV-related morbidity [1]. Except for a few countries such as Brazil and South Africa with earlier cART introduction [2,3], most developing countries began cART after the 2003 recommendation of the WHO ‘Three by Five’ goal in the scale-up of national ART programmes [4]. The subsequent rapid emergence of HIV drug-resistant mutants with their potential threat of transmission caused great concern for the long-term benefits and sustainability of cART roll-out in resource-limited countries [5]. However, studies conducted to date in resource-limited settings have studied the emergence of HIV drug resistance (HIVDR) and long-term outcomes only through short-term (typically 12 months) follow-up [6,7].

After a pilot cART programme in 2002, China scaled up the National Free Antiretroviral Treatment Program to provide free cART to HIV-infected patients in 2003 [8]. Initially, most patients entering the program were former plasma donors (FPDs) who acquired HIV infection in the mid-1990s through unhygienic plasmapheresis procedures in central China [9]. Initial first-line regimens consisted of didanosine (ddI) with either zidovudine (ZDV) or stavudine (d4T) as the second drug and nevirapine (NVP) as the third. Didanosine was replaced by lamivudine (3TC) around 2005. Treatment was predominantly conducted in village clinics [8] with almost no access to second-line drugs. In this study, we investigate the emergence of HIVDR and its effect on mortality in the initial group of cART-treated patients in rural, central China followed up to 6 years.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Materials and methods

Study population

An observational cohort study enrolled patients from Queshan County, Henan Province and Fuyang County, Anhui Province from December 2003 to December 2004. Patients who were 18 years of age or older and started cART between 2003 and 2004 were included. All patients approached through informed consent agreed to participate in the study. Patients were followed every 6 months up to 31 May 2010, or to stopping cART, death or loss to follow-up. Data on demographics and risk factors for HIV infection were collected at baseline and information on treatment and outcomes was collected at every follow-up visit, and confirmed with the National cART Database. This study was approved by the institutional review board of the National Center for AIDS/STD Control and Prevention (NCAIDS), Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

Back to Top | Article Outline
Laboratory tests

Blood samples were collected by the local CDC at enrolment and every follow-up visit. Samples were sent at ambient temperature to the laboratory of NCAIDS in Beijing within 8 h, where a team was on-call 24 h for 7 days a week for receipt; CD4+ cell count, viral load and HIVDR genotyping were performed. CD4+ cell count was conducted using flow cytometry (FACS Calibur, BD Company, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, USA) within 2 h after arriving at the NCAIDS laboratory. Plasma was isolated and frozen at −80oC until testing for viral load or drug resistance. Plasma HIV RNA was quantified with real-time NASBA (NucliSense Easy Q, bioMérieux, Lyon, France) or with Amplicor HIV-1 monitor test (COBAS, Roche Applied Science, Penzberg, Germany) according to the manufacturers’ recommendations. For samples with viral load of at least 1000 copies/ml, HIVDR genotyping was performed at NCAIDS using an in-house PCR protocol as previously described [10]. HIV-1 drug resistance was determined according to the Stanford University's HIV Drug Resistance Database Program version 6.2.0 (, accessed 2 November 2012). We included all drug resistance mutations that conferred low, intermediate or high-level resistance [11].

Back to Top | Article Outline
Study outcomes

Drug resistance was defined as identification of any drug-resistant mutation during cART. We assumed that patients had no transmitted drug-resistant mutations prior to cART initiation because they were among the first group of patients to receive cART in China [12]. The date of drug resistance was defined as the date of initial diagnosis of drug-resistant mutation.

The date of virologic failure was defined as the first recorded date of plasma viral load of more than 5000 copies/ml after 6 months of treatment, as per the 2010 WHO guideline on antiretroviral therapy for HIV infection in adults and adolescents [13]. Similarly, the date of immunologic failure was also defined by WHO criteria [13] as the earliest date of any one of the following after 6 months of treatment: posttreatment CD4+ cell count falling to or below baseline CD4+ cell count; 50% decrease from peak CD4+ cell count; or two consecutive CD4+ cell counts of less than 100 cells/μl or last CD4+ cell count of less than 100 cells/μl. Baseline CD4+ cell count was defined as the last pretreatment count within 6 months of treatment. If no pretreatment CD4+ cell count was done, the earliest count within 1 month of starting treatment was used for the baseline value.

