Serological immunity to adenovirus serotype 5 is not associated with risk of HIV infection: a case–control study
Curlin, Marcel Ea,b; Cassis-Ghavami, Faraha; Magaret, Amalia Sa,c; Spies, Gregory Aa; Duerr, Anna; Celum, Connie Lb,d,e; Sanchez, Jorge Lf; Margolick, Joseph Bg; Detels, Rogerh; McElrath, M Julianaa,b,e; Corey, Lawrencea,b,c
aVaccine and Infectious Diseases Institute, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, USA
bDepartment of Medicine, USA
cDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, USA
dDepartment of Epidemiology, USA
eDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
fAsociación Civil Impacta Salud y Educación, Lima, Peru
gDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
hSchool of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Received 11 August, 2010
Revised 18 October, 2010
Accepted 28 October, 2010
Correspondence to Marcel Curlin, MD, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, 1959 Pacific Street, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. Tel: +1 206 667 1677; fax: +1 206 667 6366; e-mail: email@example.com
Background: Adenoviruses are among the most promising vectors for the development of an HIV vaccine. The results of the phase IIB study of the adenovirus serotype 5-based Merck Trivalent HIV vaccine have raised the concern that serological immunity to adenovirus serotype 5 (Ad5) could be linked to HIV acquisition risk in high-risk individuals. We examined the association between adenovirus serostatus and the rate of incident HIV infection in populations at elevated risk of HIV acquisition.
Methods: We performed a nested case–control study of Ad5 serostatus among 299 HIV-infected and 590 matched HIV-uninfected persons participating in the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study (MACS) and in HPTN 039, a study of herpes simplex virus 2 suppression among adults in the United States, South America, and Africa. Appropriate HIV cases and controls were identified in each cohort, and Ad5-neutralizing antibody titers were compared in these two groups.
Results: In MACS and HPTN 039, the relative risks of incident HIV infection among Ad5-seropositive vs. Ad5-seronegative individuals were 1.1 (95% confidence interval 0.8–1.5, P = 0.57) and 1.0 (95% confidence interval 0.4–2.3, P = 0.99), respectively. HIV-1 acquisition rates did not vary significantly by Ad5-neutralizing antibody titer.
Conclusion: The presence of Ad5-neutralizing antibodies is not linked to the risk of HIV acquisition among populations at elevated risk of HIV infection.
In September of 2007, initial results of the phase IIB efficacy study of the MRK adenovirus type 5 (Ad5) HIV-1 gag/pol/nef vaccine, known as the Step study , suggested that uncircumcised men who entered the trial with serological evidence of prior infection with Ad5 had an increased risk of HIV-1 acquisition after receipt of the vaccine . Enhanced risk of HIV acquisition was not observed among vaccinees who were Ad5-seronegative at enrollment, nor was it associated with vaccine-induced Ad5-neutralizing antibodies (Ad5 nAbs) [3–5], which were seen in all vaccine recipients examined. Replication-defective recombinant adenoviral vaccine vectors hold promise for the development of vaccines against several human pathogens, including malaria , influenza , tuberculosis , and Ebola virus , and vectors based on Ad5, Ad26, and Ad35 are leading candidates in the search for an effective HIV vaccine [10,11]. The completely unexpected trend toward a greater number of HIV infections among Ad5-seropositive vaccinees observed in the Step study, therefore, raised a serious new concern about the role of preexisting antivector immune responses in modifying the risk of HIV acquisition that has been broadly felt within the vaccine research community [2,12–14].
