Skip Navigation LinksHome > January 2010 - Volume 24 - Issue 2 > Comparison of interferon gamma and interferon gamma-inducibl...
AIDS:
doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e328334895e
Research Letters

Comparison of interferon gamma and interferon gamma-inducible protein-10 secretion in HIV-tuberculosis patients.

Kabeer, Basirudeen SAa; Sikhamani, Rajasekaranb; Raja, Alamelua

Free Access
Article Outline
Collapse Box

Author Information

aDepartment of Immunology, Tuberculosis Research Centre (ICMR), India

bGovernment Hospital of Thoracic Medicine, Tambaram Sanatorium, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Received 5 August, 2009

Revised 14 October, 2009

Accepted 23 October, 2009

Collapse Box

Abstract

Interferon gamma (IFNγ)-based in-vitro assays have suboptimal sensitivity, especially in immunocompromised individuals, which emphasizes the need for alternative markers for tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis. We compared TB antigens-specific IFNγ and IFNγ-inducible protein-10 levels in culture of whole blood samples from HIV–TB patients. We report that IFNγ-inducible protein-10 detects a greater number of HIV–TB cases than IFNγ and suggest that IFNγ-inducible protein-10 may be a better alternative marker for latent TB infection diagnosis among immunocompromised individuals.

The accelerated progression of tuberculosis (TB) in HIV infection [1,2] and the higher risk of mortality [3,4] demands diagnostic tests that detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection and disease at an early stage. Recently developed T-cell-based interferon gamma (IFNγ) release assays (IGRAs) have shown promise in the diagnosis of latent TB infection (LTBI). These assays are also being evaluated for diagnosis of active disease. Unlike tuberculin skin test (TST), they are least affected by prior Bacillus Calmette–Guerin vaccination and environmental mycobacteria [5]. IGRAs are commercially available in two formats: QuantiFERON-TB Gold in-tube (QFT-IT; Cellestis Inc., Valencia, California, USA) and T-SPOT.TB (Oxford Immunotec, Oxford, UK). Although IGRAs perform better than TST in immunocompromised individuals, they have suboptimal sensitivity in those individuals [6–8]. Particularly, QFT-IT gives more indeterminate results (3–17%) than T.SPOT.TB due to the paucity of the source of IFNγ, namely the CD4+ T cells [9].

Recently, IFNγ-inducible protein-10 was suggested as a better diagnostic marker for TB infection [10–14]. A study [10] with very few individuals reported higher sensitivity of IFNγ-inducible protein-10 over IGRAs. Nonetheless, the utility of IFNγ-inducible protein-10 among HIV-infected individuals has not been evaluated so far. The present study compared the levels of IFNγ and IFNγ-inducible protein-10 in the culture of whole blood samples from HIV–TB patients.

A total of 50 newly diagnosed, smear-positive HIV–TB patients were recruited for this study. Six sputum samples were collected from each patient. Concentrated sputum samples were used for smear microscopy, and the smear-positive sputum samples were cultured in Lowenstein Jensen (Biomerieux Inc., Marcy I'Etoile, France) and also in liquid MP BacT medium (Biomerieux Inc.). Study participants' age ranged from 18 to 54 (median 38) years, and 72% of them were men. Forty-five individuals were HIV-1 positive and five were dually infected. Blood was drawn for CD3, CD4 and CD8 cell counts, QFT-IT and inducible protein-10 assays.

QFT-IT was carried out as per the manufacturer's instructions (Cellestis Ltd., Carnegie, Victoria, Australia), and the results were interpreted using the software supplied. IFNγ-inducible protein-10 levels were measured in the supernatants from QFT-IT tubes using BD Opt-EIA kits (BD Biosciences, San Jose, California, USA). Briefly, capture antibody (mouse antihuman inducible protein-10 mAb) in carbonate–bicarbonate buffer (pH 9.6) at the recommended concentration was coated in the 96-well polystyrene plates (NUNC MaxiSorp; NUNC AB, Roskilde, Denmark). After overnight incubation at 4°C, the excess antibodies were washed off using PBS, 0.1% Tween 20 (Himedia Laboratories, Mumbai, India). The samples were added and incubated for 2 h at 37°C room temperature (RT). After washing, secondary antibody (biotinylated antihuman inducible protein-10 mAb) conjugated with peroxidase was incubated for 1 h at RT. Excess antibodies were washed, and tetramethylbenzidine (Sigma-Aldrich Corporation, St Louis, Missouri, USA) was added and incubated for 30 min at RT. The reaction was arrested by the addition of 2 N H2SO4.