Deaths were recorded by the local clinics. Given the inability of medical facilities in rural areas to determine the cause of death accurately, we assumed all deaths to be HIV-related.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Statistical analysis

We plotted Kaplan–Meier curves to assess the time to virologic failure, drug resistance, immunologic failure and death. We also plotted time from drug resistance to death. Patients were censored if they stopped their cART (typically for intolerance) or were lost to follow-up. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to explore risk factors for death. For the mortality analysis, we examined risk factors deemed plausible, including original treatment regimen, sex, education, marital status, occupation, baseline CD4+ cell count, baseline viral load and replacing ddI with 3TC and drug resistance as time-dependent covariates.

For the subanalysis of mortality in patients with drug resistance, the start point was changed as the time that drug resistance was first detected, and CD4+ cell count and viral load at the first detection of drug resistance were included, as well as baseline characteristics such as sex, education and marital status. Variables with P values less than 0.1 in univariate analyses were entered into the multivariable model. All statistical analyses were performed with SAS 9.1 software (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA).

Back to Top | Article Outline


Characteristics of participants

Of the 376 patients initiating ART between 2003 and 2004, 11 patients (2.9%) were excluded because they died (nine within 6 months of ART initiation, two between 6–12 months) with no recorded CD4+ cell count, viral load or drug resistance data. Among the 365 individuals included in the study, 51.2% were from Queshan County in Henan Province and 48.8% from Fuyang County in Anhui Province (Table 1). A majority of individuals were women (59.7%), median age at enrolment was 39 years (range 25–64 years), 72.3% had received primary school education or less, 97.8% were farmers and 84.7% were married or living with their partner. Nearly all the individuals (96.7%) were FPDs.

Table 1
Table 1
Image Tools

Baseline CD4+ cell counts and viral load were available from 193 (161 before and 32 within 1 month of starting ART) patients (52.9%) with median CD4+ cell count of 257 cells/μl and median viral load of 4.5 log copies/ml plasma. Of note, 61.1% of patients initiated ART with a CD4+ cell count more than 200 cells/μl (Table 1), despite the treatment guidelines at that time indicating cART to be given when CD4+ cell count was less than 200 cells/μl or with WHO stage III or IV disease.

All patients initially received either ZDV/ddI/NVP (51.0%), or d4T/ddI/NVP (49.0%). By 31 May 2010 or death, whichever came first, 153 out of 365 (41.9%) patients had substituted ddI with 3TC and 212 (58.1%) patients remained on ddI-based regimens. Excluding baseline values, participants had a median of eight CD4+ cell counts [interquartile range (IQR) 5–10], eight viral load measurements (IQR, 5–10) and eight HIVDR genotypes (IQR, 5–9). At their last visits, 27 patients (7.4%) had stopped cART for at least 6 months. By 2010, 17 patients (4.7%) had been lost to follow-up. Participants were followed for a total of 1974.3 person-years, with a median of 6 years and 1 month (mean 5 years and 5 months) follow-up per patient.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Distribution of time to endpoint events

At the end of the study period, a cumulative 76.4% (279/365) of patients had experienced virologic failure, for an incidence of 14.1 per 100 person-years, and drug-resistant mutations were found in 235 out of 365 (64.4%; 11.9/100 person-years) patients. Immunologic failure was noted in 207 out of 365 (56.7%) patients, for an incidence of 10.5 per 100 person-years, and 75 (20.5%; 3.8/100 person-years) had died. The median times to identification of virologic failure, drug resistance and immunologic failure from the date of cART initiation by Kaplan–Meier plot were 17.5, 36.6 and 55.2 months, respectively, demonstrating a significant increase in median time required from virologic failure to drug resistance, to immunologic failure and to death (P < 0.001; Fig. 1a). Among patients with adverse milestones, the given event occurred at a median of nearly 18 months apart.

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Image Tools
Back to Top | Article Outline
Predictors of mortality

In a Cox proportional hazards model (Table 2), factors independently associated with mortality included being males (adjusted hazard ratio 1.9, P = 0.005, compared with female patients), baseline CD4+ cell count less than 50 cells/μl (adjusted hazard ratio 4.3, P = 0.002, compared with CD4+ cell count >350 cells/μl) and having detected HIVDR (adjusted hazard ratio 3.4, P < 0.001). We plotted the Kaplan–Meier life survival curves from the time drug resistance was first detected. Patients with their first detectable drug resistance in the first year of cART had a higher probability of death than those having drug resistance beyond the first year (P = 0.002, log rank test; Fig. 1b). In a Cox proportional hazards model using a start point as the time drug resistance was first detected (Table 3), death was associated with having detectable drug resistance within the first year of treatment (adjusted hazard ratio 1.9, P = 0.046) after adjusting for CD4+ cell count and viral load at the time of detection of HIVDR.

