Drug interactions between voriconazole, darunavir/ritonavir and etravirine in an HIV-infected patient with Aspergillus pneumonia
Aouri, Manela; Decosterd, Laurent A.a; Buclin, Thierrya; Hirschel, Bernardb; Calmy, Alexandrab; Livio, Françoisea
aDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital Center, University of Lausanne, Lausanne
bHIV Unit, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.
Correspondence to Laurent A. Decosterd, PhD, Laboratory of Innovation and Development, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital Lausanne, BH18-218, Service of Biomedicine, University Hospital Center CHUV, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland. E-mail: Laurentarthur.Decosterd@chuv.ch
Received 23 January, 2012
Accepted 30 January, 2012
We read with great interest the drug interaction report published by Toy et al.. In this report, an HIV-infected patient treated with ritonavir (RTV)-boosted darunavir (DRV) (DRV/RTV, 900/100 mg daily) and etravirine (ETV, 200 mg twice daily) was found to have an unexpectedly low trough DRV plasma concentration (0.54 mg/l) and an undetectable RTV concentration while on voriconazole 400 mg twice daily for Aspergillus pneumonia. After stopping voriconazole, trough DRV and RTV concentrations raised up to expected values (2.3 and 0.04 mg/l, respectively). ETV trough concentration increased by 134% on voriconazole. The authors postulate that the increased ETV concentration led to a greater induction effect on DRV, or that low RTV concentration resulted in reduced DRV boosting. The reason for undetectable RTV concentration was, however, not discussed.
As the authors called for more detailed characterization of this complex multiway drug interaction, we would like to present the case of a 52-year-old HIV-infected multiresistant patient (CD4 cell count 6 cells/μl, 1%; viral load 35 000 copies/ml) initiating a new treatment including the following drugs: DRV/RTV 800/100 mg daily, ETV 400 mg daily, elvitegravir 150 mg daily, tenofovir 300 mg daily, emtricitabine 200 mg daily and foscarnet 5 g daily five times a week. This patient was cotreated with voriconazole 200 mg twice daily for Candida albicans infection, which was then increased to a dosage of 400 mg in the morning and 200 mg in the evening. DRV dosage was increased to 1200 mg daily at the end of voriconazole therapy, to compensate for the anticipated lifting of voriconazole-mediated cytochrome P450 3A4 metabolism inhibition. Plasma concentrations of DRV, RTV, ETV, elvitegravir, voriconazole and its metabolite (voriconazole N-oxide) were measured by multiplex liquid chromatography coupled to triple quadripole tandem mass spectrometry assay (M. Aouri et al., in preparation) [2,3], at several occasions while on and off voriconazole therapy. Trough plasma concentrations, extrapolated from the mid-interval concentrations (average sampling time 12 ± 1 h after drug intake) using percentiles curves established in our center and published data, are shown in Table 1 (M. Arab-Alameddine et al., in preparation) . DRV plasma concentrations measured at three occasions while on voriconazole therapy were lying within the 50–75th percentile range established for DRV 800 mg daily. It remained within the same range after voriconazole interruption and DRV dosage increase. RTV plasma concentrations remained above 0.025 mg/l during voriconazole treatment, sufficiently high to guarantee the efficient boosting of DRV as well as elvitegravir, whose concentrations reached the previously reported range for RTV-boosted elvitegravir combination . ETV concentrations were not found to be much affected by voriconazole. Under 600 mg total daily dose, voriconazole trough plasma concentrations were within therapeutic range except on week 25, with unremarkable voriconazole N-oxide concentrations indicating no evidence of impaired hepatic metabolism. Voriconazole treatment was stopped at week 25, as his esophageal candidiasis resolved upon immune reconstitution. Forty-eight weeks after antiretroviral treatment initiation, the patient had and increased CD4 cell count (123 cells/μl, 8%) and viral load (80 copies/ml).