Due to the lack of gold standard for latent TB diagnosis and TB being highly endemic in our setting, we selected those individuals who were HIV seronegative, apparently free of TB symptoms, did not have close family contact of TB, were negative for both QFT-IT and TST and defined them as healthy individuals. To determine the cut-off point for IFNγ-inducible protein-10, we measured the IFNγ-inducible protein-10 levels in 50 healthy individuals (median 32; age range 21–45 years) and found that IFNγ-inducible protein-10 response to TB antigens ranged from 0 to 300 pg/ml. Hence, we chose 300 pg/ml as the cut-off point for IFNγ-inducible protein-10 for TB antigens. For mitogen, we chose 200 pg/ml as the cut-off point based on the earlier study results [11]. The individuals with at least 300 pg/ml for TB antigens (TB antigen-nil), irrespective of mitogen response, were considered as positive; individuals with less than 300 pg/ml for TB antigens and at least 200 pg/ml for mitogen were considered as negative; others (<300 pg/ml for TB antigen and <200 pg/ml for mitogen) were considered as indeterminate.

All 50 HIV–TB patients were positive by culture, and the presence of M. tuberculosis was confirmed by Gen-Probe method (Gen-Probe Inc., San Diego, California, USA). The median CD4 cell count was 86 (interquartile range = 38 188) cells/μl, with a range of 11–502 cells/μl (available only for 36 individuals). The IFNγ and IFNγ-inducible protein-10 secretion to TB antigen was in the range 0–26 IU/ml (median 1.375 IU/ml) and 0–14 630 pg/ml (median 1309 pg/ml), respectively (Fig. 1). Of 50 HIV–TB patients, 35 [70%, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 57–83] were positive, five (10%, 95% CI = 2–18) were negative and 10 (20%, 95% CI = 9–31) were indeterminate for QFT-IT. The IFNγ-inducible protein-10 assay showed 43 positive (86%, 95% CI = 76–96), two negative (4%, 95% CI = 0–9) and five indeterminate (10%, 95% CI = 2–18) results.

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Image Tools

Among the 10 QFT-IT indeterminate individuals, five (50%) became positive for IFNγ-inducible protein-10 and the other five remained indeterminate. Of the five QFT-IT-negative individuals, three became positive for IFNγ-inducible protein-10. One IFNγ-inducible protein-10-negative individual was positive for QFT-IT. When indeterminate results were considered as negative, QFT-IT and IFNγ-inducible protein-10 yielded 70% and 86% sensitivities, respectively. The sensitivity of IFNγ-inducible protein-10 was significantly higher than QFT-IT (P = 0.045). No significant difference in the CD4 cell count was observed between QFT-IT/IFNγ-inducible protein-10-positive and negative individuals. The CD4 cell counts did not significantly differ between QFT-IT-negative/indeterminate and IFNγ-inducible protein-10-negative/indeterminate individuals. However, IFNγ-inducible protein-10 yielded indeterminate results only when CD4 cell count was less than 50 cells/μl, whereas QFT-IT yielded indeterminate results when CD4 cell count was less than 200 cells/μl.

Our results show that IFNγ-inducible protein-10 detected more HIV–TB cases and particularly yielded 50% less indeterminate results when compared with QFT-IT. This is the first study to compare IFNγ and IFNγ-inducible protein-10 levels in HIV–TB patients recruited from a setting, endemic for both HIV and TB. We speculate the following reasons for higher sensitivity of IFNγ-inducible protein-10. First, IFNγ-inducible protein-10 is mainly secreted by monocytes/macrophages [15] in contrast to IFNγ, which is secreted mainly by CD4 cells and hence less affected by HIV infection and less influenced by low CD4 cell counts when compared with QFT-IT. Second, as IFNγ-inducible protein-10 is an amplified signal of IFNγ [16,17], even small number of IFNγ-secreting cells can induce large quantity of IFNγ-inducible protein-10 secretion.

This study was conducted with a small sample size, and CD4 cell counts were available for 36 individuals only, which emphasizes the requirement for further studies on this issue. In addition, the specificity of IFNγ-inducible protein-10 also has to be assessed in HIV-positive, TB-negative patients to validate the cut-off point. In conclusion, our preliminary study provides an interesting hypothesis that IFNγ-inducible protein-10 may be evaluated as a better alternative marker for LTBI diagnosis in immunocompromised individuals.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the project consultant Dr Lee W. Riley, Division of Infectious Diseases, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA, for fruitful discussions. The statistical assistance provided by Dr Venkatesan Perumal, Head, Department of Statistics, Tuberculosis Research Centre, is kindly acknowledged. Basirudeen Syed Ahamed Kabeer is the recipient of Senior Research Fellowship from Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), New Delhi, India. This project is financially supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) (R03) grant (AI064055).

The funding agency had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.

This article was accepted for poster presentation in the 2nd Global symposium on IGRA, held at Dubrovnik, Croatia, 30 May to 1 June 2009.

Back to Top | Article Outline

References

1. Sutherland I. Recent studies in the epidemiology of tuberculosis, based on the risk of being infected with tubercle bacilli. Adv Tuberc Res 1976; 19:1–63.

2. Vynnycky E, Fine PE. The natural history of tuberculosis: the implications of age-dependent risks of disease and the role of reinfection. Epidemiol Infect 1997; 119:183–201.

3. El-Sadr WM, Tsiouris SJ. HIV-associated tuberculosis: diagnostic and treatment challenges. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2008; 29:525–531.

4. Mukadi YD, Maher D, Harries A. Tuberculosis case fatality rates in high HIV prevalence populations in sub-Saharan Africa. AIDS 2001; 15:143–152.