Table 2
Table 2
Image Tools
Table 3
Table 3
Image Tools
Back to Top | Article Outline
Emergence of HIV drug resistance

The rate of any nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI)-related resistance mutation increased over time from the end of year 1 (9.6%) to the end of year 6 (30.0%, P < 0.001 for trend; Fig. s1a, Among the NRTI-based drug-resistant mutations, T215FSY was the most frequently seen at all time points. M41L, M184V and L210W were also commonly seen, with the rates for these four mutations increasing over time (P < 0.001 for trend). Thymidine analogue-associated mutation type 1 (TAM1) mutations (M41L/L210W/T215Y) were more common than TAM2 mutations (D67N/K70R/T215F/K219QE) after 1 year post-cART initiation, and became twice as frequent as the latter from year 4 on. Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-related drug-resistant mutations appeared early and peaked in year 4 at 42.2%, finishing at 35.7% in year 6 (Fig. s1b, The most common NNRTI-resistance mutations detected were K103NS, Y181CI, G190AS and K101EP.

We further analysed mutation patterns when drug resistance was firstly detected in a given year of treatment. More than 95% of patients had NNRTI-related mutations at the first detection. However, the proportion of NRTI-related mutations was quite different between years (P < 0.001; Fig. 2a); persons with detectable drug-resistant mutations within the first year of cART had the lower rate with 23.5% of NRTI-related mutations, whereas those who had drug resistance detected beyond the first year had 50.4% of NRTI-related mutations. The differences were mainly found in the occurrence of TAMs (Fig. s2,, such as M41L (P = 0.001), D67N (P = 0.001), K70R (P = 0.009) and T215Y (P = 0.005). When drug resistance was detected for the first time, the median viral load of patients differed significantly depending upon whether HIVDR appeared within the first year of cART (4.9 log copies/ml) or after the first year (4.1 log copies/ml, P < 0.001; Fig. 2b).

Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Image Tools
Back to Top | Article Outline


Our cohort study was conducted among patients who were predominantly farmers and FPDs in two counties in central China. They acquired HIV-1 through unhygienic plasmapheresis practices (reinfusion of pooled red blood cells) in the mid-1990s. In 2004, they were the first patients in China to receive free cART through the National Free ART Program. After 6 years of follow-up on first-line cART in our longitudinal study, adverse events had become commonplace: a cumulative three-quarters had failed virologically, nearly two-thirds developed drug resistance mutations, over half had failed immunologically and one-fifth had died. For patients with adverse events, median intervals of about 18 months each separated virologic failure (at 17.5 months) from HIVDR (at 36.6 months) from immunologic failure (at 55.2 months). Hence, if a patient is suboptimally virally suppressed, our real-world experience in a poor, rural region of China suggests about a year and half between each of these three adverse events: virologic failure, HIVDR and immunologic failure. Our disappointing drug resistance finding (a cumulative 64.4% of the cohort) highlights the challenges found with an unfamiliar chronic disease receiving lifelong treatment in a subsistence farming culture.

Many studies have examined the relationship between virologic failure and drug resistance [14–16], virologic failure and immunologic failure [17–19], virologic failure and death [17,19,20], drug resistance and death [21], immunologic failure and resistance [22], and immunologic failure and death [19,20]. Our study has the advantage of having examined thoroughly these relationships in one single cohort analysis; our median clinical follow-up of over 6 years in the absence of widely available second-line treatment offers data unique in the literature. It is notable that individuals experienced virologic failure before the emergence of drug resistance in the cohort study. Reasons for such a sequence may include a relatively low adherence or insufficient dosing with which drug concentration could not reach the threshold for drug resistance viruses outgrowing wild viruses [23]. The limitation of consensus genotypic testing inhibits the detection of minor viral quasispecies with an abundance of less than 10–20% [24]. Nevertheless, our results underscore the importance of viral load measurement as the primary marker of treatment efficacy and suggest the importance of switching cART regimens when there is evidence of virologic failure, to prevent the accumulation of drug resistance.

