No selection of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance associated mutations by acyclovir suppressive therapy in herpes simplex virus-2/HIV-1 dually infected persons

LeGoff, Jeromea,b; Tanton, Clarec; Delaugerre, Constancea,b; Weiss, Helen Ad; Changalucha, Johne; Ross, David Ad; Mugeye, Kokugonzaf,g; Belec, Laurenth,i; Hayes, Richard Jd; Watson-Jones, Deborahd,e

doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32833e5176
Author Information

aLaboratoire de Microbiologie, Hôpital St Louis, APHP, France

bUniversité Paris 7 Denis Diderot, Paris, France

cCentre for Sexual Health and HIV Research, Research Department of Infection and Population Health, University College London, UK

dLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK

eNational Institute for Medical Research, Tanzania

fAfrican Medical and Research Foundation, Tanzania

gMunicipal Office of Health, Mwanza, Tanzania

hUniversité Paris Descartes, France

iAPHP, Hôpital HEGP, Laboratoire de Microbiologie, Paris, France.

Received 21 June, 2010

Accepted 15 July, 2010

Correspondence to Dr LeGoff Jerome, Laboratoire de Microbiologie Hôpital St Louis, 1 avenue Claude Vellefaux, Paris 75010, France. Tel: +33 142 499 484; fax: + 33 142 499 200; e-mail:

Article Outline

Genital herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) shedding has been associated with increased concentrations of HIV-1 in the genital tract and plasma [1,2]. Recent data from randomized controlled trials suggest that daily HSV-2 suppressive therapy with acyclovir (ACV) or valacyclovir over periods of up to 3 months may reduce plasma and genital HIV RNA load by 0.3–0.5 log10 copies/ml among HIV/HSV-2 coinfected individuals not receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART) [3–7]. However, a recent trial of suppressive therapy [ACV 400 mg twice daily (b.i.d.)] delivered to the HIV/HSV-2 seropositive partner in HIV discordant couples found no decrease in the rate of HIV transmission to the HIV negative partner [8].

ACV is an acyclic guanosine analog that inhibits HSV DNA polymerase after conversion to its triphosphate form. As the first phosphorylation is synthesized selectively by HSV thymidine kinase [9], ACV is mainly active in HSV-infected cells and was therefore thought to have no or poor antiretroviral activity. The postulated mechanism of impact on HIV is that herpes suppressive therapy is able to prevent HIV replication by disrupting direct HSV-2/HIV-1 interaction and, indirectly, by reducing the systemic and local immune activation induced by HSV-2 [10]. However, recent in-vitro experiments have suggested that ACV may directly inhibit HIV replication and induce the selection of mutations in the HIV reverse transcriptase known to confer resistance to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) [11,12]. ACV has been shown to select the mutation V75I, associated with the reverse transcriptase multidrug resistance complex, and also, to a lesser extent, T69N and M184I, which typically precedes the emergence of the M184V mutation that confers a high level of resistance to lamivudine/emtricitabine.

These results suggest that the use of ACV may select HIV variants harboring mutations associated with resistance to NRTI. If confirmed in vivo, this may impact the choice and efficacy of antiretroviral regimens among HIV patients who have previously been treated with ACV, and would suggest that the use of ACV in ART-naïve HIV-positive patients should be carefully considered.

To determine the impact of ACV suppressive therapy on the selection of mutations in the HIV reverse transcriptase gene in vivo, we analyzed plasma samples from dually HIV/HSV-2-infected women receiving ACV suppressive therapy who were enrolled in a randomized placebo-controlled trial of ACV 400 mg b.i.d. for HSV suppression in Tanzania [13,14]. The detection of mutations was performed by HIV reverse transcriptase gene sequence analysis on plasma samples selected from women with a reported high-ACV adherence (defined as taking >90% tablets by tablet counts) and HIV RNA load more than 3 log10 copies/ml after 12 months of ACV suppressive therapy, and who were not on ART.

Among 21 selected samples, none of the mutations V75I, T69N and M184I were detected. No other mutations known to confer resistance to NRTI were detected in the reverse transcriptase gene. In four samples, mutations at the codon 69 (69A n = 2, 69P n = 1, T69S n = 1) were detected. T69A and T69P are not known to be associated with NRTI resistance, but T69S in combination with other mutations may be associated with tenofovir resistance. This mutation may have been selected owing to ACV exposure or owing to natural polymorphism.

