aGertrude H. Sergievsky Center, College of Physicians and Surgeons
bDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York
cDivision of Global HIV/AIDS (DGHA), Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia, USA
dCDC Global AIDS Program, China Office, Beijing, China.
Correspondence to Louise Kuhn, PhD, Sergievsky Center, Columbia University, 630 W. 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA. Tel: +1 212 305 2398; fax: +1 212 305 2426; e-mail: email@example.com
Received 14 February, 2012
Accepted 7 March, 2012
Transmission of HIV from mother to child can be almost eliminated by antiretroviral drugs started early in pregnancy [1,2]. If HIV disease in a pregnant woman is more advanced (i.e., CD4 cell count below 350 cells/μl), then antiretroviral drugs are given as treatment for the woman herself with the additional benefit that transmission to the child is prevented. If HIV disease in a pregnant woman is less advanced, then combination antiretroviral regimens can be provided during pregnancy and lactation as prophylaxis. There is also gathering support for implementing universal test-and-treat strategies during pregnancy as a public health approach to preventing vertical transmission and optimizing coverage of treatment for women who need it [3–5]. Tenofovirdisoproxilfumarate (TDF) is an attractive drug to recommend as part of first-line antiretroviral drug treatment regimens because of its generally favorable safety profile, excellent durability, and high efficacy [6,7]. It is also available in the United States and many other countries as part of fixed-dose combinations. Thus, determining whether or not there are untoward side effects of intrauterine exposure is of great public health importance.
There is another reason why the safety of intrauterine TDF exposure needs careful consideration. Oral TDF combined with emtricitabine used preexposure and postexposure (PrEP) has now been shown in three independent studies to be significantly associated with reduced risk of HIV acquisition among adult men and women [8–10]. In settings, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa, with high HIV incidence, PrEP has the potential to make sizable gains in terms of adult HIV infections prevented . The young, at-risk, but still uninfected, women most in need of antiretroviral prophylaxis against sexual HIV transmission are also those most likely to become pregnant. Thus, not only will infants born to HIV-infected women potentially be exposed to TDF, but infants born to uninfected women may also be exposed in the future, with the optimistic scenario that these prevention programs are able to gather momentum. Vaginal gel formulations of TDF have produced promising  but some inconsistent results and have not yet garnered support for implementation without further studies. Vaginal gel formulations are attractive, from the potential toxicity point of view, as systemic drug concentrations are considerably lower .
Guidelines in the United States have generally advised caution in the use of TDF during pregnancy for HIV-infected women based on findings from treatment studies that have implicated TDF in declining bone health in HIV-infected adults and children . HIV infection itself appears to have adverse effects on bone health, and is a consequence not corrected by antiretroviral therapy, rather it may be exacerbated if regimens include TDF . Studies in pregnant rhesus macaques have found adverse effects of high-dose TDF given during pregnancy on intrauterine growth measured at birth, but growth restriction is not observed at lower doses more consistent with the doses used in human pregnancies [16–18].
The findings reported in this issue by Siberry et al. from the multisite, US-based Pediatric HIV/AIDS Cohort Study (PHACS) are reassuring about the safety of TDF used during pregnancy. Among over 2000 births to HIV-infected women all of whom received combination antiretroviral therapy during pregnancy, those uninfected infants whose mothers received TDF as part of their regimen (median duration 4.8 months) were at no greater risk of low birth weight, low birth length, small head circumference, or reduced weight for gestational age than those not exposed to TDF. Remarkably, TDF use more than doubled in the last 5 years in this US-based cohort and 43% of pregnant HIV-infected women in 2010 were treated using a TDF-based combination regimen.
PHACS also reported a small but statistically significant association between TDF use and lower length-for-age z-scores at 1 year of age among uninfected infants. This finding raises the question of whether there may be adverse effects of intrauterine TDF exposure that are not detectable at birth but which become detectable later. This is a concerning possibility as the mechanisms by which TDF may exert influence on bone health, especially on the developing fetus, are unknown. Studies of nutritional insults during pregnancy in animal models, have found adverse consequences for bone development of the fetus . However, it should be noted that in these animal studies, including those directly examining TDF effects, consequences are detectable at birth. But the results from PHACS challenge our complacency about what safety parameters need to be assessed for antiretroviral drugs utilized during pregnancy. It is important that early markers of bone health be directly evaluated in newborns. This has only been done in one small study, with reassuring results about TDF safety [21,22].
Establishing the safety of drugs used during pregnancy for the unborn child is a methodological challenge. Randomized trials are generally unhelpful and reliance on observational epidemiologic studies is critical. There are serious weaknesses with the data presented from the PHACS: notably, less than a third of the study participants had data that could be included in the 1 year analysis – the risk of selection bias is quite severe with such sizable rates of attrition/exclusion. Measurement of potential confounders was also rather limited. The size of the difference between the TDF-exposed and unexposed (∼0.10 z-score) is small and does not remain significant after adjustment for multiple comparisons (although the authors argue that adjustment is not necessary in this circumstance). Nevertheless, replication of this unexpected finding is essential before clinical advice should be influenced.