The cumulative rate of drug resistance was 24.2% at 12 months of treatment and 37.9% at 24 months, higher than the rates reported in other low and middle-income countries scaling-up cART. Malawi, for example, had 12% drug resistance in patients on treatment for more than 6 months [25]. Cameroon had resistance levels of 4.4% after 12 months of treatment and 16.9% at 24 months [26]. The reasons for these differences are likely multifactorial and may be related to provider experience, structural factors such as convenience of medication refills, patient adherence, stigma and levels of patient disclosure to others, and initial treatment regimen used, including drug side effects and tolerance [27,28]. In a multicentre study among antiretroviral-naive patients in China, persons on a 3TC-based treatment regimen had much higher rates of virologic suppression (less than 50 copies/ml) than those on a ddI-based regimen (68.2 vs. 39.7%, P < 0.001) [29].

In our analysis of risk factors associated with mortality, advanced immunosuppression at treatment initiation was the strongest risk factor, consistent with global experiences [8,30]. Our study also demonstrated an association between HIVDR and mortality, consistent with previous studies [21,31]. In addition, patients who developed HIVDR during treatment were nearly two-fold more likely to die than those who developed HIVDR later. The need for early adherence education and monitoring when starting ART must be stressed, as it was the earliest treatment failures who suffered the most adverse clinical outcomes. It also underscores the WHO HIVDR monitoring strategy, putting an emphasis on the first year of cART.

When HIVDR viruses were first detected, we found that drug resistance mutation patterns were quite different between patients acquiring detectable HIVDR in the first year and those who developed HIVDR later. Three-quarters of people developing HIVDR in their first year of cART had solitary NNRTI-resistant mutations, whereas half of the patients with later onset of HIVDR had both NRTI and NNRTI-resistant mutations. Some NRTI-resistant mutations, especially TAMs including M41L, K70R, T215FY and L210W, can reduce viral replicative fitness [32]. Even though we do not know whether replicative fitness differences are an important contributor to the higher mortality seen, there was significantly higher viral load in the group with detectable HIVDR in the first year of treatment than the later onset HIVDR group. In individuals receiving NNRTI-based cART, persons with lower (<75%) medication adherence had a higher risk of HIVDR than those with moderate-to-high (75–100%) level of adherence [33]. Early onset of drug resistance suggests poor adherence and hence incomplete viral suppression, likely from near the beginning of cART use, and persons with early HIVDR consequently have a higher risk of other adverse events and death.

Careful selection of the proper initial first-line regimens can improve both effectiveness and sustainability of cART. This is especially crucial for the public health scale-up of cART, wherein large numbers of patients are on the same regimens and there are fewer monitoring resources for follow-up of individuals and for community-wide assessments. Different levels of antiretroviral drug toxicity, drug–drug interactions, varying pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenomics, and socioeconomic limitations all affect cART adherence dramatically [23]. At the early stage of China's National Free Antiretroviral Treatment Program, suboptimal regimens were chosen due to limited resources and accessibility of the best antiretroviral drugs. The initially used regimens, NVP and ddI along with ZDV or d4T, may have less potency and more side effect than other later regimens (TDF and an NNRTI along with 3TC, for example). A lack of optimized regimens likely contributes to lower medication adherence. In addition, NVP has a much longer half-life than other drug components; low adherence may result in NVP monotherapy and predispose to virologic failure and drug resistance.

Countries with limited resources may still want to use more potent and less toxic first-line cART regimens, as the long-term costs may be offset by maximizing the effects and sustainability of the first-line treatment, minimizing or delaying emergence of HIVDR, and easing the burden on intensive treatment monitoring. When to change virologically failing treatment regimens in resource-limited settings with limited second-line treatment options is a challenging question, given realities of drug availability and cost [34]. Our study explored the time to virologic failure, drug resistance, immunologic failure and death in a remote rural area before the availability of second-line cART regimens. Because drug-resistant mutations impair viral fitness and replication, thereby partially suppressing plasma viral load [32,35,36], there may be benefit of continuing failing treatment regimens in patients when they have no access to second-line treatment options, especially in those with advanced HIV. Our study suggested as much, as patients who had detectable drug resistance beyond the first year of cART (later onset) seemed to benefit from partially active first-line regimens, experiencing reduced mortality compared with persons with earlier onset of HIVDR (within the first year of cART). However, our study also showed that the continuation of a virologically failing regimen was associated with an increased risk of resistance mutation accumulation. The decision of when to change regimens needs to balance these risks and benefits, as well as consider economic factors and long-term effects of first-line and second-line treatment [37].