Natural Ad5 infection is commonly acquired in childhood and is associated with a mild upper respiratory infection. Seroprevalence to Ad5 varies widely throughout the world, with about one-third of those in the United States and more than 80% of those in many areas of South America, Asia, and Africa possessing nAbs to the virus by mid adulthood [15–17]. The mechanism(s) underlying the apparent enhanced risk of HIV acquisition in Ad5-seropositive vaccinees observed in the Step study are unclear and continue to be debated [5,18,19]. One possible explanation is that past infection with Ad5 may be a biological marker for increased susceptibility to HIV infection. To test this hypothesis, we undertook a retrospective study of Ad5 seroprevalence and HIV incidence in two cohorts: the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study (MACS), an observational study of US MSM, and HPTN 039, a study of herpes simplex virus 2 (HSV-2) suppression among men and women in the United States, South America, and Africa. Selection of these cohorts allowed us to examine the association between Ad5 serology and HIV incidence among a diverse group of MSM and heterosexual women who had a risk of acquiring HIV infection comparable to that of Step study participants.
This study was performed with informed consent and approved by the Ethics Committees overseeing the Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, the Asociación Civil Impacta Salud y Educación, Lima, Peru, and the MACS. To assess the relationship between serological immunity to Ad5 and HIV acquisition risk, we performed a nested case–control study of Ad5 serostatus among HIV-infected and matched HIV-uninfected persons (cases and controls, respectively). Controls were selected by matching on known risk factors for HIV acquisition in order to isolate the possible effect of Ad5 serostatus on susceptibility and to reduce potential confounding. After identification of cases and controls, we determined Ad5 serostatus (Ad5 nAb titer ≤18 vs. >18, the threshold used in post-hoc analyses of the Step study) from stored serum specimens obtained at or near the time of enrollment in the parent study. We then compared the prevalence of Ad5 nAbs among cases and controls.
The MACS was established in 1984 as a prospective study of the clinical course of HIV-1 infection in MSM in Baltimore, Chicago, Pittsburgh, and Los Angeles . MACS participants were screened for HIV infection at every 6-month visit. To date, 6973 men have been enrolled, including 2284 who were HIV-infected at enrollment and approximately 657 who acquired HIV infection after enrollment. HPTN 039 was an NIH-funded phase III, multisite, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of daily antiviral HSV-2 suppressive therapy for HIV prevention. The study enrolled 3277 HIV-seronegative, HSV-2-seropositive participants at high risk of HIV infection – women from Zambia, South Africa, and Zimbabwe, and MSM from Peru and the United States. HPTN 039 participants were screened for HIV infection at every 3-month visit. At study termination, 139 incident HIV infections had accrued, including 72 among women and 67 among men .
Selection of participants
Cases from the MACS cohort were obtained from the approximately 229 MACS participants who became HIV infected within 2.5 years of enrollment. Controls from this cohort were selected by matching on the following: elapsed time from enrollment in MACS to HIV acquisition (follow-up interval), self-reported lifetime number of anal sex partners, and age at enrollment (within 10 years; Table 1). Controls were required to have a negative HIV test after an elapsed time equivalent to the follow-up interval for their matched case and to have at least as many lifetime anal receptive sex partners as the case. When appropriate controls meeting this degree of stringency were not available, cases were matched to controls with no less than two fewer lifetime partners. Circumcision status was not available for all study participants, and therefore, matching was not performed on circumcision status. However, this factor was evaluated as a potential confounding factor (see results).
HPTN 039 cases were participants who acquired HIV infection between study enrollment and study completion at 18 months. Controls from this study were selected by matching on the following: country of residence, time from enrollment to HIV acquisition, sex, self-reported circumcision status (men), and self-reported number of sexual partners in the previous month (men). As 92% of women had only one lifetime partner and 99.9% had no more than two partners, the number of partners in the previous month was not used as a matching criterion for women.