Our observations contrast, therefore, significantly with those reported by Toy et al.. Unlike their patient, ours had RTV and DRV plasma concentrations measured at multiple occasions while on voriconazole therapy, which strengthens our observations. In their patient, it is unclear why RTV was below the – unstated – limit of quantification of their assay during voriconazole therapy. In healthy volunteers, RTV (100 mg twice daily) area under the curve (AUC)0–12 only decreased by 14% when co-administered with voriconazole 200 mg twice daily [6,7]. Thus, an undetectable RTV concentration due to voriconazole is not expected, even for a 400 mg twice daily voriconazole dosage. As a weak inducer, ETV is not expected either to significantly induce DRV metabolism. In healthy volunteers, DRV (DRV/RTV 600/100 mg twice daily) AUC0–12 rather increased by 15% when given with ETV 200 mg twice daily .
In conclusion, in our opinion, drug interactions per se are unlikely to explain the extremely low plasma concentrations of DRV observed under voriconazole in the patient of Toy et al.. Other reasons have to be incriminated, such as missed dose of RTV and/or DRV or diluted sample (e.g. multilumen catheter). Our observation is rather consistent with a 50% decrease in DRV clearance by voriconazole co-administration, expected to double DRV concentrations in the absence of dosage adjustment. This is also in line with the interaction studied with ketoconazole . No significant interference is expected from ETV and elvitegravir.
Drug interactions can be a major issue in HIV-infected patients. It is important, however, that unexpected pharmacokinetic findings gathered during patient management are carefully confirmed (i.e. by multiple concentration measurements) before being considered valid and integrated into patients standard of care.
Conflicts of interest
This report has been realized within the frame of a research project on clinical pharmacology and pharmacogenetics of antiretrovirals (SNF grant no. 324730-124943/1 to L.A.D.) supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (Switzerland).
There are no conflicts of interest.
1. Toy J, Giguère P, Kravcik S, la Porte CJL. Drug interactions between voriconazole, darunavir/ritonavir and etravirine in an HIV-infected patient with Aspergillus pneumonia
2. Decosterd LA, Rochat B, Pesse B, Mercier T, Tissot F, Widmer N, et al. Multiplex ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for simultaneous quantification in human plasma of fluconazole, itraconazole, hydroxyitraconazole, posaconazole, voriconazole, voriconazole N-oxide, anidulafungin and caspofungin
. Antimicrob Agents Chemother
3. Fayet A, Beguin A, Zanolari B, Cruchon S, Guignard N, Telenti A, et al. A LC-tandem MS assay for the simultaneous measurement of new antiretroviral agents: raltegravir, maraviroc, darunavir and etravirine
. J Chromatograph B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci
4. Mathias AA, West S, Hui J, Kearney BP. Dose-response of ritonavir on hepatic CYP3A activity and elvitegravir oral exposure
. Clin Pharmacol Ther
5. Ramanathan S, Mathias AA, German P, Kearney BP. Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic profile of the HIV integrase inhibitor elvitegravir
. Clin Pharmacokinet
6. Liu P, Foster G, Gandelman K, LaBadie RR, Allison MJ, Gutierrez MJ, et al. Steady-state pharmacokinetic and safety profiles of voriconazole and ritonavir in healthy male subjects
. Antimicrob Agents Chemother
7. Yakiwchuk EM, Foisy MM, Hughes CA. Complexity of interactions between voriconazole and antiretroviral agents
. Ann Pharmacother
9. Sekar VJ, Lefebvre E, De Pauw M, Vangeneugden T, Hoetelmans RM. Pharmacokinetics of darunavir/ritonavir and ketoconazole following co-administration in HIV- healthy volunteers
. Br J Clin Pharmacol
This article has been cited 1 time(s).
Journal of Mass SpectrometryA validated assay by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry for the simultaneous quantification of elvitegravir and rilpivirine in HIV positive patientsJournal of Mass Spectrometry
© 2012 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
What does "Remember me" mean?
By checking this box, you'll stay logged in until you logout. You'll get easier access to your articles, collections,
media, and all your other content, even if you close your browser or shut down your
To protect your most sensitive data and activities (like changing your password),
we'll ask you to re-enter your password when you access these services.
What if I'm on a computer that I share with others?
If you're using a public computer or you share this computer with others, we recommend
that you uncheck the "Remember me" box.
Data is temporarily unavailable. Please try again soon.
Readers Of this Article Also Read