5. Pai M, Riley LW, Colford JM Jr. Interferon-gamma assays in the immunodiagnosis of tuberculosis: a systematic review. Lancet Infect Dis 2004; 4:761–776.

6. Karam F, Mbow F, Fletcher H, Senghor CS, Coulibaly KD, LeFevre AM, et al. Sensitivity of IFN-gamma release assay to detect latent tuberculosis infection is retained in HIV-infected patients but dependent on HIV/AIDS progression. PLoS One 2008; 3:e1441.

7. Raby E, Moyo M, Devendra A, Banda J, De Haas P, Ayles H, Godfrey-Faussett P. The effects of HIV on the sensitivity of a whole blood IFN-gamma release assay in Zambian adults with active tuberculosis. PLoS One 2008; 3:e2489.

8. Pai M, Zwerling A, Menzies D. Systematic review: T-cell-based assays for the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection – an update. Ann Intern Med 2008; 149:177–184.

9. Bocchinno M, Bellofire B, Matarese A, Galati D, Sanduzzi A. IFN-γ release assay in tuberculosis management in selected high-risk population. Expert Rev Mol Diag 2009; 9:165–177.

10. Ruhwald M, Bjerregaard-Andersen M, Rabna P, Kofoed K, Eugen-Olsen J, Ravn P. IP-10/CXCL10 release is induced by incubation of whole blood from tuberculosis patients with ESAT-6, CFP10 and TB7.7. Microbes Infect 2007; 9:806–812.

11. Ruhwald M, Bodmer T, Maier C, Jepsen M, Haaland MB, Eugen-Olsen J, Ravn P. Evaluating the potential of IP-10 and MCP-2 as biomarkers for the diagnosis of tuberculosis. Eur Respir J 2008; 32:1607–1615.

12. Lighter J, Rigaud M, Huie M, Peng CH, Pollack H. Chemokine IP-10: an adjunct marker for latent tuberculosis infection in children. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2009; 13:731–736.

13. Dheda K, Van-Zyl Smit RN, Sechi LA, Badri M, Meldau R, Symons G, et al. Clinical diagnostic utility of IP-10 and LAM antigen levels for the diagnosis of tuberculous pleural effusions in a high burden setting. PLoS One 2009; 4:e4689.

14. Whittaker E, Gordon A, Kampmann B. Is IP-10 a better biomarker for active and latent tuberculosis in children than IFN gamma? PLoS One 2008; 3:e3901.

15. Moser B, Loetscher P. Lymphocyte traffic control by chemokines. Nat Immunol 2001; 2:123–128.

16. Ragno S, Romano M, Howell S, Pappin DJ, Jenner PJ, Colston MJ. Changes in gene expression in macrophages infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a combined transcriptomic and proteomic approach. Immunology 2001; 104:99–108.

17. Dhillon NK, Peng F, Ransohoff RM, Buch S. PDGF synergistically enhances IFN-gamma-induced expression of CXCL10 in blood-derived macrophages: implications for HIV dementia. J Immunol 2007; 179:2722–2730.

Cited By:

This article has been cited 5 time(s).

Plos One
Immune Responses to ESAT-6 and CFP-10 by FASCIA and Multiplex Technology for Diagnosis of M. tuberculosis Infection; IP-10 Is a Promising Marker
Borgstrom, E; Andersen, P; Atterfelt, F; Julander, I; Kallenius, G; Maeurer, M; Rosenkrands, I; Widfeldt, M; Bruchfeld, J; Gaines, H
Plos One, 7(): -.
ARTN e43438
CrossRef
Plos One
Role of QuantiFERON-TB Gold, Interferon Gamma Inducible Protein-10 and Tuberculin Skin Test in Active Tuberculosis Diagnosis
Kabeer, BSA; Raman, B; Thomas, A; Perumal, V; Raja, A
Plos One, 5(2): -.
ARTN e9051
CrossRef
Plos One
Utility of Host Markers Detected in Quantiferon Supernatants for the Diagnosis of Tuberculosis in Children in a High-Burden Setting
Chegou, NN; Detjen, AK; Thiart, L; Walters, E; Mandalakas, AM; Hesseling, AC; Walzl, G
Plos One, 8(5): -.
ARTN e64226
CrossRef
European Respiratory Journal
Dried plasma spots in the diagnosis of tuberculosis: IP-10 release assay on filter paper
Aabye, MG; Latorre, I; Diaz, J; Maldonado, J; Mialdea, I; Eugen-Olsen, J; Ravn, P; Dominguez, J; Ruhwald, M
European Respiratory Journal, 42(2): 495-503.
10.1183/09031936.00129412
CrossRef
Journal of Infection
Plasma cytokines and chemokines differentiate between active disease and non-active tuberculosis infection
Mihret, A; Bekele, Y; Bobosha, K; Kidd, M; Aseffa, A; Howe, R; Walzl, G
Journal of Infection, 66(4): 357-365.
10.1016/j.jinf.2012.11.005
CrossRef
Back to Top | Article Outline

© 2010 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

Login