Antiretroviral drugs used during pregnancy and lactation have the capacity to prevent most HIV infections in infants and young children. But several of the drugs in current use may have untoward consequences for exposed infants. For example, mitochondrial toxicity is associated with zidovudine use, particularly in combination with lamivudine . Efavirenz use in the first trimester of pregnancy is contraindicated due to animal data and case reports indicating a potential association with neural tube defects; nevertheless, in a recent meta-analysis, no increased relative risk of birth defects was noted among infants whose mothers received anefavirenz-based regimen . Common manifestations of intrauterine antiretroviral drug exposures have uncertain clinical relevance, and the more serious side effects seem to be rare justifying continued, unequivocal support for programs utilizing these drugs to prevent mother-to-child HIV transmission. But prudent choice between the available agents based on toxicity profiles is advisable .
Some special populations, for example hepatitis B virus (HBV) and HIV co-infected pregnant women, could particularly benefit from antiretroviral drug regimens including both TDF and lamivudine (or emtricitabine) . Even with appropriate vaccination of infants against HBV and use of hepatitis B immune globulin, 5–15% of infants of hepatitis B surface antigen-positive women become HBV-infected, and this proportion may be higher among HIV co-infected pregnant women. This is particularly important in south-east Asia and other countries with high dual HBV and HIV infection rates among pregnant women [26,27]. Shorter peripartum regimens including TDF have been shown to be highly effective in preventing development of drug resistance to nevirapine . Given the largely favorable results with TDF in extended regimens during pregnancy seen in PHACS , these short postpartum regimens are also likely to have a favorable risk–benefit profile, but this requires evaluation.
The results from PHACS are generally reassuring about the safety of TDF use during pregnancy but remind us of the importance of vigilance. Active and passive surveillance, such as the Antiretroviral Pregnancy Registry, as well as targeted research are necessary to understand the possible effects of antiretroviral drugs used during pregnancy on the infant . Better understanding of the effects of the different antiretroviral agents may facilitate development of adjunctive interventions, for example vitamin D supplementation [30,31], to minimize potential adverse outcomes in the HIV-exposed infants who have been saved from HIV infection. Programs to expand access to and improve coverage of antiretroviral drugs for treatment and prevention remain a critical public health priority.
We thank Drs Denise Jamieson, Jonathan Kaplan, Athena Kourtis, and R.J. Simonds for thoughtful review and comments.
Conflicts of interest
The conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
1. Shapiro RL, Hughes MD, Ogwu A, Kitch D, Lockman S, Moffat C, et al. Antiretroviral regimens in pregnancy and breast-feeding in Botswana. N Engl J Med 2010; 362:2282–2294.
2. Kesho Bora Study Group. Triple antiretroviral compared with zidovudine and single-dose nevirapine prophylaxis during pregnancy and breastfeeding for prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1 (Kesho Bora study): a randomised controlled trial.Lancet Infect Dis 2011; 11:171–180.
3. Schouten EJ, Jahn A, Midiani D, Makombe SD, Mnthambala A, Chirwa Z, et al. Prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV and the health-related Millennium Development Goals: time for a public health approach. Lancet 2011; 378:282–284.
4. Becquet R, Ekouevi DK, Arrive E, Stringer JS, Meda N, Chaix ML, et al. Universal antiretroviral therapy for pregnant and breast-feeding HIV-1-infected women: towards the elimination of mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1 in resource-limited settings. Clin Infect Dis 2009; 49:1936–1945.
5. Bulterys M, Wilfert C. HAART during pregnancy and during breastfeeding among HIV-infected women in the developing world: has the time come?. AIDS 2009; 23:2473–2477.
7. Gallant JE, DeJesus E, Arribas JR, Pozniak AL, Gazzard B, Campo RE, et al. Tenofovir DF, emtricitabine, and efavirenz vs. zidovudine, lamivudine, and efavirenz for HIV. N Engl J Med 2006; 354:251–260.
8. Grant RM, Lama JR, Anderson PL, McMahan V, Liu AY, Vargas L, et al. Preexposure chemoprophylaxis for HIV prevention in men who have sex with men. N Engl J Med 2010; 363:2587–2599.
9. Baeten J, Celum C; the Partners in PrEP Study. Antiretroviral preexposure prophylaxis for HIV-1 prevention among heterosexual African men and women. In: Proceedings of the 6th International AIDS Society Conference; 17–20 July 2011; Rome, Italy (abstract #MOAX0106).