Serological assay for adenovirus immunity
Ad5 nAb titers were determined by the HIV Vaccine Trials Network (HVTN) laboratory (FHCRC, Seattle, Washington, USA) using the methodology employed in the Step study . Neutralization activity was measured in blinded clinical samples using a recombinant Ad5 carrying a reporter gene for secreted alkaline phosphatase (SEAP). Equal volumes of virus and test serum were combined at serum dilutions ranging from 1: 18 to 1: 4608, plated alongside negative and positive serum controls, and incubated for 1 h. Neutralization reactions were added to HEK 293 cells seeded at 3 × 104 cells/well in 96-well plates. After 1 h, the infection mix was removed and the wells were re-fed with complete medium. One day after infection, 50 μl of media was used to determine the concentration of SEAP by measuring the chemiluminescent substrate (CSPD). The neutralization titer was defined as the serum dilution giving a 50% reduction of SEAP activity relative to SEAP activity from virus infection alone. Titers of 18 or less were considered negative. Sera from enrollment visits were tested in each cohort.
Because Ad5 seroprevalence varies geographically, we used Ad5 seroprevalence rates from several regions represented in the Step study to estimate the sample size needed for a sufficiently powered analysis. In the Step study, Ad5 seroprevalence was 43% in the United States (men), 49% in Canada (men), and 66–89% among men, and 73–100% among women residing in Brazil, the Dominican Republic, Haiti, Jamaica, Peru, and Puerto Rico. Based on assumed seroprevalence rates of 40–50% in the MACS cohort and 70–90% in HPTN 039, we determined that 214 MACS cases and 139 HPTN cases (and two controls per case) would yield at least 80% power to detect a 20% increase in the relative risk (RR) of Ad5 seropositivity associated with case status, corresponding to an absolute increase in Ad5 seropositivity of 8–12%. No substantial increase in power was obtained for either cohort by increasing the control to case ratio to 3, and therefore two controls were used for each case.
The rates of Ad5 seropositivity in cases and controls were compared within each cohort. Conditional logistic regression was performed to obtain the unadjusted odds ratio for HIV infection by Ad5 seropositivity (defined as an Ad5 nAb titer >18). As cases and controls were matched for known risk factors, adjusted analyses including these matching factors were not performed. For each cohort, the ratios of observed to expected cases within strata of Ad5 NAb titer (0.25 log increments) were calculated; observed to expected case ratios were plotted against Ad5 NAb titer to examine trends. Additional univariate and multivariate conditional logistic regressions were performed including self-reported circumcision status and CCR5Δ32 genotype in MACS participants. All analyses evaluating the relationship between Ad seroprevalence and HIV acquisition were performed at the University of Washington.
Cases and controls in both cohorts were demographically similar (Table 1). In MACS cohort, we obtained baseline Ad5 titers on 214 cases and 423 matched controls, who did not become infected during an equivalent observation period. Ad5 titers more than 18 were found in 246 persons near the time of acquisition or censoring. The rates of Ad5 seropositivity differed by no more than 2% between cases and controls (Table 1). The odds ratio for incident HIV infection among Ad5-seropositive vs. Ad5-seronegative individuals was 1.1, which was not statistically significant [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.8–1.5, P = 0.57].
Because participants from the MACS cohort were not matched on circumcision status, a factor associated with HIV acquisition in Step study vaccinees, we sought to evaluate the effect of circumcision on the relationship between Ad5 serostatus and risk of HIV infection. Circumcision status was available for 106 cases and 317 controls. Eighty-eight percent (93/106) of cases and 97% (306/317) of controls were circumcised (P = 0.001). Circumcision status was not associated with Ad5 serostatus; 42% (10/24) of uncircumcised men had detectable Ad5 nAb titers vs. 37% (148/399) of circumcised men (P = 0.63). These observations indicate that the lack of association between Ad5 and HIV acquisition is unlikely to be attributable to confounding or competing effects of circumcision and Ad5 exposure.