The principal strength of our study is the long 6-year follow-up of our patients for the continuum of adverse virologic, immunologic and clinical outcomes in the context of HIVDR; other cohorts have been followed for only 12–24 months to study emergence of HIVDR. We also had a follow-up rate of more than 95% over 6 years and were able to assess laboratory specimens quickly, despite the remote rural setting. There are two notable limitations to our study. The first is that our study has uncertain generalizability, as it was conducted in two locations among FPDs. It is likely that this cohort is representative of FPDs because they generally had similar demographics and were infected with the same strain of HIV-1 at a short window period of blood contamination between 1993 and 1995 [9,38]. Furthermore, a recent analysis of HIV mortality in China found similar mortality risks among a variety of at-risk cohorts [30]. Although adherence rates may vary among different populations and therefore the specific timing of HIVDR emergence may vary, the overall sequence of events from virologic failure to death is consistent with the current literature. A second limitation is that about half of the patients were missing baseline CD4+ cell count and viral load data due to the sudden start of cART to save lives, even before laboratory services were established. However, an analysis between those with and without baseline data showed no significant differences in either demographics or mortality rate; so, biases should be minimal (Table 2).

In conclusion, our clinical cohort study examined the frequency, sequence and timing of the emergence of virologic failure, genotypic resistance, immunologic failure and death in rural Chinese farmers on cART over 6 years. Failing treatment regimens were not changed due to limited resources and availability of second-line drugs. The cohort was stopped when second-line drugs became available and the seriousness of their unavailability was made clear from the data that emerged from our study. The median timing of these events was about one and half years between adverse milestones, but the interval times between these benchmarks would differ, we believe, on the basis of specific population characteristics. Still, this timetable of adverse outcomes may be helpful for healthcare practitioners and planners. Prevention of drug resistance in the very first year of treatment is important to lower long-term mortality, especially in resource-limited settings in which second-line therapies are limited. It remains a high research priority to optimize the timing of a switch to second or even third-line treatment regimens in the setting of limited resources.

Back to Top | Article Outline


We appreciate the contribution of all persons participating in this study. We thank the staff from provincial and county CDCs for sample collection and assistance. We thank Drs Xihong Lin, Peter Gilbert and Haiqun Lin for statistical suggestions. This work was supported by grants from the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2012ZX10001-002), National natural Science Foundation in China (81101281), and Chinese State Key Laboratory for Infectious Disease Develop Grant (2011SKLID102), and the Canadian International Development Research Centre (104519-010).

S.Y., X.H., R.Y., L.L. conceived and designed the study; S.B., W.Z., R.Y., W.X., L.Z., L.Y., Y.S. and Z.Q. did the field investigation, data collection and experiment performance; L.L., X.H., S.B., W.Z., R.Y., C.R., V.S. and S.Y. did the data analysis and interpretation; and L.L., C.R., V.S. and S.Y. did the manuscript composing; all authors reviewed and approved the final version.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Conflicts of interest

All authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Back to Top | Article Outline


1. Palella FJ Jr, Delaney KM, Moorman AC, Loveless MO, Fuhrer J, Satten GA, et al. Declining morbidity and mortality among patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus infection. HIV Outpatient Study Investigators. N Engl J Med 1998; 338:853–860.

2. Greco DB, Simao M. Brazilian policy of universal access to AIDS treatment: sustainability challenges and perspectives. AIDS 2007; 21 (Suppl 4):S37–S45.

3. Achmat Z, Simcock J. Combining prevention, treatment and care: lessons from South Africa. AIDS 2007; 21 (Suppl 4):S11–S20.

4. WHO. Treating 3 million by 2005: making it happen. 2005. [Accessed 3 January 2013].

5. Gupta RK, Jordan MR, Sultan BJ, Hill A, Davis DH, Gregson J, et al. Global trends in antiretroviral resistance in treatment-naive individuals with HIV after rollout of antiretroviral treatment in resource-limited settings: a global collaborative study and meta-regression analysis. Lancet 2012; 380:1250–1258.