10. Thigpen M, Kebaabetswe P, Smith D, Segolodi T, Soud F, Chillag K, et al.Daily oral antiretroviral use for prevention of HIV infection in heterosexually active young adults in Botswana: Results from the TDF2 study. In: Proceedings of the 6th International AIDS Society Conference; 17–20 July 2011; Rome, Italy (abstract #WELBC01).
11. Williams BG, Abdool Karim SS, Karim QA, Gouws E. Epidemiological impact of tenofovir gel on the HIV epidemic in South Africa. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2011; 58:207–210.
12. Abdool Karim Q, Abdool Karim SS, Frohlich JA, Grobler AC, Baxter C, Mansoor LE, et al. Effectiveness and safety of tenofovir gel, an antiretroviral microbicide, for the prevention of HIV infection in women. Science 2010; 329:1168–1174.
13. Karim SS, Kashuba AD, Werner L, Karim QA. Drug concentrations after topical and oral antiretroviral preexposure prophylaxis: implications for HIV prevention in women. Lancet 2011; 378:279–281.
14. Panel on Treatment of HIV-infected Pregnant Women and Prevention of Perinatal Transmission. Recommendations for use of antiretroviral drugs in pregnant HIV-1 infected women for maternal health and interventions to reduce perinatal HIV transmission in the United States – 14 September 2011. Available at http://www.aidsinfo.nih.gov/ContentFiles/PerinatalGL.pdf
. 2011. (Accessed 31 January 2012)
15. Cotter AG, Powderly WG. Endocrine complications of human immunodeficiency virus infection: hypogonadism, bone disease and tenofovir-related toxicity. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 2011; 25:501–515.
16. Tarantal AF, Castillo A, Ekert JE, Bischofberger N, Martin RB. Fetal and maternal outcome after administration of tenofovir to gravid rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2002; 29:207–220.
17. Van Rompay KK, Brignolo LL, Meyer DJ, Jerome C, Tarara R, Spinner A, et al. Biological effects of short-term or prolonged administration of 9-[2-(phosphonomethoxy)propyl]adenine (tenofovir) to newborn and infant rhesus macaques. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2004; 48:1469–1487.
18. Van Rompay KK, Durand-Gasselin L, Brignolo LL, Ray AS, Abel K, Cihlar T, et al. Chronic administration of tenofovir to rhesus macaques from infancy through adulthood and pregnancy: summary of pharmacokinetics and biological and virological effects. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2008; 52:3144–3160.
19. Siberry GK, Williams PL, Mendez H, Seage GR, Jacobson DL, Hazra R, et al.Safety of tenofovir use during pregnancy: early growth outcomes in HIV-exposed uninfected infants.AIDS 2012; 26:1151–1159.
20. Lanham SA, Bertram C, Cooper C, Oreffo RO. Animal models of maternal nutrition and altered offspring bone structure--bone development across the lifecourse. Eur Cell Mater 2011; 22:321–332.
21. Vigano A, Mora S, Giacomet V, Stucchi S, Manfredini V, Gabiano C, et al. In utero exposure to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate does not impair growth and bone health in HIV-uninfected children born to HIV-infected mothers. Antivir Ther 2011; 16:1259–1266.
22. Mora S, Giacomet V, Vigano A, Cafarelli L, Stucchi S, Pivetti V, et al. Exposure to antiretroviral agents during pregnancy does not alter bone status in infants. Bone 2012; 50:255–258.
23. Poirier MC, Divi RL, Al-Harthi L, Olivero OA, Nguyen V, Walker B, et al. Long-term mitochondrial toxicity in HIV-uninfected infants born to HIV-infected mothers. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2003; 33:175–183.
24. Ford N, Calmy A, Mofenson L. Safety of efavirenz in the first trimester of pregnancy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. AIDS 2011; 25:2301–2304.
25. Foster C, Lyall H, Olmscheid B, Pearce G, Zhang S, Gibb DM. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in pregnancy and prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1: is it time to move on from zidovudine?. HIV Med 2009; 10:397–406.
26. Liaw YF, Chu CM. Hepatitis B virus infection. Lancet 2009; 373:582–592.
27. Thio CL. Hepatitis B and human immunodeficiency virus coinfection. Hepatology 2009; 49:S138–145.
28. Chi BH, Sinkala M, Mbewe F, Cantrell RA, Kruse G, Chintu N, et al. Single-dose tenofovir and emtricitabine for reduction of viral resistance to nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor drugs in women given intrapartum nevirapine for perinatal HIV prevention: an open-label randomised trial. Lancet 2007; 370:1698–1705.
29. Watts DH. Teratogenicity risk of antiretroviral therapy in pregnancy. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep 2007; 4:135–140.
30. Spector SA. Vitamin D earns more than a passing grade. J Infect Dis 2009; 200:1015–1017.
31. Childs K, Welz T, Samarawickrama A, Post FA. Effects of vitamin D deficiency and combination antiretroviral therapy on bone in HIV-positive patients. AIDS 2012; 26:253–262.
© 2012 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.