CCR5Δ32 deletion genotype information was available on 359 persons; 64 individuals were heterozygous for CCR5Δ32, including 41 Ad5 seronegative and 23 Ad5 seropositive individuals. Eight individuals were CCR5Δ32 homozygous, including three Ad5 seronegative and five Ad5 seropositive individuals. There was no significant association between Ad5 serostatus and presence of the CCR5Δ32 deletion, in either the heterozygous or homozygous state (RR = 0.87, P = 0.48 and RR = 1.52, P = 0.14, respectively). In separate adjusted conditional logistic regressions, including circumcision status and presence of either one or two copies of the CCR5Δ32 deletion, the odds of being a case in the MACS cohort were not associated with Ad5 detection (P = 0.14 and P = 0.45, respectively). When these analyses were repeated while excluding the eight individuals homozygous for the CCR5Δ32 deletion, again there was no association between HIV-1 case status and presence or absence of Ad5 nAb titers more than 18 (P = 0.45)
In HPTN 039 cohort, of 254 original participants, 252 participants were included in analysis. Two controls were excluded as there was not a valid titer for Ad5 in the corresponding case, and three cases only had one control with valid Ad5 serostatus. Thus, the analysis was performed with 85 cases and 167 controls (Table 1). The 31 cases and matching controls from Zambia were women, whereas the remaining participants were men. In this cohort, the odds ratio for incident HIV infection among Ad5-seropositive vs. Ad5-seronegative individuals was 1.0 (95% CI = 0.4–2.3, P = 0.99). Inclusion of circumcision status in the regression model for HPTN039 also did not alter the significance of Ad5 detection vs. the case status (OR = 1.0, 95% CI = 0.4–2.5, P = 0.99). Information on CCR5Δ32 genotype was not available in this cohort. In neither MACS nor HPTN039 was there an apparent relationship between Ad5 titer and HIV acquisition rate (Fig. 1).
An apparent association between Ad5 seropositivity and increased acquisition of HIV in the Step trial has raised the concern that Ad5 serological immunity could be a marker of enhanced susceptibility to HIV infection. Here, we present a nested case–control study of Ad5 serostatus and HIV acquisition risk in men and women at elevated risk of HIV infection, adjusted for potential confounders, including geographic region, circumcision status (among MSM), number of sexual partners, and CCR5Δ32 deletion genotype. Our study evaluates a significantly greater number of HIV acquisition cases than occurred in the Step study (299 cases vs. 84 cases at termination of Step study), and therefore provides a more powerful statistical analysis of the association between Ad5 seropositivity and HIV acquisition in the absence of vaccination.
We found no association between Ad5 nAb seropositivity and incidence of HIV infection, and this lack of association remained unaffected by circumcision status and CCR5Δ32 genotype among those in whom this information was available. In addition, no clear relationship between Ad5 titer and HIV acquisition rate was evident (Fig. 1), although this study was not specifically designed to stratify HIV acquisition risk by Ad5 titer. These results demonstrate that in two cohorts at elevated risk of HIV infection similar to that recruited to the Step study, Ad5-seropositive individuals were no more likely than Ad5-seronegative individuals to acquire HIV. Therefore, past adenovirus type 5 infection, as measured by presence of Ad5 nAbs, does not appear to be a marker of increased susceptibility to HIV infection in unvaccinated individuals.
In Step, the trend toward greater risk of HIV infection among individuals with Ad5 nAbs prior to vaccination did not reach statistical significance, and further analyses revealed that HIV acquisition among Step study participants who received the Ad5-vectored vaccine was more highly associated with lack of circumcision than with baseline Ad5 serostatus [23,24]. We note that the Step study was not powered to perform subgroup analyses, especially between circumcised and uncircumcised men. The present study does not exclude the possibility of an interaction between preexisting serological immunity to Ad5 and vaccination with Ad5-vectored vaccines in modifying the risk of HIV acquisition, which must be addressed in separate studies.
The present study was supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health (grants U01 AI052054 and AI30731), and by the HIV Prevention Trials Network (HPTN) under Cooperative Agreement U01 AI46749 sponsored by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institute of Drug Abuse, National Institute of Mental Health, and Office of AIDS Research. The MACS is funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, the National Cancer Institute, and the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute. UO1-AI-35042, 5-MO1-RR-00722 (GCRC), UO1-AI-35043, UO1-AI-37984, UO1-AI-35039, UO1-AI-35040, UO1-AI-37613, UO1-AI-35041. One author has received research funding support from GlaxoSmithKline. GlaxoSmithKline had no role in the conception, execution, interpretation, or decision to publish this study.