6. Hamers RL, Sigaloff KC, Wensing AM, Wallis CL, Kityo C, Siwale M, et al. Patterns of HIV-1 drug resistance after first-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) failure in 6 sub-Saharan African countries: implications for second-line ART strategies. Clin Infect Dis 2012; 54:1660–1669.

7. Virology Group DART, Trial Team. Virological response to a triple nucleoside/nucleotide analogue regimen over 48 weeks in HIV-1-infected adults in Africa. AIDS 2006; 20:1391–1399.

8. Zhang F, Dou Z, Ma Y, Zhao Y, Liu Z, Bulterys M, et al. Five-year outcomes of the China National Free Antiretroviral Treatment Program. Ann Intern Med 2009; 151:241–251.

9. Qian HZ, Vermund SH, Kaslow RA, Coffey CS, Chamot E, Yang Z, et al. Co-infection with HIV and hepatitis C virus in former plasma/blood donors: challenge for patient care in rural China. AIDS 2006; 20:1429–1435.

10. Liao L, Xing H, Li X, Ruan Y, Zhang Y, Qin G, et al. Genotypic analysis of the protease and reverse transcriptase of HIV type 1 isolates from recently infected injecting drug users in western China. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 2007; 23:1062–1065.

11. Liu TF, Shafer RW. Web resources for HIV type 1 genotypic-resistance test interpretation. Clin Infect Dis 2006; 42:1608–1618.

12. Liao L, Xing H, Shang H, Li J, Zhong P, Kang L, et al. The prevalence of transmitted antiretroviral drug resistance in treatment-naive HIV-infected individuals in China. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2010; 53 (Suppl 1):S10–S14.

13. WHO. Antiretroviral therapy for HIV infection in adults and adolescents: recommendations for a public health approach. 2010. [Accessed 3 January 2013].

14. Cozzi-Lepri A, Phillips AN, Ruiz L, Clotet B, Loveday C, Kjaer J, et al. Evolution of drug resistance in HIV-infected patients remaining on a virologically failing combination antiretroviral therapy regimen. AIDS 2007; 21:721–732.

15. Agwu A, Lindsey JC, Ferguson K, Zhang H, Spector S, Rudy BJ, et al. Analyses of HIV-1 drug-resistance profiles among infected adolescents experiencing delayed antiretroviral treatment switch after initial nonsuppressive highly active antiretroviral therapy. AIDS Patient Care STDS 2008; 22:545–552.

16. Gupta RK, Hill A, Sawyer AW, Cozzi-Lepri A, von Wyl V, Yerly S, et al. Virological monitoring and resistance to first-line highly active antiretroviral therapy in adults infected with HIV-1 treated under WHO guidelines: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 2009; 9:409–417.

17. Petersen ML, van der Laan MJ, Napravnik S, Eron JJ, Moore RD, Deeks SG. Long-term consequences of the delay between virologic failure of highly active antiretroviral therapy and regimen modification. AIDS 2008; 22:2097–2106.

18. Emmett SD, Cunningham CK, Mmbaga BT, Kinabo GD, Schimana W, Swai ME, et al. Predicting virologic failure among HIV-1-infected children receiving antiretroviral therapy in Tanzania: a cross-sectional study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2010; 54:368–375.

19. Ledergerber B, Lundgren JD, Walker AS, Sabin C, Justice A, Reiss P, et al. Predictors of trend in CD4-positive T-cell count and mortality among HIV-1-infected individuals with virological failure to all three antiretroviral-drug classes. Lancet 2004; 364:51–62.

20. Tuboi SH, Pacheco AG, Harrison LH, Stone RA, May M, Brinkhof MW, et al. Mortality associated with discordant responses to antiretroviral therapy in resource-constrained settings. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2010; 53:70–77.

21. Hogg RS, Bangsberg DR, Lima VD, Alexander C, Bonner S, Yip B, et al. Emergence of drug resistance is associated with an increased risk of death among patients first starting HAART. PLoS Med 2006; 3:e356.

22. Kumarasamy N, Madhavan V, Venkatesh KK, Saravanan S, Kantor R, Balakrishnan P, et al. High frequency of clinically significant mutations after first-line generic highly active antiretroviral therapy failure: implications for second-line options in resource-limited settings. Clin Infect Dis 2009; 49:306–309.