These results suggest that b.i.d. HSV-2 suppressive therapy with a standard dose of 400 mg of ACV for 12 months did not induce the selection of NRTI resistance mutations in HIV-infected women not receiving ART. Because the threshold of resistant variant detection with sequence analysis is above 20%, we cannot completely rule out the presence of minor populations containing NRTI resistance mutations. However, we selected samples from women with high-ACV adherence to guarantee the highest selective pressure of ACV, and restricted the laboratory analyses to those who had been on ACV therapy for 12 months in order to be able to detect late emergence of ACV-associated NRTI resistance mutations. Thus, the selection of mutations in the reverse transcriptase gene by ACV exposure seems unlikely in our population. Considering the bioavailability of oral ACV, plasma concentrations after 400 mg b.i.d. should not exceed 1 μmol/l, five-fold lower than the half maximal inhibitory concentration for HIV [12] and such concentrations might not be sufficient to achieve antiretroviral activity. Our results do not confirm the in-vitro data obtained studies using high-dose ACV [12], but corroborate results recently presented on patients receiving ACV or valacyclovir for periods of 8–24 months [15]. These reassuring results for the use of 400 mg b.i.d. ACV in HSV-2/HIV coinfected patients deserve further confirmation especially if higher dosage of ACV is used in HIV-infected individuals.

Back to Top | Article Outline


1. LeGoff J, Weiss HA, Gresenguet G, Nzambi K, Frost E, Hayes RJ, et al. Cervicovaginal HIV-1 and herpes simplex virus type 2 shedding during genital ulcer disease episodes. AIDS 2007; 21:1569–1578.
2. Baeten JM, McClelland RS, Corey L, Overbaugh J, Lavreys L, Richardson BA, et al. Vitamin A supplementation and genital shedding of herpes simplex virus among HIV-1-infected women: a randomized clinical trial. J Infect Dis 2004; 189:1466–1471.
3. Baeten JM, Strick LB, Lucchetti A, Whittington WL, Sanchez J, Coombs RW, et al. Herpes simplex virus (HSV)-suppressive therapy decreases plasma and genital HIV-1 levels in HSV-2/HIV-1 coinfected women: a randomized, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial. J Infect Dis 2008; 198:1804–1808.
4. Delany S, Mlaba N, Clayton T, Akpomiemie G, Capovilla A, Legoff J, et al. Impact of aciclovir on genital and plasma HIV-1 RNA in HSV-2/HIV-1 co-infected women: a randomized placebo-controlled trial in South Africa. AIDS 2009; 23:461–469.
5. Nagot N, Ouedraogo A, Foulongne V, Konate I, Weiss HA, Vergne L, et al. Reduction of HIV-1 RNA levels with therapy to suppress herpes simplex virus. N Engl J Med 2007; 356:790–799.
6. Ouedraogo A, Nagot N, Vergne L, Konate I, Weiss HA, Defer MC, et al. Impact of suppressive herpes therapy on genital HIV-1 RNA among women taking antiretroviral therapy: a randomized controlled trial. AIDS 2006; 20:2305–2313.
7. Zuckerman RA, Lucchetti A, Whittington WL, Sanchez J, Coombs RW, Magaret A, et al. HSV suppression reduces seminal HIV-1 levels in HIV-1/HSV-2 co-infected men who have sex with men. AIDS 2009; 23:479–483.
8. Celum C, Wald A, Lingappa JR, Magaret AS, Wang RS, Mugo N, et al. Acyclovir and transmission of HIV-1 from persons infected with HIV-1 and HSV-2. N Engl J Med 2010; 362:427–439.
9. Fyfe JA, Keller PM, Furman PA, Miller RL, Elion GB. Thymidine kinase from herpes simplex virus phosphorylates the new antiviral compound, 9-(2-hydroxyethoxymethyl)guanine. J Biol Chem 1978; 253:8721–8727.
10. Van de Perre P, Segondy M, Foulongne V, Ouedraogo A, Konate I, Huraux JM, et al. Herpes simplex virus and HIV-1: deciphering viral synergy. Lancet Infect Dis 2008; 8:490–497.
11. Lisco A, Vanpouille C, Tchesnokov EP, Grivel JC, Biancotto A, Brichacek B, et al. Acyclovir is activated into a HIV-1 reverse transcriptase inhibitor in herpesvirus-infected human tissues. Cell Host Microbe 2008; 4:260–270.
12. McMahon MA, Siliciano JD, Lai J, Liu JO, Stivers JT, Siliciano RF, Kohli RM. The antiherpetic drug acyclovir inhibits HIV replication and selects the V75I reverse transcriptase multidrug resistance mutation. J Biol Chem 2008; 283:31289–31293.
13. Tanton C, Weiss HA, Rusizoka M, Legoff J, Changalucha J, Baisley K, et al. Long-term impact of acyclovir suppressive therapy on genital and plasma HIV RNA in Tanzanian women: a randomized controlled trial. J Infect Dis 2010; 201:1285–1297.
14. Watson-Jones D, Weiss HA, Rusizoka M, Changalucha J, Baisley K, Mugeye K, et al. Effect of herpes simplex suppression on incidence of HIV among women in Tanzania. N Engl J Med 2008; 358:1560–1571.
15. Baeten J, Lingappa J, Corey L, Wald A, Beck I, Frenkel L, et al. Herpes simplex virus type 2 suppressive therapy with acyclovir or valacyclovir does not induce specific HIV-1 resistance in HSV-2/HIV-1 dually-infected persons. In: Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections San Francisco; 2010.
© 2010 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.