M.E.C. participated in the design of the study, interpretation of the data, and drafted the manuscript. F.C.-G. participated in the design of the study and drafting of the manuscript. A.S.M. performed the statistical analyses and assisted in drafting of the manuscript. G.A.S. carried out the antibody assays and assisted in drafting the manuscript. A.D. and J.L.S. participated in the design of the study, interpreting the data, and drafting the manuscript. C.L.C. coordinated study of the HPTN 039 cohort and assisted in interpreting the data and drafting the manuscript. J.B.M. and R.D. coordinated study of the MACS participants and assisted in drafting of the manuscript. M.J.M. assisted in interpreting the data and drafting the manuscript. L.C. conceived of the study and participated in its design and coordination and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
We thank Steward Reid for his assistance with regulatory matters, Rachel Tompa for editorial review of this manuscript, and Anya Luke-Killam for assistance with technical editing. We thank the site investigators and staff of HPTN 039 and MACS for their contributions to this ancillary study. We gratefully acknowledge the study participants from HPTN 039 and MACS, who made this study possible.
The raw data used in these analyses are available in supplementary table S1, http://links.lww.com/QAD/A102.
1. Buchbinder SP, Mehrotra DV, Duerr A, Fitzgerald DW, Mogg R, Li D, et al. Efficacy assessment of a cell-mediated immunity HIV-1 vaccine (the Step Study): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, test-of-concept trial. Lancet 2008; 372:1881–1893.
2. Robb ML. Failure of the Merck HIV vaccine: an uncertain step forward. Lancet 2008; 372:1857–1858.
3. McElrath MJ, De Rosa SC, Moodie Z, Dubey S, Kierstead L, Janes H, et al. HIV-1 vaccine-induced immunity in the test-of-concept Step Study: a case-cohort analysis. Lancet 2008; 372:1894–1905.
4. Uberla K. HIV vaccine development in the aftermath of the STEP study: re-focus on occult HIV infection? PLoS Pathog 2008; 4:e1000114.
5. Perreau M, Pantaleo G, Kremer EJ. Activation of a dendritic cell-T cell axis by Ad5 immune complexes creates an improved environment for replication of HIV in T cells. J Exp Med 2008; 205:2717–2725.
6. Rodriguez A, Goudsmit J, Companjen A, Mintardjo R, Gillissen G, Tax D, et al. Impact of recombinant adenovirus serotype 35 priming versus boosting of a Plasmodium falciparum protein: characterization of T- and B-cell responses to liver-stage antigen 1. Infect Immun 2008; 76:1709–1718.
7. Hoelscher MA, Garg S, Bangari DS, Belser JA, Lu X, Stephenson I, et al. Development of adenoviral-vector-based pandemic influenza vaccine against antigenically distinct human H5N1 strains in mice. Lancet 2006; 367:475–481.
8. Wang J, Thorson L, Stokes RW, Santosuosso M, Huygen K, Zganiacz A, et al. Single mucosal, but not parenteral, immunization with recombinant adenoviral-based vaccine provides potent protection from pulmonary tuberculosis. J Immunol 2004; 173:6357–6365.
9. Sullivan NJ, Sanchez A, Rollin PE, Yang ZY, Nabel GJ. Development of a preventive vaccine for Ebola virus infection in primates. Nature 2000; 408:605–609.
10. Diseases NIoAaI. Bulletin: HVTN 505 HIV vaccine study begins enrolling volunteers. NIAID news & events: news releases: NIAID; 2009 (news release).
11. Baden L, Dolin R, O'Brien K, Abbink P, La Porte A, Seaman M, et al. OA05-06 LB. First-in-human phase 1 safety and immunigenicity of an adenovirus serotype 26 HIV-1 vaccine vector. Retrovirology 2009; 6:O36.