23. Gardner EM, Burman WJ, Steiner JF, Anderson PL, Bangsberg DR. Antiretroviral medication adherence and the development of class-specific antiretroviral resistance. AIDS 2009; 23:1035–1046.

24. Korn K, Reil H, Walter H, Schmidt B. Quality control trial for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 drug resistance testing using clinical samples reveals problems with detecting minority species and interpretation of test results. J Clin Microbiol 2003; 41:3559–3565.

25. Ferradini L, Jeannin A, Pinoges L, Izopet J, Odhiambo D, Mankhambo L, et al. Scaling up of highly active antiretroviral therapy in a rural district of Malawi: an effectiveness assessment. Lancet 2006; 367:1335–1342.

26. Kouanfack C, Montavon C, Laurent C, Aghokeng A, Kenfack A, Bourgeois A, et al. Low levels of antiretroviral-resistant HIV infection in a routine clinic in Cameroon that uses the World Health Organization (WHO) public health approach to monitor antiretroviral treatment and adequacy with the WHO recommendation for second-line treatment. Clin Infect Dis 2009; 48:1318–1322.

27. Bangsberg DR. Preventing HIV antiretroviral resistance through better monitoring of treatment adherence. J Infect Dis 2008; 197 (Suppl 3):S272–S278.

28. Ma Y, Zhang F, Li H, Wu H, Zhang J, Ding Y, et al. Monitoring HIV drug resistance using early warning indicators in China: results from a pilot survey conducted in 2008. Clin Infect Dis 2012; 54 (Suppl 4):S300–S302.

29. Li T, Dai Y, Kuang J, Jiang J, Han Y, Qiu Z, et al. Three generic nevirapine-based antiretroviral treatments in Chinese HIV/AIDS patients: multicentric observation cohort. PLoS One 2008; 3:e3918.

30. Zhang F, Dou Z, Ma Y, Zhang Y, Zhao Y, Zhao D, et al. Effect of earlier initiation of antiretroviral treatment and increased treatment coverage on HIV-related mortality in China: a national observational cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis 2011; 11:516–524.

31. Cozzi-Lepri A, Phillips AN, Clotet B, Mocroft A, Ruiz L, Kirk O, et al. Detection of HIV drug resistance during antiretroviral treatment and clinical progression in a large European cohort study. AIDS 2008; 22:2187–2198.

32. Martinez-Picado J, Martinez MA. HIV-1 reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance mutations and fitness: a view from the clinic and ex vivo. Virus Res 2008; 134:104–123.

33. Maggiolo F, Airoldi M, Kleinloog HD, Callegaro A, Ravasio V, Arici C, et al. Effect of adherence to HAART on virologic outcome and on the selection of resistance-conferring mutations in NNRTI- or PI-treated patients. HIV Clin Trials 2007; 8:282–292.

34. Chang LW, Harris J, Humphreys E. Optimal monitoring strategies for guiding when to switch first-line antiretroviral therapy regimens for treatment failure in adults and adolescents living with HIV in low-resource settings. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; CD008494.

35. Grant P, Taylor J, Cain P, Short W, Gallant J, Farthing C, et al. Maintaining reduced viral fitness and CD4 response in HIV-infected patients with viremia receiving a boosted protease inhibitor. Clin Infect Dis 2009; 48:680–682.

36. Paredes R, Sagar M, Marconi VC, Hoh R, Martin JN, Parkin NT, et al. In vivo fitness cost of the M184V mutation in multidrug-resistant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 in the absence of lamivudine. J Virol 2009; 83:2038–2043.

37. Harries AD, Zachariah R, van Oosterhout JJ, Reid SD, Hosseinipour MC, Arendt V, et al. Diagnosis and management of antiretroviral-therapy failure in resource-limited settings in sub-Saharan Africa: challenges and perspectives. Lancet Infect Dis 2010; 10:60–65.

38. Li Z, He X, Wang Z, Xing H, Li F, Yang Y, et al. Tracing the origin and history of HIV-1 subtype B’ epidemic by near full-length genome analyses. AIDS 2012; 26:877–884.


antiretroviral therapy; China; cohort; drug resistance; immunologic failure; mortality; virologic failure

Supplemental Digital Content

Back to Top | Article Outline

© 2013 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.


Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.