12. Steinbrook R. One step forward, two steps back: will there ever be an AIDS vaccine? N Engl J Med 2007; 357:2653–2655.
13. Fauci AS, Johnston MI, Dieffenbach CW, Burton DR, Hammer SM, Hoxie JA, et al. HIV vaccine research: the way forward. Science 2008; 321:530–532.
14. Sekaly RP. The failed HIV Merck vaccine study: a step back or a launching point for future vaccine development? J Exp Med 2008; 205:7–12.
15. Vogels R, Zuijdgeest D, van Rijnsoever R, Hartkoorn E, Damen I, de Bethune MP, et al. Replication-deficient human adenovirus type 35 vectors for gene transfer and vaccination: efficient human cell infection and bypass of preexisting adenovirus immunity. J Virol 2003; 77:8263–8271.
16. Abbink P, Lemckert AA, Ewald BA, Lynch DM, Denholtz M, Smits S, et al. Comparative seroprevalence and immunogenicity of six rare serotype recombinant adenovirus vaccine vectors from subgroups B and D. J Virol 2007; 81:4654–4663.
17. Thorner AR, Vogels R, Kaspers J, Weverling GJ, Holterman L, Lemckert AA, et al. Age dependence of adenovirus-specific neutralizing antibody titers in individuals from sub-Saharan Africa. J Clin Microbiol 2006; 44:3781–3783.
18. O'Brien KL, Liu J, King SL, Sun YH, Schmitz JE, Lifton MA, et al. Adenovirus-specific immunity after immunization with an Ad5 HIV-1 vaccine candidate in humans. Nat Med 2009; 15:873–875.
19. Hutnick NA, Carnathan DG, Dubey SA, Makedonas G, Cox KS, Kierstead L, et al. Baseline Ad5 serostatus does not predict Ad5 HIV vaccine-induced expansion of adenovirus-specific CD4+ T cells. Nat Med 2009; 15:876–878.
20. Kaslow RA, Ostrow DG, Detels R, Phair JP, Polk BF, Rinaldo CR Jr. The Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study: rationale, organization, and selected characteristics of the participants. Am J Epidemiol 1987; 126:310–318.
21. Celum C, Wald A, Hughes J, Sanchez J, Reid S, Delany-Moretlwe S, et al. Effect of aciclovir on HIV-1 acquisition in herpes simplex virus 2 seropositive women and men who have sex with men: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2008; 371:2109–2119.
22. Aste-Amezaga M, Bett AJ, Wang F, Casimiro DR, Antonello JM, Patel DK, et al. Quantitative adenovirus neutralization assays based on the secreted alkaline phosphatase reporter gene: application in epidemiologic studies and in the design of adenovector vaccines. Hum Gene Ther 2004; 15:293–304.
23. Corey L, McElrath MJ, Kublin JG. Poststep modifications for research on HIV vaccines. AIDS 2009; 23:3–8.
24. Buchbinder S. Efficacy results from the Step Study (Merck V520 Protocol 023/HVTN 502): a phase II test-of-concept trial of the MRKAd5 HIV-1 Gag/Pol/Nef Trivalent Vaccine. 15th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections. Boston, MA: Hynes Convention Center; 2008.
This article has been cited 3 time(s).
Current Opinion in VirologyThe role of T cell immunity in HIV-1 infectionCurrent Opinion in Virology
Plos OneBroadly Protective Adenovirus-Based Multivalent Vaccines against Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Viruses for Pandemic PreparednessPlos One
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of AmericaMerck Ad5/HIV induces broad innate immune activation that predicts CD8(+) T-cell responses but is attenuated by preexisting Ad5 immunityProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
acquisition risk; adenovirus; HIV; MSM; serology; vaccine
Supplemental Digital Content
© 2011 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
Highlight selected keywords in the article text.